{"as_of":"2026-08-07T19:46:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:ec0a7d2770ae10ca208d4951b6358fb6cc4cdf59111ba8098559343c284e22c8","coverage":[{"denominator":0,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":2,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":2,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":2,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":2,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:02:33.410168Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"pith","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T12:16:14.913508Z","state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2412.10281","last_updated":"2024-12-13T17:03:56Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:09:49.003184Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-13T17:03:56Z","title":"One world, one opinion? The superstar effect in LLM responses","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2412.10281","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:02:33.410168Z","title":"Goethals and L","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.17024","last_updated":"2025-07-22T21:27:16Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:55:58.940029Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-22T21:27:16Z","title":"Write, Rank, or Rate: Comparing Methods for Studying Visualization Affordances","version":1},"reference_index":28,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:02:33.410168Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2412.10281","citing_paper":"/paper/2507.17024"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a25eac33f5dd85f7c429439fa65adc4e93de1e64bff01df12050976922d6e399","observation_id":"29fdf2f6-fcf4-4485-b2dc-28ed0606d216","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:02:33.410168Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2412.10281","last_updated":"2024-12-13T17:03:56Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:09:49.003184Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-13T17:03:56Z","title":"One world, one opinion? The superstar effect in LLM responses","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2412.10281","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2412.10281","metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"2412.10281","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T12:16:14.913508Z","title":"One world, one opinion? The superstar effect in LLM responses","venue":"cs.CL","work_id":"2c411a91-0e6c-4a3f-8b2c-f5ce33195985","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2509.02910","last_updated":"2025-09-03T00:33:49Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T11:20:32.695886Z","submitted_at":"2025-09-03T00:33:49Z","title":"The Basic B*** Effect: The Use of LLM-based Agents Reduces the Distinctiveness and Diversity of People's Choices","version":1},"reference_index":13,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T11:20:34.823938Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2412.10281","citing_paper":"/paper/2509.02910"},"observation_digest":"sha256:aa9986481d9143786f323fd25e3178ca16217ef0f3de7bbe32bf62c220502911","observation_id":"58234446-2981-4c73-b899-282e068d54a2","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T11:20:36.372709Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}}],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2412.10281/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2412.10281/integrity","json":"/paper/2412.10281/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2412.10281"},"outbound":[],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2412.10281","last_updated":"2024-12-13T17:03:56Z","latest_version":1,"primary_category":"cs.CL","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:09:49.003184Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-13T17:03:56Z","title":"One world, one opinion? The superstar effect in LLM responses"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":0,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":0,"verified_exact":0,"verified_fuzzy":0},"total_outbound_references":0},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 7 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 2 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2412.10281."}