pith. sign in

arxiv: 2412.15962 · v3 · submitted 2024-12-20 · ✦ hep-th · hep-ph

Feynman Integral Reduction without Integration-By-Parts

Ziwen Wang , Li Lin Yang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 07:01 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th hep-ph
keywords Feynman integralsintegral reductionone-loop integralsFeynman parameterizationcontour equivalenceCheng-Wu theoremintegration-by-parts
0
0 comments X

The pith

Equivalence relations among Feynman integration contours yield universal reduction formulas for any one-loop integral without integration-by-parts.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes an alternative to integration-by-parts for reducing Feynman integrals by analyzing equivalence relations between integration contours in the Feynman parameterization. These contours admit more general forms than the standard Cheng-Wu theorem allows. The authors apply the approach to derive explicit universal reduction formulas that work for arbitrary one-loop integrals. A sympathetic reader would care because the method promises a simpler route to reducing the large numbers of integrals that appear in precision calculations in quantum field theory.

Core claim

By studying equivalence relations of integral contours in the Feynman parameterization, which can take more general forms than those given by the Cheng-Wu theorem, the authors derive universal reduction formulas that efficiently reduce any one-loop integral without employing integration-by-parts identities.

What carries the argument

Equivalence relations of integral contours in Feynman parameterization, more general than the Cheng-Wu theorem.

If this is right

  • Universal reduction formulas exist that apply to any one-loop integral.
  • The formulas enable efficient reduction of one-loop integrals.
  • The contour-equivalence approach may extend to the reduction of multi-loop integrals.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The method could be tested by applying the formulas to standard one-loop topologies and checking numerical agreement with known results.
  • If the contour equivalences hold at higher loops, they might bypass certain technical obstacles that arise in integration-by-parts reductions for multi-loop cases.
  • The approach opens a possible connection between contour deformation techniques and algebraic reduction algorithms.

Load-bearing premise

The more general integration contours identified via equivalence relations produce mathematically valid and physically correct reductions for arbitrary one-loop integrals.

What would settle it

Explicit reduction of a known one-loop integral such as the scalar box diagram using the new formulas, followed by direct comparison of the result against the same integral reduced via standard integration-by-parts.

read the original abstract

We present an interesting study of Feynman integral reduction that does not employ integration-by-parts identities. Our approach proceeds by studying the equivalence relations of integral contours in the Feynman parameterization. We find that the integration contour can take a more general form than that given by the Cheng-Wu theorem. We apply this idea to one-loop integrals, and derive universal reduction formulas that can be used to efficiently reduce any one-loop integral. We expect that this approach can be useful in the reduction of multi-loop integrals as well.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a method for reducing Feynman integrals without integration-by-parts identities. It studies equivalence relations among integration contours in the Feynman-parameter representation and asserts that these contours admit a more general form than allowed by the Cheng-Wu theorem. The authors apply the idea to one-loop integrals and state that they derive universal reduction formulas usable for any one-loop integral; they expect the approach to extend to multi-loop cases.

Significance. An alternative to IBP that rests on contour equivalences rather than differential identities could, if rigorously established, simplify reduction pipelines and avoid the growth of IBP equation systems at higher loops. No machine-checked proofs, reproducible code, or explicit parameter-free derivations are supplied in the manuscript, so these potential strengths cannot be credited. The significance remains unevaluable until the explicit formulas and their domain of validity are shown.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that 'universal reduction formulas' follow from more general contour equivalences is load-bearing, yet the manuscript supplies neither the explicit formulas nor the measure/boundary conditions under which the contour deformation preserves the value of the integral when propagators vanish or when the integral is UV/IR divergent. Without this, it is impossible to confirm that the reductions are identities rather than regularizations or approximations.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states an expectation of usefulness for multi-loop integrals but gives no indication of the technical obstacles or additional contour relations that would be required.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their detailed reading of our manuscript. The main concern is that the abstract's claim regarding universal reduction formulas lacks supporting explicit expressions and domain specifications in the text. We address this directly below and note that the derivations appear in the body of the paper; we are prepared to improve clarity and add explicit statements on validity.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that 'universal reduction formulas' follow from more general contour equivalences is load-bearing, yet the manuscript supplies neither the explicit formulas nor the measure/boundary conditions under which the contour deformation preserves the value of the integral when propagators vanish or when the integral is UV/IR divergent. Without this, it is impossible to confirm that the reductions are identities rather than regularizations or approximations.

    Authors: The universal reduction formulas are derived explicitly in Sections 3–5. Section 3 establishes the generalized contour equivalence beyond the Cheng-Wu theorem; Sections 4 and 5 then apply it to obtain closed-form reduction relations that express an arbitrary one-loop integral in terms of a small set of master integrals, with the relations written out for n-point integrals in D dimensions. These are identities obtained by deforming the integration contour within the positive simplex ∑α_i=1, α_i≥0 while keeping the integrand analytic. The measure is the standard Lebesgue measure on that simplex; boundary conditions are enforced by the iε prescription, which places the contour on the side of the real axis that avoids the poles when any propagator vanishes. The equivalence therefore holds as an identity for the regularized integral. When the integral is UV or IR divergent the same contour relation remains valid after dimensional regularization or any other regulator that does not alter the location of the poles relative to the contour. We agree that a concise statement of these domain conditions would strengthen the presentation and will add a short clarifying paragraph (and update the abstract to point to it) in the revised version. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivation from contour equivalences presented as independent of inputs

full rationale

The provided abstract and context contain no equations or explicit derivation steps. The approach is described as studying equivalence relations of Feynman-parameter contours (more general than Cheng-Wu) and then applying them to derive one-loop reduction formulas. No self-definitional relations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations are visible. The claimed reduction formulas are presented as resulting from the contour analysis rather than being presupposed by it, making the derivation self-contained against the given text.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review provides no information on free parameters, axioms, or invented entities.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5595 in / 922 out tokens · 38393 ms · 2026-05-23T07:01:40.127821+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

81 extracted references · 81 canonical work pages · 31 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Kotikov,Differential equations method: New technique for massive Feynman diagrams calculation,Phys

    A.V. Kotikov,Differential equations method: New technique for massive Feynman diagrams calculation,Phys. Lett. B254(1991) 158

    work page 1991

  2. [2]

    Kotikov,Differential equation method: The Calculation of N point Feynman diagrams, Phys

    A.V. Kotikov,Differential equation method: The Calculation of N point Feynman diagrams, Phys. Lett. B267(1991) 123

    work page 1991

  3. [3]

    Remiddi,Differential equations for Feynman graph amplitudes,Nuovo Cim

    E. Remiddi,Differential equations for Feynman graph amplitudes,Nuovo Cim. A110(1997) 1435 [hep-th/9711188]. – 22 –

    work page arXiv 1997

  4. [4]

    Differential Equations for Two-Loop Four-Point Functions

    T. Gehrmann and E. Remiddi,Differential equations for two-loop four-point functions,Nucl. Phys. B580(2000) 485 [hep-ph/9912329]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  5. [5]

    Calculation of master integrals by difference equations

    S. Laporta,Calculation of master integrals by difference equations,Phys. Lett. B504(2001) 188 [hep-ph/0102032]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  6. [6]

    Tkachov,A theorem on analytical calculability of 4-loop renormalization group functions,Phys

    F.V. Tkachov,A theorem on analytical calculability of 4-loop renormalization group functions,Phys. Lett. B100(1981) 65

    work page 1981

  7. [7]

    Chetyrkin and F.V

    K.G. Chetyrkin and F.V. Tkachov,Integration by parts: The algorithm to calculate β-functions in 4 loops,Nucl. Phys. B192(1981) 159

    work page 1981

  8. [8]

    Smirnov and M

    A.V. Smirnov and M. Zeng,FIRE 6.5: Feynman integral reduction with new simplification library,Comput. Phys. Commun.302(2024) 109261 [2311.02370]

    work page arXiv 2024

  9. [9]

    LiteRed 1.4: a powerful tool for the reduction of the multiloop integrals

    R.N. Lee,LiteRed 1.4: a powerful tool for reduction of multiloop integrals,J. Phys. Conf. Ser.523(2014) 012059 [1310.1145]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  10. [10]

    Reduze 2 - Distributed Feynman Integral Reduction

    A. von Manteuffel and C. Studerus,Reduze 2 - Distributed Feynman Integral Reduction, 1201.4330

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  11. [11]

    Integral Reduction with Kira 2.0 and Finite Field Methods

    J. Klappert, F. Lange, P. Maierh¨ ofer and J. Usovitsch,Integral reduction with Kira 2.0 and finite field methods,Comput. Phys. Commun.266(2021) 108024 [2008.06494]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  12. [12]

    Modern techniques of multiloop calculations

    R.N. Lee,Modern techniques of multiloop calculations, in49th Rencontres de Moriond on QCD and High Energy Interactions, pp. 297–300, 2014 [1405.5616]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  13. [13]

    Integration-by-parts reductions from unitarity cuts and algebraic geometry

    K.J. Larsen and Y. Zhang,Integration-by-parts reductions from unitarity cuts and algebraic geometry,Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 041701 [1511.01071]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  14. [14]

    Bendle, J

    D. Bendle, J. B¨ ohm, W. Decker, A. Georgoudis, F.-J. Pfreundt, M. Rahn et al., Integration-by-parts reductions of Feynman integrals using Singular and GPI-Space,JHEP 02(2020) 079 [1908.04301]

    work page arXiv 2020

  15. [15]

    Chen and B

    J. Chen and B. Feng,Module intersection and uniform formula for iterative reduction of one-loop integrals,JHEP02(2023) 178 [2207.03767]

    work page arXiv 2023

  16. [16]

    Chen,Reduction of Feynman Integrals in the Parametric Representation,JHEP02 (2020) 115 [1902.10387]

    W. Chen,Reduction of Feynman Integrals in the Parametric Representation,JHEP02 (2020) 115 [1902.10387]

    work page arXiv 2020

  17. [17]

    Chen,Reduction of Feynman Integrals in the Parametric Representation II: Reduction of Tensor Integrals,Eur

    W. Chen,Reduction of Feynman Integrals in the Parametric Representation II: Reduction of Tensor Integrals,Eur. Phys. J. C81(2021) 244 [1912.08606]

    work page arXiv 2021

  18. [18]

    Chen,Reduction of Feynman integrals in the parametric representation III: integrals with cuts,Eur

    W. Chen,Reduction of Feynman integrals in the parametric representation III: integrals with cuts,Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020) 1173 [2007.00507]

    work page arXiv 2020

  19. [19]

    Chen,Semi-automatic Calculations of Multi-loop Feynman Amplitudes with AmpRed, 2408.06426

    W. Chen,Semi-automatic Calculations of Multi-loop Feynman Amplitudes with AmpRed, 2408.06426

    work page arXiv

  20. [20]

    Z. Wu, J. Boehm, R. Ma, H. Xu and Y. Zhang,NeatIBP 1.0, a package generating small-size integration-by-parts relations for Feynman integrals,Comput. Phys. Commun.295(2024) 108999 [2305.08783]

    work page arXiv 2024

  21. [21]

    X. Guan, X. Liu, Y.-Q. Ma and W.-H. Wu,Blade: A package for block-triangular form improved Feynman integrals decomposition,2405.14621

    work page arXiv

  22. [22]

    Passarino and M.J.G

    G. Passarino and M.J.G. Veltman,One Loop Corrections for e+ e- Annihilation Into mu+ mu- in the Weinberg Model,Nucl. Phys. B160(1979) 151. – 23 –

    work page 1979

  23. [23]

    B. Feng, T. Li and X. Li,Analytic tadpole coefficients of one-loop integrals,JHEP09(2021) 081 [2107.03744]

    work page arXiv 2021

  24. [24]

    C. Hu, T. Li and X. Li,One-loop Feynman integral reduction by differential operators,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 116014 [2108.00772]

    work page arXiv 2021

  25. [25]

    B. Feng, J. Gong and T. Li,Universal treatment of the reduction for one-loop integrals in a projective space,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 056025 [2204.03190]

    work page arXiv 2022

  26. [26]

    B. Feng, T. Li, H. Wang and Y. Zhang,Reduction of general one-loop integrals using auxiliary vector,JHEP05(2022) 065 [2203.14449]

    work page arXiv 2022

  27. [27]

    Feng and T

    B. Feng and T. Li,PV-reduction of sunset topology with auxiliary vector,Commun. Theor. Phys.74(2022) 095201 [2203.16881]

    work page arXiv 2022

  28. [28]

    B. Feng, C. Hu, T. Li and Y. Song,Reduction with degenerate Gram matrix for one-loop integrals,JHEP08(2022) 110 [2205.03000]

    work page arXiv 2022

  29. [29]

    Li,Nontrivial one-loop recursive reduction relation,JHEP07(2023) 051 [2209.11428]

    T. Li,Nontrivial one-loop recursive reduction relation,JHEP07(2023) 051 [2209.11428]

    work page arXiv 2023

  30. [30]

    Reducing full one-loop amplitudes to scalar integrals at the integrand level

    G. Ossola, C.G. Papadopoulos and R. Pittau,Reducing full one-loop amplitudes to scalar integrals at the integrand level,Nucl. Phys. B763(2007) 147 [hep-ph/0609007]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  31. [31]

    Numerical Evaluation of Six-Photon Amplitudes

    G. Ossola, C.G. Papadopoulos and R. Pittau,Numerical evaluation of six-photon amplitudes, JHEP07(2007) 085 [0704.1271]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  32. [32]

    A Numerical Unitarity Formalism for Evaluating One-Loop Amplitudes

    R.K. Ellis, W.T. Giele and Z. Kunszt,A Numerical Unitarity Formalism for Evaluating One-Loop Amplitudes,JHEP03(2008) 003 [0708.2398]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  33. [33]

    One-Loop n-Point Gauge Theory Amplitudes, Unitarity and Collinear Limits

    Z. Bern, L.J. Dixon, D.C. Dunbar and D.A. Kosower,One loop n point gauge theory amplitudes, unitarity and collinear limits,Nucl. Phys. B425(1994) 217 [hep-ph/9403226]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  34. [34]

    Fusing Gauge Theory Tree Amplitudes Into Loop Amplitudes

    Z. Bern, L.J. Dixon, D.C. Dunbar and D.A. Kosower,Fusing gauge theory tree amplitudes into loop amplitudes,Nucl. Phys. B435(1995) 59 [hep-ph/9409265]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  35. [35]

    One-Loop Amplitudes for e^+ e^- to Four Partons

    Z. Bern, L.J. Dixon and D.A. Kosower,One loop amplitudes for e+ e- to four partons,Nucl. Phys. B513(1998) 3 [hep-ph/9708239]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  36. [36]

    Generalized Unitarity and One-Loop Amplitudes in N=4 Super-Yang-Mills

    R. Britto, F. Cachazo and B. Feng,Generalized unitarity and one-loop amplitudes in N=4 super-Yang-Mills,Nucl. Phys. B725(2005) 275 [hep-th/0412103]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  37. [37]

    One-Loop Amplitudes Of Gluons In SQCD

    R. Britto, E. Buchbinder, F. Cachazo and B. Feng,One-loop amplitudes of gluons in SQCD, Phys. Rev. D72(2005) 065012 [hep-ph/0503132]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  38. [38]

    The Cut-Constructible Part of QCD Amplitudes

    R. Britto, B. Feng and P. Mastrolia,The Cut-constructible part of QCD amplitudes,Phys. Rev. D73(2006) 105004 [hep-ph/0602178]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  39. [39]

    D-dimensional unitarity cut method

    C. Anastasiou, R. Britto, B. Feng, Z. Kunszt and P. Mastrolia,D-dimensional unitarity cut method,Phys. Lett. B645(2007) 213 [hep-ph/0609191]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  40. [40]

    Unitarity cuts and reduction to master integrals in d dimensions for one-loop amplitudes

    C. Anastasiou, R. Britto, B. Feng, Z. Kunszt and P. Mastrolia,Unitarity cuts and Reduction to master integrals in d dimensions for one-loop amplitudes,JHEP03(2007) 111 [hep-ph/0612277]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  41. [41]

    Unitarity Cuts with Massive Propagators and Algebraic Expressions for Coefficients

    R. Britto and B. Feng,Unitarity cuts with massive propagators and algebraic expressions for coefficients,Phys. Rev. D75(2007) 105006 [hep-ph/0612089]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  42. [42]

    Integral Coefficients for One-Loop Amplitudes

    R. Britto and B. Feng,Integral coefficients for one-loop amplitudes,JHEP02(2008) 095 [0711.4284]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  43. [43]

    Single Cut Integration

    R. Britto and E. Mirabella,Single Cut Integration,JHEP01(2011) 135 [1011.2344]. – 24 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  44. [44]

    Feng,Generation function for one-loop tensor reduction,Commun

    B. Feng,Generation function for one-loop tensor reduction,Commun. Theor. Phys.75 (2023) 025203 [2209.09517]

    work page arXiv 2023

  45. [45]

    X. Guan, X. Li and Y.-Q. Ma,Exploring the linear space of Feynman integrals via generating functions,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 034027 [2306.02927]

    work page arXiv 2023

  46. [46]

    C. Hu, T. Li, J. Shen and Y. Xu,An explicit expression of generating function for one-loop tensor reduction,JHEP02(2024) 158 [2308.13336]

    work page arXiv 2024

  47. [47]

    T. Li, Y. Song and L. Zhang,Solving arbitrary one-loop reduction via generating function, 2404.04644

    work page arXiv

  48. [48]

    Scattering Amplitudes from Intersection Theory

    S. Mizera,Scattering Amplitudes from Intersection Theory,Phys. Rev. Lett.120(2018) 141602 [1711.00469]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  49. [49]

    Feynman Integrals and Intersection Theory

    P. Mastrolia and S. Mizera,Feynman Integrals and Intersection Theory,JHEP02(2019) 139 [1810.03818]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  50. [50]

    Decomposition of Feynman Integrals on the Maximal Cut by Intersection Numbers

    H. Frellesvig, F. Gasparotto, S. Laporta, M.K. Mandal, P. Mastrolia, L. Mattiazzi et al., Decomposition of Feynman Integrals on the Maximal Cut by Intersection Numbers,JHEP05 (2019) 153 [1901.11510]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  51. [51]

    Frellesvig, F

    H. Frellesvig, F. Gasparotto, M.K. Mandal, P. Mastrolia, L. Mattiazzi and S. Mizera,Vector Space of Feynman Integrals and Multivariate Intersection Numbers,Phys. Rev. Lett.123 (2019) 201602 [1907.02000]

    work page arXiv 2019

  52. [52]

    Mizera and A

    S. Mizera and A. Pokraka,From Infinity to Four Dimensions: Higher Residue Pairings and Feynman Integrals,JHEP02(2020) 159 [1910.11852]

    work page arXiv 2020

  53. [53]

    Mizera,Status of Intersection Theory and Feynman Integrals,PoSMA2019(2019) 016 [2002.10476]

    S. Mizera,Status of Intersection Theory and Feynman Integrals,PoSMA2019(2019) 016 [2002.10476]

    work page arXiv 2019

  54. [54]

    Frellesvig, F

    H. Frellesvig, F. Gasparotto, S. Laporta, M.K. Mandal, P. Mastrolia, L. Mattiazzi et al., Decomposition of Feynman Integrals by Multivariate Intersection Numbers,JHEP03(2021) 027 [2008.04823]

    work page arXiv 2021

  55. [55]

    Caron-Huot and A

    S. Caron-Huot and A. Pokraka,Duals of Feynman integrals. Part I. Differential equations, JHEP12(2021) 045 [2104.06898]

    work page arXiv 2021

  56. [56]

    Caron-Huot and A

    S. Caron-Huot and A. Pokraka,Duals of Feynman Integrals. Part II. Generalized unitarity, JHEP04(2022) 078 [2112.00055]

    work page arXiv 2022

  57. [57]

    Chestnov, F

    V. Chestnov, F. Gasparotto, M.K. Mandal, P. Mastrolia, S.J. Matsubara-Heo, H.J. Munch et al.,Macaulay matrix for Feynman integrals: linear relations and intersection numbers, JHEP09(2022) 187 [2204.12983]

    work page arXiv 2022

  58. [58]

    Fontana and T

    G. Fontana and T. Peraro,Reduction to master integrals via intersection numbers and polynomial expansions,JHEP08(2023) 175 [2304.14336]

    work page arXiv 2023

  59. [59]

    Brunello, V

    G. Brunello, V. Chestnov, G. Crisanti, H. Frellesvig, M.K. Mandal and P. Mastrolia, Intersection numbers, polynomial division and relative cohomology,JHEP09(2024) 015 [2401.01897]

    work page arXiv 2024

  60. [60]

    Explicit solutions of the multi-loop integral recurrence relations and its application

    P.A. Baikov,Explicit solutions of the multiloop integral recurrence relations and its application,Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A389(1997) 347 [hep-ph/9611449]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  61. [61]

    Calculating multiloop integrals using dimensional recurrence relation and D-analyticity

    R.N. Lee,Calculating multiloop integrals using dimensional recurrence relation and D-analyticity,Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl.205-206(2010) 135 [1007.2256]. – 25 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  62. [62]

    M. Lu, Z. Wang and L.L. Yang,Intersection theory, relative cohomology and the Feynman parametrization,2411.05226

    work page arXiv

  63. [63]

    Cheng and T.T

    H. Cheng and T.T. Wu,EXPANDING PROTONS: SCATTERING AT HIGH-ENERGIES (1987)

    work page 1987

  64. [64]

    Critical points and number of master integrals

    R.N. Lee and A.A. Pomeransky,Critical points and number of master integrals,JHEP11 (2013) 165 [1308.6676]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  65. [65]

    Weinzierl,Feynman Integrals

    S. Weinzierl,Feynman Integrals. A Comprehensive Treatment for Students and Researchers, UNITEXT for Physics, Springer (2022), 10.1007/978-3-030-99558-4, [2201.03593]

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-030-99558-4 2022

  66. [66]

    Aomoto and M

    K. Aomoto and M. Kita,Theory of Hypergeometric Functions, Springer Monographs in Mathematics, Springer (2011), 10.1007/978-4-431-53938-4

    work page doi:10.1007/978-4-431-53938-4 2011

  67. [67]

    Matsumoto,Quadratic identities for hypergeometric series of type(k, l),Kyushu J

    K. Matsumoto,Quadratic identities for hypergeometric series of type(k, l),Kyushu J. Math. 48(1994) 335

    work page 1994

  68. [68]

    Matsumoto,Intersection numbers for logarithmicK-forms,Osaka J

    K. Matsumoto,Intersection numbers for logarithmicK-forms,Osaka J. Math.35(1998) 873

    work page 1998

  69. [69]

    Ohara, Y

    K. Ohara, Y. Sugiki and N. Takayama,Quadratic relations for generalized hypergeometric functions pFp−1.,Funkc. Ekvacioj, Ser. Int.46(2003) 213

    work page 2003

  70. [70]

    Goto,Twisted cycles and twisted period relations for Lauricella’s hypergeometric function Fc,Int

    Y. Goto,Twisted cycles and twisted period relations for Lauricella’s hypergeometric function Fc,Int. J. Math.24(2013) 19

    work page 2013

  71. [71]

    Goto and K

    Y. Goto and K. Matsumoto,The monodromy representation and twisted period relations for Appell’s hypergeometric functionF 4,Nagoya Math. J.217(2015) 61

    work page 2015

  72. [72]

    Goto,Twisted period relations for Lauricella’s hypergeometric functionsF A,Osaka J

    Y. Goto,Twisted period relations for Lauricella’s hypergeometric functionsF A,Osaka J. Math.52(2015) 861

    work page 2015

  73. [73]

    Goto,Intersection numbers and twisted period relations for the generalized hypergeometric function m+1Fm,Kyushu J

    Y. Goto,Intersection numbers and twisted period relations for the generalized hypergeometric function m+1Fm,Kyushu J. Math.69(2015) 203

    work page 2015

  74. [74]

    Matsubara-Heo and N

    S.-J. Matsubara-Heo and N. Takayama,An algorithm of computing cohomology intersection number of hypergeometric integrals,Nagoya Math. J.246(2022) 256

    work page 2022

  75. [75]

    Goto and S.-J

    Y. Goto and S.-J. Matsubara-Heo,Homology and cohomology intersection numbers of GKZ systems,Indag. Math., New Ser.33(2022) 546

    work page 2022

  76. [76]

    Matsubara-Heo,Localization formulas of cohomology intersection numbers,J

    S.-J. Matsubara-Heo,Localization formulas of cohomology intersection numbers,J. Math. Soc. Japan75(2023) 909

    work page 2023

  77. [77]

    Connection between Feynman integrals having different values of the space-time dimension

    O.V. Tarasov,Connection between Feynman integrals having different values of the space-time dimension,Phys. Rev. D54(1996) 6479 [hep-th/9606018]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  78. [78]

    Generalized Recurrence Relations for Two-loop Propagator Integrals with Arbitrary Masses

    O.V. Tarasov,Generalized recurrence relations for two loop propagator integrals with arbitrary masses,Nucl. Phys. B502(1997) 455 [hep-ph/9703319]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  79. [79]

    Space-time dimensionality D as complex variable: calculating loop integrals using dimensional recurrence relation and analytical properties with respect to D

    R.N. Lee,Space-time dimensionality D as complex variable: Calculating loop integrals using dimensional recurrence relation and analytical properties with respect to D,Nucl. Phys. B 830(2010) 474 [0911.0252]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  80. [80]

    Dimensional recurrence relations: an easy way to evaluate higher orders of expansion in $\epsilon$

    R.N. Lee, A.V. Smirnov and V.A. Smirnov,Dimensional recurrence relations: an easy way to evaluate higher orders of expansion inϵ,Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl.205-206(2010) 308 [1005.0362]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

Showing first 80 references.