{"as_of":"2026-08-16T09:54:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:771f15e6992890068421699eed23fce31f5c57936aebf72b0b159cadc660ced5","coverage":[{"denominator":70,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":70,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.121095Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":72,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":72,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":2,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":2,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T04:34:36.506332Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"pith","source_observed_at":"2026-08-08T04:25:12.996722Z","state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2412.20692","last_updated":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T05:15:56.204724Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","title":"Test Adequacy for Metamorphic Testing: Criteria, Measurement, and Implication","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2412.20692","doi":null,"metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"2412.20692","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T04:25:12.996722Z","title":"Test Adequacy for Metamorphic Testing: Criteria, Measurement, and Implication","venue":"cs.SE","work_id":"609d76ab-219d-4390-918a-d5f10df17909","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2608.05675","last_updated":"2026-08-07T04:01:19Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T09:41:31.249443Z","submitted_at":"2026-08-06T07:14:58Z","title":"Consistency Has a Computable Blind Spot: A Commutation Theory of Label-Free Reliability for Vision-Language Figure Reading","version":1},"reference_index":17,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-08T04:25:12.712830Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2412.20692","citing_paper":"/paper/2608.05675"},"observation_digest":"sha256:3b7d1834881d3283977aff237eef3f4c518f99df2fe3b42579bdd864cfb912d5","observation_id":"bbdfc398-db25-4a17-8aae-bd43f593b96e","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T04:25:13.037554Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2412.20692","last_updated":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T05:15:56.204724Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","title":"Test Adequacy for Metamorphic Testing: Criteria, Measurement, and Implication","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2412.20692","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T04:34:36.506332Z","title":"Test adequacy for metamorphic testing: Criteria, measurement, and implication, 2024","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2608.05675","last_updated":"2026-08-07T04:01:19Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T09:41:31.249443Z","submitted_at":"2026-08-06T07:14:58Z","title":"Consistency Has a Computable Blind Spot: A Commutation Theory of Label-Free Reliability for Vision-Language Figure Reading","version":2},"reference_index":17,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T04:34:36.506332Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2412.20692","citing_paper":"/paper/2608.05675"},"observation_digest":"sha256:cacdfa0423996a8784958464bf789d31cd96e992f7e46f6b4040fa4cfd5ec5d3","observation_id":"b06f7fed-766f-45f5-9abf-378e4102584f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T04:34:36.506332Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}}],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2412.20692/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2412.20692/integrity","json":"/paper/2412.20692/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2412.20692"},"outbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.923227Z","title":"Software fail watch: 5th edition,","venue":null,"work_id":"9034fbdb-e65b-43e3-8c21-3a7773191663","year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2412.20692","last_updated":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T05:15:56.204724Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","title":"Test Adequacy for Metamorphic Testing: Criteria, Measurement, and Implication","version":1},"reference_index":1,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:58.864983Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2412.20692"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f463b138651d37b7b7cf10d051eb7ae5682a3c6da42d949d30829f3d8d22467f","observation_id":"0cc46234-9a53-41f8-814b-40d99c8b4377","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.926900Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.912801Z","title":"The Oracle Problem in Software Testing: A Survey,","venue":null,"work_id":"4e5af6bd-0a0c-4413-8c57-cf46f74ef262","year":2015},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2412.20692","last_updated":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T05:15:56.204724Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","title":"Test Adequacy for Metamorphic Testing: Criteria, Measurement, and Implication","version":1},"reference_index":2,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:58.870393Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2412.20692"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e238d8bb06b3cac44961536d0b57a24dcb9199d99e383cdca1d79aa5c1e768b2","observation_id":"df1a3af7-8a0b-4706-b222-9e2376a66dd8","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.916640Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.902626Z","title":"A mapping study on testing non-testable systems,","venue":null,"work_id":"c6b152d4-11b5-49d9-8e24-06bed1c8b917","year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2412.20692","last_updated":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T05:15:56.204724Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","title":"Test Adequacy for Metamorphic Testing: Criteria, Measurement, and Implication","version":1},"reference_index":3,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:58.875186Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2412.20692"},"observation_digest":"sha256:4e063c4776e9091ca05314936c77aeb025e4a596b746c014af3fae8d3f3751e9","observation_id":"2eff1775-0a90-4abd-9599-fa8945b18e1e","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.906447Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.891900Z","title":"Metamorphic testing: a new approach for generating next test cases,","venue":null,"work_id":"13b20295-73a3-4264-8c1c-c3b6bdbd1410","year":1998},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2412.20692","last_updated":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T05:15:56.204724Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","title":"Test Adequacy for Metamorphic Testing: Criteria, Measurement, and Implication","version":1},"reference_index":4,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:58.879150Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2412.20692"},"observation_digest":"sha256:af7f830986dd6dec6ea6661d048aea223af4fa5447775ed13f284a7758dcca61","observation_id":"48e36512-84f6-4e10-962b-f2e13bebd9af","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.896233Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.881058Z","title":"DeepTest: automated testing of deep-neural-network-driven autonomous cars,","venue":null,"work_id":"40281e10-7689-4998-946d-6a0bab0c0959","year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2412.20692","last_updated":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T05:15:56.204724Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","title":"Test Adequacy for Metamorphic Testing: Criteria, Measurement, and Implication","version":1},"reference_index":5,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:58.883334Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2412.20692"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b84c75d258dd62c479fab67b3771bd653b9f8ee333becac7dc58f3276ced1ff9","observation_id":"dbf05eba-5cfb-4c98-bcde-c144c57791fd","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.885401Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.870568Z","title":"Metamorphic testing of deep learning compilers,","venue":null,"work_id":"6b7e0061-738a-4680-8058-30361ead19b1","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2412.20692","last_updated":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T05:15:56.204724Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","title":"Test Adequacy for Metamorphic Testing: Criteria, Measurement, and Implication","version":1},"reference_index":6,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:58.887447Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2412.20692"},"observation_digest":"sha256:afe708abb07a63242ebd0a684b34d805222d53b9ba3857a3d6b9dae16b79204c","observation_id":"d777fea2-5dc0-4bfe-ab7e-385721e6b069","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.874620Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.859627Z","title":"A property-based testing framework for encryption programs,","venue":null,"work_id":"e3c9667d-2235-45e7-a7db-42c4bfffe80f","year":2014},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2412.20692","last_updated":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T05:15:56.204724Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","title":"Test Adequacy for Metamorphic Testing: Criteria, Measurement, and Implication","version":1},"reference_index":7,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:58.891637Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2412.20692"},"observation_digest":"sha256:3becd397337106fd4fbc33218903900f6240fe64df817f00e1d87ebb73418145","observation_id":"d74f37fb-be57-455b-97e3-da742890a431","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.863902Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.849412Z","title":"Metamorphic robustness testing: Exposing hidden defects in citation statistics and journal impact factors,","venue":null,"work_id":"b17332da-173c-4cce-b9f3-457c46bc9250","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2412.20692","last_updated":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T05:15:56.204724Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","title":"Test Adequacy for Metamorphic Testing: Criteria, Measurement, and Implication","version":1},"reference_index":8,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:58.896287Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2412.20692"},"observation_digest":"sha256:9bb3a466bcc0eca3a9c6257df832a54b042e12c624080ab8748961f9ae8ae2c5","observation_id":"ab4c9c8a-2af5-4a4b-b805-5cadea211086","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.853159Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.839412Z","title":"Perception Matters: Detecting Perception Failures of VQA Models Using Metamorphic Testing,","venue":null,"work_id":"6c7190d9-1cd5-456d-9d2f-85f26dd3db27","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2412.20692","last_updated":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T05:15:56.204724Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","title":"Test Adequacy for Metamorphic Testing: Criteria, Measurement, and Implication","version":1},"reference_index":9,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:58.899862Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2412.20692"},"observation_digest":"sha256:bdd303a9603a101e0d82be9972fb4fb0a65fdc5a0bed174f73468e759678af51","observation_id":"b0f8f3bc-4a8c-4d56-9b18-99a5a475ba7f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.843090Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.828998Z","title":"Deepbackground: Metamorphic testing for deep-learning-driven image recognition systems accompanied by background-relevance,","venue":null,"work_id":"2a38fef9-2522-452d-bd26-dce09c8b93b7","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2412.20692","last_updated":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T05:15:56.204724Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","title":"Test Adequacy for Metamorphic Testing: Criteria, Measurement, and Implication","version":1},"reference_index":10,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:58.903537Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2412.20692"},"observation_digest":"sha256:228970320fa69e4df2048a2f9feb7b4190ac6ecbea2082a13fe90cfa374cf449","observation_id":"1e1ff4d1-db7c-4db9-9def-d6aed18b51c9","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.832746Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.818113Z","title":"An interleaving-guided metamorphic testing approach for concurrent programs,","venue":null,"work_id":"166011b1-15ac-44cb-ab85-6e18712f37eb","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2412.20692","last_updated":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T05:15:56.204724Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","title":"Test Adequacy for Metamorphic Testing: Criteria, Measurement, and Implication","version":1},"reference_index":11,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:58.907171Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2412.20692"},"observation_digest":"sha256:31b3a5b0a9b71327e6c87ec0674d88906c9f798880e6c1aa72f62625ea4031be","observation_id":"f913205e-1f67-4240-b41d-d0caa473fd65","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.821985Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.807847Z","title":"ISO/IEC/IEEE International Standard – Software and systems engineering – Software testing – Part 4: Test techniques,","venue":null,"work_id":"0fac3508-e1c5-41db-8fd0-de9105569ff7","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2412.20692","last_updated":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T05:15:56.204724Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","title":"Test Adequacy for Metamorphic Testing: Criteria, Measurement, and Implication","version":1},"reference_index":12,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:58.910699Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2412.20692"},"observation_digest":"sha256:45020ea74f8352130cd1ce83065ebf79b025a9cafc6b9cf6d38314e5693df07b","observation_id":"41ee2301-6210-4492-b986-679774b4ba8a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.811842Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.797812Z","title":"MRpredT: Using Text Mining for Metamorphic Relation Prediction,","venue":null,"work_id":"648bd20a-e97d-4008-a9e0-1f8311737007","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2412.20692","last_updated":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T05:15:56.204724Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","title":"Test Adequacy for Metamorphic Testing: Criteria, Measurement, and Implication","version":1},"reference_index":13,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:58.914599Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2412.20692"},"observation_digest":"sha256:767d602fa6c542daa520547ed9ab52277bc7e8038c86f1cf0b02013f4ab851ff","observation_id":"b0800430-5279-44d0-847f-4ded749aa7a5","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.801356Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.787614Z","title":"Theoretical and empirical analyses of the effectiveness of metamorphic relation composition,","venue":null,"work_id":"14690175-a8f6-40ac-9849-9b5b7f3bf09d","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2412.20692","last_updated":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T05:15:56.204724Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","title":"Test Adequacy for Metamorphic Testing: Criteria, Measurement, and Implication","version":1},"reference_index":14,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:58.918135Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2412.20692"},"observation_digest":"sha256:849db7f45365b98eb68e62c986f970b383e2fe5111f676b86916a91a96ecda24","observation_id":"c0abb68d-2e0d-4c49-a8aa-7fe2166c29b0","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.791497Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.777064Z","title":"µMT: A data mutation directed metamorphic relation acquisition methodology,","venue":null,"work_id":"efeed6e3-ca00-43bc-a348-58c6b6ca3ebc","year":2016},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2412.20692","last_updated":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T05:15:56.204724Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","title":"Test Adequacy for Metamorphic Testing: Criteria, Measurement, and Implication","version":1},"reference_index":15,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:58.921539Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2412.20692"},"observation_digest":"sha256:8739daa6fb57db92194d0507f69bf35baa865501e631984fede73da8c07656d5","observation_id":"673bc16f-a724-4a08-aceb-181b636e02aa","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.780880Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.766608Z","title":"METRIC: METamorphic Relation Identification based on the Category-choice framework,","venue":null,"work_id":"13b72b00-2fba-4db6-95e1-691d80de2b13","year":2016},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2412.20692","last_updated":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T05:15:56.204724Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","title":"Test Adequacy for Metamorphic Testing: Criteria, Measurement, and Implication","version":1},"reference_index":16,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:58.924901Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2412.20692"},"observation_digest":"sha256:14e667248e25f5b8edea102b49a8751090cad9a998b000fdc912048507b1c31a","observation_id":"9b97a9d2-2e2c-4a2b-935a-9e3601128d64","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.770441Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.756509Z","title":"METRIC+: A Metamorphic Relation Identification Technique Based on Input plus Output Domains,","venue":null,"work_id":"2b304fae-74f1-4684-bfa4-34b57d87338c","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2412.20692","last_updated":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T05:15:56.204724Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","title":"Test Adequacy for Metamorphic Testing: Criteria, Measurement, and Implication","version":1},"reference_index":17,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:58.928577Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2412.20692"},"observation_digest":"sha256:9f802f42b214c51b0d8c64d542ae151a4746ea8fe8495b95c38895b8fb4ac2eb","observation_id":"8f5871fc-e24f-4b68-8c81-099216dade9a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.760207Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.745299Z","title":"Automated generation of metamorphic relations for query-based systems,","venue":null,"work_id":"e68fb6ca-dde8-4625-b7fd-a6c5119f652c","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2412.20692","last_updated":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T05:15:56.204724Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","title":"Test Adequacy for Metamorphic Testing: Criteria, Measurement, and Implication","version":1},"reference_index":18,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:58.932131Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2412.20692"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e4aa8efd8d9ee28557adbd418028b816c8de39b0666faaceb7e44ed2aaea40e6","observation_id":"15f04c6e-e4b4-4260-9ca1-272091d560bc","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.749349Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.734751Z","title":"How effectively does metamorphic testing alleviate the oracle problem?","venue":null,"work_id":"8864d873-340c-4400-920a-742da418cb20","year":2014},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2412.20692","last_updated":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T05:15:56.204724Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","title":"Test Adequacy for Metamorphic Testing: Criteria, Measurement, and Implication","version":1},"reference_index":19,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:58.935586Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2412.20692"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e67a1a16c38bd30c631bde933b6db361b0b6f8d392f93978dd049d743aa6804b","observation_id":"05ffb1bd-a6b6-4a1b-b33a-2f9508050da1","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.738670Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.724105Z","title":"An empirical study on the selection of good metamorphic relations,","venue":null,"work_id":"9777bd31-d508-4b02-b1a9-94a04dcb5ad4","year":2006},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2412.20692","last_updated":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T05:15:56.204724Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","title":"Test Adequacy for Metamorphic Testing: Criteria, Measurement, and Implication","version":1},"reference_index":20,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:58.939199Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2412.20692"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b695eba806b4239749733e74943e3ee886d4ce30e80456553084e714ead5cd92","observation_id":"3dea52f6-c289-4543-82af-7f83bb92a5fa","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.727882Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.713146Z","title":"Path-directed source test case generation and prioritization in metamorphic testing,","venue":null,"work_id":"0936c1ce-484d-459d-86a6-cebc35e04f3e","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2412.20692","last_updated":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T05:15:56.204724Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","title":"Test Adequacy for Metamorphic Testing: Criteria, Measurement, and Implication","version":1},"reference_index":21,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:58.943047Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2412.20692"},"observation_digest":"sha256:925c3c3777a97b184d3a1a74ebc27c363ee828853987e738b8be82118454f99d","observation_id":"69e7bf99-cbef-4142-8c5f-129fed658311","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.717572Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.703235Z","title":"Generating source inputs for metamorphic testing using dynamic symbolic execution,","venue":null,"work_id":"896ea87d-7aca-4104-8073-ae86e8b32b33","year":2016},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2412.20692","last_updated":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T05:15:56.204724Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","title":"Test Adequacy for Metamorphic Testing: Criteria, Measurement, and Implication","version":1},"reference_index":22,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:58.946510Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2412.20692"},"observation_digest":"sha256:4fcfec287a2fa26438f067b5b652f5bba4c3e196dbb0922025010556e4ca20aa","observation_id":"52fd88ed-e34a-4cbc-8742-4e1cb69eec86","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.706926Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.692744Z","title":"The impact of source test case selection on the effectiveness of meta- morphic testing,","venue":null,"work_id":"62d8b0af-b54d-4bb8-a984-f385b07d495c","year":2016},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2412.20692","last_updated":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T05:15:56.204724Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","title":"Test Adequacy for Metamorphic Testing: Criteria, Measurement, and Implication","version":1},"reference_index":23,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:58.950338Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2412.20692"},"observation_digest":"sha256:70d68e9d385672b55b1d39ed48109f123d26c4c54d420291ff1659524849e684","observation_id":"1625c7b1-371e-45d1-843f-22d992cecd98","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.696521Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.682535Z","title":"Fault detection effectiveness of source test case generation strategies for metamorphic testing,","venue":null,"work_id":"b77c2537-7041-4a76-9fad-cd25895eb7f5","year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2412.20692","last_updated":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T05:15:56.204724Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","title":"Test Adequacy for Metamorphic Testing: Criteria, Measurement, and Implication","version":1},"reference_index":24,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:58.953911Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2412.20692"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f411392d909215e4ee90999c06b533aa02347ad6a6bde0e6109bf9fe436f1899","observation_id":"4198f70d-d979-4e4c-98da-bf8e0a961f4b","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.686056Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.672600Z","title":"Software unit test coverage and adequacy,","venue":null,"work_id":"046af07c-09a8-4692-9472-ee6d1782388f","year":1997},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2412.20692","last_updated":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T05:15:56.204724Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","title":"Test Adequacy for Metamorphic Testing: Criteria, Measurement, and Implication","version":1},"reference_index":25,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:58.957723Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2412.20692"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c34bf7a775f3116ef7c71492517c1654cf57c27ed6e195df37d5347baa54a127","observation_id":"4ae10252-0899-47e5-9f10-ed2bc2a95369","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.676314Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.661567Z","title":"Application of metamorphic testing monitored by test adequacy in a Monte Carlo simulation program,","venue":null,"work_id":"57b9165b-f86d-4b05-8786-b84386886641","year":2017},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2412.20692","last_updated":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T05:15:56.204724Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","title":"Test Adequacy for Metamorphic Testing: Criteria, Measurement, and Implication","version":1},"reference_index":26,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:58.961790Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2412.20692"},"observation_digest":"sha256:0b9cd01c4df9e64708bbe3bf2d7b4ebcc644c2674f06499ae9499ad3b16eeca6","observation_id":"8a9442db-aea6-4470-bf54-e48938b9ba92","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.665228Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.651552Z","title":"Dreaming up metamorphic relations: Experiences from three fuzzer tools,","venue":null,"work_id":"37c93678-9e50-4eaf-bfcc-deae66e3ed61","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2412.20692","last_updated":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T05:15:56.204724Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","title":"Test Adequacy for Metamorphic Testing: Criteria, Measurement, and Implication","version":1},"reference_index":27,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:58.965130Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2412.20692"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f7b0e9ae1ce2d90ee63043799a463eed8c1eeae25f8e12ec206d24f3e4ebfd8d","observation_id":"ac9a2546-665f-4b4f-b9ec-afc1ed3db57f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.655092Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.640821Z","title":"Test adequacy basics,","venue":null,"work_id":"2b20155b-d357-41a0-9ab9-9ee1dce5ad04","year":2013},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2412.20692","last_updated":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T05:15:56.204724Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","title":"Test Adequacy for Metamorphic Testing: Criteria, Measurement, and Implication","version":1},"reference_index":28,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:58.969304Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2412.20692"},"observation_digest":"sha256:479dbb4f6ca6c7c791c9681619fb48e835ce563af73a3a616dacd260b40ae706","observation_id":"47edb547-16de-4319-9c33-b067d9b87efc","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.644757Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.629741Z","title":"Software testing based on formal specifications: a theory and a tool,","venue":null,"work_id":"606ca7e7-0113-4f2c-aefc-9cfa4524ab5d","year":1991},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2412.20692","last_updated":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T05:15:56.204724Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","title":"Test Adequacy for Metamorphic Testing: Criteria, Measurement, and Implication","version":1},"reference_index":29,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:58.972922Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2412.20692"},"observation_digest":"sha256:fbded4ec3e32903622eb3a7f78f18ba6a72ca1c8e385028122a8674a2830668b","observation_id":"4d502a35-8de3-4b41-bcb1-763a74fc4573","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.633409Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.619311Z","title":"Test adequacy and program mutation,","venue":null,"work_id":"90b0cdaa-969e-491b-bde2-57e3841395c9","year":1989},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2412.20692","last_updated":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T05:15:56.204724Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","title":"Test Adequacy for Metamorphic Testing: Criteria, Measurement, and Implication","version":1},"reference_index":30,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:58.976210Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2412.20692"},"observation_digest":"sha256:0f75935e3a1958872350d1c5e354e8e94424fc85456fffe4a54422de64d6190a","observation_id":"3e28d198-878a-4c11-986e-bc58f60fa95d","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.622920Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.608726Z","title":"An assessment of operational coverage as both an adequacy and a selection criterion for operational profile based testing,","venue":null,"work_id":"60515e74-33e0-4ff5-a5bc-9d14f66d3ac8","year":2017},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2412.20692","last_updated":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T05:15:56.204724Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","title":"Test Adequacy for Metamorphic Testing: Criteria, Measurement, and Implication","version":1},"reference_index":31,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:58.979610Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2412.20692"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e2a268efe774c8f6a5c72dd287e5a2e432a46fa4706427f7f8df576a937f904d","observation_id":"21b08621-1e7d-4483-ae6b-e720176cc92a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.612383Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.598866Z","title":"Metamorphic testing: A review of challenges and opportunities,","venue":null,"work_id":"bdc989ca-31b5-41ce-83df-86985fed0225","year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2412.20692","last_updated":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T05:15:56.204724Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","title":"Test Adequacy for Metamorphic Testing: Criteria, Measurement, and Implication","version":1},"reference_index":32,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:58.984094Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2412.20692"},"observation_digest":"sha256:5733ffc62e00bf7f2e82c9b23bb4fc61e5d2a8a276827c5d757849824abdabc8","observation_id":"dbffce47-3ec3-4dd0-8cd1-bae5eb592bd4","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.602403Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.588973Z","title":"Debugging and testing,","venue":null,"work_id":"2e0a892b-9350-4752-8b5c-1cbf4834cf9b","year":1975},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2412.20692","last_updated":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T05:15:56.204724Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","title":"Test Adequacy for Metamorphic Testing: Criteria, Measurement, and Implication","version":1},"reference_index":33,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:58.987643Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2412.20692"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f14553f8c8712363356103a8339af61539d9c18245d0005ff58a682e4f95227a","observation_id":"55280e2e-ea17-4db8-9e88-7460c3f76316","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.592549Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.578695Z","title":"Toward a theory of test data selection,","venue":null,"work_id":"d043bfbd-82b4-4657-b504-35690c2e0d61","year":1975},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2412.20692","last_updated":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T05:15:56.204724Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","title":"Test Adequacy for Metamorphic Testing: Criteria, Measurement, and Implication","version":1},"reference_index":34,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:58.991008Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2412.20692"},"observation_digest":"sha256:1e2780479c3aabd6d3f0011226b258bd798e4469d4688002ad8ab1576d285f01","observation_id":"7d3b3a03-8a5c-40c3-9f7e-6385da18baed","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.582283Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.568236Z","title":"Axiomatizing software test data adequacy,","venue":null,"work_id":"fe6dc336-2954-4d21-93b8-7a313085bd8d","year":1986},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2412.20692","last_updated":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T05:15:56.204724Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","title":"Test Adequacy for Metamorphic Testing: Criteria, Measurement, and Implication","version":1},"reference_index":35,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:58.994779Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2412.20692"},"observation_digest":"sha256:8454002b6531e56576c71ae1c5ee0c694a4eb290074091e120da63d75eedef2a","observation_id":"96d636ef-baaa-466f-a0a9-a924a8ff4630","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.572139Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.556218Z","title":"Test data adequacy measurement,","venue":null,"work_id":"7b0180ff-f922-454a-b409-b71380c504fc","year":1993},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2412.20692","last_updated":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T05:15:56.204724Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","title":"Test Adequacy for Metamorphic Testing: Criteria, Measurement, and Implication","version":1},"reference_index":36,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:58.998272Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2412.20692"},"observation_digest":"sha256:fe78a5c659e6ead53b81a02db5bf67dd527c36d75b13c569e84c022aaf779ad6","observation_id":"6fdd07aa-9fca-488b-bc60-2ebffeebabf0","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.560594Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.544060Z","title":"Hints on Test Data Selection: Help for the Practicing Programmer,","venue":null,"work_id":"5fd35d50-2461-43ac-8663-ac78b84f5078","year":1978},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2412.20692","last_updated":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T05:15:56.204724Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","title":"Test Adequacy for Metamorphic Testing: Criteria, Measurement, and Implication","version":1},"reference_index":37,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.001902Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2412.20692"},"observation_digest":"sha256:d989bb258f1c185e235d45a0dda9dc8c8394ce8458100ace05007ea9a6eacab9","observation_id":"8b0f4921-8399-439c-8075-2067e6bb6953","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.547951Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.532843Z","title":"An applicable family of data flow testing criteria,","venue":null,"work_id":"89636b6b-66a9-40c1-80ff-34ba9a1375bb","year":1988},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2412.20692","last_updated":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T05:15:56.204724Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","title":"Test Adequacy for Metamorphic Testing: Criteria, Measurement, and Implication","version":1},"reference_index":38,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.004990Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2412.20692"},"observation_digest":"sha256:031c644188790cdc138edea899fd2e1a12535e3956befc4e9e3aa3e110ede6e5","observation_id":"dbfbd655-f084-4689-9fca-afd1f7b9485e","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.536822Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.522138Z","title":"Industry practice of coverage-guided enterprise linux kernel fuzzing,","venue":null,"work_id":"16610452-891f-4a83-986c-c235ddf979ad","year":2019},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2412.20692","last_updated":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T05:15:56.204724Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","title":"Test Adequacy for Metamorphic Testing: Criteria, Measurement, and Implication","version":1},"reference_index":39,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.008782Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2412.20692"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c096d5d287c9323de0be4e358d1e923d7d35a85f79ab243d37264401d89c8bc7","observation_id":"5959aa72-a622-45de-8316-fff1b637f522","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.525761Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.511727Z","title":"Industry practices and challenges for the evolvability assurance of microservices,","venue":null,"work_id":"6e901167-7979-4c26-91f7-12c2fcb2cef0","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2412.20692","last_updated":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T05:15:56.204724Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","title":"Test Adequacy for Metamorphic Testing: Criteria, Measurement, and Implication","version":1},"reference_index":40,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.012173Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2412.20692"},"observation_digest":"sha256:17b60f789819da26d229aaae2a326343995166289c726b0acf2403925e17c5f0","observation_id":"c537769f-6c7c-4e39-bef0-9bdefd08cda8","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.515974Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.501715Z","title":"A cost-effective random testing method for programs with non-numeric inputs,","venue":null,"work_id":"880a1c73-95d0-4e62-9441-c88c3129be2d","year":2016},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2412.20692","last_updated":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T05:15:56.204724Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","title":"Test Adequacy for Metamorphic Testing: Criteria, Measurement, and Implication","version":1},"reference_index":41,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.015567Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2412.20692"},"observation_digest":"sha256:1034313258d2530fd5b0849d656945b965047c2794e076e7729a993eed448fe6","observation_id":"d6fdc842-af16-4b80-a2dc-1dbf0344cc71","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.505273Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.490849Z","title":"muJava: a mutation system for java,","venue":null,"work_id":"74bcbaf5-ca98-46d2-b82e-e5a3ff1a74af","year":2006},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2412.20692","last_updated":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T05:15:56.204724Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","title":"Test Adequacy for Metamorphic Testing: Criteria, Measurement, and Implication","version":1},"reference_index":42,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.018882Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2412.20692"},"observation_digest":"sha256:97572095e1ef111e2b1727ecad11a30d7107eab916b0085c9d7ee5a369d2b266","observation_id":"0ce5a781-94a3-4d09-8b65-8301549cb5c5","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.495037Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.480720Z","title":"Proteum/IM 2.0: An integrated mutation testing environment,","venue":null,"work_id":"4584d979-1e87-4ed8-a9e0-d7a7ef962b76","year":2001},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2412.20692","last_updated":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T05:15:56.204724Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","title":"Test Adequacy for Metamorphic Testing: Criteria, Measurement, and Implication","version":1},"reference_index":43,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.022596Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2412.20692"},"observation_digest":"sha256:0ce8c079abaa9cfa6b23a659dfef58fa0b4d06f41713809440ac8837f109cf39","observation_id":"770422a7-f2ea-41dc-8d9b-1227c2ce9a24","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.484315Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.469865Z","title":"Heuristics for determining equivalence of program mutations,","venue":null,"work_id":"12031f93-e1c0-45a8-856f-81b93da3c2e2","year":1979},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2412.20692","last_updated":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T05:15:56.204724Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","title":"Test Adequacy for Metamorphic Testing: Criteria, Measurement, and Implication","version":1},"reference_index":44,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.026118Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2412.20692"},"observation_digest":"sha256:01b7c52ec868ee72ccdf880aa34b5e99d3337d5e27a65e6f96882cf8c6819ed0","observation_id":"cad61662-e2d2-4e28-bd55-4a1b4ff7ac59","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.473934Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.458106Z","title":"Detecting equivalent mutants and the feasible path problem,","venue":null,"work_id":"5ccabffd-1c78-4f96-8ed5-5f08ff9f14fe","year":1996},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2412.20692","last_updated":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T05:15:56.204724Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","title":"Test Adequacy for Metamorphic Testing: Criteria, Measurement, and Implication","version":1},"reference_index":45,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.029806Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2412.20692"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e27f8b9e89d15e7fb78d18bc8355dbcdc76a448e8c69aef4bec91d466ba02bdf","observation_id":"efbbe82c-a7aa-4a1a-88c8-84a924560d65","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.462818Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.447211Z","title":"A Study of Equivalent and Stubborn Mutation Operators Using Human Analysis of Equivalence,","venue":null,"work_id":"2bd0b4f8-48a4-4cee-a6d8-fa68c6f8fa92","year":2014},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2412.20692","last_updated":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T05:15:56.204724Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","title":"Test Adequacy for Metamorphic Testing: Criteria, Measurement, and Implication","version":1},"reference_index":46,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.033524Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2412.20692"},"observation_digest":"sha256:7504a75c9c0769a3f7adceb5133737b53f8a93770c2d2ae7728365a017a015eb","observation_id":"786e35a9-aeba-48e9-aef6-2320864d342f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.450944Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.435850Z","title":"Enhancing partition testing through output variation,","venue":null,"work_id":"dcbf7b14-d6b8-4a82-8f87-58303e7920af","year":2015},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2412.20692","last_updated":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T05:15:56.204724Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","title":"Test Adequacy for Metamorphic Testing: Criteria, Measurement, and Implication","version":1},"reference_index":47,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.037127Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2412.20692"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e23d5f22a19be011650293e2fd55c0673aa38ee2404a44c80389b04232180ecc","observation_id":"b0ce29c1-9ca4-4139-981e-77eb8ebcbe53","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.440026Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.425480Z","title":"Using formal methods to derive test frames in category-partition testing,","venue":null,"work_id":"fe48a598-1677-4569-a6fe-50d107f7cfaf","year":1994},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2412.20692","last_updated":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T05:15:56.204724Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","title":"Test Adequacy for Metamorphic Testing: Criteria, Measurement, and Implication","version":1},"reference_index":48,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.041001Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2412.20692"},"observation_digest":"sha256:d93bda0316ade3d1cc4384d274688aca93882d69e75088f18bd291b84c30b0f0","observation_id":"77d75ddf-a9ec-4bfd-b136-ffa7448ad669","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.429287Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.415260Z","title":"Jacoco java code coverage library,","venue":null,"work_id":"17ae8007-3bb7-4edc-bab4-968d2e39e256","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2412.20692","last_updated":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T05:15:56.204724Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","title":"Test Adequacy for Metamorphic Testing: Criteria, Measurement, and Implication","version":1},"reference_index":49,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.044686Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2412.20692"},"observation_digest":"sha256:15cee336605beb33422a8e675e4f62cef14bf953b4b053ef3717d479b312df2e","observation_id":"26bcbf8d-60ed-4dbd-892d-c79b5b03aa75","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.418909Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.403514Z","title":"gcov—a test coverage program,","venue":null,"work_id":"e7b4c43b-2c3d-4762-8efc-6b46c78cb25f","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2412.20692","last_updated":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T05:15:56.204724Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","title":"Test Adequacy for Metamorphic Testing: Criteria, Measurement, and Implication","version":1},"reference_index":50,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.047956Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2412.20692"},"observation_digest":"sha256:1b4f7998ab6138f8cd74497e44c48ab2f808aba83be1339ca9d666f42ec86012","observation_id":"f0cf3c9d-ba98-4dd6-a848-8ead4d6523b1","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.407402Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.379180Z","title":"Evosuite: Automatic test suite generation for object-oriented software,","venue":null,"work_id":"a267470d-c92c-432e-9c0e-68b1d0ec6a34","year":2011},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2412.20692","last_updated":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T05:15:56.204724Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","title":"Test Adequacy for Metamorphic Testing: Criteria, Measurement, and Implication","version":1},"reference_index":51,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.055594Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2412.20692"},"observation_digest":"sha256:afb4e8a69224d7ef2fc52f93123c1055475a34931756c5a50755556299158802","observation_id":"df26f34d-d19e-4b9c-ad65-b8bfdf2586c7","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.383626Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.365509Z","title":"Using mutation analysis for assessing and comparing testing coverage criteria,","venue":null,"work_id":"3a0ac44d-88b6-4d5e-9268-b7d84df316bf","year":2006},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2412.20692","last_updated":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T05:15:56.204724Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","title":"Test Adequacy for Metamorphic Testing: Criteria, Measurement, and Implication","version":1},"reference_index":52,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.059544Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2412.20692"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e2e8e8da95f53871a42996c57865f89fad8435687fdcf97db8b46946b2037f4e","observation_id":"3b767003-a165-45ca-8c54-3a6e179ed739","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.370130Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.352023Z","title":"A theoretical and empirical study of diversity-aware mutation adequacy criterion,","venue":null,"work_id":"47806832-8e91-4a33-a6f0-aee6438f6487","year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2412.20692","last_updated":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T05:15:56.204724Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","title":"Test Adequacy for Metamorphic Testing: Criteria, Measurement, and Implication","version":1},"reference_index":53,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.063286Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2412.20692"},"observation_digest":"sha256:0a4b97feab6d0370a732e5b08b8d2e619a19b32d237aa25de1eb025472efe83a","observation_id":"ea5de482-9473-4bfa-adb0-3f0fcde2abc0","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.357235Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.339278Z","title":"Metamorphic slice: an application in spectrum-based fault localization,","venue":null,"work_id":"3de9464e-8bfc-4681-884f-5b8ed216948a","year":2013},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2412.20692","last_updated":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T05:15:56.204724Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","title":"Test Adequacy for Metamorphic Testing: Criteria, Measurement, and Implication","version":1},"reference_index":54,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.067195Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2412.20692"},"observation_digest":"sha256:9cf7da636f3bcfbc989679f43a8f60338bca820420d9364daac45f419e90d192","observation_id":"9f31db01-a16f-4d07-8b1e-13edd9f6fa4d","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.343699Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.325343Z","title":"Feedback-directed meta- morphic testing,","venue":null,"work_id":"7c02f23b-a991-4a4e-bf6b-00508c582131","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2412.20692","last_updated":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T05:15:56.204724Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","title":"Test Adequacy for Metamorphic Testing: Criteria, Measurement, and Implication","version":1},"reference_index":55,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.070903Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2412.20692"},"observation_digest":"sha256:65d19d32e8c55963bd462f89c20db266b9fa8938e4da0e56165919cc0049775c","observation_id":"1e7d5d99-1062-4079-8bfe-ac479f4b21e7","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.330240Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.313044Z","title":"An optimized method for generating cases of metamorphic testing,","venue":null,"work_id":"af59db60-0aac-4203-bcd4-00f5e5e9e98c","year":2012},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2412.20692","last_updated":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T05:15:56.204724Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","title":"Test Adequacy for Metamorphic Testing: Criteria, Measurement, and Implication","version":1},"reference_index":56,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.074366Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2412.20692"},"observation_digest":"sha256:35d58131f83da13c98c53cc647f6109f1e07619aab6f22b8a158e466e76ab273","observation_id":"dcbdb53b-9e05-4324-84eb-ebd1dab2b470","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.317729Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.299779Z","title":"Effectively metamorphic testing based on program path analysis,","venue":null,"work_id":"5184b3cc-b614-4cc5-9f22-079baf7787f7","year":2009},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2412.20692","last_updated":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T05:15:56.204724Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","title":"Test Adequacy for Metamorphic Testing: Criteria, Measurement, and Implication","version":1},"reference_index":57,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.077781Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2412.20692"},"observation_digest":"sha256:15db215f50dd88aaa0c47e8a70118e9b6284acdfcf25d43ebaed6c5e2764d451","observation_id":"b1c42b31-e862-4fd0-96d6-b87d42ebb85c","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.304769Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.081437Z","title":"A survey on metamorphic testing,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2016},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2412.20692","last_updated":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T05:15:56.204724Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","title":"Test Adequacy for Metamorphic Testing: Criteria, Measurement, and Implication","version":1},"reference_index":58,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.081437Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2412.20692"},"observation_digest":"sha256:64aa42654e254d5e58a3cf508306932c6485279412d15f198645bc9bec029011","observation_id":"a84bc9aa-d471-4095-9fb3-23a42e672c2b","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.081437Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.278915Z","title":"Enhance combinatorial testing with metamorphic relations,","venue":null,"work_id":"c9bb60a7-c5d3-41df-9e91-4ccded1189e0","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2412.20692","last_updated":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T05:15:56.204724Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","title":"Test Adequacy for Metamorphic Testing: Criteria, Measurement, and Implication","version":1},"reference_index":59,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.084933Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2412.20692"},"observation_digest":"sha256:2fbb637a907747da246acbc75b0d3ca93d8fb7999d6f865dc5124d95fd8c8fb9","observation_id":"f4c07b98-e7e7-4dde-a340-2ed44c32c0c8","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.283518Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.266788Z","title":"Metamorphic relation au- tomation: Rationale, challenges, and solution directions,","venue":null,"work_id":"991fdb90-4cf0-4093-95c8-1076c58b72bf","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2412.20692","last_updated":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T05:15:56.204724Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","title":"Test Adequacy for Metamorphic Testing: Criteria, Measurement, and Implication","version":1},"reference_index":60,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.088538Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2412.20692"},"observation_digest":"sha256:d05e5ce37f5a7dbdecb6c818bb89d64c52e9654f07932d8d9a97e10d1b178b58","observation_id":"84abcb3f-3f50-417a-8b92-b4889feb7ec9","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.271098Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.253276Z","title":"Metamorphic relations for enhancing system understanding and use,","venue":null,"work_id":"0fe0560f-bc69-4beb-8341-ee4792fc9223","year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2412.20692","last_updated":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T05:15:56.204724Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","title":"Test Adequacy for Metamorphic Testing: Criteria, Measurement, and Implication","version":1},"reference_index":61,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.091859Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2412.20692"},"observation_digest":"sha256:71fcf319c3ae1b3c56724cc7f1d26cb8dbcaa918feb91dcd4a49e4de49fdd377","observation_id":"56bb0984-7705-413e-a53d-0090c782c900","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.258258Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.241172Z","title":"Predicting metamorphic relations for testing scientific software: a machine learning approach using graph kernels,","venue":null,"work_id":"4ec3365c-0e54-4d2a-a2f0-e9f20962ffe9","year":2016},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2412.20692","last_updated":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T05:15:56.204724Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","title":"Test Adequacy for Metamorphic Testing: Criteria, Measurement, and Implication","version":1},"reference_index":62,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.095419Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2412.20692"},"observation_digest":"sha256:edbbdb5362af6e60f9601d8e96ecef2d68398838d8a27cac77af4c2a00a61734","observation_id":"a04a0ce1-737c-4635-a4b8-54fc2958bd42","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.245116Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.228208Z","title":"Mrpredt: Using text mining for metamorphic relation prediction,","venue":null,"work_id":"f9b6fad2-a40a-45aa-bd3e-4bff79dcf61a","year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2412.20692","last_updated":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T05:15:56.204724Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","title":"Test Adequacy for Metamorphic Testing: Criteria, Measurement, and Implication","version":1},"reference_index":63,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.099082Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2412.20692"},"observation_digest":"sha256:43876b61e40027814dfa1daac08fac7544cb3ca6654bd1efd1969848557151bf","observation_id":"f789fc47-7f69-4a90-9cb8-71b71f8333c7","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.232564Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.215581Z","title":"Automatic discovery and cleansing of numerical metamorphic relations,","venue":null,"work_id":"8519fc7a-f0ef-4e8a-aa62-58e3cdcb72ec","year":2019},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2412.20692","last_updated":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T05:15:56.204724Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","title":"Test Adequacy for Metamorphic Testing: Criteria, Measurement, and Implication","version":1},"reference_index":64,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.102836Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2412.20692"},"observation_digest":"sha256:81097cf5d051257eda888b79e95dc9be6828567645b3ab2a6fdce2f7b24fc9a5","observation_id":"798356bb-c9f9-4ab5-b683-ece7166358ee","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.219874Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.202404Z","title":"Datamorphic testing: A method for testing intelligent applications,","venue":null,"work_id":"30276a80-86e2-4399-89fe-257edabc5f21","year":2019},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2412.20692","last_updated":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T05:15:56.204724Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","title":"Test Adequacy for Metamorphic Testing: Criteria, Measurement, and Implication","version":1},"reference_index":65,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.106416Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2412.20692"},"observation_digest":"sha256:dc3255cbda909a4fcf5ca5b9423cf657d6f0f7a70ea3a6e6a6bd8f15a493292d","observation_id":"6b6a21e7-6cb3-4fb2-9d23-0ee7765c565a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.206823Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.189994Z","title":"MeMo: Automatically identifying metamorphic relations in Javadoc comments for test automation,","venue":null,"work_id":"b9fddcbd-85e1-41cc-82d1-a02deb80c578","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2412.20692","last_updated":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T05:15:56.204724Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","title":"Test Adequacy for Metamorphic Testing: Criteria, Measurement, and Implication","version":1},"reference_index":66,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.110182Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2412.20692"},"observation_digest":"sha256:32df396ee0e8ec3ff6ad822b3118209d6aa989e4cc61037a2ed59d1cf8f9f4ad","observation_id":"8a23fb0e-afda-408e-b0f4-b663bf1a51d3","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.194235Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.176892Z","title":"An iterative metamorphic testing technique for web services and case studies,","venue":null,"work_id":"5e5e29c5-a19e-41c6-8bd5-fbb249953cbe","year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2412.20692","last_updated":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T05:15:56.204724Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","title":"Test Adequacy for Metamorphic Testing: Criteria, Measurement, and Implication","version":1},"reference_index":67,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.113719Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2412.20692"},"observation_digest":"sha256:53796d1f7aefacb88c85edba091a80231bdb0f59115b5b1fb3a98deae24e4604","observation_id":"2fd23663-1381-41b7-a99e-bb4740885f52","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.181274Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.164574Z","title":"Metamorphic testing and testing with special values,","venue":null,"work_id":"4f10b841-9f38-400a-9be0-a9551d1e0bed","year":2004},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2412.20692","last_updated":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T05:15:56.204724Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","title":"Test Adequacy for Metamorphic Testing: Criteria, Measurement, and Implication","version":1},"reference_index":68,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.117408Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2412.20692"},"observation_digest":"sha256:0a3dc0ea8a4bcd1206284dc9d0b733fc4449d7ea589991a66604990f49d1f56d","observation_id":"427166bd-273e-498e-9197-b4b7a3f6239d","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.168761Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.150158Z","title":"Adaptive metamorphic testing with contex- tual bandits,","venue":null,"work_id":"0e689c83-e136-4f0f-bd13-f03851b10262","year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2412.20692","last_updated":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T05:15:56.204724Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","title":"Test Adequacy for Metamorphic Testing: Criteria, Measurement, and Implication","version":1},"reference_index":69,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.121095Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2412.20692"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b58feb281aea66bc3ebca73e7ab5b727eb206bdabb281426db535d9421902b0e","observation_id":"9c12513c-3197-4b0c-9a19-528b13757aed","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.156056Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.392026Z","title":"Available: https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Gcov.html","venue":null,"work_id":"7e428acb-ca02-4f6c-b517-8916e20e0184","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2412.20692","last_updated":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T05:15:56.204724Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","title":"Test Adequacy for Metamorphic Testing: Criteria, Measurement, and Implication","version":1},"reference_index":2022,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.051831Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2412.20692"},"observation_digest":"sha256:83c5815c88e1f9921bfe07d59e2619f945655511b73341569e3a7c79012bea8e","observation_id":"f7f21d1e-87a5-48cc-b21f-51076d558209","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T23:17:59.396196Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}}],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2412.20692","last_updated":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","latest_version":1,"primary_category":"cs.SE","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T05:15:56.204724Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-30T04:00:39Z","title":"Test Adequacy for Metamorphic Testing: Criteria, Measurement, and Implication"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":70,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":1,"verified_exact":0,"verified_fuzzy":69},"total_outbound_references":70},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 16 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 70 of 70 outbound references and 2 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2412.20692."}