{"as_of":"2026-08-20T10:16:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:98f48aa600863300e7b8c47046258ef220afd0b777639ac61d67da574207d850","coverage":[{"denominator":24,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":24,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T22:49:03.318606Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":29,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":29,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":5,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":5,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-09T22:03:18.849179Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"pith","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T17:33:52.118494Z","state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.00655","last_updated":"2024-12-31T21:47:46Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T12:12:03.522663Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-31T21:47:46Z","title":"Finding Missed Code Size Optimizations in Compilers using LLMs","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2501.00655","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T22:03:18.849179Z","title":"and Cummins, C","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18916","last_updated":"2026-06-23T21:39:56Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-19T21:59:54.833345Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-31T06:34:47Z","title":"LLM Program Optimization via Retrieval Augmented Search","version":2},"reference_index":9,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-09T22:03:18.849179Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2501.00655","citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18916"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b0d64f6d46d50b7164d2513e432d33daa8e1aa2d4e5850bcfd306123dfc3d6c5","observation_id":"1dde5453-edc8-484a-9457-f2c79609a716","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T22:03:18.849179Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.00655","last_updated":"2024-12-31T21:47:46Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T12:12:03.522663Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-31T21:47:46Z","title":"Finding Missed Code Size Optimizations in Compilers using LLMs","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2501.00655","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T12:41:35.577750Z","title":"Finding missed code size optimizations in compilers using llms","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.15701","last_updated":"2025-05-30T00:26:10Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T12:12:52.080263Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-30T00:26:10Z","title":"Compiler-R1: Towards Agentic Compiler Auto-tuning with Reinforcement Learning","version":1},"reference_index":17,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T12:41:35.577750Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2501.00655","citing_paper":"/paper/2506.15701"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f25caad9f1dae47cfe8b7102b3010472a1abf7879b20076bb1d6cef0f6846a49","observation_id":"4577dcfa-ee1c-4094-82a9-9d63e2b4e8da","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T12:41:35.577750Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.00655","last_updated":"2024-12-31T21:47:46Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T12:12:03.522663Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-31T21:47:46Z","title":"Finding Missed Code Size Optimizations in Compilers using LLMs","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2501.00655","doi":null,"metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"2501.00655","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T17:33:52.118494Z","title":"Finding Missed Code Size Optimizations in Compilers using LLMs","venue":"cs.SE","work_id":"1a1954bb-8741-4d7a-9060-8ce97d30fe96","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2508.16129","last_updated":"2026-07-29T14:45:36Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T03:45:59.735789Z","submitted_at":"2025-08-22T06:47:30Z","title":"Bridging the Gap in Ophthalmic AI: MM-Retinal-Reason Dataset and OphthaReason Model toward Dynamic Multimodal Reasoning","version":3},"reference_index":17,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T17:33:46.904688Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2501.00655","citing_paper":"/paper/2508.16129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:7a8cf5e47d721c5275cf61e525ea5ec56d4f1d51fa101c00f8b32c3af657aacf","observation_id":"aad1d5b7-9eb2-4542-b78e-48d3d645a726","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T17:33:52.236222Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:54.927442+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.00655","last_updated":"2024-12-31T21:47:46Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T12:12:03.522663Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-31T21:47:46Z","title":"Finding Missed Code Size Optimizations in Compilers using LLMs","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2501.00655","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-04T09:51:33.393108Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2510.13176","last_updated":"2026-07-31T08:50:43Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T12:12:51.500049Z","submitted_at":"2025-10-15T06:01:19Z","title":"GRACE: Cluster-Specific Sequence Reuse for Compiler Auto-Tuning","version":2},"reference_index":21,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-04T09:51:33.393108Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2501.00655","citing_paper":"/paper/2510.13176"},"observation_digest":"sha256:430218c5894bcd960cefbb383a2f608036b194cc12aa66ee0c3793b837ae0eb1","observation_id":"778790dc-e58e-47fb-a158-f2f56d2a3cc7","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-04T09:51:33.393108Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.00655","last_updated":"2024-12-31T21:47:46Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T12:12:03.522663Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-31T21:47:46Z","title":"Finding Missed Code Size Optimizations in Compilers using LLMs","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2501.00655","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T07:44:29.251570Z","title":"Finding missed code size optimizations in compilers using llms,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.02684","last_updated":"2026-07-02T18:25:29Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T10:23:57.292769Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-02T18:25:29Z","title":"Can Coding Agents Implement Missed Compiler Optimizations? Evaluating LLM Agents on LLVM Peephole Optimizations","version":1},"reference_index":45,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T07:44:29.251570Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2501.00655","citing_paper":"/paper/2607.02684"},"observation_digest":"sha256:094f2df3afe7e110bd1322802c1855f29b87d1080ef62b89bc9d9d92f637eb40","observation_id":"58742110-2cba-4188-9a20-e332c8f92f8c","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T07:44:29.251570Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}}],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2501.00655/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2501.00655/integrity","json":"/paper/2501.00655/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2501.00655"},"outbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T22:49:03.188092Z","title":"write newline","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.00655","last_updated":"2024-12-31T21:47:46Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T12:12:03.522663Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-31T21:47:46Z","title":"Finding Missed Code Size Optimizations in Compilers using LLMs","version":1},"reference_index":1,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T22:49:03.188092Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.00655"},"observation_digest":"sha256:46e98038804340d2024c714ad2fc6d4f788363ee10192b4fa07281d0346d24de","observation_id":"b5830cec-a0be-46b0-a79a-d705c4d17c18","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T22:49:03.188092Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T22:49:03.765071Z","title":"A survey of compiler testing // CSUR","venue":null,"work_id":"38d8e91a-1392-4610-867c-f9b8e0a28441","year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.00655","last_updated":"2024-12-31T21:47:46Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T12:12:03.522663Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-31T21:47:46Z","title":"Finding Missed Code Size Optimizations in Compilers using LLMs","version":1},"reference_index":2,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T22:49:03.195320Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.00655"},"observation_digest":"sha256:4109887b73244475e1e9ba7abd587f4ed6cb82c6c610bf8418b750977a29a173","observation_id":"f2ede133-b503-48ba-895e-0a85747a055d","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T22:49:03.770507Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:54.927442+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T22:49:03.747480Z","title":"Compiler fuzzing through deep learning // ISSTA","venue":null,"work_id":"f3eda4db-223d-4861-89f0-4e1e1fd0ac79","year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.00655","last_updated":"2024-12-31T21:47:46Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T12:12:03.522663Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-31T21:47:46Z","title":"Finding Missed Code Size Optimizations in Compilers using LLMs","version":1},"reference_index":3,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T22:49:03.201070Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.00655"},"observation_digest":"sha256:5902a6e6d2f261899bae2b458f9fcc70d7f6d8879431e55a3a9f352761458f00","observation_id":"e0d34164-d5ae-4f53-806c-b5cfc4d2c113","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T22:49:03.753264Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:54.927442+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T22:49:03.729072Z","title":"Large Language Models Are Zero-Shot Fuzzers: Fuzzing Deep-Learning Libraries via Large Language Models // ISSTA","venue":null,"work_id":"aafd0ebc-c08a-4727-bd5e-794cf364f16e","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.00655","last_updated":"2024-12-31T21:47:46Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T12:12:03.522663Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-31T21:47:46Z","title":"Finding Missed Code Size Optimizations in Compilers using LLMs","version":1},"reference_index":4,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T22:49:03.206426Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.00655"},"observation_digest":"sha256:9d8b3abd00609d60cbb892c4da7906c0dc7b411152b7475bbe3c842c8ccb6ba8","observation_id":"b63c36b7-9533-4886-82cf-8808524bc98c","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T22:49:03.735076Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:54.927442+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2304.02014","last_updated":"2023-04-04T17:59:52Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-19T19:04:40.955576Z","submitted_at":"2023-04-04T17:59:52Z","title":"Large Language Models are Edge-Case Fuzzers: Testing Deep Learning Libraries via FuzzGPT","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2304.02014","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T22:49:03.212479Z","title":"Testing Deep Learning Libraries via FuzzGPT // arXiv:2304.02014","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.00655","last_updated":"2024-12-31T21:47:46Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T12:12:03.522663Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-31T21:47:46Z","title":"Finding Missed Code Size Optimizations in Compilers using LLMs","version":1},"reference_index":5,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T22:49:03.212479Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2304.02014","citing_paper":"/paper/2501.00655"},"observation_digest":"sha256:42292f2ea3bb6fd645f7a76faa1f814bf153ed2e448bf212594b32ec066363d3","observation_id":"7fea61e7-58aa-49ee-8472-eccab263bdab","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T22:49:03.212479Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2407.21783","last_updated":"2024-11-23T23:27:33Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T17:20:44.002518Z","submitted_at":"2024-07-31T17:54:27Z","title":"The Llama 3 Herd of Models","version":3},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2407.21783","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T22:49:03.219272Z","title":"The Llama 3 Herd of Models // arXiv:2407.21783","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.00655","last_updated":"2024-12-31T21:47:46Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T12:12:03.522663Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-31T21:47:46Z","title":"Finding Missed Code Size Optimizations in Compilers using LLMs","version":1},"reference_index":6,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T22:49:03.219272Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2407.21783","citing_paper":"/paper/2501.00655"},"observation_digest":"sha256:10814c113119c922ff991ca1436f2f6a479230a197ed2abb9aa5d34b8624b38e","observation_id":"240a857e-bd39-4ada-b474-b6d491c97750","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T22:49:03.219272Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T22:49:03.708559Z","title":"Learn&fuzz: Machine learning for input fuzzing // 2017 32nd IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE)","venue":null,"work_id":"75c4181a-0360-4ffd-8849-dac4e5319f7d","year":2017},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.00655","last_updated":"2024-12-31T21:47:46Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T12:12:03.522663Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-31T21:47:46Z","title":"Finding Missed Code Size Optimizations in Compilers using LLMs","version":1},"reference_index":7,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T22:49:03.225067Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.00655"},"observation_digest":"sha256:6a8d50496066203b969616347096c3459d14588b9aee40887d990302f03ed011","observation_id":"4d3d92ee-2960-42d3-acb9-4f048c886caa","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T22:49:03.714662Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:54.927442+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T22:49:03.689904Z","title":"Reordering Functions in Mobiles Apps for Reduced Size and Faster Start-Up // TECS","venue":null,"work_id":"7489ad7a-d38d-47fd-a700-31edfe2e73e2","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.00655","last_updated":"2024-12-31T21:47:46Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T12:12:03.522663Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-31T21:47:46Z","title":"Finding Missed Code Size Optimizations in Compilers using LLMs","version":1},"reference_index":8,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T22:49:03.230720Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.00655"},"observation_digest":"sha256:86406ef8871e6d269aa368286226596a26ae3548a4e00b9f238e3df4020489d6","observation_id":"0327955c-ff90-43fb-94fc-23d8d835d9e6","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T22:49:03.695555Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:54.927442+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2308.10620","last_updated":"2024-04-10T08:41:22Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T12:11:19.164077Z","submitted_at":"2023-08-21T10:37:49Z","title":"Large Language Models for Software Engineering: A Systematic Literature Review","version":6},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2308.10620","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T22:49:03.235561Z","title":"Large Language Models for Software Engineering: A Systematic Literature Review // arXiv:2308.10620","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.00655","last_updated":"2024-12-31T21:47:46Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T12:12:03.522663Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-31T21:47:46Z","title":"Finding Missed Code Size Optimizations in Compilers using LLMs","version":1},"reference_index":9,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T22:49:03.235561Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2308.10620","citing_paper":"/paper/2501.00655"},"observation_digest":"sha256:7fb3f84fe93625f1fa4b38cdf7a3324fefb7b66f66c06a7090ca4579c3acb3a1","observation_id":"9ef4fcd9-24e8-4e0e-ba6b-0f480cdd2faa","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T22:49:03.235561Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T22:49:03.673665Z","title":"LLVM: A Compilation Framework for Lifelong Program Analysis & Transformation // CGO","venue":null,"work_id":"4f1f85f5-e424-4af2-8da9-5e0e2df91317","year":2004},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.00655","last_updated":"2024-12-31T21:47:46Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T12:12:03.522663Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-31T21:47:46Z","title":"Finding Missed Code Size Optimizations in Compilers using LLMs","version":1},"reference_index":10,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T22:49:03.241612Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.00655"},"observation_digest":"sha256:317b2e20c6b01822700e4bbe89164f4a67e233ce56c0bdc4bbb22928abbdd6f8","observation_id":"9610259d-078b-49cb-a9ed-c155cddf5c0d","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T22:49:03.679014Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:54.927442+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T22:49:03.656580Z","title":"Compiler validation via equivalence modulo inputs // ACM Sigplan Notices","venue":null,"work_id":"30f767ea-c855-4f4e-85dd-ba800ccde6ee","year":2014},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.00655","last_updated":"2024-12-31T21:47:46Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T12:12:03.522663Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-31T21:47:46Z","title":"Finding Missed Code Size Optimizations in Compilers using LLMs","version":1},"reference_index":11,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T22:49:03.246826Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.00655"},"observation_digest":"sha256:3fb8bfb35c4503361d349d2d8720f0fe06001a36097de3e2dc7e0c186ec6c49f","observation_id":"7e85c0a9-302f-4704-a059-63f4f56d433a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T22:49:03.662111Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:54.927442+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T22:49:03.640211Z","title":"Efficient profile-guided size optimization for native mobile applications // CC","venue":null,"work_id":"022d398e-2782-4086-9355-6116dbcdc3fa","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.00655","last_updated":"2024-12-31T21:47:46Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T12:12:03.522663Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-31T21:47:46Z","title":"Finding Missed Code Size Optimizations in Compilers using LLMs","version":1},"reference_index":12,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T22:49:03.251919Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.00655"},"observation_digest":"sha256:64c97ee0b1c57232c454ddfe8ace10eb89ac3f7857c4af000c35e65797f15eac","observation_id":"4486d9ba-f3b8-4bc1-ab01-9c53669f3f6a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T22:49:03.645595Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:54.927442+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T22:49:03.622539Z","title":"Optimistic and Scalable Global Function Merging // LCTES","venue":null,"work_id":"cabd54d6-5b15-4aa6-a805-1eaa82de3e59","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.00655","last_updated":"2024-12-31T21:47:46Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T12:12:03.522663Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-31T21:47:46Z","title":"Finding Missed Code Size Optimizations in Compilers using LLMs","version":1},"reference_index":13,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T22:49:03.257235Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.00655"},"observation_digest":"sha256:59d2918f0b0881f898da833a77e1c48e06f4ba0db277a1673c4a266918ea00e5","observation_id":"a40fa278-c33e-4df8-9aee-cac9a6e99e23","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T22:49:03.627962Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:54.927442+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T22:49:03.604463Z","title":"CompCert-a formally verified optimizing compiler // ERTS","venue":null,"work_id":"d00e6a48-7541-4d01-91ef-b3035556e621","year":2016},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.00655","last_updated":"2024-12-31T21:47:46Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T12:12:03.522663Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-31T21:47:46Z","title":"Finding Missed Code Size Optimizations in Compilers using LLMs","version":1},"reference_index":14,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T22:49:03.262588Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.00655"},"observation_digest":"sha256:7f17d1bac7096781fdc18cb1ceffa84698d4a984567cb4f88086dfc6d9656064","observation_id":"3b2aea3b-3ae8-4b18-a19b-63672f7dc824","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T22:49:03.610460Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:54.927442+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T22:49:03.582255Z","title":"Boosting Compiler Testing by Injecting Real-World Code // PLDI","venue":null,"work_id":"85d3af9e-2b08-4610-a908-c6f57197697e","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.00655","last_updated":"2024-12-31T21:47:46Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T12:12:03.522663Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-31T21:47:46Z","title":"Finding Missed Code Size Optimizations in Compilers using LLMs","version":1},"reference_index":15,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T22:49:03.268122Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.00655"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b0462b860f1942b07e7d481f8e24edff1cdb85fc505698364c19b71a84ff1531","observation_id":"5ec79c30-2bfb-4d92-965a-1258b9799b3e","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T22:49:03.589726Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:54.927442+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T22:49:03.565285Z","title":"Deepfuzz: Automatic generation of syntax valid c programs for fuzz testing // AAAI","venue":null,"work_id":"17b260c3-5bbe-4bee-b53e-f17cdeb49446","year":2019},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.00655","last_updated":"2024-12-31T21:47:46Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T12:12:03.522663Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-31T21:47:46Z","title":"Finding Missed Code Size Optimizations in Compilers using LLMs","version":1},"reference_index":16,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T22:49:03.273401Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.00655"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c06ab9b6f56fc1829d0ff92c1dab4e564de27eba6f1b226cc085994f4c364e2c","observation_id":"1bd94900-ba61-42b2-91c9-4a07d207a901","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T22:49:03.570561Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:54.927442+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T22:49:03.548391Z","title":"Exploring missed optimizations in webassembly optimizers // ISSTA","venue":null,"work_id":"2b464f3d-a2c1-4ba6-9701-7404e29bd4d7","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.00655","last_updated":"2024-12-31T21:47:46Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T12:12:03.522663Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-31T21:47:46Z","title":"Finding Missed Code Size Optimizations in Compilers using LLMs","version":1},"reference_index":17,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T22:49:03.278596Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.00655"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c3aaa08a520b0737754c590eef740066359c9649e38c763ec8314a5e7c4f5d84","observation_id":"b9502195-48ab-4c02-8e7a-7a3bb6182687","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T22:49:03.553872Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:54.927442+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T22:49:03.531206Z","title":"Random Testing for C and C++ Compilers with YARPGen // OOPSLA","venue":null,"work_id":"9dc3f18b-c31e-429f-a916-7265b6565cc3","year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.00655","last_updated":"2024-12-31T21:47:46Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T12:12:03.522663Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-31T21:47:46Z","title":"Finding Missed Code Size Optimizations in Compilers using LLMs","version":1},"reference_index":18,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T22:49:03.283348Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.00655"},"observation_digest":"sha256:917064c3307487bb61488ebe59731c559a2482c86ada13ded5486f4bf51331a0","observation_id":"a2a2fd57-808e-403a-b1be-c2283ced9d6f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T22:49:03.536621Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:54.927442+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T22:49:03.510647Z","title":"Differential Testing for Software // Digital Technical Journal","venue":null,"work_id":"6869b90f-739f-4ce7-9a24-df9ba421cb53","year":1998},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.00655","last_updated":"2024-12-31T21:47:46Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T12:12:03.522663Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-31T21:47:46Z","title":"Finding Missed Code Size Optimizations in Compilers using LLMs","version":1},"reference_index":19,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T22:49:03.288607Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.00655"},"observation_digest":"sha256:66d87b78b98933515f7308405285702df49f93dba130f95e9e39f8d1581790f4","observation_id":"b7549112-41fc-4844-b625-a0b462ee5379","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T22:49:03.517650Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:54.927442+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T22:49:03.491284Z","title":"Test-case reduction for C compiler bugs // PLDI","venue":null,"work_id":"a2e947bf-bccf-4cbc-9b61-b11ae6bc7d92","year":2012},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.00655","last_updated":"2024-12-31T21:47:46Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T12:12:03.522663Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-31T21:47:46Z","title":"Finding Missed Code Size Optimizations in Compilers using LLMs","version":1},"reference_index":20,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T22:49:03.293770Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.00655"},"observation_digest":"sha256:8dad39403cd6b6c16720b916d4af06aad248d7e6ce42b8a8852dda1ddda10af6","observation_id":"c33e90a0-0258-4c97-99fc-30b45701691f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T22:49:03.496412Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:54.927442+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T22:49:03.474493Z","title":"Compiler testing: a systematic literature analysis // Frontiers of Computer Science","venue":null,"work_id":"72bff850-bce2-4458-8298-0e494a46cd67","year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.00655","last_updated":"2024-12-31T21:47:46Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T12:12:03.522663Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-31T21:47:46Z","title":"Finding Missed Code Size Optimizations in Compilers using LLMs","version":1},"reference_index":21,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T22:49:03.302227Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.00655"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e94bf656d642b426f66c50f36c30bafb3fe1ed36c30d3eaf21d792199534ada4","observation_id":"97fee150-9ecd-431d-bf4b-fd6abee0741f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T22:49:03.479789Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:54.927442+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T22:49:03.456383Z","title":"Finding missed optimizations through the lens of dead code elimination // ASPLOS","venue":null,"work_id":"e1ddc361-4aaa-4eec-a6aa-b23b2546b4ca","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.00655","last_updated":"2024-12-31T21:47:46Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T12:12:03.522663Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-31T21:47:46Z","title":"Finding Missed Code Size Optimizations in Compilers using LLMs","version":1},"reference_index":22,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T22:49:03.307624Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.00655"},"observation_digest":"sha256:474b5ef7483b78c1a72f0ed747367e9c489a902a80e47f495da9da1971dda107","observation_id":"6a0589d4-052c-4866-8b42-1a84e0c79350","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T22:49:03.462850Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:54.927442+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T22:49:03.436301Z","title":"Fuzz4all: Universal fuzzing with large language models // ICSE","venue":null,"work_id":"c4db5e31-29e9-430f-b2e5-9d3aa3460faa","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.00655","last_updated":"2024-12-31T21:47:46Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T12:12:03.522663Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-31T21:47:46Z","title":"Finding Missed Code Size Optimizations in Compilers using LLMs","version":1},"reference_index":23,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T22:49:03.313096Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.00655"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e03dd54b86902cb2d166a7dbcaebf699d9f1eae5a4cab871350be94661321b45","observation_id":"328901d2-0238-46a0-aa29-c98e117765f0","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T22:49:03.442066Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:54.927442+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T22:49:03.414891Z","title":"Finding and Understanding Bugs in C Compilers // PLDI","venue":null,"work_id":"19d34451-9d7e-42e9-8695-caeac0631f75","year":2011},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.00655","last_updated":"2024-12-31T21:47:46Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T12:12:03.522663Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-31T21:47:46Z","title":"Finding Missed Code Size Optimizations in Compilers using LLMs","version":1},"reference_index":24,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T22:49:03.318606Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.00655"},"observation_digest":"sha256:de354340cabeb762b87d095dc5db95cdef281a1de31f58d8b8a9f951efb2614e","observation_id":"bf0b14cd-1b13-41fe-8299-4150bce588dd","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T22:49:03.421926Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:54.927442+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}}],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.00655","last_updated":"2024-12-31T21:47:46Z","latest_version":1,"primary_category":"cs.SE","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T12:12:03.522663Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-31T21:47:46Z","title":"Finding Missed Code Size Optimizations in Compilers using LLMs"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":24,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":4,"verified_exact":0,"verified_fuzzy":20},"total_outbound_references":24},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:54.927442+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 20 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 24 of 24 outbound references and 5 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2501.00655."}