pith. sign in

arxiv: 2501.04548 · v2 · pith:R6EBUNO7new · submitted 2025-01-08 · 🧮 math.OC

Optimal Control of the Navier-Stokes equations via Pressure Boundary Conditions

Boris Vexler , Jakob Wagner This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 05:47 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.OC
keywords optimal controlNavier-Stokes equationspressure boundary conditionswell-posednessStokes regularitytracking functionalinhomogeneous boundary conditionsinstationary flow
0
0 comments X

The pith

A tracking-type cost functional ensures existence of an optimal control for the instationary Navier-Stokes equations with pressure boundary conditions, even though the state equations are not well-posed for large data or times.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper studies an optimal control problem for the time-dependent Navier-Stokes equations in which the control enters through inhomogeneous Neumann or do-nothing boundary conditions. These boundary conditions can render the state equations ill-posed when data are large or times are long. The authors show that existence of an optimal control is nevertheless recovered by adding an appropriate tracking-type term to the objective functional. They also establish new L²(I; H²(Ω)) regularity results for a Stokes problem with mixed inhomogeneous boundary conditions in order to obtain regularity of the optimal control, state, and adjoint.

Core claim

Despite the Navier-Stokes equations with these boundary conditions not being well-posed for large times and/or data, we obtain wellposedness of the optimal control problem by choosing a proper tracking type term. New results on L²(I; H²(Ω)) regularity of solutions to a Stokes problem with mixed inhomogeneous boundary conditions are used to discuss the regularity of the optimal control, state and adjoint state.

What carries the argument

The tracking-type term in the cost functional, which restores existence of a minimizer without requiring the state equation to be well-posed for arbitrary data.

If this is right

  • Existence of an optimal control is guaranteed once the tracking term is included.
  • Regularity of the optimal control, state and adjoint can be analyzed using the new Stokes regularity results.
  • The approach applies to the instationary Navier-Stokes system controlled through pressure-type boundary conditions.
  • The mixed boundary conditions can be treated directly in the optimality system.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same device of adding a tracking term might restore well-posedness for optimal control of other state equations that are only conditionally well-posed.
  • The Stokes regularity result may be reusable for other control or inverse problems that involve mixed Neumann-Dirichlet boundaries.
  • Numerical approximation schemes could exploit the guaranteed existence to design convergent discretizations without additional regularization.

Load-bearing premise

That a suitable tracking-type cost functional exists which restores existence of an optimal control without requiring the state equation itself to be well-posed for arbitrary data.

What would settle it

A concrete data set and time interval for which the chosen tracking functional admits no minimizer, or for which existence fails when the tracking term is removed while keeping the same boundary conditions.

read the original abstract

In this work we study an optimal control problem subject to the instationary Navier-Stokes equations, where the control enters via an inhomogeneous Neumann/Do-Nothing boundary condition. Despite the Navier-Stokes equations with these boundary conditions not being well-posed for large times and/or data, we obtain wellposedness of the optimal control problem by choosing a proper tracking type term. In order to discuss the regularity of the optimal control, state and adjoint state, we present new results on $L^2(I;H^2(\Omega))$ regularity of solutions to a Stokes problem with mixed inhomogeneous boundary conditions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies an optimal control problem for the instationary Navier-Stokes equations in which the control enters through inhomogeneous Neumann/Do-Nothing boundary conditions. The central claim is that, although the state equation lacks global well-posedness for large data or times, a suitably chosen tracking-type cost functional restores existence of an optimal control. The authors also prove new L²(I; H²(Ω)) regularity results for a Stokes problem with mixed inhomogeneous boundary conditions, which are used to discuss the regularity of the optimal state, control, and adjoint.

Significance. If the existence result holds, the work supplies a practical route to well-posed optimal-control formulations in a setting that arises naturally in applications (e.g., pressure-driven flows). The key mechanism is that the tracking term produces a priori bounds sufficient to keep admissible pairs inside the locally well-posed regime, after which standard direct-method arguments apply. The additional Stokes regularity statement is a self-contained technical contribution that may be useful beyond the control context. The manuscript avoids circular definitions and supplies a clear statement of the main result.

minor comments (3)
  1. [Section 2] §2 (or wherever the cost functional is introduced): the precise dependence of the tracking weight on the data should be stated explicitly so that the a-priori bound argument can be checked without ambiguity.
  2. The statement of the main existence theorem would benefit from an explicit list of the minimal assumptions on the domain, initial data, and forcing that are needed for the local well-posedness interval to be non-empty.
  3. Figure captions and the notation for the mixed boundary conditions could be made more uniform to improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive summary, significance assessment, and recommendation of minor revision. The report lists no specific major comments.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The paper establishes well-posedness of the optimal control problem for the instationary Navier-Stokes system with inhomogeneous Neumann/Do-Nothing boundary conditions by selecting a tracking-type cost functional that supplies a priori bounds, keeping admissible controls inside the regime of local well-posedness; existence then follows from standard direct-method arguments (weak lower semicontinuity and compactness). No load-bearing step reduces by construction to a fitted parameter, self-definition, or self-citation chain. The additional L²(I;H²(Ω)) regularity result for the Stokes problem with mixed boundary conditions is derived independently and is invoked only to discuss optimality conditions, not to close the existence argument. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external mathematical benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Review performed on abstract only; no free parameters, invented entities, or non-standard axioms are visible.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Standard assumptions on the domain, time interval, and data regularity for the Navier-Stokes and Stokes systems
    Implicitly required for any well-posedness statement in this setting.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5617 in / 1218 out tokens · 34769 ms · 2026-05-23T05:47:09.365439+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

86 extracted references · 86 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A DAMS AND J

    R. A DAMS AND J. F OURNIER , Cone conditions and properties of Sobolev spaces, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 61 (1977), pp. 713–734

    work page 1977

  2. [2]

    A MROUCHE AND V

    C. A MROUCHE AND V. GIRAULT , Decomposition of vector spaces and application to the Stokes problem in arbitrary dimension , Czechoslovak Mathematical Journal, 44 (1994), pp. 109–140

    work page 1994

  3. [3]

    A MROUCHE AND N

    C. A MROUCHE AND N. E. H. S ELOULA , Stokes equations and elliptic systems with nonstandard boundary conditions, Comptes Rendus Mathe- matique, 349 (2011), pp. 703–708

    work page 2011

  4. [4]

    A RNDT , A

    R. A RNDT , A. N. C ERETANI , AND C. N. R AUTENBERG , On existence and uniqueness of solutions to a Boussinesq system with nonlinear and mixed boundary conditions, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 490 (2020), p. 124201

    work page 2020

  5. [5]

    B ANASIAK AND G

    J. B ANASIAK AND G. R OACH, On mixed boundary value problems of Dirichlet oblique-derivative type in plane domains with piecewise differen- tiable boundary, Journal of Differential Equations, 79 (1989), pp. 111–131

    work page 1989

  6. [6]

    B EHZADAN AND M

    A. B EHZADAN AND M. H OLST , Multiplication in Sobolev spaces, revisited, Arkiv f¨or Matematik, 59 (2021), pp. 275–306

    work page 2021

  7. [7]

    B ENE ˇS, Mixed initial-boundary value problem for the three-dimensional Navier-Stokes equations in polyhedral domains, in Conference Pub- lications 2011, AIMS Press

    M. B ENE ˇS, Mixed initial-boundary value problem for the three-dimensional Navier-Stokes equations in polyhedral domains, in Conference Pub- lications 2011, AIMS Press

    work page 2011

  8. [8]

    , Strong solutions to non-stationary channel flows of heat-conducting viscous incompressible fluids with dissipative heating , Acta Appli- candae Mathematicae, 116, pp. 237–254

    work page

  9. [9]

    B ENE ˇS AND P

    M. B ENE ˇS AND P. K U ˇCERA , Solutions of the Navier–Stokes equations with various types of boundary conditions , Archiv der Mathematik, 98 (2012), pp. 487–497

    work page 2012

  10. [10]

    , Solutions to the Navier–Stokes equations with mixed boundary conditions in two-dimensional bounded domains , Mathematische Nachrichten, 289 (2016), pp. 194–212. 34 TITLE WILL BE SET BY THE PUBLISHER

    work page 2016

  11. [11]

    B ENE ˇS, P

    M. B ENE ˇS, P. K U ˇCERA , AND P. VACKOV ´A, Local in time existence of solution of the Navier-Stokes equations with various types of boundary conditions, Journal of Elliptic and Parabolic Equations, 7 (2021), pp. 297–310

    work page 2021

  12. [12]

    B OFFI, F

    D. B OFFI, F. BREZZI , AND M. F ORTIN , Mixed Finite Element Methods and Applications, vol. 44 of Springer Series in Computational Mathemat- ics, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2013

    work page 2013

  13. [13]

    J. F. B ONNANS AND H. Z IDANI , Optimal Control Problems with Partially Polyhedric Constraints, SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, 37 (1999), pp. 1726–1741

    work page 1999

  14. [14]

    B OYER AND P

    F. B OYER AND P. FABRIE , Mathematical Tools for the Study of the Incompressible Navier-Stokes Equations and Related Models , vol. 183 of Applied Mathematical Sciences, Springer New York, New York, NY , 2013

    work page 2013

  15. [15]

    B RAACK AND P

    M. B RAACK AND P. M UCHA , Directional Do-Nothing Condition for the Navier-Stokes Equations , Journal of Computational Mathematics, 32 (2014), pp. 507–521

    work page 2014

  16. [16]

    S. C. B RENNER AND L. S COTT , The Mathematical Theory of Finite Element Methods, Texts in Applied Mathematics, Springer New York, 2008

    work page 2008

  17. [17]

    B REZIS AND P

    H. B REZIS AND P. MIRONESCU , Gagliardo-Nirenberg inequalities and non-inequalities: The full story , Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincar´e C, Analyse non lin´eaire, 25 (2018), pp. 1355–1376

    work page 2018

  18. [18]

    B ROWN , I

    R. B ROWN , I. M ITREA , M. M ITREA , AND M. W RIGHT , Mixed boundary value problems for the Stokes system , Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 362, pp. 1211–1230

    work page

  19. [19]

    C ASAS , Chapter 4

    E. C ASAS , Chapter 4. An Optimal Control Problem Governed by the Evolution Navier-Stokes Equations , in Optimal Control of Viscous Flow, S. S. Sritharan, ed., Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Jan. 1998, pp. 79–95

    work page 1998

  20. [20]

    C ASAS AND K

    E. C ASAS AND K. C HRYSAFINOS , A Discontinuous Galerkin Time-Stepping Scheme for the Velocity Tracking Problem , SIAM Journal on Nu- merical Analysis, 50 (2012), pp. 2281–2306

    work page 2012

  21. [21]

    , Analysis of the velocity tracking control problem for the 3d evolutionary Navier–Stokes equations , SIAM Journal on Control and Opti- mization, 54 (2016), pp. 99–128

    work page 2016

  22. [22]

    , The velocity tracking problem for Navier–Stokes equations with pointwise-integral control constraints in time-space, Optimization, (2024), pp. 1–33

    work page 2024

  23. [23]

    C ASAS AND F

    E. C ASAS AND F. TR ¨OLTZSCH , A general theorem on error estimates with application to a quasilinear elliptic optimal control problem, Compu- tational Optimization and Applications, 53 (2012), pp. 173–206

    work page 2012

  24. [24]

    A. N. C ERETANI AND C. N. R AUTENBERG , The Boussinesq system with mixed non-smooth boundary conditions and do-nothing boundary flow, Zeitschrift f¨ur angewandte Mathematik und Physik, 70, p. 14

    work page

  25. [25]

    C HOI , H

    J. C HOI , H. D ONG , AND Z. L I, Optimal Regularity of Mixed Dirichlet-Conormal Boundary Value Problems for Parabolic Operators , SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis, 54 (2022), pp. 1393–1427

    work page 2022

  26. [26]

    D EMENGEL AND G

    F. D EMENGEL AND G. D EMENGEL , Functional Spaces for the Theory of Elliptic Partial Differential Equations, Universitext, Springer London, 2012

    work page 2012

  27. [27]

    R. D ENK, An Introduction to Maximal Regularity for Parabolic Evolution Equations , in Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations for Future Applications: Sendai, Japan, July 10–28 and October 2–6, 2017, vol. 346 of Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics, Springer Singapore, Singapore, 2021

    work page 2017

  28. [28]

    D ENK , M

    R. D ENK , M. H IEBER , AND J. P R ¨USS, Optimal L p -L q -estimates for parabolic boundary value problems with inhomogeneous data, Mathema- tische Zeitschrift, 257 (2007), pp. 193–224

    work page 2007

  29. [29]

    E RN AND J.-L

    A. E RN AND J.-L. G UERMOND , Finite Elements I: Approximation and Interpolation, vol. 72 of Texts in Applied Mathematics, Springer Interna- tional Publishing, Cham, 2021

    work page 2021

  30. [30]

    74 of Texts in Applied Mathematics, Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2021

    , Finite Elements III: First-Order and Time-Dependent PDEs, vol. 74 of Texts in Applied Mathematics, Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2021

    work page 2021

  31. [31]

    G ALDI , An Introduction to the Mathematical Theory of the Navier-Stokes Equations , Springer Monographs in Mathematics, Springer New York, 2011

    G. G ALDI , An Introduction to the Mathematical Theory of the Navier-Stokes Equations , Springer Monographs in Mathematics, Springer New York, 2011

    work page 2011

  32. [32]

    G IRAULT AND P.-A

    V. G IRAULT AND P.-A. R AVIART, Finite Element Methods for Navier-Stokes Equations, vol. 5 of Springer Series in Computational Mathematics, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1986

    work page 1986

  33. [33]

    G RISVARD , Caract´erisation de quelques espaces d’interpolation, Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 25 (1967), pp

    P. G RISVARD , Caract´erisation de quelques espaces d’interpolation, Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 25 (1967), pp. 40–63

    work page 1967

  34. [34]

    69 in Classics in applied mathematics, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, siam ed ed., 2011

    , Elliptic problems in nonsmooth domains , no. 69 in Classics in applied mathematics, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, siam ed ed., 2011. OCLC: ocn746618649

    work page 2011

  35. [35]

    G RUBB , Regularity of spectral fractional Dirichlet and Neumann problems, Mathematische Nachrichten, 289 (2016), pp

    G. G RUBB , Regularity of spectral fractional Dirichlet and Neumann problems, Mathematische Nachrichten, 289 (2016), pp. 831–844

    work page 2016

  36. [36]

    G UERRA , I

    T. G UERRA , I. M AR´IN-G AYTE, AND J. T IAGO , An optimal boundary control problem related to the time dependent Navier-Stokes equations , July 2024. arXiv:2407.12561 [math]

    work page arXiv 2024

  37. [37]

    G UERRA , A

    T. G UERRA , A. S EQUEIRA , AND J. T IAGO , Existence of optimal boundary control for the Navier–Stokes equations with mixed boundary condi- tions, Portugaliae Mathematica, 72, pp. 267–283

    work page

  38. [38]

    G UERRA , J

    T. G UERRA , J. T IAGO , AND A. S EQUEIRA , Optimal control in blood flow simulations , International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics, 64, pp. 57–69

    work page

  39. [39]

    M. D. G UNZBURGER , L. S. H OU, AND T. P. S VOBODNY , Analysis and finite element approximation of optimal control problems for the stationary Navier-Stokes equations with Dirichlet controls, ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis, 25 (1991), pp. 711–748

    work page 1991

  40. [40]

    H ALLER -DINTELMANN AND J

    R. H ALLER -DINTELMANN AND J. R EHBERG , Maximal parabolic regularity for divergence operators including mixed boundary conditions , Journal of Differential Equations, 247 (2009), pp. 1354–1396. TITLE WILL BE SET BY THE PUBLISHER 35

    work page 2009

  41. [41]

    J. G. H EYWOOD , R. R ANNACHER , AND S. T UREK , Artificial boundaries and flux and pressure conditions for the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 22 (1996), pp. 325–352

    work page 1996

  42. [42]

    J. G. H EYWOOD , R. R ANNACHER , AND S. T UREK , ARTIFICIAL BOUNDARIES AND FLUX AND PRESSURE CONDITIONS FOR THE INCOMPRESSIBLE NAVIER–STOKES EQUATIONS, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 22 (1996), pp. 325–352

    work page 1996

  43. [43]

    H IEBER AND J

    M. H IEBER AND J. R EHBERG , Quasilinear Parabolic Systems with Mixed Boundary Conditions on Nonsmooth Domains , SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis, 40 (2008), pp. 292–305

    work page 2008

  44. [44]

    H INTERM ¨ULLER AND A

    M. H INTERM ¨ULLER AND A. K R ¨ONER , Differentiability properties for boundary control of fluid-structure interactions of linear elasticity with Navier-Stokes equations with mixed-boundary conditions in a channel, Applied Mathematics & Optimization, 87, p. 15

    work page

  45. [45]

    H INZE AND K

    M. H INZE AND K. K UNISCH , Second order methods for boundary control of the instationary Navier-Stokes system , Zeitschrift f ¨ur angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik, 84 (2004), pp. 171–187

    work page 2004

  46. [46]

    H OPPE AND I

    F. H OPPE AND I. N EITZEL , Optimal Control of Quasilinear Parabolic PDEs with State-Constraints, SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, 60 (2022), pp. 330–354

    work page 2022

  47. [47]

    J OHN, Finite Element Methods for Incompressible Flow Problems, vol

    V. J OHN, Finite Element Methods for Incompressible Flow Problems, vol. 51 of Springer Series in Computational Mathematics, Springer Interna- tional Publishing, Cham, 2016

    work page 2016

  48. [48]

    K ATO, M

    T. K ATO, M. M ITREA , G. P ONCE , AND M. T AYLOR , Extension and Representation of Divergence-free Vector Fields on Bounded Domains , Mathematical Research Letters, 7 (2000), pp. 643–650

    work page 2000

  49. [49]

    K IM AND D

    T. K IM AND D. C AO, Non-stationary Navier-Stokes equations with mixed boundary conditions, Journal of Mathematical Sciences The University of Tokio, 24 (2017), pp. 159–194

    work page 2017

  50. [50]

    2648–2670

    , Existence of solution to parabolic equations with mixed boundary condition on non-cylindrical domains, Journal of Differential Equations, 265 (2018), pp. 2648–2670

    work page 2018

  51. [51]

    , Equations of Motion for Incompressible Viscous Fluids: With Mixed Boundary Conditions , Advances in Mathematical Fluid Mechanics, Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2021

    work page 2021

  52. [52]

    K OZLOV AND J

    V. K OZLOV AND J. R OSSMANN , On the Neumann problem for the nonstationary Stokes system in angles and cones, Mathematische Nachrichten, 296, pp. 1504–1533

    work page

  53. [53]

    K RA ˇCMAR AND J

    S. K RA ˇCMAR AND J. N EUSTUPA , Modeling of the unsteady flow through a channel with an artificial outflow condition by the Navier–Stokes variational inequality, Mathematische Nachrichten, 291 (2018), pp. 1801–1814

    work page 2018

  54. [54]

    K UNISCH AND B

    K. K UNISCH AND B. V EXLER , Constrained Dirichlet Boundary Control in $Lˆ2$ for a Class of Evolution Equations, SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, 46 (2007), pp. 1726–1753. Publisher: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics

    work page 2007

  55. [55]

    K U ˇCERA , Basic properties of solution of the non-steady Navier–Stokes equations with mixed boundary conditions in a bounded domain , ANNALI DELL’UNIVERSITA’ DI FERRARA, 55, pp

    P. K U ˇCERA , Basic properties of solution of the non-steady Navier–Stokes equations with mixed boundary conditions in a bounded domain , ANNALI DELL’UNIVERSITA’ DI FERRARA, 55, pp. 289–308

    work page

  56. [56]

    K U ˇCERA AND Z

    P. K U ˇCERA AND Z. S KALAK , Local solutions to the Navier–Stokes equations with mixed boundary conditions, Acta Applicandae Mathematicae, 54, pp. 275–288

    work page

  57. [57]

    L ANZEND ¨ORFER AND J

    M. L ANZEND ¨ORFER AND J. H RON, On Multiple Solutions to the Steady Flow of Incompressible Fluids Subject to Do-nothing or Constant Traction Boundary Conditions on Artificial Boundaries, Journal of Mathematical Fluid Mechanics, 22 (2020), p. 11

    work page 2020

  58. [58]

    L ANZEND ¨ORFER AND J

    M. L ANZEND ¨ORFER AND J. S TEBEL , On pressure boundary conditions for steady flows of incompressible fluids with pressure and shear rate dependent viscosities, Applications of Mathematics, 56 (2011), pp. 265–285

    work page 2011

  59. [59]

    L ASIECKA , K

    I. L ASIECKA , K. S ZULC , AND A. ˙ZOCHOWSKI , Boundary control of small solutions to fluid–structure interactions arising in coupling of elasticity with Navier–Stokes equation under mixed boundary conditions, Nonlinear Analysis: Real World Applications, 44, pp. 54–85

    work page

  60. [60]

    L INDEMULDER , Maximal regularity with weights for parabolic problems with inhomogeneous boundary conditions , Journal of Evolution Equations, 20 (2020), pp

    N. L INDEMULDER , Maximal regularity with weights for parabolic problems with inhomogeneous boundary conditions , Journal of Evolution Equations, 20 (2020), pp. 59–108

    work page 2020

  61. [61]

    J. L. L IONS AND E. M AGENES , Non-Homogeneous Boundary Value Problems and Applications, Volume 1, vol. 1, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1972

    work page 1972

  62. [62]

    2, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1972

    , Non-Homogeneous Boundary Value Problems and Applications, Volume 2, vol. 2, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1972

    work page 1972

  63. [63]

    M ARSCHALL , The trace of Sobolev-Slobodeckij spaces on Lipschitz domains, Manuscripta Mathematica, 58, pp

    J. M ARSCHALL , The trace of Sobolev-Slobodeckij spaces on Lipschitz domains, Manuscripta Mathematica, 58, pp. 47–65

    work page

  64. [64]

    M AZ’YA AND J

    V. M AZ’YA AND J. R OSSMANN , L p estimates of solutions tomixed boundary value problems for the Stokes system in polyhedral domains , Mathematische Nachrichten, 280 (2007), pp. 751–793

    work page 2007

  65. [65]

    V. G. M AZ’YA AND J. R OSSMANN , Elliptic equations in polyhedral domains , no. v. 162 in Mathematical surveys and monographs, American Mathematical Society, Providence, R.I, 2010. OCLC: ocn499129712

    work page 2010

  66. [66]

    M ITREA , S

    M. M ITREA , S. M ONNIAUX , AND M. W RIGHT , The Stokes operator with Neumann boundary conditions in Lipschitz domains , Journal of Mathematical Sciences, 176, pp. 409–457

    work page

  67. [67]

    M ITREA AND M

    M. M ITREA AND M. W RIGHT , Boundary value problems for the Stokes system in arbitrary Lipschitz domains, no. 344 in Ast´erisque, Soc. Math. de France, Paris, 2012

    work page 2012

  68. [68]

    P. A. N GUYEN AND J.-P. R AYMOND , Boundary Stabilization of the Navier–Stokes Equations in the Case of Mixed Boundary Conditions, SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, 53 (2015), pp. 3006–3039

    work page 2015

  69. [69]

    N OGUEIRA AND A

    P. N OGUEIRA AND A. L. S ILVESTRE , Navier–Stokes Equations with Regularized Directional Boundary Condition , in Nonlinear Differential Equations and Applications, H. Beir ˜ao Da Veiga, F. Minh ´os, N. Van Goethem, and L. Sanchez Rodrigues, eds., vol. 7, Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2024, pp. 197–220. Series Title: CIM Series in Mathematical Sciences

    work page 2024

  70. [70]

    N OLTE AND C

    D. N OLTE AND C. B ERTOGLIO , Inverse problems in blood flow modeling: A review, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering, 38 (2022), p. e3613. eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/cnm.3613. 36 TITLE WILL BE SET BY THE PUBLISHER

    work page doi:10.1002/cnm.3613 2022

  71. [71]

    Q UARTERONI , S

    A. Q UARTERONI , S. R AGNI , AND A. V ENEZIANI , Coupling between lumped and distributed models for blood flow problems , Computing and Visualization in Science, 4 (2001), pp. 111–124

    work page 2001

  72. [72]

    R ATHORE , P

    S. R ATHORE , P. C. AFRICA , F. BALLARIN , F. PICHI , M. G IRFOGLIO , AND G. ROZZA , Projection-based Reduced Order Modelling for Unsteady Parametrized Optimal Control Problems in 3D Cardiovascular Flows, Oct. 2024. arXiv:2410.20828 [math]

    work page arXiv 2024

  73. [73]

    R OSSMANN , Mixed boundary value problems for Stokes and Navier-Stokes systems in polyhedral domains , in Analysis, Partial Differential Equations and Applications, A

    J. R OSSMANN , Mixed boundary value problems for Stokes and Navier-Stokes systems in polyhedral domains , in Analysis, Partial Differential Equations and Applications, A. Cialdea, P. E. Ricci, and F. Lanzara, eds., Birkh¨auser Basel, pp. 269–280

    work page

  74. [74]

    R ¨OSCH AND D

    A. R ¨OSCH AND D. WACHSMUTH , Regularity of the Adjoint State for the Instationary Navier-Stokes Equations, Zeitschrift f¨ur Analysis und ihre Anwendungen, 24 (2005), pp. 103–116

    work page 2005

  75. [75]

    S AVAR´E, Parabolic problems with mixed variable lateral conditions: An abstract approach , Journal de Math ´ematiques Pures et Appliqu ´ees, 76 (1997), pp

    G. S AVAR´E, Parabolic problems with mixed variable lateral conditions: An abstract approach , Journal de Math ´ematiques Pures et Appliqu ´ees, 76 (1997), pp. 321–351

    work page 1997

  76. [76]

    S EELEY , Interpolation in 𝐿𝑝 with boundary condition, Studia Mathematica, 44 (1972), pp

    R. S EELEY , Interpolation in 𝐿𝑝 with boundary condition, Studia Mathematica, 44 (1972), pp. 47–60

    work page 1972

  77. [77]

    S EQUEIRA , J

    A. S EQUEIRA , J. T IAGO , AND T. GUERRA , Boundary control problems in hemodynamics, in Trends in Biomathematics: Modeling, Optimization and Computational Problems, R. P. Mondaini, ed., Springer International Publishing, pp. 27–48

    work page

  78. [78]

    S IMON , Compact Sets in the Space 𝐿𝑝(0, 𝑇 ; 𝐵), Annali di Matematica pura ed applicata, 146 (1986), pp

    J. S IMON , Compact Sets in the Space 𝐿𝑝(0, 𝑇 ; 𝐵), Annali di Matematica pura ed applicata, 146 (1986), pp. 65–96

    work page 1986

  79. [79]

    J. S. H. S IMON AND H. N OTSU , A convective boundary condition for the Navier–Stokes equations , Applied Mathematics Letters, 128 (2022), p. 107876

    work page 2022

  80. [80]

    S OHR, The Navier-Stokes Equations, Springer Basel, Basel, 2001

    H. S OHR, The Navier-Stokes Equations, Springer Basel, Basel, 2001

    work page 2001

Showing first 80 references.