{"as_of":"2026-08-14T06:23:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:00597e489f67f524cabb26c5866d1e9ff4dcea19e4a26af47013674beaa516ec","coverage":[{"denominator":39,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":39,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.143016Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":39,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":39,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":0,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"cited_works","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2501.15485/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2501.15485/integrity","json":"/paper/2501.15485/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2501.15485"},"outbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.684627Z","title":"A morphing-based 3D point cloud reconstruction framework for medical image processing,","venue":null,"work_id":"dfc9751a-6086-4eda-8b57-cd411ddc7d7f","year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.15485","last_updated":"2025-01-26T11:09:16Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T08:09:49.066155Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-26T11:09:16Z","title":"Differentiable Low-computation Global Correlation Loss for Monotonicity Evaluation in Quality Assessment","version":1},"reference_index":2,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:06.984198Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.15485"},"observation_digest":"sha256:4f129a1de991451229261e1d2cfe73c44fec8748fc1205c3f2118c4d4f3d1379","observation_id":"a4516af3-0ce5-45f8-beac-9a4e2c74675d","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.688842Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.671258Z","title":"Point cloud generation using deep local features for augmented and mixed reality contents,","venue":null,"work_id":"15dbe9c3-f17c-4715-b1a0-159cbf4d5337","year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.15485","last_updated":"2025-01-26T11:09:16Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T08:09:49.066155Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-26T11:09:16Z","title":"Differentiable Low-computation Global Correlation Loss for Monotonicity Evaluation in Quality Assessment","version":1},"reference_index":3,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:06.988176Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.15485"},"observation_digest":"sha256:89a83de77afd379468cb6faffaace956fd9ef4c5e2ce029cbf26b4d021157786","observation_id":"5cc9c9da-a1a1-44fc-ab6f-8415595b26b7","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.675597Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.697406Z","title":"3D point cloud processing and learning for autonomous driving: Impacting map creation, localization, and perception,","venue":null,"work_id":"f060f033-a1bc-4ca9-9da9-cab60fee9a68","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.15485","last_updated":"2025-01-26T11:09:16Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T08:09:49.066155Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-26T11:09:16Z","title":"Differentiable Low-computation Global Correlation Loss for Monotonicity Evaluation in Quality Assessment","version":1},"reference_index":4,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:06.992231Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.15485"},"observation_digest":"sha256:acea467f849ec8805a7c0492a9e6da0fab5a960154e0e874e96a6dce53a84e57","observation_id":"9476f399-9a2d-4989-a6e7-8888f56d4d52","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.701705Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.658177Z","title":"3d is here: Point cloud library (PCL),","venue":null,"work_id":"ad276cf0-ee5a-480c-9d97-54519ad0d09e","year":2011},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.15485","last_updated":"2025-01-26T11:09:16Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T08:09:49.066155Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-26T11:09:16Z","title":"Differentiable Low-computation Global Correlation Loss for Monotonicity Evaluation in Quality Assessment","version":1},"reference_index":5,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:06.996007Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.15485"},"observation_digest":"sha256:53bb05030c9ee98d3abaf73f235650fd37c1ed1c5a283f7fba5ee5aecbc6283a","observation_id":"4fe4ec4b-16ed-47c8-a734-d1b7fd984792","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.662406Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.644684Z","title":"Comparison of four subjective methods for image quality assessment,","venue":null,"work_id":"398751c7-7127-48e2-8f78-a7ac9730d393","year":2012},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.15485","last_updated":"2025-01-26T11:09:16Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T08:09:49.066155Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-26T11:09:16Z","title":"Differentiable Low-computation Global Correlation Loss for Monotonicity Evaluation in Quality Assessment","version":1},"reference_index":6,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:06.999869Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.15485"},"observation_digest":"sha256:0ce0eb600e58bc9d8f633c4916842c75a37bcff4c2f43fb7f79815245af03ea6","observation_id":"c60e8841-df27-46a8-a88e-75627825ca96","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.649147Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.631348Z","title":"A survey of DNN methods for blind image quality assessment,","venue":null,"work_id":"46d38ffd-886c-48cb-aad1-b65cb8f34219","year":2019},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.15485","last_updated":"2025-01-26T11:09:16Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T08:09:49.066155Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-26T11:09:16Z","title":"Differentiable Low-computation Global Correlation Loss for Monotonicity Evaluation in Quality Assessment","version":1},"reference_index":7,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.004229Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.15485"},"observation_digest":"sha256:d719bc0344fa15ae1f09a81da78c7c5a8fa6393c51789a6271906328fc79c981","observation_id":"a0808571-2cbd-4b63-abdb-57e34d1b940d","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.635608Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.617012Z","title":"Point cloud quality assessment: Dataset construction and learning-based no-reference metric,","venue":null,"work_id":"77aa84d7-f21e-4db7-a982-1205a4834ce9","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.15485","last_updated":"2025-01-26T11:09:16Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T08:09:49.066155Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-26T11:09:16Z","title":"Differentiable Low-computation Global Correlation Loss for Monotonicity Evaluation in Quality Assessment","version":1},"reference_index":8,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.007881Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.15485"},"observation_digest":"sha256:12343b4dc1cdbc59c0bb0cf490e31922a47301daf56b79fbba75d55693af6e02","observation_id":"5d471f15-352f-4133-9a69-6e85572807c3","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.621791Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.601776Z","title":"Reduced reference quality assessment for point cloud compression,","venue":null,"work_id":"ae8c87ca-5b51-495a-b6f4-f2f9aaba0fe9","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.15485","last_updated":"2025-01-26T11:09:16Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T08:09:49.066155Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-26T11:09:16Z","title":"Differentiable Low-computation Global Correlation Loss for Monotonicity Evaluation in Quality Assessment","version":1},"reference_index":9,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.011896Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.15485"},"observation_digest":"sha256:8b9c28045d4c49baa086a9161ad8c170e269547edbc66723c369ddc47d052bfb","observation_id":"ef87a365-4efe-4f1d-ba20-bfdf732c971c","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.606872Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2401.10511","last_updated":"2024-01-19T06:03:01Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T04:39:23.344401Z","submitted_at":"2024-01-19T06:03:01Z","title":"GMC-IQA: Exploiting Global-correlation and Mean-opinion Consistency for No-reference Image Quality Assessment","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2401.10511","doi":null,"metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"2401.10511","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.247096Z","title":"GMC-IQA: Exploiting Global-correlation and Mean-opinion Consistency for No-reference Image Quality Assessment","venue":"cs.CV","work_id":"c5aa8139-089d-4501-8de5-6fc26e82146c","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.15485","last_updated":"2025-01-26T11:09:16Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T08:09:49.066155Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-26T11:09:16Z","title":"Differentiable Low-computation Global Correlation Loss for Monotonicity Evaluation in Quality Assessment","version":1},"reference_index":10,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.015886Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2401.10511","citing_paper":"/paper/2501.15485"},"observation_digest":"sha256:8b3c91b775b235a8e1991b33165bbb9fdd94be12efdcfaf825bff87695351d0e","observation_id":"ba2e5879-6898-48c9-8bde-b6350d8fa00f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.251654Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.588266Z","title":"MM-PCQA: Multi-modal learning for no-reference point cloud quality assessment,","venue":null,"work_id":"b0d9b9be-7eca-4ae4-b6c5-1b04e98c2eaf","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.15485","last_updated":"2025-01-26T11:09:16Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T08:09:49.066155Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-26T11:09:16Z","title":"Differentiable Low-computation Global Correlation Loss for Monotonicity Evaluation in Quality Assessment","version":1},"reference_index":11,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.020417Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.15485"},"observation_digest":"sha256:ce20074c56d05ab6b44d987ad355073c8f6155bcaf6983f28422f4b814b34d3f","observation_id":"a7643c67-705c-4664-9218-b1c02695c08b","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.592528Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.574702Z","title":"A deep learning based no- reference quality assessment model for ugc videos,","venue":null,"work_id":"2ce70962-cce3-4c4f-827e-d58bbb00c848","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.15485","last_updated":"2025-01-26T11:09:16Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T08:09:49.066155Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-26T11:09:16Z","title":"Differentiable Low-computation Global Correlation Loss for Monotonicity Evaluation in Quality Assessment","version":1},"reference_index":12,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.024452Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.15485"},"observation_digest":"sha256:019aacc48195f8cc9cc6b45de2deab671a485e59d8f7ab4480f5a78b83ace45c","observation_id":"aa85fbea-268d-4596-a2a5-01cfe33d199f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.579191Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.560708Z","title":"Novel no-reference image quality assessment metric based on joint relative features,","venue":null,"work_id":"93deb980-3c58-4e0f-970c-6fa5dc596455","year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.15485","last_updated":"2025-01-26T11:09:16Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T08:09:49.066155Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-26T11:09:16Z","title":"Differentiable Low-computation Global Correlation Loss for Monotonicity Evaluation in Quality Assessment","version":1},"reference_index":13,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.028979Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.15485"},"observation_digest":"sha256:ccc1457387c3e1ae328d2a20f531a8e8724508f48f8cef08187d525b9c0bf53b","observation_id":"293368e8-c6e2-4d16-8f4a-b4e47a9ff452","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.565239Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.547266Z","title":"RankIQA: Learning from rankings for no-reference image quality assessment,","venue":null,"work_id":"9920feae-a01c-45e8-b8cd-5c13f78d849b","year":2017},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.15485","last_updated":"2025-01-26T11:09:16Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T08:09:49.066155Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-26T11:09:16Z","title":"Differentiable Low-computation Global Correlation Loss for Monotonicity Evaluation in Quality Assessment","version":1},"reference_index":14,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.033412Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.15485"},"observation_digest":"sha256:056d7a54a5f8304098be98dec06e40af862eff6404c24610aa0357ee03706b81","observation_id":"2419e0e1-d6aa-4807-8959-72fac43e6513","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.551636Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2307.01567","last_updated":"2025-01-26T09:59:19Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T11:03:10.763494Z","submitted_at":"2023-07-04T08:42:58Z","title":"Once-Training-All-Fine: No-Reference Point Cloud Quality Assessment via Domain-relevance Degradation Description","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2307.01567","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.037834Z","title":"Once-Training-All-Fine: No-reference point cloud quality assessment via domain-relevance degradation de- scription,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.15485","last_updated":"2025-01-26T11:09:16Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T08:09:49.066155Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-26T11:09:16Z","title":"Differentiable Low-computation Global Correlation Loss for Monotonicity Evaluation in Quality Assessment","version":1},"reference_index":15,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.037834Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2307.01567","citing_paper":"/paper/2501.15485"},"observation_digest":"sha256:6f7af7dbe4f9841b5da5a6369819bad6514e6f72f3d63562e4403ecd78fb3bd8","observation_id":"7114520a-c323-4060-8e15-ba5f7f3938c3","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.037834Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2404.13277","last_updated":"2024-04-24T11:06:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T00:25:41.096369Z","submitted_at":"2024-04-20T05:24:06Z","title":"Beyond Score Changes: Adversarial Attack on No-Reference Image Quality Assessment from Two Perspectives","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2404.13277","doi":null,"metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"2404.13277","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.214418Z","title":"Beyond Score Changes: Adversarial Attack on No-Reference Image Quality Assessment from Two Perspectives","venue":"eess.IV","work_id":"651725c8-b2f6-43f5-be51-ef4cef9187f5","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.15485","last_updated":"2025-01-26T11:09:16Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T08:09:49.066155Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-26T11:09:16Z","title":"Differentiable Low-computation Global Correlation Loss for Monotonicity Evaluation in Quality Assessment","version":1},"reference_index":16,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.042787Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2404.13277","citing_paper":"/paper/2501.15485"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f72dc6415deaa49892eb24a2447b2a8387294baa31fd117d1a3b383ce3c70638","observation_id":"83204749-88c9-457d-bea9-da9856705bf6","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.219014Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.047435Z","title":"No-reference image quality assessment in the spatial domain,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2012},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.15485","last_updated":"2025-01-26T11:09:16Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T08:09:49.066155Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-26T11:09:16Z","title":"Differentiable Low-computation Global Correlation Loss for Monotonicity Evaluation in Quality Assessment","version":1},"reference_index":17,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.047435Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.15485"},"observation_digest":"sha256:82a7455f78817ca10423683cf432beed55a9cec47c5295ba064d035e64bee727","observation_id":"6bd40d05-03cd-458a-9f53-1fdc5b85d6b6","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.047435Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.051379Z","title":"A feature-enriched completely blind image quality evaluator,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2015},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.15485","last_updated":"2025-01-26T11:09:16Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T08:09:49.066155Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-26T11:09:16Z","title":"Differentiable Low-computation Global Correlation Loss for Monotonicity Evaluation in Quality Assessment","version":1},"reference_index":18,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.051379Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.15485"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b8be32a14ed8f088b35d1e1ac6569108b8653a77861bfe58cc2c9a80b93ddf82","observation_id":"fcb81fdd-9d2b-41e5-9fbb-b1f66b7f866f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.051379Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.515834Z","title":"Blind image quality assessment based on high order statistics aggregation,","venue":null,"work_id":"6a54c6d0-1629-47c2-8303-bcdbbd3c15f9","year":2016},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.15485","last_updated":"2025-01-26T11:09:16Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T08:09:49.066155Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-26T11:09:16Z","title":"Differentiable Low-computation Global Correlation Loss for Monotonicity Evaluation in Quality Assessment","version":1},"reference_index":19,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.055349Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.15485"},"observation_digest":"sha256:d8574856c982df0496b403beb5e37c98bb0e02e00d5c5c5b6dcda6af5bebd3c6","observation_id":"805be010-2db8-4d82-859b-5b04021c8a86","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.520733Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.501556Z","title":"Fully deep blind image quality predictor,","venue":null,"work_id":"b479692b-46db-440e-9eb0-f1168f8c84f7","year":2017},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.15485","last_updated":"2025-01-26T11:09:16Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T08:09:49.066155Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-26T11:09:16Z","title":"Differentiable Low-computation Global Correlation Loss for Monotonicity Evaluation in Quality Assessment","version":1},"reference_index":20,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.059409Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.15485"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a3a96a8e546e23f478b72f551bc283d8f0db19318a620b9a94f943c5414a627e","observation_id":"e2cbd90f-841b-4e8a-9c92-115d8eb1e0e8","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.506694Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.487934Z","title":"Blind image quality assessment using a deep bilinear convolutional neural network,","venue":null,"work_id":"85ff590e-4152-4b22-96b7-ea6c860305de","year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.15485","last_updated":"2025-01-26T11:09:16Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T08:09:49.066155Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-26T11:09:16Z","title":"Differentiable Low-computation Global Correlation Loss for Monotonicity Evaluation in Quality Assessment","version":1},"reference_index":21,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.063700Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.15485"},"observation_digest":"sha256:47fa1c4d0c82a14e718049463ffe57aacfd4e4cb088565f92a87d5a5bc992901","observation_id":"2927940f-8184-4044-af72-3377515a6a9f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.492882Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.475451Z","title":"Which has better visual quality: The clear blue sky or a blurry animal?","venue":null,"work_id":"c7bffd99-5268-4a79-891d-dd9e820775e9","year":2019},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.15485","last_updated":"2025-01-26T11:09:16Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T08:09:49.066155Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-26T11:09:16Z","title":"Differentiable Low-computation Global Correlation Loss for Monotonicity Evaluation in Quality Assessment","version":1},"reference_index":22,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.068144Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.15485"},"observation_digest":"sha256:1ea7d8ca0f11665244b91e5daefc98acfddef6362889c0dfeb4a07339c23f8e3","observation_id":"e60ee2fd-131b-462f-8209-5d3682c84da1","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.479434Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.461989Z","title":"Deep cnn-based blind image quality predictor,","venue":null,"work_id":"825bd2c0-dac9-467a-8c38-e8bedf22d81b","year":2019},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.15485","last_updated":"2025-01-26T11:09:16Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T08:09:49.066155Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-26T11:09:16Z","title":"Differentiable Low-computation Global Correlation Loss for Monotonicity Evaluation in Quality Assessment","version":1},"reference_index":23,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.072539Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.15485"},"observation_digest":"sha256:677251f1f859b7c8903e4730f734f99e2a0c24625127cac3956e593449411be7","observation_id":"e960c731-6769-4728-bdcf-f66ad3100e89","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.466402Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.449298Z","title":"Hallucinated-iqa: No-reference image quality assessment via adversarial learning,","venue":null,"work_id":"c57adb0d-d58f-4f33-8290-65533ef179c6","year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.15485","last_updated":"2025-01-26T11:09:16Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T08:09:49.066155Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-26T11:09:16Z","title":"Differentiable Low-computation Global Correlation Loss for Monotonicity Evaluation in Quality Assessment","version":1},"reference_index":24,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.076613Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.15485"},"observation_digest":"sha256:568f221afb9a93fabd9ba9d6dcb17af284691ea05767cfc2fcc08b242614c122","observation_id":"0e4e3a34-6a07-4c14-a402-1bef918f9b34","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.453552Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.435861Z","title":"Blind predicting similar quality map for image quality assessment,","venue":null,"work_id":"df066e38-70fd-460d-9e75-8096b0677820","year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.15485","last_updated":"2025-01-26T11:09:16Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T08:09:49.066155Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-26T11:09:16Z","title":"Differentiable Low-computation Global Correlation Loss for Monotonicity Evaluation in Quality Assessment","version":1},"reference_index":25,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.080810Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.15485"},"observation_digest":"sha256:86c5fa7392b9878bb0e25335723717cf040490ea4f3e82fec3dadaa6279b4da4","observation_id":"4044bb99-7910-4e63-9a8d-7a307edc067a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.440688Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.422356Z","title":"dipIQ: Blind image quality assessment by learning-to-rank discriminable image pairs,","venue":null,"work_id":"c758d127-750f-44a7-99c5-f1d0a10b2428","year":2017},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.15485","last_updated":"2025-01-26T11:09:16Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T08:09:49.066155Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-26T11:09:16Z","title":"Differentiable Low-computation Global Correlation Loss for Monotonicity Evaluation in Quality Assessment","version":1},"reference_index":26,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.085064Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.15485"},"observation_digest":"sha256:5c3a75102359fc08fd29809f515168193d3293e15a0a2ea39c50aee1b19b711c","observation_id":"4c72b38a-e4f8-412b-ab71-a1d01ca48dc6","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.426668Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.409331Z","title":"Blindly assess image quality in the wild guided by a self-adaptive hyper network,","venue":null,"work_id":"15760c36-0cf9-4612-aad8-8a8a56355dda","year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.15485","last_updated":"2025-01-26T11:09:16Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T08:09:49.066155Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-26T11:09:16Z","title":"Differentiable Low-computation Global Correlation Loss for Monotonicity Evaluation in Quality Assessment","version":1},"reference_index":27,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.089297Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.15485"},"observation_digest":"sha256:3790efd150cecae407dd8e9424fedb68eb2123784a10e288aaccc1c8c0e245f2","observation_id":"88d2a144-8954-4568-b153-728e250a606f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.413595Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.396296Z","title":"Point cloud projection and multi-scale feature fusion network based blind quality assessment for colored point clouds,","venue":null,"work_id":"9edc9c01-9583-4ce3-924f-6a3fd024cc5d","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.15485","last_updated":"2025-01-26T11:09:16Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T08:09:49.066155Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-26T11:09:16Z","title":"Differentiable Low-computation Global Correlation Loss for Monotonicity Evaluation in Quality Assessment","version":1},"reference_index":28,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.093225Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.15485"},"observation_digest":"sha256:4968fa7e9496dd4e797b04d32869e9cd3c2110706fc12d9b9beb83a2809de71f","observation_id":"c66f618c-88c2-4421-b711-f04c0a37200e","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.400822Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.383286Z","title":"PQA-Net: Deep no reference point cloud quality assessment via multi-view projection,","venue":null,"work_id":"d199cf02-3238-4412-8d12-3e9a0e601373","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.15485","last_updated":"2025-01-26T11:09:16Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T08:09:49.066155Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-26T11:09:16Z","title":"Differentiable Low-computation Global Correlation Loss for Monotonicity Evaluation in Quality Assessment","version":1},"reference_index":29,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.097474Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.15485"},"observation_digest":"sha256:831b1f71d67f215cc8ff25ef7d7090ea884780fdd81e26d9a35c3202e6ad1261","observation_id":"983fdf6c-50bc-466f-b63a-152352463cde","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.387449Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.370516Z","title":"No-reference point cloud quality assessment via domain adaptation,","venue":null,"work_id":"a5e9c4cd-8cbf-4466-9580-a527b063abec","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.15485","last_updated":"2025-01-26T11:09:16Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T08:09:49.066155Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-26T11:09:16Z","title":"Differentiable Low-computation Global Correlation Loss for Monotonicity Evaluation in Quality Assessment","version":1},"reference_index":30,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.101754Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.15485"},"observation_digest":"sha256:9885e4d42f3fe9b0a7fa0ec77d27abd1f26c3ea9d6b3bb8714109c82f2c09f1e","observation_id":"08cf7ef0-05a9-4ff5-b680-b268e4df97df","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.374649Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.357074Z","title":"A no-reference quality assessment metric for point cloud based on captured video sequences,","venue":null,"work_id":"98086b09-a660-4ffd-8e22-ed796f3e2e3a","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.15485","last_updated":"2025-01-26T11:09:16Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T08:09:49.066155Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-26T11:09:16Z","title":"Differentiable Low-computation Global Correlation Loss for Monotonicity Evaluation in Quality Assessment","version":1},"reference_index":31,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.106642Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.15485"},"observation_digest":"sha256:6bb68844d189246254a95f4e6fc567e9d779562f57efe92ce7130ededfc32d4e","observation_id":"8d364533-6d9f-4bb9-b64a-b61cc2660538","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.361448Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2208.14085","last_updated":"2023-12-06T08:26:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T14:36:51.581132Z","submitted_at":"2022-08-30T08:59:41Z","title":"Evaluating Point Cloud from Moving Camera Videos: A No-Reference Metric","version":3},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2208.14085","doi":null,"metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"2208.14085","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.192300Z","title":"Evaluating Point Cloud from Moving Camera Videos: A No-Reference Metric","venue":"cs.CV","work_id":"677c4cfe-39c7-4182-a604-ff1c66f94fdb","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.15485","last_updated":"2025-01-26T11:09:16Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T08:09:49.066155Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-26T11:09:16Z","title":"Differentiable Low-computation Global Correlation Loss for Monotonicity Evaluation in Quality Assessment","version":1},"reference_index":32,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.111417Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2208.14085","citing_paper":"/paper/2501.15485"},"observation_digest":"sha256:56f5e28b29a3c6fdfea4c83d80929cccb509cbb744da1f4044f25ee5979e8faa","observation_id":"923df555-3063-4621-96eb-7aa60dfe2088","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.199007Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.343864Z","title":"GPA-Net: No-reference point cloud quality assessment with multi-task graph convolutional network,","venue":null,"work_id":"5c6cd1f2-3a18-4cba-b7b9-44d37f7c9f60","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.15485","last_updated":"2025-01-26T11:09:16Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T08:09:49.066155Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-26T11:09:16Z","title":"Differentiable Low-computation Global Correlation Loss for Monotonicity Evaluation in Quality Assessment","version":1},"reference_index":33,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.116275Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.15485"},"observation_digest":"sha256:2c35e3163ae1175097f55d9937945d83ec253dad675820f15829d8bc94e70883","observation_id":"2744fb2d-bf9b-4d45-a15f-3e784400f8b1","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.348237Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.330972Z","title":"Most apparent distortion: full- reference image quality assessment and the role of strategy,","venue":null,"work_id":"f8c7a3bd-5b02-4b12-8b46-16385fb144ec","year":2010},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.15485","last_updated":"2025-01-26T11:09:16Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T08:09:49.066155Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-26T11:09:16Z","title":"Differentiable Low-computation Global Correlation Loss for Monotonicity Evaluation in Quality Assessment","version":1},"reference_index":34,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.120729Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.15485"},"observation_digest":"sha256:7d83016fc2f7e578a6c21ff5e785f078defeda50bff1ccf9e51a86fbace197fe","observation_id":"b768d4cf-7e65-435f-866d-9d961e677645","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.334996Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.315977Z","title":"A statistical evaluation of recent full reference image quality assessment algorithms,","venue":null,"work_id":"8ed7c867-2f2e-445e-9c31-03d26cb86ba4","year":2006},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.15485","last_updated":"2025-01-26T11:09:16Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T08:09:49.066155Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-26T11:09:16Z","title":"Differentiable Low-computation Global Correlation Loss for Monotonicity Evaluation in Quality Assessment","version":1},"reference_index":35,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.124568Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.15485"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a6f43a273040c649bce06d2167fff13030dd8379e4625ecbb8172ca901639f97","observation_id":"baf03f4f-e438-46b1-8c26-4a440ddb57d0","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.320705Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.301944Z","title":"Predicting the perceptual quality of point cloud: A 3d-to-2d projection-based exploration,","venue":null,"work_id":"d0036643-527a-44cb-b084-d7ce3e219a96","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.15485","last_updated":"2025-01-26T11:09:16Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T08:09:49.066155Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-26T11:09:16Z","title":"Differentiable Low-computation Global Correlation Loss for Monotonicity Evaluation in Quality Assessment","version":1},"reference_index":36,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.128205Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.15485"},"observation_digest":"sha256:ea515a73d7799ddbe715bce838cddbe86c3137c449a857516dd1655db87e1d3f","observation_id":"12820994-ae93-4b66-9c00-37c515d21c76","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.306416Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.288398Z","title":"Perceptual quality assessment of 3D point clouds,","venue":null,"work_id":"3ae6056a-7cf2-44e8-85d3-e940e7f82a08","year":2019},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.15485","last_updated":"2025-01-26T11:09:16Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T08:09:49.066155Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-26T11:09:16Z","title":"Differentiable Low-computation Global Correlation Loss for Monotonicity Evaluation in Quality Assessment","version":1},"reference_index":37,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.132009Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.15485"},"observation_digest":"sha256:13a420beb146a3487a9bd783a8ce9003215e6a020c9b5d34ba2407a1a90f7177","observation_id":"7fcc5cec-191a-49a9-8a77-d3e2bfe15f03","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.292853Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.274367Z","title":"Perceptual quality assessment of colored 3D point clouds,","venue":null,"work_id":"68ae0ee5-392c-4b9e-b579-0b4923aab87f","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.15485","last_updated":"2025-01-26T11:09:16Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T08:09:49.066155Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-26T11:09:16Z","title":"Differentiable Low-computation Global Correlation Loss for Monotonicity Evaluation in Quality Assessment","version":1},"reference_index":38,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.135748Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.15485"},"observation_digest":"sha256:74bc0ce5636c7c8f3102ee7c868b055a4af0c067ee7c5af1399f039a045a345f","observation_id":"0ca6af29-b70d-49f0-a3ce-6980850b732d","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.278646Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.261227Z","title":"Deep neural networks for no-reference and full-reference image quality assessment,","venue":null,"work_id":"72df5ba0-5c8e-40e6-a1c2-1a4384ad4e9b","year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.15485","last_updated":"2025-01-26T11:09:16Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T08:09:49.066155Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-26T11:09:16Z","title":"Differentiable Low-computation Global Correlation Loss for Monotonicity Evaluation in Quality Assessment","version":1},"reference_index":39,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.139415Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.15485"},"observation_digest":"sha256:624206f63243d17a3fe961f3224018f9e81de281028f2011a51d4759c7ae80bb","observation_id":"8a847e56-d474-44d0-9774-9ebff6f2472a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.265511Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1708.08190","last_updated":"2017-12-05T04:55:26Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T05:56:52.647438Z","submitted_at":"2017-08-28T05:09:44Z","title":"A Probabilistic Quality Representation Approach to Deep Blind Image Quality Prediction","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"1708.08190","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.143016Z","title":"A probabilistic quality represen- tation approach to deep blind image quality prediction,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2017},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.15485","last_updated":"2025-01-26T11:09:16Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T08:09:49.066155Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-26T11:09:16Z","title":"Differentiable Low-computation Global Correlation Loss for Monotonicity Evaluation in Quality Assessment","version":1},"reference_index":40,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.143016Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/1708.08190","citing_paper":"/paper/2501.15485"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c0b46322f4a433c213a12bc31efae4d2aa2b59acea9f2e59a493891f4eaccec5","observation_id":"f6a6dcb9-0649-4980-833f-9933617d6089","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:18:07.143016Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}}],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.15485","last_updated":"2025-01-26T11:09:16Z","latest_version":1,"primary_category":"eess.IV","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T08:09:49.066155Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-26T11:09:16Z","title":"Differentiable Low-computation Global Correlation Loss for Monotonicity Evaluation in Quality Assessment"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":39,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":4,"verified_exact":3,"verified_fuzzy":32},"total_outbound_references":39},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 14 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 39 of 39 outbound references and 0 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2501.15485."}