{"as_of":"2026-08-11T04:17:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:3d86595fc1fa7a83582288610aa33ab80c701e873c6a51a38cba58d0c93fe968","coverage":[{"denominator":107,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":100,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.894637Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":100,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":100,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":0,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"cited_works","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2501.18129/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2501.18129/integrity","json":"/paper/2501.18129/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"outbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.575197Z","title":"Gender differences in research productivity: A bibliometric analysis of the Italian academic system","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2009},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":1,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.575197Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b8f9d532e94a8d2943f23ca770e9456fdf77ebdadaec37870791054eba9c862a","observation_id":"68155a76-cf50-4e1e-9827-86beb3e2fc34","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.575197Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.578886Z","title":"Limited progress in improving gender and geographic representation in coral reef science","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":2,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.578886Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:9d4e24c7cc3f608cd4ea0b3e8e4d5d27972417905f260383da0b683f58f6eee3","observation_id":"6006097c-017c-4c4e-9469-6270144cfc3c","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.578886Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.582243Z","title":"Fast facts: Academia, 2024","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":3,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.582243Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:81f320e085ac9de5cd5346e301035777d509af982952bb08540da46d12d55d95","observation_id":"b6436323-526f-489e-aafa-b57e2169e638","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.582243Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":"10.15195/v7.a7","metadata_source":"openalex","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T05:30:23.456663Z","title":"Self-Citation, Cumulative Advantage, and Gender Inequality in Science","venue":"Sociological Science","work_id":"1ebbd97f-8896-4dec-a8b1-e8576c829d48","year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":4,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.585516Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:ad468ab3471c347b97156b23a5d059995a1ab0590f273f2c4fe2345dbfc9e20b","observation_id":"a661f192-b9d7-45db-bd04-230ac053714f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.162589Z","resolver_source":"doi_truncated","status":"malformed_identifier"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:30:57.382061+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0256474","metadata_source":"openalex","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T05:30:23.456663Z","title":"Twenty years of gender equality research: A scoping review based on a new semantic indicator","venue":"PLoS ONE","work_id":"aa9a6204-583f-4ffb-8d71-fc6427f6e772","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":5,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.588783Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b94ec5e3e3d5e23b5f437993a6da7899f6bb1d60eb34f3317603490c1a3ebdbc","observation_id":"0b92621f-54cb-494d-b5c9-7f23cbfa03bf","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.151526Z","resolver_source":"doi","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[{"edge_observation":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:18:04.78175+00:00","source":"paper_reference_links","state":"open"},"event_date":"2021-11-09","event_type":"correction","notice_doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0259930","provenance":{"observed_at":"2026-07-11T02:58:09.152463+00:00","source":"crossref","source_record_id":"10.1371/journal.pone.0259930->10.1371/journal.pone.0256474:correction"}}],"reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:30:57.382061+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.592145Z","title":"Gen- der disparities in high-quality research revealed by nature index journals","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":6,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.592145Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b4910d04727b002942c7bb8ea5b1d05c278f5eed600c590e59f92db739a05bbb","observation_id":"3f474682-0165-4fcf-86b8-e1172cb14f8f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.592145Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.595344Z","title":"Gender disparities in authorships and citations in transplantation research","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":7,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.595344Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:861bf2855f3873ed3b33491a8a335e464ed5c532624664230efbddb2f4ebb148","observation_id":"af82bf5d-65ed-4a59-85e3-93ca8d7d8368","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.595344Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":"10.1038/s41550-017-0141","metadata_source":"openalex","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T05:30:23.456663Z","title":"Quantitative evaluation of gender bias in astronomical publications from citation counts","venue":"Nature Astronomy","work_id":"c16e8620-c3ca-4898-9a87-689c3984fe38","year":2017},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":8,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.598328Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:9e6771ed8c305a628dc347ec0d5e9481e2be5a9489575f24d5c2f3e90944c409","observation_id":"4b3ee823-183b-4ca7-a190-e9e72f517b63","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.141156Z","resolver_source":"doi","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[{"edge_observation":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:18:04.695296+00:00","source":"paper_reference_links","state":"open"},"event_date":"2017-06-19","event_type":"correction","notice_doi":"10.1038/s41550-017-0182","provenance":{"observed_at":"2026-07-11T02:57:25.945827+00:00","source":"crossref","source_record_id":"10.1038/s41550-017-0182->10.1038/s41550-017-0141:correction"}}],"reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:30:57.382061+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.601052Z","title":"Are referees and editors in economics gender neutral? The Quarterly Journal of Economics , 135(1):269–327, 2020","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":9,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.601052Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f0371820abd192d11d7ce28b9cbc654edba2aafb6feceb9e709782449ec9859b","observation_id":"4569613c-cd18-4a39-a36e-9cfede74218c","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.601052Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.603816Z","title":"Gender bias in academic recruitment? evidence from a survey experiment in the nordic region","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":10,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.603816Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:617a006483e0da4e6e5b04bf0fee6f82594fc08faa1817bc318bc501c0e59a3b","observation_id":"744f2476-4215-4041-a251-c7dac5675249","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.603816Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.606567Z","title":"Gender differences in academic medicine: retention, rank, and leadership comparisons from the national faculty survey","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":11,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.606567Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:7dd8da2cef0dec7b47b11b6516e4092e9e1043d8897a61438763d8d52a96d807","observation_id":"73a59f8e-f83c-43a3-b31f-1929ade6510f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.606567Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.609451Z","title":"Gender comparisons of social work faculty using h-index scores","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2017},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":12,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.609451Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:fb8ce8fd25bd03a857f323c9aebd66af3bee3d2fa87febc5d68a3abfd99b4b7f","observation_id":"33d92137-2c26-43b3-b212-57eab2a51247","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.609451Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":"10.1002/jnr.24631","metadata_source":"openalex","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T05:30:23.456663Z","title":"Gender inequality in academia: Problems and solutions for women faculty in stem","venue":"Journal of Neuroscience Research","work_id":"90274091-d955-473d-a82d-85aeac7aa1c3","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":13,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.612681Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:69d50f0ffe092420e3010d3c8a19a079f2e09756652c544986483e1f6a7dd45b","observation_id":"aaad4478-7728-4144-af69-a97123c326ef","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.130199Z","resolver_source":"doi","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:30:57.382061+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2021.14509","doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.647193Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"f2f50940-47aa-4bba-94eb-240fee32ee10","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":14,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.616043Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:ef8734135aee812e32f7d03fb25488738a39a3f13d336d93b719be283b40f551","observation_id":"05ebe1b4-b431-41b9-aa9f-5ddab0e86c08","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.652477Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:30:57.382061+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.619332Z","title":"Masculine defaults: Identifying and mitigating hidden cultural biases","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":15,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.619332Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:96fd8c978b762fcfc009ed04596ffb2100d66c2b60412bbc7d8c28ca166d5641","observation_id":"b951266c-0515-4961-b644-bc84b37892d8","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.619332Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.622527Z","title":"A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":1960},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":16,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.622527Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:3fb22778bc9828181f7460a3c3a39be3a7becffdc73c15de718ec621b930ac5c","observation_id":"2ac90e2a-84c1-4e2b-bac5-a8f22c9e8486","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.622527Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.625738Z","title":"2023 cra taulbee survey report, 2024","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":17,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.625738Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e2932e5f4829e75b07fe8ee2772d17a786d5f41a1a5f4d0302d26858ac1024a3","observation_id":"fff167c3-fe14-4ec7-a2bb-bcab705b9b5c","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.625738Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.628870Z","title":"Lack of gender bias in citation rates of publications by dendrochronologists: What is unique about this discipline? Tree-Ring Research, 66(2):127–133, 2010","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2010},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":18,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.628870Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a36c266cc9541432492102dc79517d8f41137fd135025506c3abc25eef439cc0","observation_id":"2de6a136-1725-4134-8960-f2ba63a6ed4c","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.628870Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.632259Z","title":"Gendered citation patterns across political science and social science methodology fields","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":19,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.632259Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:d42ed3bfcb938fac88cfb46f2c2d4029cf2fa2597111d2061ce0244ee7625c68","observation_id":"78f46908-6592-4519-b5b8-1a9995b64648","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.632259Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":"10.24963/ijcai.2024/800","metadata_source":"openalex","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T05:30:23.456663Z","title":"For the misgendered chinese in gender bias research: Multi-task learning with knowledge distillation for pinyin name gender prediction","venue":null,"work_id":"be23c599-ce20-4ac2-905c-3845f3f128c5","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":20,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.635775Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c324ae87936dbd10a25599affe07a89298a4df672faae422a05d5d809317a37a","observation_id":"30993679-9be3-477b-9b2c-c7105020584d","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.119756Z","resolver_source":"doi","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:30:57.382061+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.639288Z","title":"Dworkin, Kristin A","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":21,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.639288Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:8d59e6834b75b4cc40ea7fade13a55e5a9364c9b1fb66a4f91fdcd448866b913","observation_id":"fc76742a-ac46-4fb7-9d21-db84671b64c8","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.639288Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.642559Z","title":"Gender differences in author- ships are not associated with publication bias in an evolutionary journal","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":22,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.642559Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:7d395f639c5c01f6b1d60c589f0d7b71aa8358518cc80ae8c970ecbce793d1df","observation_id":"ca923af2-97f0-4de3-818f-bde676e1ef7f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.642559Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.645920Z","title":"Gender disparities in scholarly productivity within aca- demic otolaryngology departments","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2013},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":23,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.645920Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:aa1a809a593ca647ebc2bd3078c33ebbe1e623d7a26e7d67ce6e78edc6c32e18","observation_id":"293b0a5a-8b25-47fa-8dbc-13de5387e4dd","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.645920Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.648904Z","title":"Trends and comparison of female first authorship in high impact medical journals: observational study (1994-2014)","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":1994},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":24,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.648904Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:522434ddd1dfc35a8009f5a4e002610754df5351578ac5932294b3fcc151cfaf","observation_id":"73559472-76aa-4a2c-a84d-870e4e5bcbdd","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.648904Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.652111Z","title":"Patterns of authorship in ecology and evolution: First, last, and corresponding authorship vary with gender and geography","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":25,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.652111Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f09f2ead965be7100057c53e0bcac16759c9b65bad573c5c4c9d6cbc65e92b22","observation_id":"0b0cf413-808c-4250-b8b8-ca8370d2a7a4","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.652111Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.655209Z","title":"Gender (im) balance in citation practices in cognitive neuroscience","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":26,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.655209Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:33db305197bdf9f91a8468352bd1e4d2d3025e6a4d0121c2aabb7f5044be1550","observation_id":"a929fce6-e903-4bd7-82e3-6cb5952bb5bb","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.655209Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.658391Z","title":"Comparison of the contri- butions of female and male authors to medical research in 2000 and 2015: a cross-sectional study","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2000},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":27,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.658391Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:2c52f67f0fbb4104e655c70977eedf291f71ac6e6a46047da15bcb2192712e07","observation_id":"10b35a3c-fbe3-45e7-9ddb-b2abff89a832","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.658391Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.661907Z","title":"Datasheets for datasets","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":28,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.661907Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:fec543e3eb8040b5a21949f86d3749ff7b40cc1e1d9827d15861230274628b47","observation_id":"e1bc9606-ff58-4d40-a93f-425f83d84919","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.661907Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.665218Z","title":"Contemporary psychology and women: A gender analysis of the scientific production","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2019},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":29,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.665218Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:2fe34afc4ee8a1936b4203c67f7b3e18b534f6681284cca8a5c44ca7dc5faf19","observation_id":"aa5fa39e-07aa-4dbb-91be-68c9ebf77a43","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.665218Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":"10.1007/s11211-022-00398-z","metadata_source":"openalex","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T05:30:23.456663Z","title":"Giummarra","venue":"Social Justice Research","work_id":"9a7728b2-b5b2-4e5b-9972-fa0bf5670006","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":30,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.668456Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c628a7007d36e77605865f9d6fdf3552e5e8ed849a21c69a22a5e1762ae9bb7a","observation_id":"fdeeae4b-26ac-4c73-9751-a067be62bca6","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.104209Z","resolver_source":"doi","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:30:57.382061+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.671890Z","title":"Women are underrepresented and receive differential outcomes at asm journals: a six-year retrospective analysis","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":31,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.671890Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:d105f22aed91ab06751509487314baf346b5448e228a46d901f8d4ca6cf970ac","observation_id":"296b4f85-a3f0-4826-9f58-9f2343e423d6","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.671890Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2009.10830","last_updated":"2020-09-22T21:33:03Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-11T03:40:24.309781Z","submitted_at":"2020-09-22T21:33:03Z","title":"Explaining Gender Differences in Academics' Career Trajectories","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2009.10830","doi":null,"metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"2009.10830","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.569324Z","title":"Explaining Gender Differences in Academics' Career Trajectories","venue":"cs.SI","work_id":"f8fdb4c3-dedd-49d0-ac88-cbca515c6207","year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":32,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.675012Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2009.10830","citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:43082db7f237b5ed7e2df1714df60bd51392dd3a0635824e95410721799e57cd","observation_id":"5e6ef3dd-9664-45a7-ab0f-fb4cfb95a8e5","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.573788Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:30:57.382061+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"4537.00234","doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.550512Z","title":"Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent women’s ascent up the organizational ladder","venue":null,"work_id":"043be31a-a909-4004-966e-630f56090aa5","year":2001},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":33,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.678577Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:eb504a7ca42d64ebb27267bca74a066513f90e3c057758354c8a61692b6fcfdc","observation_id":"ce9f8f64-99e1-4232-9e8e-c6829e8a66e5","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.556070Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:30:57.382061+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.681866Z","title":"The gender gap in science: How long until women are equally represented? PLoS biology, 16(4):e2004956, 2018","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":34,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.681866Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:2fd9d81060ed18b8398852972d5fd8ad13941ac4377c4a4cb063de523e59c52b","observation_id":"6b12372b-1b45-4c81-93fa-ad32d8d939f4","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.681866Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.685753Z","title":"Gates, Roberta Sinatra, and Albert-L´ aszl´ o Barab´ asi","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":35,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.685753Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:3b196aa97a0fc4248baa0fd617561661cb0b9df43de4239bb0dfe68151313044","observation_id":"f75957e5-71bc-48cc-8434-cdb571ffc686","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.685753Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"malformed_identifier"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.689645Z","title":"Covid-19 effect on the gender gap in academic publishing","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":36,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.689645Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a2de5104a82ef8a5a14c32bf3e51f99d4944a97781e76e9d345705f2411e7147","observation_id":"e649b996-f334-458d-ac02-fe7a7cf4951e","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.689645Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.693037Z","title":"The effect of data pre-processing on understanding the evolution of collaboration networks","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2015},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":37,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.693037Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:668e835db547446c2ab60982248ba2d4d3fb3a64057cfe30d1a1a49fda6c9e48","observation_id":"09cb7d84-9792-4691-bf4a-42a9e8866af1","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.693037Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":"10.1002/asi.23489","metadata_source":"openalex","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T05:30:23.456663Z","title":"Distortive effects of initial-based name disambiguation on measurements of large-scale coauthorship networks","venue":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology","work_id":"5daad2cd-c493-4b7b-85f8-09da72e286a4","year":2016},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":38,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.696254Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:50aa00153aa1c01cf5e431609edf68834462968ab0a25ded8236534bb67eb6c5","observation_id":"079a571f-17d1-43a9-9690-453dbc244420","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.088640Z","resolver_source":"doi","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:30:57.382061+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.699745Z","title":"The impact of name ambiguity on properties of coauthorship networks","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2014},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":39,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.699745Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:405fb8a1b9b470a65f606ddf3079ce801fe57bc17a435dbb9676f860fa112a98","observation_id":"857fbb11-fe56-4db5-bc4c-ebf12ab3bcc9","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.699745Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":"10.1177/23780231211006977","metadata_source":"openalex","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T05:30:23.456663Z","title":"King and Megan E","venue":"Socius Sociological Research for a Dynamic World","work_id":"1535e970-0d86-4783-8875-32ec48610e5c","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":40,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.702978Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:91b02cc190a17ce205f5fc39afe33960147559ef7854cc1e3b1ae99915f630e9","observation_id":"dc83b321-123f-4097-9179-7b6a4f2ebd5b","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.078095Z","resolver_source":"doi","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:30:57.382061+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.706247Z","title":"King, Carl T","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2017},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":41,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.706247Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:610316269407d339169b12b64bc908b45cb5b92bd959cfb47cd65a7532993ccb","observation_id":"c930ecc4-71fd-4e2f-9d1c-000865edcd40","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.706247Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.709673Z","title":"Influence of the first-mover advantage on the gender disparities in physics citations","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":42,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.709673Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:d9fdc184ceecbb4b2a661aed470e6156d9f5731d58e4960ef521ebd825a622e3","observation_id":"19da02bc-3b54-4f9e-86cc-37a7c0f3eb2c","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.709673Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:15.087514Z","title":"Inter- sectional inequalities in science","venue":null,"work_id":"5bdd4aaf-c43d-4648-9d5c-5ae7eb37bbc2","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":43,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.712948Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:ad65ef609e3dad223df9a4b424bb12a78fec40bb747e6e019467969ba6616026","observation_id":"09491012-2fe5-49c2-ae2a-82f25b829e95","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:15.090727Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:30:57.382061+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:15.078818Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"5685a3bb-5b96-4e75-a651-20f79fe325d4","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":44,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.716337Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:1a7da90da610fac8537f096ea90bdabff1f8f8bceac2ef5f1390b13f39d4475a","observation_id":"f472b694-a386-4ba5-adc3-b2ae52fa90f3","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:15.081745Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:30:57.382061+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":"10.1007/s11192-011-0369-y","metadata_source":"openalex","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T05:30:23.456663Z","title":"Sex differences in research funding, productivity and impact: an analysis of Qu´ ebec university professors","venue":"Scientometrics","work_id":"5ca34c26-3420-43e8-9b47-2f03be33709a","year":2011},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":45,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.719617Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e73cb1a416c4d9c4a1cfa1605be7b06d965bf0a00390a63018993c9cf5bef383","observation_id":"66485260-447c-47cd-bb44-308af059fd3d","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.054215Z","resolver_source":"doi","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:30:57.382061+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:15.069958Z","title":"Sugimoto","venue":null,"work_id":"ea27853c-1e48-4d36-835d-c3b06bbf477b","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":46,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.722749Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:fa227228f024b3f9aedc842f99e2d130609b6d78d2e5b48adbe1d74cf19b4852","observation_id":"24b19a5f-1ab6-47ba-8b14-4b2610ca5f42","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:15.072937Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:30:57.382061+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:15.058662Z","title":"Gender differences in how scientists present the importance of their research: observational study","venue":null,"work_id":"441f804d-93c0-4684-9c4b-bdf520230926","year":2019},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":47,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.729551Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:0eb48292f9b341976845b0730f7e587b897388b5cd68080962b3959a8f1aef88","observation_id":"b48a0ded-96b0-43e4-b145-4edca0a0ddf8","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:15.062636Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:30:57.382061+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":"10.1038/s41562-022-01498-1","metadata_source":"openalex","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T05:30:23.456663Z","title":"Gender inequality and self-publication are common among academic editors","venue":"Nature Human Behaviour","work_id":"ff4017bd-9bcd-4308-87f2-354038d51420","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":48,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.732897Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:4f9952b619f11f06b511a42493f03e86811217d59e8b3828d8e5f5ce6430242e","observation_id":"593729ae-acd3-4850-9047-fdb3fba2bad3","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.036184Z","resolver_source":"doi","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:30:57.382061+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:15.047362Z","title":"Name-based demographic inference and the unequal distribution of misrecognition","venue":null,"work_id":"94416267-84e4-4ef4-8393-eaf5126b6cc8","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":49,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.735980Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a7fdea367d612d30f54f3c93970e1d7901a69e67d3a6d87612c6951a38fca3e8","observation_id":"39cd3f8b-35d7-445b-8d7a-6ce30c4e9944","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:15.051274Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:30:57.382061+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:15.036704Z","title":"The voices of medical education scholarship: Describing the published landscape","venue":null,"work_id":"dd9f9723-2054-4d87-95fa-314abd9d92c2","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":50,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.738671Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:2b878f1938995762b4c201698770186a002a22d939ae9669f01f8aec903a3f71","observation_id":"52379717-d81a-4dd6-b9ff-eec2c6d290fc","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:15.040481Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:30:57.382061+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":"10.1017/s0020818313000209","metadata_source":"openalex","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T05:30:23.456663Z","title":null,"venue":"International Organization","work_id":"8b49d0e7-71f1-4fec-b2c3-3199270dcef8","year":2013},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":51,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.741578Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:eb4debdcf40dcbe209d2ffdb1707eb5e6836bca2df83819768b2aab7637bde30","observation_id":"e0aee16e-6fdf-4acc-bb90-525d9aeeec87","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.025278Z","resolver_source":"doi","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:30:57.382061+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:15.025409Z","title":"How does research productivity relate to gender? analyzing gender differences for multiple publication dimensions","venue":null,"work_id":"5bb53955-1e98-4124-b90b-6eb38558fa76","year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":52,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.744572Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:d124aa30c60e8181771334556da3c49179f8bb8b2b7d1fa0a57189ae1489ac19","observation_id":"350589ee-ad82-4286-9b26-a6a527214a31","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:15.029363Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:30:57.382061+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:15.014409Z","title":"Sex differences in academic rank and publication rate at top-ranked us neurology programs","venue":null,"work_id":"820d0f4d-7ef5-4018-a33f-9fbea741f2d2","year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":53,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.747447Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:97ff63c1a7cfe911b674c7476528f2a1be1fe5d64b128b88f0803c8db2baa344","observation_id":"4785997a-b11c-4a52-9077-5eb02cddacb5","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:15.018267Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:30:57.382061+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:15.003519Z","title":"What’s in a name? the frequency and geographic distributions of uk surnames","venue":null,"work_id":"df0a39c4-0ba6-46ae-b5ed-c408d865de93","year":2008},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":54,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.750075Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:72253f7056cdae0e57a5ff4876ae3875391df11faea9f88eb20b58c066b0f628","observation_id":"9ddae9ee-ec2b-4326-b309-e9027687b9dc","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:15.007639Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:30:57.382061+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.752577Z","title":"Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2012},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":55,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.752577Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:9e7999f57de2465b90e2f96aac63bfabb85170e7628867893bddfe9a5f6c781b","observation_id":"f6552f5f-58d0-4405-8418-f59a54051981","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.752577Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.988021Z","title":"The gender and geography of publishing: a review of sex/gender reporting and author representation in leading general medical and global health journals","venue":null,"work_id":"47e535a1-3453-43db-a80c-eee6670b6ac9","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":56,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.755213Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:ac53c92a12f3f36313696cc430b21ad2bdf54c2da53dba273db1f50852587aa8","observation_id":"b54593ee-2756-43ee-aa96-50b8dc7a7061","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.991728Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:30:57.382061+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.977918Z","title":"The effect of gender in the publication patterns in mathematics","venue":null,"work_id":"c6406e3e-7b0c-4715-ab82-6f3df940e05d","year":2016},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":57,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.758080Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:7697052872f3a5aa982ed230bfa6cf409a293dc4becdc401eff5d03ab1d7619c","observation_id":"cc3afd5e-b6b3-45e4-8731-69cad8496ba4","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.981426Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:30:57.382061+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0195773","metadata_source":"openalex","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T05:30:23.456663Z","title":"Fegley, Jana Diesner, and Vetle I","venue":"PLoS ONE","work_id":"f46a84af-8473-40e6-bb43-7c522f395bd1","year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":58,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.760812Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:00c0ee6a178021cbc6657dad45d852e916cdaae1b5f6895d89b6dcffd3d73762","observation_id":"46a3daa8-819c-43cd-b823-2cf0bc105f90","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.014592Z","resolver_source":"doi","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:30:57.382061+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.763991Z","title":"Model cards for model reporting","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2019},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":59,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.763991Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b2b175b5442da76514ee8feb733ac7a833c960fa0e013506527bfc5fe51600ae","observation_id":"59685a49-167c-410a-b51f-8d2e2857d6fd","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.763991Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.766825Z","title":"Mohammad","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":60,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.766825Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:38e89006994c248e2781c14e4051f2e0e8b586bdbf7bf0bd24b5f62b2ba78228","observation_id":"99d4f7cf-a8ac-4871-9ec7-8bd4706148b3","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.766825Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.969153Z","title":"Open science, communal culture, and women’s participation in the movement to improve science","venue":null,"work_id":"48bac3e7-3006-444d-a6b0-0dbe40c169dc","year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":61,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.769877Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b3044b24f5b1fe2a48ed785a74e8f6958f448fd4149698f2e72d2ac7c5ecaec9","observation_id":"128a2fac-5762-481e-a844-634dca6a9fef","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.972238Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:30:57.382061+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.960384Z","title":"The gendered nature of authorship","venue":null,"work_id":"6a5bebb0-cc53-437b-b9b6-443f26511ede","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":62,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.772792Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:0f0b7af18543e16e11f2485d97aeb4338295fece8e25d97d1f5bc22f5d89d9d7","observation_id":"8238d6ff-dcf2-4c12-9f80-d1e3957f5690","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.963305Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:30:57.382061+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.775792Z","title":"Gender inequality and research performance: moving beyond individual-meritocratic explanations of academic advancement","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2016},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":63,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.775792Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:6a63f7f090e08cf168abfec2cc88d3a110d2fbb948596b206a5447775e8454b9","observation_id":"e0680b8b-e022-40fe-ada5-478f2b4524bb","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.775792Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.951603Z","title":"Three decades of tourism scholarship: Gender, collaboration and research methods","venue":null,"work_id":"98cac6ad-deab-4c6e-836a-6543fc922139","year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":64,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.778894Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:89dcbc267327eae30172040b4932297fe6843a54826156b9b71450228dac2c43","observation_id":"50732d08-da3f-4711-bce8-ceb48f20a331","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.954469Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:30:57.382061+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.781972Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":65,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.781972Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c8ff6e54a6ad8eed7a54ebce203ea3d4f7b7435428da115ef481779184012ef7","observation_id":"d9d90cc5-6e65-416b-924a-74e4b48d096f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.781972Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.943253Z","title":"Gender gap or gender bias in peace research? publication patterns and citation rates for journal of peace research, 1983–2008","venue":null,"work_id":"20d5b582-6759-4f16-8058-8f4a802109ad","year":1983},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":66,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.784851Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:72bfb9ce63601d19c18b5783e55a514476c27f82131854e70e4605d3e09fddf5","observation_id":"9ade2189-805c-4931-96de-9543b1d8d3cb","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.946209Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:30:57.382061+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.934982Z","title":"Gender and geographical disparity in editorial boards of journals in psychology and neuroscience","venue":null,"work_id":"239a4e46-c6ef-4d51-8516-1433c1e6c0bf","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":67,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.788504Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:398e46ee4f860aab8bb708bc849ddbacba454b180b08dad81c8f85271a5fc913","observation_id":"5f04c9db-94fb-4b12-9322-d78d575d00a4","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.938067Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:30:57.382061+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":"10.1007/s11192-022-04383-w","metadata_source":"openalex","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T05:30:23.456663Z","title":"Gender disparities in Russian academia: a bibliometric analysis","venue":"Scientometrics","work_id":"fe89cb32-169c-4ad1-8f02-24a5d0507546","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":68,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.791965Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:1c38c4dc77f19fdbea409ec1164627cbf793cffdb8cf74667765ab7b28f3435c","observation_id":"dd107681-f199-4bb8-af82-588db99d5253","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.991575Z","resolver_source":"doi","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:30:57.382061+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.795361Z","title":"Do women undertake in- terdisciplinary research more than men, and do self-citations bias observed differ- ences? Quantitative Science Studies , 3(2):363–392, June 2022","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":69,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.795361Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:13455182edcc8c69c49a58dae567a3879cec7762ac01d1389be6a36a02f73c20","observation_id":"42c1e63e-1bed-4df5-906c-ff051e3298b0","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.795361Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"malformed_identifier"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.926797Z","title":"Gender disparity among leaders of canadian academic radiology departments","venue":null,"work_id":"2493148c-16c8-4629-b771-28fa87938dcc","year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":70,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.798646Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:644b64fa0269002fec2f2e47a020f402559a55ea3cf72dc882a6398d59803680","observation_id":"0f6a49aa-42b5-446b-83f5-27f1fa84ef9f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.929724Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:30:57.382061+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.917851Z","title":"Longitudinal analysis of gender differences in academic productivity among medical faculty across 24 medical schools in the united states","venue":null,"work_id":"8265dfb5-5b4f-40a8-ad13-fba5fe55b265","year":2016},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":71,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.801864Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:be183466a2d95730cbcd5ebfcc6ecb1e314f7e04074973f41e5e0f0a472e4b4e","observation_id":"eb86eeed-fb8c-4d27-be2e-2c81c17f6051","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.921426Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:30:57.382061+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2021.66473","doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.316189Z","title":"Gender Bias in the News: A Scalable Topic Modelling and Visualization Framework","venue":null,"work_id":"8ae14ed2-ccca-46d5-9d44-6a78086add1c","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":72,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.805205Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:5747eba849f6d3365b4b474592c39136e0a7767103ed982e4a1bb526fce9a951","observation_id":"133bffac-d04d-4d02-a3e9-5ae473c682e6","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.322743Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"metadata_mismatch"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:30:57.382061+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.908049Z","title":"Why status matters for inequality","venue":null,"work_id":"0f359977-2375-4359-81b3-c4b3398c2c95","year":2014},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":73,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.808610Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:0a556b62d65cfffcb3a6402439e82f3350a28f512103a2b64a8e3eb532d5a495","observation_id":"21aea308-3606-4476-8fd0-a6a3155eb2e3","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.911552Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:30:57.382061+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.811921Z","title":"Ross, Britta M","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":74,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.811921Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:53a758e9a2d48c8401816b5ef6fec0ad8d8ae78b0a5b9cf3356d3e1d10be8e99","observation_id":"7c63f36d-1d37-4b37-9915-d872a19ff577","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.811921Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.898434Z","title":"Male principal investigators (almost) don’t publish with women in ecology and zoology","venue":null,"work_id":"56e8d3a6-9889-4dca-8649-c0c73efdaafd","year":2019},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":75,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.815652Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:8d62069f747a9b9e1acfc1a0d951b8d6725975b995735757e6463d44cf06dbd0","observation_id":"8a590654-7a01-4fe7-bbd0-a9fd69a90e66","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.902009Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:30:57.382061+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.888713Z","title":"Comparison and benchmark of name-to-gender inference services","venue":null,"work_id":"ed4b4a89-273d-4574-a974-0e88166e7c85","year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":76,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.819053Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:72655de13991565c797cd7071f72a8a785999fa28eea68fe2733bce346bc6c9c","observation_id":"ce7e4f8a-5045-4172-aee4-fd42f018dfc5","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.892259Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:30:57.382061+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.822393Z","title":"Comparison and benchmark of name-to-gender inference services","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":77,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.822393Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:10f4e8fa5195776279cc36752330c1633934f8f1ac82d8190db76c3b31e5cebf","observation_id":"60b88125-24ec-42d6-ae9b-40e5da2d4aed","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.822393Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.878529Z","title":"The changing face of epidemiology: gender disparities in citations? Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.), 28(2):159, 2017","venue":null,"work_id":"0b45983f-fced-4871-9681-efb69371892f","year":2017},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":78,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.825900Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:8e323696219ec5f3bb0bf259f2c05d7b4319d2956422d7818c6a3dbcba90fb09","observation_id":"77afd33e-b40b-4a48-a83c-cdd0f8b8f686","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.882341Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:30:57.382061+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.868890Z","title":"Gender differences in peer reviewed grant applica- tions, awards, and amounts: a systematic review and meta-analysis","venue":null,"work_id":"de34cb7a-adaf-464f-9758-a18ce4f42676","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":79,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.829270Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e267474c60113e1840ffaf1442f7a807af344ecd7880586474e1df1412240399","observation_id":"6f74596d-9707-4184-9b49-afdc1fdf5253","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.872440Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:30:57.382061+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.859249Z","title":"Inequality quantified: Mind the gender gap","venue":null,"work_id":"7ba0ec5c-ecf6-4220-9a96-d6546a9d0753","year":2013},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":80,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.832660Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:7cf43632701749e07472db46c730e579a76b20b6a49ef8936f55db1103c1c92b","observation_id":"749378e4-d8b3-4b26-8f8e-ec7a118853e8","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.862862Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:30:57.382061+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.849660Z","title":"The kappa statistic in reliability studies: use, interpretation, and sample size requirements","venue":null,"work_id":"ba8027a8-084c-4b99-8fe3-a3e2464c8072","year":2005},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":81,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.835941Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e2e0da54e94a25b9c29ebfdbd5e3f1a1dbffb885e31c3f6f3ac088ad2dac00e9","observation_id":"0363779a-1415-4baa-ab88-37f21e88f4c3","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.852939Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:30:57.382061+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.841144Z","title":"Peer re- view and gender bias: A study on 145 scholarly journals","venue":null,"work_id":"3db49976-d6a8-4228-98ef-1180a0d55b7a","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":82,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.839283Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:07cff6a97b7fbdd86ad55fc74cd81d41cb6fcc238ab5b5943cdaf838a170d623","observation_id":"f9fafe70-f707-4e0a-bd9b-0c0ffc4efa70","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.844137Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:30:57.382061+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.832158Z","title":"Gender gap in journal submissions and peer review during the first wave of the covid-19 pandemic","venue":null,"work_id":"c8ca9705-1bce-4777-a2b7-dee5ac055549","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":83,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.842681Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:78ff5eca40b8543edb0c216fb5548cbbc997209b49c871f977ac57bda0471a4a","observation_id":"28e7569e-9566-41a2-b861-cf82543e5091","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.835144Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:30:57.382061+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.823022Z","title":"Gender differences in publication productivity among academic scientists and engineers in the us and china: similarities and differences","venue":null,"work_id":"13497f0b-e34c-4064-a508-cd1a73ba78fe","year":2017},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":84,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.845898Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c2d5ced792e34e10c712f7e8cb687edd30d0a6a5d3c88c3082edd79f94bf852d","observation_id":"ece86646-3585-480f-b41c-b585d23b0117","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.826161Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:30:57.382061+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.814772Z","title":"Teich, Jason Z","venue":null,"work_id":"e86915cb-c705-46c1-9093-845708dc3fa7","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":85,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.849008Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:78be2c8202fc198f7fca429e83962f0e1b6dcfbcfcbf9019aefcc03de869b336","observation_id":"6418a550-eb31-441c-a783-9626b987e267","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.817616Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"malformed_identifier"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:30:57.382061+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.806033Z","title":"Gender differences in citation impact for 27 fields and six english-speaking countries 1996–2014","venue":null,"work_id":"94caa354-7d0a-4f6a-8e70-889bee3bdcd4","year":1996},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":86,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.852233Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a7e6314baa4a1638e4686839478427fa67c3d1e32cbbd5577c7bfcd58d162095","observation_id":"c33f9563-c967-4b58-a35c-83167e630a12","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.809099Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:30:57.382061+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.797327Z","title":"Gender disparities in invited commentary authorship in 2459 medical journals","venue":null,"work_id":"afd2a717-8789-4f3f-a211-e95929599989","year":2019},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":87,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.854871Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:4cde7f595a4b5ea004cb04d9acd3a2a2ad3427b9251725cec68224b056188c69","observation_id":"4eba156c-7dc2-4573-9f1e-8685f0430500","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.800408Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:30:57.382061+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.787337Z","title":"Gendec: A machine learning-based framework for gender detection from japanese names","venue":null,"work_id":"dc6fb8b8-ad64-44e3-8bb9-03f33349b302","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":88,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.857571Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:d73b53529cfee096cdf9b5bf8cb4b8e16f2c9a34c9fadf4e6bdb0a9618956019","observation_id":"f54fd6bc-099a-4ba8-90fa-fb04e1c3a0d6","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.791136Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:30:57.382061+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.777004Z","title":"Ethnea–an instance-based ethnicity classifier based on geo-coded author names in a large-scale bibliographic database","venue":null,"work_id":"855e8664-72b0-44d5-a827-8bb8fbea393e","year":2016},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":89,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.860298Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:0ffdbcb5b1ff6b7041ca60c7b2345aee58840c34c19b6ac22eea26986c5ed4ad","observation_id":"3a116b05-f5c4-47ec-a9a4-8fe907f195fd","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.780749Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:30:57.382061+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.766910Z","title":"Gender identification in chinese names","venue":null,"work_id":"6cf128c0-9c9f-437c-9ed5-3ccfdf476e95","year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":90,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.863106Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:8abdd7ae6ff1af3c4cb5fb410273daeb42b1ffd47aa4314c3b16c4676081f396","observation_id":"52e333bc-defd-492f-8360-34d589751af3","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.770367Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:30:57.382061+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.756456Z","title":"Gender differences in research performance and its impact on careers: a longitudinal case study","venue":null,"work_id":"f5a1af79-57fe-4e83-94a7-e8bfdfd0a5dc","year":2016},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":91,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.866204Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a7041b5b5091d1ee6338a335326cfab1c9e7f7c2e657d06e9eeade610b0bb7a8","observation_id":"b4e26b1f-8bfa-4e0e-9c95-cd4e2fd46e15","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.760001Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:30:57.382061+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.745294Z","title":"Vicious circles of gender bias, lower positions, and lower performance: Gender differences in scholarly productivity and impact","venue":null,"work_id":"6cdbd494-03da-449f-be3b-b20dfd82d3d8","year":2017},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":92,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.868954Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:5e0dbc96bac9008ac782145470a29f4d942d739133d442f30ee407d1c5cbcda0","observation_id":"89656989-2707-4f91-90aa-be9370e1d144","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.749686Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:30:57.382061+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.734287Z","title":"Gender differences in authorship of critical care literature","venue":null,"work_id":"a5718034-c30f-4e27-bf5f-44ec1b3f0e06","year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":93,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.871703Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:ae1ec7e2b1969abdc50b7029c3a7ae23cf264a55f41eafe35ac4a68d2d0ce2a6","observation_id":"1d3a884b-0c5f-4dd3-9788-9d14de9a309a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.738128Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:30:57.382061+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.874436Z","title":"Gender inequities in the online dissemination of scholars’ work","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":94,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.874436Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:369300c4ecc00878255f6ec3e5e25cda11f429284c53398a289367a4f865f1b0","observation_id":"3e8168f2-56d9-49e6-8b16-c0f41606521b","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.874436Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.723187Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"e03469df-2bbe-40bd-8574-f85d67c39f41","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":95,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.877244Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a87940f07eda1beec9a09ca31dd88ae3fa4fe36a410decad847c86ceea9f6eb1","observation_id":"08b152fd-2fd6-4474-b5a9-0151f267768f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.726753Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:30:57.382061+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.713748Z","title":"The role of gender in scholarly authorship","venue":null,"work_id":"c9170e0c-21ae-4aba-9895-7e3e4cec27d1","year":2013},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":96,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.883272Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:189cfe20dd2016b58eb98f1b0dd131db98f0f961ae88741cc6dfea8e732f590c","observation_id":"05a9c473-bdf6-41f0-a2a5-d9c2d345b934","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.716829Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:30:57.382061+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.885982Z","title":"National hiring experiments reveal 2: 1 faculty preference for women on stem tenure track","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2015},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":97,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.885982Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e46930e003d474d451774bf9586f5216f87fa33e42d40958caf2eead25256627","observation_id":"5c7fca50-c8a4-4b7f-acb1-c095de5f04bc","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.885982Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":"10.1111/soc4.13189","metadata_source":"openalex","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T05:30:23.456663Z","title":"The gender citation gap: Approaches, explanations, and implications","venue":"Sociology Compass","work_id":"944a4b72-bcdf-4a56-95f0-5a21172f90ca","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":98,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.888995Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e077b14690f82629fba4cdf48f8540f2a74b63c20f59e135cf8c360abf5affea","observation_id":"68e5e818-72b4-480e-8a76-e31dba2ffa48","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.950352Z","resolver_source":"doi","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:30:57.382061+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.703948Z","title":"The gender gap in commenting: Women are less likely than men to comment on (men’s) published research.PLoS One, 15(4):e0230043, 2020","venue":null,"work_id":"8e72daf4-eff2-445d-9918-3e497e100cc7","year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":99,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.891940Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:d017c7e93daa921bcfad3b49859053212b932d41c90e8689406eb6dba5776d69","observation_id":"fc19d34c-4f15-4a9f-835e-1ded6dd1afc7","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.707563Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:30:57.382061+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.694253Z","title":"Trends in female authorship in major journals of 3 oncology disciplines, 2002-2018","venue":null,"work_id":"6e7167b9-17c9-41cf-a9da-c22441758641","year":2002},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":100,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.894637Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:ea76413bbe35513dae8192d13a8528e74b91bb775d9d67808e2db08d9f2a887a","observation_id":"a8497f26-6037-4398-b582-0d9755c73552","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.697990Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:30:57.382061+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}}],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","latest_version":1,"primary_category":"cs.DL","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T18:25:05.064073Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":100,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":4,"metadata_mismatch":1,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":41,"verified_exact":16,"verified_fuzzy":38},"total_outbound_references":107},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:30:57.382061+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 11 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 100 of 107 outbound references and 0 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2501.18129."}