{"as_of":"2026-08-20T06:15:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:51f5041b3823717ff56c15f8ecb1ac5592dfcf3718be94acdb86d13e5061755b","coverage":[{"denominator":2,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":2,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-09T23:36:45.569022Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":2,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":2,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":0,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"cited_works","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2501.18415/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2501.18415/integrity","json":"/paper/2501.18415/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2501.18415"},"outbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T23:36:45.620671Z","title":"In Silico World: Lowering barriers to ubiquitous adoption of In Silico Trials","venue":null,"work_id":"17639b0f-8768-48bb-9454-15f32ed2a845","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18415","last_updated":"2025-01-30T15:14:30Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T23:32:27.144171Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T15:14:30Z","title":"Consensus statement on the credibility assessment of ML predictors","version":1},"reference_index":6,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-09T23:36:45.562205Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18415"},"observation_digest":"sha256:64e486408d5ccf153d68d18142016addc27bf43fd1aaae1d0cb72af077095f52","observation_id":"48f6ebd3-84e0-4e7b-9b1b-dc251351c4e4","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T23:36:45.625506Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:39.956319+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T23:36:45.601922Z","title":"The wisdom hierarchy: representations of the DIKW hierarchy","venue":null,"work_id":"a3ad1578-8c5e-4b5b-a395-ec4e76a1311a","year":2007},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18415","last_updated":"2025-01-30T15:14:30Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T23:32:27.144171Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T15:14:30Z","title":"Consensus statement on the credibility assessment of ML predictors","version":1},"reference_index":11,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-09T23:36:45.569022Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18415"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a235f2380790fd359d0276bf7fbb07f36d73f124314a43bd62649c773d2d784d","observation_id":"b642902e-8fad-4ebe-83fb-820c3efc4c27","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T23:36:45.608565Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:39.956319+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}}],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18415","last_updated":"2025-01-30T15:14:30Z","latest_version":1,"primary_category":"q-bio.QM","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T23:32:27.144171Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T15:14:30Z","title":"Consensus statement on the credibility assessment of ML predictors"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":2,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":0,"verified_exact":0,"verified_fuzzy":2},"total_outbound_references":2},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:39.956319+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 20 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 2 of 2 outbound references and 0 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2501.18415."}