{"as_of":"2026-08-08T15:20:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:ba27c60442d3bbab419be4dd58f12478709a8df1e5f35952cafe3b2db0bff802","coverage":[{"denominator":33,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":33,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.539623Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":35,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":35,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":2,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":2,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T12:36:37.665715Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"pith","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:06:37.437709Z","state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2502.08839","last_updated":"2025-03-04T19:34:57Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:28:31.393319Z","submitted_at":"2025-02-12T23:13:01Z","title":"Assessing Quantum Layout Synthesis Tools via Known Optimal-SWAP Cost Benchmarks","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2502.08839","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T12:36:37.665715Z","title":"Assessing quantum layout synthesis tools via known optimal-swap cost benchmarks,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.24169","last_updated":"2025-05-30T03:24:22Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T12:29:44.599270Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-30T03:24:22Z","title":"A High-Performance Multilevel Framework for Quantum Layout Synthesis","version":1},"reference_index":32,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T12:36:37.665715Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2502.08839","citing_paper":"/paper/2505.24169"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a7ce5b89935d27c6ea9a5cc69cf002826a0f7b19a7af3d91a083a8b7c418cf33","observation_id":"51f0f46d-8efc-489a-b9f8-d4913fec0c81","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T12:36:37.665715Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2502.08839","last_updated":"2025-03-04T19:34:57Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:28:31.393319Z","submitted_at":"2025-02-12T23:13:01Z","title":"Assessing Quantum Layout Synthesis Tools via Known Optimal-SWAP Cost Benchmarks","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2502.08839","doi":null,"metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"2502.08839","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:06:37.437709Z","title":"Assessing Quantum Layout Synthesis Tools via Known Optimal-SWAP Cost Benchmarks","venue":"quant-ph","work_id":"36731aa3-5319-4d3d-b12c-79c7c45ce2bc","year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.12199","last_updated":"2025-07-16T12:55:09Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T12:01:18.260124Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-16T12:55:09Z","title":"Optimized Qubit Routing for Commuting Gates via Integer Programming","version":1},"reference_index":34,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:06:34.719973Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2502.08839","citing_paper":"/paper/2507.12199"},"observation_digest":"sha256:9272642444c811c5739e02226ecef31e910b2b1aff38a277c58143b6afffb843","observation_id":"aaa14d3d-71ae-4658-a7d8-c21823d5ab30","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:06:37.513908Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}}],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2502.08839/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2502.08839/integrity","json":"/paper/2502.08839/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2502.08839"},"outbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.405336Z","title":"Qubit allocation","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2502.08839","last_updated":"2025-03-04T19:34:57Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:28:31.393319Z","submitted_at":"2025-02-12T23:13:01Z","title":"Assessing Quantum Layout Synthesis Tools via Known Optimal-SWAP Cost Benchmarks","version":2},"reference_index":1,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.405336Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2502.08839"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a235d009134548410698ca09d27027743064c3c41f2642f49c636d78cfd001f9","observation_id":"c38c0be2-6288-4596-b66d-210cf48cc18a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.405336Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.410664Z","title":"Optimal SW AP gate insertion for nearest neighbor quantum circuits,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2014},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2502.08839","last_updated":"2025-03-04T19:34:57Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:28:31.393319Z","submitted_at":"2025-02-12T23:13:01Z","title":"Assessing Quantum Layout Synthesis Tools via Known Optimal-SWAP Cost Benchmarks","version":2},"reference_index":2,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.410664Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2502.08839"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e65fad7131d744c1c6138b1137e33a0d479f6bb5e7525748c8f6bfed368fceeb","observation_id":"139dd644-9282-49aa-8962-eabb743b3c81","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.410664Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.415178Z","title":"MUQUT: Multi-constraint quantum circuit mapping on NISQ comput- ers,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2019},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2502.08839","last_updated":"2025-03-04T19:34:57Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:28:31.393319Z","submitted_at":"2025-02-12T23:13:01Z","title":"Assessing Quantum Layout Synthesis Tools via Known Optimal-SWAP Cost Benchmarks","version":2},"reference_index":3,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.415178Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2502.08839"},"observation_digest":"sha256:cb09e52a4b7650c66474240f1d78fd9fa5e557c436e8e3d7dda225ab4b820819","observation_id":"a32875c2-fad6-4fc9-8f70-8c3a56f62b85","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.415178Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.419808Z","title":"Mapping quantum circuits to IBM QX architectures using the minimal number of SW AP and H operations,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2019},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2502.08839","last_updated":"2025-03-04T19:34:57Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:28:31.393319Z","submitted_at":"2025-02-12T23:13:01Z","title":"Assessing Quantum Layout Synthesis Tools via Known Optimal-SWAP Cost Benchmarks","version":2},"reference_index":4,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.419808Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2502.08839"},"observation_digest":"sha256:444f095bb56e31e5e447ef1e176c45a9a643450f77ac6652a252be35451c6c2e","observation_id":"df614ba1-6b9d-47b3-a9b1-87800f02a999","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.419808Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.424477Z","title":"Optimal layout synthesis for quantum computing,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2502.08839","last_updated":"2025-03-04T19:34:57Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:28:31.393319Z","submitted_at":"2025-02-12T23:13:01Z","title":"Assessing Quantum Layout Synthesis Tools via Known Optimal-SWAP Cost Benchmarks","version":2},"reference_index":5,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.424477Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2502.08839"},"observation_digest":"sha256:5fbf1d2df645f8136d0960b253dfca2125e95dfaf22f21b6de5875d572e29bea","observation_id":"e44ef3d1-8f3d-4144-ad2f-93a8fc5a510b","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.424477Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.428954Z","title":"Optimal qubit mapping with simultaneous gate absorption,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2502.08839","last_updated":"2025-03-04T19:34:57Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:28:31.393319Z","submitted_at":"2025-02-12T23:13:01Z","title":"Assessing Quantum Layout Synthesis Tools via Known Optimal-SWAP Cost Benchmarks","version":2},"reference_index":6,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.428954Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2502.08839"},"observation_digest":"sha256:096ee45a65b21622b2888d9dec13d29ae0575917d5df198874c64087703fdabe","observation_id":"45ed2c01-7718-494e-8cbd-4f75b2ec8cca","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.428954Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.434013Z","title":"Time-optimal Qubit mapping","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2502.08839","last_updated":"2025-03-04T19:34:57Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:28:31.393319Z","submitted_at":"2025-02-12T23:13:01Z","title":"Assessing Quantum Layout Synthesis Tools via Known Optimal-SWAP Cost Benchmarks","version":2},"reference_index":7,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.434013Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2502.08839"},"observation_digest":"sha256:ebd6f6ae228b0a48da32c42b34899e034e3853048312179db8ba57615eae6b58","observation_id":"d0c5dce1-aae7-46f1-8580-ba3254fdf1cf","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.434013Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.438477Z","title":"Qubit mapping and routing via MaxSAT,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2502.08839","last_updated":"2025-03-04T19:34:57Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:28:31.393319Z","submitted_at":"2025-02-12T23:13:01Z","title":"Assessing Quantum Layout Synthesis Tools via Known Optimal-SWAP Cost Benchmarks","version":2},"reference_index":8,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.438477Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2502.08839"},"observation_digest":"sha256:82290e5e3faf2a5ff4725682603d26e75f0c489e954e4abccbb2fb591d0eb4dd","observation_id":"148077aa-17aa-4604-b8fa-9a295dca4e37","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.438477Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.442399Z","title":"Optimal qubit assignment and routing via integer programming,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2502.08839","last_updated":"2025-03-04T19:34:57Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:28:31.393319Z","submitted_at":"2025-02-12T23:13:01Z","title":"Assessing Quantum Layout Synthesis Tools via Known Optimal-SWAP Cost Benchmarks","version":2},"reference_index":9,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.442399Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2502.08839"},"observation_digest":"sha256:44d3bb857f3c491c7152fd186bcea7eea77f4c6cd787f9ef7236aa555f8090e9","observation_id":"a491adf0-ab68-4e5b-a3ea-2684d0f4fa7c","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.442399Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.446222Z","title":"Scalable optimal layout synthesis for NISQ quantum processors,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2502.08839","last_updated":"2025-03-04T19:34:57Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:28:31.393319Z","submitted_at":"2025-02-12T23:13:01Z","title":"Assessing Quantum Layout Synthesis Tools via Known Optimal-SWAP Cost Benchmarks","version":2},"reference_index":10,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.446222Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2502.08839"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e783418ee6edf4cf77263ce2d1afdcdf15adeaad1829909e8d0fad27d8221946","observation_id":"6393ff2a-4a7f-4ad5-88e3-244e7f327a16","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.446222Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.450727Z","title":"Announcing Cirq: an open source framework for NISQ algorithms,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2502.08839","last_updated":"2025-03-04T19:34:57Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:28:31.393319Z","submitted_at":"2025-02-12T23:13:01Z","title":"Assessing Quantum Layout Synthesis Tools via Known Optimal-SWAP Cost Benchmarks","version":2},"reference_index":11,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.450727Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2502.08839"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a2b392c4f29d34c5866fd5f4db6e6e78892b83399347f35185c8bc4337b5a50e","observation_id":"a929a42f-6d72-4f67-95e6-d38ecef693de","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.450727Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.454697Z","title":"An efficient methodology for mapping quantum circuits to the IBM QX architectures,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2502.08839","last_updated":"2025-03-04T19:34:57Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:28:31.393319Z","submitted_at":"2025-02-12T23:13:01Z","title":"Assessing Quantum Layout Synthesis Tools via Known Optimal-SWAP Cost Benchmarks","version":2},"reference_index":12,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.454697Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2502.08839"},"observation_digest":"sha256:8fd25215a4f3acfef621db32308631a3c7f6881977b4bafa8c8ea828b2cf29f3","observation_id":"39de3de7-08fc-4bcc-8bda-2620139ab440","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.454697Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.459397Z","title":"(2018) Qiskit","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2502.08839","last_updated":"2025-03-04T19:34:57Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:28:31.393319Z","submitted_at":"2025-02-12T23:13:01Z","title":"Assessing Quantum Layout Synthesis Tools via Known Optimal-SWAP Cost Benchmarks","version":2},"reference_index":13,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.459397Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2502.08839"},"observation_digest":"sha256:3cb647ada8d61577bdb695f584aaac339421f7c4202dab391f878a4ed3e0506d","observation_id":"c6d0764a-9f81-442d-b014-3287cb98b24a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.459397Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.463219Z","title":"An Efficient Methodology for Mapping Quan- tum Circuits to the IBM QX Architectures,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2019},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2502.08839","last_updated":"2025-03-04T19:34:57Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:28:31.393319Z","submitted_at":"2025-02-12T23:13:01Z","title":"Assessing Quantum Layout Synthesis Tools via Known Optimal-SWAP Cost Benchmarks","version":2},"reference_index":14,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.463219Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2502.08839"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f10d86e3db3495f592f662f07357006c39220b5f40dfa670bb4cf37a7947cbb3","observation_id":"29856ba1-521a-4dcc-9bd7-9452846be77e","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.463219Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.467298Z","title":"Qubit allocation as a combination of subgraph isomorphism and token swapping,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2019},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2502.08839","last_updated":"2025-03-04T19:34:57Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:28:31.393319Z","submitted_at":"2025-02-12T23:13:01Z","title":"Assessing Quantum Layout Synthesis Tools via Known Optimal-SWAP Cost Benchmarks","version":2},"reference_index":15,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.467298Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2502.08839"},"observation_digest":"sha256:311c5d44b41f922f2ab13ea38918d00293959f3c362f7a49ac38ed005dbceaf1","observation_id":"61045105-14f3-41cb-bb90-e7845da8ca1f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.467298Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.470985Z","title":"Tackling the qubit mapping problem for NISQ-era quantum devices","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2019},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2502.08839","last_updated":"2025-03-04T19:34:57Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:28:31.393319Z","submitted_at":"2025-02-12T23:13:01Z","title":"Assessing Quantum Layout Synthesis Tools via Known Optimal-SWAP Cost Benchmarks","version":2},"reference_index":16,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.470985Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2502.08839"},"observation_digest":"sha256:3f0c582e5c8f2ee2846a24358ddd2036d20fca80884db1933af78719281a803f","observation_id":"bf2513f9-fdca-4159-b691-381e44b1a23a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.470985Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.474864Z","title":"Formal constraint-based compilation for noisy intermediate-scale quantum systems,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2019},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2502.08839","last_updated":"2025-03-04T19:34:57Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:28:31.393319Z","submitted_at":"2025-02-12T23:13:01Z","title":"Assessing Quantum Layout Synthesis Tools via Known Optimal-SWAP Cost Benchmarks","version":2},"reference_index":17,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.474864Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2502.08839"},"observation_digest":"sha256:4ce8283090204bc74e8abed76c146ebd256a663118f9207e1b432017d2cb7469","observation_id":"ebd6c981-25d6-4a76-a02a-842011d87e56","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.474864Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.478703Z","title":"t |ket⟩: a retargetable compiler for NISQ devices,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2502.08839","last_updated":"2025-03-04T19:34:57Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:28:31.393319Z","submitted_at":"2025-02-12T23:13:01Z","title":"Assessing Quantum Layout Synthesis Tools via Known Optimal-SWAP Cost Benchmarks","version":2},"reference_index":18,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.478703Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2502.08839"},"observation_digest":"sha256:49e6a6d0373bbc029a42c0cd43c3e2fd16ea67b731cc365c87a2b04cf21342ed","observation_id":"262e13ee-b32f-452d-a6b5-eb2e2eaff2d8","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.478703Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.482559Z","title":"Improved Mapping of Quantum Circuits to IBM QX Architectures,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2502.08839","last_updated":"2025-03-04T19:34:57Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:28:31.393319Z","submitted_at":"2025-02-12T23:13:01Z","title":"Assessing Quantum Layout Synthesis Tools via Known Optimal-SWAP Cost Benchmarks","version":2},"reference_index":19,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.482559Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2502.08839"},"observation_digest":"sha256:6ed1ff4d6ae2ab13bda311790e3786ce6d0fde3aa418131444b1cc62db1bbd12","observation_id":"95fc6b5e-39b2-46eb-8807-8d4ac2fe9fcf","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.482559Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.810547Z","title":"Not all SW APs have the same cost: a case for optimization- aware qubit routing,","venue":null,"work_id":"d2465f50-9af1-4851-983d-694e8e074f32","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2502.08839","last_updated":"2025-03-04T19:34:57Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:28:31.393319Z","submitted_at":"2025-02-12T23:13:01Z","title":"Assessing Quantum Layout Synthesis Tools via Known Optimal-SWAP Cost Benchmarks","version":2},"reference_index":20,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.486417Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2502.08839"},"observation_digest":"sha256:5d57527269fd1470a3ed5005bf4854d6446fb7c62a87998b59608382cd66e21d","observation_id":"94637461-ff86-4be5-8bef-ebe1ecde1d05","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.814910Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.490637Z","title":"A robust quantum layout synthesis algorithm with a qubit mapping checker,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2502.08839","last_updated":"2025-03-04T19:34:57Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:28:31.393319Z","submitted_at":"2025-02-12T23:13:01Z","title":"Assessing Quantum Layout Synthesis Tools via Known Optimal-SWAP Cost Benchmarks","version":2},"reference_index":21,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.490637Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2502.08839"},"observation_digest":"sha256:90246650b10c58a697f571ca23682006192f9e83ed36308443641a07879ebb5b","observation_id":"41885945-d58c-4405-9a88-54c92bd8944c","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.490637Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.494331Z","title":"Optimizing quantum circuit placement via machine learning,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2502.08839","last_updated":"2025-03-04T19:34:57Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:28:31.393319Z","submitted_at":"2025-02-12T23:13:01Z","title":"Assessing Quantum Layout Synthesis Tools via Known Optimal-SWAP Cost Benchmarks","version":2},"reference_index":22,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.494331Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2502.08839"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f48dadce02262c516d464568e0b739914dfe4d6248d288c780bd77b7320ed255","observation_id":"04d037ed-77f1-4425-a894-a23bc4075d21","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.494331Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.498062Z","title":"Reinforcement learning and dear framework for solving the qubit mapping problem,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2502.08839","last_updated":"2025-03-04T19:34:57Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:28:31.393319Z","submitted_at":"2025-02-12T23:13:01Z","title":"Assessing Quantum Layout Synthesis Tools via Known Optimal-SWAP Cost Benchmarks","version":2},"reference_index":23,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.498062Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2502.08839"},"observation_digest":"sha256:91d4c28a8ba1f2d0dcd30b331642580ecd05f58c94e8105f86f703ea927b8e75","observation_id":"4700762a-e7de-4de9-ac11-c4f77c56c453","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.498062Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.501880Z","title":"A fast and scalable qubit-mapping method for noisy intermediate-scale quantum computers,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2502.08839","last_updated":"2025-03-04T19:34:57Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:28:31.393319Z","submitted_at":"2025-02-12T23:13:01Z","title":"Assessing Quantum Layout Synthesis Tools via Known Optimal-SWAP Cost Benchmarks","version":2},"reference_index":24,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.501880Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2502.08839"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c44906fa47a1ce02f412057fd31137a9f92c4c0e3bdb81d14e4af1857c626511","observation_id":"0ab368e0-d27e-4c4d-8f0f-88b46aa80024","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.501880Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.505945Z","title":"CTQr: Control and timing-aware qubit routing,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2502.08839","last_updated":"2025-03-04T19:34:57Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:28:31.393319Z","submitted_at":"2025-02-12T23:13:01Z","title":"Assessing Quantum Layout Synthesis Tools via Known Optimal-SWAP Cost Benchmarks","version":2},"reference_index":25,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.505945Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2502.08839"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b5538e1425ad26eaf617ebe1d20cc604568906bb996378a83b3f8cd813ba53a8","observation_id":"db05ee26-0e8e-43a9-866d-6d63d55184f0","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.505945Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.509670Z","title":"Efficient qubit routing using a dynamically-extract-and-route framework,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2502.08839","last_updated":"2025-03-04T19:34:57Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:28:31.393319Z","submitted_at":"2025-02-12T23:13:01Z","title":"Assessing Quantum Layout Synthesis Tools via Known Optimal-SWAP Cost Benchmarks","version":2},"reference_index":26,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.509670Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2502.08839"},"observation_digest":"sha256:38b7eaca68409adedcf7f4ee6eae2b4d451fec8e2ef8de4bffad84e9b75a0419","observation_id":"a2a9b36f-9e5e-4303-9226-e58943625efe","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.509670Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2405.18371","last_updated":"2024-12-03T23:45:32Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T10:43:39.556923Z","submitted_at":"2024-05-28T17:10:20Z","title":"ML-QLS: Multilevel Quantum Layout Synthesis","version":3},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2405.18371","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.513509Z","title":"ML-QLS: Multilevel quantum layout synthe- sis,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2502.08839","last_updated":"2025-03-04T19:34:57Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:28:31.393319Z","submitted_at":"2025-02-12T23:13:01Z","title":"Assessing Quantum Layout Synthesis Tools via Known Optimal-SWAP Cost Benchmarks","version":2},"reference_index":27,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.513509Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2405.18371","citing_paper":"/paper/2502.08839"},"observation_digest":"sha256:17ac4916c2f7c0a0ae1e76678670ec30ec25da2e909f6b95e299a0fb871418de","observation_id":"998549b0-8ffa-4127-98ba-4ed4523fc49d","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.513509Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.518055Z","title":"Optimality study of existing quantum computing layout synthesis tools,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2502.08839","last_updated":"2025-03-04T19:34:57Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:28:31.393319Z","submitted_at":"2025-02-12T23:13:01Z","title":"Assessing Quantum Layout Synthesis Tools via Known Optimal-SWAP Cost Benchmarks","version":2},"reference_index":28,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.518055Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2502.08839"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c8888669c6ab9bdf6da9ee6215490c510fafb8c4437f4edded42e8a833379977","observation_id":"93087e50-ac5f-47bb-8203-7b9eec207bad","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.518055Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2301.08932","last_updated":"2024-12-20T20:30:16Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T02:43:22.952877Z","submitted_at":"2023-01-21T10:05:51Z","title":"Benchmarking Quantum Circuit Transformation with QKNOB Circuits","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2301.08932","doi":null,"metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"2301.08932","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.711628Z","title":"Benchmarking Quantum Circuit Transformation with QKNOB Circuits","venue":"quant-ph","work_id":"0cad16a2-0f56-4a9a-b869-72a8750c532a","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2502.08839","last_updated":"2025-03-04T19:34:57Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:28:31.393319Z","submitted_at":"2025-02-12T23:13:01Z","title":"Assessing Quantum Layout Synthesis Tools via Known Optimal-SWAP Cost Benchmarks","version":2},"reference_index":29,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.522031Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2301.08932","citing_paper":"/paper/2502.08839"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e59d87a0b87e902f42c1f04e54b1842590e7c59b1b412407e28512cd7a48d36b","observation_id":"61b09c08-ba00-4c53-a76c-c1659e674ace","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.718285Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.526560Z","title":"A (sub)graph isomorphism algorithm for matching large graphs,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2004},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2502.08839","last_updated":"2025-03-04T19:34:57Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:28:31.393319Z","submitted_at":"2025-02-12T23:13:01Z","title":"Assessing Quantum Layout Synthesis Tools via Known Optimal-SWAP Cost Benchmarks","version":2},"reference_index":30,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.526560Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2502.08839"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a7b6bdbb576fc3be67aa090ed7d42848a77d0fe40df21c4ac8a2f25a94761c60","observation_id":"3124bc39-78c6-4ff3-b441-e251f76122db","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.526560Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2409.08368","last_updated":"2024-09-12T19:19:59Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T05:50:31.378266Z","submitted_at":"2024-09-12T19:19:59Z","title":"LightSABRE: A Lightweight and Enhanced SABRE Algorithm","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2409.08368","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.530484Z","title":"LightSABRE: A lightweight and enhanced SABRE algorithm,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2502.08839","last_updated":"2025-03-04T19:34:57Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:28:31.393319Z","submitted_at":"2025-02-12T23:13:01Z","title":"Assessing Quantum Layout Synthesis Tools via Known Optimal-SWAP Cost Benchmarks","version":2},"reference_index":31,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.530484Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2409.08368","citing_paper":"/paper/2502.08839"},"observation_digest":"sha256:161ddba40d6dcebc94a7bd9eb833444f5b08e4fb51face6bbdbfbdd6390c4104","observation_id":"96063be2-a205-4c1d-8a23-19a58ffa7e07","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.530484Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1902.08091","last_updated":"2019-02-28T19:06:27Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:52:15.878454Z","submitted_at":"2019-02-21T15:09:20Z","title":"On the qubit routing problem","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"1902.08091","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.535013Z","title":"On the qubit routing problem,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":1902},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2502.08839","last_updated":"2025-03-04T19:34:57Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:28:31.393319Z","submitted_at":"2025-02-12T23:13:01Z","title":"Assessing Quantum Layout Synthesis Tools via Known Optimal-SWAP Cost Benchmarks","version":2},"reference_index":32,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.535013Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/1902.08091","citing_paper":"/paper/2502.08839"},"observation_digest":"sha256:53756c73edc045ce90e6a698c72219f83961b5dae75f0bbc43348388bb94a6e5","observation_id":"5dea2d21-0b59-49d7-85b5-5209571b5dc3","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.535013Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.539623Z","title":"MQT QMAP: Efficient quantum circuit mapping,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2502.08839","last_updated":"2025-03-04T19:34:57Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:28:31.393319Z","submitted_at":"2025-02-12T23:13:01Z","title":"Assessing Quantum Layout Synthesis Tools via Known Optimal-SWAP Cost Benchmarks","version":2},"reference_index":33,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.539623Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2502.08839"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e13dbd3a1549d0dbf797702852ae53452f2af1f4cd81ad299a916fe51d272624","observation_id":"75d538e5-0962-4dfa-837a-639df2d19ab4","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.539623Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}}],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2502.08839","last_updated":"2025-03-04T19:34:57Z","latest_version":2,"primary_category":"quant-ph","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:28:31.393319Z","submitted_at":"2025-02-12T23:13:01Z","title":"Assessing Quantum Layout Synthesis Tools via Known Optimal-SWAP Cost Benchmarks"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":33,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":31,"verified_exact":1,"verified_fuzzy":1},"total_outbound_references":33},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 8 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 33 of 33 outbound references and 2 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2502.08839."}