pith. sign in

arxiv: 2503.12263 · v2 · submitted 2025-03-15 · 🌀 gr-qc · astro-ph.CO· astro-ph.HE· astro-ph.IM· nucl-th

The Science of the Einstein Telescope

Adrian Abac , Raul Abramo , Simone Albanesi , Angelica Albertini , Alessandro Agapito , Michalis Agathos , Conrado Albertus , Nils Andersson
show 480 more authors
Tomas Andrade Igor Andreoni Federico Angeloni Marco Antonelli John Antoniadis Fabio Antonini Manuel Arca Sedda M. Celeste Artale Stefano Ascenzi Pierre Auclair Matteo Bachetti Charles Badger Biswajit Banerjee David Barba-Gonzalez Daniel Barta Nicola Bartolo Andreas Bauswein Andrea Begnoni Freija Beirnaert Michal Bejger Enis Belgacem Nicola Bellomo Laura Bernard Maria Grazia Bernardini Sebastiano Bernuzzi Christopher P. L. Berry Emanuele Berti Gianfranco Bertone Dario Bettoni Miguel Bezares Swetha Bhagwat Sofia Bisero Marie Anne Bizouard Jose J. Blanco-Pillado Simone Blasi Alice Bonino Alice Borghese Ssohrab Borhanian Elisa Bortolas Maria Teresa Botticella Marica Branchesi Matteo Breschi Richard Brito Enzo Brocato Floor S. Broekgaarden Tomasz Bulik Alessandra Buonanno Fiorella Burgio Adam Burrows Gianluca Calcagni Sofia Canevarolo Enrico Cappellaro Giulia Capurri Carmelita Carbone Roberto Casadio Ramiro Cayuso Pablo Cerda-Duran Prasanta Char Sylvain Chaty Tommaso Chiarusi Martyna Chruslinska Francesco Cireddu Philippa Cole Alberto Colombo Monica Colpi Geoffrey Compere Carlo Contaldi Maxence Corman Francesco Crescimbeni Sergio Cristallo Elena Cuoco Giulia Cusin Tito Dal Canton Gergely Dalya Paolo D'Avanzo Nazanin Davari Valerio De Luca Viola De Renzis Massimo Della Valle Walter Del Pozzo Federico De Santi Alessio Ludovico De Santis Tim Dietrich Ema Dimastrogiovanni Guillem Domenech Daniela Doneva Marco Drago Ulyana Dupletsa Hannah Duval Irina Dvorkin Nancy Elias-Rosa Stephen Fairhurst Anthea F. Fantina Matteo Fasiello Maxime Fays Rob Fender Tobias Fischer Francois Foucart Tassos Fragos Stefano Foffa Gabriele Franciolini Jacopo Fumagalli Jonathan Gair Rossella Gamba Juan Garcia-Bellido Cecilio Garcia-Quiros Laszlo Arpad Gergely Giancarlo Ghirlanda Archisman Ghosh Bruno Giacomazzo Fabian Gittins Ines Francesca Giudice Boris Goncharov Alejandra Gonzalez Stephane Goriely Luca Graziani Giuseppe Greco Leonardo Gualtieri Gianluca Maria Guidi Ish Gupta Maria Haney Mark Hannam Jan Harms Arus Harutyunyan Brynmor Haskell Andreas Haungs Nandini Hazra Gary Hemming Ik Siong Heng Tanja Hinderer Alexander van der Horst Qian Hu Sascha Husa Francesco Iacovelli Giulia Illuminati Gianluca Inguglia David Izquierdo Villalba Justin Janquart Kamiel Janssens Alexander C. Jenkins Ian Jones Balazs Kacskovics Ralf S. Klessen Kostas Kokkotas Hao-Jui Kuan Sumit Kumar Sachiko Kuroyanagi Danny Laghi Astrid Lamberts Gaetano Lambiase Francois Larrouturou Paola Leaci Michele Lenzi Andrew Levan T. G. F. Li Yufeng Li Dicong Liang Marco Limongi Boyuan Liu Felipe J. Llanes-Estrada Eleonora Loffredo Oliver Long Eva Lope-Oter Georgios Lukes-Gerakopoulos Elisa Maggio Michele Maggiore Michele Mancarella Michela Mapelli Pablo Marchant Annarita Margiotta Alberto Mariotti Alisha Marriott-Best Sylvain Marsat Gabriel Martinez-Pinedo Andrea Maselli Simone Mastrogiovanni Isabela Matos Andrea Melandri Raissa F. P. Mendes Josiel Mendonca Soares de Souza Giorgio Mentasti Mar Mezcua Philipp Mosta Chiranjib Mondal Michele Moresco Tista Mukherjee Niccolo Muttoni Alessandro Nagar Harsh Narola Lara Nava Pablo Navarro Moreno Gijs Nelemans Alex B. Nielsen Samaya Nissanke Martin Obergaulinger Micaela Oertel Gor Oganesyan Francesca Onori Costantino Pacilio Giulia Pagliaroli Cristiano Palomba Peter T. H. Pang Paolo Pani Lucia Papalini Barbara Patricelli Alessandro Patruno Alessandro Pedrotti Albino Perego Maria Angeles Perez-Garcia Carole Perigois Gabriele Perna Celine Peroux J. Perret Delphine Perrodin Alessandro Pesci Harald P. Pfeiffer Ornella Juliana Piccinni Mauro Pieroni Silvia Piranomonte Lorenzo Pompili E. K. Porter Rafael A. Porto Adam Pound Jade Powell Mathieu Puech Geraint Pratten Anna Puecher Oriol Pujolas Miguel Quartin Adriana R. Raduta Antoni Ramos-Buades Aaron Rase Massimiliano Razzano Nanda Rea Tania Regimbau Arianna Renzini Piero Rettegno Angelo Ricciardone Antonio Riotto Alba Romero-Rodriguez Samuele Ronchini Dorota Rosinska Andrea Rossi Soumen Roy Diego Rubiera-Garcia J. Rubio Pilar Ruiz-Lapuente Violetta Sagun Mairi Sakellariadou Om Sharan Salafia Anuradha Samajdar Nicolas Sanchis-Gual Andrea Sanna Filippo Santoliquido Bangalore Sathyaprakash Patricia Schmidt Stefano Schmidt Fabian R. N. Schneider Raffaella Schneider Armen Sedrakian Geraldine Servant Alexander Sevrin Lijing Shao Hector O. Silva Peera Simakachorn Stephen Smartt Thomas P. Sotiriou Mario Spera Antonio Stamerra Daniele A. Steer Jan Steinhoff Nikolaos Stergioulas Riccardo Sturani Duvier Suarez Jishnu Suresh Shaun Swain Matteo Tagliazucchi Nicola Tamanini Gianmassimo Tasinato Thomas M. Tauris Jacopo Tissino Giovanni Maria Tomaselli Silvia Toonen Alejandro Torres-Forne Cezary Turski Cristiano Ugolini Elias C. Vagenas Lorenzo Valbusa Dall'Armi Elena Valenti Rosa Valiante Chris Van Den Broeck Maarten van de Meent Lieke A. C. van Son Miguel Vanvlasselaer Massimo Vaglio Vijay Varma John Veitch Ville Vaskonen Susanna D. Vergani Milan Wils Helvi Witek Isaac C. F. Wong Stoytcho Yazadjiev Garvin Yim Fausto Acernese Hojae Ahn Annalisa Allocca Alex Amato Marc Andres-Carcasona Guerino Avallone Markus Bachlechner Patrick Baer Stefano Bagnasco Gabriele Balbi Fabrizio Barone Eugenio Benedetti Charlotte Benning Simone Bini Jose Luis Blazquez Salcedo Valerio Bozza Matteo Bruno Timo Butz Matteo Califano Enrico Calloni Giovanni Carapella Alessandro Cardini Shreevathsa Chalathadka Subrahmanya Francesco Chiadini Antonino Chiummo Spina Cianetti Giacomo Ciani Eugenio Coccia Andrea Contu Robin Cornelissen Andrea Cozzumbo Lewis Croney Mariateresa Crosta Rocco D'Agostino Stefan Danilishin Sabrina D'Antonio Jorden De Bolle Jerome Degallaix Mariafelicia De Laurentis Riccardo della Monica Francesco De Marco Ivan de Martino Rosario De Rosa Riccardo De Salvo Roberta De Simone Christophe Detavernier Giovanni Diaferia Martina Di Cesare Luciano Di Fiore Matteo Di Giovanni Sibilla Di Pace Jennifer Docherty Domenico D'Urso Oussama El Mecherfi Luciano Errico Federica Fabrizi Viviana Fafone Viviana Fanti Rosalba Fittipaldi Vincenzo Fiumara Andreas Freise Stefan Funk Mika Gaedtke Fabio Garufi Oliver Gerberding Edoardo Giangrandi Carlo Giunchi Victoria Graham Massimo Granata Veronica Granata Anna Green Karen Haughian Lavinia Heisenberg Margot Hennig Stefan Hild Van Long Hoang Nathan Holland Gerardo Iannone Katharina-Sophie Isleif Robert Joppe Chang-Hee Kim Chunglee Kim Kyungmin Kim Erika Korb Mikhail Korobko Luise Kranzhoff Tim Kuhlbusch Gregoire Lacaille Angelique Lartaux-Vollard Lia Lavezzi Paul Laycock Sumi Lee Sumin Lee Sungho Lee Giovanni Losurdo Leonardo Lucchesi Harald Luck Adrian Macquet Ettore Majorana Valentina Mangano Filippo Martelli Iain Martin Mario Martinez Alberto Masoni Luca Massaro Daniele Melini Amata Mercurio Lorenzo Mereni Andrew L. Miller Lorenzo Mirasola Alexandra Mitchell Irene Molinari Matteo Montani Conor Mow-Lowry Riccardo Murgia Peter Gordon Murray Giuseppe Muscas Luca Naticchioni Ardiana Nela Marina Nery Tom Niggemann Niklas Nippe Jerome Novak Armin Numic Marco Olivieri Marco Orsini June Gyu Park Daniela Pascucci Antonio Perreca Francesco Piergiovanni Vincenzo Pierro Laurent Pinard Innocenzo Pinto Michele Punturo Paola Puppo Francesco Quochi Reinhardt Omondi Rading Piero Rapagnani Marco Ricci Davi Rodrigues Rocco Romano Davide Rozza Pooya Saffarieh Federica Santucci Steven Schramm Benjamin Schwab Valeria Sequino Liam Shelling Neto Laura Silenzi Alicia M. Sintes Carlos F. Sopuerta Andrew Spencer Achim Stahl Jessica Steinlechner Sebastian Steinlechner Robert Szabo Thomas Thummler Emanuele Tofani Stefano Torniamenti Riccardo Travaglini Lucia Trozzo M. Paola Vaccaro Michele Valentini Peter Van Jesse van Dongen Joris van Heijningen Zeb van Ranst Marco Vardaro Patrice Verdier Daniele Vernieri Nico Wagner Janis Woehler Joachim Wolf Guido Zavattini Adrian Zink Andreas Zmija
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 23:53 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc astro-ph.COastro-ph.HEastro-ph.IMnucl-th
keywords Einstein Telescopegravitational wavesthird-generation detectorscosmologymulti-messenger astronomyfundamental physicscompact objectsstellar collapse
0
0 comments X

The pith

Einstein Telescope will deliver major advances in fundamental physics, cosmology, and compact-object astrophysics via third-generation gravitational-wave detections.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents state-of-the-art forecasts for the scientific reach of the Einstein Telescope in its two proposed layouts, a single triangular site or two L-shaped detectors. It maps expected performance onto impacts across fundamental physics, cosmology, the early Universe, compact-object astrophysics, extreme-matter physics, and stellar-collapse dynamics, while also addressing multi-messenger synergies and data-analysis demands. A sympathetic reader would care because these forecasts indicate that ET could open observational windows on source populations and physical regimes that remain inaccessible to current instruments.

Core claim

The Einstein Telescope, in either the triangular single-site or dual L-shaped configuration, will access large populations of gravitational-wave sources with unprecedented precision, thereby producing significant advances in fundamental physics, cosmology, early-Universe studies, astrophysics of compact objects, physics of matter at extreme conditions, and dynamics of stellar collapse, with multi-messenger observations further strengthening constraints on extreme astrophysical events.

What carries the argument

The central object is the set of sensitivity forecasts and waveform models used to quantify the science reach of the two ET detector geometries, enabling direct comparison of their performance on source detection, parameter estimation, and multi-band synergies.

If this is right

  • Multi-messenger observations will tighten constraints on the physics of extreme astrophysical events.
  • Multi-band observations with ground- and space-based detectors will improve parameter estimation for individual sources.
  • Complementary frequency-band data will supply independent information on astrophysical and cosmological mechanisms.
  • Dedicated waveform modeling advances will be required to extract the full science return from third-generation detectors.
  • Data-analysis pipelines must handle large source populations while delivering high-precision measurements.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the assumed sensitivities are realized, ET data could place new limits on early-Universe phase transitions or inflationary models through stochastic backgrounds.
  • Joint analysis of ET events with LISA observations could yield complete evolutionary tracks for stellar-mass binaries across frequency bands.
  • Unexpected deviations in observed merger rates from the forecasts would require revisions to current stellar-evolution or binary-formation models.
  • The scale of the data-analysis challenge may drive development of new statistical or machine-learning methods applicable to other large astronomical surveys.

Load-bearing premise

The predictions assume specific noise curves, sensitivities, and waveform models for the two proposed detector configurations that accurately represent real-world performance and source physics.

What would settle it

Direct comparison of the actual number and parameter-estimation precision of detected sources in the first years of ET operation against the quantitative forecasts given for each science target would confirm or refute the central claims.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2503.12263 by Aaron Rase, Achim Stahl, Adam Burrows, Adam Pound, Adrian Abac, Adriana R. Raduta, Adrian Macquet, Adrian Zink, Alba Romero-Rodriguez, Alberto Colombo, Alberto Mariotti, Alberto Masoni, Albino Perego, Alejandra Gonzalez, Alejandro Torres-Forne, Alessandra Buonanno, Alessandro Agapito, Alessandro Cardini, Alessandro Nagar, Alessandro Patruno, Alessandro Pedrotti, Alessandro Pesci, Alessio Ludovico De Santis, Alex Amato, Alexander C. Jenkins, Alexander Sevrin, Alexander van der Horst, Alexandra Mitchell, Alex B. Nielsen, Alice Bonino, Alice Borghese, Alicia M. Sintes, Alisha Marriott-Best, Amata Mercurio, Andrea Begnoni, Andrea Contu, Andrea Cozzumbo, Andrea Maselli, Andrea Melandri, Andrea Rossi, Andrea Sanna, Andreas Bauswein, Andreas Freise, Andreas Haungs, Andreas Zmija, Andrew Levan, Andrew L. Miller, Andrew Spencer, Angelica Albertini, Angelique Lartaux-Vollard, Angelo Ricciardone, Anna Green, Annalisa Allocca, Anna Puecher, Annarita Margiotta, Anthea F. Fantina, Antonino Chiummo, Antonio Perreca, Antonio Riotto, Antonio Stamerra, Antoni Ramos-Buades, Anuradha Samajdar, Archisman Ghosh, Ardiana Nela, Arianna Renzini, Armen Sedrakian, Armin Numic, Arus Harutyunyan, Astrid Lamberts, Balazs Kacskovics, Bangalore Sathyaprakash, Barbara Patricelli, Benjamin Schwab, Biswajit Banerjee, Boris Goncharov, Boyuan Liu, Bruno Giacomazzo, Brynmor Haskell, Carlo Contaldi, Carlo Giunchi, Carlos F. Sopuerta, Carmelita Carbone, Carole Perigois, Cecilio Garcia-Quiros, Celine Peroux, Cezary Turski, Chang-Hee Kim, Charles Badger, Charlotte Benning, Chiranjib Mondal, Christophe Detavernier, Christopher P. L. Berry, Chris Van Den Broeck, Chunglee Kim, Conor Mow-Lowry, Conrado Albertus, Costantino Pacilio, Cristiano Palomba, Cristiano Ugolini, Daniela Doneva, Daniela Pascucci, Daniel Barta, Daniele A. Steer, Daniele Melini, Daniele Vernieri, Danny Laghi, Dario Bettoni, David Barba-Gonzalez, Davide Rozza, David Izquierdo Villalba, Davi Rodrigues, Delphine Perrodin, Dicong Liang, Diego Rubiera-Garcia, Domenico D'Urso, Dorota Rosinska, Duvier Suarez, Edoardo Giangrandi, E. K. Porter, Elena Cuoco, Elena Valenti, Eleonora Loffredo, Elias C. Vagenas, Elisa Bortolas, Elisa Maggio, Ema Dimastrogiovanni, Emanuele Berti, Emanuele Tofani, Enis Belgacem, Enrico Calloni, Enrico Cappellaro, Enzo Brocato, Erika Korb, Ettore Majorana, Eugenio Benedetti, Eugenio Coccia, Eva Lope-Oter, Fabian Gittins, Fabian R. N. Schneider, Fabio Antonini, Fabio Garufi, Fabrizio Barone, Fausto Acernese, Federica Fabrizi, Federica Santucci, Federico Angeloni, Federico De Santi, Felipe J. Llanes-Estrada, Filippo Martelli, Filippo Santoliquido, Fiorella Burgio, Floor S. Broekgaarden, Francesca Onori, Francesco Chiadini, Francesco Cireddu, Francesco Crescimbeni, Francesco De Marco, Francesco Iacovelli, Francesco Piergiovanni, Francesco Quochi, Francois Foucart, Francois Larrouturou, Freija Beirnaert, Gabriele Balbi, Gabriele Franciolini, Gabriele Perna, Gabriel Martinez-Pinedo, Gaetano Lambiase, Garvin Yim, Gary Hemming, Geoffrey Compere, Georgios Lukes-Gerakopoulos, Geraint Pratten, Geraldine Servant, Gerardo Iannone, Gergely Dalya, Giacomo Ciani, Giancarlo Ghirlanda, Gianfranco Bertone, Gianluca Calcagni, Gianluca Inguglia, Gianluca Maria Guidi, Gianmassimo Tasinato, Gijs Nelemans, Giorgio Mentasti, Giovanni Carapella, Giovanni Diaferia, Giovanni Losurdo, Giovanni Maria Tomaselli, Giulia Capurri, Giulia Cusin, Giulia Illuminati, Giulia Pagliaroli, Giuseppe Greco, Giuseppe Muscas, Gor Oganesyan, Gregoire Lacaille, Guerino Avallone, Guido Zavattini, Guillem Domenech, Hannah Duval, Hao-Jui Kuan, Harald Luck, Harald P. Pfeiffer, Harsh Narola, Hector O. Silva, Helvi Witek, Hojae Ahn, Iain Martin, Ian Jones, Igor Andreoni, Ik Siong Heng, Ines Francesca Giudice, Innocenzo Pinto, Irene Molinari, Irina Dvorkin, Isaac C. F. Wong, Isabela Matos, Ish Gupta, Ivan de Martino, Jacopo Fumagalli, Jacopo Tissino, Jade Powell, Jan Harms, Janis Woehler, Jan Steinhoff, Jennifer Docherty, Jerome Degallaix, Jerome Novak, Jesse van Dongen, Jessica Steinlechner, Jishnu Suresh, Joachim Wolf, John Antoniadis, John Veitch, Jonathan Gair, Jorden De Bolle, Joris van Heijningen, Jose J. Blanco-Pillado, Jose Luis Blazquez Salcedo, Josiel Mendonca Soares de Souza, J. Perret, J. Rubio, Juan Garcia-Bellido, June Gyu Park, Justin Janquart, Kamiel Janssens, Karen Haughian, Katharina-Sophie Isleif, Kostas Kokkotas, Kyungmin Kim, Lara Nava, Laszlo Arpad Gergely, Laura Bernard, Laura Silenzi, Laurent Pinard, Lavinia Heisenberg, Leonardo Gualtieri, Leonardo Lucchesi, Lewis Croney, Lia Lavezzi, Liam Shelling Neto, Lieke A. C. van Son, Lijing Shao, Lorenzo Mereni, Lorenzo Mirasola, Lorenzo Pompili, Lorenzo Valbusa Dall'Armi, Luca Graziani, Luca Massaro, Luca Naticchioni, Luciano Di Fiore, Luciano Errico, Lucia Papalini, Lucia Trozzo, Luise Kranzhoff, Maarten van de Meent, Mairi Sakellariadou, Manuel Arca Sedda, Marc Andres-Carcasona, Marco Antonelli, Marco Drago, Marco Limongi, Marco Olivieri, Marco Orsini, Marco Ricci, Marco Vardaro, Margot Hennig, Maria Angeles Perez-Garcia, Mariafelicia De Laurentis, Maria Grazia Bernardini, Maria Haney, Maria Teresa Botticella, Mariateresa Crosta, Marica Branchesi, Marie Anne Bizouard, Marina Nery, Mario Martinez, Mario Spera, Mark Hannam, Markus Bachlechner, Mar Mezcua, Martina Di Cesare, Martin Obergaulinger, Martyna Chruslinska, Massimiliano Razzano, Massimo Della Valle, Massimo Granata, Massimo Vaglio, Mathieu Puech, Matteo Bachetti, Matteo Breschi, Matteo Bruno, Matteo Califano, Matteo Di Giovanni, Matteo Fasiello, Matteo Montani, Matteo Tagliazucchi, Mauro Pieroni, Maxence Corman, Maxime Fays, M. Celeste Artale, Micaela Oertel, Michal Bejger, Michalis Agathos, Michela Mapelli, Michele Lenzi, Michele Maggiore, Michele Mancarella, Michele Moresco, Michele Punturo, Michele Valentini, Miguel Bezares, Miguel Quartin, Miguel Vanvlasselaer, Mika Gaedtke, Mikhail Korobko, Milan Wils, Monica Colpi, M. Paola Vaccaro, Nancy Elias-Rosa, Nanda Rea, Nandini Hazra, Nathan Holland, Nazanin Davari, Niccolo Muttoni, Nicola Bartolo, Nicola Bellomo, Nicolas Sanchis-Gual, Nicola Tamanini, Nico Wagner, Niklas Nippe, Nikolaos Stergioulas, Nils Andersson, Oliver Gerberding, Oliver Long, Om Sharan Salafia, Oriol Pujolas, Ornella Juliana Piccinni, Oussama El Mecherfi, Pablo Cerda-Duran, Pablo Marchant, Pablo Navarro Moreno, Paola Leaci, Paola Puppo, Paolo D'Avanzo, Paolo Pani, Patrice Verdier, Patricia Schmidt, Patrick Baer, Paul Laycock, Peera Simakachorn, Peter Gordon Murray, Peter T. H. Pang, Peter Van, Philippa Cole, Philipp Mosta, Piero Rapagnani, Piero Rettegno, Pierre Auclair, Pilar Ruiz-Lapuente, Pooya Saffarieh, Prasanta Char, Qian Hu, Rafael A. Porto, Raffaella Schneider, Raissa F. P. Mendes, Ralf S. Klessen, Ramiro Cayuso, Raul Abramo, Reinhardt Omondi Rading, Riccardo della Monica, Riccardo De Salvo, Riccardo Murgia, Riccardo Sturani, Riccardo Travaglini, Richard Brito, Roberta De Simone, Robert Joppe, Roberto Casadio, Robert Szabo, Rob Fender, Robin Cornelissen, Rocco D'Agostino, Rocco Romano, Rosalba Fittipaldi, Rosario De Rosa, Rosa Valiante, Rossella Gamba, Sabrina D'Antonio, Sachiko Kuroyanagi, Samaya Nissanke, Samuele Ronchini, Sascha Husa, Sebastiano Bernuzzi, Sebastian Steinlechner, Sergio Cristallo, Shaun Swain, Shreevathsa Chalathadka Subrahmanya, Sibilla Di Pace, Silvia Piranomonte, Silvia Toonen, Simone Albanesi, Simone Bini, Simone Blasi, Simone Mastrogiovanni, Sofia Bisero, Sofia Canevarolo, Soumen Roy, Spina Cianetti, Ssohrab Borhanian, Stefan Danilishin, Stefan Funk, Stefan Hild, Stefano Ascenzi, Stefano Bagnasco, Stefano Foffa, Stefano Schmidt, Stefano Torniamenti, Stephane Goriely, Stephen Fairhurst, Stephen Smartt, Steven Schramm, Stoytcho Yazadjiev, Sumi Lee, Sumin Lee, Sumit Kumar, Sungho Lee, Susanna D. Vergani, Swetha Bhagwat, Sylvain Chaty, Sylvain Marsat, Tania Regimbau, Tanja Hinderer, Tassos Fragos, T. G. F. Li, Thomas M. Tauris, Thomas P. Sotiriou, Thomas Thummler, Tim Dietrich, Tim Kuhlbusch, Timo Butz, Tista Mukherjee, Tito Dal Canton, Tobias Fischer, Tomas Andrade, Tomasz Bulik, Tommaso Chiarusi, Tom Niggemann, Ulyana Dupletsa, Valentina Mangano, Valeria Sequino, Valerio Bozza, Valerio De Luca, Van Long Hoang, Veronica Granata, Victoria Graham, Vijay Varma, Ville Vaskonen, Vincenzo Fiumara, Vincenzo Pierro, Viola De Renzis, Violetta Sagun, Viviana Fafone, Viviana Fanti, Walter Del Pozzo, Yufeng Li, Zeb van Ranst.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p035_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p037_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p039_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p040_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p041_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p042_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p043_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p044_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p046_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p047_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p049_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p051_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p052_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p054_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p065_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p068_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p071_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p073_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p075_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p076_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p078_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p080_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p081_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p082_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p083_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p086_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p090_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p091_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p095_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p097_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p099_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p103_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p104_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p105_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p107_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p110_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p114_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p115_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p116_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p119_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p123_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p125_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p126_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p127_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p130_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p134_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p135_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p137_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p141_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p146_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p149_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p154_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p159_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p169_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p177_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p183_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p184_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p188_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p189_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p191_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p193_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p195_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p197_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p199_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p201_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p204_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p207_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p209_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p211_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p213_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p215_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p216_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p217_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p228_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p229_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p230_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p238_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p239_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p245_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p246_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p247_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p249_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p250_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p251_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p252_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p253_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p256_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p258_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p260_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p261_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p262_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p269_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p272_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p273_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p274_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p275_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p276_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p280_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p282_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p283_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p289_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Comparison between the mass function predicted by ￾￾￾ and the results of numerical simulations (upper panel, I = 4) and semi-analytical models (lower panel, I = 5). As in Fig.4, the data points show the binned distribution obtained by ￾￾￾ reference model for light (magenta) and heavy (red, orange) BH descendants, with the red dashed line representing the best-fit of the distribution of heavy seed descenda… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p295_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p297_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p300_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p302_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p309_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p312_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p316_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p331_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p333_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p334_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p338_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p341_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p342_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p344_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p346_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p348_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p349_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p350_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p351_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p353_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p355_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p359_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p365_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p367_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p368_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p370_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p371_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p372_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p378_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p380_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p381_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p385_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p388_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p390_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p391_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p392_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p396_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p398_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p403_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p404_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p409_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p410_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p418_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p419_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p424_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p428_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p429_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p430_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p444_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p448_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p468_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p473_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p476_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p480_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p481_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p484_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p485_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p501_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p502_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p508_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p510_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p514_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p515_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p516_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p517_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p518_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p519_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p520_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p521_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p524_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p525_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p526_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p527_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p528_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p532_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p536_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p542_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p544_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p549_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p552_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p563_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p566_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p567_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p572_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p577_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p579_10.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Einstein Telescope (ET) is the European project for a gravitational-wave (GW) observatory of third-generation. In this paper we present a comprehensive discussion of its science objectives, providing state-of-the-art predictions for the capabilities of ET in both geometries currently under consideration, a single-site triangular configuration or two L-shaped detectors. We discuss the impact that ET will have on domains as broad and diverse as fundamental physics, cosmology, early Universe, astrophysics of compact objects, physics of matter in extreme conditions, and dynamics of stellar collapse. We discuss how the study of extreme astrophysical events will be enhanced by multi-messenger observations. We highlight the ET synergies with ground-based and space-borne GW observatories, including multi-band investigations of the same sources, improved parameter estimation, and complementary information on astrophysical or cosmological mechanisms obtained combining observations from different frequency bands. We present advancements in waveform modeling dedicated to third-generation observatories, along with open tools developed within the ET Collaboration for assessing the scientific potentials of different detector configurations. We finally discuss the data analysis challenges posed by third-generation observatories, which will enable access to large populations of sources and provide unprecedented precision.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a comprehensive review of the science objectives for the Einstein Telescope (ET), a proposed third-generation gravitational-wave observatory. It presents state-of-the-art predictions for the capabilities of two detector geometries (single-site triangular or two L-shaped detectors) and their projected impacts across fundamental physics, cosmology, the early Universe, compact-object astrophysics, extreme matter physics, and stellar collapse dynamics. The review also addresses multi-messenger synergies, waveform modeling advances, open tools developed by the ET Collaboration for configuration assessment, and data-analysis challenges for large source populations.

Significance. If the underlying modeling assumptions hold, the review would provide a valuable consolidation of ET science cases, drawing on prior literature to forecast broad impacts and highlighting synergies with other GW observatories. A clear strength is the development and mention of open tools for evaluating detector configurations, which supports community assessment of design choices. The forward-looking nature of the claims is explicitly conditional on assumed noise curves, sensitivities, and waveform models, consistent with the scope of a science-case review.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract and detector configurations section] Abstract and the section on detector configurations: the central claims of significant impact across multiple domains rest on specific (but externally supplied) noise curves, sensitivities, and waveform models for the two geometries. The manuscript does not include a quantitative discussion of how variations or uncertainties in these inputs propagate to the predicted event rates or parameter precisions, which is load-bearing for the robustness of the forecasts.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that predictions are 'state-of-the-art' without naming the specific external waveform models or noise curves used; adding one or two explicit references here would improve traceability.
  2. Tables or figures comparing the triangular versus dual L-shaped configurations would benefit from an additional column or caption explicitly listing the noise curve and waveform assumptions adopted for each prediction.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript, their positive overall assessment, and the recommendation for minor revision. We address the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract and detector configurations section] Abstract and the section on detector configurations: the central claims of significant impact across multiple domains rest on specific (but externally supplied) noise curves, sensitivities, and waveform models for the two geometries. The manuscript does not include a quantitative discussion of how variations or uncertainties in these inputs propagate to the predicted event rates or parameter precisions, which is load-bearing for the robustness of the forecasts.

    Authors: We agree that the forecasts rest on specific adopted inputs and that an explicit quantitative propagation of uncertainties would strengthen the presentation of robustness. As a review consolidating results from many independent studies in the literature, each with its own modeling choices, a comprehensive new sensitivity analysis across all science domains lies outside the scope of this work. The conditional nature of the predictions on the assumed noise curves, sensitivities, and waveform models is already stated in the text. In the revised manuscript we will add a concise paragraph in the detector configurations section that identifies the dominant sources of input uncertainty and qualitatively indicates their likely effect on key quantities such as event rates and parameter precisions. We will also highlight more prominently the open tools developed by the ET Collaboration, which are intended to allow users to perform precisely the quantitative variation studies the referee requests. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity identified

full rationale

This is a review paper presenting forward-looking science-case forecasts for the Einstein Telescope based on externally assumed noise curves, sensitivities, waveform models, and prior literature. No load-bearing derivations, parameter fits, or self-definitional steps are described that reduce the central claims to the paper's own inputs by construction. The argument is explicitly conditional on those inputs, with any internal tools or citations serving as supporting references rather than circular foundations.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on assumed detector performance parameters and standard models from prior literature; no new entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • ET noise curves and sensitivities
    Key inputs for all capability predictions; values are taken from design studies rather than derived here.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Current waveform models and source population assumptions remain valid at ET sensitivities.
    Invoked throughout the discussion of science reach and multi-messenger synergies.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 8133 in / 1230 out tokens · 34732 ms · 2026-05-22T23:53:07.963512+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 60 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Wave-optics gravitational wave lensing in modified gravity

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    In a curvature-coupled propagation framework for modified gravity, gravitational-wave lensing in wave optics shows persistent infrared interactions that prevent the amplification factor from approaching unity at zero ...

  2. Nonlocal-in-time tail effects in gravitational scattering to fifth Post-Minkowskian and tenth self-force orders

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    Nonlocal-in-time conservative tail contributions to gravitational scattering are derived at 5PM and 10SF orders, expressed via polylogarithms up to weight three and agreeing with prior results through 6PN.

  3. Contrastive self-supervised convolutional autoencoder for core-collapse supernova gravitational-wave detection

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A contrastive self-supervised convolutional autoencoder detects core-collapse supernova gravitational waves with performance comparable to supervised CNNs, better generalization to unseen waveforms, and ~120 kpc sensi...

  4. Primary gravitational waves at high frequencies II: Emergence of the exponential cut-off in the power spectrum

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 conditional novelty 7.0

    For infinitely differentiable effective potentials describing the post-inflation transition, the regularized power spectrum of primary gravitational waves exhibits exponential suppression at small scales.

  5. Tracing Primordial Gravitational Waves via non-Gaussian Signatures of Halo Bias

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Tensor-induced non-Gaussianity from primordial gravitational waves generates a unique scale-dependent halo bias correction that can reach order-one amplitude for rare high-redshift halos at z=7.

  6. Gravitational-Bumblebee perturbations: Exact decoupling and isospectrality

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Bumblebee gravity perturbations decouple exactly into gravitational and vector sectors, with gravitational modes dynamically immune to Lorentz violation and odd-even parities strictly isospectral.

  7. Axial tidal Love numbers of black holes in matter environments

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Axial tidal Love numbers for black holes in anisotropic fluid environments are derived analytically and numerically, with non-compact support density profiles producing logarithmic terms that obstruct standard tidal m...

  8. Large-Eccentricity Asymptotics and Fast Analytic Approximation for Fourier modes of Post-Newtonian Eccentric Waveforms

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Derives large-eccentricity asymptotics for post-Newtonian eccentric waveform Fourier modes and builds a fast endpoint-constrained analytic approximation with error under 10^{-3} valid to p=200.

  9. Axial Oscillations of Viscous Neutron Stars

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Viscous neutron stars have new families of axial oscillation modes without perfect-fluid counterparts, featuring mode avoidance and long-lived modes.

  10. Novel ringdown tests of general relativity with black hole greybody factors

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    GreyRing model based on greybody factors reproduces numerical relativity ringdown signals with mismatches of order 10^{-6} and enables a new post-merger consistency test of general relativity applied to GW250114.

  11. Squashed Pyramid Interferometer Network (SPIN): Direct Access to Chirality of Cosmological Gravitational Waves

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Pyramid interferometers use non-coplanar geometry to create a channel sensitive only to net helicity in the cosmological gravitational wave background while remaining blind to the unpolarized component.

  12. Squashed Pyramid Interferometer Network (SPIN): Direct Access to Chirality of Cosmological Gravitational Waves

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    The Squashed Pyramid Interferometer Network uses a non-coplanar configuration to directly access the chirality of cosmological gravitational waves.

  13. Gravitational wave signal and noise response of an optically levitated sensor in a Fabry-P\'erot cavity

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A general relativistic derivation of gravitational wave response in an optically levitated cavity sensor reveals position-dependent strain sensitivity and suppressed input-mirror noise coupling.

  14. Cordierite-based optical resonators with extremely low thermal expansion

    physics.optics 2026-03 conditional novelty 7.0

    Cordierite-based resonators with ULE mirrors reach effective CTE near zero over tens of Kelvin via mirror deflection compensating spacer expansion.

  15. Exact, non-singular black holes from a phantom DBI Field as primordial dark matter

    gr-qc 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Exact non-singular black holes from the phantom DBI field evaporate to gram-mass relics, opening a new mass window for primordial black holes as dark matter.

  16. Black hole mergers beyond general relativity: a self-force approach

    gr-qc 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Self-force theory is extended to compute merger and ringdown waveforms in beyond-GR black hole binaries under the extreme mass-ratio approximation, with first calculations of self-force corrections to the merger waveform.

  17. Generalized Perturbed Kepler Problem: Gravitational Wave Imprints from Eccentric Compact Binaries

    gr-qc 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A unified framework for the perturbed Kepler problem derives modified eccentric orbits and gravitational wave imprints from a general perturbed potential, offering a source-specific alternative to post-Newtonian expansions.

  18. Quantum production of gravitational waves after inflation

    gr-qc 2025-07 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Scalar metric perturbations after inflation break conformal invariance and induce quantum production of gravitons, generating a GW spectrum that peaks near GHz frequencies for standard primordial scalar power spectra.

  19. Eccentric mergers of binary Proca stars

    gr-qc 2025-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Numerical simulations of eccentric Proca-star mergers show that relative phase between the stars controls post-merger fate and can generate odd-mode gravitational waves absent from black-hole mergers.

  20. Rapidly Rotating Neutron Star Collapse in Massive Scalar-Tensor Theories

    gr-qc 2026-05 conditional novelty 6.0

    Numerical simulations of collapsing scalarized neutron stars show scalar radiation energy of order 10^{-3} solar masses, orders of magnitude above the tensor quadrupolar emission, potentially observable to test modifi...

  21. Radio sirens: inferring $H_0$ with binary black holes and neutral hydrogen in the era of the Einstein Telescope and the SKA Observatory

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Using simulated binary black hole mergers and neutral hydrogen maps, the radio sirens method constrains H0 to 8% precision with 3000 high-SNR events, offering a 90% improvement over standard dark siren analyses.

  22. Prospects for multi-messenger discovery of the gravitational-wave background anisotropies via cross-correlation with galaxies

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    New simulations show that cross-correlating gravitational wave background anisotropies with galaxy distributions can enable discovery at angular scales of 4-6 degrees with next-generation observatories.

  23. Efficient and Stable Computation of Gravitational-Wave Fluxes from Generic Kerr Orbits via a Unified HeunC Framework

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A unified confluent HeunC framework computes gravitational-wave fluxes from generic Kerr orbits with 10^{-11} relative errors and speedups of 3-60x over existing packages for low- and high-order modes.

  24. Efficient and Stable Computation of Gravitational-Wave Fluxes from Generic Kerr Orbits via a Unified HeunC Framework

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A unified confluent HeunC framework with hybrid connection-coefficient computation and adaptive bi-power quadrature yields relative errors of order 10^{-11} and 2-10x speedups over existing packages for total radiativ...

  25. Fast neural network surrogate for multimodal effective-one-body gravitational waveforms from generically precessing compact binaries

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Neural network surrogate approximates precessing compact binary gravitational waveforms up to 1000x faster than the base EOB model with validated accuracy.

  26. Post-Newtonian inspiral waveform model for eccentric precessing binaries with higher-order modes and matter effects

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    pyEFPEHM extends prior PN models to include higher-order quasi-circular phasing, generalized precession solutions, and eccentric corrections up to 1PN in selected multipoles for eccentric precessing binaries with matt...

  27. The relativistic restricted three-body problem: geometry and motion around tidally perturbed black holes

    gr-qc 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Increasing tidal deformation around a black hole drives bound geodesics through weak chaos, plunging, unbinding, and eventual depletion of all bound motion, with semi-analytic critical amplitudes for each transition.

  28. Comparing next-generation detector configurations for high-redshift gravitational wave sources with neural posterior estimation

    gr-qc 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Neural posterior estimation shows a two-misaligned-L ET network yields better sky and volume localization for high-redshift massive BBHs than triangular ET, with fewer multimodalities, though luminosity distance estim...

  29. Improved Identification of Strongly Lensed Gravitational Waves with Host Galaxy Locations

    astro-ph.CO 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A two-step Bayesian reweighting scheme using Euclid galaxy locations boosts the Bayes factor for true lensed GW pairs by a factor of about 10 while lowering it for unlensed coincidences.

  30. Excitation factors for horizonless compact objects: long-lived modes, echoes, and greybody factors

    gr-qc 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Excitation factors of long-lived quasinormal modes in horizonless compact objects scale with their small imaginary frequency, suppressing early contributions and producing a hierarchy where prompt ringdown uses ordina...

  31. Spin-up and mass-gain in hyperbolic encounters of spinning black holes

    gr-qc 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Numerical relativity simulations of equal-mass black holes with initial spins from -0.7 to 0.7 in hyperbolic encounters find maximum spin-up of 0.3 and mass increase of 15%, with spin-up decreasing linearly with initi...

  32. Inferring neutron-star Love-Q relations from gravitational waves in the hierarchical Bayesian framework

    gr-qc 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Hierarchical Bayesian inference on 20 high-SNR simulated binary neutron star events shows a linear lnΛ-lnQ relation suffices and constrains dynamical Chern-Simons gravity length scale to ≤10 km.

  33. Post-adiabatic self-force waveforms: slowly spinning primary and precessing secondary

    gr-qc 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Extended 1PA self-force waveforms for slowly spinning primary and precessing secondary, with re-summed 1PAT1R variant showing improved accuracy against NR for q ≳ 5 and |χ1| ≲ 0.1.

  34. GWTC-4.0: Constraints on the Cosmic Expansion Rate and Modified Gravitational-wave Propagation

    astro-ph.CO 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0

    Statistical redshifts inferred from mass spectrum features and galaxy catalogs for 142 GW events yield H0 = 76.6 km s^{-1} Mpc^{-1} and Ξ0 = 1.2, consistent with general relativity.

  35. Distinguishing Neutron Star vs. Low-Mass Black Hole Binaries with Late Inspiral & Postmerger Gravitational Waves $-$ Sensitivity to Transmuted Black Holes and Non-Annihilating Dark Matter

    hep-ph 2025-07 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Future high-frequency-sensitive GW detectors can distinguish binary neutron star from low-mass black hole mergers in late phases, enabling separation of merger rates and constraints on heavy non-annihilating dark matt...

  36. Nucleosynthesis in the fast ejecta of a neutron star merger

    astro-ph.HE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Free neutrons survive r-process freeze-out in fast ejecta of neutron star mergers and their beta-decay heating produces a visible early kilonova precursor for mass fractions above ~0.05.

  37. Black Hole Binary Detection Landscape for the Laser Interferometer Lunar Antenna (LILA): Signal-to-Noise Calculations & Science Cases

    astro-ph.HE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    LILA can detect IMBH binaries at redshifts 20-30, IMRIs, and provide months-to-years early warnings with high-SNR events for gravity tests.

  38. How do the LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA's Heavy Black Holes Form? No evidence for core-collapse Intermediate-mass black holes in GWTC-4

    astro-ph.HE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    No evidence for core-collapse IMBHs in GWTC-4; heavy BHs from hierarchical mergers, with low-spin mass distribution truncating at ~65 solar masses and PIMG upper edge estimated at 150 solar masses.

  39. How do the LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA's Heavy Black Holes Form? No evidence for core-collapse Intermediate-mass black holes in GWTC-4

    astro-ph.HE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    No evidence for core-collapse formed low-spin IMBHs in GWTC-4, with 90% upper limit on merger rate of 0.077 Gpc^{-3} yr^{-1}, low-spin BH mass truncation at 65 solar masses consistent with pair-instability gap lower e...

  40. Parameter Estimation Horizon of Core-Collapse Supernovae with Current and Next-Generation Gravitational-Wave Detectors

    astro-ph.HE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Machine learning extracts core rotation and signal properties from CCSN gravitational waves, with next-generation detectors constraining rotation beyond 100 kpc for favorable orientations despite some uncertainties.

  41. Reviving Motivated Inflationary Potentials with $K$-inflation in the light of ACT

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    K-inflation with non-canonical kinetic term G(φ) shifts α-attractor T-models and natural inflation into the Planck-ACT-LB-BK18 allowed region while satisfying Swampland conjectures and producing testable GW spectra.

  42. Hawking area law in quantum gravity

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Exact Hawking area law from black hole mergers restricts quantum gravity to singular Ricci-flat or specific regular black holes in Stelle and nonlocal theories, derives the standard entropy-area law, and realizes Barr...

  43. Black Hole-Boson Star Binaries: Gravitational Wave Signals and Tidal Disruption

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Numerical simulations of black hole-boson star binaries show that scalar self-interactions can suppress tidal disruption while radiative efficiency depends on the chosen potential.

  44. Are Black Holes Fuzzballs? Probing Horizon-Scale Structure with LISA

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    LISA can constrain non-axisymmetric mass quadrupole deformations at the 10^{-3} level and axisymmetric mass octupole deformations at the 10^{-2} level in EMRI signals to test fuzzball proposals.

  45. Confronting eikonal and post-Kerr methods with numerical evolution of scalar field perturbations in spacetimes beyond Kerr

    gr-qc 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Numerical simulations benchmark the eikonal and post-Kerr approximations for quasinormal modes in deformed Kerr spacetimes, quantifying their errors relative to expected observational precision.

  46. Illuminating the Dark Sector: Understanding Modified Gravity Signatures with Cross-Correlations of Gravitational Waves and Large-Scale Structure

    astro-ph.CO 2025-12 conditional novelty 5.0

    Forecasts indicate that LSS-GW cross-correlations with Stage-IV surveys and Einstein Telescope tighten constraints on modified gravity parameters beyond those from LSS observations alone.

  47. GW231123: Overlapping Gravitational Wave Signals?

    gr-qc 2025-12 conditional novelty 5.0

    GW231123 data favors an overlapping two-signal model over a single merger with Bayes factors of 100-10000, mitigating waveform-dependent discrepancies and suggesting possible gravitational lensing.

  48. Gravitational-wave parameter estimation to the Moon and back: massive binaries and the case of GW231123

    gr-qc 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    LGWA could observe more than one third of known binary black hole events, detect ~90 mergers per year, and measure chirp mass better than third-generation detectors for massive systems.

  49. Primary gravitational waves at high frequencies I: Origin of suppression in the power spectrum

    astro-ph.CO 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Adiabatic regularization combined with smoothed transitions suppresses the high-frequency oscillations in the power spectrum of primary gravitational waves about a zero mean.

  50. LISA as a probe of pre-big-bang physics: a nested sampling analysis

    gr-qc 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Nested sampling analysis indicates LISA could constrain H1, m, sigma_i and beta in the pre-big-bang model to relative uncertainties of about 18 percent under favorable conditions when including foregrounds.

  51. Dynamical Tidal Response of Non-rotating Black Holes: Connecting the MST Formalism and Worldline EFT

    gr-qc 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Renormalized dynamical tidal response functions for non-rotating black holes in GR carry inevitable ambiguities from renormalization scheme and flow initial condition, yielding scheme-dependent dynamical tidal Love nu...

  52. Seeds to success: growing heavy black holes in dense star clusters

    astro-ph.GA 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Simulations indicate stellar collisions dominate intermediate-mass black hole formation across cluster types, with potential to explain local globular cluster candidates and predict wandering IMBHs in Milky Way-like galaxies.

  53. Synergy between CSST and third-generation gravitational-wave detectors: Inferring cosmological parameters using cross-correlation of dark sirens and galaxies

    astro-ph.CO 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Forecasts that cross-correlating 3G GW dark sirens with CSST photometric galaxies yields 1.04% precision on H0 and 2.04% on Omega_m while also constraining GW clustering bias.

  54. On the use of the Derivative Approximation for Likelihoods for Gravitational Wave Inference

    astro-ph.IM 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    DALI extends the Fisher Matrix to higher orders and approximates MCMC posteriors for GW events at 55 times lower cost, with singlet-DALI offering better accuracy and the GWDALI code providing automatic differentiation...

  55. Impact of facility timing and coordination for next-generation gravitational-wave detectors

    gr-qc 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Simulations of ET and CE networks show delays degrade localization metrics far more than SNR, with LIGO India greatly reducing the impact for multi-messenger and stochastic searches.

  56. A multi-parameter expansion for the evolution of asymmetric binaries in astrophysical environments

    gr-qc 2025-07 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A multi-parameter formalism is developed to describe asymmetric binaries in general matter distributions by perturbing around Schwarzschild and reducing metric and fluid perturbations to wave equations similar to the ...

  57. Binary black holes in the heat of merger

    gr-qc 2025-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Develops a frequency-domain approximant for tidal heating in nonspinning black hole binaries that extends to merger and includes horizon parameters.

  58. Impact of initial mass function on the chemical evolution of high-redshift galaxies

    astro-ph.GA 2025-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Simulations show that an IMF extending to at least 200 solar masses is required to match both the observed mass-metallicity-SFR relation and cosmic star formation history at z greater than or equal to 4, due to enhanc...

  59. Geometry of transient gravitational waves and estimation of efficiencies of different detector configurations

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    A geometrical method is introduced for analyzing transient gravitational waves to estimate efficiencies of different detector configurations.

  60. Not too close! Evaluating the impact of the baseline on the localization of binary black holes by next-generation gravitational-wave detectors

    gr-qc 2026-04 conditional novelty 4.0

    Baselines of 8-11 ms light travel time for two CE detectors provide a reasonable compromise for BBH sky localization, with third detectors eliminating multimodality for most or all events.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

299 extracted references · 299 canonical work pages · cited by 64 Pith papers · 18 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger

    LIGO Scientific, Virgo Collaboration, B. P. Abbott et al., “Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 no. 6, (2016) 061102, arXiv:1602.03837 [gr-qc]

  2. [2]

    GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral

    LIGO Scientific, Virgo Collaboration, B. P. Abbott et al., “GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 no. 16, (2017) 161101, arXiv:1710.05832 [gr-qc]

  3. [3]

    Gravitational Waves and Gamma-rays from a Binary Neutron Star Merger: GW170817 and GRB 170817A

    LIGO Scientific, Virgo, Fermi-GBM, INTEGRAL Collaboration, B. P. Abbott et al., “Gravitational Waves and Gamma-rays from a Binary Neutron Star Merger: GW170817 and GRB 170817A,” Astrophys. J. Lett. 848 no. 2, (2017) L13, arXiv:1710.05834 [astro-ph.HE]

  4. [4]

    Multi-messenger Observations of a Binary Neutron Star Merger

    LIGO Scientific, Virgo, Fermi GBM, INTEGRAL, IceCube, AstroSat Cadmium Zinc Telluride Imager Team, IPN, Insight-Hxmt, ANTARES, Swift, AGILE Team, 1M2H Team, Dark Energy Camera GW-EM, DES, DLT40, GRAWITA, Fermi-LAT, ATCA, ASKAP, Las Cumbres Observatory Group, OzGrav, DWF (Deeper Wider Faster Program), AST3, CAASTRO, VINROUGE, MASTER, J-GEM, GROWTH, JAGWAR,...

  5. [5]

    GWTC-2: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the First Half of the Third Observing Run

    LIGO Scientific, Virgo Collaboration, R. Abbott et al., “GWTC-2: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the First Half of the Third Observing Run,” Phys. Rev. X 11 (2021) 021053, arXiv:2010.14527 [gr-qc]

  6. [6]

    GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the Second Part of the Third Observing Run

    KAGRA, VIRGO, LIGO Scientific Collaboration, R. Abbott et al., “GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the Second Part of the Third Observing Run,” Phys. Rev. X 13 no. 4, (2023) 041039, arXiv:2111.03606 [gr-qc]

  7. [7]

    The population of merging compact binaries inferred using gravitational waves through GWTC-3

    KAGRA, VIRGO, LIGO Scientific Collaboration, R. Abbott et al., “Population of Merging Compact Binaries Inferred Using Gravitational Waves through GWTC-3,” Phys. Rev. X 13 no. 1, (2023) 011048, arXiv:2111.03634 [astro-ph.HE]

  8. [8]

    Tests of General Relativity with GWTC-3

    LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA Collaboration, R. Abbott et al., “Tests of General Relativity with GWTC-3,” arXiv:2112.06861 [gr-qc]

  9. [9]

    Abbott et al

    LIGO Scientific, Virgo, KAGRA Collaboration, R. Abbott et al., “Constraints on the Cosmic Expansion History from GWTC–3,” Astrophys. J. 949 no. 2, (2023) 76, arXiv:2111.03604 [astro-ph.CO]

  10. [10]

    The Einstein Telescope: A third-generation gravitational wave observatory,

    M. Punturo et al., “The Einstein Telescope: A third-generation gravitational wave observatory,” Class. Quant. Grav. 27 (2010) 194002

  11. [11]

    Sensitivity Studies for Third-Generation Gravitational Wave Observatories

    S. Hild et al., “Sensitivity Studies for Third-Generation Gravitational Wave Observatories,” Class. Quant. Grav. 28 (2011) 094013, arXiv:1012.0908 [gr-qc]

  12. [12]

    Cosmic Explorer: The U.S. Contribution to Gravitational-Wave Astronomy beyond LIGO

    D. Reitze et al., “Cosmic Explorer: The U.S. Contribution to Gravitational-Wave Astronomy beyond LIGO,” Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 51 no. 7, (2019) 035, arXiv:1907.04833 [astro-ph.IM]

  13. [13]

    A Horizon Study for Cosmic Explorer: Science, Observatories, and Community

    M. Evans et al., “A Horizon Study for Cosmic Explorer: Science, Observatories, and Community,” arXiv:2109.09882 [astro-ph.IM] . – 582 –

  14. [14]

    Evans et al., (2023), arXiv:2306.13745 [astro-ph.IM]

    M. Evans et al., “Cosmic Explorer: A Submission to the NSF MPSAC ngGW Subcommittee,” arXiv:2306.13745 [astro-ph.IM]

  15. [15]

    Science Case for the Einstein Telescope

    M. Maggiore et al., “Science Case for the Einstein Telescope,” JCAP 03 (2020) 050, arXiv:1912.02622 [astro-ph.CO]

  16. [16]

    Science with the Einstein Telescope: a comparison of different designs

    M. Branchesi et al., “Science with the Einstein Telescope: a comparison of different designs,” JCAP 07 (2023) 068, arXiv:2303.15923 [gr-qc]

  17. [17]

    The four-dimensionality of space and the Einstein tensor,

    D. Lovelock, “The four-dimensionality of space and the Einstein tensor,” J. Math. Phys. 13 (1972) 874–876

  18. [18]

    Notes Phys.892 3–24 [arXiv:1404.2955]

    T. P. Sotiriou, “Gravity and Scalar Fields,” Lect. Notes Phys. 892 (2015) 3–24, arXiv:1404.2955 [gr-qc]

  19. [19]

    Testing General Relativity with Present and Future Astrophysical Observations

    E. Berti et al., “Testing General Relativity with Present and Future Astrophysical Observations,” Class. Quant. Grav. 32 (2015) 243001, arXiv:1501.07274 [gr-qc]

  20. [20]

    Detecting the tail effect in gravitational wave experiments,

    L. Blanchet and B. S. Sathyaprakash, “Detecting the tail effect in gravitational wave experiments,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 74 (1995) 1067–1070

  21. [21]

    Testing post-Newtonian theory with gravitational wave observations

    K. G. Arun, B. R. Iyer, M. S. S. Qusailah, and B. S. Sathyaprakash, “Testing post-Newtonian theory with gravitational wave observations,” Class. Quant. Grav. 23 (2006) L37–L43, arXiv:gr-qc/0604018

  22. [22]

    Probing the non-linear structure of general relativity with black hole binaries

    K. G. Arun, B. R. Iyer, M. S. S. Qusailah, and B. S. Sathyaprakash, “Probing the non-linear structure of general relativity with black hole binaries,” Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 024006, arXiv:gr-qc/0604067

  23. [23]

    Fundamental Theoretical Bias in Gravitational Wave Astrophysics and the Parameterized Post-Einsteinian Framework

    N. Yunes and F. Pretorius, “Fundamental Theoretical Bias in Gravitational Wave Astrophysics and the Parameterized Post-Einsteinian Framework,” Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 122003, arXiv:0909.3328 [gr-qc]

  24. [24]

    Parametrized tests of post-Newtonian theory using Advanced LIGO and Einstein Telescope

    C. K. Mishra, K. G. Arun, B. R. Iyer, and B. S. Sathyaprakash, “Parametrized tests of post-Newtonian theory using Advanced LIGO and Einstein Telescope,” Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 064010, arXiv:1005.0304 [gr-qc]

  25. [25]

    Towards a generic test of the strong field dynamics of general relativity using compact binary coalescence

    T. G. F. Li, W. Del Pozzo, S. Vitale, C. Van Den Broeck, M. Agathos, J. Veitch, K. Grover, T. Sidery, R. Sturani, and A. Vecchio, “Towards a generic test of the strong field dynamics of general relativity using compact binary coalescence,” Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 082003, arXiv:1110.0530 [gr-qc]

  26. [26]

    TIGER: A data analysis pipeline for testing the strong-field dynamics of general relativity with gravitational wave signals from coalescing compact binaries

    M. Agathos, W. Del Pozzo, T. G. F. Li, C. Van Den Broeck, J. Veitch, and S. Vitale, “TIGER: A data analysis pipeline for testing the strong-field dynamics of general relativity with gravitational wave signals from coalescing compact binaries,” Phys. Rev. D 89 no. 8, (2014) 082001, arXiv:1311.0420 [gr-qc]

  27. [27]

    J. Meidam et al., “Parametrized tests of the strong-field dynamics of general relativity using gravitational wave signals from coalescing binary black holes: Fast likelihood calculations and sensitivity of the method,” Phys. Rev. D 97 no. 4, (2018) 044033, arXiv:1712.08772 [gr-qc]

  28. [28]

    A no-hair test for binary black holes,

    S. Dhanpal, A. Ghosh, A. K. Mehta, P. Ajith, and B. S. Sathyaprakash, “A no-hair test for binary black holes,” Phys. Rev. D 99 no. 10, (2019) 104056, arXiv:1804.03297 [gr-qc]

  29. [29]

    Islam, A

    T. Islam, A. K. Mehta, A. Ghosh, V. Varma, P. Ajith, and B. S. Sathyaprakash, “Testing the no-hair nature of binary black holes using the consistency of multipolar gravitational radiation,” Phys. Rev. D 101 no. 2, (2020) 024032, arXiv:1910.14259 [gr-qc]

  30. [30]

    Binary black hole spectroscopy: a no-hair test of GW190814 and GW190412,

    C. D. Capano and A. H. Nitz, “Binary black hole spectroscopy: a no-hair test of GW190814 and GW190412,” Phys. Rev. D 102 no. 12, (2020) 124070, arXiv:2008.02248 [gr-qc] . – 583 –

  31. [31]

    Puecher, C

    A. Puecher, C. Kalaghatgi, S. Roy, Y. Setyawati, I. Gupta, B. S. Sathyaprakash, and C. Van Den Broeck, “Testing general relativity using higher-order modes of gravitational waves from binary black holes,” Phys. Rev. D 106 no. 8, (2022) 082003, arXiv:2205.09062 [gr-qc]

  32. [32]

    Post-Newtonian Theory for Gravitational Waves

    L. Blanchet, “Gravitational Radiation from Post-Newtonian Sources and Inspiralling Compact Binaries,” Living Rev. Rel. 17 (2014) 2, arXiv:1310.1528 [gr-qc]

  33. [33]

    Extreme Gravity Tests with Gravitational Waves from Compact Binary Coalescences: (I) Inspiral-Merger

    E. Berti, K. Yagi, and N. Yunes, “Extreme Gravity Tests with Gravitational Waves from Compact Binary Coalescences: (I) Inspiral-Merger,” Gen. Rel. Grav. 50 no. 4, (2018) 46, arXiv:1801.03208 [gr-qc]

  34. [35]

    Frequency-domain gravitational waves from non-precessing black-hole binaries. I. New numerical waveforms and anatomy of the signal

    S. Husa, S. Khan, M. Hannam, M. P¨ urrer, F. Ohme, X. Jim´ enez Forteza, and A. Boh´ e, “Frequency-domain gravitational waves from nonprecessing black-hole binaries. I. New numerical waveforms and anatomy of the signal,” Phys. Rev. D 93 no. 4, (2016) 044006, arXiv:1508.07250 [gr-qc]

  35. [36]

    Frequency-domain gravitational waves from non-precessing black-hole binaries. II. A phenomenological model for the advanced detector era

    S. Khan, S. Husa, M. Hannam, F. Ohme, M. P¨ urrer, X. Jim´ enez Forteza, and A. Boh´ e, “Frequency-domain gravitational waves from nonprecessing black-hole binaries. II. A phenomenological model for the advanced detector era,” Phys. Rev. D 93 no. 4, (2016) 044007, arXiv:1508.07253 [gr-qc]

  36. [37]

    A simple model of complete precessing black-hole-binary gravitational waveforms

    M. Hannam, P. Schmidt, A. Boh´ e, L. Haegel, S. Husa, F. Ohme, G. Pratten, and M. P¨ urrer, “Simple Model of Complete Precessing Black-Hole-Binary Gravitational Waveforms,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 no. 15, (2014) 151101, arXiv:1308.3271 [gr-qc]

  37. [38]

    Tests of General Relativity with Binary Black Holes from the second LIGO-Virgo Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog

    LIGO Scientific, Virgo Collaboration, R. Abbott et al., “Tests of general relativity with binary black holes from the second LIGO-Virgo gravitational-wave transient catalog,” Phys. Rev. D 103 no. 12, (2021) 122002, arXiv:2010.14529 [gr-qc]

  38. [39]

    Gravitational-wave observations as a tool for testing relativistic gravity,

    D. M. Eardley, D. L. Lee, and A. P. Lightman, “Gravitational-wave observations as a tool for testing relativistic gravity,” Phys. Rev. D 8 (1973) 3308–3321

  39. [40]

    Gravitational-wave observations as a tool for testing relativistic gravity,

    D. M. Eardley, D. L. Lee, A. P. Lightman, R. V. Wagoner, and C. M. Will, “Gravitational-wave observations as a tool for testing relativistic gravity,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 30 (1973) 884–886

  40. [41]

    Scalar gravitational waves from scalar-tensor gravity: Production and response of interferometers,

    S. Capozziello and C. Corda, “Scalar gravitational waves from scalar-tensor gravity: Production and response of interferometers,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 15 (2006) 1119–1150

  41. [42]

    Primordial production of massive relic gravitational waves from a weak modification of General Relativity,

    C. Corda, “Primordial production of massive relic gravitational waves from a weak modification of General Relativity,” Astropart. Phys. 30 (2008) 209–215, arXiv:0812.0483 [gr-qc]

  42. [43]

    Polarizations of Gravitational Waves in Horndeski Theory

    S. Hou, Y. Gong, and Y. Liu, “Polarizations of Gravitational Waves in Horndeski Theory,” Eur. Phys. J. C 78 no. 5, (2018) 378, arXiv:1704.01899 [gr-qc]

  43. [44]

    Polarizations of gravitational waves in $f(R)$ gravity

    D. Liang, Y. Gong, S. Hou, and Y. Liu, “Polarizations of gravitational waves in f(R) gravity,” Phys. Rev. D 95 no. 10, (2017) 104034, arXiv:1701.05998 [gr-qc]

  44. [45]

    Gauge invariant formulation of metric f(R) gravity for gravitational waves,

    F. Moretti, F. Bombacigno, and G. Montani, “Gauge invariant formulation of metric f(R) gravity for gravitational waves,” Phys. Rev. D 100 no. 8, (2019) 084014, arXiv:1906.01899 [gr-qc]

  45. [46]

    Einstein-Aether Waves

    T. Jacobson and D. Mattingly, “Einstein-Aether waves,” Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 024003, arXiv:gr-qc/0402005

  46. [47]

    Gravitational waves in Einstein-{\ae}ther and generalized TeVeS theory after GW170817

    Y. Gong, S. Hou, D. Liang, and E. Papantonopoulos, “Gravitational waves in Einstein-æther and generalized TeVeS theory after GW170817,” Phys. Rev. D 97 no. 8, (2018) 084040, arXiv:1801.03382 [gr-qc] . – 584 –

  47. [48]

    Theoretical Aspects of Massive Gravity

    K. Hinterbichler, “Theoretical Aspects of Massive Gravity,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 84 (2012) 671–710, arXiv:1105.3735 [hep-th]

  48. [49]

    Liang, R

    D. Liang, R. Xu, X. Lu, and L. Shao, “Polarizations of gravitational waves in the bumblebee gravity model,” Phys. Rev. D 106 no. 12, (2022) 124019, arXiv:2207.14423 [gr-qc]

  49. [50]

    Gravitational waves from brane world inflation,

    A. V. Frolov and L. Kofman, “Gravitational waves from brane world inflation,” arXiv:hep-th/0209133

  50. [51]

    Gravitational Radiation from Binary Systems in Alternative Metric Theories of Gravity: Dipole Radiation and the Binary Pulsar,

    C. M. Will, “Gravitational Radiation from Binary Systems in Alternative Metric Theories of Gravity: Dipole Radiation and the Binary Pulsar,” Astrophys. J. 214 (1977) 826–839

  51. [52]

    Radiation damping in Einstein-aether theory,

    B. Z. Foster, “Radiation damping in Einstein-aether theory,” Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 104012, arXiv:gr-qc/0602004. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 75, 129904 (2007)]

  52. [53]

    Zhang, X

    C. Zhang, X. Zhao, A. Wang, B. Wang, K. Yagi, N. Yunes, W. Zhao, and T. Zhu, “Gravitational waves from the quasicircular inspiral of compact binaries in Einstein-aether theory,” Phys. Rev. D 101 no. 4, (2020) 044002, arXiv:1911.10278 [gr-qc] . [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 104, 069905 (2021)]

  53. [54]

    An Approach to gravitational radiation by a method of spin coefficients,

    E. Newman and R. Penrose, “An Approach to gravitational radiation by a method of spin coefficients,” J. Math. Phys. 3 (1962) 566–578

  54. [55]

    Bahamonde, M

    S. Bahamonde, M. Caruana, K. F. Dialektopoulos, V. Gakis, M. Hohmann, J. Levi Said, E. N. Saridakis, and J. Sultana, “Gravitational-wave propagation and polarizations in the teleparallel analog of Horndeski gravity,” Phys. Rev. D 104 no. 8, (2021) 084082, arXiv:2105.13243 [gr-qc]

  55. [56]

    Gauge Invariant Cosmological Perturbations,

    J. M. Bardeen, “Gauge Invariant Cosmological Perturbations,” Phys. Rev. D 22 (1980) 1882–1905

  56. [57]

    Chern-Simons Modification of General Relativity

    R. Jackiw and S. Y. Pi, “Chern-Simons modification of general relativity,” Phys. Rev. D 68 (2003) 104012, arXiv:gr-qc/0308071

  57. [58]

    The basics of gravitational wave theory

    E. E. Flanagan and S. A. Hughes, “The Basics of gravitational wave theory,” New J. Phys. 7 (2005) 204, arXiv:gr-qc/0501041

  58. [59]

    Nonlocal theory of massive gravity,

    M. Jaccard, M. Maggiore, and E. Mitsou, “Nonlocal theory of massive gravity,” Phys. Rev. D 88 no. 4, (2013) 044033, arXiv:1305.3034 [hep-th]

  59. [60]

    Maggiore, Gravitational Waves

    M. Maggiore, Gravitational Waves. Vol. 2: Astrophysics and Cosmology . Oxford University Press, 2018

  60. [61]

    Resummation of Massive Gravity

    C. de Rham, G. Gabadadze, and A. J. Tolley, “Resummation of Massive Gravity,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 (2011) 231101, arXiv:1011.1232 [hep-th]

  61. [62]

    Non-local massive gravity,

    L. Modesto and S. Tsujikawa, “Non-local massive gravity,” Phys. Lett. B 727 (2013) 48–56, arXiv:1307.6968 [hep-th]

  62. [63]

    Cosmological dynamics and dark energy from nonlocal infrared modifications of gravity,

    S. Foffa, M. Maggiore, and E. Mitsou, “Cosmological dynamics and dark energy from nonlocal infrared modifications of gravity,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 29 (2014) 1450116, arXiv:1311.3435 [hep-th]

  63. [64]

    Phantom dark energy from non-local infrared modifications of General Relativity

    M. Maggiore, “Phantom dark energy from nonlocal infrared modifications of General Relativity,” Phys.Rev. D89 (2014) 043008, arXiv:1307.3898 [hep-th]

  64. [65]

    Nonlocal Infrared Modifications of Gravity. A Review,

    M. Maggiore, “Nonlocal Infrared Modifications of Gravity. A Review,” Fundam. Theor. Phys. 187 (2017) 221–281, arXiv:1606.08784 [hep-th]

  65. [66]

    Gravity in the infrared and effective nonlocal models,

    E. Belgacem, Y. Dirian, A. Finke, S. Foffa, and M. Maggiore, “Gravity in the infrared and effective nonlocal models,” JCAP 04 (2020) 010, arXiv:2001.07619 [astro-ph.CO]

  66. [67]

    Calcagni, L

    G. Calcagni, L. Modesto, and G. Nardelli, “Non-perturbative spectrum of non-local gravity,” Phys. Lett. B 795 (2019) 391–397, arXiv:1803.07848 [hep-th] . – 585 –

  67. [68]

    Renormalization of Higher Derivative Quantum Gravity,

    K. S. Stelle, “Renormalization of Higher Derivative Quantum Gravity,” Phys. Rev. D 16 (1977) 953–969

  68. [69]

    Gravitational Radiation, Close Binary Systems, and the Brans-dicke Theory of Gravity,

    C. M. Will and H. W. Zaglauer, “Gravitational Radiation, Close Binary Systems, and the Brans-dicke Theory of Gravity,” Astrophys. J. 346 (1989) 366

  69. [70]

    Strong Binary Pulsar Constraints on Lorentz Violation in Gravity,

    K. Yagi, D. Blas, N. Yunes, and E. Barausse, “Strong Binary Pulsar Constraints on Lorentz Violation in Gravity,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 no. 16, (2014) 161101, arXiv:1307.6219 [gr-qc]

  70. [71]

    Constraints on Einstein-Æther theory and Hoˇ rava gravity from binary pulsar observations,

    K. Yagi, D. Blas, E. Barausse, and N. Yunes, “Constraints on Einstein-Æther theory and Hoˇ rava gravity from binary pulsar observations,”Phys. Rev. D 89 no. 8, (2014) 084067, arXiv:1311.7144 [gr-qc] . [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 90, 069902 (2014), Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 90, 069901 (2014)]

  71. [72]

    Model-Independent Test of General Relativity: An Extended post-Einsteinian Framework with Complete Polarization Content

    K. Chatziioannou, N. Yunes, and N. Cornish, “Model-Independent Test of General Relativity: An Extended post-Einsteinian Framework with Complete Polarization Content,” Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 022004, arXiv:1204.2585 [gr-qc] . [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 95, 129901 (2017)]

  72. [73]

    Theory-Agnostic Constraints on Black-Hole Dipole Radiation with Multi-Band Gravitational-Wave Astrophysics

    E. Barausse, N. Yunes, and K. Chamberlain, “Theory-Agnostic Constraints on Black-Hole Dipole Radiation with Multiband Gravitational-Wave Astrophysics,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 no. 24, (2016) 241104, arXiv:1603.04075 [gr-qc]

  73. [74]

    Probing non-tensorial polarizations of stochastic gravitational-wave backgrounds with ground-based laser interferometers

    A. Nishizawa, A. Taruya, K. Hayama, S. Kawamura, and M.-a. Sakagami, “Probing non-tensorial polarizations of stochastic gravitational-wave backgrounds with ground-based laser interferometers,” Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 082002, arXiv:0903.0528 [astro-ph.CO]

  74. [75]

    Sensitivity of third-generation interferometers to extra polarizations in the stochastic gravitational wave background,

    L. Amalberti, N. Bartolo, and A. Ricciardone, “Sensitivity of third-generation interferometers to extra polarizations in the stochastic gravitational wave background,” Phys. Rev. D 105 no. 6, (2022) 064033, arXiv:2105.13197 [astro-ph.CO]

  75. [76]

    Frequency response of space-based interferometric gravitational-wave detectors

    D. Liang, Y. Gong, A. J. Weinstein, C. Zhang, and C. Zhang, “Frequency response of space-based interferometric gravitational-wave detectors,” Phys. Rev. D 99 no. 10, (2019) 104027, arXiv:1901.09624 [gr-qc]

  76. [77]

    Zhang, Q

    C. Zhang, Q. Gao, Y. Gong, D. Liang, A. J. Weinstein, and C. Zhang, “Frequency response of time-delay interferometry for space-based gravitational wave antenna,” Phys. Rev. D 100 no. 6, (2019) 064033, arXiv:1906.10901 [gr-qc]

  77. [78]

    Pulsar Timing as a Probe of Non-Einsteinian Polarizations of Gravitational Waves,

    K. J. Lee, F. A. Jenet, and R. H. Price, “Pulsar Timing as a Probe of Non-Einsteinian Polarizations of Gravitational Waves,” The Astrophysical Journal 685 no. 2, (Oct., 2008) 1304–1319

  78. [79]

    Stochastic backgrounds in a lternative theories of gravity: Overlap reduction functions for pulsar timing arrays

    S. J. Chamberlin and X. Siemens, “Stochastic backgrounds in alternative theories of gravity: overlap reduction functions for pulsar timing arrays,” Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 082001, arXiv:1111.5661 [astro-ph.HE]

  79. [80]

    Detection methods for stochastic gravitational-wave backgrounds: a unified treatment

    J. D. Romano and N. J. Cornish, “Detection methods for stochastic gravitational-wave backgrounds: a unified treatment,” Living Rev. Rel. 20 no. 1, (2017) 2, arXiv:1608.06889 [gr-qc]

  80. [81]

    Measuring the stochastic gravitational radiation background with laser interferometric antennas,

    N. Christensen, “Measuring the stochastic gravitational radiation background with laser interferometric antennas,” Phys. Rev. D 46 (1992) 5250–5266

Showing first 80 references.