{"as_of":"2026-08-17T04:03:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:cfb77a12d34f88e9467175d7327eb943b4ed1c22e4ac9266ecea9629148b4575","coverage":[{"denominator":0,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":1,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":1,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-07-14T10:37:22.521896Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"cited_works","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2503.23243","last_updated":"2025-06-16T00:52:04Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T12:45:40.988139Z","submitted_at":"2025-03-29T22:53:15Z","title":"Evaluating how LLM annotations represent diverse views on contentious topics","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2503.23243","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-14T10:37:22.521896Z","title":"arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.23243 , year=","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.10590","last_updated":"2026-07-12T06:00:51Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T16:36:23.835055Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-12T06:00:51Z","title":"Demographic Prompting at Scale: When More Attributes Hurt LLM--Human Agreement","version":1},"reference_index":36,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-07-14T10:37:22.521896Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2503.23243","citing_paper":"/paper/2607.10590"},"observation_digest":"sha256:8f191b25f3d9adf7fdc02abf6e9bab7b3a7e44e5fcd2e138a6a5843bc2d92f8f","observation_id":"e66cc40c-6ada-4f16-82a3-fbc31fcdd16a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-14T10:37:22.521896Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}}],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2503.23243/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2503.23243/integrity","json":"/paper/2503.23243/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2503.23243"},"outbound":[],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2503.23243","last_updated":"2025-06-16T00:52:04Z","latest_version":2,"primary_category":"cs.CL","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T12:45:40.988139Z","submitted_at":"2025-03-29T22:53:15Z","title":"Evaluating how LLM annotations represent diverse views on contentious topics"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":0,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":0,"verified_exact":0,"verified_fuzzy":0},"total_outbound_references":0},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 17 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 1 inbound Pith citation observation for arXiv:2503.23243."}