{"as_of":"2026-08-17T10:15:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:ecda9e6f2fcd3e75dd30c0b7cde80ff608df48193f32e3ea05dbb2290dbe22c1","coverage":[{"denominator":25,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":25,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:10:19.417771Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":25,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":25,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":0,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"cited_works","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2504.16310/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2504.16310/integrity","json":"/paper/2504.16310/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2504.16310"},"outbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:10:19.306650Z","title":"Mi ning code review data to understand waiting times between accept ance and merging: an empirical analysis,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2504.16310","last_updated":"2025-04-22T23:07:24Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:04:08.689653Z","submitted_at":"2025-04-22T23:07:24Z","title":"Improving Automated Secure Code Reviews: A Synthetic Dataset for Code Vulnerability Flaws","version":1},"reference_index":1,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:10:19.306650Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2504.16310"},"observation_digest":"sha256:9bef3566a01aa2a70c54a1d7ffefa85226157a24c569c708541aa812640af73b","observation_id":"e81cdf66-fc56-4c78-ac4c-bfaa72eb8977","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:10:19.306650Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"malformed_identifier"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:10:20.299486Z","title":"Impact of peer code review on pee r impression formation: A survey,","venue":null,"work_id":"1d555824-e25e-45c2-811c-fb9d867a9c36","year":2013},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2504.16310","last_updated":"2025-04-22T23:07:24Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:04:08.689653Z","submitted_at":"2025-04-22T23:07:24Z","title":"Improving Automated Secure Code Reviews: A Synthetic Dataset for Code Vulnerability Flaws","version":1},"reference_index":2,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:10:19.314168Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2504.16310"},"observation_digest":"sha256:0deb642a6c1917812fd00202fae63f2c514fb1d6784579ec64ed28d57979205a","observation_id":"860a4f91-48a3-457d-b3ff-ff61b30678d3","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:10:20.303903Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-17T06:30:54.323127+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:10:19.324270Z","title":"LLaMA- Reviewer: Advancing Code Review Automation with Large Language Models through Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning ,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2504.16310","last_updated":"2025-04-22T23:07:24Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:04:08.689653Z","submitted_at":"2025-04-22T23:07:24Z","title":"Improving Automated Secure Code Reviews: A Synthetic Dataset for Code Vulnerability Flaws","version":1},"reference_index":4,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:10:19.324270Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2504.16310"},"observation_digest":"sha256:66bc04adfd34e37ac0aca6070b9880436f5e8c68527992d18813913f763dde59","observation_id":"224b8715-f0e5-4fec-9a72-7e6cfd332fbc","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:10:19.324270Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:10:20.286812Z","title":"D-act: Towards diff-aware code transformation for code re view under a time-wise evaluation,","venue":null,"work_id":"cb4859d1-d0b2-4433-aa55-a70120276e77","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2504.16310","last_updated":"2025-04-22T23:07:24Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:04:08.689653Z","submitted_at":"2025-04-22T23:07:24Z","title":"Improving Automated Secure Code Reviews: A Synthetic Dataset for Code Vulnerability Flaws","version":1},"reference_index":5,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:10:19.329240Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2504.16310"},"observation_digest":"sha256:ec08abadfe6bec7f89216b34bfa3acabd5d3e9a87aae1614f5b81847703ee400","observation_id":"ef9c621f-4039-48da-8593-1ec4f860b76c","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:10:20.290803Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-17T06:30:54.323127+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:10:19.333672Z","title":"Code review automation: Strengths and weaknesses of the st ate of the art,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2504.16310","last_updated":"2025-04-22T23:07:24Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:04:08.689653Z","submitted_at":"2025-04-22T23:07:24Z","title":"Improving Automated Secure Code Reviews: A Synthetic Dataset for Code Vulnerability Flaws","version":1},"reference_index":6,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:10:19.333672Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2504.16310"},"observation_digest":"sha256:fb62f35db7dc75698ef3105f2320d252443c8d58e6ef6dcae53d4e20bdba3221","observation_id":"6905c5c2-f67b-40b3-acbd-eca6023235b0","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:10:19.333672Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:10:19.339410Z","title":"Codee ditor: Learning to edit source code with pre-trained models,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2504.16310","last_updated":"2025-04-22T23:07:24Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:04:08.689653Z","submitted_at":"2025-04-22T23:07:24Z","title":"Improving Automated Secure Code Reviews: A Synthetic Dataset for Code Vulnerability Flaws","version":1},"reference_index":7,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:10:19.339410Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2504.16310"},"observation_digest":"sha256:926f7c45fbf7a453d93c0ff914374d1b9851c226bdaedeb9674ca57a68d26188","observation_id":"989a4add-77b8-4a25-b469-f213d237da8c","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:10:19.339410Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:10:19.344482Z","title":"Security Defect Detection via Code Review: A Study of the OpenStack and Qt Communities ,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2504.16310","last_updated":"2025-04-22T23:07:24Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:04:08.689653Z","submitted_at":"2025-04-22T23:07:24Z","title":"Improving Automated Secure Code Reviews: A Synthetic Dataset for Code Vulnerability Flaws","version":1},"reference_index":8,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:10:19.344482Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2504.16310"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c3da4bfc5401bfe834a14ddcc2f01ff81bdc75caa6f1dd28abc9cb7899acf08e","observation_id":"290231a8-b285-404d-85fd-807a3f36ee41","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:10:19.344482Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:10:19.349151Z","title":"Software security during mode rn code review: the developer’s perspective,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2504.16310","last_updated":"2025-04-22T23:07:24Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:04:08.689653Z","submitted_at":"2025-04-22T23:07:24Z","title":"Improving Automated Secure Code Reviews: A Synthetic Dataset for Code Vulnerability Flaws","version":1},"reference_index":9,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:10:19.349151Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2504.16310"},"observation_digest":"sha256:19d58de1a0d3d14129890d51a8f59bbe8729a73da22fa72c4ca057b6afe3f80d","observation_id":"b1892daa-ddde-40f9-988c-6ea1d22ea2fd","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:10:19.349151Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"malformed_identifier"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:10:19.353675Z","title":"Automa ting code review activities by large-scale pre-training,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2504.16310","last_updated":"2025-04-22T23:07:24Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:04:08.689653Z","submitted_at":"2025-04-22T23:07:24Z","title":"Improving Automated Secure Code Reviews: A Synthetic Dataset for Code Vulnerability Flaws","version":1},"reference_index":10,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:10:19.353675Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2504.16310"},"observation_digest":"sha256:7dde98b6d13e7f6020868ede116acf342aec808ed1c89a67889f8184a4f78fb1","observation_id":"e58536cc-29d1-4d63-9abc-6baba75c8e9b","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:10:19.353675Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:10:19.358363Z","title":"Using pre-trained models to boost code revie w automation,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2504.16310","last_updated":"2025-04-22T23:07:24Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:04:08.689653Z","submitted_at":"2025-04-22T23:07:24Z","title":"Improving Automated Secure Code Reviews: A Synthetic Dataset for Code Vulnerability Flaws","version":1},"reference_index":11,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:10:19.358363Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2504.16310"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f4df2c50340478db9bc8620eeb05f405bbc8e024d5d2090dbf557bb8bdad783c","observation_id":"ead7ae73-c588-4516-b52c-11ce50618a59","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:10:19.358363Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:10:19.362757Z","title":"Improving automated code reviews: Learning from experien ce,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2504.16310","last_updated":"2025-04-22T23:07:24Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:04:08.689653Z","submitted_at":"2025-04-22T23:07:24Z","title":"Improving Automated Secure Code Reviews: A Synthetic Dataset for Code Vulnerability Flaws","version":1},"reference_index":12,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:10:19.362757Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2504.16310"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f09bea8847ebccb75efdf25617882cf8eb68e4e6e1886073a1297259a7d13b2e","observation_id":"70c54712-4d92-44db-9352-36caabd956f1","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:10:19.362757Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:10:19.368200Z","title":"Towards automating code review activities,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2504.16310","last_updated":"2025-04-22T23:07:24Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:04:08.689653Z","submitted_at":"2025-04-22T23:07:24Z","title":"Improving Automated Secure Code Reviews: A Synthetic Dataset for Code Vulnerability Flaws","version":1},"reference_index":13,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:10:19.368200Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2504.16310"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a7d0e1e8962383e83eb0003172a7035b0444d92211a00dc287838fa7408f1fbe","observation_id":"0e1377ff-7cbd-45a0-ab31-08fa0c5309ea","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:10:19.368200Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:10:19.372229Z","title":"Exploring the potential of chatgpt in automated code refine ment: An empirical study,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2504.16310","last_updated":"2025-04-22T23:07:24Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:04:08.689653Z","submitted_at":"2025-04-22T23:07:24Z","title":"Improving Automated Secure Code Reviews: A Synthetic Dataset for Code Vulnerability Flaws","version":1},"reference_index":14,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:10:19.372229Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2504.16310"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c81086d51782cc1fabefd1a193b2eefeb4835d304fbc7d084a7c48c050a52204","observation_id":"635a6bd5-24ff-47a6-8974-6df30e46217a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:10:19.372229Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:10:19.376059Z","title":"Curated email-based code reviews datasets,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2504.16310","last_updated":"2025-04-22T23:07:24Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:04:08.689653Z","submitted_at":"2025-04-22T23:07:24Z","title":"Improving Automated Secure Code Reviews: A Synthetic Dataset for Code Vulnerability Flaws","version":1},"reference_index":15,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:10:19.376059Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2504.16310"},"observation_digest":"sha256:4484ad6d1d73a2c4a62e3bc971c42951d3f6a1447cc00027d3467938e313f5d2","observation_id":"4dcc0375-261d-44a2-bc9f-5542f0254046","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:10:19.376059Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"malformed_identifier"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2401.17461","last_updated":"2024-01-30T21:49:30Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T14:23:04.388552Z","submitted_at":"2024-01-30T21:49:30Z","title":"Synthetic Dialogue Dataset Generation using LLM Agents","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2401.17461","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:10:19.380284Z","title":"Synthetic dialogue dataset generation using llm agents,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2504.16310","last_updated":"2025-04-22T23:07:24Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:04:08.689653Z","submitted_at":"2025-04-22T23:07:24Z","title":"Improving Automated Secure Code Reviews: A Synthetic Dataset for Code Vulnerability Flaws","version":1},"reference_index":16,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:10:19.380284Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2401.17461","citing_paper":"/paper/2504.16310"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c2fb3dbae762e0f97b3da2830de0f7ef77547a6e2c7eb89da67f0615f887f1cb","observation_id":"002c633e-e099-48bf-8e39-e1ee29d0c66e","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:10:19.380284Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:10:19.384310Z","title":"Llm based generation of item-description for recommendation system,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2504.16310","last_updated":"2025-04-22T23:07:24Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:04:08.689653Z","submitted_at":"2025-04-22T23:07:24Z","title":"Improving Automated Secure Code Reviews: A Synthetic Dataset for Code Vulnerability Flaws","version":1},"reference_index":17,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:10:19.384310Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2504.16310"},"observation_digest":"sha256:3879034bcecec431b4270cac275ae9d16b59e877117537a3b45f738490ff6c1c","observation_id":"d4cf3795-9429-4d94-a171-5e5482a57de5","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:10:19.384310Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:10:20.274414Z","title":"Unnatu ral instructions: Tuning language models with (almost) no huma n labor,","venue":null,"work_id":"a399a06c-87c3-47d8-b67a-2ebb1282b655","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2504.16310","last_updated":"2025-04-22T23:07:24Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:04:08.689653Z","submitted_at":"2025-04-22T23:07:24Z","title":"Improving Automated Secure Code Reviews: A Synthetic Dataset for Code Vulnerability Flaws","version":1},"reference_index":18,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:10:19.387759Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2504.16310"},"observation_digest":"sha256:8b0f3d905873832f103cc11f9836f0b5de2637988b3575316157910f27c5ddc8","observation_id":"5382a45a-a23f-4bef-a783-22820c764b47","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:10:20.278994Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-17T06:30:54.323127+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2202.07922","last_updated":"2022-10-22T01:32:03Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T17:20:55.717220Z","submitted_at":"2022-02-16T08:18:02Z","title":"ZeroGen: Efficient Zero-shot Learning via Dataset Generation","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2202.07922","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:10:19.391259Z","title":"Zerogen: Efficient zero-shot learning via dataset generat ion,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2504.16310","last_updated":"2025-04-22T23:07:24Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:04:08.689653Z","submitted_at":"2025-04-22T23:07:24Z","title":"Improving Automated Secure Code Reviews: A Synthetic Dataset for Code Vulnerability Flaws","version":1},"reference_index":19,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:10:19.391259Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2202.07922","citing_paper":"/paper/2504.16310"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c05e1c96b62b9a16cd1b66d430b717493cc9840bd8dfdc0d9ba2f823491a6e4d","observation_id":"0ff7a3f5-da61-4a59-8b5d-643146f02965","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:10:19.391259Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:10:20.262341Z","title":"Large language model as attributed training data generator: a tale of diversity and bias,","venue":null,"work_id":"d25a3940-1b84-492b-a742-bbc6d72f3232","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2504.16310","last_updated":"2025-04-22T23:07:24Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:04:08.689653Z","submitted_at":"2025-04-22T23:07:24Z","title":"Improving Automated Secure Code Reviews: A Synthetic Dataset for Code Vulnerability Flaws","version":1},"reference_index":20,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:10:19.395643Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2504.16310"},"observation_digest":"sha256:67937d246b6c2e808b7decbfcb34a7fea2cd6f357f6765f1189c226869dda018","observation_id":"151b5831-fb26-4f17-ae14-688ec1c690be","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:10:20.266155Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-17T06:30:54.323127+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:10:20.249377Z","title":"Why security defects g o unnoticed during code reviews? a case-control study of the chromium os project,","venue":null,"work_id":"fb243f99-79ef-42e6-b82c-68eafe8a39a6","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2504.16310","last_updated":"2025-04-22T23:07:24Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:04:08.689653Z","submitted_at":"2025-04-22T23:07:24Z","title":"Improving Automated Secure Code Reviews: A Synthetic Dataset for Code Vulnerability Flaws","version":1},"reference_index":21,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:10:19.399443Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2504.16310"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f1793af2cf9d75eba022b737b49437b027f9812ee54e21746863060c97bd58d2","observation_id":"d6c32e0a-b172-4105-8243-7b87fa0d408e","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:10:20.253365Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-17T06:30:54.323127+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"1062.25912","doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:10:19.540179Z","title":"Characteristics of the vulnerable code chang es identified through peer code review,","venue":null,"work_id":"dc67f429-38fa-4851-9589-36b0deaec036","year":2014},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2504.16310","last_updated":"2025-04-22T23:07:24Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:04:08.689653Z","submitted_at":"2025-04-22T23:07:24Z","title":"Improving Automated Secure Code Reviews: A Synthetic Dataset for Code Vulnerability Flaws","version":1},"reference_index":22,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:10:19.403082Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2504.16310"},"observation_digest":"sha256:bc9c0dcfd86c5cc183c6c2c8010d13e011f6c3aac5d6813be54064da896ec321","observation_id":"3ca48cb9-4d1d-4d5e-a274-6ef839521064","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:10:19.549628Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"metadata_mismatch"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-17T06:30:54.323127+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:10:20.236233Z","title":"Empirical analysis of security-related cod e reviews in npm packages,","venue":null,"work_id":"2aa882cd-51ab-4e85-b166-4aae3d4a8804","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2504.16310","last_updated":"2025-04-22T23:07:24Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:04:08.689653Z","submitted_at":"2025-04-22T23:07:24Z","title":"Improving Automated Secure Code Reviews: A Synthetic Dataset for Code Vulnerability Flaws","version":1},"reference_index":23,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:10:19.407184Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2504.16310"},"observation_digest":"sha256:867be6ddbf495c6b80a10fdc8f3e2a0fac8fad8c0c81d9836cd20d749c016794","observation_id":"ac048c3a-1e6f-42c4-835c-ac1ca8d66103","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:10:20.240299Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-17T06:30:54.323127+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:10:20.224076Z","title":"Language models are few-shot learners,","venue":null,"work_id":"0c13066d-1203-4fb4-898b-d07f4020d040","year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2504.16310","last_updated":"2025-04-22T23:07:24Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:04:08.689653Z","submitted_at":"2025-04-22T23:07:24Z","title":"Improving Automated Secure Code Reviews: A Synthetic Dataset for Code Vulnerability Flaws","version":1},"reference_index":24,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:10:19.411454Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2504.16310"},"observation_digest":"sha256:559c7a1abafeae718101c4b3b4ff756023c7bb00c6897629694b757adb8f9d52","observation_id":"fc0c4e15-692c-4ae2-a92a-52891361d276","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:10:20.228027Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-17T06:30:54.323127+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:10:20.212286Z","title":"Chain-of-thought prompting elicits r easoning in large language models,","venue":null,"work_id":"90d58860-3ad3-41e3-b825-0892564dc7c1","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2504.16310","last_updated":"2025-04-22T23:07:24Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:04:08.689653Z","submitted_at":"2025-04-22T23:07:24Z","title":"Improving Automated Secure Code Reviews: A Synthetic Dataset for Code Vulnerability Flaws","version":1},"reference_index":25,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:10:19.414687Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2504.16310"},"observation_digest":"sha256:6404c2c743a96b59adff3e30b6c0c187faa433c0987b9684b241bba9b6a317d7","observation_id":"d136cf70-a614-496c-93cc-836cf58b5b27","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:10:20.216355Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-17T06:30:54.323127+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2405.06682","last_updated":"2024-10-16T23:19:46Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T13:55:15.115349Z","submitted_at":"2024-05-05T18:56:46Z","title":"Self-Reflection in LLM Agents: Effects on Problem-Solving Performance","version":3},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2405.06682","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:10:19.417771Z","title":"Self-reflection in llm agents: Effects on problem-solving performance,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2504.16310","last_updated":"2025-04-22T23:07:24Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:04:08.689653Z","submitted_at":"2025-04-22T23:07:24Z","title":"Improving Automated Secure Code Reviews: A Synthetic Dataset for Code Vulnerability Flaws","version":1},"reference_index":26,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:10:19.417771Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2405.06682","citing_paper":"/paper/2504.16310"},"observation_digest":"sha256:96837b8ef387b200a71fab106d9626ac3d6d147a5cff9ea3caa9d7c7531cb037","observation_id":"9afa88c1-18ec-429d-b387-571d4ac6f870","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:10:19.417771Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}}],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2504.16310","last_updated":"2025-04-22T23:07:24Z","latest_version":1,"primary_category":"cs.SE","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:04:08.689653Z","submitted_at":"2025-04-22T23:07:24Z","title":"Improving Automated Secure Code Reviews: A Synthetic Dataset for Code Vulnerability Flaws"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":25,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":3,"metadata_mismatch":1,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":13,"verified_exact":0,"verified_fuzzy":8},"total_outbound_references":25},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-17T06:30:54.323127+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 17 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 25 of 25 outbound references and 0 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2504.16310."}