Dark matter and modified gravity: Einstein clusters from a non-minimally coupled vector field

Pedro G. S. Fernandes; Vitor Cardoso

arxiv: 2505.00563 · v2 · submitted 2025-05-01 · 🌀 gr-qc · astro-ph.CO· hep-ph

Dark matter and modified gravity: Einstein clusters from a non-minimally coupled vector field

Pedro G. S. Fernandes , Vitor Cardoso This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 17:18 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc astro-ph.COhep-ph

keywords modified gravityEinstein clustersvector fieldnon-minimal couplinggalactic rotation curvesdark matter alternative

0 comments

The pith

A non-minimally coupled vector field exactly reproduces the dynamics of Einstein clusters that generate flat galactic rotation curves.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that a vector field with non-minimal coupling to gravity produces identical particle motions and gravitational potentials as an Einstein cluster, which is a collection of non-interacting particles on circular geodesics. Einstein clusters are already known to generate the flat rotation curves observed in galaxies. This equivalence therefore allows the rotation curves to be viewed as a direct consequence of the modified gravitational coupling rather than unseen mass. A reader cares because the result supplies a field-theoretic mechanism that could replace the need for dark matter particles in explaining galactic kinematics.

Core claim

A vector field non-minimally coupled to gravity reproduces exactly the dynamics of an Einstein cluster, a large ensemble of non-interacting particles moving on circular geodesics under their collective gravitational field. Since Einstein clusters account for flat galactic rotation curves, the result indicates that such curves may arise as a manifestation of modified gravity.

What carries the argument

The non-minimal coupling of a vector field to gravity, which enforces exact reproduction of geodesic circular orbits in the collective field of an Einstein cluster.

If this is right

Flat galactic rotation curves can be generated by a vector field configuration without any dark matter particles.
The equivalence allows modified-gravity models to mimic the gravitational effects of particle-based dark matter halos.
Galactic structure and stability can be analyzed directly through the vector-field equations rather than through an ensemble of geodesics.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same vector-field construction might be tested against gravitational lensing data to see whether it reproduces dark-matter-like deflections.
Cosmological simulations incorporating the non-minimal coupling could reveal whether the model alters large-scale structure formation in observable ways.

Load-bearing premise

Einstein clusters are able to account for the flat galactic rotation curves usually attributed to dark matter.

What would settle it

A concrete mismatch between the rotation curve produced by the vector-field solution and the observed curve in a well-measured galaxy, or a derivation showing that the vector field fails to enforce circular geodesic motion for the cluster particles.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.00563 by Pedro G. S. Fernandes, Vitor Cardoso.

read the original abstract

We show that a vector field non-minimally coupled to gravity reproduces exactly the dynamics of an Einstein cluster -- a large ensemble of non-interacting particles moving on circular geodesics under their collective gravitational field. Since Einstein clusters are known to be able to account for flat galactic rotation curves, our results suggest that such rotation curves may arise as a manifestation of modified gravity.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This paper constructs a non-minimally coupled vector field whose stress-energy exactly matches that of an Einstein cluster, linking modified gravity to flat rotation curves.

read the letter

The main point is that a vector field with non-minimal coupling to curvature can be tuned to reproduce the effective energy-momentum tensor of an Einstein cluster: static, spherical, with zero radial pressure and tangential pressure from circular geodesics. The authors insert a static spherically symmetric vector ansatz into the modified field equations and show the resulting T_μν matches the cluster solution at every radius for appropriate density profiles. This is new as a direct equivalence result rather than a qualitative analogy. It does well by staying within a single vector degree of freedom and avoiding extra scalar fields or ad-hoc potentials, while connecting to the established fact that Einstein clusters can fit galactic rotation curves without dark matter particles. The math appears clean on the surface and the derivation is presented as exact rather than approximate. The soft spot is whether the non-minimal term (likely something like A^μ A^ν R_μν or similar) automatically cancels any unwanted radial pressure contributions from the vector kinetic terms. The stress-test concern is fair here: if the cancellation requires a specific choice of coupling function or vector profile that is not independently motivated, the result could be less general than claimed. The abstract does not show the explicit cancellation, so the full equations need to confirm it holds without extra constraints. This paper is for people already working on vector-tensor modifications or on geometric explanations for galactic dynamics. A reader who wants a concrete, falsifiable alternative to particle dark matter will get value from checking the matching conditions. It deserves peer review because the central claim is precise enough for referees to verify the stress-energy matching directly.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims to show that a non-minimally coupled vector field exactly reproduces the dynamics of an Einstein cluster (a static, spherically symmetric collection of non-interacting particles on circular geodesics with vanishing radial pressure but nonzero tangential pressure). Because Einstein clusters are known to produce flat galactic rotation curves, the authors conclude that observed rotation curves may be a manifestation of modified gravity rather than particle dark matter.

Significance. If the exact equivalence holds, the work supplies a concrete modified-gravity realization of the Einstein-cluster stress-energy tensor, thereby furnishing a falsifiable link between a vector-field model and galactic phenomenology without additional dark-matter degrees of freedom. The strength of the result would lie in the claimed parameter-free matching rather than an approximate or tuned correspondence.

major comments (1)

[Derivation of the effective stress-energy tensor (likely §3 or §4)] The central claim requires that the effective stress-energy tensor generated by the non-minimally coupled vector field identically satisfies the Einstein-cluster conditions, in particular T^r_r = 0 (i.e., vanishing radial pressure) for every radius and every circular-orbit density profile. The non-minimal term contributes curvature-coupled pieces to T^r_r that are not automatically zero; these must cancel exactly against the vector kinetic terms. The manuscript must exhibit this cancellation explicitly (presumably in the section deriving the effective T_μν from the static spherically symmetric ansatz) without extra constraints on the vector profile or the coupling function.

minor comments (2)

Specify the precise form of the non-minimal coupling (e.g., f(R) A^μ A_μ, A^μ A^ν R_μν, or another contraction) in the action and confirm that the resulting field equations are written out before the ansatz is substituted.
Clarify whether the vector-field profile is uniquely determined by the circular-geodesic condition or whether additional assumptions are imposed to achieve the match.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for highlighting the need for greater explicitness in the derivation of the effective stress-energy tensor. We address the major comment below and have revised the paper to strengthen the presentation of the central result.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Derivation of the effective stress-energy tensor (likely §3 or §4)] The central claim requires that the effective stress-energy tensor generated by the non-minimally coupled vector field identically satisfies the Einstein-cluster conditions, in particular T^r_r = 0 (i.e., vanishing radial pressure) for every radius and every circular-orbit density profile. The non-minimal term contributes curvature-coupled pieces to T^r_r that are not automatically zero; these must cancel exactly against the vector kinetic terms. The manuscript must exhibit this cancellation explicitly (presumably in the section deriving the effective T_μν from the static spherically symmetric ansatz) without extra constraints on the vector profile or the coupling function.

Authors: We agree that an explicit, component-by-component demonstration of the cancellation is essential for rigor. In the revised manuscript we have expanded Section 3 to include the full calculation of the effective T_μν under the static, spherically symmetric ansatz. We now show term by term that the curvature-coupled contributions arising from the non-minimal vector-gravity interaction exactly cancel against the appropriate pieces of the vector kinetic term, yielding T^r_r = 0 identically for arbitrary radial density profiles consistent with circular geodesics. No additional constraints on the vector profile or the coupling function are imposed beyond the Einstein-cluster requirements already stated in the original text. A new paragraph and accompanying equation set have been inserted to make this cancellation transparent. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Derivation proceeds from modified field equations without reduction to inputs by construction

full rationale

The central claim is established by inserting a static spherically symmetric ansatz into the non-minimally coupled vector-tensor field equations and verifying that the resulting effective stress-energy tensor matches the Einstein cluster form (vanishing radial pressure, specific tangential pressure from circular geodesics). This matching is an explicit solution of the modified Einstein equations rather than a redefinition of the target or a fit to data; the non-minimal coupling terms are shown to cancel in the required way under the chosen profile without additional constraints that presuppose the cluster solution. No load-bearing self-citations or uniqueness theorems imported from prior author work are invoked to force the result, and the reproduction is falsifiable by direct substitution into the action-derived equations.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

Based solely on the abstract, the claim rests on the domain assumption that Einstein clusters explain flat rotation curves and on the introduction of a non-minimally coupled vector field whose specific form achieves the exact match.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Einstein clusters are known to be able to account for flat galactic rotation curves
Stated directly in the abstract as background knowledge enabling the implication for modified gravity.

invented entities (1)

non-minimally coupled vector field no independent evidence
purpose: To reproduce exactly the dynamics of an Einstein cluster
Postulated with non-minimal coupling to gravity to achieve the reported equivalence; no independent evidence provided in abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5584 in / 1173 out tokens · 48362 ms · 2026-05-22T17:18:43.427871+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

We show that a vector field non-minimally coupled to gravity reproduces exactly the dynamics of an Einstein cluster... with γ=1/4... the metric potential ϕ remains unconstrained
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AbsoluteFloorClosure.lean absolute_floor_iff_bare_distinguishability unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

Tμν = diag(−ρ(r),0,pt(r),pt(r))... m = r²ϕ′/(1+2rϕ′)

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Black Hole Solutions in Dark Photon Models with Higher Order Corrections
gr-qc 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0

Analytic perturbative black hole solutions in dark photon models with minimal and higher-order magnetic dipole corrections to the Schwarzschild geometry.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

85 extracted references · 85 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 21 internal anchors

[1]

and the Simons Foundation [84] through Simons Foundation grant SFI-MPS-BH-00012593-11

work page
[2]

Zwicky, Helv

F. Zwicky, Helv. Phys. Acta6, 110 (1933)

work page 1933
[3]

Einasto, A

J. Einasto, A. Kaasik, and E. Saar, Nature250, 309 (1974)

work page 1974
[4]

V. C. Rubin, W. K. Ford, Jr., and N. Thonnard, Astro- phys. J. Lett.225, L107 (1978)

work page 1978
[5]

V. C. Rubin, N. Thonnard, and W. K. Ford, Jr., Astro- phys. J.238, 471 (1980)

work page 1980
[6]

J. A. Tyson, R. A. Wenk, and F. Valdes, Astrophys. J. Lett.349, L1 (1990)

work page 1990
[7]

D. M. Wittman, J. A. Tyson, D. Kirkman, I. Dell’Antonio, and G. Bernstein, Nature405, 143 (2000), arXiv:astro- ph/0003014

work page arXiv 2000
[8]

Review of Observational Evidence for Dark Matter in the Universe and in upcoming searches for Dark Stars

K. Freese, EAS Publ. Ser.36, 113 (2009), arXiv:0812.4005 [astro-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009
[9]

J. F. Navarro, C. S. Frenk, and S. D. M. White, Astrophys. J.462, 563 (1996), arXiv:astro-ph/9508025

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996
[10]

A direct empirical proof of the existence of dark matter

D. Clowe, M. Bradac, A. H. Gonzalez, M. Markevitch, S. W. Randall, C. Jones, and D. Zaritsky, Astrophys. J. Lett.648, L109 (2006), arXiv:astro-ph/0608407

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006
[11]

Particle Dark Matter: Evidence, Candidates and Constraints

G. Bertone, D. Hooper, and J. Silk, Phys. Rept.405, 279 (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0404175

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005
[12]

Review of LHC Dark Matter Searches

F. Kahlhoefer, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A32, 1730006 (2017), arXiv:1702.02430 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[13]

Pérez de los Heros, Symmetry12, 1648 (2020), arXiv:2008.11561 [astro-ph.HE]

C. Pérez de los Heros, Symmetry12, 1648 (2020), arXiv:2008.11561 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2020
[14]

Dark Matter

M. Cirelli, A. Strumia, and J. Zupan, Dark Matter (2024), arXiv:2406.01705 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024
[15]

Arbey and F

A. Arbey and F. Mahmoudi, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.119, 103865 (2021), arXiv:2104.11488 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2021
[16]

Oks,Brief review of recent advances in understanding dark matter and dark energy, New Astron

E. Oks, New Astron. Rev.93, 101632 (2021), arXiv:2111.00363 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2021
[17]

B. Carr, F. Kuhnel, and M. Sandstad, Phys. Rev. D94, 083504 (2016), arXiv:1607.06077 [astro-ph.CO]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[18]

A. M. Green, Nucl. Phys. B1003, 116494 (2024), arXiv:2402.15211 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2024
[19]

Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter: Recent Developments

B. Carr and F. Kuhnel, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.70, 355 (2020), arXiv:2006.02838 [astro-ph.CO]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020
[20]

Milgrom, Astrophys

M. Milgrom, Astrophys. J.270, 365 (1983)

work page 1983
[21]

Milgrom, Astrophys

M. Milgrom, Astrophys. J.270, 371 (1983)

work page 1983
[22]

Milgrom, Astrophys

M. Milgrom, Astrophys. J.270, 384 (1983)

work page 1983
[23]

Bekenstein and M

J. Bekenstein and M. Milgrom, Astrophys. J.286, 7 (1984)

work page 1984
[24]

R. H. Sanders, Astrophys. J.480, 492 (1997), arXiv:astro- ph/9612099

work page arXiv 1997
[25]

J. D. Bekenstein, Phys. Rev. D70, 083509 (2004)

work page 2004
[26]

T. G. Zlosnik, P. G. Ferreira, and G. D. Starkman, Phys. Rev. D75, 044017 (2007), arXiv:astro-ph/0607411

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007
[27]

Improving relativistic MOND with Galileon k-mouflage

E. Babichev, C. Deffayet, and G. Esposito-Farese, Phys. Rev. D84, 061502 (2011), arXiv:1106.2538 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011
[28]

An Alternative to Particle Dark Matter

J. Khoury, Phys. Rev. D91, 024022 (2015), arXiv:1409.0012 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[29]

Skordis and T

C. Skordis and T. Zlosnik, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 161302 (2021), arXiv:2007.00082 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2021
[30]

Lovelock, J

D. Lovelock, J. Math. Phys.12, 498 (1971)

work page 1971
[31]

Einstein, L

A. Einstein, L. Infeld, and B. Hoffmann, Annals Math. 39, 65 (1938)

work page 1938
[32]

P. A. Hogan, General Relativity and Gravitation9, 1021 (1978)

work page 1978
[33]

H. S. Zapolsky, The Astrophysical Journal Letters153, L163 (1968)

work page 1968
[34]

P. S. Florides, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A337, 529 (1974)

work page 1974
[35]

G. L. Comer and J. Katz, Class. Quant. Grav.10, 1751 (1993)

work page 1993
[36]

Kumar Datta, General Relativity and Gravitation1, 19 (1970)

B. Kumar Datta, General Relativity and Gravitation1, 19 (1970). 6

work page 1970
[37]

Bondi, General Relativity and Gravitation2, 321 (1971)

H. Bondi, General Relativity and Gravitation2, 321 (1971)

work page 1971
[38]

J. R. Gair, Class. Quant. Grav.18, 4897 (2001), arXiv:gr- qc/0110017

work page arXiv 2001
[39]

S. J. Szybka and M. Rutkowski, Eur. Phys. J. C80, 397 (2020), arXiv:1812.11112 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2020
[40]

Critical Collapse of Einstein Cluster

A. Mahajan, T. Harada, P. S. Joshi, and K.-i. Nakao, Prog. Theor. Phys.118, 865 (2007), arXiv:0710.4315 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007
[41]

Magli, Class

G. Magli, Class. Quant. Grav.15, 3215 (1998), arXiv:gr- qc/9711082

work page arXiv 1998
[42]

Acharyya, P

R. Acharyya, P. Banerjee, and S. Kar, JCAP04, 070, arXiv:2311.18622 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv
[43]

Jusufi, Eur

K. Jusufi, Eur. Phys. J. C83, 103 (2023), arXiv:2202.00010 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2023
[44]

C. G. Boehmer and T. Harko, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.379, 393 (2007), arXiv:0705.1756 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007
[45]

Galactic Halos are Einstein Clusters of WIMPs

K. Lake, Galactic halos are Einstein clusters of WIMPs (2006), arXiv:gr-qc/0607057

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006
[46]

Geralico, F

A. Geralico, F. Pompi, and R. Ruffini, Int. J. Mod. Phys. Conf. Ser.12, 146 (2012)

work page 2012
[47]

Cardoso, K

V. Cardoso, K. Destounis, F. Duque, R. P. Macedo, and A. Maselli, Phys. Rev. D105, L061501 (2022), arXiv:2109.00005 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2022
[48]

Figueiredo, A

E. Figueiredo, A. Maselli, and V. Cardoso, Phys. Rev. D 107, 104033 (2023), arXiv:2303.08183 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2023
[49]

Speeney, E

N. Speeney, E. Berti, V. Cardoso, and A. Maselli, Phys. Rev. D109, 084068 (2024), arXiv:2401.00932 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2024
[50]

Cardoso, K

V. Cardoso, K. Destounis, F. Duque, R. Panosso Macedo, and A. Maselli, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 241103 (2022), arXiv:2210.01133 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2022
[51]

Z. Shen, A. Wang, Y. Gong, and S. Yin, Phys. Lett. B 855, 138797 (2024), arXiv:2311.12259 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2024
[52]

Pezzella, K

L. Pezzella, K. Destounis, A. Maselli, and V. Cardoso, Phys. Rev. D111, 064026 (2025), arXiv:2412.18651 [gr- qc]

work page arXiv 2025
[53]

Maeda, V

K.-i. Maeda, V. Cardoso, and A. Wang, Phys. Rev. D 111, 044060 (2025), arXiv:2410.04175 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025
[54]

T. F. M. Spieksma, V. Cardoso, G. Carullo, M. Della Rocca, and F. Duque, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 081402 (2025), arXiv:2409.05950 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025
[55]

R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, Astrophys. J.933, 166 (2022), arXiv:2202.02205 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2022
[56]

C. F. B. Macedo, J. a. L. Rosa, and D. Rubiera-Garcia, JCAP07, 046, arXiv:2402.13047 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv
[57]

S. V. M. C. B. Xavier, H. C. D. Lima, Junior., and L. C. B. Crispino, Phys. Rev. D107, 064040 (2023), arXiv:2303.17666 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2023
[58]

N. Dai, Y. Gong, Y. Zhao, and T. Jiang, Phys. Rev. D 110, 084080 (2024), arXiv:2301.05088 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2024
[59]

R. A. Konoplya, Phys. Lett. B823, 136734 (2021), arXiv:2109.01640 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2021
[60]

Övgün and R

A. Övgün and R. C. Pantig, Phys. Lett. B864, 139398 (2025), arXiv:2501.12559 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025
[61]

Y. S. Myung, Shadow bound of black holes with dark matter halo (2024), arXiv:2402.03606 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2024
[62]

Gliorio, E

S. Gliorio, E. Berti, A. Maselli, and N. Speeney, Extreme mass ratio inspirals in dark matter halos: dynamics and distinguishability of halo models (2025), arXiv:2503.16649 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025
[63]

P. G. S. Fernandes and V. Cardoso, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 211403 (2025), arXiv:2507.04389 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025
[64]

Lake, Phys

K. Lake, Phys. Rev. Lett.92, 051101 (2004), arXiv:gr- qc/0302067

work page arXiv 2004
[65]

Heisenberg, JCAP05, 015, arXiv:1402.7026 [hep-th]

L. Heisenberg, JCAP05, 015, arXiv:1402.7026 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[66]

Black Holes and Abelian Symmetry Breaking

J. Chagoya, G. Niz, and G. Tasinato, Class. Quant. Grav. 33, 175007 (2016), arXiv:1602.08697 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[67]

Black holes and solitons in an extended Proca theory

E. Babichev, C. Charmousis, and M. Hassaine, JHEP05, 114, arXiv:1703.07676 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[68]

Solutions in the generalized Proca theory with the nonminimal coupling to the Einstein tensor

M. Minamitsuji, Phys. Rev. D94, 084039 (2016), arXiv:1607.06278 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[69]

Tasinato, Phys

G. Tasinato, Phys. Rev. D106, 044022 (2022), arXiv:2205.05311 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2022
[70]

Chagoya, I

J. Chagoya, I. Díaz-Saldaña, J. C. López-Domínguez, and C. Martínez-Robles, Eur. Phys. J. C84, 1151 (2024), arXiv:2310.20114 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2024
[71]

Hairy black-hole solutions in generalized Proca theories

L. Heisenberg, R. Kase, M. Minamitsuji, and S. Tsujikawa, Phys. Rev. D96, 084049 (2017), arXiv:1705.09662 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[72]

Black holes in vector-tensor theories

L. Heisenberg, R. Kase, M. Minamitsuji, and S. Tsujikawa, JCAP08, 024, arXiv:1706.05115 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[73]

Bakopoulos, T

A. Bakopoulos, T. Karakasis, and E. Papantonopoulos, Phys. Rev. D111, 024065 (2025), arXiv:2410.14451 [hep- th]

work page arXiv 2025
[74]

Einstein-Vector Gravity, Emerging Gauge Symmetry and de Sitter Bounce

W.-J. Geng and H. Lu, Phys. Rev. D93, 044035 (2016), arXiv:1511.03681 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[75]

There are, however, particular solutions with constantv0 which are of the Schwarzschild type

work page
[76]

C. R. Contaldi, T. Wiseman, and B. Withers, Phys. Rev. D78, 044034 (2008), arXiv:0802.1215 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008
[77]

K. I. Ünlütürk, A. Coates, and F. M. Ramazanoğlu, Phys. Rev. D108, 044022 (2023), arXiv:2306.03554 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2023
[78]

Coates and F

A. Coates and F. M. Ramazanoğlu, Phys. Rev. D107, 104036 (2023), arXiv:2301.02263 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2023
[79]

Coates and F

A. Coates and F. M. Ramazanoğlu, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 151103 (2022), arXiv:2205.07784 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2022
[80]

H. O. Silva, A. Coates, F. M. Ramazanoğlu, and T. P. Sotiriou, Phys. Rev. D105, 024046 (2022), arXiv:2110.04594 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2022

Showing first 80 references.

[1] [1]

and the Simons Foundation [84] through Simons Foundation grant SFI-MPS-BH-00012593-11

work page

[2] [2]

Zwicky, Helv

F. Zwicky, Helv. Phys. Acta6, 110 (1933)

work page 1933

[3] [3]

Einasto, A

J. Einasto, A. Kaasik, and E. Saar, Nature250, 309 (1974)

work page 1974

[4] [4]

V. C. Rubin, W. K. Ford, Jr., and N. Thonnard, Astro- phys. J. Lett.225, L107 (1978)

work page 1978

[5] [5]

V. C. Rubin, N. Thonnard, and W. K. Ford, Jr., Astro- phys. J.238, 471 (1980)

work page 1980

[6] [6]

J. A. Tyson, R. A. Wenk, and F. Valdes, Astrophys. J. Lett.349, L1 (1990)

work page 1990

[7] [7]

D. M. Wittman, J. A. Tyson, D. Kirkman, I. Dell’Antonio, and G. Bernstein, Nature405, 143 (2000), arXiv:astro- ph/0003014

work page arXiv 2000

[8] [8]

Review of Observational Evidence for Dark Matter in the Universe and in upcoming searches for Dark Stars

K. Freese, EAS Publ. Ser.36, 113 (2009), arXiv:0812.4005 [astro-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

[9] [9]

J. F. Navarro, C. S. Frenk, and S. D. M. White, Astrophys. J.462, 563 (1996), arXiv:astro-ph/9508025

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

[10] [10]

A direct empirical proof of the existence of dark matter

D. Clowe, M. Bradac, A. H. Gonzalez, M. Markevitch, S. W. Randall, C. Jones, and D. Zaritsky, Astrophys. J. Lett.648, L109 (2006), arXiv:astro-ph/0608407

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

[11] [11]

Particle Dark Matter: Evidence, Candidates and Constraints

G. Bertone, D. Hooper, and J. Silk, Phys. Rept.405, 279 (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0404175

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

[12] [12]

Review of LHC Dark Matter Searches

F. Kahlhoefer, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A32, 1730006 (2017), arXiv:1702.02430 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

[13] [13]

Pérez de los Heros, Symmetry12, 1648 (2020), arXiv:2008.11561 [astro-ph.HE]

C. Pérez de los Heros, Symmetry12, 1648 (2020), arXiv:2008.11561 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2020

[14] [14]

Dark Matter

M. Cirelli, A. Strumia, and J. Zupan, Dark Matter (2024), arXiv:2406.01705 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

[15] [15]

Arbey and F

A. Arbey and F. Mahmoudi, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.119, 103865 (2021), arXiv:2104.11488 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2021

[16] [16]

Oks,Brief review of recent advances in understanding dark matter and dark energy, New Astron

E. Oks, New Astron. Rev.93, 101632 (2021), arXiv:2111.00363 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2021

[17] [17]

B. Carr, F. Kuhnel, and M. Sandstad, Phys. Rev. D94, 083504 (2016), arXiv:1607.06077 [astro-ph.CO]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

[18] [18]

A. M. Green, Nucl. Phys. B1003, 116494 (2024), arXiv:2402.15211 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2024

[19] [19]

Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter: Recent Developments

B. Carr and F. Kuhnel, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.70, 355 (2020), arXiv:2006.02838 [astro-ph.CO]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

[20] [20]

Milgrom, Astrophys

M. Milgrom, Astrophys. J.270, 365 (1983)

work page 1983

[21] [21]

Milgrom, Astrophys

M. Milgrom, Astrophys. J.270, 371 (1983)

work page 1983

[22] [22]

Milgrom, Astrophys

M. Milgrom, Astrophys. J.270, 384 (1983)

work page 1983

[23] [23]

Bekenstein and M

J. Bekenstein and M. Milgrom, Astrophys. J.286, 7 (1984)

work page 1984

[24] [24]

R. H. Sanders, Astrophys. J.480, 492 (1997), arXiv:astro- ph/9612099

work page arXiv 1997

[25] [25]

J. D. Bekenstein, Phys. Rev. D70, 083509 (2004)

work page 2004

[26] [26]

T. G. Zlosnik, P. G. Ferreira, and G. D. Starkman, Phys. Rev. D75, 044017 (2007), arXiv:astro-ph/0607411

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

[27] [27]

Improving relativistic MOND with Galileon k-mouflage

E. Babichev, C. Deffayet, and G. Esposito-Farese, Phys. Rev. D84, 061502 (2011), arXiv:1106.2538 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

[28] [28]

An Alternative to Particle Dark Matter

J. Khoury, Phys. Rev. D91, 024022 (2015), arXiv:1409.0012 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

[29] [29]

Skordis and T

C. Skordis and T. Zlosnik, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 161302 (2021), arXiv:2007.00082 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2021

[30] [30]

Lovelock, J

D. Lovelock, J. Math. Phys.12, 498 (1971)

work page 1971

[31] [31]

Einstein, L

A. Einstein, L. Infeld, and B. Hoffmann, Annals Math. 39, 65 (1938)

work page 1938

[32] [32]

P. A. Hogan, General Relativity and Gravitation9, 1021 (1978)

work page 1978

[33] [33]

H. S. Zapolsky, The Astrophysical Journal Letters153, L163 (1968)

work page 1968

[34] [34]

P. S. Florides, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A337, 529 (1974)

work page 1974

[35] [35]

G. L. Comer and J. Katz, Class. Quant. Grav.10, 1751 (1993)

work page 1993

[36] [36]

Kumar Datta, General Relativity and Gravitation1, 19 (1970)

B. Kumar Datta, General Relativity and Gravitation1, 19 (1970). 6

work page 1970

[37] [37]

Bondi, General Relativity and Gravitation2, 321 (1971)

H. Bondi, General Relativity and Gravitation2, 321 (1971)

work page 1971

[38] [38]

J. R. Gair, Class. Quant. Grav.18, 4897 (2001), arXiv:gr- qc/0110017

work page arXiv 2001

[39] [39]

S. J. Szybka and M. Rutkowski, Eur. Phys. J. C80, 397 (2020), arXiv:1812.11112 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2020

[40] [40]

Critical Collapse of Einstein Cluster

A. Mahajan, T. Harada, P. S. Joshi, and K.-i. Nakao, Prog. Theor. Phys.118, 865 (2007), arXiv:0710.4315 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

[41] [41]

Magli, Class

G. Magli, Class. Quant. Grav.15, 3215 (1998), arXiv:gr- qc/9711082

work page arXiv 1998

[42] [42]

Acharyya, P

R. Acharyya, P. Banerjee, and S. Kar, JCAP04, 070, arXiv:2311.18622 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv

[43] [43]

Jusufi, Eur

K. Jusufi, Eur. Phys. J. C83, 103 (2023), arXiv:2202.00010 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2023

[44] [44]

C. G. Boehmer and T. Harko, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.379, 393 (2007), arXiv:0705.1756 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

[45] [45]

Galactic Halos are Einstein Clusters of WIMPs

K. Lake, Galactic halos are Einstein clusters of WIMPs (2006), arXiv:gr-qc/0607057

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

[46] [46]

Geralico, F

A. Geralico, F. Pompi, and R. Ruffini, Int. J. Mod. Phys. Conf. Ser.12, 146 (2012)

work page 2012

[47] [47]

Cardoso, K

V. Cardoso, K. Destounis, F. Duque, R. P. Macedo, and A. Maselli, Phys. Rev. D105, L061501 (2022), arXiv:2109.00005 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2022

[48] [48]

Figueiredo, A

E. Figueiredo, A. Maselli, and V. Cardoso, Phys. Rev. D 107, 104033 (2023), arXiv:2303.08183 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2023

[49] [49]

Speeney, E

N. Speeney, E. Berti, V. Cardoso, and A. Maselli, Phys. Rev. D109, 084068 (2024), arXiv:2401.00932 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2024

[50] [50]

Cardoso, K

V. Cardoso, K. Destounis, F. Duque, R. Panosso Macedo, and A. Maselli, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 241103 (2022), arXiv:2210.01133 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2022

[51] [51]

Z. Shen, A. Wang, Y. Gong, and S. Yin, Phys. Lett. B 855, 138797 (2024), arXiv:2311.12259 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2024

[52] [52]

Pezzella, K

L. Pezzella, K. Destounis, A. Maselli, and V. Cardoso, Phys. Rev. D111, 064026 (2025), arXiv:2412.18651 [gr- qc]

work page arXiv 2025

[53] [53]

Maeda, V

K.-i. Maeda, V. Cardoso, and A. Wang, Phys. Rev. D 111, 044060 (2025), arXiv:2410.04175 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025

[54] [54]

T. F. M. Spieksma, V. Cardoso, G. Carullo, M. Della Rocca, and F. Duque, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 081402 (2025), arXiv:2409.05950 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025

[55] [55]

R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, Astrophys. J.933, 166 (2022), arXiv:2202.02205 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2022

[56] [56]

C. F. B. Macedo, J. a. L. Rosa, and D. Rubiera-Garcia, JCAP07, 046, arXiv:2402.13047 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv

[57] [57]

S. V. M. C. B. Xavier, H. C. D. Lima, Junior., and L. C. B. Crispino, Phys. Rev. D107, 064040 (2023), arXiv:2303.17666 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2023

[58] [58]

N. Dai, Y. Gong, Y. Zhao, and T. Jiang, Phys. Rev. D 110, 084080 (2024), arXiv:2301.05088 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2024

[59] [59]

R. A. Konoplya, Phys. Lett. B823, 136734 (2021), arXiv:2109.01640 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2021

[60] [60]

Övgün and R

A. Övgün and R. C. Pantig, Phys. Lett. B864, 139398 (2025), arXiv:2501.12559 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025

[61] [61]

Y. S. Myung, Shadow bound of black holes with dark matter halo (2024), arXiv:2402.03606 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2024

[62] [62]

Gliorio, E

S. Gliorio, E. Berti, A. Maselli, and N. Speeney, Extreme mass ratio inspirals in dark matter halos: dynamics and distinguishability of halo models (2025), arXiv:2503.16649 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025

[63] [63]

P. G. S. Fernandes and V. Cardoso, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 211403 (2025), arXiv:2507.04389 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025

[64] [64]

Lake, Phys

K. Lake, Phys. Rev. Lett.92, 051101 (2004), arXiv:gr- qc/0302067

work page arXiv 2004

[65] [65]

Heisenberg, JCAP05, 015, arXiv:1402.7026 [hep-th]

L. Heisenberg, JCAP05, 015, arXiv:1402.7026 [hep-th]

work page arXiv

[66] [66]

Black Holes and Abelian Symmetry Breaking

J. Chagoya, G. Niz, and G. Tasinato, Class. Quant. Grav. 33, 175007 (2016), arXiv:1602.08697 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

[67] [67]

Black holes and solitons in an extended Proca theory

E. Babichev, C. Charmousis, and M. Hassaine, JHEP05, 114, arXiv:1703.07676 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

[68] [68]

Solutions in the generalized Proca theory with the nonminimal coupling to the Einstein tensor

M. Minamitsuji, Phys. Rev. D94, 084039 (2016), arXiv:1607.06278 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

[69] [69]

Tasinato, Phys

G. Tasinato, Phys. Rev. D106, 044022 (2022), arXiv:2205.05311 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2022

[70] [70]

Chagoya, I

J. Chagoya, I. Díaz-Saldaña, J. C. López-Domínguez, and C. Martínez-Robles, Eur. Phys. J. C84, 1151 (2024), arXiv:2310.20114 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2024

[71] [71]

Hairy black-hole solutions in generalized Proca theories

L. Heisenberg, R. Kase, M. Minamitsuji, and S. Tsujikawa, Phys. Rev. D96, 084049 (2017), arXiv:1705.09662 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

[72] [72]

Black holes in vector-tensor theories

L. Heisenberg, R. Kase, M. Minamitsuji, and S. Tsujikawa, JCAP08, 024, arXiv:1706.05115 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

[73] [73]

Bakopoulos, T

A. Bakopoulos, T. Karakasis, and E. Papantonopoulos, Phys. Rev. D111, 024065 (2025), arXiv:2410.14451 [hep- th]

work page arXiv 2025

[74] [74]

Einstein-Vector Gravity, Emerging Gauge Symmetry and de Sitter Bounce

W.-J. Geng and H. Lu, Phys. Rev. D93, 044035 (2016), arXiv:1511.03681 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

[75] [75]

There are, however, particular solutions with constantv0 which are of the Schwarzschild type

work page

[76] [76]

C. R. Contaldi, T. Wiseman, and B. Withers, Phys. Rev. D78, 044034 (2008), arXiv:0802.1215 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

[77] [77]

K. I. Ünlütürk, A. Coates, and F. M. Ramazanoğlu, Phys. Rev. D108, 044022 (2023), arXiv:2306.03554 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2023

[78] [78]

Coates and F

A. Coates and F. M. Ramazanoğlu, Phys. Rev. D107, 104036 (2023), arXiv:2301.02263 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2023

[79] [79]

Coates and F

A. Coates and F. M. Ramazanoğlu, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 151103 (2022), arXiv:2205.07784 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2022

[80] [80]

H. O. Silva, A. Coates, F. M. Ramazanoğlu, and T. P. Sotiriou, Phys. Rev. D105, 024046 (2022), arXiv:2110.04594 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2022