{"as_of":"2026-08-17T04:04:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:956014931165df2569560b6e97f23ff5107aa1057ff97024982cbb99fa17c6da","coverage":[{"denominator":52,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":52,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.427711Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":52,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":52,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":0,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"cited_works","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2505.03454/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2505.03454/integrity","json":"/paper/2505.03454/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2505.03454"},"outbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.273709Z","title":"Charpak et al","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":1968},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.03454","last_updated":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:40:04.671630Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","title":"Simulation-based performance comparison of varied pitch sizes GEM detectors","version":1},"reference_index":1,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.273709Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.03454"},"observation_digest":"sha256:722d27a20126ffbab756f38b2ca44ca6fdcd43c06891cb298a9d5abbde86c822","observation_id":"03e8215b-ddd1-4954-aec3-66da31ba63b7","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.273709Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.278279Z","title":"Sauli (2016), Nucl","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2016},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.03454","last_updated":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:40:04.671630Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","title":"Simulation-based performance comparison of varied pitch sizes GEM detectors","version":1},"reference_index":2,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.278279Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.03454"},"observation_digest":"sha256:64b3709e3f51bd19398f5b239d9ab18ab96857803648435e5100ab563a5ef3e6","observation_id":"3999181b-c1cc-4e9b-8ccd-2189b6c26090","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.278279Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.281391Z","title":"Oed, Nucl","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":1988},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.03454","last_updated":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:40:04.671630Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","title":"Simulation-based performance comparison of varied pitch sizes GEM detectors","version":1},"reference_index":3,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.281391Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.03454"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a9a40e4b23a97ba4ecba38908810b57e506de667470d285ae28104786b37138f","observation_id":"c2e110d5-62e6-43f8-9d2d-fec4d2b8d017","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.281391Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"malformed_identifier"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":"10.1109/23.775537","metadata_source":"doi_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.603275Z","title":"Fonte et al., IEEE Trans","venue":null,"work_id":"12a86fe0-8f90-446e-8baf-91697a60e802","year":1999},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.03454","last_updated":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:40:04.671630Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","title":"Simulation-based performance comparison of varied pitch sizes GEM detectors","version":1},"reference_index":4,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.285000Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.03454"},"observation_digest":"sha256:258206c0b35f3c26c264d2060c59a0656bed431e72b90fea8873d37681fa681a","observation_id":"e2200765-a13d-4080-a91d-673df16c95e5","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.606936Z","resolver_source":"doi","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:07.203719Z","title":"CSEM meeting presentation,","venue":null,"work_id":"94893d4b-c443-404e-aee7-4513f6f316d0","year":2013},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.03454","last_updated":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:40:04.671630Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","title":"Simulation-based performance comparison of varied pitch sizes GEM detectors","version":1},"reference_index":5,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.289387Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.03454"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b47b2187ddb01426c868ed3f659bec544c9b71693bcf1ad0e90546a099549bf1","observation_id":"5ef21614-d92b-4a01-9112-3effeec41ef4","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:07.206210Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":"10.1016/s0168-9002(01)01713-2","metadata_source":"doi_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.592873Z","title":"Charpak et al., Nucl","venue":null,"work_id":"32ea1dbe-4c77-477c-90fa-98ef31207b84","year":2002},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.03454","last_updated":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:40:04.671630Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","title":"Simulation-based performance comparison of varied pitch sizes GEM detectors","version":1},"reference_index":6,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.293027Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.03454"},"observation_digest":"sha256:10945dc42e90dbe769ec2879554833a8e4abd5e01e078b61798e7436f8cf2715","observation_id":"054f5a96-fdc9-4268-9650-3c8eadafc229","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.596696Z","resolver_source":"doi","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":"10.1016/s0920-5632(99)00582-4","metadata_source":"doi_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.584046Z","title":"Sarvestani et al., Nucl","venue":null,"work_id":"569a57ec-8029-486a-8aad-ddfd10883bd7","year":1999},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.03454","last_updated":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:40:04.671630Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","title":"Simulation-based performance comparison of varied pitch sizes GEM detectors","version":1},"reference_index":7,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.297128Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.03454"},"observation_digest":"sha256:75877cc212f8ad0c494b84efade6db5e4e81b1cef644cd2c42d5339b28310acd","observation_id":"53f31088-ce4a-4ac2-b346-26e6874830af","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.587047Z","resolver_source":"doi","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.300226Z","title":"Charpak and F","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":1978},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.03454","last_updated":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:40:04.671630Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","title":"Simulation-based performance comparison of varied pitch sizes GEM detectors","version":1},"reference_index":8,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.300226Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.03454"},"observation_digest":"sha256:36b0028556da00688db1e105c689f70e40e69758340082351ee4dde829b16327","observation_id":"679940fa-bf31-44ae-8218-66df4cf010a5","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.300226Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"malformed_identifier"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.304282Z","title":"Sauli, Nucl","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":1997},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.03454","last_updated":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:40:04.671630Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","title":"Simulation-based performance comparison of varied pitch sizes GEM detectors","version":1},"reference_index":9,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.304282Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.03454"},"observation_digest":"sha256:750490bce49824b883e9cec23a2e19675dcc9562e4d0fe7b73920117ea459bdc","observation_id":"f6ee23f5-413e-4a83-a204-9a7f41d18332","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.304282Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"malformed_identifier"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":"10.1016/s0168-9002(99)00820-7","metadata_source":"doi_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.567311Z","title":"Bachmann et al., Nucl","venue":null,"work_id":"9d88cdf5-8da5-4456-bee3-e7f339e540ca","year":1999},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.03454","last_updated":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:40:04.671630Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","title":"Simulation-based performance comparison of varied pitch sizes GEM detectors","version":1},"reference_index":10,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.307809Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.03454"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c6b739a1d0ab205fe1a475a91bf6c5b8be2eee71853e3408e840d8b21003226b","observation_id":"fa797a3a-2106-41c0-ab52-951e067de8ac","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.569742Z","resolver_source":"doi","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":"10.1088/1748-0221/20/04/t04011","metadata_source":"doi_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.558958Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"6e46fdaa-6fe6-491b-9938-f9e7b497f2ba","year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.03454","last_updated":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:40:04.671630Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","title":"Simulation-based performance comparison of varied pitch sizes GEM detectors","version":1},"reference_index":11,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.310160Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.03454"},"observation_digest":"sha256:16b08051a8269c9b81351073848e12e531dbe6df54c0178ee515da74ef0efccf","observation_id":"cec9566f-541e-46c8-8970-0be09a0b89a3","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.561407Z","resolver_source":"doi","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":"10.1016/j.nima.2004.03.053","metadata_source":"doi_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.551232Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"5ce3c5ba-cc64-4506-a3ad-768a691a9069","year":2004},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.03454","last_updated":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:40:04.671630Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","title":"Simulation-based performance comparison of varied pitch sizes GEM detectors","version":1},"reference_index":12,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.313304Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.03454"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a9bcae8e67c752c2283cabb63bee8d514e540799850c6d060767cc7c0ffc200e","observation_id":"b7feb299-c5d4-41a6-b329-f0e68b2c1c23","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.554173Z","resolver_source":"doi","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1604.02899","last_updated":"2016-06-02T17:57:02Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T22:02:15.473519Z","submitted_at":"2016-04-11T11:48:27Z","title":"Performance of a large size triple GEM detector at high particle rate for CBM Experiment at FAIR","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"1604.02899","doi":null,"metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"1604.02899","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:07.076286Z","title":"Performance of a large size triple GEM detector at high particle rate for CBM Experiment at FAIR","venue":"physics.ins-det","work_id":"ed669dfa-02f6-445a-a2cf-451d70f22f3a","year":2016},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.03454","last_updated":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:40:04.671630Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","title":"Simulation-based performance comparison of varied pitch sizes GEM detectors","version":1},"reference_index":13,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.316736Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/1604.02899","citing_paper":"/paper/2505.03454"},"observation_digest":"sha256:6193a2c2f251b68425406052c83611f13b5a37c2c66f8dd00bc36cd1a6c3187a","observation_id":"63d1b0c6-aaa2-4769-bc18-f973e71412c9","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:07.080019Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":"10.1016/s0168-9002(01)01801-0","metadata_source":"doi_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.544020Z","title":"Tikhonov and R","venue":null,"work_id":"790e2035-c04c-429a-88b4-a231383b980e","year":2002},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.03454","last_updated":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:40:04.671630Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","title":"Simulation-based performance comparison of varied pitch sizes GEM detectors","version":1},"reference_index":14,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.319764Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.03454"},"observation_digest":"sha256:01de508b22c0bc003ac0ccaf15bdffcf9449992e54d014e51ac069b6f64cb5e7","observation_id":"746c296a-93a5-4d35-9527-7d8992b86748","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.546405Z","resolver_source":"doi","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":"10.1088/1748-0221/20/02/c02003","metadata_source":"doi_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.536757Z","title":"Buonsante et al","venue":null,"work_id":"49a8b9c2-8425-4219-936a-99f8d31fa632","year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.03454","last_updated":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:40:04.671630Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","title":"Simulation-based performance comparison of varied pitch sizes GEM detectors","version":1},"reference_index":15,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.322158Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.03454"},"observation_digest":"sha256:44378d537d796ac19a7f17b4a2ba1ac19df775324908429939f2c7d1a922286d","observation_id":"1728a5ab-4867-42c4-8b02-49c6f23b518c","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.539333Z","resolver_source":"doi","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":"10.1016/j.nima.2004.07.146","metadata_source":"doi_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.529551Z","title":"Ketzer et al., Nucl","venue":null,"work_id":"9e8171d1-ed41-4df1-a339-56f99b0bbaa2","year":2004},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.03454","last_updated":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:40:04.671630Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","title":"Simulation-based performance comparison of varied pitch sizes GEM detectors","version":1},"reference_index":16,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.324530Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.03454"},"observation_digest":"sha256:76693d16bcc4b356b611a860c198b9f1612d07d709ec7094f3daec94a3a11dc6","observation_id":"3de120e4-bf8a-452f-a3f3-ce8687d879b2","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.532278Z","resolver_source":"doi","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[{"edge_observation":{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:31:05.678032+00:00","source":"paper_reference_links","state":"open"},"event_date":"2011-07-22","event_type":"correction","notice_doi":"10.1016/j.nima.2011.06.028","provenance":{"observed_at":"2026-07-11T03:10:43.721493+00:00","source":"crossref","source_record_id":"10.1016/j.nima.2011.06.028->10.1016/j.nima.2004.07.146:correction"}}],"reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.327714Z","title":"Simon et al., doi:10.1109 /NSSMIC.2008.4774682 [arXiv:0811.2432 [physics.ins-det]]","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2008},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.03454","last_updated":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:40:04.671630Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","title":"Simulation-based performance comparison of varied pitch sizes GEM detectors","version":1},"reference_index":17,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.327714Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.03454"},"observation_digest":"sha256:80abc95ba61e301b59431388c1bf2b9cfe5132759bd40ef5359ddc210d9ead62","observation_id":"71010824-c3e6-4575-8314-fc95012a97ca","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.327714Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"malformed_identifier"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.330437Z","title":"Azmoun et al., IEEE Trans","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.03454","last_updated":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:40:04.671630Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","title":"Simulation-based performance comparison of varied pitch sizes GEM detectors","version":1},"reference_index":18,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.330437Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.03454"},"observation_digest":"sha256:12325e8d687f06db6520712019731883f7fcdbec2788aab054fa90149387e792","observation_id":"60873ce6-4560-4eaa-8630-6d3883e13023","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.330437Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:07.195897Z","title":"Hoepfner et al.[CMS Muon], Nucl","venue":null,"work_id":"25774e98-2948-4f6d-9ee4-c9884f53964b","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.03454","last_updated":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:40:04.671630Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","title":"Simulation-based performance comparison of varied pitch sizes GEM detectors","version":1},"reference_index":19,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.333327Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.03454"},"observation_digest":"sha256:2cd41c0752388997871a5824e8c7573bfd2c13a96d27dd26e5b04ada49cdee93","observation_id":"f8030f07-7cc2-49f9-9834-d872600eb55c","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:07.198775Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:07.187885Z","title":"Abdul Khalek et al., Nucl","venue":null,"work_id":"0da0986e-ff8e-4e78-b003-fb26d3fb8f7e","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.03454","last_updated":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:40:04.671630Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","title":"Simulation-based performance comparison of varied pitch sizes GEM detectors","version":1},"reference_index":20,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.336721Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.03454"},"observation_digest":"sha256:aeb25731264cd682270080422de765d2c1871c7b879eb7beb8de3437b2a9b035","observation_id":"1e04ac9c-9351-4e67-866d-473c4e599631","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:07.190955Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2406.05836","doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.947797Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"2a3c09ae-aa7d-4061-b0ee-4f5c5a7e993b","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.03454","last_updated":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:40:04.671630Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","title":"Simulation-based performance comparison of varied pitch sizes GEM detectors","version":1},"reference_index":21,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.340453Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.03454"},"observation_digest":"sha256:1c9a16f29f32edf269a74e8e7bc209707d19fd57c9a7c1fd68c438075069dd7c","observation_id":"e1386e12-9a01-4358-b684-cab24b6dd456","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.951552Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"malformed_identifier"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"record/2869182","doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.873182Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"1b7bef3f-8a3f-4df8-ba6a-0c40717e839e","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.03454","last_updated":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:40:04.671630Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","title":"Simulation-based performance comparison of varied pitch sizes GEM detectors","version":1},"reference_index":22,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.343280Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.03454"},"observation_digest":"sha256:4ec7801338d251461de433334c4b23360287fab372a38908e366d0f9b576b88f","observation_id":"468379c8-1536-4d06-bb8b-f410a1e8f78a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.877027Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"event/1295773","doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.815424Z","title":"EPDT Seminar August 2023,","venue":null,"work_id":"7d571379-0639-48e4-a9fb-b16372afdb79","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.03454","last_updated":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:40:04.671630Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","title":"Simulation-based performance comparison of varied pitch sizes GEM detectors","version":1},"reference_index":23,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.346225Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.03454"},"observation_digest":"sha256:56cd009bdfdf751fe8bb5122ec6a132286842970b305463faec7366b3f7e6509","observation_id":"8af0c5e0-1f01-4d39-9395-d741f104f95e","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.818794Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.349645Z","title":"Bachmann et al","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2002},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.03454","last_updated":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:40:04.671630Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","title":"Simulation-based performance comparison of varied pitch sizes GEM detectors","version":1},"reference_index":24,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.349645Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.03454"},"observation_digest":"sha256:076cb5f9e977812df68fa6acbb9768ce3a315c75acd4b631c0784ddca1a5b819","observation_id":"6ae6e541-57c4-48d1-8368-84f3baa374e7","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.349645Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":"10.22323/1.395.0186","metadata_source":"doi_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.517505Z","title":"Jung et al., PoS ICRC2021 (2021), 186 doi:10.22323/1.395.0186","venue":null,"work_id":"45d9c8ef-68ee-4128-bfc2-e4e555ac3f84","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.03454","last_updated":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:40:04.671630Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","title":"Simulation-based performance comparison of varied pitch sizes GEM detectors","version":1},"reference_index":25,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.352236Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.03454"},"observation_digest":"sha256:323d98ff8cb3c9341ced4b6db7a4f17b0f3ba1d83482776eb7497394e3cee971","observation_id":"22f9aae5-953a-4e46-b546-272d38545b74","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.520368Z","resolver_source":"doi","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:07.180229Z","title":"GEM amplification,","venue":null,"work_id":"1bec87dd-b0ee-405f-a651-27a6ba2eecc7","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.03454","last_updated":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:40:04.671630Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","title":"Simulation-based performance comparison of varied pitch sizes GEM detectors","version":1},"reference_index":26,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.354622Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.03454"},"observation_digest":"sha256:474b2d18116d21763032db31ae79a445f39351f7f43dfd4140b40a39f218e579","observation_id":"f35731e5-a43d-4e6a-801f-7bc24d7124f1","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:07.182648Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":"10.2991/cmes-15.2015.93","metadata_source":"doi_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.510166Z","title":"Wang et al., Comput","venue":null,"work_id":"f67096b0-607b-4e6a-8f1d-118c25e31cd9","year":2015},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.03454","last_updated":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:40:04.671630Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","title":"Simulation-based performance comparison of varied pitch sizes GEM detectors","version":1},"reference_index":27,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.356879Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.03454"},"observation_digest":"sha256:05c2c7e7486d34a85232d96314287dcceccd081e96393262a27e63b7d2b2c28e","observation_id":"7c5037eb-e076-44a4-968c-f1ba2ebf2691","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.512762Z","resolver_source":"doi","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":"10.1016/s0168-9002(02)01472-9","metadata_source":"doi_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.503880Z","title":"Bencivenni et al., Nucl","venue":null,"work_id":"6d03b5b9-c6b2-45f0-b921-6f0b74d17e36","year":2002},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.03454","last_updated":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:40:04.671630Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","title":"Simulation-based performance comparison of varied pitch sizes GEM detectors","version":1},"reference_index":28,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.359410Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.03454"},"observation_digest":"sha256:ff591e01f11d10af6f3f0e0a04b7c344743956bedcd154623624bd196049b526","observation_id":"01237a69-bf4c-4c47-900a-24fe0941d50d","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.506079Z","resolver_source":"doi","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":"10.1007/s41605-022-00361-1","metadata_source":"doi_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.494493Z","title":"Wang et al., Radiat","venue":null,"work_id":"8db715d8-5a19-44ab-af81-3c1314c5498f","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.03454","last_updated":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:40:04.671630Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","title":"Simulation-based performance comparison of varied pitch sizes GEM detectors","version":1},"reference_index":29,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.362100Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.03454"},"observation_digest":"sha256:2b78c4f651d030e79ffc1741c7f6a5dbbe9b10ba83c2d8638d03e9657c9cd0e6","observation_id":"9a1a29b2-c0b7-4ffa-a239-a2219f353f6f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.498133Z","resolver_source":"doi","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:07.173602Z","title":"Simulation study of quadruple-foils GEM detector,","venue":null,"work_id":"f414327a-4034-4d95-bdba-5589a556f904","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.03454","last_updated":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:40:04.671630Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","title":"Simulation-based performance comparison of varied pitch sizes GEM detectors","version":1},"reference_index":30,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.365670Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.03454"},"observation_digest":"sha256:af24b9b672f69110b5b45c07ac4044c31d6fc1864a238acb48c1b78ab7d1be58","observation_id":"4fc408b8-c7e3-4b6a-9172-e1d53fac82aa","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:07.176138Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:07.166994Z","title":"Garfield ++: Simulation of gaseous detectors,","venue":null,"work_id":"dde03561-9abb-4b87-b3e9-2d2018a11dd0","year":2013},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.03454","last_updated":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:40:04.671630Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","title":"Simulation-based performance comparison of varied pitch sizes GEM detectors","version":1},"reference_index":31,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.369152Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.03454"},"observation_digest":"sha256:1bb3ae6f07522b50bd629b53d2abc8ae416b9343fe8acb906a579bbcb108a836","observation_id":"91868d68-0286-4fa9-ae9c-6759ea47fe31","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:07.169338Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:07.159947Z","title":"Brun et al., ”ROOT - A C ++ framework for data analysis and visual- ization,” 2019, https://root.cern.ch/","venue":null,"work_id":"7e9e200f-0be5-429d-8b24-9e1c5376b30b","year":2019},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.03454","last_updated":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:40:04.671630Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","title":"Simulation-based performance comparison of varied pitch sizes GEM detectors","version":1},"reference_index":32,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.371379Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.03454"},"observation_digest":"sha256:8186e19f4c8a361192d0dd42f0530da82bb19c9d1dd45af559fb3e37071aa975","observation_id":"d4fa1a86-0bfc-4277-9736-bf398ebe3ee8","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:07.162483Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:07.152755Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"cf17bc77-49b7-4e33-aa30-cc21f4c3f3f5","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.03454","last_updated":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:40:04.671630Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","title":"Simulation-based performance comparison of varied pitch sizes GEM detectors","version":1},"reference_index":33,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.374669Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.03454"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f9bc5de01c2ea665a3b1535b398e35b85ba96d4f57dfbc5ecbfeeeaa0083abfc","observation_id":"58726554-a196-46e2-8bbe-32860d0a8a93","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:07.156042Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:07.145812Z","title":"COMSOL Multiphysics ® Modeling Soft- ware,","venue":null,"work_id":"dbf78ebc-32bf-4cb3-8ad1-5af2beef37b3","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.03454","last_updated":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:40:04.671630Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","title":"Simulation-based performance comparison of varied pitch sizes GEM detectors","version":1},"reference_index":34,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.377971Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.03454"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f517114c3b0866fa85e2380b68eed6b27889d20f06d84c29b82acd9deb1b35ea","observation_id":"e0c108b2-cd5b-43d9-b164-b15480d37231","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:07.148619Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:07.138890Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"6a6d98e5-cc75-42ef-88a6-50a0bc6b4bf0","year":2000},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.03454","last_updated":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:40:04.671630Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","title":"Simulation-based performance comparison of varied pitch sizes GEM detectors","version":1},"reference_index":35,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.380806Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.03454"},"observation_digest":"sha256:46e5b051ebe044f9604a6dfcc19571bfa6cc6ae56e23388c315ac93dfa131cf4","observation_id":"9472f2ea-aa93-4b75-a412-67bfd2bc22ac","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:07.141547Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:07.131806Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"fcd520d1-7a74-48ed-8d1b-f6a7bd7c6d3b","year":1997},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.03454","last_updated":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:40:04.671630Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","title":"Simulation-based performance comparison of varied pitch sizes GEM detectors","version":1},"reference_index":36,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.383658Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.03454"},"observation_digest":"sha256:9f2d65e9f1069cdae26d8ee56105475dceb492b2cd12b50aac99beb8a2049b85","observation_id":"c0accf17-0b89-4245-b7c3-ed4da75ae976","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:07.134475Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:07.124215Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"736aa5fa-0290-46e0-bbdc-d095b329c7ef","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.03454","last_updated":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:40:04.671630Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","title":"Simulation-based performance comparison of varied pitch sizes GEM detectors","version":1},"reference_index":37,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.387007Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.03454"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e52e5d3fccba623f7e7ebcf5b00b0b105db3701abd69d8d1aa6adc5123266f86","observation_id":"e15939de-471a-48bf-9ed8-6ee41400b164","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:07.127073Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":"10.1016/j.nima.2014.09.061","metadata_source":"doi_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.485449Z","title":"S ¸ahin et al., Nucl","venue":null,"work_id":"ceed3da3-9a52-4cb5-b51c-f627993a5814","year":2014},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.03454","last_updated":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:40:04.671630Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","title":"Simulation-based performance comparison of varied pitch sizes GEM detectors","version":1},"reference_index":38,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.389613Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.03454"},"observation_digest":"sha256:ad6d13a3356072fee75a4401be6996898455a3f47a4a67166e6ef04bfb76e780","observation_id":"647378fe-f0fb-4ddb-84ca-1275b4eecad6","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.488031Z","resolver_source":"doi","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1306.0270","last_updated":"2013-06-03T01:36:00Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T00:15:30.484104Z","submitted_at":"2013-06-03T01:36:00Z","title":"Study of spatial resolution in a single GEM simulated by Monte-Carlo method","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"1306.0270","doi":null,"metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"1306.0270","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.759233Z","title":"Study of spatial resolution in a single GEM simulated by Monte-Carlo method","venue":"physics.ins-det","work_id":"31e90228-4aa1-46e4-9e4f-bcacf47950a1","year":2013},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.03454","last_updated":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:40:04.671630Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","title":"Simulation-based performance comparison of varied pitch sizes GEM detectors","version":1},"reference_index":39,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.392539Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/1306.0270","citing_paper":"/paper/2505.03454"},"observation_digest":"sha256:79770c1e0174b1c49ea0ca2bf59cd9a7cd9e808a945bac55fa737233f5b7deed","observation_id":"e67b2b6d-5e8d-4767-8c75-3720a3c09812","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.762519Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:07.116930Z","title":"Construction and testing of large-area GEM de- tectors for the CMS muon system upgrade,","venue":null,"work_id":"1facd419-7ec7-48e9-915c-4504ed7d12ed","year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.03454","last_updated":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:40:04.671630Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","title":"Simulation-based performance comparison of varied pitch sizes GEM detectors","version":1},"reference_index":40,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.396183Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.03454"},"observation_digest":"sha256:2694c86e8543b863f1993957f9cc9307eed29bc948db0883c9b4a6bcd41145b0","observation_id":"d5b43b53-7b35-4599-afa8-c7a926ab4e00","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:07.119525Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":"10.1016/j.nima.2011.12.059","metadata_source":"doi_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.476237Z","title":"Alfonsi et al., Nucl","venue":null,"work_id":"7fb67d4a-e0e4-4d8d-9abb-24530e2e51ef","year":2012},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.03454","last_updated":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:40:04.671630Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","title":"Simulation-based performance comparison of varied pitch sizes GEM detectors","version":1},"reference_index":41,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.398598Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.03454"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c84f4a979675e46de83c1a96ea1e6bf06cec48ff46815b01afed38b8aebf42f2","observation_id":"71bb04ba-9cbd-41b8-ad3e-3e303b1515ad","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.479641Z","resolver_source":"doi","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1401.4009","last_updated":"2014-01-22T20:43:47Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T23:48:09.443317Z","submitted_at":"2014-01-16T12:44:15Z","title":"A dynamic method for charging-up calculations: the case of GEM","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"1401.4009","doi":null,"metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"1401.4009","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.749096Z","title":"A dynamic method for charging-up calculations: the case of GEM","venue":"physics.ins-det","work_id":"c05d3a63-c4ac-4591-82fa-32d8a7d66003","year":2014},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.03454","last_updated":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:40:04.671630Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","title":"Simulation-based performance comparison of varied pitch sizes GEM detectors","version":1},"reference_index":42,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.401420Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/1401.4009","citing_paper":"/paper/2505.03454"},"observation_digest":"sha256:d9f757fe28849ae0b8d4812713070acaa6c1d836d57f0756a5b6827f17b4f8b0","observation_id":"d020b7b4-0a0f-4c84-b68a-5e9c50b8e059","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.752320Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":"10.1088/1748-0221/11/08/p08018","metadata_source":"doi_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.467080Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"3329dd94-c3a9-47a9-b5ea-89bfb045fe11","year":2016},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.03454","last_updated":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:40:04.671630Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","title":"Simulation-based performance comparison of varied pitch sizes GEM detectors","version":1},"reference_index":43,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.404416Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.03454"},"observation_digest":"sha256:9762eac7815bf6b8a5b48f8a5fb441f8134187a11bd93b4f4e4e38c46a7c9628","observation_id":"43237c5c-0a53-4db7-acd1-5b1428b4db29","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.469595Z","resolver_source":"doi","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2020.16490","doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.736487Z","title":"Hu et al., Nucl","venue":null,"work_id":"a4e67aa5-0157-4d9a-8834-f2fbce22be01","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.03454","last_updated":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:40:04.671630Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","title":"Simulation-based performance comparison of varied pitch sizes GEM detectors","version":1},"reference_index":44,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.407554Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.03454"},"observation_digest":"sha256:99e1bbd82a66e10f1af0873f0180601b4e3c07809669d658549e52f133a7d059","observation_id":"1081f5d7-4af3-4890-8411-b1dce09ee348","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.741252Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"metadata_mismatch"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.410172Z","title":"Tripathy et al., Nucl","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.03454","last_updated":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:40:04.671630Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","title":"Simulation-based performance comparison of varied pitch sizes GEM detectors","version":1},"reference_index":45,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.410172Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.03454"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c5ec8fa6431eb27b85940aa7228b8966d0e554eb70188937f230ce4805e8eea6","observation_id":"f7ff8f89-4feb-4f0a-a671-f0c9a67a6ad8","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.410172Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1708.02118","last_updated":"2017-08-07T13:47:27Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T20:42:48.767712Z","submitted_at":"2017-08-07T13:47:27Z","title":"Preliminary results of Ion Backflow study for a single GEM detector","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"1708.02118","doi":null,"metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"1708.02118","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.624320Z","title":"Preliminary results of Ion Backflow study for a single GEM detector","venue":"physics.ins-det","work_id":"0f591361-ef84-45ff-82fe-29c84ee29d63","year":2017},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.03454","last_updated":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:40:04.671630Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","title":"Simulation-based performance comparison of varied pitch sizes GEM detectors","version":1},"reference_index":46,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.412425Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/1708.02118","citing_paper":"/paper/2505.03454"},"observation_digest":"sha256:52bb0a19352beaa994cb6a06fef1ae8c786e2514dd9ae87b693be7b973fe8aef","observation_id":"f28fc634-16f1-4f63-9f34-73e236fa94ad","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.628209Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"metadata_mismatch"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:07.109635Z","title":"Characterization of GEM detectors using Garfield,","venue":null,"work_id":"a7000d76-51c5-46cd-b2af-d24db3235565","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.03454","last_updated":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:40:04.671630Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","title":"Simulation-based performance comparison of varied pitch sizes GEM detectors","version":1},"reference_index":47,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.415237Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.03454"},"observation_digest":"sha256:eef678b17e6bd5d0c0b46c96ed08e3eec7df1da1befb95747090fa96e5012ec3","observation_id":"aa7b78e2-0d75-430b-9ba0-71a7b8bfec96","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:07.112530Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":"10.1016/s0168-9002(02)01924-1","metadata_source":"doi_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.459194Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"f3e6014b-afed-4d92-a45e-5ad724284ca0","year":2003},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.03454","last_updated":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:40:04.671630Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","title":"Simulation-based performance comparison of varied pitch sizes GEM detectors","version":1},"reference_index":48,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.420338Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.03454"},"observation_digest":"sha256:86ec9955485267c25d15a7503a18e8ccb69654fba1c86720a8be47687a170c2f","observation_id":"9861e616-dc2b-4c8a-bbe6-4e73e6bb8e64","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.462258Z","resolver_source":"doi","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":"10.1088/1742-6596/1498/1/012036","metadata_source":"doi_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.448800Z","title":"Guida et al., J","venue":null,"work_id":"37d8e845-e39c-46dc-b78a-f2dd0e193c38","year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.03454","last_updated":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:40:04.671630Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","title":"Simulation-based performance comparison of varied pitch sizes GEM detectors","version":1},"reference_index":49,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.422605Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.03454"},"observation_digest":"sha256:8fd5df7190587544b615808ee825650c1ab6d9c6d5078f8160aca68f824ba23a","observation_id":"5c805793-a089-4f04-8b15-85b16c53f9a6","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.452986Z","resolver_source":"doi","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:07.092139Z","title":"Seidel, *Microscopic Simulation of GEM Signals*, Bachelor’s thesis, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany, 2018","venue":null,"work_id":"e7585492-3a15-42fe-8fdc-e1316c05d30a","year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.03454","last_updated":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:40:04.671630Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","title":"Simulation-based performance comparison of varied pitch sizes GEM detectors","version":1},"reference_index":50,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.425036Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.03454"},"observation_digest":"sha256:8b68ce4dd516890c4a8a25dbda010edb5510ea8c294444408f87c9bdfec5788f","observation_id":"6ed3a9dc-0338-48c1-9d04-10751e10420b","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:07.095143Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:07.084861Z","title":"Swain et al., Pramana 99 (2025) no.1, 27 doi:10.1007 /s12043-024- 02859-3","venue":null,"work_id":"3bf017d7-5b12-4293-b2c3-3cf028cb6cb6","year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.03454","last_updated":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:40:04.671630Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","title":"Simulation-based performance comparison of varied pitch sizes GEM detectors","version":1},"reference_index":51,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.427711Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.03454"},"observation_digest":"sha256:fd9e9bdcc79bac63cd0c251eb004c6630c0750a846b2b0ddc30e920a544f70de","observation_id":"316d5fe6-50e9-44b9-8c1d-92895bac02a6","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:07.087672Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"malformed_identifier"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:07.100587Z","title":"Available: https://www.scribd.com/document/ 187139051/","venue":null,"work_id":"2b302450-c64d-4dfd-8e66-f9fbd921740f","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.03454","last_updated":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:40:04.671630Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","title":"Simulation-based performance comparison of varied pitch sizes GEM detectors","version":1},"reference_index":2013,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:06.417808Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.03454"},"observation_digest":"sha256:832f8168818c0cf3feaf445efa95accaec48087e9cc0a3f9dbbe257c0bfc33cc","observation_id":"0b05ba78-9848-45c7-b321-4822091a2bd7","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:57:07.102814Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}}],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.03454","last_updated":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","latest_version":1,"primary_category":"hep-ex","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:40:04.671630Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-06T11:51:45Z","title":"Simulation-based performance comparison of varied pitch sizes GEM detectors"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":52,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":6,"metadata_mismatch":2,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":9,"verified_exact":23,"verified_fuzzy":12},"total_outbound_references":52},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 17 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 52 of 52 outbound references and 0 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2505.03454."}