{"as_of":"2026-08-05T17:37:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:e390d3b4144af2a2524313730fa44c9d16349786fb522dba78d1a7a53d2d75fb","coverage":[{"denominator":0,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":3,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":3,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T06:32:48.257954+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":3,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":3,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-04T05:40:55.997266Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"arxiv_reference","source_observed_at":"2026-06-29T15:43:32.568553Z","state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.04441","last_updated":"2025-05-07T14:12:41Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T13:27:15.338046Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-07T14:12:41Z","title":"Towards Effectively Leveraging Execution Traces for Program Repair with Code LLMs","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2505.04441","doi":null,"metadata_source":"arxiv_reference","pith_arxiv_id":"2505.04441","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-29T15:43:32.568553Z","title":"Towards Effectively Leveraging Execution Traces for Program Repair with Code LLMs,","venue":null,"work_id":"7436a6ce-0be7-47bf-ab78-e2a54c985146","year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2512.24635","last_updated":"2026-04-19T09:03:48Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T22:40:27.178487Z","submitted_at":"2025-12-31T05:13:34Z","title":"DynaFix: Iterative Automated Program Repair Driven by Execution-Level Dynamic Information","version":2},"reference_index":14,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-05-16T19:24:24.818989Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2505.04441","citing_paper":"/paper/2512.24635"},"observation_digest":"sha256:fe056aa8b4c23d541080f48d646bae8843ba816a512b79ee48549df158c4306a","observation_id":"3785b358-ab10-4d9b-b748-e1ab6d27359e","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-05-16T19:28:20.743440Z","resolver_source":"arxiv_id","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-05T06:32:48.257954+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T06:32:48.257954+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T06:32:44.755628+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.04441","last_updated":"2025-05-07T14:12:41Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T13:27:15.338046Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-07T14:12:41Z","title":"Towards Effectively Leveraging Execution Traces for Program Repair with Code LLMs","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2505.04441","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-04T05:40:55.997266Z","title":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.04441v1","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2603.29122","last_updated":"2026-08-02T01:31:28Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T17:23:16.062263Z","submitted_at":"2026-03-31T01:18:49Z","title":"ReLog: Execution-Aware Logging with Runtime Feedback for LLM-Oriented Debugging","version":2},"reference_index":2025,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-04T05:40:55.997266Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2505.04441","citing_paper":"/paper/2603.29122"},"observation_digest":"sha256:0dc5a700f1d618b5211d60848ec9baee3aa446c87deb8ec1ecbaeee5e64bae0e","observation_id":"78422cab-af9b-4ef5-9096-2e4f4f136697","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-04T05:40:55.997266Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.04441","last_updated":"2025-05-07T14:12:41Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T13:27:15.338046Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-07T14:12:41Z","title":"Towards Effectively Leveraging Execution Traces for Program Repair with Code LLMs","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2505.04441","doi":null,"metadata_source":"arxiv_reference","pith_arxiv_id":"2505.04441","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-29T15:43:32.568553Z","title":"Towards Effectively Leveraging Execution Traces for Program Repair with Code LLMs,","venue":null,"work_id":"7436a6ce-0be7-47bf-ab78-e2a54c985146","year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2605.27051","last_updated":"2026-05-26T14:04:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T06:38:25.005814Z","submitted_at":"2026-05-26T14:04:40Z","title":"ConVer: Using Contracts and Loop Invariant Synthesis for Scalable Formal Software Verification","version":1},"reference_index":16,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-29T15:40:54.979122Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2505.04441","citing_paper":"/paper/2605.27051"},"observation_digest":"sha256:aad6f43928950071b0d1e61e06a69e39cc725598f60b4c2f9feb47218e550e8d","observation_id":"1c4b2c46-8773-4ccf-ba21-ae2b909e99f9","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-29T15:43:32.570128Z","resolver_source":"arxiv_id","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-05T06:32:48.257954+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T06:32:48.257954+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T06:32:44.755628+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}}],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2505.04441/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2505.04441/integrity","json":"/paper/2505.04441/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2505.04441"},"outbound":[],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.04441","last_updated":"2025-05-07T14:12:41Z","latest_version":1,"primary_category":"cs.LG","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T13:27:15.338046Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-07T14:12:41Z","title":"Towards Effectively Leveraging Execution Traces for Program Repair with Code LLMs"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":0,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":0,"verified_exact":0,"verified_fuzzy":0},"total_outbound_references":0},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T06:32:48.257954+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T06:32:44.755628+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 5 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 3 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2505.04441."}