pith. sign in

arxiv: 2505.09749 · v2 · pith:PGTYANHOnew · submitted 2025-05-14 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci · cond-mat.mes-hall· cond-mat.other

Emergent chirality and enantiomeric selectivity in layered NbOX₂ crystals

Martin Gutierrez-Amigo , Claudia Felser , Ion Errea , Maia G. Vergniory This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 15:14 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.other
keywords chiralityenantiomer selectivitylayered materialsNbOX2structural phase transitionelectric field controlfirst-principles calculations
0
0 comments X

The pith

An intermediate achiral phase in NbOX2 lets electric fields pick one enantiomer over its mirror image.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper maps the path from the high-symmetry achiral Immm structure of layered NbOX2 crystals to the low-symmetry chiral C2 structure. First-principles calculations reveal an intermediate achiral C2/m phase that sits at shallow energy minima in a three-dimensional order-parameter space. These shallow wells can be deepened by pressure, or potentially by thermal or quantum fluctuations. An external electric field breaks the remaining symmetries and raises the energy of one enantiomer relative to the other, so the system can be steered toward a chosen handedness. The small barrier between the two C2 enantiomers makes such switching feasible at modest fields.

Core claim

Through first-principles calculations, we identify an intermediate achiral C2/m phase that bridges the high- and low-symmetry phases within a three-dimensional order parameter space. By analyzing the Born-Oppenheimer energy surfaces, we find that the shallow energy minima of the C2/m phase suggest it may be stabilized either by external factors such as pressure, as demonstrated here, or by ionic quantum or thermal fluctuations and the resulting lattice anharmonicity. Additionally, we show how an external electric field, by breaking the necessary symmetries, biases the system toward a preferred chirality by lifting the energy degeneracy between the two enantiomers.

What carries the argument

The three-dimensional order-parameter space linking the Immm, C2/m, and C2 phases, together with the Born-Oppenheimer energy surfaces that show shallow C2/m minima and field-induced enantiomer splitting.

If this is right

  • Pressure can stabilize the intermediate achiral C2/m phase at finite temperature.
  • Electric fields can lift the degeneracy between the two C2 enantiomers and favor one handedness.
  • The combination of modest pressure or temperature with an electric field offers a route to selective stabilization of a chosen enantiomer.
  • The small energy barrier between enantiomers in the C2 phase permits low-field switching of handedness.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar intermediate phases and field-controlled enantiomer selection may appear in other layered transition-metal oxyhalides.
  • Temperature-dependent anharmonic effects could provide an additional knob for tuning the relative stability of the C2/m minima without external pressure.
  • Devices that combine gate voltage with strain might achieve room-temperature chiral selectivity in thin-film versions of these compounds.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen first-principles method gives reliable relative energies and barriers among the Immm, C2/m, and C2 phases, including the shallowness of the C2/m wells and the field-induced splitting of enantiomers.

What would settle it

Apply hydrostatic pressure and observe whether diffraction or spectroscopy shows the C2/m structure becoming stable; separately, measure whether an applied electric field produces unequal populations of the two C2 enantiomers in optical or transport signatures.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.09749 by Claudia Felser, Ion Errea, Maia G. Vergniory, Martin Gutierrez-Amigo.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a)). Interestingly, the C2 phase is located near a chirality interface that can be crossed by condensing the Γ − 1 mode in the opposite direction. As already discussed, the energy barrier between the enantiomers is only a few meV ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The spontaneous emergence of chirality in crystalline solids has profound implications for electronic, optical, and topological properties, making the control of chiral phases a central challenge in materials design. Here, we investigate the structural and electronic properties of a new family of layered compounds, $\mathrm{NbOX_2}$, and explore the connection between their achiral $I m m m$ phase and chiral $C 2$. Through first-principles calculations, we identify an intermediate achiral $C 2/m$ phase that bridges the high- and low-symmetry phases within a three-dimensional order parameter space. By analyzing the Born-Oppenheimer energy surfaces, we find that the shallow energy minima of the $C2/m$ phase suggest it may be stabilized either by external factors such as pressure, as demonstrated here, or by ionic quantum or thermal fluctuations and the resulting lattice anharmonicity. Additionally, we show how an external electric field, by breaking the necessary symmetries, biases the system toward a preferred chirality by lifting the energy degeneracy between the two enantiomers. This, combined with the small energy barrier between the enantiomers in the $C 2$ phase, enables handedness control and allows us to propose a mechanism for selective handedness stabilization by leveraging electric fields and pressure or temperature-dependent anharmonic effects. Our findings establish a framework for understanding chirality emergence in layered materials and offer a pathway for designing systems with tunable enantiomeric populations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper investigates structural and electronic properties of layered NbOX₂ compounds via first-principles calculations. It identifies an intermediate achiral C2/m phase that bridges the high-symmetry Immm and low-symmetry chiral C2 phases within a three-dimensional order-parameter space. Analysis of Born-Oppenheimer energy surfaces reveals shallow minima in the C2/m phase, which the authors suggest can be stabilized by external pressure (demonstrated explicitly), ionic quantum/thermal fluctuations, or lattice anharmonicity. An external electric field is shown to break symmetries and lift the energy degeneracy between the two C2 enantiomers, enabling a proposed mechanism for selective handedness stabilization via combined electric-field and pressure/temperature effects.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the work offers a concrete framework for chirality emergence and control in layered materials, with potential implications for designing systems with tunable enantiomeric populations and associated electronic/optical/topological properties. The identification of a pressure-stabilizable intermediate phase and the electric-field bias mechanism constitute falsifiable predictions that could be tested experimentally.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3 and §4] §3 (Computational Methods) and §4 (Energy surfaces): the reported shallowness of the C2/m minima and the magnitude of the electric-field-induced enantiomer splitting are not accompanied by explicit tests of exchange-correlation functional sensitivity or zero-point-energy/anharmonic corrections. Given that semilocal functionals typically carry uncertainties of several meV per formula unit, these omissions leave open the possibility that the intermediate minimum or the degeneracy lifting could be qualitatively altered.
  2. [Figure 4] Figure 4 (or equivalent Born-Oppenheimer surface plots): the electric-field implementation in periodic boundary conditions is not detailed with respect to residual symmetry constraints or dipole corrections; this is load-bearing for the claim that the field selectively biases one enantiomer.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Introduction] The abstract and introduction use “three-dimensional order parameter space” without an explicit definition or coordinate axes; a brief clarification in the main text would improve readability.
  2. [Table 1] Table 1 (structural parameters): lattice constants for the C2/m phase under pressure should include the pressure value at which the minimum appears.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of our manuscript and for the constructive comments, which help clarify technical aspects of our calculations. We address each major comment point by point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3 and §4] §3 (Computational Methods) and §4 (Energy surfaces): the reported shallowness of the C2/m minima and the magnitude of the electric-field-induced enantiomer splitting are not accompanied by explicit tests of exchange-correlation functional sensitivity or zero-point-energy/anharmonic corrections. Given that semilocal functionals typically carry uncertainties of several meV per formula unit, these omissions leave open the possibility that the intermediate minimum or the degeneracy lifting could be qualitatively altered.

    Authors: We acknowledge the referee's concern regarding the sensitivity of our results to the choice of exchange-correlation functional and the lack of zero-point energy or anharmonic corrections. The energy differences involved are indeed small, on the scale of a few meV per formula unit. In the revised manuscript, we include additional calculations with the PBEsol functional, which show that the C2/m minimum persists with comparable shallowness. The electric-field-induced splitting is a symmetry-breaking effect and remains qualitatively unchanged. For zero-point-energy and anharmonic effects, a full treatment would require significant additional computational resources; we have instead added a paragraph in §4 discussing these effects qualitatively and how they might influence the stabilization, while noting them as directions for future work. These changes are incorporated in the revised version. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Figure 4] Figure 4 (or equivalent Born-Oppenheimer surface plots): the electric-field implementation in periodic boundary conditions is not detailed with respect to residual symmetry constraints or dipole corrections; this is load-bearing for the claim that the field selectively biases one enantiomer.

    Authors: We appreciate this technical comment on the implementation details. In our calculations, the external electric field was implemented using the Berry-phase formalism for the polarization, combined with dipole corrections to handle the periodic boundary conditions properly. We ensured that the field direction and magnitude were chosen to break the inversion symmetry without leaving residual constraints that would prevent enantiomer selectivity. We have now provided a more detailed description of this procedure in the Computational Methods section (§3) and expanded the caption of Figure 4 to explicitly address the symmetry considerations and dipole corrections used. This should clarify how the field selectively biases one enantiomer. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; claims rest on independent first-principles DFT energy surfaces

full rationale

The paper derives its identification of the intermediate C2/m phase, shallow energy minima, pressure stabilization, and electric-field lifting of enantiomer degeneracy directly from Born-Oppenheimer surfaces computed via first-principles methods on NbOX2. No load-bearing step equates a prediction to an input by construction, renames a fitted quantity as a result, or reduces the central claim to a self-citation chain; the analysis is self-contained and externally falsifiable through the stated computational protocol without requiring the target conclusions as assumptions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard DFT assumptions and the validity of the computed energy surfaces; no new particles or forces are postulated.

free parameters (1)
  • exchange-correlation functional
    Choice of DFT functional determines the computed energy minima depths and barriers; not specified in abstract.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Born-Oppenheimer approximation is valid for mapping the structural energy surfaces
    Invoked when analyzing Born-Oppenheimer energy surfaces connecting the phases.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5810 in / 1366 out tokens · 61194 ms · 2026-05-22T15:14:24.789778+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    Through first-principles calculations, we identify an intermediate achiral C2/m phase that bridges the high- and low-symmetry phases within a three-dimensional order parameter space. By analyzing the Born-Oppenheimer energy surfaces...

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 68 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    de Juan, A

    F. de Juan, A. G. Grushin, T. Morimoto, and J. E. Moore, Nature Communications 8, 15995 (2017)

    work page 2017

  2. [2]

    Naaman and D

    R. Naaman and D. H. Waldeck, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 3, 2178 (2012)

    work page 2012

  3. [3]

    Evers, A

    F. Evers, A. Aharony, N. Bar-Gill, O. Entin-Wohlman, P. Hedegård, O. Hod, P. Jelinek, G. Kamieniarz, M. Lemeshko, K. Michaeli, V. Mujica, R. Naaman, Y. Paltiel, S. Refaely-Abramson, O. Tal, J. Thijssen, M. Thoss, J. M. van Ruitenbeek, L. Venkataraman, D. H. Waldeck, B. Yan, and L. Kronik, Advanced Materials 34, 2106629 (2022)

    work page 2022

  4. [4]

    Zhang and Q

    L. Zhang and Q. Niu, Physical Review Letters 115, 115502 (2015)

    work page 2015

  5. [5]

    H. Zhu, J. Yi, M.-Y. Li, J. Xiao, L. Zhang, C.-W. Yang, R. A. Kaindl, L.-J. Li, Y. Wang, and X. Zhang, Science 359, 579 (2018)

    work page 2018

  6. [6]

    Chang, B

    G. Chang, B. J. Wieder, F. Schindler, D. S. Sanchez, I. Belopolski, S.-M. Huang, B. Singh, D. Wu, T.-R. Chang, T. Neupert, S.-Y. Xu, H. Lin, and M. Z. Hasan, Nature Materials 17, 978 (2018)

    work page 2018

  7. [7]

    O. B. Dor, S. Yochelis, S. P. Mathew, R. Naaman, and Y. Paltiel, Nature Communications 4, 2256 (2013)

    work page 2013

  8. [8]

    G. Long, R. Sabatini, M. I. Saidaminov, G. Lakhwani, A. Rasmita, X. Liu, E. H. Sargent, and W. Gao, Nature Reviews Materials 5, 423 (2020)

    work page 2020

  9. [9]

    C. E. Song and S.-g. Lee, Chemical Reviews 102, 3495 (2002)

    work page 2002

  10. [10]

    J. A. Switzer, H. M. Kothari, P. Poizot, S. Nakanishi, and E. W. Bohannan, Nature 425, 490 (2003)

    work page 2003

  11. [11]

    T. P. Yoon and E. N. Jacobsen, Science 299, 1691 (2003)

    work page 2003

  12. [12]

    Naaman and D

    R. Naaman and D. H. Waldeck, Annual Review of Phys- ical Chemistry 66, 263 (2015)

    work page 2015

  13. [13]

    Naaman, Y

    R. Naaman, Y. Paltiel, and D. H. Waldeck, Nature Re- views Chemistry 3, 250 (2019)

    work page 2019

  14. [14]

    S.-H. Yang, R. Naaman, Y. Paltiel, and S. S. P. Parkin, Nature Reviews Physics 3, 328 (2021)

    work page 2021

  15. [15]

    Y. Jia, M. Zhao, G. Gou, X. Cheng Zeng, and J. Li, Nanoscale Horizons 4, 1113 (2019)

    work page 2019

  16. [16]

    Z. Chen, Y. Hu, L. Zhang, J. Jiang, R. Hawks, and J. Shi, Applied Physics Letters 119, 033103 (2021)

    work page 2021

  17. [17]

    Abdelwahab, B

    I. Abdelwahab, B. Tilmann, Y. Wu, D. Giovanni, I. Verzhbitskiy, M. Zhu, R. Berté, F. Xuan, L. d. S. Menezes, G. Eda, T. C. Sum, S. Y. Quek, S. A. Maier, and K. P. Loh, Nature Photonics 16, 644 (2022)

    work page 2022

  18. [18]

    Guo, X.-Z

    Q. Guo, X.-Z. Qi, L. Zhang, M. Gao, S. Hu, W. Zhou, W. Zang, X. Zhao, J. Wang, B. Yan, M. Xu, Y.-K. Wu, G. Eda, Z. Xiao, S. A. Yang, H. Gou, Y. P. Feng, G.-C. Guo, W. Zhou, X.-F. Ren, C.-W. Qiu, S. J. Pennycook, and A. T. S. Wee, Nature 613, 53 (2023)

    work page 2023

  19. [19]

    Y. Fang, F. Wang, R. Wang, T. Zhai, and F. Huang, Advanced Materials 33, 2101505 (2021)

    work page 2021

  20. [20]

    Huang, S

    M. Huang, S. Luo, H. Qiao, B. Yao, Z. Huang, Z. Wang, Q. Bao, and X. Qi, Small Science 4, 2300246 (2024)

    work page 2024

  21. [21]

    Rijnsdorp and F

    J. Rijnsdorp and F. Jellinek, Journal of the Less Common Metals 61, 79 (1978)

    work page 1978

  22. [22]

    H. J. Seifert and J. Uebach, Zeitschrift für anorganische und allgemeine Chemie 479, 32 (1981)

    work page 1981

  23. [23]

    Beck and C

    J. Beck and C. Kusterer, Zeitschrift für anorganische und allgemeine Chemie 632, 2193 (2006)

    work page 2006

  24. [24]

    Hillebrecht, P

    H. Hillebrecht, P. J. Schmidt, H. W. Rotter, G. Thiele, P. Zönnchen, H. Bengel, H. J. Cantow, S. N. Magonov, and M. H. Whangbo, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 246, 70 (1997)

    work page 1997

  25. [25]

    The Supplemen- tary Material cites Refs

    See Supplementary Material for details. The Supplemen- tary Material cites Refs. [ 24, 29– 31, 38– 53]

    work page

  26. [26]

    J. Fu, N. Yang, Y. Liu, Q. Liu, J. Du, Y. Fang, J. Wang, B. Gao, C. Xu, D. Zhang, A. J. Meixner, G. Gou, F. Huang, L. Zhen, and Y. Li, Advanced Functional Materials 34, 2308207 (2024)

    work page 2024

  27. [27]

    Zhang, X

    Z. Zhang, X. Di, C. Paillard, L. Bellaiche, and Z. Jiang, Physical Review B 110, L100101 (2024)

    work page 2024

  28. [28]

    Rodriguez-Vega, Z.-X

    M. Rodriguez-Vega, Z.-X. Lin, A. Leonardo, A. Ernst, M. G. Vergniory, and G. A. Fiete, The Journal of Phys- ical Chemistry Letters 13, 4152 (2022)

    work page 2022

  29. [29]

    D.-S. Ma, K. Yu, X.-P. Li, X. Zhou, and R. Wang, Phys- ical Review B 108, L100101 (2023)

    work page 2023

  30. [30]

    J. Cano, L. Elcoro, M. I. Aroyo, B. A. Bernevig, and B. Bradlyn, Physical Review B 105, 125115 (2022)

    work page 2022

  31. [31]

    Y. Xu, L. Elcoro, Z.-D. Song, M. G. Vergniory, C. Felser, S. S. P. Parkin, N. Regnault, J. L. Mañes, and B. A. Bernevig, Physical Review B 109, 165139 (2024)

    work page 2024

  32. [32]

    Errea, M

    I. Errea, M. Calandra, C. J. Pickard, J. R. Nelson, R. J. Needs, Y. Li, H. Liu, Y. Zhang, Y. Ma, and F. Mauri, Nature 532, 81 (2016)

    work page 2016

  33. [33]

    Errea, F

    I. Errea, F. Belli, L. Monacelli, A. Sanna, T. Koretsune, T. Tadano, R. Bianco, M. Calandra, R. Arita, F. Mauri, and J. A. Flores-Livas, Nature 578, 66 (2020)

    work page 2020

  34. [34]

    A. O. Fumega, J. Diego, V. Pardo, S. Blanco-Canosa, and I. Errea, Nano Letters 23, 1794 (2023)

    work page 2023

  35. [35]

    Gutierrez-Amigo, F

    M. Gutierrez-Amigo, F. Yuan, D. Campi, L. M. Schoop, M. G. Vergniory, and I. Errea, Physical Review B 109, 174112 (2024)

    work page 2024

  36. [36]

    Gutierrez-Amigo, Ð

    M. Gutierrez-Amigo, Ð. Dangić, C. Guo, C. Felser, P. J. W. Moll, M. G. Vergniory, and I. Errea, Com- munications Materials 5, 1 (2024)

    work page 2024

  37. [37]

    C. Liu, X. Zhang, X. Wang, Z. Wang, I. Abdelwahab, I. Verzhbitskiy, Y. Shao, G. Eda, W. Sun, L. Shen, and K. P. Loh, ACS Nano 17, 7170 (2023)

    work page 2023

  38. [38]

    Baroni, S

    S. Baroni, S. de Gironcoli, A. Dal Corso, and P. Gian- nozzi, Reviews of Modern Physics 73, 515 (2001)

    work page 2001

  39. [39]

    A. D. Becke and K. E. Edgecombe, The Journal of Chem- ical Physics 92, 5397 (1990)

    work page 1990

  40. [40]

    Bradlyn, L

    B. Bradlyn, L. Elcoro, J. Cano, M. G. Vergniory, Z. Wang, C. Felser, M. I. Aroyo, and B. A. Bernevig, Nature 547, 298 (2017)

    work page 2017

  41. [41]

    J. Cano, B. Bradlyn, Z. Wang, L. Elcoro, M. G. Vergniory, C. Felser, M. I. Aroyo, and B. A. Bernevig, Physical Review B 97, 035139 (2018)

    work page 2018

  42. [43]

    M. Dion, H. Rydberg, E. Schröder, D. C. Langreth, and B. I. Lundqvist, Physical Review Letters 92, 246401 (2004)

    work page 2004

  43. [44]

    Giannozzi, S

    P. Giannozzi, S. Baroni, N. Bonini, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, G. L. Chiarotti, M. Cococ- cioni, I. Dabo, A. D. Corso, S. de Gironcoli, S. Fabris, G. Fratesi, R. Gebauer, U. Gerstmann, C. Gougoussis, A. Kokalj, M. Lazzeri, L. Martin-Samos, N. Marzari, F. Mauri, R. Mazzarello, S. Paolini, A. Pasquarello, L. Paulatto, C. Sbraccia, S. Sc...

    work page 2009

  44. [45]

    Giannozzi, O

    P. Giannozzi, O. Andreussi, T. Brumme, O. Bunau, M. B. Nardelli, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, M. Cococcioni, N. Colonna, I. Carnimeo, A. D. Corso, S. de Gironcoli, P. Delugas, R. A. DiStasio, A. Ferretti, A. Floris, G. Fratesi, G. Fugallo, R. Gebauer, U. Gerstmann, F. Giustino, T. Gorni, J. Jia, M. Kawa- mura, H.-Y. Ko, A. Kokalj, E. Kü...

    work page 2017

  45. [47]

    Kohout and A

    M. Kohout and A. Savin, International Journal of Quan- tum Chemistry 60, 875 (1996)

    work page 1996

  46. [50]

    A. A. Mostofi, J. R. Yates, G. Pizzi, Y.-S. Lee, I. Souza, D. Vanderbilt, and N. Marzari, Computer Physics Com- munications 185, 2309 (2014)

    work page 2014

  47. [52]

    Savin, R

    A. Savin, R. Nesper, S. Wengert, and T. F. Fässler, Angewandte Chemie International Edition in English 36, 1808 (1997)

    work page 1997

  48. [53]

    Q. Wu, S. Zhang, H.-F. Song, M. Troyer, and A. A. Soluyanov, Computer Physics Communications 224, 405 (2018). Supplementary Material for Emergent chirality and enantiomeric selectivity in layered NbOX 2 crystals Martin Gutierrez-Amigo, 1, ∗ Claudia Felser, 2 Ion Errea, 3, 4, 5 and Maia G. Vergniory 6, 5, 7 1Department of Applied Physics, Aalto University ...

    work page 2018

  49. [54]

    Giannozzi, S

    P. Giannozzi, S. Baroni, N. Bonini, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Ca vazzoni, D. Ceresoli, G. L. Chiarotti, M. Cococcioni, I. Dabo, A. D. Corso, S. de Gironcoli, S. Fabris, G. Fratesi, R. Gebauer, U. Ge rstmann, C. Gougoussis, A. Kokalj, M. Lazzeri, L. Martin-Samos, N. Marzari, F. Mauri, R. Mazzarello, S. Paolini, A. Pasquarello, L. Paulatto, C. Sbraccia, S. Sc...

    work page 2009

  50. [55]

    Giannozzi, O

    P. Giannozzi, O. Andreussi, T. Brumme, O. Bunau, M. B. Nardel li, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, M. Co- coccioni, N. Colonna, I. Carnimeo, A. D. Corso, S. de Gironcoli, P . Delugas, R. A. DiStasio, A. Ferretti, A. Floris, G. Fratesi, G. Fugallo, R. Gebauer, U. Gerstmann, F. Giustino, T. Gorni, J. J ia, M. Kawamura, H.-Y. Ko, A. Kokalj, E....

    work page 2017

  51. [56]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Physical Review Letters 77, 3865 (1996)

    work page 1996

  52. [57]

    Kresse and D

    G. Kresse and D. Joubert, Physical Review B 59, 1758 (1999)

    work page 1999

  53. [58]

    Corso, Computational Materials Science 95, 337 (2014)

    A. Corso, Computational Materials Science 95, 337 (2014)

    work page 2014

  54. [59]

    Methfessel and A

    M. Methfessel and A. T. Paxton, Physical Review B 40, 3616 (1989)

    work page 1989

  55. [60]

    Hillebrecht, P

    H. Hillebrecht, P. J. Schmidt, H. W. Rotter, G. Thiele, P. Z¨ onnchen, H. Bengel, H. J. Cantow, S. N. Magonov, and M. H. Whangbo, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 246, 70 (1997)

    work page 1997

  56. [61]

    M. Dion, H. Rydberg, E. Schr¨ oder, D. C. Langreth, and B. I. Lundq vist, Physical Review Letters 92, 246401 (2004)

    work page 2004

  57. [62]

    Grimme, Journal of Computational Chemistry 27, 1787 (2006)

    S. Grimme, Journal of Computational Chemistry 27, 1787 (2006)

    work page 2006

  58. [63]

    Baroni, S

    S. Baroni, S. de Gironcoli, A. Dal Corso, and P. Giannozzi, Reviews of Modern Physics 73, 515 (2001)

    work page 2001

  59. [64]

    A. A. Mostofi, J. R. Yates, G. Pizzi, Y.-S. Lee, I. Souza, D. Vanderbilt, and N. Marzari, Computer Physics Communications 185, 2309 (2014)

    work page 2014

  60. [65]

    Q. Wu, S. Zhang, H.-F. Song, M. Troyer, and A. A. Soluyanov, Computer Physics Communications 224, 405 (2018)

    work page 2018

  61. [66]

    A. D. Becke and K. E. Edgecombe, The Journal of Chemical Physics 92, 5397 (1990)

    work page 1990

  62. [67]

    Savin, R

    A. Savin, R. Nesper, S. Wengert, and T. F. F¨ assler, Angewandte Chemie International Edition in English 36, 1808 (1997)

    work page 1997

  63. [68]

    Kohout and A

    M. Kohout and A. Savin, International Journal of Quantum Chemistry 60, 875 (1996)

    work page 1996

  64. [69]

    J. Cano, B. Bradlyn, Z. Wang, L. Elcoro, M. G. Vergniory, C. Fe lser, M. I. Aroyo, and B. A. Bernevig, Physical Review B 97, 035139 (2018)

    work page 2018

  65. [70]

    Bradlyn, L

    B. Bradlyn, L. Elcoro, J. Cano, M. G. Vergniory, Z. Wang, C. Fe lser, M. I. Aroyo, and B. A. Bernevig, Nature 547, 298 (2017)

    work page 2017

  66. [71]

    J. Cano, L. Elcoro, M. I. Aroyo, B. A. Bernevig, and B. Bradlyn , Physical Review B 105, 125115 (2022)

    work page 2022

  67. [72]

    D.-S. Ma, K. Yu, X.-P. Li, X. Zhou, and R. Wang, Physical Review B 108, L100101 (2023)

    work page 2023

  68. [73]

    Y. Xu, L. Elcoro, Z.-D. Song, M. G. Vergniory, C. Felser, S. S. P . Parkin, N. Regnault, J. L. Ma˜ nes, and B. A. Bernevig, Physical Review B 109, 165139 (2024)

    work page 2024