{"as_of":"2026-08-08T20:27:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:257127f4ce69598fced4422b69cb6aaebf344d3c126dd76dea14493826dd68cb","coverage":[{"denominator":22,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":22,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:42:22.583786Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":22,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":22,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":0,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"cited_works","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2505.14104/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2505.14104/integrity","json":"/paper/2505.14104/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2505.14104"},"outbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:42:25.810385Z","title":"may”, “is allowed to","venue":null,"work_id":"20f2cadb-a45d-48cd-83dc-0364c3c1cc0c","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.14104","last_updated":"2025-05-20T09:10:52Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:37:54.437533Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-20T09:10:52Z","title":"Legal Rule Induction: Towards Generalizable Principle Discovery from Analogous Judicial Precedents","version":1},"reference_index":1,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:42:20.514530Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.14104"},"observation_digest":"sha256:16bfaf1f3332898587a67ad21f8b04b94be3b290f0530752b1609869930c01f2","observation_id":"295cb4d7-8e61-40e4-b035-23ff5af39937","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:42:25.866781Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:42:25.395585Z","title":"may,” “is entitled to,","venue":null,"work_id":"3778b084-07da-4b49-bb4a-ddc74d6a1e60","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.14104","last_updated":"2025-05-20T09:10:52Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:37:54.437533Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-20T09:10:52Z","title":"Legal Rule Induction: Towards Generalizable Principle Discovery from Analogous Judicial Precedents","version":1},"reference_index":2,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:42:20.789475Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.14104"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e64adef721d777bc2f4052cbaeb706832b8bf8470091a7a0f0ef789c5bd1a66c","observation_id":"6a76cdb3-0211-4dac-9511-0d216852e130","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:42:25.454278Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:42:25.252795Z","title":"if the driver fails to exercise reasonable care, liability may be increased","venue":null,"work_id":"7c231b56-e352-458d-b1e8-6658f5d47310","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.14104","last_updated":"2025-05-20T09:10:52Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:37:54.437533Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-20T09:10:52Z","title":"Legal Rule Induction: Towards Generalizable Principle Discovery from Analogous Judicial Precedents","version":1},"reference_index":3,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:42:20.895931Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.14104"},"observation_digest":"sha256:8da99cae0efb5d93b078b56cd68225b9ab745d17ccfb3869cdf384adba548daf","observation_id":"b8782e4f-8fd3-4a6d-a096-6b5adbbad59e","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:42:25.319019Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:42:25.651192Z","title":"caused property loss to others","venue":null,"work_id":"a4c5de9f-0bca-42a6-b02b-b3fced4c3898","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.14104","last_updated":"2025-05-20T09:10:52Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:37:54.437533Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-20T09:10:52Z","title":"Legal Rule Induction: Towards Generalizable Principle Discovery from Analogous Judicial Precedents","version":1},"reference_index":6,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:42:20.607077Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.14104"},"observation_digest":"sha256:92e745ad68ec4591dfcb118a326f335b45ceb16e0b064c0a88c1d4fe3caf61cc","observation_id":"01074411-562a-4c26-b1c2-3271cd3648eb","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:42:25.728337Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:42:25.528448Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"8e2266b1-c8bc-4634-aa24-db1f626ebc4c","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.14104","last_updated":"2025-05-20T09:10:52Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:37:54.437533Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-20T09:10:52Z","title":"Legal Rule Induction: Towards Generalizable Principle Discovery from Analogous Judicial Precedents","version":1},"reference_index":7,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:42:20.701638Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.14104"},"observation_digest":"sha256:9fdbec4bed0e526808f6778dc9b02e3cb64e9cca92a037e990f392d858053b8a","observation_id":"c81d388e-f902-43f9-8076-e3af51d10c9d","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:42:25.585073Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:42:25.107107Z","title":"If [Hypothetical condition], then [behavioral pattern], then/otherwise [legal consequence]","venue":null,"work_id":"376f4e0d-97f7-4de6-9de4-a4c8cd156607","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.14104","last_updated":"2025-05-20T09:10:52Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:37:54.437533Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-20T09:10:52Z","title":"Legal Rule Induction: Towards Generalizable Principle Discovery from Analogous Judicial Precedents","version":1},"reference_index":10,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:42:20.985592Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.14104"},"observation_digest":"sha256:3275dc989253fc959d0b8bc9c3eb9df2280b442485445e0b1b0c9da6ea2d156e","observation_id":"42debea9-8ba6-4549-8c5b-6e17d641e040","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:42:25.168198Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:42:24.058711Z","title":"Extracted Rules","venue":null,"work_id":"2a9ed5c5-4590-4d18-9ad2-dbba94c58fdd","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.14104","last_updated":"2025-05-20T09:10:52Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:37:54.437533Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-20T09:10:52Z","title":"Legal Rule Induction: Towards Generalizable Principle Discovery from Analogous Judicial Precedents","version":1},"reference_index":16,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:42:21.630480Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.14104"},"observation_digest":"sha256:6c11c406105976041cbf3e2aba92aa473d64c5950b2eda7d8cc5d51ef44b802d","observation_id":"41d09033-27cc-4bb5-a538-9babbfefee12","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:42:24.153641Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:42:23.888817Z","title":"If [Hypothetical condition], and [behavioral pattern], then/otherwise [legal consequence]","venue":null,"work_id":"7fea0c7a-fbaa-455c-8c4e-27d587988822","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.14104","last_updated":"2025-05-20T09:10:52Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:37:54.437533Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-20T09:10:52Z","title":"Legal Rule Induction: Towards Generalizable Principle Discovery from Analogous Judicial Precedents","version":1},"reference_index":17,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:42:21.747692Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.14104"},"observation_digest":"sha256:2d593b6eacf57e057b1a48a051fa278322bd94668d0e91c32a7375f493f7a77a","observation_id":"589cc2c9-d4aa-4cc3-824d-a28ef2c982d6","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:42:23.976532Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:42:24.980090Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"bb56adf3-a51c-4f59-a99c-99220cae6f05","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.14104","last_updated":"2025-05-20T09:10:52Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:37:54.437533Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-20T09:10:52Z","title":"Legal Rule Induction: Towards Generalizable Principle Discovery from Analogous Judicial Precedents","version":1},"reference_index":18,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:42:21.824609Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.14104"},"observation_digest":"sha256:8858315a862adee93ffd0ccab411f76c2fca4ec9ce8ba28b63d7e2eb98048325","observation_id":"259b236a-4a59-4273-a2c3-dc028eef5ed8","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:42:25.041470Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:42:24.833895Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"139775b4-a09b-4d7b-a30b-53a47998dea8","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.14104","last_updated":"2025-05-20T09:10:52Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:37:54.437533Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-20T09:10:52Z","title":"Legal Rule Induction: Towards Generalizable Principle Discovery from Analogous Judicial Precedents","version":1},"reference_index":19,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:42:21.902958Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.14104"},"observation_digest":"sha256:db063b883b0156920dabfd2a7b5dd065c1388f809328ac299e1073cc556438d0","observation_id":"c3678397-ebc9-40ad-b3d8-4740eb483c11","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:42:24.898236Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:42:24.661576Z","title":"if the driver fails to exercise reasonable care, liability may be increased","venue":null,"work_id":"91d2d964-7017-4a4d-92fd-4b3afea86ae3","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.14104","last_updated":"2025-05-20T09:10:52Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:37:54.437533Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-20T09:10:52Z","title":"Legal Rule Induction: Towards Generalizable Principle Discovery from Analogous Judicial Precedents","version":1},"reference_index":20,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:42:21.963516Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.14104"},"observation_digest":"sha256:09d9b21c185d4bf81953c9ca154b9d8b53b22d957d7e236ed34d1b47ee7b9b1f","observation_id":"c21a1c90-e44c-4773-9755-10bbeafd88cb","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:42:24.751318Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:42:24.472191Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"dba9f8bc-632a-483d-8118-4e7de023afcc","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.14104","last_updated":"2025-05-20T09:10:52Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:37:54.437533Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-20T09:10:52Z","title":"Legal Rule Induction: Towards Generalizable Principle Discovery from Analogous Judicial Precedents","version":1},"reference_index":21,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:42:22.042907Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.14104"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e7ecc4769e80743f910bcda843c63a39606b1f4784f5c536cc87aec77dd0fbca","observation_id":"8abd54d9-6dd2-4987-a6f4-2c65d1fd8da4","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:42:24.548832Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:42:24.240607Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"b3d93e35-2b18-4caf-a40a-73704b33a7c8","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.14104","last_updated":"2025-05-20T09:10:52Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:37:54.437533Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-20T09:10:52Z","title":"Legal Rule Induction: Towards Generalizable Principle Discovery from Analogous Judicial Precedents","version":1},"reference_index":22,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:42:22.163447Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.14104"},"observation_digest":"sha256:ee4fe37744dfc35656c77a16eeded2487b9069a543bb35f617b69a0a3847e835","observation_id":"61c213f4-3fe7-476a-88bd-90c296e8345e","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:42:24.395477Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:42:23.671270Z","title":"Extracted Rules","venue":null,"work_id":"8881e670-a4e1-4251-82f3-2bf31e66bce8","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.14104","last_updated":"2025-05-20T09:10:52Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:37:54.437533Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-20T09:10:52Z","title":"Legal Rule Induction: Towards Generalizable Principle Discovery from Analogous Judicial Precedents","version":1},"reference_index":23,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:42:22.244948Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.14104"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b914baaf122453db44b1d6137d5e1eb338cb9391c09f8d629fedbe0218c5b6ce","observation_id":"f52030a1-414d-478c-bff5-26055e5ddc3e","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:42:23.762813Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:42:23.484615Z","title":"•Behavioral Pattern:Whether the type (may do/should do/must not do) is accurately marked and described","venue":null,"work_id":"90c4afc0-3197-4fa0-b5d2-22a291e7e241","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.14104","last_updated":"2025-05-20T09:10:52Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:37:54.437533Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-20T09:10:52Z","title":"Legal Rule Induction: Towards Generalizable Principle Discovery from Analogous Judicial Precedents","version":1},"reference_index":24,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:42:22.318535Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.14104"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c2109d1b0372c5589755ce7f1a827b4749dda0c1c8a40db078ef616b7e729832","observation_id":"fce8ca51-a8f5-4db1-bb17-1c7efc56dcc9","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:42:23.581591Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:42:23.278534Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"19329c95-fb26-4022-9e35-2f47a6e7aa36","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.14104","last_updated":"2025-05-20T09:10:52Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:37:54.437533Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-20T09:10:52Z","title":"Legal Rule Induction: Towards Generalizable Principle Discovery from Analogous Judicial Precedents","version":1},"reference_index":25,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:42:22.417905Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.14104"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f0d08bcb43fd36e0353c8b5ae8dc8bcc6a817a2e57e6da5e795a2f5e77357e8b","observation_id":"266b07cc-3625-42b9-834d-4a2951f65c45","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:42:23.380348Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:42:23.088580Z","title":"• Whether it is logically equivalent to any rule in the implicit rule set","venue":null,"work_id":"4d1555e6-e4b2-456d-9896-79cb6848d5b2","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.14104","last_updated":"2025-05-20T09:10:52Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:37:54.437533Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-20T09:10:52Z","title":"Legal Rule Induction: Towards Generalizable Principle Discovery from Analogous Judicial Precedents","version":1},"reference_index":26,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:42:22.509225Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.14104"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a79d211b62a71b5da2a27ecfb3a94f65e8e643f4d88d49e82e5d6f6dde417689","observation_id":"88ce9a1e-7416-4736-ae49-3619db02a18f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:42:23.171194Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:42:22.903961Z","title":"Correct\". • In the coverage check,","venue":null,"work_id":"c1bbbb1b-f215-4975-a1c8-4d6a30d1ff91","year":1978},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.14104","last_updated":"2025-05-20T09:10:52Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:37:54.437533Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-20T09:10:52Z","title":"Legal Rule Induction: Towards Generalizable Principle Discovery from Analogous Judicial Precedents","version":1},"reference_index":27,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:42:22.583786Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.14104"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e6e5f48c49693d6c1a5ddb0fa8f2e9b05ee440d73caf899f5dc3dbd062a07157","observation_id":"37e36bbe-9b3c-4c12-914a-8d534d6e675c","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:42:22.978796Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:42:25.936968Z","title":"InPro- ceedings of the 12th International Conference on Arti- ficial Intelligence and Law, ICAIL ’09, page 98–107, New York, NY , USA","venue":null,"work_id":"09b912ff-5a6d-4857-8a9b-c41c934b7d7d","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.14104","last_updated":"2025-05-20T09:10:52Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:37:54.437533Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-20T09:10:52Z","title":"Legal Rule Induction: Towards Generalizable Principle Discovery from Analogous Judicial Precedents","version":1},"reference_index":2009,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:42:19.982755Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.14104"},"observation_digest":"sha256:ce7cc1a9bb247e7dff6c76eec9ee227d0818d5c123bfd3213091aa24dd75cb83","observation_id":"d5ce8f48-58ff-43bb-aceb-41fd704348fc","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:42:26.002714Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2310.08559","last_updated":"2024-05-22T14:35:15Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T15:26:27.022867Z","submitted_at":"2023-10-12T17:51:10Z","title":"Phenomenal Yet Puzzling: Testing Inductive Reasoning Capabilities of Language Models with Hypothesis Refinement","version":4},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2310.08559","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:42:20.214027Z","title":"InProceedings of COLING 2016, the 26th International Conference on Computational Linguistics: System Demonstra- tions, pages 258–262, Osaka, Japan","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2016},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.14104","last_updated":"2025-05-20T09:10:52Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:37:54.437533Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-20T09:10:52Z","title":"Legal Rule Induction: Towards Generalizable Principle Discovery from Analogous Judicial Precedents","version":1},"reference_index":2016,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:42:20.214027Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2310.08559","citing_paper":"/paper/2505.14104"},"observation_digest":"sha256:fdc8341f4aa4b103e63ca318b72257011c25c0cb26d40f277cd64a7c0732a340","observation_id":"4bd7d0be-7af3-4df8-bde8-cbb3b85acdcf","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:42:20.214027Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2008.03519","last_updated":"2020-08-08T13:31:14Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T09:45:35.459864Z","submitted_at":"2020-08-08T13:31:14Z","title":"Learning abstract structure for drawing by efficient motor program induction","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2008.03519","doi":null,"metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"2008.03519","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:42:22.690056Z","title":"Learning abstract structure for drawing by efficient motor program induction","venue":"cs.AI","work_id":"07c5f820-5ec9-425c-8fe8-39e291b6e770","year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.14104","last_updated":"2025-05-20T09:10:52Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:37:54.437533Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-20T09:10:52Z","title":"Legal Rule Induction: Towards Generalizable Principle Discovery from Analogous Judicial Precedents","version":1},"reference_index":2020,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:42:20.306574Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2008.03519","citing_paper":"/paper/2505.14104"},"observation_digest":"sha256:0afb37b37049ec5f048a86104743e83b04a519f6c66f557fdf25a93e00d063d0","observation_id":"384594e6-c564-4a0d-9566-c2a624e12305","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:42:22.775877Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"metadata_mismatch"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2412.16720","last_updated":"2026-04-30T02:46:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T02:11:23.670680Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-21T18:04:31Z","title":"OpenAI o1 System Card","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2412.16720","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:42:19.883910Z","title":"Brenden M Lake, Ruslan Salakhutdinov, and Joshua B Tenenbaum","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2015},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.14104","last_updated":"2025-05-20T09:10:52Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:37:54.437533Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-20T09:10:52Z","title":"Legal Rule Induction: Towards Generalizable Principle Discovery from Analogous Judicial Precedents","version":1},"reference_index":2024,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:42:19.883910Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2412.16720","citing_paper":"/paper/2505.14104"},"observation_digest":"sha256:d8488417eb5676dc76a27aa35619e049b8f0be5c6e27447fd00cc5936335d32b","observation_id":"0f87b2a5-4f7f-4853-a81a-b690d122e9ee","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:42:19.883910Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}}],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.14104","last_updated":"2025-05-20T09:10:52Z","latest_version":1,"primary_category":"cs.CL","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:37:54.437533Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-20T09:10:52Z","title":"Legal Rule Induction: Towards Generalizable Principle Discovery from Analogous Judicial Precedents"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":22,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":1,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":8,"verified_exact":0,"verified_fuzzy":13},"total_outbound_references":22},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 8 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 22 of 22 outbound references and 0 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2505.14104."}