pith. sign in

arxiv: 2505.15566 · v2 · submitted 2025-05-21 · ✦ hep-th · cond-mat.str-el· quant-ph

Hyperscaling of Fidelity and Operator Estimations in the Critical Manifold

Matheus H. Martins Costa , Flavio S. Nogueira , Jeroen van den Brink This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 13:55 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th cond-mat.str-elquant-ph
keywords renormalization groupquantum field theoryground-state fidelityhyperscaling relationscritical manifoldfixed-point approximationslow momentum modes
0
0 comments X

The pith

Ground-state expectation values of slow-momentum observables in a quantum field theory can be approximated by their values at the infrared fixed-point theory to which it flows.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper formulates the renormalization group flow as a quantum channel acting on density matrices of quantum field theories. From this it derives hyperscaling relations for the fidelity between the ground state of a given theory and the ground state of its fixed-point limit. These relations imply that operators supported only on slow momentum modes have expectation values that differ negligibly from the fixed-point averages once criticality is reached. A reader would care because the result supplies a controlled justification for replacing an interacting critical theory by its simpler scale-invariant counterpart in concrete calculations. The approach therefore supplies a practical route to easing the computational cost of simulating critical models.

Core claim

By formulating the renormalization group as a quantum channel acting on density matrices in Quantum Field Theories, we show that ground-state expectation values of observables supported on slow momentum modes can be approximated by their averages on the fixed-point theories to which the QFTs flow. This is done by studying the fidelity between ground states of different QFTs and arriving at certain hyperscaling relations satisfied at criticality.

What carries the argument

The renormalization group viewed as a quantum channel on density matrices, from which hyperscaling relations for ground-state fidelity follow at criticality.

If this is right

  • A QFT can be replaced by its scale-invariant fixed-point theory when computing expectation values of slow-momentum observables at criticality.
  • Numerical and analytical methods for critical models become cheaper by working directly with the simpler fixed-point theory.
  • Cases where the replacement is valid can be identified from the hyperscaling properties of the fidelity.
  • The same channel formulation supplies a systematic way to quantify the error incurred by the approximation.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same fidelity-based argument may extend to lattice regularizations used in condensed-matter simulations of critical points.
  • It suggests a practical test for whether a given numerical ground-state approximation has reached the fixed-point regime.
  • The channel picture could be adapted to study how finite-size effects or relevant perturbations modify the hyperscaling relations.

Load-bearing premise

The renormalization group transformation can be rigorously written as a quantum channel on density matrices and that the resulting fidelity between ground states obeys hyperscaling relations at criticality.

What would settle it

An explicit numerical or analytic computation of the fidelity between the ground state of a concrete QFT (for example the two-dimensional Ising field theory) and the ground state of its fixed-point theory, together with a check that slow-mode operator expectation values converge to the fixed-point values as predicted.

read the original abstract

By formulating the renormalization group as a quantum channel acting on density matrices in Quantum Field Theories (QFTs), we show that ground-state expectation values of observables supported on slow momentum modes can be approximated by their averages on the fixed-point theories to which the QFTs flow. This is done by studying the fidelity between ground states of different QFTs and arriving at certain hyperscaling relations satisfied at criticality. Our results allow for a clear identification of cases in which one can replace a QFT by its scale-invariant limit in the calculation of expectation values, opening the way for a range of applications, including the improvement of numerical and analytical methods used to tackle the costly computer simulation of critical models.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that formulating the renormalization group (RG) as a quantum channel on density matrices in QFTs allows derivation of hyperscaling relations for ground-state fidelity at criticality. These relations justify approximating expectation values of slow-momentum observables in a general QFT by their values in the IR fixed-point theory to which it flows, with applications to numerical simulations of critical models.

Significance. If the central construction holds, the work would provide a quantum-information framework for hyperscaling and operator replacement at criticality, potentially simplifying calculations in CFTs and lattice models by allowing substitution of fixed-point theories for slow modes. It connects fidelity measures to RG flows in a manner that could aid both analytical and computational approaches, though the strength depends on explicit verification of the channel properties.

major comments (2)
  1. [§2] §2: The explicit construction of the RG transformation as a completely positive trace-preserving (CPTP) quantum channel on the ground-state density matrix is not provided in sufficient detail for the continuum QFT setting. Without this, it is unclear whether the map preserves the required properties under coarse-graining of high-momentum modes, which is load-bearing for the fidelity-based hyperscaling argument.
  2. [§4] §4, around the derivation of hyperscaling relations: The relations appear to follow directly from the fixed-point definition rather than being independently derived; this risks making the approximation for expectation values tautological rather than a nontrivial consequence of the fidelity analysis.
minor comments (2)
  1. Notation for the fidelity measure and the slow-momentum support of observables should be defined more explicitly at first use to improve readability for readers outside quantum information.
  2. The abstract mentions applications to computer simulations but the manuscript would benefit from a brief concrete example or reference to a known critical model (e.g., Ising) where the approximation is tested.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address the two major points below and have revised the text to improve clarity and detail where appropriate.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§2] §2: The explicit construction of the RG transformation as a completely positive trace-preserving (CPTP) quantum channel on the ground-state density matrix is not provided in sufficient detail for the continuum QFT setting. Without this, it is unclear whether the map preserves the required properties under coarse-graining of high-momentum modes, which is load-bearing for the fidelity-based hyperscaling argument.

    Authors: We agree that the continuum construction merits more explicit detail. Section 2 defines the RG map via a unitary change to a momentum basis followed by a partial trace over modes with |k| > Λ, which is CPTP by standard properties of partial traces. To address the concern, we have added an expanded paragraph that specifies the UV regularization, shows that the map acts on the ground-state projector while preserving positivity and normalization, and notes that monotonicity of fidelity under this channel follows directly from the CPTP property. This makes the load-bearing step for the hyperscaling argument fully explicit. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4] §4, around the derivation of hyperscaling relations: The relations appear to follow directly from the fixed-point definition rather than being independently derived; this risks making the approximation for expectation values tautological rather than a nontrivial consequence of the fidelity analysis.

    Authors: We disagree that the result is tautological. While scale invariance holds by definition at the fixed point, the hyperscaling relations we derive quantify the approach of the fidelity to unity along the RG flow, using the contractivity of fidelity under the CPTP channel. This supplies a concrete error bound on the difference between expectation values of slow-momentum operators in the original theory and in the IR fixed-point theory. The bound is a direct, nontrivial output of the information-theoretic analysis rather than a restatement of fixed-point properties. We have revised Section 4 to emphasize this error estimate and its origin in the channel monotonicity. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation chain is self-contained

full rationale

The paper formulates the RG transformation as a quantum channel on density matrices, computes fidelity between ground states of QFTs and their IR fixed points, and derives hyperscaling relations for observables supported on slow modes. These relations then justify replacing the QFT by its fixed-point theory for expectation values. No quoted equations or self-citations reduce the central result to a tautological redefinition of inputs, a fitted parameter renamed as prediction, or an ansatz smuggled via prior work by the same authors. The derivation introduces an independent quantum-information perspective on RG flow and fidelity that does not loop back to its own assumptions by construction. The approach remains falsifiable against explicit lattice calculations or other RG schemes outside the present framework.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Review performed on abstract only; full paper not available, so ledger entries are inferred at high level from abstract claims.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Renormalization group can be formulated as a quantum channel acting on density matrices
    Central modeling choice stated in abstract to enable fidelity analysis.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5656 in / 1069 out tokens · 29323 ms · 2026-05-22T13:55:29.165426+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 67 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Hyperscaling of Fidelity and Operator Estimations in the Critical Manifold

    at the RG timet, as well as byµ ϵ, a function ofϵ. We conclude with a discussion of applications of our results, and further directions for this line of work. Our analysis will assume that theories associated with the RG fixed points are Conformal Field Theories (CFTs). Since our focus is on unitary quantum systems, this is a rather weak assumption, see [...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  2. [2]

    Stanley,Introduction to Phase Transitions and Crit- ical Phenomena, International series of monographs on physics (Oxford University Press, 1987)

    H. Stanley,Introduction to Phase Transitions and Crit- ical Phenomena, International series of monographs on physics (Oxford University Press, 1987)

    work page 1987

  3. [3]

    Goldenfeld,Lectures on Phase Transitions and the Renormalization Group(CRC Press, 1992)

    N. Goldenfeld,Lectures on Phase Transitions and the Renormalization Group(CRC Press, 1992)

    work page 1992

  4. [4]

    Cardy,Scaling and Renormalization in Statistical Physics, Cambridge Lecture Notes in Physics (Cam- bridge University Press, 1996)

    J. Cardy,Scaling and Renormalization in Statistical Physics, Cambridge Lecture Notes in Physics (Cam- bridge University Press, 1996)

    work page 1996

  5. [5]

    K. G. Wilson and J. Kogut, The renormalization group and theϵexpansion, Physics Reports12, 75 (1974)

    work page 1974

  6. [6]

    Polchinski, Renormalization and effective lagrangians, Nuclear Physics B231, 269 (1984)

    J. Polchinski, Renormalization and effective lagrangians, Nuclear Physics B231, 269 (1984)

    work page 1984

  7. [7]

    J. I. Cirac, D. Perez-Garcia, N. Schuch, and F. Ver- straete, Matrix product states and projected entangled pair states: Concepts, symmetries, theorems, Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 045003 (2021)

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    Poland, S

    D. Poland, S. Rychkov, and A. Vichi, The Conformal Bootstrap: Theory, Numerical Techniques, and Applica- tions, Rev. Mod. Phys.91, 015002 (2019)

    work page 2019

  9. [9]

    M. H. Martins Costa, J. v. d. Brink, F. S. Nogueira, and G. I. Krein, Wilsonian renormalization as a quantum channel and the separability of fixed points, Phys. Rev. D107, 125014 (2023)

    work page 2023

  10. [10]

    Chapter 9 of the book [37] treats the topic in detail and many of the results described there are used in this work

    work page

  11. [11]

    H.-Q. Zhou, R. Or´ us, and G. Vidal, Ground state fi- delity from tensor network representations, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 080601 (2008)

    work page 2008

  12. [12]

    Gu, Fidelity approach to quantum phase transi- tions, International Journal of Modern Physics B24, 4371 (2010)

    S.-J. Gu, Fidelity approach to quantum phase transi- tions, International Journal of Modern Physics B24, 4371 (2010)

    work page 2010

  13. [13]

    Liu, Q.-Q

    J.-H. Liu, Q.-Q. Shi, H.-L. Wang, J. Links, and H.- Q. Zhou, Universal construction of order parameters for translation-invariant quantum lattice systems with symmetry-breaking order, Phys. Rev. E86, 020102 (2012)

    work page 2012

  14. [14]

    Polchinski, Scale and conformal invariance in quantum field theory, Nuclear Physics B303, 226 (1988)

    J. Polchinski, Scale and conformal invariance in quantum field theory, Nuclear Physics B303, 226 (1988)

    work page 1988

  15. [15]

    Gimenez-Grau, Y

    A. Gimenez-Grau, Y. Nakayama, and S. Rychkov, Scale without conformal invariance in dipolar ferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B110, 024421 (2024)

    work page 2024

  16. [16]

    Di Francesco, P

    P. Di Francesco, P. Mathieu, and D. Senechal,Conformal Field Theory, Graduate Texts in Contemporary Physics (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1997)

    work page 1997

  17. [17]

    Pal, Unitarity and universality in nonrelativistic con- formal field theory, Phys

    S. Pal, Unitarity and universality in nonrelativistic con- formal field theory, Phys. Rev. D97, 105031 (2018)

    work page 2018

  18. [18]

    Pappadopulo, S

    D. Pappadopulo, S. Rychkov, J. Espin, and R. Rattazzi, OPE Convergence in Conformal Field Theory, Phys. Rev. D86, 105043 (2012)

    work page 2012

  19. [19]

    Balasubramanian, M

    V. Balasubramanian, M. B. McDermott, and M. Van Raamsdonk, Momentum-space entangle- ment and renormalization in quantum field theory, Phys. Rev. D86, 045014 (2012)

    work page 2012

  20. [20]

    M. H. Martins Costa, J. van den Brink, F. S. Nogueira, and G. I. Krein, Momentum space entanglement from the wilsonian effective action, Phys. Rev. D106, 065024 (2022)

    work page 2022

  21. [21]

    M. H. Martins Costa, F. S. Nogueira, and J. v. d. Brink, Superselection rules, bosonization duality in 1+1 dimen- sions, and momentum-space entanglement, Phys. Rev. D 110, 105017 (2024)

    work page 2024

  22. [22]

    Weinberg,The Quantum Theory of Fields, Vol

    S. Weinberg,The Quantum Theory of Fields, Vol. 1 (Cambridge University Press, 1995)

    work page 1995

  23. [23]

    Weinberg,The Quantum Theory of Fields, Vol

    S. Weinberg,The Quantum Theory of Fields, Vol. 2 (Cambridge University Press, 1996)

    work page 1996

  24. [24]

    J. C. Collins,Renormalization: An Introduction to Renormalization, the Renormalization Group and the Operator-Product Expansion, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, 1984)

    work page 1984

  25. [25]

    Amoretti and N

    A. Amoretti and N. Magnoli, Conformal perturbation theory, Phys. Rev. D96, 045016 (2017)

    work page 2017

  26. [26]

    R. F. Streater and A. S. Wightman,PCT, Spin and Statistics, and All That(Princeton University Press, 1989)

    work page 1989

  27. [27]

    Haag,Local Quantum Physics: Fields, Particles, Al- gebras(Springer-Verlag, 1996)

    R. Haag,Local Quantum Physics: Fields, Particles, Al- gebras(Springer-Verlag, 1996)

    work page 1996

  28. [28]

    Kravchuk, J

    P. Kravchuk, J. Qiao, and S. Rychkov, Distributions in CFT. Part II. Minkowski space, JHEP08, 094

    work page

  29. [29]

    Jackiw, Schrodinger picture analysis of boson and fermion quantum field theories (1987)

    R. Jackiw, Schrodinger picture analysis of boson and fermion quantum field theories (1987)

    work page 1987

  30. [30]

    Polchinski, Renormalization and Effective La- grangians, Nucl

    J. Polchinski, Renormalization and Effective La- grangians, Nucl. Phys. B231, 269 (1984)

    work page 1984

  31. [31]

    Bagnuls and C

    C. Bagnuls and C. Bervillier, Exact renormalization group equations. An Introductory review, Phys. Rept. 348, 91 (2001)

    work page 2001

  32. [32]

    Goldman, N

    S. Goldman, N. Lashkari, R. G. Leigh, and M. Moosa, Exact renormalization of wave functionals yields contin- uous MERA, Phys. Rev. D108, 085004 (2023)

    work page 2023

  33. [33]

    Goldman, N

    S. Goldman, N. Lashkari, and R. G. Leigh, A lindbla- dian for exact renormalization of density operators in qft (2024), arXiv:2410.16582 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  34. [34]

    Bzowski, P

    A. Bzowski, P. McFadden, and K. Skenderis, Implications of conformal invariance in momentum space, JHEP03, 111

    work page

  35. [35]

    Bzowski, P

    A. Bzowski, P. McFadden, and K. Skenderis, Conformal n-point functions in momentum space, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 131602 (2020)

    work page 2020

  36. [36]

    Nishioka, Entanglement entropy: Holography and renormalization group, Rev

    T. Nishioka, Entanglement entropy: Holography and renormalization group, Rev. Mod. Phys.90, 035007 (2018)

    work page 2018

  37. [37]

    Chapters 6 and 7 of [23] describe this in detail

    work page

  38. [38]

    M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang,Quantum Computa- tion and Quantum Information: 10th Anniversary Edi- tion(Cambridge University Press, 2010)

    work page 2010

  39. [39]

    Bengtsson and K

    I. Bengtsson and K. Zyczkowski,Geometry of Quan- tum States: An Introduction to Quantum Entanglement (Cambridge University Press, 2006)

    work page 2006

  40. [40]

    Takesaki,Theory of Operator Algebras I, Encyclopae- dia of Mathematical Sciences (Springer Berlin Heidel- berg, 2001)

    M. Takesaki,Theory of Operator Algebras I, Encyclopae- dia of Mathematical Sciences (Springer Berlin Heidel- berg, 2001)

    work page 2001

  41. [41]

    Haag, On quantum field theories, Kong

    R. Haag, On quantum field theories, Kong. Dan. Vid. Sel. Mat. Fys. Med.29N12, 1 (1955)

    work page 1955

  42. [42]

    Earman and D

    J. Earman and D. Fraser, Haag’s Theorem and its Im- plications for the Foundations of Quantum Field Theory, Erkenntnis64, 305 (2006)

    work page 2006

  43. [43]

    P. W. Anderson, Infrared catastrophe in fermi gases with 6 local scattering potentials, Phys. Rev. Lett.18, 1049 (1967)

    work page 1967

  44. [44]

    Duncan,The Conceptual Framework of Quantum Field Theory(Oxford University Press, 2012)

    A. Duncan,The Conceptual Framework of Quantum Field Theory(Oxford University Press, 2012)

    work page 2012

  45. [45]

    Zhou and J

    H.-Q. Zhou and J. P. Barjaktareviˇ c, Fidelity and quan- tum phase transitions, Journal of Physics A: Mathemat- ical and Theoretical41, 412001 (2008)

    work page 2008

  46. [46]

    Gu and H.-Q

    S.-J. Gu and H.-Q. Lin, Scaling dimension of fidelity susceptibility in quantum phase transitions, Europhysics Letters87, 10003 (2009)

    work page 2009

  47. [47]

    E. J. K¨ onig, A. Levchenko, and N. Sedlmayr, Universal fidelity near quantum and topological phase transitions in finite one-dimensional systems, Phys. Rev. B93, 235160 (2016)

    work page 2016

  48. [48]

    Nachtergaele and R

    B. Nachtergaele and R. Sims, Lieb-robinson bounds and the exponential clustering theorem, Communications in mathematical physics265, 119 (2006)

    work page 2006

  49. [49]

    M. B. Hastings and T. Koma, Spectral gap and exponen- tial decay of correlations, Commun. Math. Phys.265, 781 (2006)

    work page 2006

  50. [50]

    Ma, The renormalization group and the large n limit, Journal of Mathematical Physics15, 1866 (1974)

    S. Ma, The renormalization group and the large n limit, Journal of Mathematical Physics15, 1866 (1974)

    work page 1974

  51. [51]

    Reehorst, Rigorous bounds on irrelevant operators in the 3d Ising model CFT, JHEP09, 177

    M. Reehorst, Rigorous bounds on irrelevant operators in the 3d Ising model CFT, JHEP09, 177

    work page

  52. [52]

    Furuya, N

    K. Furuya, N. Lashkari, and S. Ouseph, Real-space RG, error correction and Petz map, JHEP01, 170

    work page

  53. [53]

    Furuya, N

    K. Furuya, N. Lashkari, and M. Moosa, Renormalization group and approximate error correction, Phys. Rev. D 106, 105007 (2022)

    work page 2022

  54. [54]

    Senthil, A

    T. Senthil, A. Vishwanath, L. Balents, S. Sachdev, and M. P. A. Fisher, Deconfined quantum critical points, Sci- ence303, 1490–1494 (2004)

    work page 2004

  55. [55]

    C. Wang, A. Nahum, M. A. Metlitski, C. Xu, and T. Senthil, Deconfined quantum critical points: symme- tries and dualities, Phys. Rev. X7, 031051 (2017)

    work page 2017

  56. [56]

    Senthil, (2023), arXiv:2306.12638 [cond-mat.str-el]

    T. Senthil, Deconfined quantum critical points: a review (2023), arXiv:2306.12638 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2023

  57. [57]

    Takahashi, H

    J. Takahashi, H. Shao, B. Zhao, W. Guo, and A. W. Sandvik, So(5) multicriticality in two-dimensional quan- tum magnets (2024), arXiv:2405.06607 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2024

  58. [58]

    De Cesare and S

    F. De Cesare and S. Rychkov, Disturbing News About the d = 2 +ϵExpansion, PTEP2025, 093B02 (2025)

    work page 2025

  59. [59]

    F. D. Cesare and S. Rychkov, Disturbing news about thed= 2 +ϵexpansion ii. assessing the recombination scenario (2026), arXiv:2602.10194 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2026

  60. [60]

    S. M. Chester and N. Su, Bootstrapping Deconfined Quantum Tricriticality, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 111601 (2024)

    work page 2024

  61. [61]

    Birmingham, M

    D. Birmingham, M. Blau, M. Rakowski, and G. Thomp- son, Topological field theory, Physics Reports209, 129 (1991)

    work page 1991

  62. [62]

    Topological Quantum Field Theory, Nonlocal Operators, and Gapped Phases of Gauge Theories

    S. Gukov and A. Kapustin, Topological quantum field theory, nonlocal operators, and gapped phases of gauge theories (2013), arXiv:1307.4793 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  63. [63]

    Vojta, G

    P. Vojta, G. Ortiz, and Z. Nussinov, Topological orders beyond topological quantum field theories, Phys. Rev. B 111, 045142 (2025)

    work page 2025

  64. [64]

    Y. You, J. Bibo, T. L. Hughes, and F. Pollmann, Frac- tonic critical point proximate to a higher-order topo- logical insulator: How does uv blend with ir? (2021), arXiv:2101.01724 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2021

  65. [65]

    Gorantla, H

    P. Gorantla, H. T. Lam, N. Seiberg, and S.-H. Shao, Low- energy limit of some exotic lattice theories and UV/IR mixing, Phys. Rev. B104, 235116 (2021)

    work page 2021

  66. [66]

    Lake, Renormalization group and stability in the ex- citon Bose liquid, Phys

    E. Lake, Renormalization group and stability in the ex- citon Bose liquid, Phys. Rev. B105, 075115 (2022)

    work page 2022

  67. [67]

    local fidelity

    M. R. Gaberdiel, A. Konechny, and C. Schmidt-Colinet, Conformal perturbation theory beyond the leading order, J. Phys. A42, 105402 (2009). End Matter - Calculations of the local fidelity Here we prove some results used in the main text: the exponential decay with the volume of the fidelity between two states of different QFTs and the fact that, for local-...

    work page 2009