{"as_of":"2026-08-18T14:14:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:e5ed668f9d4fdc333dbacc05eadf8ee3aeed12c479a9997aabd4df8a8c2a9a49","coverage":[{"denominator":15,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":15,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:05:22.026358Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":16,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":16,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":1,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-05-13T18:45:23.801303Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"arxiv_reference","source_observed_at":"2026-05-13T18:48:07.919233Z","state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.16339","last_updated":"2025-05-22T07:54:07Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T14:56:56.754339Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-22T07:54:07Z","title":"Rethinking Code Review Workflows with LLM Assistance: An Empirical Study","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2505.16339","doi":null,"metadata_source":"arxiv_reference","pith_arxiv_id":"2505.16339","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-05T21:23:00.469572Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"3cbe2d91-5b88-42d4-ad72-dcce63af0820","year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2604.03196","last_updated":"2026-04-03T17:15:15Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T04:38:17.724504Z","submitted_at":"2026-04-03T17:15:15Z","title":"From Industry Claims to Empirical Reality: An Empirical Study of Code Review Agents in Pull Requests","version":1},"reference_index":3,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-05-13T18:45:23.801303Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2505.16339","citing_paper":"/paper/2604.03196"},"observation_digest":"sha256:84f3e7a31878140bd7c908b59cb1a4fc70306ee64a344ae3ca4319dd1a36d8fa","observation_id":"3e918104-2b09-4054-95b8-3c9d90099e92","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-05-13T18:48:07.921114Z","resolver_source":"arxiv_id","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:34.496301+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}}],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2505.16339/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2505.16339/integrity","json":"/paper/2505.16339/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2505.16339"},"outbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2303.08774","last_updated":"2024-03-04T06:01:33Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T09:58:46.058102Z","submitted_at":"2023-03-15T17:15:04Z","title":"GPT-4 Technical Report","version":6},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2303.08774","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:05:20.814520Z","title":"Gpt-4 technical report,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.16339","last_updated":"2025-05-22T07:54:07Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T14:56:56.754339Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-22T07:54:07Z","title":"Rethinking Code Review Workflows with LLM Assistance: An Empirical Study","version":1},"reference_index":1,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:05:20.814520Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2303.08774","citing_paper":"/paper/2505.16339"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c00a3f18c6bfc5bda6e0a87a06198d8e8598a22889aed79c82ec2226927634e8","observation_id":"ecc9deb1-bed5-4872-85ce-9e3722a16b72","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:05:20.814520Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2412.15115","last_updated":"2025-01-03T02:18:21Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T18:50:07.059564Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-19T17:56:09Z","title":"Qwen2.5 Technical Report","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2412.15115","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:05:20.860546Z","title":"Qwen2.5 technical report,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.16339","last_updated":"2025-05-22T07:54:07Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T14:56:56.754339Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-22T07:54:07Z","title":"Rethinking Code Review Workflows with LLM Assistance: An Empirical Study","version":1},"reference_index":2,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:05:20.860546Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2412.15115","citing_paper":"/paper/2505.16339"},"observation_digest":"sha256:86a0d918a31eaf080c3b01eb617a9339d6a2dd0c643a0530557fb0d17b5a6223","observation_id":"6a7717fa-c7d1-4970-8911-689b5efe7ee7","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:05:20.860546Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2403.08295","last_updated":"2024-04-16T12:52:47Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-03T03:29:01.959523Z","submitted_at":"2024-03-13T06:59:16Z","title":"Gemma: Open Models Based on Gemini Research and Technology","version":4},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2403.08295","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:05:20.916984Z","title":"Gemma: Open models based on gemini research and technology,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.16339","last_updated":"2025-05-22T07:54:07Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T14:56:56.754339Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-22T07:54:07Z","title":"Rethinking Code Review Workflows with LLM Assistance: An Empirical Study","version":1},"reference_index":3,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:05:20.916984Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2403.08295","citing_paper":"/paper/2505.16339"},"observation_digest":"sha256:95bfef22772bbb55440abe66d9257ef812e001203202c6ab7985941b5e36d096","observation_id":"0eaac7b8-0794-4f04-9960-7360d4ae59e9","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:05:20.916984Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:05:20.968525Z","title":"Large language models for software engi- neering: A systematic literature review,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.16339","last_updated":"2025-05-22T07:54:07Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T14:56:56.754339Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-22T07:54:07Z","title":"Rethinking Code Review Workflows with LLM Assistance: An Empirical Study","version":1},"reference_index":4,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:05:20.968525Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.16339"},"observation_digest":"sha256:be6c1b43497eb555a3c9e0f0e255e9de70063aaeb8df952063f8d4b4223bad33","observation_id":"c3e5dfa3-f705-4807-be7b-ad7fd6692382","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:05:20.968525Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2411.11401","last_updated":"2024-11-29T09:48:33Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:43:08.303365Z","submitted_at":"2024-11-18T09:24:01Z","title":"Deep Learning-based Code Reviews: A Paradigm Shift or a Double-Edged Sword?","version":3},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2411.11401","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:05:21.048185Z","title":"Deep learning-based code reviews: A paradigm shift or a double-edged sword?","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.16339","last_updated":"2025-05-22T07:54:07Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T14:56:56.754339Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-22T07:54:07Z","title":"Rethinking Code Review Workflows with LLM Assistance: An Empirical Study","version":1},"reference_index":5,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:05:21.048185Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2411.11401","citing_paper":"/paper/2505.16339"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b59429816271e8ab0ae575f83320e734eccdd5fd1b93b77718d5d943dc04e867","observation_id":"1761baef-4f25-4ef5-9973-190ae31b104c","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:05:21.048185Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:05:22.966263Z","title":"Improving automated code reviews: Learning from experience,","venue":null,"work_id":"bbc9e31b-ef5a-4d9d-b97b-b8941ffbe4b5","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.16339","last_updated":"2025-05-22T07:54:07Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T14:56:56.754339Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-22T07:54:07Z","title":"Rethinking Code Review Workflows with LLM Assistance: An Empirical Study","version":1},"reference_index":6,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:05:21.106965Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.16339"},"observation_digest":"sha256:75df9dc2610deb6d8df787a9a1b7082961d7b84ca08255eb11412d6487cfd634","observation_id":"2d3f0138-deee-4205-bc0a-cea603a30d24","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:05:23.004160Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:34.496301+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:05:22.788640Z","title":"AI-assisted assessment of coding practices in modern code review,","venue":null,"work_id":"acaa8f80-c1c2-412a-8e61-b05c46136e1f","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.16339","last_updated":"2025-05-22T07:54:07Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T14:56:56.754339Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-22T07:54:07Z","title":"Rethinking Code Review Workflows with LLM Assistance: An Empirical Study","version":1},"reference_index":7,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:05:21.175714Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.16339"},"observation_digest":"sha256:497b20cebf27496fdbcab697d2883906cd8149468951c62770cca4aeda52e982","observation_id":"4e0cea4d-f4cd-42e4-8db6-f16585547bbf","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:05:22.882609Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:34.496301+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:05:21.254531Z","title":"AI-powered code review with LLMs: Early results,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.16339","last_updated":"2025-05-22T07:54:07Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T14:56:56.754339Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-22T07:54:07Z","title":"Rethinking Code Review Workflows with LLM Assistance: An Empirical Study","version":1},"reference_index":8,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:05:21.254531Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.16339"},"observation_digest":"sha256:304e4a74981538a765c5a8d0863af3922a910f1d4b63829bc18ebcae3343b81e","observation_id":"12de46da-f97d-4d24-bf22-16f13f3b3d75","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:05:21.254531Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.02092","last_updated":"2025-01-03T20:42:51Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T17:22:27.240962Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-03T20:42:51Z","title":"Human and Machine: How Software Engineers Perceive and Engage with AI-Assisted Code Reviews Compared to Their Peers","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2501.02092","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:05:21.350899Z","title":"Human and machine: How software engineers perceive and engage with AI-assisted code reviews compared to their peers,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.16339","last_updated":"2025-05-22T07:54:07Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T14:56:56.754339Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-22T07:54:07Z","title":"Rethinking Code Review Workflows with LLM Assistance: An Empirical Study","version":1},"reference_index":9,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:05:21.350899Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2501.02092","citing_paper":"/paper/2505.16339"},"observation_digest":"sha256:5b6414608e8adfa9d698bfb9674d1dd3a8a036f7fcf5b38c01bf7aed7bc75f7f","observation_id":"538814b6-4b3a-468b-9116-380fb42d54bc","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:05:21.350899Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:05:22.710081Z","title":"Towards automating code review activities,","venue":null,"work_id":"2ae9da3e-b04e-4274-a6bd-341d74ba6ad6","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.16339","last_updated":"2025-05-22T07:54:07Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T14:56:56.754339Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-22T07:54:07Z","title":"Rethinking Code Review Workflows with LLM Assistance: An Empirical Study","version":1},"reference_index":10,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:05:21.465498Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.16339"},"observation_digest":"sha256:d3d0a6d9e84144b1094cbeb86610055a05eabec55187e6fa5117ed922e3e4e19","observation_id":"1c193770-92df-4517-b198-3dd99575be0f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:05:22.742001Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:34.496301+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:05:21.584736Z","title":"A survey on hallucination in large language models: Principles, taxonomy, challenges, and open questions,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.16339","last_updated":"2025-05-22T07:54:07Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T14:56:56.754339Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-22T07:54:07Z","title":"Rethinking Code Review Workflows with LLM Assistance: An Empirical Study","version":1},"reference_index":11,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:05:21.584736Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.16339"},"observation_digest":"sha256:cdf963e517019149790f1594c6c1b99b08b2df429475695eccbd27f8c2c854aa","observation_id":"3af95178-0475-4471-b484-b63c6b775297","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:05:21.584736Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:05:22.623789Z","title":"Using thematic analysis in psychology,","venue":null,"work_id":"5c8af0b9-2de1-481c-8cc6-c17f068181d3","year":2006},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.16339","last_updated":"2025-05-22T07:54:07Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T14:56:56.754339Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-22T07:54:07Z","title":"Rethinking Code Review Workflows with LLM Assistance: An Empirical Study","version":1},"reference_index":12,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:05:21.674934Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.16339"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f0f39cd2293b070f3834252005a53139a1406d7245ddd2cd35030d897af364e8","observation_id":"8b87a2ba-6222-4870-8910-67aaa4e3d14e","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:05:22.656603Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:34.496301+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:05:22.475160Z","title":"Research and scholarly methods: Semi-structured interviews,","venue":null,"work_id":"167082c9-08ff-4e32-8f95-23301f28fa89","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.16339","last_updated":"2025-05-22T07:54:07Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T14:56:56.754339Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-22T07:54:07Z","title":"Rethinking Code Review Workflows with LLM Assistance: An Empirical Study","version":1},"reference_index":13,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:05:21.790131Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.16339"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f8b18de12646cb3aecb53d02b635e321347a0f0aadfd048d582e2a877e40974d","observation_id":"051484dd-6437-4be5-800b-9c9d93c507e5","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:05:22.576323Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:34.496301+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:05:22.346971Z","title":"Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling,","venue":null,"work_id":"5e2eb658-f4c6-4ea0-8acf-a612aa25ec42","year":2016},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.16339","last_updated":"2025-05-22T07:54:07Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T14:56:56.754339Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-22T07:54:07Z","title":"Rethinking Code Review Workflows with LLM Assistance: An Empirical Study","version":1},"reference_index":14,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:05:21.936711Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.16339"},"observation_digest":"sha256:6c6b8c6420b966ffd5cee326b9d045444159dff325ca8606b4f822e258e2c12d","observation_id":"0147f581-69c8-49ff-b83f-5c459db70e7d","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:05:22.419131Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:34.496301+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:05:22.257666Z","title":"How many interviews are enough?: An experiment with data saturation and variability,","venue":null,"work_id":"d5cdf053-63f9-4870-af4d-02d216c0eabb","year":2006},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.16339","last_updated":"2025-05-22T07:54:07Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T14:56:56.754339Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-22T07:54:07Z","title":"Rethinking Code Review Workflows with LLM Assistance: An Empirical Study","version":1},"reference_index":15,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:05:22.026358Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.16339"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e8f2b15ccf47e2b4ab52b1f6da484b3d11c713ef896d8e1f782fa3ead30c70f0","observation_id":"9ef9d6c8-e057-4e2f-a4e0-b7ffaaad5d27","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:05:22.299977Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:34.496301+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}}],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.16339","last_updated":"2025-05-22T07:54:07Z","latest_version":1,"primary_category":"cs.SE","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T14:56:56.754339Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-22T07:54:07Z","title":"Rethinking Code Review Workflows with LLM Assistance: An Empirical Study"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":15,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":8,"verified_exact":0,"verified_fuzzy":7},"total_outbound_references":15},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:34.496301+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 18 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 15 of 15 outbound references and 1 inbound Pith citation observation for arXiv:2505.16339."}