{"as_of":"2026-08-08T14:39:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:18d60d81412748306e38046ff92b70e13a6d7f3d27b68554a0469b83d462984d","coverage":[{"denominator":33,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":33,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:21.032843Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":34,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":34,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":1,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-03T11:55:53.395391Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"cited_works","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.21407","last_updated":"2025-08-27T15:09:47Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:26:15.828608Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-27T16:31:41Z","title":"Breaking coexistence: Zealotry vs. nonlinear social impact","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2505.21407","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-03T11:55:53.395391Z","title":"Llabrés, M","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2601.05169","last_updated":"2026-06-23T07:58:32Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T07:00:45.047016Z","submitted_at":"2026-01-08T17:57:53Z","title":"Reducibility of higher-order to pairwise interactions: Social impact models on hypergraphs","version":2},"reference_index":34,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-03T11:55:53.395391Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2505.21407","citing_paper":"/paper/2601.05169"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f90d7dc88f0e362ad7dd06741dad9a5feb410b738341d21e3c95a0f0786e6e0e","observation_id":"f0ee5455-bcf5-472a-9ac9-75b7289d64ab","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-03T11:55:53.395391Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}}],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2505.21407/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2505.21407/integrity","json":"/paper/2505.21407/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2505.21407"},"outbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:28.177240Z","title":"(6)] with one-sided zealots as follows, dx dt = (1 − x − z) f (x + z) − x f(1 − x − z), (29) where f (x) is the social impact function","venue":null,"work_id":"e4f0f76e-7268-482d-a878-e4609c5ca203","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.21407","last_updated":"2025-08-27T15:09:47Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:26:15.828608Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-27T16:31:41Z","title":"Breaking coexistence: Zealotry vs. nonlinear social impact","version":2},"reference_index":1,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:17.166626Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.21407"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b4ee8bc689f42ab3650d774df06243b950bddff6e86fec44800d9600f506156b","observation_id":"c022b1d6-c528-4683-8081-e6b96d80bf1d","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:28.296458Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:27.997666Z","title":"Thus, for any q < 1 we find f ′(x) → +∞ for x ↓ 0","venue":null,"work_id":"e4590053-8d7a-4105-b81a-814369e6cbbd","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.21407","last_updated":"2025-08-27T15:09:47Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:26:15.828608Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-27T16:31:41Z","title":"Breaking coexistence: Zealotry vs. nonlinear social impact","version":2},"reference_index":2,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:17.266242Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.21407"},"observation_digest":"sha256:3885aecb371d017f31498beaa14fd4aa3e0bfa9a8e184aa845b68b21913efdd1","observation_id":"ceb3b21e-6bc2-4ef3-bd73-c2fee13f132a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:28.090086Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:27.804490Z","title":"(13)] can be generalised as follows, to account for a social impact function f , dx dt = (1 − x − z) f (x + z)π+(x, z) −x f(1 − x − z)π−(x, z)","venue":null,"work_id":"12f2cf9a-dace-40e4-876c-badc9058cf83","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.21407","last_updated":"2025-08-27T15:09:47Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:26:15.828608Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-27T16:31:41Z","title":"Breaking coexistence: Zealotry vs. nonlinear social impact","version":2},"reference_index":3,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:17.389823Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.21407"},"observation_digest":"sha256:7a60f3fe2d75ae92fe260ada598cf9d2f06bdb9421a81e9aa0b247174fe77527","observation_id":"24744c71-613f-4df2-a461-acc0910d9b16","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:27.922273Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:27.496312Z","title":"(33) For α > 1/2 this condition is always fulfilled (for all z) as (1 − α)/α is then smaller than one","venue":null,"work_id":"1815ba6f-100d-446a-8b8a-68c85079494e","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.21407","last_updated":"2025-08-27T15:09:47Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:26:15.828608Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-27T16:31:41Z","title":"Breaking coexistence: Zealotry vs. nonlinear social impact","version":2},"reference_index":4,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:17.511427Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.21407"},"observation_digest":"sha256:76b1d236e7210f0aae02c6232b1f521f371aaf004ecfb8abd628707b56b5ad98","observation_id":"fe19a8f0-92c4-44eb-88a7-3f50e4b78268","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:27.630897Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:27.279078Z","title":"We focus again on f (x) =xq, noting that q-deformed evolutionary dynamics without zealots were pre- viously studied in Ref","venue":null,"work_id":"55ee7955-112f-45ed-9502-b1d0028c8989","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.21407","last_updated":"2025-08-27T15:09:47Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:26:15.828608Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-27T16:31:41Z","title":"Breaking coexistence: Zealotry vs. nonlinear social impact","version":2},"reference_index":5,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:17.628258Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.21407"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f4c2823b32d7e1d731ca15ab333f1b32f5b12af1d4ea2823500fd9dbb8e01ba8","observation_id":"24758465-ebe2-4aff-9342-4da67b5b23da","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:27.377606Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:27.052492Z","title":"Allowing for a general social impact 11 function, Eqs","venue":null,"work_id":"1fee41aa-4c4c-4e9d-a701-f9dfd745cf7b","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.21407","last_updated":"2025-08-27T15:09:47Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:26:15.828608Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-27T16:31:41Z","title":"Breaking coexistence: Zealotry vs. nonlinear social impact","version":2},"reference_index":6,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:17.742773Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.21407"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e86ef1a35a457b0d49cf26767893456e1c80e020839efcec76ff23068e71e1a5","observation_id":"09dd3852-372b-43b8-b9d4-59c116a4a510","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:27.165156Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:26.756195Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"fed801ad-d77e-4545-9e55-f30de8dc5202","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.21407","last_updated":"2025-08-27T15:09:47Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:26:15.828608Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-27T16:31:41Z","title":"Breaking coexistence: Zealotry vs. nonlinear social impact","version":2},"reference_index":7,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:17.831666Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.21407"},"observation_digest":"sha256:8dec616238389a73920e4471b04143cc8f6d8351d91712f841061b9b6147d634","observation_id":"10cda3b9-2c84-4527-8eee-3be3b667c807","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:26.883598Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:26.518511Z","title":"This is restricted to the nonlinear voter model and evolu- tionary games","venue":null,"work_id":"38541280-9848-4c07-a758-0af26b177b56","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.21407","last_updated":"2025-08-27T15:09:47Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:26:15.828608Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-27T16:31:41Z","title":"Breaking coexistence: Zealotry vs. nonlinear social impact","version":2},"reference_index":8,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:18.020932Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.21407"},"observation_digest":"sha256:26e0a9964035eed1341e5e6870c715bea43971e5aba220d726ea6730b2f86169","observation_id":"2cf7f996-8f50-4f16-bfb5-950d9d7b35bb","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:26.621748Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:26.219792Z","title":"(5) T + n = N S − n N n + Z N − 1 q , T − n = N n N N − Z − n N − 1 q","venue":null,"work_id":"a25d9946-499f-4e43-badc-84723086dee7","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.21407","last_updated":"2025-08-27T15:09:47Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:26:15.828608Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-27T16:31:41Z","title":"Breaking coexistence: Zealotry vs. nonlinear social impact","version":2},"reference_index":9,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:18.167887Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.21407"},"observation_digest":"sha256:065436762cf8a94b6ef9b07abb421414d2b7ac3e493fad6056a33bfdcd63e1cc","observation_id":"a58e500e-4b67-428a-b9da-56ea53bf11cf","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:26.306527Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:26.004441Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"7aadd2df-489e-4335-8c0a-d1a45307d2b2","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.21407","last_updated":"2025-08-27T15:09:47Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:26:15.828608Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-27T16:31:41Z","title":"Breaking coexistence: Zealotry vs. nonlinear social impact","version":2},"reference_index":10,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:18.293357Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.21407"},"observation_digest":"sha256:7049777fdfa2adc9d7f212ca176248922d7416858bfaa5b0cbc1b39bb8909098","observation_id":"3b1f3161-514a-4036-9753-85f619f2a854","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:26.093941Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:25.741902Z","title":"We report simulation results in Fig","venue":null,"work_id":"09c78d5d-c837-4327-b302-e0e69264ffed","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.21407","last_updated":"2025-08-27T15:09:47Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:26:15.828608Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-27T16:31:41Z","title":"Breaking coexistence: Zealotry vs. nonlinear social impact","version":2},"reference_index":11,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:18.467485Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.21407"},"observation_digest":"sha256:15af2138678ed26e61bd74ed7f5e4b4bf8e6084e0408951d2635b9a9ca9461bf","observation_id":"e552aba9-086c-4e0b-98d3-a5381d324c41","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:25.858109Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:25.502286Z","title":"For example in Fig","venue":null,"work_id":"f909b63b-b209-4118-ba1b-e96a0769564d","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.21407","last_updated":"2025-08-27T15:09:47Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:26:15.828608Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-27T16:31:41Z","title":"Breaking coexistence: Zealotry vs. nonlinear social impact","version":2},"reference_index":12,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:18.600165Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.21407"},"observation_digest":"sha256:81909cb522ea1f22bcefdb4ff43a32e45234657e682cfd73d225799c71cb70f3","observation_id":"b610c149-d2f2-42d4-be12-63f9cfb4fb6e","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:25.634101Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:25.270989Z","title":"6 we plot the quasi-stationary distribution for the nonlinear voter model with varying numbers of zealots","venue":null,"work_id":"06bea04f-7fee-4275-95c4-ab34be5b8bfd","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.21407","last_updated":"2025-08-27T15:09:47Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:26:15.828608Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-27T16:31:41Z","title":"Breaking coexistence: Zealotry vs. nonlinear social impact","version":2},"reference_index":13,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:18.808718Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.21407"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e22722e5c5a1d833bb278d4569ee52aa646573ac92d831c7622d25de41516ecb","observation_id":"24c422e6-318b-4d68-8083-347516aa80e5","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:25.355381Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:18.995108Z","title":"For fixed model parameters (e.g","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.21407","last_updated":"2025-08-27T15:09:47Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:26:15.828608Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-27T16:31:41Z","title":"Breaking coexistence: Zealotry vs. nonlinear social impact","version":2},"reference_index":14,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:18.995108Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.21407"},"observation_digest":"sha256:21ded332f75aa428329536af72ee89472b27cceb2577cb5afb7f0a709b012009","observation_id":"e8a79048-2b11-46cd-ac36-0ff610f24d1e","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:18.995108Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:25.135115Z","title":"(6) becomes dx dt = (1 − x − z) x + z 2 q − x 1 − x − z 2 q","venue":null,"work_id":"7f4ee769-4113-4f48-bc24-400b4a73683e","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.21407","last_updated":"2025-08-27T15:09:47Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:26:15.828608Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-27T16:31:41Z","title":"Breaking coexistence: Zealotry vs. nonlinear social impact","version":2},"reference_index":15,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:19.119219Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.21407"},"observation_digest":"sha256:60f31a40febf913d291f9effe111d66259be05650b9c09f9657c5a477ee29473","observation_id":"f33dbe8e-60af-499e-b3b6-b480ead72679","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:25.226258Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:24.971889Z","title":"(6) becomes dx dt = (1 − x − z)(x + z)q − x(1 − x − z)q","venue":null,"work_id":"dac8237e-32fb-4c93-a933-9e2c2d898e39","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.21407","last_updated":"2025-08-27T15:09:47Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:26:15.828608Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-27T16:31:41Z","title":"Breaking coexistence: Zealotry vs. nonlinear social impact","version":2},"reference_index":16,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:19.234464Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.21407"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e6c9fc9d8974b3d812b1f720380c5bb28152575b3cd6387547d8661e0afca17b","observation_id":"1a3db1ee-e78d-4eb2-b1f1-a11b87f0c9d3","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:25.063021Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:24.746757Z","title":"(A6) has two additional fixed points x∗ a and x∗ b where x∗ a < x∗ b < x∗ c","venue":null,"work_id":"2db02e52-8058-4e49-84b0-b09d03b01c0a","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.21407","last_updated":"2025-08-27T15:09:47Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:26:15.828608Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-27T16:31:41Z","title":"Breaking coexistence: Zealotry vs. nonlinear social impact","version":2},"reference_index":17,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:19.380160Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.21407"},"observation_digest":"sha256:ba4c5170142b453c5d7a7ca8c8bf99cfb9ea9b81b7452f9d9ba5c53e998d6540","observation_id":"4699fdd5-6087-43de-8763-e36a8d47d9fa","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:24.824791Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:24.575772Z","title":"(A6) has one additional fixed point x∗ a < x∗ c that is stable from the left and unstable from the right","venue":null,"work_id":"26499019-b0a0-491d-8124-95316d11b708","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.21407","last_updated":"2025-08-27T15:09:47Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:26:15.828608Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-27T16:31:41Z","title":"Breaking coexistence: Zealotry vs. nonlinear social impact","version":2},"reference_index":18,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:19.512604Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.21407"},"observation_digest":"sha256:5f248a3d567fe1c3f63e935bf71c4eaae6d88fcdeec656268a4cd3874c9be95b","observation_id":"7b5ad04f-84a2-441f-85d6-ad47519c4239","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:24.648866Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:24.399388Z","title":"(A6) has no additional fixed points","venue":null,"work_id":"e0820758-2838-455f-91b4-4b3c0a7638f5","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.21407","last_updated":"2025-08-27T15:09:47Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:26:15.828608Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-27T16:31:41Z","title":"Breaking coexistence: Zealotry vs. nonlinear social impact","version":2},"reference_index":19,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:19.653147Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.21407"},"observation_digest":"sha256:3fe428ce172649ab96e77d75a2925a17999d298a262fbf7887f61896583d82f2","observation_id":"e95cf359-c29c-4bbc-896a-48ed3765f9c4","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:24.465258Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:24.235239Z","title":"(6)] becomes ˙x = (1 − x − z) x + 1 2 (1 + δ )z q − x 1 − x − 1 2 (1 + δ )z q","venue":null,"work_id":"35d6081d-5d6b-4785-b523-de36eaf901d2","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.21407","last_updated":"2025-08-27T15:09:47Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:26:15.828608Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-27T16:31:41Z","title":"Breaking coexistence: Zealotry vs. nonlinear social impact","version":2},"reference_index":20,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:19.769222Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.21407"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b374f32ff4703eec72b14a96abe0eb6a5fc37cd8d0ff6a792d94cf1134584c24","observation_id":"358f4570-ef17-4880-ab40-a18baf7837d1","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:24.296020Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:24.068314Z","title":"(A13) Here we derive a closed form approximation to Eq","venue":null,"work_id":"a3751440-7c8f-40a5-9518-55f0a9dbc890","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.21407","last_updated":"2025-08-27T15:09:47Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:26:15.828608Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-27T16:31:41Z","title":"Breaking coexistence: Zealotry vs. nonlinear social impact","version":2},"reference_index":21,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:19.957625Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.21407"},"observation_digest":"sha256:dafb8717dd200b3db6f511e1954cd6a923dcaff2e4834476ec252252beb4ec43","observation_id":"e4f1263a-47d0-4a87-95e3-96a468c7a5c6","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:24.160180Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:23.747414Z","title":"α x + z 2 + (1 − α) 1 − x − z 2 # − x 1 − x − z 2 ×","venue":null,"work_id":"1d16c19d-51de-4fbc-9d19-6dbb05bd805c","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.21407","last_updated":"2025-08-27T15:09:47Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:26:15.828608Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-27T16:31:41Z","title":"Breaking coexistence: Zealotry vs. nonlinear social impact","version":2},"reference_index":22,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:20.115470Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.21407"},"observation_digest":"sha256:90c6d5acc72284c0f0a697129a15b9c2b6abccd66206ab80a48370d85c71956f","observation_id":"60cd5867-b427-40dc-8f91-d9807b5f0877","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:23.893660Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:23.375263Z","title":"(B3) The stabilities of the various fixed points can be deduced by looking an interactive plot of Eq","venue":null,"work_id":"a65cf89c-0504-4ffa-a4c0-5237a281acfe","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.21407","last_updated":"2025-08-27T15:09:47Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:26:15.828608Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-27T16:31:41Z","title":"Breaking coexistence: Zealotry vs. nonlinear social impact","version":2},"reference_index":23,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:20.212524Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.21407"},"observation_digest":"sha256:4ef385ca565144c1bea1b27167ef7574d210bda121772cae4528274514a3771e","observation_id":"1e29e15e-a7ef-4c88-b7b9-af70bb04e56c","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:23.530935Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:23.160775Z","title":"(13) becomes dx dt = (1 − x − z)(x + z) × α(x + z) + (1 − α)(1 − x − z) − x(1 − x − z) × (1 − α)(x + z) +α(1 − x − z)","venue":null,"work_id":"6f8392ef-0515-4210-a152-27fec33dc525","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.21407","last_updated":"2025-08-27T15:09:47Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:26:15.828608Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-27T16:31:41Z","title":"Breaking coexistence: Zealotry vs. nonlinear social impact","version":2},"reference_index":24,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:20.320705Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.21407"},"observation_digest":"sha256:d4fc9a3adbd5ae1de7ac9b93c023eb45db371e7cfb1aeb248cdff9a0d01cbff4","observation_id":"17680ffd-1d76-442c-8cbe-66424e3ba3b5","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:23.259462Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:22.864405Z","title":"α x + 1 + δ 2 z + (1 − α) 1 − x − 1 + δ 2 z # − x 1 − x − 1 + δ 2 z ×","venue":null,"work_id":"97311fa6-752d-41b1-810e-a8f13babb42a","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.21407","last_updated":"2025-08-27T15:09:47Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:26:15.828608Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-27T16:31:41Z","title":"Breaking coexistence: Zealotry vs. nonlinear social impact","version":2},"reference_index":25,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:20.392524Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.21407"},"observation_digest":"sha256:908c1d007a385bbdf661cc4113c1cc6c2cb851b9c90b795ca9bc755f3d5c0e1b","observation_id":"477f380d-d8f9-4bec-8097-8dfc4b03581b","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:23.045880Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:22.634740Z","title":"(B4) except with a nonlinear social impact function xq, dx dt = (1 − x − z)(x + z)q × α(x + z) + (1 − α)(1 − x − z) − x(1 − x − z)q × (1 − α)(x + z) +α(1 − x − z)","venue":null,"work_id":"8639ce13-dfd0-447c-bb94-e378f6d2622e","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.21407","last_updated":"2025-08-27T15:09:47Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:26:15.828608Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-27T16:31:41Z","title":"Breaking coexistence: Zealotry vs. nonlinear social impact","version":2},"reference_index":26,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:20.453255Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.21407"},"observation_digest":"sha256:4ee98bfb71586d4f64bcd96146a171a28b39951531133323af6995d2018b960f","observation_id":"ead4ce14-b268-4070-a525-d043eceae7b8","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:22.734190Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:22.412218Z","title":"(21) become Σ − (1 − z) ≤∆ ≤ −Σ + (1 − z), −Σ ≤∆ ≤ Σ","venue":null,"work_id":"2deadb81-b3a2-41f2-acc9-8a821a96818d","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.21407","last_updated":"2025-08-27T15:09:47Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:26:15.828608Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-27T16:31:41Z","title":"Breaking coexistence: Zealotry vs. nonlinear social impact","version":2},"reference_index":27,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:20.509836Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.21407"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f8ae276f3101dd6096faba61682b8525271f6931d9e087efd3db310921f36b0b","observation_id":"23cccefc-7d3f-4e8e-8334-f381090e6ab5","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:22.523154Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:22.259620Z","title":"(21)] are identical to the conditions for balanced zealots [Eqs","venue":null,"work_id":"44acd061-a7f2-49fc-996d-6edfddd95f4b","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.21407","last_updated":"2025-08-27T15:09:47Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:26:15.828608Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-27T16:31:41Z","title":"Breaking coexistence: Zealotry vs. nonlinear social impact","version":2},"reference_index":28,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:20.585045Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.21407"},"observation_digest":"sha256:40377c6856bc947362ebe60360b392e102135d7f7dafc38d9d37842af7bd054f","observation_id":"c7da69ae-3d34-42bd-b3eb-b33ac6ecaba7","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:22.328078Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:22.048141Z","title":"(21) are again the same as in the balanced and one-sided zealots cases, i.e","venue":null,"work_id":"0e7544e6-5bcf-40f5-b18d-e1d819b1c61b","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.21407","last_updated":"2025-08-27T15:09:47Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:26:15.828608Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-27T16:31:41Z","title":"Breaking coexistence: Zealotry vs. nonlinear social impact","version":2},"reference_index":29,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:20.658815Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.21407"},"observation_digest":"sha256:1129b57d79b388a1e601b61108dbe63da7bd3c73ce8c3748a9bf6e9c57949f66","observation_id":"0a65ddd8-13dd-4933-ae0f-c6cb9c294e9d","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:22.150013Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:21.838605Z","title":"(35) we form the Jacobian matrix evaluated at C+ [Eq","venue":null,"work_id":"c573b696-c240-4045-b2c3-e3a0968c6104","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.21407","last_updated":"2025-08-27T15:09:47Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:26:15.828608Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-27T16:31:41Z","title":"Breaking coexistence: Zealotry vs. nonlinear social impact","version":2},"reference_index":30,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:20.737669Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.21407"},"observation_digest":"sha256:aba2aae42aeed359f92172431e4efd307e7a2331746b636928eaa1abcd258729","observation_id":"0dbe97c3-a512-4eda-9dec-73541b19617f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:21.927095Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:21.614271Z","title":"(37) that the consensus fixed point C+ is stable when q < 1 and unstable when q > 1","venue":null,"work_id":"7ce6e07e-985a-4830-9662-510eb67aa409","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.21407","last_updated":"2025-08-27T15:09:47Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:26:15.828608Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-27T16:31:41Z","title":"Breaking coexistence: Zealotry vs. nonlinear social impact","version":2},"reference_index":31,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:20.806234Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.21407"},"observation_digest":"sha256:2588d1dd24368530181f683913cd3323165fde23871474df0c5c94fb85527cf2","observation_id":"82bc1cd9-279c-4dbb-9d63-e535fbd3d894","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:21.723445Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:21.459909Z","title":"(39) We broadly follow the steps in Ref","venue":null,"work_id":"31724112-84e6-4f8c-9038-b285da7c4663","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.21407","last_updated":"2025-08-27T15:09:47Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:26:15.828608Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-27T16:31:41Z","title":"Breaking coexistence: Zealotry vs. nonlinear social impact","version":2},"reference_index":32,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:20.892306Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.21407"},"observation_digest":"sha256:50437fa080ff02b538f0239300d7ab284ca4b24dbfd4c16280a558a3252a3224","observation_id":"7dcea340-2bb5-4553-93f3-b04ea17808c4","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:21.530190Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2505.11358","doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:21.303992Z","title":"Stochastic evolutionary game dynamics,","venue":null,"work_id":"9f7e13ae-9110-48be-af3b-55819627a777","year":1972},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.21407","last_updated":"2025-08-27T15:09:47Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:26:15.828608Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-27T16:31:41Z","title":"Breaking coexistence: Zealotry vs. nonlinear social impact","version":2},"reference_index":33,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:21.032843Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.21407"},"observation_digest":"sha256:d27bda0ac799a991d4462ba96dc4b7742c7b77650d4e51a792f70be1d3697511","observation_id":"e6fb6500-25ea-475d-bde3-dbeff26aa3e0","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:44:21.356777Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}}],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.21407","last_updated":"2025-08-27T15:09:47Z","latest_version":2,"primary_category":"physics.soc-ph","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:26:15.828608Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-27T16:31:41Z","title":"Breaking coexistence: Zealotry vs. nonlinear social impact"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":33,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":3,"verified_exact":1,"verified_fuzzy":29},"total_outbound_references":33},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 8 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 33 of 33 outbound references and 1 inbound Pith citation observation for arXiv:2505.21407."}