{"as_of":"2026-08-16T09:33:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:8163a14d7ffc84aa94a79f52d40927d4ccd5893c96d13e15ac1e5599204f4768","coverage":[{"denominator":58,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":58,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:56.226957Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":58,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":58,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":0,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"cited_works","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2505.23820/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2505.23820/integrity","json":"/paper/2505.23820/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2505.23820"},"outbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:24:05.490686Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"6327f62e-ac81-4907-9f8c-9b519ff6f4ae","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.23820","last_updated":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T10:08:31.202217Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","title":"Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks","version":1},"reference_index":1,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:52.198871Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.23820"},"observation_digest":"sha256:859e250a95a36e5594d8ce92b6897092d7f09f1fb8f7ac5b44780b5c58245a20","observation_id":"e49bc5aa-211c-4f7f-b441-31228fdc7075","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:24:05.540791Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:51.247273Z","title":"arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.13341","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.23820","last_updated":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T10:08:31.202217Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","title":"Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks","version":1},"reference_index":2,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:51.247273Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.23820"},"observation_digest":"sha256:d1d6b68bf6d9d481253a52c473ca8a3e9c976d2019e40633fb4d2a5ef004c252","observation_id":"3f77f499-1fbb-4bd2-9442-efb880faa316","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:51.247273Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2412.09569","last_updated":"2025-06-10T17:54:35Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T05:44:23.549539Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-12T18:51:13Z","title":"JuStRank: Benchmarking LLM Judges for System Ranking","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2412.09569","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:51.306832Z","title":"Computational Linguistics, pages 1–79","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.23820","last_updated":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T10:08:31.202217Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","title":"Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks","version":1},"reference_index":3,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:51.306832Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2412.09569","citing_paper":"/paper/2505.23820"},"observation_digest":"sha256:6612dbd353000eb1fe40ab1b917aaf860d5c87c3b5a3669b5206eefff1f03f8b","observation_id":"f2b73356-9bf0-4845-bf90-087e6e8af349","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:51.306832Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:24:01.442759Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"28600ea5-93fa-4964-b94e-d186075ace22","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.23820","last_updated":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T10:08:31.202217Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","title":"Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks","version":1},"reference_index":4,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:54.253934Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.23820"},"observation_digest":"sha256:5407730b6799c494b0643cb36bdcf756b96cc3ede9766ffed77a904de9493a11","observation_id":"fc38fd31-2c52-43f1-8486-9e496d0c59b7","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:24:01.517640Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2406.06369","last_updated":"2024-10-07T17:13:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T02:32:36.382160Z","submitted_at":"2024-06-10T15:30:13Z","title":"Annotation alignment: Comparing LLM and human annotations of conversational safety","version":4},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2406.06369","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:51.453586Z","title":"PloS one, 19(8):e0307741","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.23820","last_updated":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T10:08:31.202217Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","title":"Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks","version":1},"reference_index":5,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:51.453586Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2406.06369","citing_paper":"/paper/2505.23820"},"observation_digest":"sha256:2db258dcbe01363a974d27ab57b2a0e95331179be862fbeb4535a566b1ca2419","observation_id":"21675b91-42b0-4346-8d5c-3efa541a0428","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:51.453586Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2010.03532","last_updated":"2020-10-08T19:32:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:00:56.784761Z","submitted_at":"2020-10-07T17:26:06Z","title":"What Can We Learn from Collective Human Opinions on Natural Language Inference Data?","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2010.03532","doi":null,"metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"2010.03532","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:56.571654Z","title":"What Can We Learn from Collective Human Opinions on Natural Language Inference Data?","venue":"cs.CL","work_id":"d38f9456-20f4-4583-9a39-435b44b0e2a8","year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.23820","last_updated":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T10:08:31.202217Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","title":"Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks","version":1},"reference_index":6,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:51.516077Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2010.03532","citing_paper":"/paper/2505.23820"},"observation_digest":"sha256:5fbfc1a4c236e4176714a19554f0dcb4f296b3a0f9863dc9c1978fd44c912946","observation_id":"2cffc3f0-5379-4b31-9312-d2577b244163","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:56.621840Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"metadata_mismatch"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:24:05.637706Z","title":"In The Thirty-eighth Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems","venue":null,"work_id":"0a6281db-2109-457c-95dd-02274bcaf5ca","year":2002},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.23820","last_updated":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T10:08:31.202217Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","title":"Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks","version":1},"reference_index":8,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:51.658237Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.23820"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a9406bc8436258fac8ba0fcb7ccf89a3b474a3a15def58d14fb31c406719f26f","observation_id":"7d507328-e78d-4e2e-a586-1182f6b83ec3","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:24:05.737127Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2411.10109","last_updated":"2026-06-28T22:37:51Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T12:33:17.230204Z","submitted_at":"2024-11-15T11:14:34Z","title":"LLM Agents Grounded in Self-Reports Enable General-Purpose Simulation of Individuals","version":3},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2411.10109","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:51.716422Z","title":"arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.10109","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.23820","last_updated":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T10:08:31.202217Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","title":"Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks","version":1},"reference_index":9,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:51.716422Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2411.10109","citing_paper":"/paper/2505.23820"},"observation_digest":"sha256:8cadfbe22acb37f6ef12ec8ea370b182386a24d0358387fc163fe9d9d8d8b0a8","observation_id":"cf414de8-f5cb-4774-a741-0368a7daa066","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:51.716422Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2402.01908","last_updated":"2025-02-03T16:28:59Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T02:32:37.288726Z","submitted_at":"2024-02-02T21:21:06Z","title":"Large language models that replace human participants can harmfully misportray and flatten identity groups","version":3},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2402.01908","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:51.785827Z","title":"Angelina Wang, Jamie Morgenstern, and John P Dick- erson","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.23820","last_updated":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T10:08:31.202217Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","title":"Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks","version":1},"reference_index":11,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:51.785827Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2402.01908","citing_paper":"/paper/2505.23820"},"observation_digest":"sha256:75a2764b8609a2aff35462044aecc822ea91a43eefd2ed72015ebde1e55517d8","observation_id":"4c27bcdb-3240-4fa8-9836-28e435a06b05","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:51.785827Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2404.12452","last_updated":"2024-10-06T05:55:28Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T08:41:08.786099Z","submitted_at":"2024-04-18T18:26:43Z","title":"Characterizing LLM Abstention Behavior in Science QA with Context Perturbations","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2404.12452","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:51.792519Z","title":"Sheng-Lun Wei, Cheng-Kuang Wu, Hen-Hsen Huang, and Hsin-Hsi Chen","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.23820","last_updated":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T10:08:31.202217Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","title":"Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks","version":1},"reference_index":12,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:51.792519Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2404.12452","citing_paper":"/paper/2505.23820"},"observation_digest":"sha256:8c72f799f61e703127b062acaf8bdc4764fad561302f2703dcda85b2d2da74bd","observation_id":"63d4d49b-d07f-41a1-9d27-ce35964f4831","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:51.792519Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2410.02736","last_updated":"2024-10-04T03:57:47Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-01T08:21:19.528254Z","submitted_at":"2024-10-03T17:53:30Z","title":"Justice or Prejudice? Quantifying Biases in LLM-as-a-Judge","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2410.02736","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:51.933537Z","title":"In Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 4331–4344, Bangkok, Thailand","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.23820","last_updated":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T10:08:31.202217Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","title":"Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks","version":1},"reference_index":14,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:51.933537Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2410.02736","citing_paper":"/paper/2505.23820"},"observation_digest":"sha256:53ef8604cd15babf392d54a1420e8c3a0d872a22cf76e8562bf76eee4599c672","observation_id":"6e402fa4-2599-4dcc-aea5-eeadf9694d1a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:51.933537Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2310.17631","last_updated":"2025-03-01T17:06:43Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T19:00:00.338243Z","submitted_at":"2023-10-26T17:48:58Z","title":"JudgeLM: Fine-tuned Large Language Models are Scalable Judges","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2310.17631","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:52.045926Z","title":"both\" or","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.23820","last_updated":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T10:08:31.202217Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","title":"Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks","version":1},"reference_index":15,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:52.045926Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2310.17631","citing_paper":"/paper/2505.23820"},"observation_digest":"sha256:2b8d922916387f2d74d0f586016c315fbd8b3888f0d659708ae6206ec0fa8012","observation_id":"02c8fd81-3950-4342-8506-651c0e1ea80d","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:52.045926Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"malformed_identifier"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:24:05.313559Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"7bfcb70e-5a72-4b13-86b3-b96932a55081","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.23820","last_updated":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T10:08:31.202217Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","title":"Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks","version":1},"reference_index":17,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:52.335115Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.23820"},"observation_digest":"sha256:17a2e7575adad921e4accaceab65ee885c3ec412a76242facb6ad3f29b3452e7","observation_id":"87fc5299-aab7-4786-aa38-016554b34663","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:24:05.391789Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:24:05.085964Z","title":"My final verdict is tie : [[ A = B ]]","venue":null,"work_id":"ae0d3f04-e991-49cc-901c-bc43f8bf694b","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.23820","last_updated":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T10:08:31.202217Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","title":"Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks","version":1},"reference_index":18,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:52.473228Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.23820"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a3212e91085d5e6f0e1886c73a55ef7401ff1362dc1507dc0ca623bbad5ceb6c","observation_id":"edc56f97-4417-4bf0-a00b-c96599f4eb04","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:24:05.196566Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:24:04.920661Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"a9a47764-b95f-4044-82fc-f4caebac9c6b","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.23820","last_updated":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T10:08:31.202217Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","title":"Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks","version":1},"reference_index":19,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:52.558078Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.23820"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a9314948686dc0cd12fa1c8730767a0b018e578906f67bb2eee04e5c4f32bb96","observation_id":"4a06cd92-38dd-4fac-a41d-7386c45e40b7","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:24:04.995415Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:24:04.728709Z","title":"’ s e c o n d _ r o u n d _ t h i n k i n g : ’1","venue":null,"work_id":"43ce5d79-c4be-404b-91b3-96bdd675f074","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.23820","last_updated":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T10:08:31.202217Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","title":"Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks","version":1},"reference_index":20,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:52.646210Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.23820"},"observation_digest":"sha256:4bebb64f7498b6433d3dc79a9bb7906aeb6deb687c247eef226c8aed989ce023","observation_id":"1305ecb8-7554-400d-b560-1547823314d2","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:24:04.806792Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:24:04.512324Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"af55598d-8a3b-448e-9597-e0418f251dc7","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.23820","last_updated":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T10:08:31.202217Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","title":"Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks","version":1},"reference_index":21,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:52.788332Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.23820"},"observation_digest":"sha256:2d1d7909964f00864a912c42ba6ec1e2987dff2c2c6e48361ea9044c59dc104b","observation_id":"a0b37465-7286-4734-afb6-f3681da22be2","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:24:04.621820Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:24:03.995319Z","title":"’ n th _ r ou n d _t h i nk i n g : ’1","venue":null,"work_id":"d6bbcb81-e9a4-4e9c-8ec3-33984ce24f51","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.23820","last_updated":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T10:08:31.202217Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","title":"Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks","version":1},"reference_index":22,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:52.901625Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.23820"},"observation_digest":"sha256:4fc82c83dbaf50fba3aeb0cd9664e8095844b2f62bfae9dfb3fd70b9e4c9d172","observation_id":"9ca24958-c0ad-457e-aa0a-f350c2706708","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:24:04.183640Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:24:03.879331Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"69657a29-ba38-4c41-b012-ad9fb7e28a2e","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.23820","last_updated":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T10:08:31.202217Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","title":"Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks","version":1},"reference_index":23,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:52.991743Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.23820"},"observation_digest":"sha256:551c6d64beb410d32966f8047f86c0b87412dca6a1888542632b1b7fc005487c","observation_id":"42e71d4d-b094-44eb-a439-1a437add77f7","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:24:03.920368Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:24:03.740062Z","title":"< QUESTION >","venue":null,"work_id":"4d15d1a3-829b-4af2-9a9f-43dba08ec88a","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.23820","last_updated":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T10:08:31.202217Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","title":"Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks","version":1},"reference_index":24,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:53.107554Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.23820"},"observation_digest":"sha256:8652dfebdcdd3d1be84fa21a63438be36488e08f1bdaf23149d90a34fc413019","observation_id":"e566b718-2988-49ad-b480-50cd2fee701c","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:24:03.792658Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:24:03.561574Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"9b668782-3b5a-4297-8708-01ae5f9d4a68","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.23820","last_updated":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T10:08:31.202217Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","title":"Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks","version":1},"reference_index":25,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:53.213588Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.23820"},"observation_digest":"sha256:fdf929585ef8a0a172a88e2c22b0c0167c0f56363523a17530a21bffd555a5a6","observation_id":"ccec10ec-ea24-471c-bca3-4bdcc3982f97","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:24:03.652403Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:24:03.335258Z","title":"Answer : <A | B | Tie >","venue":null,"work_id":"c9afc0e7-3e4a-473a-b7f1-c3f68e3ec76f","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.23820","last_updated":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T10:08:31.202217Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","title":"Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks","version":1},"reference_index":26,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:53.294864Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.23820"},"observation_digest":"sha256:775ecb27dac6ff20a3f5132e16c309f55198fd69b124a51c43e9193a244fed39","observation_id":"a842de72-971a-4ad0-8b95-fa6880ff80a0","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:24:03.433289Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:24:03.137539Z","title":"A well - balanced vegetarian diet can provide all necessary nutrients while reducing the intake of saturated fats and cholesterol commonly found in meat","venue":null,"work_id":"9d18209a-626b-4e08-9f1d-5ae74c3126ab","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.23820","last_updated":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T10:08:31.202217Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","title":"Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks","version":1},"reference_index":27,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:53.378683Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.23820"},"observation_digest":"sha256:384f85102f46a1e44cdd508292fb7f1cee181aacf690c299f0d82608d7df3d5a","observation_id":"39271214-bae8-4c91-a5eb-9498da4544c3","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:24:03.192908Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:24:02.939900Z","title":"Reducing meat consumption can help mitigate climate change and promote environmental sustainability","venue":null,"work_id":"c39a7950-b149-49f5-a006-2122d46a3607","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.23820","last_updated":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T10:08:31.202217Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","title":"Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks","version":1},"reference_index":28,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:53.455120Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.23820"},"observation_digest":"sha256:799790409f6a218de01c6c72b6b5e3d02d314664e0b3f235a765a1b2accbf788","observation_id":"8399c1de-1721-4402-8606-293148468377","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:24:03.002015Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:24:02.731447Z","title":"** Arguments against becoming vegetarian :**","venue":null,"work_id":"10d28ab7-28bd-4f42-9689-24a73c1c30e3","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.23820","last_updated":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T10:08:31.202217Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","title":"Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks","version":1},"reference_index":29,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:53.547909Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.23820"},"observation_digest":"sha256:93b7d3e90302c30a5f470b61ee8773ea5352de0a8335e4deb4258109cc103495","observation_id":"2c489002-c111-475a-8c67-01f63069d7b1","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:24:02.816187Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:24:02.559460Z","title":"Some people may find it challenging to meet their nutritional needs without animal products","venue":null,"work_id":"c308d2b9-2687-4bb6-a467-0e8c660fb40d","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.23820","last_updated":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T10:08:31.202217Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","title":"Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks","version":1},"reference_index":30,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:53.655416Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.23820"},"observation_digest":"sha256:1ebd8d02195e1b264d7425758087b5f1340d40656e4ca6fd897e8e405b0d694c","observation_id":"44fac053-eb38-498a-83f5-6b7f75137682","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:24:02.614414Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:24:02.390913Z","title":"For many , meat consumption is an integral part of their culinary heritage and lifestyle , making the transition to vegetarianism difficult","venue":null,"work_id":"fbbf6f08-af9a-4a5a-b056-9898a9fee582","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.23820","last_updated":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T10:08:31.202217Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","title":"Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks","version":1},"reference_index":31,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:53.745399Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.23820"},"observation_digest":"sha256:d5353d650cb45c8da0d3de02f42aeccafc26ceca7bbc4cd92e4f60197903cc09","observation_id":"36550dcc-5644-45ba-bb60-eb9f6695c8d0","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:24:02.455890Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:24:02.194954Z","title":"vegetarian diets are healthful, nutritionally adequate, and may provide health benefits in the prevention and treatment of certain diseases","venue":null,"work_id":"f1f4d94f-b00f-40b1-b931-02d002eb9373","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.23820","last_updated":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T10:08:31.202217Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","title":"Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks","version":1},"reference_index":32,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:53.838113Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.23820"},"observation_digest":"sha256:0cde4641187fabc0b4b8fe48ea2c7194605db4c360e3065566d5b9b2c1362137","observation_id":"3536b335-f87a-4f5e-b46b-ee1e6a1b475b","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:24:02.300526Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:24:01.996084Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"f4d4d968-29fb-4d68-872c-2480b2c1ed9d","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.23820","last_updated":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T10:08:31.202217Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","title":"Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks","version":1},"reference_index":33,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:53.958113Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.23820"},"observation_digest":"sha256:ec35466360d8972bbb2d69a32ad16f817ff4333ff4d30915bfc6fb8e7bed7d06","observation_id":"b11f410c-843e-4368-87ea-a4682e031cf7","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:24:02.105834Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:24:01.777982Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"92975e60-0ba7-4445-95ec-b094696a6551","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.23820","last_updated":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T10:08:31.202217Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","title":"Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks","version":1},"reference_index":34,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:54.041642Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.23820"},"observation_digest":"sha256:4fbb74fe6e1e0d3026cd2229bd07481bf2421508256ec8e23a0aa6fe837c3859","observation_id":"7dd14c1b-ade5-4cc1-bdf3-2d9674ee9179","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:24:01.897132Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:24:01.608265Z","title":"Each point is supported with specific data or statements from authoritative sources","venue":null,"work_id":"98199c66-708e-45e5-a8f1-c45455258607","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.23820","last_updated":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T10:08:31.202217Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","title":"Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks","version":1},"reference_index":35,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:54.169863Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.23820"},"observation_digest":"sha256:59b14384c43f14d7c90f44cd42809205a5cbf87a2b1163cafd1817e13b010777","observation_id":"8bb22c86-493f-4b6e-adb5-8cf49842c860","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:24:01.673493Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:24:01.275064Z","title":"Sustainable","venue":null,"work_id":"a5b2151e-9021-457f-be20-d4ed994aea4b","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.23820","last_updated":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T10:08:31.202217Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","title":"Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks","version":1},"reference_index":37,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:54.292221Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.23820"},"observation_digest":"sha256:4c46e9845c85d44e60fee89ca2ce65bdb996501029f6de9e3aceba36537e7244","observation_id":"48d6d194-dfa2-4ced-83de-382302f83637","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:24:01.371413Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:24:01.026141Z","title":"- Provides specific health benefits ( lower risks of heart disease , diabetes , and certain cancers ) and environmental impacts (14.5% of human - induced emissions from livestock )","venue":null,"work_id":"b27c73c6-6013-415b-b97d-000011edd74e","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.23820","last_updated":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T10:08:31.202217Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","title":"Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks","version":1},"reference_index":38,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:54.361994Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.23820"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a5c5e9459f7be73d45ee6e9a53a056788119475ddcc7e36eb52a4f8039392676","observation_id":"9dfead65-7162-449a-ab20-cb0fcb312a9c","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:24:01.136436Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:24:00.842276Z","title":"- Points out the cultural and traditional significance of meat , which is a valid consideration in dietary choices","venue":null,"work_id":"5808bdfa-65e0-4df2-b588-9dc7e8f823a5","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.23820","last_updated":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T10:08:31.202217Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","title":"Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks","version":1},"reference_index":39,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:54.451361Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.23820"},"observation_digest":"sha256:9b9922bf3fe9694c02d44e1e706233e4dfd1f3f4897bfd8e7f20b0d362e31701","observation_id":"c20f00fc-6b09-4b32-8589-d1dc92199e52","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:24:00.940709Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:24:00.665723Z","title":"- Debater B acknowledges the benefits but emphasizes potential nutrient deficiencies , which can be mitigated with fortified foods and supplements as Debater A argues","venue":null,"work_id":"065b486b-c12d-4bcf-827f-2886950c829d","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.23820","last_updated":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T10:08:31.202217Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","title":"Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks","version":1},"reference_index":40,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:54.552425Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.23820"},"observation_digest":"sha256:0b29226f38dd8718b6086eef8a39bceaaca10560de65858df86245379b87ca85","observation_id":"9f60ae74-2164-4b5e-88c2-6d11d1eefe9e","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:24:00.760151Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:24:00.471329Z","title":"Vegetarianism can address these issues","venue":null,"work_id":"d138ca6c-ba74-46f8-b517-8c2ac7187223","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.23820","last_updated":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T10:08:31.202217Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","title":"Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks","version":1},"reference_index":41,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:54.641608Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.23820"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b3b24fb914ecd1b208a8424395d4d1697b825ae314bff694cfbcb634973c821f","observation_id":"b2f87fa3-98dd-4bee-ad9c-7c36db336010","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:24:00.545549Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:24:00.308569Z","title":"Health benefits : Reduced risk of chronic diseases","venue":null,"work_id":"8017217b-e006-49f6-845e-18ed2fb61129","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.23820","last_updated":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T10:08:31.202217Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","title":"Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks","version":1},"reference_index":42,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:54.732572Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.23820"},"observation_digest":"sha256:395036a9edec7ea1867c49533dbc3df94049ce83c929a57fa5e2db1ab4ad9916","observation_id":"b378906f-d509-4220-9b8e-c8a7e299c426","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:24:00.387523Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:24:00.074307Z","title":"Studies showing lower rates of heart disease , diabetes , and cancer in vegetarians","venue":null,"work_id":"663d63e1-aafa-4331-b49b-eef5dd9189fd","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.23820","last_updated":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T10:08:31.202217Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","title":"Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks","version":1},"reference_index":43,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:54.809964Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.23820"},"observation_digest":"sha256:d8cc5fe749f00d55452d20def77d3d5ba2645abbf96741aa6ab4ca05dad1f684","observation_id":"6ffaeb5d-981a-4e18-afc1-308754cf88a8","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:24:00.159499Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:59.854893Z","title":"A balanced diet , including both plant and animal products , is essential for many individuals","venue":null,"work_id":"930e7779-5a53-4d2b-8db3-5f0575a080a0","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.23820","last_updated":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T10:08:31.202217Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","title":"Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks","version":1},"reference_index":44,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:54.882287Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.23820"},"observation_digest":"sha256:5adad1938b45815a77eec8fcf812b3bba76d35c39d171ed7c946223ff25d498c","observation_id":"91ea1871-2500-4858-9b4e-48e291a58c30","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:59.969331Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:59.582633Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"8e7ba7fc-d724-4ac2-9a31-67e58d20c815","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.23820","last_updated":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T10:08:31.202217Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","title":"Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks","version":1},"reference_index":45,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:55.005224Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.23820"},"observation_digest":"sha256:034c99991d3df666503432aec15f92dce709cb5d0896ceccb9f36291b4b744a7","observation_id":"4423ddec-262f-48a9-bc98-7722a7aadc0a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:59.691057Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:59.403749Z","title":"- Improved livestock farming techniques reducing environmental damage","venue":null,"work_id":"e02ff19d-fb67-405e-8d74-930092936cda","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.23820","last_updated":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T10:08:31.202217Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","title":"Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks","version":1},"reference_index":46,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:55.101106Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.23820"},"observation_digest":"sha256:396782f48abed659c5ab34cdfa18042e2241a70f12e3cb57f64d8ba7f8089308","observation_id":"2ddf008e-8663-4a8b-95a9-e2601d2bb7cd","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:59.474524Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:59.219908Z","title":"- Overestimating the effectiveness of sustainable livestock farming","venue":null,"work_id":"93499422-3537-4997-be29-66d53784a20b","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.23820","last_updated":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T10:08:31.202217Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","title":"Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks","version":1},"reference_index":47,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:55.169944Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.23820"},"observation_digest":"sha256:8e581fa8077f1608fe3d0f226e009ce14e1e9403edbcc621ff8eddc4012e850b","observation_id":"f42632c3-3a49-4c05-a400-9fe77f46cbcc","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:59.286217Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:58.999617Z","title":"- Point out that sustainable livestock farming is not widespread and still poses significant environmental issues","venue":null,"work_id":"d856e77b-2d6b-4e39-bafd-970757972142","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.23820","last_updated":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T10:08:31.202217Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","title":"Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks","version":1},"reference_index":48,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:55.251766Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.23820"},"observation_digest":"sha256:3dcb32a1c21663de990c5598d372bee6e9f194e8a7c535c3a90cc83e779d69f1","observation_id":"6f4b7293-350d-435d-9155-fd6117ef4874","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:59.085126Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:58.793063Z","title":"- Data showing the limited impact of sustainable livestock farming","venue":null,"work_id":"5570c598-a084-4740-99c9-55c4e436a679","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.23820","last_updated":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T10:08:31.202217Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","title":"Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks","version":1},"reference_index":49,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:55.391553Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.23820"},"observation_digest":"sha256:0c0033a963eb3c363bcd25ef14fb74ef54feba4d40263e3b8f8da12de081164a","observation_id":"d2ff8f3c-3cb9-4d31-8f87-7d29d66f14b3","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:58.896969Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:58.584496Z","title":"- Environmental impact of livestock farming can be mitigated by sustainable practices","venue":null,"work_id":"bdc814f3-4da3-46a8-87a2-68fb60857c2a","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.23820","last_updated":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T10:08:31.202217Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","title":"Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks","version":1},"reference_index":50,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:55.484000Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.23820"},"observation_digest":"sha256:bc86190eb7849785a244289f05b7a444d3c5dc0fd2ef805a7101f95fd65e5c9f","observation_id":"2be4732f-8c8d-47e8-bfa0-d334e9b4fac2","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:58.639251Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:58.359258Z","title":"- Emphasize the improvements in sustainable farming practices and lower - impact meat alternatives","venue":null,"work_id":"42629072-9416-46b1-9eb4-bb3a3f66f3aa","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.23820","last_updated":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T10:08:31.202217Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","title":"Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks","version":1},"reference_index":51,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:55.602716Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.23820"},"observation_digest":"sha256:d718f3a92d0da78b4fd2f6a1dc6ff9c070e81512a44606bd1859b4f46764e2d3","observation_id":"d82e4db8-9c56-4cf8-8a04-6e11c52ff28f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:58.481379Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:58.140936Z","title":"- Evidence of sustainable livestock practices","venue":null,"work_id":"904325f8-8ec8-4117-9872-d70d23094f6f","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.23820","last_updated":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T10:08:31.202217Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","title":"Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks","version":1},"reference_index":52,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:55.701122Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.23820"},"observation_digest":"sha256:2737f8d05ecfaaf280085507efe4f457411955d648924ecbdd71cc41979f18e8","observation_id":"c8eca3db-7460-40d3-a814-2ca968ebec09","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:58.223451Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:57.918809Z","title":"- Sustainable livestock practices reduce environmental impact","venue":null,"work_id":"6726f872-45d2-4b89-b453-05c429b3c375","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.23820","last_updated":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T10:08:31.202217Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","title":"Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks","version":1},"reference_index":53,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:55.771483Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.23820"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c4c6d730f31413d31a3cf79b6879387459b43848588ac179d4e9ee5f3aea05f2","observation_id":"b8d450aa-7c33-4977-af96-c17692594ec7","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:58.035083Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:57.705386Z","title":"- Sustainable livestock practices are not as effective and widespread as needed","venue":null,"work_id":"24d7bd52-2e4a-410d-b62a-cc2e69f15d84","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.23820","last_updated":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T10:08:31.202217Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","title":"Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks","version":1},"reference_index":54,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:55.883892Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.23820"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f218ffc79a4e0ea520e6434536831468a99045a1fcf72c86034839d7b4345214","observation_id":"a137c67a-4015-4e0a-afb5-51a710f8ce98","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:57.816775Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:57.532353Z","title":"- Studies on the actual environmental impact of ‘‘ sustainable ’ ’ livestock practices","venue":null,"work_id":"c047dec6-5351-45c3-93d1-180712e46880","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.23820","last_updated":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T10:08:31.202217Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","title":"Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks","version":1},"reference_index":55,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:55.960083Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.23820"},"observation_digest":"sha256:77ef6d676275b4d54e1e2380109b7cf3b60f1dd743cb5a882ddc7c29bdb3e1f6","observation_id":"e1b2a6a8-833a-4012-82ea-6f80c7c62f57","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:57.606934Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:57.332546Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"8fa7639c-c698-4705-8419-20e7bfc27311","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.23820","last_updated":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T10:08:31.202217Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","title":"Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks","version":1},"reference_index":56,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:56.048395Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.23820"},"observation_digest":"sha256:76f1126697c0dbee7a0492c1372e8e7b642570d7bf7ff7b4c811d320c77953a2","observation_id":"404a1f7d-39f5-4a31-bebf-715c691c9046","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:57.413271Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:57.097455Z","title":"- Sustainable livestock practices are growing , and innovations are reducing environmental footprints effectively","venue":null,"work_id":"91204802-2dc2-4a2e-b3bc-2104316e48ba","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.23820","last_updated":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T10:08:31.202217Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","title":"Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks","version":1},"reference_index":57,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:56.157801Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.23820"},"observation_digest":"sha256:eecf5fc3fd0fd07f396ee7cd57bd805a658b9bc067854c3d2d502ec5641b6196","observation_id":"107a26db-ab5f-43f9-9715-1138da8db922","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:57.225097Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:56.929380Z","title":"You should always know why you do things","venue":null,"work_id":"1a375cab-513b-432b-a392-14d1e54459c4","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.23820","last_updated":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T10:08:31.202217Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","title":"Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks","version":1},"reference_index":58,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:56.226957Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.23820"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b1b06fbb08be6804d3eaf8eec66c35ce5f8ca5eeea1d52d994ae54bd687f6a88","observation_id":"ada4928e-8213-427e-a0c8-3fa78f8c54af","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:57.002755Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2409.11239","last_updated":"2024-10-02T11:07:14Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T22:43:10.459020Z","submitted_at":"2024-09-17T14:40:02Z","title":"LLM-as-a-Judge & Reward Model: What They Can and Cannot Do","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2409.11239","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:51.778830Z","title":"In Proceedings of the 24th Annual Inter- national ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval , SIGIR ’01, page 66–73, New York, NY , USA","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.23820","last_updated":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T10:08:31.202217Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","title":"Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks","version":1},"reference_index":2001,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:51.778830Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2409.11239","citing_paper":"/paper/2505.23820"},"observation_digest":"sha256:cde132b30770f0350577d8314a6bcb6d40f82f03165ff0d1e46f89b523f4d78e","observation_id":"fad9e950-0625-4afc-9a8e-724ea7bc4716","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:51.778830Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2407.19594","last_updated":"2024-07-30T01:38:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T14:27:39.592405Z","submitted_at":"2024-07-28T21:58:28Z","title":"Meta-Rewarding Language Models: Self-Improving Alignment with LLM-as-a-Meta-Judge","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2407.19594","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:51.799718Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.23820","last_updated":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T10:08:31.202217Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","title":"Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks","version":1},"reference_index":2018,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:51.799718Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2407.19594","citing_paper":"/paper/2505.23820"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c9e644df1249dc8a178e37e2f4596ead54a872f4b113fc9595e1561c80892bdf","observation_id":"a01fedc5-c6b4-4bc9-9208-1279ac3466e3","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:51.799718Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2407.03479","last_updated":"2024-07-03T19:53:47Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T23:29:17.040194Z","submitted_at":"2024-07-03T19:53:47Z","title":"Human-Centered Design Recommendations for LLM-as-a-Judge","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2407.03479","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:51.588167Z","title":"Advances in neural in- formation processing systems, 35:27730–27744","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.23820","last_updated":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T10:08:31.202217Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","title":"Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks","version":1},"reference_index":2022,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:51.588167Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2407.03479","citing_paper":"/paper/2505.23820"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e86298057b3f949b596d69f43e6f7a79e3a5c9c0cc3a0b6abf83275ba944a6bb","observation_id":"487ff4ce-77a9-460c-ae37-99a31a85c4a9","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:51.588167Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2410.07991","last_updated":"2025-06-12T10:34:56Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T22:26:16.346338Z","submitted_at":"2024-10-10T14:48:57Z","title":"Human and LLM Biases in Hate Speech Annotations: A Socio-Demographic Analysis of Annotators and Targets","version":6},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2410.07991","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:51.382539Z","title":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 120(30):e2305016120","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.23820","last_updated":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T10:08:31.202217Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","title":"Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks","version":1},"reference_index":2023,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:51.382539Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2410.07991","citing_paper":"/paper/2505.23820"},"observation_digest":"sha256:3bdf5c8c023ee4adf6d15c3a124f8b8c028757b875d69c90b042fb5687c2e343","observation_id":"2b02863d-5263-42b6-8999-d83640697296","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:51.382539Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2406.11657","last_updated":"2024-06-17T15:41:30Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T01:58:53.395366Z","submitted_at":"2024-06-17T15:41:30Z","title":"Can LLM be a Personalized Judge?","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2406.11657","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:51.198521Z","title":"Florian E Dorner, Vivian Y Nastl, and Moritz Hardt","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.23820","last_updated":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T10:08:31.202217Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","title":"Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks","version":1},"reference_index":2024,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:51.198521Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2406.11657","citing_paper":"/paper/2505.23820"},"observation_digest":"sha256:611460f6bc76f500d7f3da8efe7c8adaa1860362b25a043fad87df99bbfc9874","observation_id":"37ef0adc-7ad1-47a0-a10f-9c515876f026","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:23:51.198521Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}}],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.23820","last_updated":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","latest_version":1,"primary_category":"cs.CL","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T10:08:31.202217Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-28T01:31:54Z","title":"Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":58,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":1,"metadata_mismatch":1,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":23,"verified_exact":0,"verified_fuzzy":33},"total_outbound_references":58},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 16 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 58 of 58 outbound references and 0 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2505.23820."}