{"as_of":"2026-08-20T09:10:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:57c62011adf837fda9b32c4b66378dd8e3e2cf17e2a2669c539ef088f9031c01","coverage":[{"denominator":3,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":3,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T05:11:38.091562Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":3,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":3,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":0,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"cited_works","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2506.09264/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2506.09264/integrity","json":"/paper/2506.09264/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2506.09264"},"outbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T05:11:38.177421Z","title":"The complexity of some edge deletion problems","venue":null,"work_id":"0c572a93-746d-4256-b9c6-dbbcbdb4b076","year":1988},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.09264","last_updated":"2025-06-10T21:56:51Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T17:42:07.797551Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-10T21:56:51Z","title":"The bunkbed conjecture still holds for cactus graphs and for graphs with certain biconnected components","version":1},"reference_index":1,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T05:11:38.080248Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.09264"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c01e44885f9fd4c06ba53acc84cc5c02dbbecde0b8994255ab17420c699fce3a","observation_id":"ad71e7ea-4a75-4705-9719-6122823c9970","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T05:11:38.182516Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:54.927442+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2406.01790","last_updated":"2024-06-03T21:13:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T13:46:32.068552Z","submitted_at":"2024-06-03T21:13:50Z","title":"The bunkbed conjecture is not robust to generalisation","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2406.01790","doi":null,"metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"2406.01790","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T05:11:38.130067Z","title":"The bunkbed conjecture is not robust to generalisation","venue":"math.CO","work_id":"e0ce77f8-e11c-47a4-be8f-864ed280c7c4","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.09264","last_updated":"2025-06-10T21:56:51Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T17:42:07.797551Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-10T21:56:51Z","title":"The bunkbed conjecture still holds for cactus graphs and for graphs with certain biconnected components","version":1},"reference_index":3,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T05:11:38.091562Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2406.01790","citing_paper":"/paper/2506.09264"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f9b00616c82a5bec8b32528a25e8dd7564d1b99067277b9b6ac159a38cfa228f","observation_id":"4a0dd5ce-fc7d-467e-a5e6-b1d4f4b7d4aa","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T05:11:38.137475Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:54.927442+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2410.02545","last_updated":"2024-10-03T14:48:55Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-19T17:06:15.233358Z","submitted_at":"2024-10-03T14:48:55Z","title":"The bunkbed conjecture is false","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2410.02545","doi":null,"metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"2410.02545","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T05:11:38.159977Z","title":"The bunkbed conjecture is false","venue":"math.CO","work_id":"34878a4d-22a1-4b7e-986e-65f30d589852","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.09264","last_updated":"2025-06-10T21:56:51Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T17:42:07.797551Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-10T21:56:51Z","title":"The bunkbed conjecture still holds for cactus graphs and for graphs with certain biconnected components","version":1},"reference_index":362,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T05:11:38.086114Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2410.02545","citing_paper":"/paper/2506.09264"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c5db82f5348b53198c3612beba8cc11f81894fb09f3bb3b2bed7cbd60c0bcad4","observation_id":"140adf9c-2ab2-4bf5-9035-f11d4fe3d864","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T05:11:38.165273Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:54.927442+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}}],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.09264","last_updated":"2025-06-10T21:56:51Z","latest_version":1,"primary_category":"math.PR","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T17:42:07.797551Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-10T21:56:51Z","title":"The bunkbed conjecture still holds for cactus graphs and for graphs with certain biconnected components"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":3,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":0,"verified_exact":2,"verified_fuzzy":1},"total_outbound_references":3},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:54.927442+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 20 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 3 of 3 outbound references and 0 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2506.09264."}