{"as_of":"2026-08-08T04:09:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:04c5509d88052ec0ca3f4dbbeb1aaaa29528b7d40c875d2d2f65ab604a491bc0","coverage":[{"denominator":48,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":48,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:11.527373Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":48,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":48,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":0,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"cited_works","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2506.19234/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2506.19234/integrity","json":"/paper/2506.19234/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2506.19234"},"outbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:06.774164Z","title":"Deep industrial image anomaly detection: A survey,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.19234","last_updated":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T00:13:26.847514Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","title":"Quantitative Benchmarking of Anomaly Detection Methods in Digital Pathology","version":1},"reference_index":1,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:06.774164Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.19234"},"observation_digest":"sha256:248802249081f0b32d8a3cf469a15885ef4be213e9797f821638bded07df22af","observation_id":"7a31ca36-fc22-4bf3-af97-3b8bc53fe887","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:06.774164Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:17.586787Z","title":"Machine learning for anomaly detection: A systematic review,","venue":null,"work_id":"de752e71-d454-48aa-bbb0-51fecad5d151","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.19234","last_updated":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T00:13:26.847514Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","title":"Quantitative Benchmarking of Anomaly Detection Methods in Digital Pathology","version":1},"reference_index":2,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:06.851895Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.19234"},"observation_digest":"sha256:ee9a8d94b0fba2e257ad431932b68a656cf898e779e19e9bc3c752ed6cfd5001","observation_id":"e6f3f77d-a3b4-4e2f-9973-e75d44a46a92","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:17.726320Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:17.411441Z","title":"Using an anomaly detection approach for the segmentation of colorectal cancer tumors in whole slide images,","venue":null,"work_id":"b83ffdfb-1083-4a72-85ed-0a79897de1a1","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.19234","last_updated":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T00:13:26.847514Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","title":"Quantitative Benchmarking of Anomaly Detection Methods in Digital Pathology","version":1},"reference_index":3,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:06.959596Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.19234"},"observation_digest":"sha256:88bf00350a8e4b35ef13c022fe98a80d92b2234be7555d5e84a2529a3d435460","observation_id":"398381ee-ab62-4611-9a8e-804ac5bbadbc","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:17.497412Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:17.282848Z","title":"Learning image representations for anomaly detection: application to discovery of histological alterations in drug development,","venue":null,"work_id":"6a1364f2-139e-4245-b322-86d3bdab9e3a","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.19234","last_updated":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T00:13:26.847514Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","title":"Quantitative Benchmarking of Anomaly Detection Methods in Digital Pathology","version":1},"reference_index":4,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:07.058448Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.19234"},"observation_digest":"sha256:537892333b71941be56e4b40223c16c97c654726fa2038b94be479e66a75a0aa","observation_id":"0282ece7-7aa8-4b59-b8a7-e5a4dba89927","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:17.338944Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:17.124133Z","title":"Automated anomaly detection in histology images using deep learning,","venue":null,"work_id":"ce455455-5f8b-4dac-ae6a-2a19de9e31bc","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.19234","last_updated":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T00:13:26.847514Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","title":"Quantitative Benchmarking of Anomaly Detection Methods in Digital Pathology","version":1},"reference_index":5,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:07.118257Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.19234"},"observation_digest":"sha256:0b17b609b2b9068cab12cbc15d157384bf0b209a84df61b9b0eaf2649ac3eacf","observation_id":"f6b35fe9-e6f2-43ec-9aa4-bfb2dc269694","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:17.185140Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:16.898638Z","title":"A survey on unsupervised anomaly detection algorithms for industrial images,","venue":null,"work_id":"4fb92358-d70b-4b70-83e0-da39cc3b9492","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.19234","last_updated":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T00:13:26.847514Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","title":"Quantitative Benchmarking of Anomaly Detection Methods in Digital Pathology","version":1},"reference_index":6,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:07.206355Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.19234"},"observation_digest":"sha256:3fe5a8fd557c8f0c47fa58faedebb59889c41979f715e01e6d705041baed5322","observation_id":"1ace07b6-23d2-4a6a-8522-2562d877201a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:16.958940Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2401.16402","last_updated":"2024-01-29T18:41:21Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T17:22:03.122430Z","submitted_at":"2024-01-29T18:41:21Z","title":"A Survey on Visual Anomaly Detection: Challenge, Approach, and Prospect","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2401.16402","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:07.273869Z","title":"A survey on visual anomaly detection: Challenge, approach, and prospect,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.19234","last_updated":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T00:13:26.847514Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","title":"Quantitative Benchmarking of Anomaly Detection Methods in Digital Pathology","version":1},"reference_index":7,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:07.273869Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2401.16402","citing_paper":"/paper/2506.19234"},"observation_digest":"sha256:5dc2801e41c948b88a4367c5dd36f57b7679a4e8d132055e9d96ff92ad7cfa81","observation_id":"fb3c09f8-c92a-4682-9b20-820db08f938d","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:07.273869Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:16.761561Z","title":"Medianomaly: A comparative study of anomaly detection in medical images,","venue":null,"work_id":"5c5ca55b-27d5-4835-957b-eba88f269fb1","year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.19234","last_updated":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T00:13:26.847514Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","title":"Quantitative Benchmarking of Anomaly Detection Methods in Digital Pathology","version":1},"reference_index":8,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:07.402648Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.19234"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a95dda99dbeda39ecffcbddc453d23313eebb9faea7d7a99ab622a9a7e2954a8","observation_id":"f857d157-bca7-4454-82a2-6c7732d9b2ba","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:16.828514Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:16.655589Z","title":"Unsupervised pathology detection: a deep dive into the state of the art,","venue":null,"work_id":"8dbc7e0d-4beb-45a2-82fc-a470718e95b4","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.19234","last_updated":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T00:13:26.847514Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","title":"Quantitative Benchmarking of Anomaly Detection Methods in Digital Pathology","version":1},"reference_index":9,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:07.486539Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.19234"},"observation_digest":"sha256:df21c198a5e04c191fda8e6e40274411ce150851dcfd618d20903b32ab1893de","observation_id":"6eac206e-ef00-4362-8018-47d2d60f5685","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:16.696804Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:16.532222Z","title":"Bmad: Benchmarks for medical anomaly detection,","venue":null,"work_id":"db72eba3-8b5f-47f5-ac84-666e0c46b20d","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.19234","last_updated":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T00:13:26.847514Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","title":"Quantitative Benchmarking of Anomaly Detection Methods in Digital Pathology","version":1},"reference_index":10,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:07.564791Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.19234"},"observation_digest":"sha256:0556cc9b16d1c9a0887aafb1de560b395806dad90e66e3ab1bb51e2304e22720","observation_id":"7cc687f8-13c6-4051-b3b8-270d258712a5","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:16.590322Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:07.666630Z","title":"A unified model for multi-class anomaly detection,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.19234","last_updated":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T00:13:26.847514Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","title":"Quantitative Benchmarking of Anomaly Detection Methods in Digital Pathology","version":1},"reference_index":11,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:07.666630Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.19234"},"observation_digest":"sha256:22896f894cded39b167a189904947ba0b5d57bd5f964ba5d4fc7bccc655582c4","observation_id":"53bc383c-6d81-48d1-97b5-e16b589bb9ab","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:07.666630Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:07.763654Z","title":"Draem-a discriminatively trained reconstruction embedding for surface anomaly detection,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.19234","last_updated":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T00:13:26.847514Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","title":"Quantitative Benchmarking of Anomaly Detection Methods in Digital Pathology","version":1},"reference_index":12,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:07.763654Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.19234"},"observation_digest":"sha256:eadfdc11545c5bc1877babbb0a2d1b79db639d9217c6f2941465eed0ec97f19b","observation_id":"8d9c3941-d3b6-4049-8c0d-2ebfdedc6479","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:07.763654Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:16.365771Z","title":"Deep one-class classifi- cation via interpolated gaussian descriptor,","venue":null,"work_id":"84f6fda9-821e-48e0-8ec9-446e314a1563","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.19234","last_updated":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T00:13:26.847514Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","title":"Quantitative Benchmarking of Anomaly Detection Methods in Digital Pathology","version":1},"reference_index":13,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:07.855322Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.19234"},"observation_digest":"sha256:af49f7b1f9ac1a1a574834bbb36e9e441eca4250b703e110b3bebc96c9277d6e","observation_id":"dc602954-6eca-4f69-b82f-55853b0196d8","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:16.446561Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:16.231567Z","title":"Denoising autoencoders for unsupervised anomaly detection in brain mri,","venue":null,"work_id":"02e2d678-28c2-4c3a-a13c-5ee31360f91c","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.19234","last_updated":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T00:13:26.847514Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","title":"Quantitative Benchmarking of Anomaly Detection Methods in Digital Pathology","version":1},"reference_index":14,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:08.002471Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.19234"},"observation_digest":"sha256:524b4f372697cafeae9748e9815501cf46c37f828c362f11a60e31b37db53a0e","observation_id":"6ae70bc9-33c9-4622-9e88-9d386455916b","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:16.296874Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:16.095084Z","title":"Constrained unsupervised anomaly segmentation,","venue":null,"work_id":"80be7299-35a5-4095-8cde-205a227458bb","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.19234","last_updated":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T00:13:26.847514Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","title":"Quantitative Benchmarking of Anomaly Detection Methods in Digital Pathology","version":1},"reference_index":15,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:08.349865Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.19234"},"observation_digest":"sha256:969165df198c45c4d64f005ee3608e9374b0736406f44c0a20480f14677b622b","observation_id":"96fde5f4-69a2-483b-8278-9654ba606d5d","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:16.173921Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:15.908564Z","title":"Ganomaly: Semi- supervised anomaly detection via adversarial training,","venue":null,"work_id":"0702f433-917c-4173-916e-e38fe0f68956","year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.19234","last_updated":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T00:13:26.847514Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","title":"Quantitative Benchmarking of Anomaly Detection Methods in Digital Pathology","version":1},"reference_index":16,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:08.597407Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.19234"},"observation_digest":"sha256:0c8949d8ff46e384c69daae72e3680a968828527cc64d39dd12496781cf2c25f","observation_id":"b1432ec4-b8e8-4238-99ab-0372897291de","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:15.973811Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:15.687989Z","title":"Unsupervised anomaly localization with structural feature-autoencoders,","venue":null,"work_id":"a8f1a9ba-53a1-49b4-b467-6ff1e6327763","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.19234","last_updated":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T00:13:26.847514Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","title":"Quantitative Benchmarking of Anomaly Detection Methods in Digital Pathology","version":1},"reference_index":17,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:08.699834Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.19234"},"observation_digest":"sha256:28ec8c9c063079ba7c894283d32661961ea4537f40c391c64832c1992903cddc","observation_id":"2a1046d3-4315-4ec2-acf1-65e6d302cff0","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:15.800835Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2012.07122","last_updated":"2020-12-13T18:30:51Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T10:23:56.152886Z","submitted_at":"2020-12-13T18:30:51Z","title":"DFR: Deep Feature Reconstruction for Unsupervised Anomaly Segmentation","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2012.07122","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:08.767273Z","title":"Dfr: Deep feature reconstruction for unsupervised anomaly segmentation,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2012},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.19234","last_updated":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T00:13:26.847514Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","title":"Quantitative Benchmarking of Anomaly Detection Methods in Digital Pathology","version":1},"reference_index":18,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:08.767273Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2012.07122","citing_paper":"/paper/2506.19234"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b6b2b91ba73ec802bfcd592ad70b2606e0c4e85614cf5ed7f674a6ffe6d18377","observation_id":"4d22d730-9193-4e16-9c37-32fa0c50fc26","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:08.767273Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:15.567106Z","title":"Trans- former based models for unsupervised anomaly segmentation in brain mr images,","venue":null,"work_id":"e31d5b18-2772-4b5d-8179-aef823f37189","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.19234","last_updated":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T00:13:26.847514Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","title":"Quantitative Benchmarking of Anomaly Detection Methods in Digital Pathology","version":1},"reference_index":19,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:08.862533Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.19234"},"observation_digest":"sha256:787fdb8d62a622728918bf7ea1754256a36f2cfee5e309f7f5d7a97e1a7062c5","observation_id":"cef77813-6475-457e-ba63-2116b42e4bed","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:15.626799Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:15.417865Z","title":"Panda: Adapting pretrained features for anomaly detection and segmentation,","venue":null,"work_id":"0027b71e-5bf3-42d1-91f7-6316fb71e12f","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.19234","last_updated":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T00:13:26.847514Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","title":"Quantitative Benchmarking of Anomaly Detection Methods in Digital Pathology","version":1},"reference_index":20,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:08.931320Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.19234"},"observation_digest":"sha256:337f8154fd8d754407be9b2e3a49f2e583b3b21e6bf0d75d1ca1564a28ca7bd2","observation_id":"56241f9c-b960-4a5a-9c1b-b590bc5892ef","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:15.498448Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:15.271724Z","title":"Towards total recall in industrial anomaly detection,","venue":null,"work_id":"d65638cd-7c4e-415c-8e4a-418237527722","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.19234","last_updated":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T00:13:26.847514Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","title":"Quantitative Benchmarking of Anomaly Detection Methods in Digital Pathology","version":1},"reference_index":21,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:09.053028Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.19234"},"observation_digest":"sha256:760ea5257124c73504ff77ec64ff0ad4dfa60b2135f9de3639b7a9505dcf304a","observation_id":"76b2afd5-4ddb-4883-9365-db35a98ef8ff","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:15.337936Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:15.138678Z","title":"Cfa: Coupled-hypersphere-based fea- ture adaptation for target-oriented anomaly localization,","venue":null,"work_id":"0a184894-efe5-41f7-b2d9-f72b9aa44769","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.19234","last_updated":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T00:13:26.847514Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","title":"Quantitative Benchmarking of Anomaly Detection Methods in Digital Pathology","version":1},"reference_index":22,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:09.148911Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.19234"},"observation_digest":"sha256:22215eacd15c753398977b8e3b8802b1663ef4edc8b04b05f6813c0bbfe27f66","observation_id":"42f340f0-d472-4dd5-8239-6ac8e3e5488f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:15.193787Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:14.915526Z","title":"DFKDE - Anomalib Documentation,","venue":null,"work_id":"7f8bd325-5712-40ef-9b18-b38a9d85a854","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.19234","last_updated":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T00:13:26.847514Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","title":"Quantitative Benchmarking of Anomaly Detection Methods in Digital Pathology","version":1},"reference_index":23,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:09.217005Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.19234"},"observation_digest":"sha256:bca0d61724ed3906278ed39b0b9a97d81d7dcfe230820e1eab555edca6e7c2b0","observation_id":"6b2e7ee2-529c-4f6b-99a9-d7e7455a7e41","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:15.026600Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1909.11786","last_updated":"2019-09-25T21:41:56Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T08:24:38.792721Z","submitted_at":"2019-09-25T21:41:56Z","title":"Probabilistic Modeling of Deep Features for Out-of-Distribution and Adversarial Detection","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"1909.11786","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:09.299107Z","title":"Probabilistic mod- eling of deep features for out-of-distribution and adversarial detection,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":1909},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.19234","last_updated":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T00:13:26.847514Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","title":"Quantitative Benchmarking of Anomaly Detection Methods in Digital Pathology","version":1},"reference_index":24,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:09.299107Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/1909.11786","citing_paper":"/paper/2506.19234"},"observation_digest":"sha256:4590d8e71aa34e75115ada3014a2843fd88e40e71b88fb98672a7e32cf48c1e7","observation_id":"6804b814-83ee-4485-870f-5c6538818245","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:09.299107Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:14.707475Z","title":"Padim: a patch dis- tribution modeling framework for anomaly detection and localization,","venue":null,"work_id":"2584f111-db11-48e6-a9bb-e64527fb687a","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.19234","last_updated":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T00:13:26.847514Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","title":"Quantitative Benchmarking of Anomaly Detection Methods in Digital Pathology","version":1},"reference_index":25,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:09.400999Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.19234"},"observation_digest":"sha256:077c312996b38ff29b127c4d9547765697f57e96876e11b345f2ec589150d26f","observation_id":"fa14b223-038e-489b-9247-99ed22cb20c2","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:14.787229Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:09.504097Z","title":"Anomaly detection via reverse distillation from one-class embedding,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.19234","last_updated":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T00:13:26.847514Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","title":"Quantitative Benchmarking of Anomaly Detection Methods in Digital Pathology","version":1},"reference_index":26,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:09.504097Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.19234"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a9437463bd189ae288dfcac48cf1dbc084d5e4ecd90394a56a9b56e6b1ad1339","observation_id":"9ebe4a64-1537-4f78-9a2d-1808d5364a27","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:09.504097Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:14.559686Z","title":"Revisiting reverse distillation for anomaly detection,","venue":null,"work_id":"4f2690f5-036b-4266-a106-830b51793d3a","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.19234","last_updated":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T00:13:26.847514Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","title":"Quantitative Benchmarking of Anomaly Detection Methods in Digital Pathology","version":1},"reference_index":27,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:09.613578Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.19234"},"observation_digest":"sha256:feb42137aedcdc82ca13cd90b0399f22c4f5a7fdfd5603baf0044b54a5b33322","observation_id":"67ea07d2-c8a1-48d7-9bce-23f36d549e49","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:14.611331Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2103.04257","last_updated":"2021-10-28T09:17:34Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:30.967037Z","submitted_at":"2021-03-07T04:25:04Z","title":"Student-Teacher Feature Pyramid Matching for Anomaly Detection","version":3},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2103.04257","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:09.695307Z","title":"Student-teacher feature pyra- mid matching for anomaly detection,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.19234","last_updated":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T00:13:26.847514Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","title":"Quantitative Benchmarking of Anomaly Detection Methods in Digital Pathology","version":1},"reference_index":28,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:09.695307Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2103.04257","citing_paper":"/paper/2506.19234"},"observation_digest":"sha256:20fcc90048f88a4fe6339bc40f6b24428bf43a66459bfbb4e8530282f733665b","observation_id":"031d3db1-e059-47a5-8471-9e11712f13ac","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:09.695307Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:14.369684Z","title":"Recontrast: Domain-specific anomaly detection via contrastive reconstruction,","venue":null,"work_id":"e89ad2f9-3522-4009-b107-27f99e35bd59","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.19234","last_updated":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T00:13:26.847514Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","title":"Quantitative Benchmarking of Anomaly Detection Methods in Digital Pathology","version":1},"reference_index":29,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:09.792498Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.19234"},"observation_digest":"sha256:8fa5951c4450da632e506c465374b7d3dd24ce892fa723ce3aa5aefc2fb151d7","observation_id":"0d522c3a-d8f1-43f9-ac33-ef8e76033fed","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:14.437613Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2111.07677","last_updated":"2021-11-16T06:33:39Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T12:08:32.226011Z","submitted_at":"2021-11-15T11:15:02Z","title":"FastFlow: Unsupervised Anomaly Detection and Localization via 2D Normalizing Flows","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2111.07677","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:09.903371Z","title":"Fastflow: Unsupervised anomaly detection and localization via 2d normalizing flows,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.19234","last_updated":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T00:13:26.847514Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","title":"Quantitative Benchmarking of Anomaly Detection Methods in Digital Pathology","version":1},"reference_index":30,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:09.903371Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2111.07677","citing_paper":"/paper/2506.19234"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c0961d55279e939a680ba55a2a7bb8c9dac74cad95ac3ebff5113bcbe1248483","observation_id":"2f695de4-13b0-4895-b022-cd3a415239c8","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:09.903371Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:14.171225Z","title":"Cflow-ad: Real-time unsu- pervised anomaly detection with localization via conditional normalizing flows,","venue":null,"work_id":"07113da6-ad45-4bf9-a738-960d32570d00","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.19234","last_updated":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T00:13:26.847514Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","title":"Quantitative Benchmarking of Anomaly Detection Methods in Digital Pathology","version":1},"reference_index":31,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:09.982962Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.19234"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e5cb4681f419c4b6829447eb2e632f081c94df150d0825c208dec027d6c73798","observation_id":"171e16ef-0075-4ed0-945d-672b861c932a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:14.241379Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:14.013434Z","title":"Fully convo- lutional cross-scale-flows for image-based defect detection,","venue":null,"work_id":"28f7c865-abf2-46bf-9e23-20c90aac0c0c","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.19234","last_updated":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T00:13:26.847514Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","title":"Quantitative Benchmarking of Anomaly Detection Methods in Digital Pathology","version":1},"reference_index":32,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:10.076930Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.19234"},"observation_digest":"sha256:fabfeae44725d88a4eaf8645c080520635d80f0bf7b57d89e70e4314b48055fa","observation_id":"7a6dbda3-254d-4481-b899-494baaecd693","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:14.062470Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:10.159442Z","title":"Cutpaste: Self-supervised learning for anomaly detection and localization,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.19234","last_updated":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T00:13:26.847514Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","title":"Quantitative Benchmarking of Anomaly Detection Methods in Digital Pathology","version":1},"reference_index":33,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:10.159442Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.19234"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c56d9c0581bcf8b2d2dfce9903023457fb4028f80d0f9a0b11fef5fb659e02f0","observation_id":"8f968e44-3854-4b50-a151-9d59c09505d5","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:10.159442Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:13.800126Z","title":"Anomaly detection in medical imaging with deep perceptual autoen- coders,","venue":null,"work_id":"beef4937-1710-414f-b731-b4adaef4b18c","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.19234","last_updated":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T00:13:26.847514Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","title":"Quantitative Benchmarking of Anomaly Detection Methods in Digital Pathology","version":1},"reference_index":34,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:10.255715Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.19234"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b97637ce60da9b57ae2eeacac629434ddc9df2669604cac64b660e399086adeb","observation_id":"6d1cda12-f58d-41e7-9c2c-ee5d40b727ce","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:13.928302Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:13.605475Z","title":"Multiscale generative model using regularized skip-connections and perceptual loss for anomaly detection in toxicologic histopathology,","venue":null,"work_id":"d32e1906-cc3e-48f8-8b6a-01b34b63d354","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.19234","last_updated":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T00:13:26.847514Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","title":"Quantitative Benchmarking of Anomaly Detection Methods in Digital Pathology","version":1},"reference_index":35,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:10.324999Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.19234"},"observation_digest":"sha256:2393f3d54e9d78b8c5677d5eda8b205fc7d1345d2fc7bd54095069da9d264ce5","observation_id":"bac2a3c3-dc79-4c53-afab-e4af9a6d1e91","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:13.665052Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:13.376516Z","title":"Unsupervised anomaly detection in digital pathology using gans,","venue":null,"work_id":"3292b241-84d6-4f8d-86b6-3ea7244ce2bb","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.19234","last_updated":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T00:13:26.847514Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","title":"Quantitative Benchmarking of Anomaly Detection Methods in Digital Pathology","version":1},"reference_index":36,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:10.416860Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.19234"},"observation_digest":"sha256:181f5b2c35ebc0c9b1dfc90a3f09fed6fd0842359fcd2fbb8612bfdb7bb5e4fd","observation_id":"ec43cdd1-46d9-4163-9da1-12349518cb76","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:13.510176Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:10.513811Z","title":"Perceptual losses for real-time style transfer and super-resolution,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2016},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.19234","last_updated":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T00:13:26.847514Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","title":"Quantitative Benchmarking of Anomaly Detection Methods in Digital Pathology","version":1},"reference_index":37,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:10.513811Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.19234"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b2f7b22f1036aa5901bcac8f902bea1ef125ed3f76ea666772d54c01e5dd3994","observation_id":"59d0ac66-65fe-4c18-9f3d-0a2b52c19381","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:10.513811Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:13.183521Z","title":"Ganomaly: Semi-supervised anomaly detection via adversarial training,","venue":null,"work_id":"3fb63f6e-2459-4b71-a2d3-fe522b2fd01d","year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.19234","last_updated":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T00:13:26.847514Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","title":"Quantitative Benchmarking of Anomaly Detection Methods in Digital Pathology","version":1},"reference_index":38,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:10.605563Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.19234"},"observation_digest":"sha256:001d7cfc0d97286bd670cff0038f1523422de8c9a4132dfcef518b3ca48c561f","observation_id":"44c08e30-0ce9-4b89-b999-df1bd8551901","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:13.267236Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:13.005097Z","title":"Unsupervised anomaly detection on histopathology images using adversarial learning and simulated anomaly,","venue":null,"work_id":"0c81ea14-59e1-4ced-954b-02e537b29611","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.19234","last_updated":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T00:13:26.847514Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","title":"Quantitative Benchmarking of Anomaly Detection Methods in Digital Pathology","version":1},"reference_index":39,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:10.706325Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.19234"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a82ebb1a7b07168a427c808716a2fec845ce0aa047231e37d583f5c1c82b769e","observation_id":"4dde7b0f-5331-4e15-844c-a8a4155d7572","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:13.066209Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:10.840157Z","title":"Diffusion models for out-of-distribution detection in digital pathology,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.19234","last_updated":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T00:13:26.847514Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","title":"Quantitative Benchmarking of Anomaly Detection Methods in Digital Pathology","version":1},"reference_index":40,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:10.840157Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.19234"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a19ccd0afadfb410fcd5bd9304da4e2fc0d540b90629a6fd9c4b8dafb8ae4cfa","observation_id":"ceda4458-a22c-437f-ae88-6ed99e1fd769","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:10.840157Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:12.800486Z","title":"1399 h&e-stained sentinel lymph node sections of breast cancer patients: the camelyon dataset,","venue":null,"work_id":"7b7fc64e-db8c-48d6-bbcf-a7e1eca225c1","year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.19234","last_updated":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T00:13:26.847514Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","title":"Quantitative Benchmarking of Anomaly Detection Methods in Digital Pathology","version":1},"reference_index":41,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:10.909563Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.19234"},"observation_digest":"sha256:56f7664c126f6f9bdacf35d54ce72dbd9ae278fc4a517d912936d88113f731f1","observation_id":"f0dd2897-6724-4f73-b5cc-c2a94282feb4","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:12.891659Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:12.594986Z","title":"Diagnostic assessment of deep learning algorithms for detection of lymph node metastases in women with breast cancer,","venue":null,"work_id":"cee014f4-6df1-40be-8676-b22a065e9715","year":2017},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.19234","last_updated":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T00:13:26.847514Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","title":"Quantitative Benchmarking of Anomaly Detection Methods in Digital Pathology","version":1},"reference_index":42,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:10.993548Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.19234"},"observation_digest":"sha256:32bdcd5fa3faf38db1671db64f0298ae50f56974086368aae2bcd30617461fcc","observation_id":"e325a533-6671-460c-b064-0576b738277b","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:12.688242Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:12.399864Z","title":"A cross-platform informatics system for the gut cell atlas: integrating clinical, anatomical and histological data,","venue":null,"work_id":"2d8f1824-23bb-4c09-bf94-75ac99581134","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.19234","last_updated":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T00:13:26.847514Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","title":"Quantitative Benchmarking of Anomaly Detection Methods in Digital Pathology","version":1},"reference_index":43,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:11.071455Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.19234"},"observation_digest":"sha256:8fbe4c98e931b26a570ba55eca8795e5bc458d5d5f746f379d70bea7cd1169d7","observation_id":"678796e2-3bdd-4eab-aebc-5e0b21564d9a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:12.501409Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:12.211521Z","title":"Glo-in-one: holistic glomerular detection, segmentation, and lesion characterization with large-scale web image mining,","venue":null,"work_id":"69f55717-f030-4e2a-86f8-95e9eb5dbc99","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.19234","last_updated":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T00:13:26.847514Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","title":"Quantitative Benchmarking of Anomaly Detection Methods in Digital Pathology","version":1},"reference_index":44,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:11.161832Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.19234"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a56d334c6d7d7351971a145ce21fb34713f6a2264a6d65ead08aa2d4794969aa","observation_id":"d049223e-39bf-4fcc-9be6-3669828bb4a1","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:12.297030Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:12.044523Z","title":"Unitopatho, a labeled histopathological dataset for colorectal polyps classification and adenoma dysplasia grading,","venue":null,"work_id":"b3cc3cbf-04ff-4166-b146-96bac752908b","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.19234","last_updated":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T00:13:26.847514Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","title":"Quantitative Benchmarking of Anomaly Detection Methods in Digital Pathology","version":1},"reference_index":45,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:11.273229Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.19234"},"observation_digest":"sha256:837dfd37e256f7ae4f84b5687b32066806ac7cb81b16a359c2353ea91e53a06e","observation_id":"257c8338-65c7-4490-a20b-32efe1066930","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:12.115050Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:11.355561Z","title":"Mvtec ad–a comprehensive real-world dataset for unsupervised anomaly detection,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2019},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.19234","last_updated":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T00:13:26.847514Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","title":"Quantitative Benchmarking of Anomaly Detection Methods in Digital Pathology","version":1},"reference_index":46,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:11.355561Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.19234"},"observation_digest":"sha256:68f2c19ad6c2fa1fd8c2b66fad8944efd6518afc751747e2ea9e5b29ab671d54","observation_id":"7e5459c4-da0c-407b-808a-903c1dcddc57","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:11.355561Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:11.841898Z","title":"Feasibility of universal anomaly detection without knowing the abnormality in medical images,","venue":null,"work_id":"a8da4b18-0b8b-4ed3-b671-a0f31b7ac878","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.19234","last_updated":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T00:13:26.847514Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","title":"Quantitative Benchmarking of Anomaly Detection Methods in Digital Pathology","version":1},"reference_index":47,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:11.422369Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.19234"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a3f1471358ffe4d79ac5856e371dd970c05735274ccadc940cc7a74b5378b260","observation_id":"e6c6417d-e1f3-4066-b6ef-4cb76e561242","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:11.945133Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:11.668623Z","title":"Skip-ganomaly: Skip connected and adversarially trained encoder-decoder anomaly de- tection,","venue":null,"work_id":"2965da7f-090c-461b-a92b-cc8bb6128738","year":2019},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.19234","last_updated":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T00:13:26.847514Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","title":"Quantitative Benchmarking of Anomaly Detection Methods in Digital Pathology","version":1},"reference_index":48,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:11.527373Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.19234"},"observation_digest":"sha256:7a94d8559ab667e8b58f944129fe1f5d5ddaea712d6dc55b05ee4c0d28b1408c","observation_id":"5d958326-7810-4426-9481-7d218a1c357e","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:10:11.737906Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}}],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.19234","last_updated":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","latest_version":1,"primary_category":"eess.IV","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T00:13:26.847514Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-24T01:39:23Z","title":"Quantitative Benchmarking of Anomaly Detection Methods in Digital Pathology"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":48,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":13,"verified_exact":0,"verified_fuzzy":35},"total_outbound_references":48},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 8 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 48 of 48 outbound references and 0 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2506.19234."}