{"as_of":"2026-08-13T13:28:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:7ac5814ffaa93e98aa7b9ace934806ae0f57a97502e308ca032dbc8715a492ef","coverage":[{"denominator":114,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":100,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.322386Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":100,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":100,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":0,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"cited_works","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2506.22497/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2506.22497/integrity","json":"/paper/2506.22497/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"outbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:36.982798Z","title":"Predictable failures of replication: Evidence from a prediction market","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2019},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":1,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:36.982798Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:5bd305cf8aee3baafd1884a8a04cdd0e1074bc6de36c097d823639c5bc291767","observation_id":"a0f53af4-f1b6-4ba5-a459-a63d6edeb5c4","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:36.982798Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:36.986987Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":1993},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":2,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:36.986987Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:d1baf69422d570ead182ce0dcad5c37638c2a2138a62a331fa9b80e55fbb6972","observation_id":"e63dda42-107c-4417-8aaf-4c51909323e2","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:36.986987Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:36.990991Z","title":"Higher Education: A Critical Business","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":1997},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":3,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:36.990991Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:1c57463805fab92e42537e523284bbfef438ab17c3f48bb19da77d0c31f6d741","observation_id":"788e7ffb-edcb-432c-8ddb-3e7e030fc47e","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:36.990991Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:36.995120Z","title":"Tracking retractions as a window into the scientific process","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":4,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:36.995120Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:4be678a4ca8c5a453b4abb3b2425b6b6a319cdf617b0efd6efcc4a0d262b5a6e","observation_id":"65517739-168d-4559-90e1-10fa447e095c","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:36.995120Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:36.998625Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2001},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":5,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:36.998625Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:edcaeff1ffd96d7ee87048e566d8dc336542f6492476da8eb3823134a866ac06","observation_id":"ebe34f4c-9c39-4031-a628-141558973449","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:36.998625Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.002708Z","title":"Responsible data governance in research infrastructures","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":6,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.002708Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:13c764d5d009e4a84d8f48e2dff218dd54016a1645a48485b78db03088ac5e99","observation_id":"8a77875a-9bb7-48a0-81cc-4fe4e49d4561","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.002708Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.006742Z","title":"Drug development: Raise standards for preclinical cancer research","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2012},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":7,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.006742Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:095a321ff16a5f3cc3bc472ddad32c2a9201afaa18832ed67de567aaba266bfd","observation_id":"14edfbe9-bf9c-4cb5-800c-456567811f98","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.006742Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1903.10676","last_updated":"2019-09-10T18:10:35Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T19:24:00.342521Z","submitted_at":"2019-03-26T05:11:46Z","title":"SciBERT: A Pretrained Language Model for Scientific Text","version":3},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"1903.10676","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.010057Z","title":"Scibert: A pretrained language model for scientific text","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":1903},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":8,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.010057Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/1903.10676","citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:bd11d22b56daac3f50307487224bab97322ec9c694476a356b631edfe279df9b","observation_id":"f3c921be-2e92-4c52-a3af-98748209927d","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.010057Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.013888Z","title":"Rethinking academic peer review as a networked, recursive process","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":9,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.013888Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:bd3a31291a86554bf644e64037fbba50abcd6b8af1d7f2518612688b1d552ac8","observation_id":"7aaf110f-5d49-4ae2-93ea-462fa4dda07c","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.013888Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.017190Z","title":"Bernstein, Andr \\'e s Monroy-Hern \\'a ndez, Drew Harry, Paul Andr \\'e , Katrina Panovich, and Elizabeth F","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2011},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":10,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.017190Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:16a86319df73c60df76bdcd5ea72baea0d403295dd804d69e2341f7f8295ffe8","observation_id":"e3d26563-0d8e-4f52-8f9c-179621babe12","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.017190Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.020985Z","title":"Safeguarding reviewer anonymity in academic publishing","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2019},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":11,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.020985Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:672c4e38ef181170fe5af2e8bdb3845ae1117371ec99913fe61a668e4acc498a","observation_id":"9f2c7cd9-dac6-46d7-a7d2-d639fc009dd1","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.020985Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.024395Z","title":"Scientific peer review","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2011},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":12,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.024395Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f67a8b58024de733240db955fb4a3d52af2f2b5afee58622f7f1f08c0aa85680","observation_id":"d57c39b5-148a-440a-bbce-0fff19798315","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.024395Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":"10.1108/ajim-09-2013-0094","metadata_source":"openalex","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T05:30:23.456663Z","title":"Usefulness of altmetrics for measuring the broader impact of research: A case study using data from plos and f1000prime","venue":"Aslib Journal of Information Management","work_id":"ec747211-035c-48f8-8d84-3d0123ac1b04","year":2014},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":13,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.027690Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:4d602a4e052b454f8977a3d083976e9bc1ad8c9ecf6b1cd6c7c373bf91e9ba68","observation_id":"e5b1e7b4-b0c4-4d7f-bcf3-7c6b04f7580c","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.598251Z","resolver_source":"doi","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.031247Z","title":"What do citation counts measure? a review of studies on citing behavior","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2008},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":14,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.031247Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:8d5fb7a393e7cc478ecadfb58d01e3baaf3374db327d40bdd683db36a7b6ed4f","observation_id":"b942df2e-7996-4d98-96da-cc05e74707bb","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.031247Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.034769Z","title":"Science as an open enterprise","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2012},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":15,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.034769Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:93ccadb78e508091a6297ec7f77d93a19dc6af7598401263ffb7a951dcd50484","observation_id":"978887f5-9342-4c33-a3a8-a98c2c5d870f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.034769Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.037967Z","title":"The Logic of Practice","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":1990},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":16,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.037967Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e9accf0beac1738f3aefa8e36de69787240b56660d131fa91732d0772be909a2","observation_id":"80168440-ee53-4d57-a12a-81673b6363b4","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.037967Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":"10.1007/s11192-005-0255-6","metadata_source":"openalex","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T05:30:23.456663Z","title":"Boyack, Richard Klavans, and Katy Börner","venue":"Scientometrics","work_id":"bf097d16-d514-4ac9-80e5-f8c710d5b780","year":2005},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":17,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.041314Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c0bc4b9c0ed1b77c79e12779bb094109653a68ec3649c5295503147ee545144a","observation_id":"256a9241-3dd5-4052-a07b-34092b962ad4","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.589328Z","resolver_source":"doi","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.044788Z","title":"Is the staggeringly profitable business of scientific publishing bad for science? The Guardian, 2017","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2017},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":18,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.044788Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:8d9ccda01643a17424f56e114e8e5b233b338541abe1a7d5ffbb5944ecac54cc","observation_id":"6c07e5c1-2c99-44fe-97ee-5d6a98e64b31","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.044788Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.049107Z","title":"Cross-field citation embeddings: Towards dynamic interdisciplinarity in scientific discovery","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":19,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.049107Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:162f8eed7122a2b255e93ecdbde3ac67cad2a6271c8cc59010a061b0cb9fb8e7","observation_id":"a20ee270-9fef-4720-8988-c8d9e5660c19","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.049107Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.052389Z","title":"Nature's Capacities and Their Measurement","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2007},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":20,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.052389Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:1afc2d4c59d8e056c4cd1adfdc408783ce1a841ceaf932ebf0e1f2bd9a70b99d","observation_id":"eb1a0962-b66a-45ee-8270-27614f5dc401","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.052389Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.055720Z","title":"Anyone can become a troll: Causes of trolling behavior in online discussions","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2017},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":21,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.055720Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:fe21de37c8f60db78a90c091691615a849c8118503a62f40cb0068cb2022976b","observation_id":"ac14ca30-f2b0-418b-94d0-5c611e704415","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.055720Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.058985Z","title":"Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2015},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":22,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.058985Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:63ad2adbe35cbf07f2113ebe9112db4d29578d88506d7d2c43cbe541075b82ca","observation_id":"e07576b3-8ffa-435c-b28b-0007d6761314","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.058985Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.061874Z","title":"Invisible labour in academia: Gender, race, and recognition in peer review","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":23,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.061874Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:529092bea43e6a1bcf6256dead9e8f7704d5c9e75672ed6f3cb712095fc8674d","observation_id":"b12d1ca6-8141-42f3-ac4a-678cf31a7100","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.061874Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.065014Z","title":"The Citation Process: The Role and Significance of Citations in Scientific Communication","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":1984},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":24,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.065014Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f10bb629e347f4ed266a4e8f53601849fd85878936c75b9462065a7fe21ce3e7","observation_id":"68ed341c-9988-4629-8d67-6884844e8883","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.065014Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.068239Z","title":"Blockchain technology: What is it good for? Information Systems Journal, 28 0 (4): 0 639--653, 2018","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":25,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.068239Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:d1ebd8954dff9de378359b7726e9b5fd7f9b26d2839fadbcdf9a7f2fbd1880ac","observation_id":"9a46c482-7f35-420c-92d3-733db1ecfa22","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.068239Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.071495Z","title":"de Solla Price","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":1965},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":26,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.071495Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:6cfe38154d3b48af1e48b1462456a646425eec10e075257c4273f9bf26b0f322","observation_id":"75f5578d-6ed9-4f54-a885-a01c20d80ea7","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.071495Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.074969Z","title":"Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias—an updated review","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2013},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":27,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.074969Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:19a0be4647cc227398d1f69a92e9437db880105ceb4dfe15e55268cc84f2fb65","observation_id":"7b741e3e-274d-405c-8342-09f7a24863b0","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.074969Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.078079Z","title":"Open data, open science, and the replicability of economic research","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2016},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":28,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.078079Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:703cf65ff139cccfcf9a1aba1f5f6d4c5bc9deb22c48382af544f1f1fe1ce741","observation_id":"a6826a0a-9cc1-46c2-9a8f-252073968a7b","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.078079Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.081373Z","title":"Esposito","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2017},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":29,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.081373Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:9f1f42671bf3d8a0efa505621a9121357f45248670899a128ee724c9ef1b90f5","observation_id":"d62c49fc-b6e2-4bfc-a9f2-728bbe0f6da9","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.081373Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.084680Z","title":"Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2012},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":30,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.084680Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:7ca9a3a34baaad66a6ffd4042c190a897bc3a7999e7b0c16eab233a946572e0d","observation_id":"014dd48e-fdf9-49a2-ac2a-bddb6fcce8bb","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.084680Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":"10.1371/journal.pbio.2004089","metadata_source":"openalex","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T05:30:23.456663Z","title":null,"venue":"PLoS Biology","work_id":"d95985aa-85b9-4b0e-8924-4850b496f03c","year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":31,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.087903Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:dacefeb4d20889027eda51458537082ae3472397ff367e4a10d21d601b69ae74","observation_id":"9a711021-db4b-484b-b5ff-e6f2a1ca66cc","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.580593Z","resolver_source":"doi","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.091153Z","title":"Against Method: Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":1975},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":32,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.091153Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e3336bf82586dfa590d30a53b17a84fb58b8874ee02feeabf5aa1eb37d17a7a6","observation_id":"46655005-6f0f-4248-9e64-76f8c9a6d6c0","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.091153Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.094374Z","title":"Generous Thinking: A Radical Approach to Saving the University","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2019},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":33,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.094374Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:fe799ff87e5c2c6c8cbc7e5315d19031e2941f433c95c9b170546e24aec4d9fe","observation_id":"a21fb5ef-c81b-43e9-91cd-39017aa0b228","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.094374Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.097486Z","title":"Bergstrom, Katy Börner, James A","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":34,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.097486Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b59b73ffbb659085315a906f0edf5ed8f7339f751c4d0840db2017aaf2816fef","observation_id":"cb735604-f70c-4b3d-9be2-5b0b93df2dc3","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.097486Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.101794Z","title":"Pedagogy of the Oppressed","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":1970},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":35,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.101794Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:7db05c6257c4c450917df518bd58b58ce4870fa0706ebac6c3dbdbbebd854736","observation_id":"ac45d4a9-8ed4-4a17-8cfe-cf0d67f736b1","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.101794Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.104999Z","title":"Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2007},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":36,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.104999Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:9dc23fd3af82df046e98c8be5bf1aa038655f35299a334836ebb945e12b87f3c","observation_id":"44bc6aac-fc5d-49aa-9513-744cfd4c591d","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.104999Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.108361Z","title":"Truth and Method","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2004},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":37,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.108361Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:44dc5468f89abe97352051e32a8222570d6bab4d4c205b8473aab6216e37c673","observation_id":"23157f58-6404-4c6e-85d9-bd4ab8c93971","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.108361Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.111814Z","title":"Science and innovation: Rethinking the incentives","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2017},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":38,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.111814Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:04c399caa3c2af471518c7a8ef7bd13f35e5fc86537fac5d9e743b4e5c6b5daa","observation_id":"9e5bedd2-f178-4d4c-b4f7-04e2d1d46393","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.111814Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:38.355636Z","title":"The history and meaning of the journal impact factor","venue":null,"work_id":"76ea8107-9d18-4a80-858b-f259bc11418f","year":2006},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":39,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.115042Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a5d638ec2f569369b0d4200361076fdbb49495741bb04caef2290d6fd330b6ef","observation_id":"e7cf45e9-54bd-4870-be5b-643e901ef46b","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:38.360028Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:38.345617Z","title":"Semantic publishing: the coming revolution in scientific communication? Data Intelligence, 2 0 (1-2): 0 79--89, 2020","venue":null,"work_id":"8c2a6e13-1135-4792-bac1-503ca8752650","year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":40,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.118335Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:2d95263ab1f0b4369d260e0ffdc40609a78f7c35fe457f71240e59b4912027ef","observation_id":"d297e38c-09d5-4c00-987c-cefd4a3c68b6","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:38.349472Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:38.335249Z","title":"Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research","venue":null,"work_id":"a76d45db-14a5-4d1c-802b-c56f9a0db133","year":2014},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":41,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.121662Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:09fdd9d0d6b2223fe845eacd00da5fcdbec9dd67d1d37d8fcb4c2594245a1531","observation_id":"ad16bafb-a153-4a09-a65e-788c4804e6e8","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:38.338848Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"4383.65655","doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.729751Z","title":"Towards a model for diachronous and synchronous citation analyses","venue":null,"work_id":"22056d5a-81a0-476c-ba36-a6d35d0251df","year":2004},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":42,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.124986Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:49c5189e5da4c9fb7819ebaa3e958a9943995175face525db910ed7df8db708f","observation_id":"e78c6161-aa07-446d-9715-3d8e65a00936","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.734481Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:38.325332Z","title":"Making reviewers visible: openness, accountability, and credit","venue":null,"work_id":"a965784f-baa5-49ef-b5ab-3bd54230e44e","year":2002},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":43,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.128627Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:2f273e4e78e8790e5f41177eb8e7d38fda8e7694cf9f1bc9e6cbecd5d482a773","observation_id":"0386c72b-8dd9-4263-a378-2378e2cfa1e6","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:38.328681Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:38.314809Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"f067ed7d-898d-41a0-915f-9373bea9ce56","year":1999},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":44,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.131906Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:8180e144efb3c2183ffcdc9507e3d8e54f9d227fa9fbc7925e86007da87f5242","observation_id":"5f698e4d-119e-4591-9ec0-99dd29e2f803","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:38.318481Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:38.303775Z","title":"Knowledge as a public good: The role of universities in the era of open science","venue":null,"work_id":"83d5990d-c4ca-4051-8b15-b1797e849c05","year":2014},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":45,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.135150Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a462a8e20c0160946ab7cef951071789610e0b0ff7f99e63e6f71bc24fa21814","observation_id":"9ead219f-5ae3-4ad4-b32c-10754ae20959","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:38.307746Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:38.294195Z","title":"The strength of weak ties","venue":null,"work_id":"d8ba9b56-a8e1-40f4-9953-cc2479dcf300","year":1973},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":46,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.138302Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:da8e2c3f90e848b153decea7795618c74faad8a7203fb716535a8fdf02b11833","observation_id":"95bdaae7-b5e4-4a34-b749-bbf7f6a4d62c","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:38.297544Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":"10.1007/s10654-016-0149-3","metadata_source":"openalex","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:03:40.895421Z","title":"Senn, Kenneth J","venue":"European Journal of Epidemiology","work_id":"71980e78-7f4c-4bec-ab65-bed42221dd52","year":2016},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":47,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.141696Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:4ee50072cbb54e093e7838f9596722f95c56159edc09bef3547fe23d1316e7a0","observation_id":"ffa3261e-6897-4232-a3c7-118670c89986","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.570956Z","resolver_source":"doi","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:38.283524Z","title":"Ownership and ethics in digital peer review environments","venue":null,"work_id":"e0850bea-d951-43d5-ad76-f816cbac86ca","year":2017},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":48,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.145406Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a7976b65a9cebae05b53e5888b429ff49a0f6b69a1395871d576101db7bcfc1f","observation_id":"ae3465dc-62d9-43fc-a70e-fdfbe97646da","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:38.287111Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:38.273322Z","title":"Defending science—within reason: Between scientism and cynicism","venue":null,"work_id":"a2010324-9c16-42cd-a8fc-2b8047a2f979","year":2003},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":49,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.148576Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:2a9bb5e5a8e58b65821a200b5e6c8f1dcafeaeda93089ba7ce4ff9f195c2fdf9","observation_id":"ab165b51-0af1-4785-9620-374cf1f56125","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:38.277115Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:38.263032Z","title":"The Theory of Communicative Action","venue":null,"work_id":"25d35548-8ade-4de2-97d5-290e02a6ee34","year":1984},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":50,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.151895Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:be912bad8f64a73e3c92c6fa61623db684a3195085b01584477901793d0729f8","observation_id":"61b67ff2-bfb0-4152-83e9-66ba5d11bc27","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:38.267168Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.156522Z","title":"The Social Construction of What? Harvard University Press, 1999","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":1999},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":51,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.156522Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:0f52c3b4d5c8f31b67867386a40dc3d3ed911b02db392816f69992ae92eb8ebb","observation_id":"efa1f94d-7280-461e-b6be-27f333a90ef6","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.156522Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:38.247508Z","title":"Epistemic Dependence: Dependence in the Diffusion of Knowledge","venue":null,"work_id":"7ea0bd10-b5e2-4cc7-8da3-463641baeca6","year":1993},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":52,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.160395Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:84b543458fb4957778e0c3ab139d27673b0aff5053032a559ec45bb79cd22b8f","observation_id":"4bdf4b09-621e-4a31-a1a6-b7e762723e91","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:38.250910Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:38.237662Z","title":"Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking from Women's Lives","venue":null,"work_id":"3530b028-07eb-4218-a547-23f344770eff","year":1991},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":53,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.163568Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:08002589a2ff72c2c580a55ec45f79e7ee3de665076b1d301cb56547bb37e1ac","observation_id":"47df186b-3672-4bc7-ad14-f512a0e986a1","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:38.241125Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":"10.1038/s41562-020-0912-7","metadata_source":"doi_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.557608Z","title":"Hardwicke and John P","venue":null,"work_id":"919d64ff-ef8e-4d14-ac52-b76964988c59","year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":54,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.166874Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:58eedd4ffd49a8e2fb27f5163abf66a7b74026101fc9fdbce53b767937460502","observation_id":"1cd624a7-b0c2-43d5-b252-1dace385f619","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.561016Z","resolver_source":"doi","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:38.227561Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"ee31ad19-d454-4a31-a370-3daca3b9f9cf","year":1997},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":55,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.170294Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:48efdcfef54552dde1b7910d137bdda49bbd6b9e494f37e3969df2a9508fba9c","observation_id":"32145763-1f40-494d-8883-f7de833b5947","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:38.230712Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:38.216045Z","title":"Authorship attribution and stylometry: Applications and challenges in digital forensics and computational humanities","venue":null,"work_id":"f02a0226-d9d4-4263-afaa-8d727ab7cc17","year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":56,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.173460Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e3fa4b237f51401a83fff5f8dcfede244d04a78b1d52247bd6cd468f1d10a98b","observation_id":"7e6e130d-7571-47d1-b3c6-d1fc44f2b37b","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:38.220093Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:38.204799Z","title":"Teaching to Transgress: Education as the Practice of Freedom","venue":null,"work_id":"6b710e41-e0c8-4255-91c5-d4a4c3e841fe","year":1994},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":57,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.177264Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:1b10882143e320d3867243bf4b18b5688a5a6257d82301935406c35741014e62","observation_id":"17a7c4e4-83db-4f74-8f07-e88b2e68cf4c","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:38.209197Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:38.193929Z","title":"Machine learning for detecting p-hacking: The case of clinical trials","venue":null,"work_id":"374396b6-559c-41e9-821a-febee939a351","year":2019},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":58,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.180554Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:9db600e938576faa1d16edb7be7a7adac7b9ead9ea42bd6c81d04b966b4a7bd2","observation_id":"1c5dfabf-4918-4aed-a061-41f0e5bd0577","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:38.198352Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:38.183328Z","title":"Why most published research findings are false","venue":null,"work_id":"a95ec1f9-f096-4c76-951f-6ccb53f18e08","year":2005},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":59,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.185002Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:4951bf30a2a8f32c3ae46f2ee1de631c28a01eceef30d4a443ac1c587029dfca","observation_id":"e804e5c3-6fae-43f5-a0c8-686119542845","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:38.186895Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:38.172210Z","title":"Open research knowledge graph: Next generation infrastructure for semantic scholarly knowledge","venue":null,"work_id":"46d5f2fa-d72b-49cd-8d06-9169deebf064","year":2019},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":60,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.188191Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:9ac466f258ace0d63b882aab8e62e4f24dcd850317ecdb0e62448a9e22fa83f4","observation_id":"1024151b-49c5-4988-a798-72f74e5ffb83","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:38.175771Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:38.162302Z","title":"Measuring the evolution of a scientific field through citation frames","venue":null,"work_id":"25aa9325-c326-43b6-b3b6-edeaf30688ae","year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":61,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.191733Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:bfd80b7abf75596d54cf64515bfe9c3361be95f0ea89f035c464fc4d161bd6a6","observation_id":"59423131-60ba-45de-badc-178079953370","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:38.166258Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:38.151775Z","title":"Learning analytics and the academic: Critical perspectives on data-driven education","venue":null,"work_id":"73af2ad0-4169-4561-8714-3e21087be223","year":2014},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":62,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.195234Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:dcd58ded1bab51299a98e674a7af26cd873f71b32ca17ff424fa265d83e2f154","observation_id":"5784f582-e2ab-4b50-8a25-b92033844362","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:38.155881Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:38.142238Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"c5cab0e7-389b-40bb-ba5b-e476377a66f4","year":1962},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":63,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.198456Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:550ddb28cb9393c7266cafb0aaab3b4280ac8722abc45e709fef7f61c1fa288c","observation_id":"f5a88929-ce5d-4058-ac28-92384e74eabb","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:38.145522Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:38.132201Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"2d76f19e-47d8-4c9c-bef4-645251d87671","year":1970},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":64,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.201793Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:182295a107d974f37186bb47c87a10236f4b41ae94f13fb44e1cdf40877c8f5c","observation_id":"e6fc8594-da23-40ea-9357-657a9e7d37d9","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:38.135281Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:38.121958Z","title":"The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes","venue":null,"work_id":"331dbd77-89bf-4709-86b7-9c84b9e0d1eb","year":1978},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":65,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.205062Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:df536a8915fbf9e3d185ff6c6007b542247387105210bd71c78c33084f78cb44","observation_id":"6a4c4361-5190-48da-8be6-4d037d45a85a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:38.125386Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:38.112630Z","title":"The oligopoly of academic publishers in the digital era","venue":null,"work_id":"b43f559c-ebfe-4fa1-96c4-f120e1da3b2c","year":2015},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":66,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.208411Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e2c550f5d12d1d6efcd586f54227606fbd86158f704386d05652a6bb226ca1e3","observation_id":"ec42b52d-ef49-4c31-97de-6c2bcd4e7b95","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:38.115946Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:38.102849Z","title":"Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society","venue":null,"work_id":"64df33bb-f6f9-4fd2-ab18-198f350748e1","year":1987},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":67,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.211873Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:862d8c4856ca10a6e96fa967d1994d4251d74698d2a51b032bca094eb5b879bd","observation_id":"947a6ef0-2cd7-4726-a7d8-7abe863bd1b4","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:38.106098Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:38.093520Z","title":"Indicators of the interdisciplinarity of journals: Diversity, centrality, and citations","venue":null,"work_id":"cf5fdec1-a9a4-442d-b95b-c3d6b7af2766","year":2011},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":68,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.215451Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:339522debe198dde0f051cbd794162905e457bad1974d0ae82d6e3dc7757601f","observation_id":"ff3f6846-b667-4a3f-932c-00a88b3e9e06","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:38.096893Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:38.084609Z","title":"Knowledge graphs in scientific literature: Construction, applications and challenges","venue":null,"work_id":"dcf09354-1f60-48cf-8ec0-2f332a72f38e","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":69,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.218766Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c164f093eac8096f3f6e76a0746a4f0beb89778038d6c884cd4080257ddae90d","observation_id":"00933397-4e1b-4c8a-9f71-6a9cc405e5a5","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:38.087820Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:38.075094Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"3498afcd-40a1-439d-b4b9-fe46eb432696","year":1990},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":70,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.222075Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f0cb6249e7d0685901db95795d9fbd408a9850f4a010baec21fb188e6984293b","observation_id":"02aeba6c-7600-4493-880f-d8af3bf407e7","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:38.078650Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:38.066274Z","title":"A genealogy of citation metrics","venue":null,"work_id":"2f1f7c00-2221-49de-8151-56ad7c3da650","year":2013},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":71,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.226241Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:576968a69ae7c7b1fae9860dc2e9585cc0e97b1d3c874555dd771f4081cdc1a5","observation_id":"708abaa9-2f00-4f07-8ce3-939e0d4f0375","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:38.069297Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:38.057464Z","title":"Speed, quality, and peer review in the covid-19 pandemic","venue":null,"work_id":"8ed6e231-1506-4fa3-a4d4-0d07032feced","year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":72,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.229705Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:5c2fcb1dc1e91af716f31cf8fec60c4c69f67318ddf03d8f44216cf4d01f20f2","observation_id":"98bc5360-ab83-4012-b189-5edce9f5647b","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:38.060462Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:38.048851Z","title":"The matthew effect in science","venue":null,"work_id":"6f0d3f04-4541-4b88-af38-2e705580d502","year":1968},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":73,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.232914Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:bde41d47a97101e61ef7d240df336d9534191dd1e0019dec7f9c76859dd8f408","observation_id":"03111125-5045-4d73-86af-5166a996e13b","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:38.052041Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:38.040169Z","title":"Coauthorship and the reward system of science: A principal–agent model","venue":null,"work_id":"c11a6dff-bdb2-4569-8d56-34523b2ecb2c","year":2016},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":74,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.236185Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:343d52982aced38e681027640a599a03c2c43454216e5e6c00a49c2af35349c3","observation_id":"56ab230c-9884-4f78-aecf-f5f50ed910ff","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:38.043268Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":"10.1177/030631277500500105","metadata_source":"openalex","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T05:30:23.456663Z","title":"Moravcsik and Poovanalingam Murugesan","venue":"Social Studies of Science","work_id":"0c2e04ee-e4f9-405d-bbbb-06ea07bfe76e","year":1975},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":75,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.239946Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:da757383a8687547bbc0657860c24cf90f51695214878d0315f4f336deaa8f16","observation_id":"7b8ee134-ff95-46f5-89fe-cae13e34ccbb","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.551651Z","resolver_source":"doi","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:38.031038Z","title":"Citation is a political practice","venue":null,"work_id":"c7826f3d-5eda-4d1c-b2dd-1e555fc4d189","year":2019},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":76,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.243189Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:cffa007322f1857bc8fc34f7e97e87a7834c1b347743481a3b685f906154f5e2","observation_id":"5cc5f72c-9376-448d-9e77-0dad404dec06","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:38.034151Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:38.021982Z","title":"Peer review in a changing world: An international study measuring the attitudes of researchers","venue":null,"work_id":"1c08a865-74f4-4df4-8ffe-55926c29ba0a","year":2013},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":77,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.246528Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e612151812cd4f0b3d66f416084322e2da14fc244baa7e4b6dfce4f097f3ae44","observation_id":"f0e3046e-d730-4e1f-8437-e4076f606ed1","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:38.025210Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:38.013062Z","title":"A manifesto for reproducible science","venue":null,"work_id":"f39ddf70-9d8d-4deb-af76-0beab89c23ee","year":2017},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":78,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.250193Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:4b82e9586baccb063166ca30f0b5b9c37dc2be05ca805f3abc707fcdf3cd7b33","observation_id":"6e06a30f-0825-4709-b8f5-7f527d5e7257","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:38.015872Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:38.004905Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"b8299693-bcaa-4738-8c82-9ecc3468a032","year":2019},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":79,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.253490Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e24ea5c6d1aaeec5fb55b9c3a51283fa06857186fdca0562082e9de93b606888","observation_id":"bb64bde4-316f-47ab-a558-45e6b1da37fa","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:38.007605Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.996866Z","title":"Networks: An Introduction","venue":null,"work_id":"2de11744-ff4c-49df-9f19-1eba966b176f","year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":80,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.256672Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:0628d9ba728b7c756a7f302ed9e4683089f3673d379e1c98f4b414d05dd2c13d","observation_id":"0a2c0aa3-4e12-494a-a4be-7c9dd8643b9d","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.999489Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.988276Z","title":"Promoting an open research culture","venue":null,"work_id":"117a84b7-0ce2-4df3-8434-4918e75205ff","year":2015},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":81,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.260140Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:37a661a3970b0d3c2cb34f71e91a7241c68ee52e89680e69cf8db3b48cdf88ac","observation_id":"f6ab151e-7d8f-404d-aa82-2029dc2498e4","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.991189Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.979686Z","title":"Epistemic injustice and the politics of citation","venue":null,"work_id":"8e8f4f18-2335-4166-89fa-1333749b71b8","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":82,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.263054Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:4eca4ebc24c19a719316f94ddc8f0a45776cf416a66eb3ad13269a2cc33a9ba9","observation_id":"e759b7f4-1186-4b53-93a6-eddbea7e09c1","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.982709Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.971320Z","title":"The length of the peer review process as a function of reviewer behavior and journal policies","venue":null,"work_id":"6d2c09dd-3074-4cf0-97e9-766539a9ff91","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":83,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.266537Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:2f3e79d3ad6d63cacf9d20b2638c0c2a3df70fdb75648b7a177557a57f43e372","observation_id":"71efbd1b-ba78-42f7-bc8f-d856f9a2fda4","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.974255Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":"10.5678/eeq.v12i3.2014","metadata_source":"doi_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.539314Z","title":"Evaluating educational programs: The role of context","venue":null,"work_id":"a1306472-81e6-4ea6-a4be-0f81a3ef0805","year":2014},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":84,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.269671Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:330ecd10a5771be111412c2536c59f063d3dd71f09550b8736ef94995291c6b2","observation_id":"9a4d2772-252f-420d-82be-6d474d2715ac","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.542388Z","resolver_source":"doi","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.272970Z","title":"The Logic of Scientific Discovery","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2005},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":85,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.272970Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f545612931a5f075adb9f112778f45b786ecff55ffb749a5d8d4ccb4bf4f5d72","observation_id":"58e3ecef-113c-45e4-b3f8-36d8b41521f5","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.272970Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.963318Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"4c56ebf8-b51a-4251-be97-d017038e709f","year":2002},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":86,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.276073Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:2f03fc4074f1d365911dc2acdd86e1fd53a840b16c0628cdbe581579b2f05856","observation_id":"52823546-e1ed-494a-ad24-215346321a0e","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.965987Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.954717Z","title":"Does it take too long to publish research? Nature, 530 0 (7589): 0 148--151, 2016","venue":null,"work_id":"f27330c2-a0ad-461d-8dbc-f1baa722b3ae","year":2016},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":87,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.279650Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:ec5a965b085d930a90d427859d2c8cd890ae36fb7953285cecc68624741599ea","observation_id":"0d150e9f-5e2c-486f-90e4-84c2a9d0df7c","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.957730Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.946426Z","title":"How journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinary research: A comparison between innovation studies and business & management","venue":null,"work_id":"61ab57fc-efed-4071-8eab-5ff20637ddeb","year":2012},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":88,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.282670Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:43496c3823a953d7623ef98ac92dfc6a52612661417f0ba83c72a246db99c8ed","observation_id":"674633f5-5f77-41cc-ab71-1f3208ec1c49","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.949366Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.938392Z","title":"The ethics of science communication","venue":null,"work_id":"a4307b1c-5d89-4451-a77a-ffc47e0c504b","year":2010},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":89,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.285821Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:cba2276f83530bef738ca2b6e2e0715fe35678654fbb46953e7b982cb485eaf6","observation_id":"18099503-b7ce-4e19-86b2-5d0be58ad1aa","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.941206Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.929916Z","title":"Blockchain for education: Lifelong learning passport and self-sovereign identity","venue":null,"work_id":"ca256570-e482-4778-9fe2-ff0691a86169","year":2019},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":90,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.289610Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:9a43d07e46f8dce77544e50741a23bf254c4b80a1b4eb20cc7c195db84388800","observation_id":"b384ff51-e77b-4bfc-b361-24827537cc50","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.932941Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.921460Z","title":"Peer review in the post-modern world: The changing role of the referee","venue":null,"work_id":"60782255-cfd8-404a-98ab-842c3cb9f679","year":1998},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":91,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.292927Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:79e1a9530ad827af133a0505c9e2f4928357c160d1698661542538383c9e30ea","observation_id":"c16f5cae-2cd4-4997-8c9a-4fff572b82a5","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.924361Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.912686Z","title":"Quantifying the quality of peer reviewers through review scoring","venue":null,"work_id":"24074eec-e89b-446d-bf05-592b11b837d9","year":2014},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":92,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.296086Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:28b99586426a06a2ed8bfe4d5986547ce784b5411284b4b3fa49d1a0abf181f7","observation_id":"88706e57-4d8f-4dfa-97d6-288b5a2a9eaa","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.915834Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.904458Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"cbe91790-da6d-4c4c-899d-142b7642dbf8","year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":93,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.299351Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:0603fb6e81ee44e5f1090b3ed6995d247fc8d03f678b7c18692e3185445d1b6c","observation_id":"182b2b67-95e4-4d7d-85bf-eb6b2c28fbcd","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.907162Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.896076Z","title":"Out with the old: New preprint servers for chemistry","venue":null,"work_id":"cc427714-5b3a-4227-829a-ce829b43c4a7","year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":94,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.302776Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b1e530844cb9798029f2231b3c51eca492962bf12d0f468ff8986ab44ea146c8","observation_id":"5144f388-1daa-4c5b-88a0-72e0ef85a2b8","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.898852Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.886750Z","title":"Anonymous but accountable: Cryptographic pseudonymity in peer review systems","venue":null,"work_id":"27982ee8-4b1b-4fc3-a4e8-2874c805c000","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":95,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.306065Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:658aa05d413dcddc70dc64c3275fe94264b360b0727900a2c8b2b89b55d98e11","observation_id":"e3d6dda5-cb70-4e29-b414-49ec1cbfeafc","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.889792Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.877644Z","title":"Enabling fair research through identity and metadata management","venue":null,"work_id":"f187e1aa-b17b-421e-b259-65ce1c10db6b","year":2019},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":96,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.309495Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:274442c29c781deab64c01c04302e7e37a493dacb40b956674e59c9bea5eb324","observation_id":"cad93e1a-593f-495e-be2d-ebf39e5fe043","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.880550Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":"10.1002/asi.4630240406","metadata_source":"openalex","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T05:30:23.456663Z","title":"Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents","venue":"Journal of the American Society for Information Science","work_id":"a0e772ba-79df-49e1-9199-937274dbb134","year":1973},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":97,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.312614Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:788c17fe96d653666dc0c4eb13ef66f8167094723cd08cdc02e6bb95e38e8d56","observation_id":"049a6517-5456-48ae-890b-8d068260055b","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.533389Z","resolver_source":"doi","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.869317Z","title":"Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals","venue":null,"work_id":"3c81f1ca-a915-4bad-9785-e54937d87dd3","year":2006},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":98,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.315963Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b23e0652068acf9900e5fd2e0a8f1eee8a2727ab23a18b973d0113af1e96e80a","observation_id":"981d8b2b-4bb4-498c-9795-5ce3c0707f90","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.872209Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.860461Z","title":"Blockchain-based framework for scholarly peer review and journal publishing","venue":null,"work_id":"1d7ef861-c0f4-4a6b-8466-81bb257790a8","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":99,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.319288Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:d416becb3d8cba425e918a590f53ee0c8ccd06671a63de7626d7470395ca960b","observation_id":"004842a6-5d78-4241-8577-0cc96a15f398","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.863316Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.852058Z","title":"Teixeira da Silva and Lutz Bornmann","venue":null,"work_id":"c561110b-0075-42ac-a4a3-08536ae56a39","year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","version":1},"reference_index":100,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.322386Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.22497"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b56b5c070e3c75d73005c7a354238227b36c35898e546de6157ddf28c0ba59a6","observation_id":"6bbebf67-5a85-45e8-8516-296f76ce03ce","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:37.854916Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}}],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.22497","last_updated":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","latest_version":1,"primary_category":"cs.CY","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:58:01.218346Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":100,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":45,"verified_exact":9,"verified_fuzzy":46},"total_outbound_references":114},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:31:53.387327+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 13 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 100 of 114 outbound references and 0 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2506.22497."}