{"as_of":"2026-08-09T21:33:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:42c707a7ced3213c04c8afbb765b5b156f933afae5a49ab252acec2a0d05e966","coverage":[{"denominator":59,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":59,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:58.981803Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":60,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":60,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":1,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-04T23:24:02.006607Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"pith","source_observed_at":"2026-08-04T23:24:02.241941Z","state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.06661","last_updated":"2025-08-09T11:29:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:59:26.170800Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-09T08:46:32Z","title":"Peer influence breaks ergodicity in an opinion dynamics model with external information","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2507.06661","doi":null,"metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"2507.06661","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-04T23:24:02.241941Z","title":"Peer influence breaks ergodicity in an opinion dynamics model with external information","venue":"physics.soc-ph","work_id":"289e3f6c-8ece-4d30-999d-2fcfedd362b7","year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2509.06649","last_updated":"2025-09-08T13:03:59Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T21:09:01.667339Z","submitted_at":"2025-09-08T13:03:59Z","title":"Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking, Group Decision Making and Beyond 2. Distorted Polarization and Vulnerability","version":1},"reference_index":19,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-04T23:24:02.006607Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2507.06661","citing_paper":"/paper/2509.06649"},"observation_digest":"sha256:493703c238919d49f1af5c5daea78b148ee7cbcee7d090b5bfc5b5aac0df947c","observation_id":"0b1d18a0-cc05-4faa-9850-183087427196","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-04T23:24:02.245206Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}}],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2507.06661/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2507.06661/integrity","json":"/paper/2507.06661/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2507.06661"},"outbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.484653Z","title":"Fifty years of sociology","venue":null,"work_id":"29f48779-4ff4-4c1d-a223-8eb2e91faa5e","year":1986},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.06661","last_updated":"2025-08-09T11:29:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:59:26.170800Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-09T08:46:32Z","title":"Peer influence breaks ergodicity in an opinion dynamics model with external information","version":2},"reference_index":1,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:58.788736Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.06661"},"observation_digest":"sha256:d5158127e44604d6cff54ccd501a4f865ad9f459b1fd5582ffd710969bfcbcea","observation_id":"8b0dfd25-8f23-4b14-84f9-7fa738ea55a0","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.487888Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.476361Z","title":"Opinion polarization by learning from social feedback","venue":null,"work_id":"74f69656-3eb4-4486-8d12-3c7d4ff0c8f0","year":2019},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.06661","last_updated":"2025-08-09T11:29:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:59:26.170800Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-09T08:46:32Z","title":"Peer influence breaks ergodicity in an opinion dynamics model with external information","version":2},"reference_index":2,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:58.793089Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.06661"},"observation_digest":"sha256:cbf1c6cea3b10d4a5f89947b730347872c5d7591b9e413f7b0251d55c0b82960","observation_id":"b3ebb4be-0270-438e-8f4c-532431a2e09f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.479581Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.466424Z","title":"A theory of fads, fashion, custom, and cultural change as informational cascades","venue":null,"work_id":"4af1fdfe-e67d-4746-b074-c55a01fc6c9c","year":1992},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.06661","last_updated":"2025-08-09T11:29:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:59:26.170800Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-09T08:46:32Z","title":"Peer influence breaks ergodicity in an opinion dynamics model with external information","version":2},"reference_index":3,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:58.796287Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.06661"},"observation_digest":"sha256:03b24eddd87e91e9bf9c77190240903236838df02dd18779c1d9ae4fde8e92ca","observation_id":"982492bb-f2c3-4b82-8835-86b453e1c10d","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.470865Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.458060Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"9b30f7e8-24f4-4d16-86d1-fa6e83612ed1","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.06661","last_updated":"2025-08-09T11:29:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:59:26.170800Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-09T08:46:32Z","title":"Peer influence breaks ergodicity in an opinion dynamics model with external information","version":2},"reference_index":4,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:58.799520Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.06661"},"observation_digest":"sha256:cb8b163d1f1e5c02f78d2c5de61a9308c18b296f821719fc58e179f63dc5491e","observation_id":"5529661d-e462-457a-86ba-9edce945b8b2","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.461445Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:58.803441Z","title":"Threshold models of collective behavior","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":1978},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.06661","last_updated":"2025-08-09T11:29:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:59:26.170800Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-09T08:46:32Z","title":"Peer influence breaks ergodicity in an opinion dynamics model with external information","version":2},"reference_index":5,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:58.803441Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.06661"},"observation_digest":"sha256:3d46f8d2bd62997d542f30641c73c6b501c93a40b6c47726f4e8f7845a3d2570","observation_id":"62b8f518-a409-4437-bb45-ddbc790a0b33","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:58.803441Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.446567Z","title":"Sociophysics: A review of galam models","venue":null,"work_id":"d32d07bd-29b1-4279-9674-007c1c325ddc","year":2008},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.06661","last_updated":"2025-08-09T11:29:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:59:26.170800Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-09T08:46:32Z","title":"Peer influence breaks ergodicity in an opinion dynamics model with external information","version":2},"reference_index":6,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:58.806781Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.06661"},"observation_digest":"sha256:dde78e510311de24af5bd17e995ca2969f30fd80487acf7f471dfca106e910aa","observation_id":"77b1801f-d1b2-42d7-8a6d-842bbef406bc","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.448991Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.438417Z","title":"Social impact models of opinion dynamics","venue":null,"work_id":"e5518b8b-1a9e-4a0d-8daf-7225652a51e5","year":2001},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.06661","last_updated":"2025-08-09T11:29:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:59:26.170800Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-09T08:46:32Z","title":"Peer influence breaks ergodicity in an opinion dynamics model with external information","version":2},"reference_index":7,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:58.809673Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.06661"},"observation_digest":"sha256:324d0d6783e58a9ea0882a6980f0a0d3e403324875e2a19ad5e1c0eaeccf214d","observation_id":"2a8835fa-9e1a-4830-93d9-1c7b15386b60","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.441847Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.430140Z","title":"Statistical physics of social dynamics","venue":null,"work_id":"71b43bd8-1e95-4db6-a59c-89e6a896086b","year":2009},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.06661","last_updated":"2025-08-09T11:29:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:59:26.170800Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-09T08:46:32Z","title":"Peer influence breaks ergodicity in an opinion dynamics model with external information","version":2},"reference_index":8,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:58.813625Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.06661"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f1f67638edabfd9d223564c81a61fc58acf8ec598a2018327152b5194e71d7d9","observation_id":"bf544be1-d941-4c46-bd4b-3fe06b045bc0","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.433929Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.422599Z","title":"How can statistical mechanics contribute to social science? Pro- ceedings of the national academy of sciences , 96(19):10582–10584, 1999","venue":null,"work_id":"aee306d6-0b60-4244-937c-0e1b42187e3a","year":1999},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.06661","last_updated":"2025-08-09T11:29:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:59:26.170800Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-09T08:46:32Z","title":"Peer influence breaks ergodicity in an opinion dynamics model with external information","version":2},"reference_index":9,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:58.816241Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.06661"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a6e2e160348e5a8ed9c63c3b9e3ed5be17ee154944f743045e9ed2be77dff1ef","observation_id":"9e23ff2c-eccf-4a03-b3db-356963084996","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.425700Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.414201Z","title":"Crises and collective socio-economic phenomena: simple models and challenges","venue":null,"work_id":"ad04f343-758b-4f19-9cd6-65051ce373e3","year":2013},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.06661","last_updated":"2025-08-09T11:29:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:59:26.170800Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-09T08:46:32Z","title":"Peer influence breaks ergodicity in an opinion dynamics model with external information","version":2},"reference_index":10,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:58.819057Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.06661"},"observation_digest":"sha256:2f08cae63db7e71495a7cc60151abd0d08b1c8181fbfc1f177a4e07fbac1b621","observation_id":"0f55f398-48c9-4b8a-be17-fc671122b655","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.417464Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.406681Z","title":"Voter models and external influence","venue":null,"work_id":"263723b8-cc41-49b3-a5da-fccbde92c5a5","year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.06661","last_updated":"2025-08-09T11:29:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:59:26.170800Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-09T08:46:32Z","title":"Peer influence breaks ergodicity in an opinion dynamics model with external information","version":2},"reference_index":11,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:58.822796Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.06661"},"observation_digest":"sha256:4d1b8c00cf0c8e47bc5bb37e9fb05a308efcffe600392fa1b14ca5460db07202","observation_id":"269d3f99-9f0f-4ab3-84ba-6dcebe7345da","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.409846Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.398964Z","title":"Impact of memory on opinion dynamics","venue":null,"work_id":"b81d06f2-9206-4f5b-b8d0-f412cc5dbbb6","year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.06661","last_updated":"2025-08-09T11:29:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:59:26.170800Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-09T08:46:32Z","title":"Peer influence breaks ergodicity in an opinion dynamics model with external information","version":2},"reference_index":12,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:58.826250Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.06661"},"observation_digest":"sha256:79183bdef0258b3a54d7641f89e7643c015a1260e135d0f5cfc0fbb28e490191","observation_id":"5d341c65-ffa3-4262-89ca-189c3e4973cf","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.401641Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.391265Z","title":"The noisy voter model on complex networks","venue":null,"work_id":"26f56e99-e29b-4b06-b135-b61172778ded","year":2016},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.06661","last_updated":"2025-08-09T11:29:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:59:26.170800Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-09T08:46:32Z","title":"Peer influence breaks ergodicity in an opinion dynamics model with external information","version":2},"reference_index":13,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:58.829273Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.06661"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a5fcff4fb6c41f50f3e0fa8d4d8675107ad0338fa8510c3e37c9ec742f0f1b93","observation_id":"f4fb9d4e-4931-4a37-b905-99798fdb8b54","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.393995Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.382741Z","title":"Ergodicity-breaking re- veals time optimal decision making in humans","venue":null,"work_id":"bf1cc147-4697-482e-b52f-923e5fc3bbf9","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.06661","last_updated":"2025-08-09T11:29:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:59:26.170800Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-09T08:46:32Z","title":"Peer influence breaks ergodicity in an opinion dynamics model with external information","version":2},"reference_index":14,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:58.832755Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.06661"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c4cc659960a9eb122c2f05ed26619c58c9961a551e269fb733fda7a1c2747d60","observation_id":"e430d475-9943-456e-bf45-0509460f6829","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.386080Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.375070Z","title":"Statistical mechanics of phase transitions","venue":null,"work_id":"49620ab6-b632-4a8b-9e01-242b4d7aa9e5","year":1992},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.06661","last_updated":"2025-08-09T11:29:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:59:26.170800Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-09T08:46:32Z","title":"Peer influence breaks ergodicity in an opinion dynamics model with external information","version":2},"reference_index":15,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:58.835786Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.06661"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b37a35f46b9d8c2193418efeffad25191b78a7d4bef76f6641e846cf92c22aad","observation_id":"74d69055-695b-4266-8c10-572be00c2ddf","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.378030Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.366739Z","title":"Spontaneous symmetry breaking and the transition to disorder in physics","venue":null,"work_id":"37fb5a40-34eb-42f7-a1ea-9576a7741266","year":2004},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.06661","last_updated":"2025-08-09T11:29:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:59:26.170800Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-09T08:46:32Z","title":"Peer influence breaks ergodicity in an opinion dynamics model with external information","version":2},"reference_index":16,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:58.839135Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.06661"},"observation_digest":"sha256:39682acf820dab61e4882202a6dfe53eff94537e432ba8bf4b55619f267b613d","observation_id":"8620acdc-2cbf-4b20-ae66-716b17c2a181","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.369946Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.357769Z","title":"Voter model on heterogeneous graphs","venue":null,"work_id":"31aaed83-991d-4234-843b-a540bae1a50c","year":2005},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.06661","last_updated":"2025-08-09T11:29:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:59:26.170800Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-09T08:46:32Z","title":"Peer influence breaks ergodicity in an opinion dynamics model with external information","version":2},"reference_index":17,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:58.843045Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.06661"},"observation_digest":"sha256:21b111d82f72d755bb10f8fcd5c3fd866a7c14fda3ecc0e4a19442b190a709f4","observation_id":"dc8caabe-958e-4ce5-bd81-b4b1bfa4726f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.361455Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.349287Z","title":"Does a single zealot affect an infinite group of voters? Physical review letters, 91(2):028701, 2003","venue":null,"work_id":"df10bccd-fee8-4b80-863d-07c190c4efbd","year":2003},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.06661","last_updated":"2025-08-09T11:29:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:59:26.170800Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-09T08:46:32Z","title":"Peer influence breaks ergodicity in an opinion dynamics model with external information","version":2},"reference_index":18,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:58.846241Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.06661"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e561f8f06b1c5bad431dde4c02de872120cb1d69c4f9cbb78265b731052c99c8","observation_id":"7b07d15e-080e-47b3-8ac2-e45a874d48ca","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.352144Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.340281Z","title":"Brock and Steven N","venue":null,"work_id":"e843178c-37fd-4783-ae18-61c00aef1f6f","year":2001},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.06661","last_updated":"2025-08-09T11:29:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:59:26.170800Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-09T08:46:32Z","title":"Peer influence breaks ergodicity in an opinion dynamics model with external information","version":2},"reference_index":19,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:58.849252Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.06661"},"observation_digest":"sha256:ae3a3674c4a64c68bcaa68f61a6c7c53c54c502c9522ffe2d56e7ec8094b7c6b","observation_id":"1b0ff9eb-f2e3-48d0-9218-8e84be205505","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.344151Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:58.852092Z","title":"Scaling and criticality in a stochastic multi-agent model of a financial market","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":1999},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.06661","last_updated":"2025-08-09T11:29:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:59:26.170800Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-09T08:46:32Z","title":"Peer influence breaks ergodicity in an opinion dynamics model with external information","version":2},"reference_index":20,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:58.852092Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.06661"},"observation_digest":"sha256:cb9661ced1a17b82f89abdcc6d3fad1bb30bd494c2ca21f9bdbd50f3eb56e446","observation_id":"42dcd255-ca5b-47cf-ac42-86348cf2fc5a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:58.852092Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.328838Z","title":"Whom or what does the representative individual represent? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 6(2):117–136, 1992","venue":null,"work_id":"a435e0ae-2912-465f-96ce-147821798d4d","year":1992},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.06661","last_updated":"2025-08-09T11:29:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:59:26.170800Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-09T08:46:32Z","title":"Peer influence breaks ergodicity in an opinion dynamics model with external information","version":2},"reference_index":21,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:58.855411Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.06661"},"observation_digest":"sha256:40d42e61a6cd1c565c2ccc2a4f9e558f315397d6a3d5bfd531b5a8f334c69921","observation_id":"d651b6a5-d17e-47e5-ac05-b08313b9981c","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.331514Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.320846Z","title":"Evolutionary dynamics in structured populations","venue":null,"work_id":"1d6f0337-51f8-4a14-933b-2d8d2a0b6c69","year":2010},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.06661","last_updated":"2025-08-09T11:29:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:59:26.170800Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-09T08:46:32Z","title":"Peer influence breaks ergodicity in an opinion dynamics model with external information","version":2},"reference_index":22,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:58.858561Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.06661"},"observation_digest":"sha256:42a750a545ac2a2e8c407711522abc7d409d96e0cf5bfaaadc813931940e8853","observation_id":"fe36f11f-15ba-4601-a035-9ea69dfa1028","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.323972Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.312659Z","title":"Nonequilibrium phase transition in the coevo- lution of networks and opinions","venue":null,"work_id":"6b9da911-81b0-4b86-946a-33a06d7e3b99","year":2006},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.06661","last_updated":"2025-08-09T11:29:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:59:26.170800Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-09T08:46:32Z","title":"Peer influence breaks ergodicity in an opinion dynamics model with external information","version":2},"reference_index":23,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:58.862072Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.06661"},"observation_digest":"sha256:735cb904222951f09d0eb05b4c93b6d7f8e55492c96bc1e8b743cf6c64eb1338","observation_id":"afe6d461-0161-4603-b823-7e25f06bee30","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.315485Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.305186Z","title":"Physics and financial economics (1776–2014): puzzles, ising and agent-based models","venue":null,"work_id":"1f2c93d5-696b-41bc-acce-3f3387a04e27","year":2014},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.06661","last_updated":"2025-08-09T11:29:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:59:26.170800Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-09T08:46:32Z","title":"Peer influence breaks ergodicity in an opinion dynamics model with external information","version":2},"reference_index":24,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:58.865174Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.06661"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b275751eaeba9c5bbaa43c2eac287f34315c3bca18cc95e13ddf0394bd78fa91","observation_id":"53d94838-2f5c-42c3-a127-2dafd29734ca","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.308316Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.297812Z","title":"The emergence of consensus: a primer","venue":null,"work_id":"dbe05371-f676-4800-9143-3cd0aa1556ac","year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.06661","last_updated":"2025-08-09T11:29:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:59:26.170800Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-09T08:46:32Z","title":"Peer influence breaks ergodicity in an opinion dynamics model with external information","version":2},"reference_index":25,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:58.868318Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.06661"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e738ecc44524e518a8b52d69639ffd6fdd425b852b02a690b36834b5b79fb52f","observation_id":"33c121cd-bb9c-4b33-8684-3e08cc5eeba7","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.300307Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.290256Z","title":"Binary-state dynamics on complex networks: Pair approximation and beyond","venue":null,"work_id":"2b83694a-669c-4bde-979e-e69ddbba3602","year":2013},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.06661","last_updated":"2025-08-09T11:29:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:59:26.170800Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-09T08:46:32Z","title":"Peer influence breaks ergodicity in an opinion dynamics model with external information","version":2},"reference_index":26,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:58.871281Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.06661"},"observation_digest":"sha256:cad0d53a6ed36ead92c0583c1d710b593fd09c3dd372cfb74896e5a67b5801e4","observation_id":"692d0eea-fa99-459d-aceb-bf77636ade2c","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.292945Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"cond-mat/0409484","last_updated":"2004-09-18T13:50:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T05:27:19.913442Z","submitted_at":"2004-09-18T13:50:40Z","title":"Unifying Local Dynamics in Two-State Spin Systems","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"cond-mat/0409484","doi":null,"metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"cond-mat/0409484","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.020282Z","title":"Unifying Local Dynamics in Two-State Spin Systems","venue":"cond-mat.dis-nn","work_id":"2fa0ae20-1f5f-4867-b202-92b13a1bb772","year":2004},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.06661","last_updated":"2025-08-09T11:29:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:59:26.170800Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-09T08:46:32Z","title":"Peer influence breaks ergodicity in an opinion dynamics model with external information","version":2},"reference_index":27,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:58.874518Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/cond-mat/0409484","citing_paper":"/paper/2507.06661"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a25d1599bb94283ae0e8603a1d9dca65dd9d6b0d6d70eaa4e3bd6df24be86679","observation_id":"d8d7ea1e-5f08-472b-9ba7-d65691010249","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.024075Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.281878Z","title":"Statistical mechanics of socio-economic systems with heterogeneous agents","venue":null,"work_id":"a21fd76e-6a6b-4d82-8206-094163642cfa","year":2006},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.06661","last_updated":"2025-08-09T11:29:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:59:26.170800Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-09T08:46:32Z","title":"Peer influence breaks ergodicity in an opinion dynamics model with external information","version":2},"reference_index":28,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:58.878787Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.06661"},"observation_digest":"sha256:61e710b28858eef93a6c83067785401ad5c0c458ac07f78f73807fca079a06b8","observation_id":"019f3e18-68af-42f7-9050-fc01868ea883","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.284884Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.274640Z","title":"Sociodynamics: A systematic approach to mathematical modelling in the social sciences","venue":null,"work_id":"51908ba6-4c23-4f6f-a1c7-bf861a8ee8fd","year":2006},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.06661","last_updated":"2025-08-09T11:29:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:59:26.170800Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-09T08:46:32Z","title":"Peer influence breaks ergodicity in an opinion dynamics model with external information","version":2},"reference_index":29,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:58.882211Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.06661"},"observation_digest":"sha256:648956269f65781b1a94c16deef2d385b3d25e40eebf467fb1fed71d257de744","observation_id":"57d34d8e-e67b-43b2-9bd1-f6ab5912aaa5","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.277006Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.266763Z","title":"Evolutionary prisoner’s dilemma game on a square lattice","venue":null,"work_id":"c29718cf-9b0d-48b5-bc08-5fe0526defb6","year":1998},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.06661","last_updated":"2025-08-09T11:29:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:59:26.170800Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-09T08:46:32Z","title":"Peer influence breaks ergodicity in an opinion dynamics model with external information","version":2},"reference_index":30,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:58.885709Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.06661"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a165aafe094e5b3c9156ad846c7f0f4e54bf0cab515fb6819b4c8caaa7e58c54","observation_id":"19f31d23-2ebf-4eb7-a7cc-967cc273969d","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.269535Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.257414Z","title":"Fixation probabilities in evolutionary games with the moran and fermi processes","venue":null,"work_id":"bf0070d5-8754-421b-a465-4d059281e51b","year":2015},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.06661","last_updated":"2025-08-09T11:29:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:59:26.170800Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-09T08:46:32Z","title":"Peer influence breaks ergodicity in an opinion dynamics model with external information","version":2},"reference_index":31,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:58.889277Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.06661"},"observation_digest":"sha256:5a17bd344cf28bb1c9af2ff1f5216acec054b3619dcbd594139c5521ea67b9a6","observation_id":"5408ba33-5139-424f-93a1-5570adc2838e","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.260529Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.249192Z","title":"Evolutionary dynamics and fixation probabilities in directed networks","venue":null,"work_id":"57fdf1f1-1bc7-41c9-bb86-a2ad6f31eff8","year":2009},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.06661","last_updated":"2025-08-09T11:29:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:59:26.170800Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-09T08:46:32Z","title":"Peer influence breaks ergodicity in an opinion dynamics model with external information","version":2},"reference_index":32,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:58.892297Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.06661"},"observation_digest":"sha256:ef32d94fb24ae81a1b172e1e5aeeb81c2a938b060ae5b1b038ba106b26ae115d","observation_id":"cfc3246b-6a68-43db-9749-c4f7a8be6ed3","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.252684Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"0909.1974","last_updated":"2010-06-21T13:43:59Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T01:57:45.371889Z","submitted_at":"2009-09-10T15:25:45Z","title":"Econophysics: Empirical facts and agent-based models","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"0909.1974","doi":null,"metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"0909.1974","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.005337Z","title":"Econophysics: Empirical facts and agent-based models","venue":"q-fin.GN","work_id":"be33ac91-57f5-458c-841c-e757138fd73c","year":2009},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.06661","last_updated":"2025-08-09T11:29:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:59:26.170800Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-09T08:46:32Z","title":"Peer influence breaks ergodicity in an opinion dynamics model with external information","version":2},"reference_index":33,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:58.895614Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/0909.1974","citing_paper":"/paper/2507.06661"},"observation_digest":"sha256:78637cb9e18e643c58fd1119758d40a848dc5ea1dd30037bc2d5e29feb9ef2c7","observation_id":"49a6d610-180b-42af-9db1-781b9112becf","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.011096Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.241161Z","title":"Post choice information in- tegration as a causal determinant of confidence: Novel data and a computational account","venue":null,"work_id":"bba34cde-4664-4e16-ab59-e09517f375bd","year":2015},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.06661","last_updated":"2025-08-09T11:29:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:59:26.170800Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-09T08:46:32Z","title":"Peer influence breaks ergodicity in an opinion dynamics model with external information","version":2},"reference_index":34,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:58.899583Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.06661"},"observation_digest":"sha256:ec4e1f75c76c804e772fbba5026d97dd7bf379a6561a6c1702c39e7a128a7360","observation_id":"b30e13f2-d7cf-4df2-8398-844d57b957f2","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.244038Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.232897Z","title":"On the evolution of random graphs","venue":null,"work_id":"8a39f8b0-efa6-4288-a8a5-57cbb39614e1","year":1960},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.06661","last_updated":"2025-08-09T11:29:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:59:26.170800Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-09T08:46:32Z","title":"Peer influence breaks ergodicity in an opinion dynamics model with external information","version":2},"reference_index":35,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:58.902369Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.06661"},"observation_digest":"sha256:4ae4ea4fb9c424c2f351f7e9809a8d09bd02e339dfbf24dac5d9914d7406c667","observation_id":"c2af54c6-48a4-4ef4-9881-0a2340c17843","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.235845Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.223950Z","title":"Nowak, Corina E","venue":null,"work_id":"9e5a1cb2-d6c7-4463-9f36-713388ded342","year":2010},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.06661","last_updated":"2025-08-09T11:29:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:59:26.170800Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-09T08:46:32Z","title":"Peer influence breaks ergodicity in an opinion dynamics model with external information","version":2},"reference_index":36,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:58.905489Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.06661"},"observation_digest":"sha256:1f4bbe4bd05d3e3b33a700ee45486e4e6f69ab3613a94ed7542d6eedc9cefa86","observation_id":"14454121-b1d6-4371-85dc-be987219a894","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.227435Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:58.909038Z","title":"Stochastic blockmodels: First steps","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":1983},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.06661","last_updated":"2025-08-09T11:29:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:59:26.170800Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-09T08:46:32Z","title":"Peer influence breaks ergodicity in an opinion dynamics model with external information","version":2},"reference_index":37,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:58.909038Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.06661"},"observation_digest":"sha256:16947d86c84a645154c750f7c2638fd78b8d3776d5f2adb9a82ba4b12ab9aa08","observation_id":"9073aa41-1a32-40ea-a687-d7d868696151","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:58.909038Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.211984Z","title":"Emergence of scaling in random networks","venue":null,"work_id":"2edf144f-bf0a-4ed4-98cd-34203d12b9c1","year":1999},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.06661","last_updated":"2025-08-09T11:29:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:59:26.170800Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-09T08:46:32Z","title":"Peer influence breaks ergodicity in an opinion dynamics model with external information","version":2},"reference_index":38,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:58.912573Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.06661"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b25ccf932d71f27c4ac4f3d7db87598eb1e108d5ed8f641f4a9736ea636e5b1e","observation_id":"a471990a-a949-44e2-89ad-d75f11cdaf3b","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.215296Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.202906Z","title":"What is sociophysics about? In Sociophysics: A Physicist’s Modeling of Psycho-political Phenomena , pages 3–19","venue":null,"work_id":"6d155d89-f1e1-4b95-b497-522f63e0a8f5","year":2011},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.06661","last_updated":"2025-08-09T11:29:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:59:26.170800Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-09T08:46:32Z","title":"Peer influence breaks ergodicity in an opinion dynamics model with external information","version":2},"reference_index":39,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:58.915454Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.06661"},"observation_digest":"sha256:4fcfef9168e739257230a767c6d44637314477889797fe2b5002e10a5d5afe57","observation_id":"c4c381e9-6cb6-4342-b123-53a767facc39","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.206421Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:58.918923Z","title":"The spread of behavior in an online social network experiment","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2010},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.06661","last_updated":"2025-08-09T11:29:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:59:26.170800Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-09T08:46:32Z","title":"Peer influence breaks ergodicity in an opinion dynamics model with external information","version":2},"reference_index":40,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:58.918923Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.06661"},"observation_digest":"sha256:88423d3fcd96048b32451db9d3df43553e39f3a0282e466f7bc8efc2a49f5538","observation_id":"ec93176b-ab33-4dd1-8b06-bbf49a6b2b19","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:58.918923Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.190603Z","title":"Theory of collective opinion shifts: from smooth trends to abrupt swings","venue":null,"work_id":"ab4ee9b0-f7e5-40e6-98ef-4eb801aaa854","year":2005},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.06661","last_updated":"2025-08-09T11:29:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:59:26.170800Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-09T08:46:32Z","title":"Peer influence breaks ergodicity in an opinion dynamics model with external information","version":2},"reference_index":41,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:58.922008Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.06661"},"observation_digest":"sha256:2c9978fa47338da790b2f20da13bf19ae9110e9207d3e8263f35fed90f6fcd69","observation_id":"fd78921a-9c8a-43b2-8d60-428b3acc132a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.193736Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.182756Z","title":"How social influence can undermine the wisdom of crowd effect","venue":null,"work_id":"705ffbfa-5eee-4dec-aead-3bef1021f1e5","year":2011},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.06661","last_updated":"2025-08-09T11:29:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:59:26.170800Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-09T08:46:32Z","title":"Peer influence breaks ergodicity in an opinion dynamics model with external information","version":2},"reference_index":42,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:58.925242Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.06661"},"observation_digest":"sha256:253d33ae8fb29c81fe787beae10c27f148d135dbdf2fc9c253791f868e4f5fc4","observation_id":"2b399570-2cd4-4647-b48a-2d2e45c45619","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.185481Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.173545Z","title":"Social influence and the collective dynamics of opinion formation","venue":null,"work_id":"4fda8045-f0a7-4885-b6af-8799ce0cd7cd","year":2013},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.06661","last_updated":"2025-08-09T11:29:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:59:26.170800Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-09T08:46:32Z","title":"Peer influence breaks ergodicity in an opinion dynamics model with external information","version":2},"reference_index":43,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:58.928364Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.06661"},"observation_digest":"sha256:6f17357641cecd03ac5b4d7694d8673a2808a9e559461527e00c4f8a4855cfda","observation_id":"f3f5ac06-7efb-4187-8160-2af4a4f5646a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.177229Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.165476Z","title":"Dynamics of political polarization","venue":null,"work_id":"50d10a62-70a4-472d-b295-77e6d19a8d7f","year":2007},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.06661","last_updated":"2025-08-09T11:29:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:59:26.170800Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-09T08:46:32Z","title":"Peer influence breaks ergodicity in an opinion dynamics model with external information","version":2},"reference_index":44,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:58.932061Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.06661"},"observation_digest":"sha256:94e95c2ffad29b51407b87e3081d96a9d5d94111d76d8cf116f0b2857e2daa23","observation_id":"fb869995-ff84-46cd-baaa-5d771905f219","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.168118Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.157863Z","title":"The brexit vote: a divided nation, a divided continent","venue":null,"work_id":"cb200c66-d3f3-4bca-bcb9-48150d10f5e0","year":2016},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.06661","last_updated":"2025-08-09T11:29:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:59:26.170800Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-09T08:46:32Z","title":"Peer influence breaks ergodicity in an opinion dynamics model with external information","version":2},"reference_index":45,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:58.935784Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.06661"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f13a2cc1874ba33aad273501357860dd8053d0dd136282e3bf0a62bb8572e83f","observation_id":"fa49a056-b970-4f00-8168-8bf331d858eb","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.160712Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.148735Z","title":"Cross-country trends in af- fective polarization","venue":null,"work_id":"8f609da4-cea4-4f02-b860-5dacb843d22a","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.06661","last_updated":"2025-08-09T11:29:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:59:26.170800Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-09T08:46:32Z","title":"Peer influence breaks ergodicity in an opinion dynamics model with external information","version":2},"reference_index":46,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:58.938785Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.06661"},"observation_digest":"sha256:d7425ca3af5d9af1031dd9cb80c46ddd75ec938b21325511776a11215e12e914","observation_id":"ddff3699-69fb-4bfc-a747-327df59f895b","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.152661Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.139529Z","title":"Schelling","venue":null,"work_id":"4f37a5c9-53ad-4a13-9af8-6cfa4fa3ba66","year":1978},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.06661","last_updated":"2025-08-09T11:29:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:59:26.170800Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-09T08:46:32Z","title":"Peer influence breaks ergodicity in an opinion dynamics model with external information","version":2},"reference_index":47,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:58.941846Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.06661"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c1ac95d5cbbf7146cb58789ef0c92519631616ebf2bea18569e41e673b1ce44e","observation_id":"365d9050-bf16-4e17-87fa-1d2c2983ea70","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.142330Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.130649Z","title":"Sociophysics: A Physicist’s Modeling of Psycho-political Phenomena","venue":null,"work_id":"c2794a74-162a-4d17-9b20-fab8bba8914b","year":2012},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.06661","last_updated":"2025-08-09T11:29:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:59:26.170800Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-09T08:46:32Z","title":"Peer influence breaks ergodicity in an opinion dynamics model with external information","version":2},"reference_index":48,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:58.944758Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.06661"},"observation_digest":"sha256:51dd0c450f3f21382074fba1a46ae5b8c674bc4424e05b7b098dcf60f9777cf2","observation_id":"ce9ed02a-ffcf-4638-9e34-e93b63891942","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.133880Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.122792Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"a631e3ed-2c6f-4c45-bbc1-eaa2eba40a23","year":1982},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.06661","last_updated":"2025-08-09T11:29:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:59:26.170800Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-09T08:46:32Z","title":"Peer influence breaks ergodicity in an opinion dynamics model with external information","version":2},"reference_index":49,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:58.947667Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.06661"},"observation_digest":"sha256:5b93eaa6d4bcaf86cf5c9bf6cd37a66caa1fdbeef59391bb7cc469a939e964b7","observation_id":"93966e36-f085-4628-9e0f-ba4f65fd7352","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.125734Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.114490Z","title":"Experts’ earning forecasts: Bias, herding and gossamer information","venue":null,"work_id":"d96e1d8d-7cfe-4214-933b-cf9d42b1a0e9","year":2005},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.06661","last_updated":"2025-08-09T11:29:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:59:26.170800Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-09T08:46:32Z","title":"Peer influence breaks ergodicity in an opinion dynamics model with external information","version":2},"reference_index":50,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:58.951494Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.06661"},"observation_digest":"sha256:4e79caa24464706c80a8333c55214c51f9ac3ea2bf50f784f782b0c87d4991ad","observation_id":"03c896f9-05f8-49af-a56c-0eddad3658a6","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.118102Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.105946Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"e8068d52-ec38-4d75-be4d-de9497d968c8","year":2015},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.06661","last_updated":"2025-08-09T11:29:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:59:26.170800Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-09T08:46:32Z","title":"Peer influence breaks ergodicity in an opinion dynamics model with external information","version":2},"reference_index":51,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:58.954890Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.06661"},"observation_digest":"sha256:adf4d5d3e57feca1078fa4cb20918642e5402fac56dacf8f4f01a5cba28d8a94","observation_id":"7f75d690-1152-4cc7-b8cb-a7ae949ef36d","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.109501Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.096937Z","title":"Don’t follow the leader: how ranking performance reduces meritoc- racy","venue":null,"work_id":"8ec034e8-1334-41b7-abf7-7f9a3ed1c2fe","year":2019},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.06661","last_updated":"2025-08-09T11:29:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:59:26.170800Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-09T08:46:32Z","title":"Peer influence breaks ergodicity in an opinion dynamics model with external information","version":2},"reference_index":52,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:58.957918Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.06661"},"observation_digest":"sha256:8ff87ffa45ca30d651b0bdb0b88922fce23cccec8050869ea67acf1f2c959523","observation_id":"40992334-e1fb-4445-ab0e-27adda37dfc4","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.100256Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.088715Z","title":"Imitation versus serendipity in ranking dynamics","venue":null,"work_id":"3c780ed1-c445-4eac-ad64-d9af448a5e3f","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.06661","last_updated":"2025-08-09T11:29:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:59:26.170800Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-09T08:46:32Z","title":"Peer influence breaks ergodicity in an opinion dynamics model with external information","version":2},"reference_index":53,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:58.961205Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.06661"},"observation_digest":"sha256:35b378dd867e917a3c91f3cca13bce753611cc93751292b68fccb6de56a3aa7f","observation_id":"a0f64841-cf4f-4c26-9f52-ca26e0336199","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.091611Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.078403Z","title":"Evaluating gambles using dynamics","venue":null,"work_id":"0c245758-864a-45a1-a775-98290a9558a9","year":2016},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.06661","last_updated":"2025-08-09T11:29:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:59:26.170800Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-09T08:46:32Z","title":"Peer influence breaks ergodicity in an opinion dynamics model with external information","version":2},"reference_index":54,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:58.964498Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.06661"},"observation_digest":"sha256:53290554867b43ef8b8d1139c8d98a10b32f98e938c5188915d3de00e1b4c82f","observation_id":"16a856d1-bb3a-4947-859a-ba677d6dd15e","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.081903Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.068949Z","title":"Prediction markets","venue":null,"work_id":"2eccda78-7be9-4e74-b862-be4ced6f7e3a","year":2004},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.06661","last_updated":"2025-08-09T11:29:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:59:26.170800Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-09T08:46:32Z","title":"Peer influence breaks ergodicity in an opinion dynamics model with external information","version":2},"reference_index":55,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:58.967797Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.06661"},"observation_digest":"sha256:d5308005c85ad40525922cc075cb6fd2ca8c660dfedb7ff8d8b6cc51987922e7","observation_id":"475df9fd-308e-4fa8-80e0-f3ca3a4fd578","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.072119Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.058284Z","title":"Herd behavior and aggregate fluctuations in financial markets","venue":null,"work_id":"4a0c3240-56af-45de-8cad-e0d55508b155","year":2000},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.06661","last_updated":"2025-08-09T11:29:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:59:26.170800Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-09T08:46:32Z","title":"Peer influence breaks ergodicity in an opinion dynamics model with external information","version":2},"reference_index":56,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:58.971285Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.06661"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f2a11df179f858803f1a5a48ff064f619827d0cc1b3014b15ef287f279880728","observation_id":"a150fe35-2913-4b4d-b6b8-a182e1328626","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.061600Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.048809Z","title":"Minority Games: Interacting Agents in Financial Markets","venue":null,"work_id":"bff5503d-5ebf-4704-9118-940ee1c86478","year":2005},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.06661","last_updated":"2025-08-09T11:29:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:59:26.170800Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-09T08:46:32Z","title":"Peer influence breaks ergodicity in an opinion dynamics model with external information","version":2},"reference_index":57,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:58.974270Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.06661"},"observation_digest":"sha256:1e3361d877bc3296e9b5512b37f2d28c0eb24c295d5f0972eda902ddb16fb693","observation_id":"a624862c-5a49-46dd-8835-1c655ab2f085","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.052229Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.039214Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"e49697ed-142e-4bcd-a95a-03ca59b9a23d","year":2010},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.06661","last_updated":"2025-08-09T11:29:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:59:26.170800Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-09T08:46:32Z","title":"Peer influence breaks ergodicity in an opinion dynamics model with external information","version":2},"reference_index":58,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:58.978181Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.06661"},"observation_digest":"sha256:32e1bd45fd47e6cb9d6d4aca1df7dce74ecdcd07aa2d52baaef5f3aef06a2ed7","observation_id":"51c96784-52fb-4558-a804-a00dbc04f4e0","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.042597Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.029701Z","title":"Statistical mechanics of socio-economic systems with heterogeneous agents","venue":null,"work_id":"5fd53936-cc31-4cbc-a922-0218c17fa412","year":2006},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.06661","last_updated":"2025-08-09T11:29:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:59:26.170800Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-09T08:46:32Z","title":"Peer influence breaks ergodicity in an opinion dynamics model with external information","version":2},"reference_index":59,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:58.981803Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.06661"},"observation_digest":"sha256:eea8f1917cc578895a57f4b9e48e4c501f076e9da8f23ccbb19200252d49bd9b","observation_id":"406d27af-d718-41e9-b8d1-f9fced64b02e","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:09:59.033239Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}}],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.06661","last_updated":"2025-08-09T11:29:54Z","latest_version":2,"primary_category":"physics.soc-ph","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:59:26.170800Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-09T08:46:32Z","title":"Peer influence breaks ergodicity in an opinion dynamics model with external information"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":59,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":8,"verified_exact":2,"verified_fuzzy":49},"total_outbound_references":59},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 9 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 59 of 59 outbound references and 1 inbound Pith citation observation for arXiv:2507.06661."}