{"as_of":"2026-08-08T18:57:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:6f8c22525bb4e94a65fac10955053b855cb906f9fa3a23945f1ba68fa3e5143d","coverage":[{"denominator":25,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":25,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.470996Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":25,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":25,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":0,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"cited_works","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2507.10062/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2507.10062/integrity","json":"/paper/2507.10062/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2507.10062"},"outbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.835673Z","title":"Applying human values theory to software engineering practice: Lessons and implications,","venue":null,"work_id":"78aa8736-58ee-4769-86ec-0c81ca18eacf","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.10062","last_updated":"2025-07-24T11:58:01Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:38:05.881982Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-14T08:47:19Z","title":"LLMShot: Reducing snapshot testing maintenance via LLMs","version":2},"reference_index":1,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.420056Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.10062"},"observation_digest":"sha256:ff14b81a9e9dbd5896ee1fad3ec2b19bb8f0a112b685c4f37e984272de084a6f","observation_id":"9c361db8-5b88-4988-aa03-18b951c72273","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.839129Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.828875Z","title":"An empirical study on the use of snapshot testing,","venue":null,"work_id":"3d3075b2-702e-4839-a67c-143474ff7d1e","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.10062","last_updated":"2025-07-24T11:58:01Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:38:05.881982Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-14T08:47:19Z","title":"LLMShot: Reducing snapshot testing maintenance via LLMs","version":2},"reference_index":2,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.422657Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.10062"},"observation_digest":"sha256:4eab96cec38c67ec45d1d0fe93a38e43b9c588ef94c9fb3cbbe236c317c0e4d0","observation_id":"ba607822-0f18-44e4-b569-46eef408d776","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.831490Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.821575Z","title":"Snapshot testing in practice: Benefits and drawbacks,","venue":null,"work_id":"d5287e2e-65ed-4c1b-8814-6d8c9b719f97","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.10062","last_updated":"2025-07-24T11:58:01Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:38:05.881982Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-14T08:47:19Z","title":"LLMShot: Reducing snapshot testing maintenance via LLMs","version":2},"reference_index":3,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.425079Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.10062"},"observation_digest":"sha256:ad8142453f6bf4e8967a313f1b9b4ff21b93eb448be87e61a993ed4d2e751885","observation_id":"0fffbc6c-5079-46a5-9322-fea8db56c5cc","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.824733Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.814754Z","title":"Meta open source is transferring jest to the openjs foundation,","venue":null,"work_id":"7fcb067b-64ca-4fb9-8600-d65008c3c38e","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.10062","last_updated":"2025-07-24T11:58:01Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:38:05.881982Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-14T08:47:19Z","title":"LLMShot: Reducing snapshot testing maintenance via LLMs","version":2},"reference_index":4,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.427197Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.10062"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e2bbe20c62950e3cbf61b9213f8472dba018cd3257f88e7f48e96d0d914db231","observation_id":"a8b39001-14fb-4875-b0fc-db1378e7a9a0","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.817481Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.429274Z","title":"Sapienz: multi-objective automated testing for android applications,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2016},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.10062","last_updated":"2025-07-24T11:58:01Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:38:05.881982Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-14T08:47:19Z","title":"LLMShot: Reducing snapshot testing maintenance via LLMs","version":2},"reference_index":5,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.429274Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.10062"},"observation_digest":"sha256:d1fd5cf964dd1b98cd8dd9cbd6dc9616fe0929328c5af822964c16eeb30df69f","observation_id":"b58d6149-3de5-4dd0-8b80-04d137c52209","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.429274Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.807891Z","title":"Large-scale analysis of framework-specific exceptions in android apps,","venue":null,"work_id":"3fbd4c2f-3f61-4adb-8b25-8d172c33d5f4","year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.10062","last_updated":"2025-07-24T11:58:01Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:38:05.881982Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-14T08:47:19Z","title":"LLMShot: Reducing snapshot testing maintenance via LLMs","version":2},"reference_index":6,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.431555Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.10062"},"observation_digest":"sha256:479d7edbc278ca464a2a95ba9573592f56e637998752b2ff1ffa2cdacaa70a84","observation_id":"5fc69242-b961-4165-9951-68edc1415c41","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.810838Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.800465Z","title":"Combodroid: Generating high-quality test inputs for android apps via use case combinations,","venue":null,"work_id":"946c1580-2ec0-44a2-9228-dad6d15ba9a7","year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.10062","last_updated":"2025-07-24T11:58:01Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:38:05.881982Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-14T08:47:19Z","title":"LLMShot: Reducing snapshot testing maintenance via LLMs","version":2},"reference_index":7,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.433891Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.10062"},"observation_digest":"sha256:6b38867523ab6c73bc5098e50edbbd6bdf3f117fa0823f2ae603e05957a63446","observation_id":"0307c2e2-1b40-4ba3-b1b6-c57edf42611d","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.803131Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2310.15780","last_updated":"2023-10-24T12:30:26Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T01:10:57.325051Z","submitted_at":"2023-10-24T12:30:26Z","title":"Make LLM a Testing Expert: Bringing Human-like Interaction to Mobile GUI Testing via Functionality-aware Decisions","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2310.15780","doi":null,"metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"2310.15780","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.522449Z","title":"Make LLM a Testing Expert: Bringing Human-like Interaction to Mobile GUI Testing via Functionality-aware Decisions","venue":"cs.SE","work_id":"f14a539b-e2ca-4a8b-821b-2265bb2f3e05","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.10062","last_updated":"2025-07-24T11:58:01Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:38:05.881982Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-14T08:47:19Z","title":"LLMShot: Reducing snapshot testing maintenance via LLMs","version":2},"reference_index":8,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.435862Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2310.15780","citing_paper":"/paper/2507.10062"},"observation_digest":"sha256:8eb78902a279a12e33fb1bf0857ffba4047fef3d37e58307629f4379337988fc","observation_id":"46afb975-4376-4fd1-a5f2-74fa6333b32b","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.525000Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.793155Z","title":"Benchmarking automated gui testing for android against real-world bugs,","venue":null,"work_id":"5338a18c-b9e6-4c63-a0d8-3f41029f6116","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.10062","last_updated":"2025-07-24T11:58:01Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:38:05.881982Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-14T08:47:19Z","title":"LLMShot: Reducing snapshot testing maintenance via LLMs","version":2},"reference_index":9,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.438326Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.10062"},"observation_digest":"sha256:6af67a6cc528e10fa41d90efd6d56a572712a1d8f559e81ed3f3036ec49c598c","observation_id":"f8470fb9-17ad-4129-bca8-61a8abc184a6","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.796258Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.786381Z","title":"Automated cross-platform inconsistency detection for mobile apps,","venue":null,"work_id":"e7e0d497-737e-433b-9060-753ddf27411a","year":2017},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.10062","last_updated":"2025-07-24T11:58:01Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:38:05.881982Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-14T08:47:19Z","title":"LLMShot: Reducing snapshot testing maintenance via LLMs","version":2},"reference_index":10,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.440268Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.10062"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f779660ce9105205c30febfa610e9d85a1c9060aa171416a849f71db0d795731","observation_id":"aa38ee1d-d262-463d-9372-c5d21759aafb","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.788901Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.779445Z","title":"Owl eyes: spotting ui display issues via visual understanding,","venue":null,"work_id":"e001adc7-1b16-4f59-8e99-d6c49c749491","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.10062","last_updated":"2025-07-24T11:58:01Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:38:05.881982Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-14T08:47:19Z","title":"LLMShot: Reducing snapshot testing maintenance via LLMs","version":2},"reference_index":11,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.442282Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.10062"},"observation_digest":"sha256:8d300d7eb1321210fc0c2079740742e65dd17ed03125962560bbaeb0e5bd3fb1","observation_id":"6efc88f1-06a1-4f47-b527-1619075ae1a4","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.782196Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.771878Z","title":"Glib: towards automated test oracle for graphically-rich applications,","venue":null,"work_id":"4e24a52b-9085-47eb-af39-0853a8d4adfe","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.10062","last_updated":"2025-07-24T11:58:01Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:38:05.881982Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-14T08:47:19Z","title":"LLMShot: Reducing snapshot testing maintenance via LLMs","version":2},"reference_index":12,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.444299Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.10062"},"observation_digest":"sha256:53bc36d9b9608459eb54fd582a1cd6dcb5f4dc4bea4e024a5a9130738533a3fe","observation_id":"4c576a48-7965-43f0-a48c-3af60b1d24e9","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.774561Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.764693Z","title":"Reducing combinatorics in gui testing of android applications,","venue":null,"work_id":"605d95d5-cdd4-4a4a-9a6a-21fd451097fe","year":2016},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.10062","last_updated":"2025-07-24T11:58:01Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:38:05.881982Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-14T08:47:19Z","title":"LLMShot: Reducing snapshot testing maintenance via LLMs","version":2},"reference_index":13,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.446161Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.10062"},"observation_digest":"sha256:2cfb49438c0365d2d2b1f70ab714a396f9d1707ebef2e3919913c4179332e2a7","observation_id":"b6943336-6b1d-452b-8499-df0a0330f428","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.767262Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.757464Z","title":"Translating video recordings of mobile app usages into replayable scenarios,","venue":null,"work_id":"110acc2a-3261-4b92-b2ce-cf74358e31f0","year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.10062","last_updated":"2025-07-24T11:58:01Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:38:05.881982Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-14T08:47:19Z","title":"LLMShot: Reducing snapshot testing maintenance via LLMs","version":2},"reference_index":14,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.448177Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.10062"},"observation_digest":"sha256:9643c266c9dc324d2e9c2ecbdfb2465077d08d763ae2205542d8f5eaf9402285","observation_id":"543fe5d5-a3c0-4a50-b383-1a7dfa2a84c1","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.760043Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2302.00886","last_updated":"2023-02-02T05:35:31Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T19:27:49.902542Z","submitted_at":"2023-02-02T05:35:31Z","title":"Read It, Don't Watch It: Captioning Bug Recordings Automatically","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2302.00886","doi":null,"metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"2302.00886","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.513965Z","title":"Read It, Don't Watch It: Captioning Bug Recordings Automatically","venue":"cs.SE","work_id":"b3fe3414-abd3-4193-ae9e-e0fae17bb39f","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.10062","last_updated":"2025-07-24T11:58:01Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:38:05.881982Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-14T08:47:19Z","title":"LLMShot: Reducing snapshot testing maintenance via LLMs","version":2},"reference_index":15,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.450137Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2302.00886","citing_paper":"/paper/2507.10062"},"observation_digest":"sha256:9990b8dfcdd8243ef6a8d3e29c777c83ccd8ab9c1d34a79a12fa8053a213766a","observation_id":"a7c91013-d7ba-439e-96b4-da0fe6071a12","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.516542Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.748280Z","title":"Automatic web testing using curiosity-driven reinforcement learning,","venue":null,"work_id":"c7633353-7868-4067-9905-8e1f4f5fd259","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.10062","last_updated":"2025-07-24T11:58:01Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:38:05.881982Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-14T08:47:19Z","title":"LLMShot: Reducing snapshot testing maintenance via LLMs","version":2},"reference_index":16,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.452485Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.10062"},"observation_digest":"sha256:8bd90ca2dbee8b58c444129e1b6e112ea054a59cd749ac67ec106fee9eaa79c6","observation_id":"fe4799bc-9731-4c5c-9beb-1af8cfd03659","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.752131Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.740573Z","title":"Qexplore: An exploration strategy for dynamic web applications using guided search,","venue":null,"work_id":"89cb1002-987a-4936-9ae1-2598c4755d3c","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.10062","last_updated":"2025-07-24T11:58:01Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:38:05.881982Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-14T08:47:19Z","title":"LLMShot: Reducing snapshot testing maintenance via LLMs","version":2},"reference_index":17,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.456701Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.10062"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e222974f72b3dad654591751368346ef4643bcbf11cec14b4432e91bb0fab327","observation_id":"5a59bdf9-b1c7-4fa4-a776-cd85f1fc3b0d","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.743285Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.733100Z","title":"Snapshot testing dataset,","venue":null,"work_id":"eed3919e-1d8e-49aa-bbe5-e73406bf73c5","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.10062","last_updated":"2025-07-24T11:58:01Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:38:05.881982Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-14T08:47:19Z","title":"LLMShot: Reducing snapshot testing maintenance via LLMs","version":2},"reference_index":18,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.458658Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.10062"},"observation_digest":"sha256:77a0a68f2cbeabf90578d1bbc841e340878dae07cb27c7bb4d1aa566ab77f7bb","observation_id":"db643013-0166-4f63-bde5-b6415e75cb15","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.735745Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.725673Z","title":"The metamorphosis: Automatic detection of scaling issues for mobile apps,","venue":null,"work_id":"c65f76bb-5113-483f-991c-b15c46ee9dfc","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.10062","last_updated":"2025-07-24T11:58:01Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:38:05.881982Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-14T08:47:19Z","title":"LLMShot: Reducing snapshot testing maintenance via LLMs","version":2},"reference_index":19,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.460537Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.10062"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b81c1a7e92e8a82234c65fc83f7bcf00fbc31aff3291e0a7e747ea390bd1e0e3","observation_id":"783c1d05-31c4-456f-ae20-10243c296c60","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.728338Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.462367Z","title":"Nighthawk: Fully automated localizing ui display issues via visual understanding,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.10062","last_updated":"2025-07-24T11:58:01Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:38:05.881982Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-14T08:47:19Z","title":"LLMShot: Reducing snapshot testing maintenance via LLMs","version":2},"reference_index":20,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.462367Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.10062"},"observation_digest":"sha256:024f2c40813577f90449b7b8ab4a02f3360ca5b01e013aac924909200b72a51c","observation_id":"e1b9fe5a-7869-454f-87bf-d36d8b2c7782","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.462367Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2407.03037","last_updated":"2024-12-04T08:00:42Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T18:40:52.966572Z","submitted_at":"2024-07-03T11:58:09Z","title":"Seeing is Believing: Vision-driven Non-crash Functional Bug Detection for Mobile Apps","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2407.03037","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.464252Z","title":"Seeing is believing: Vision-driven non-crash functional bug detection for mobile apps,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.10062","last_updated":"2025-07-24T11:58:01Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:38:05.881982Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-14T08:47:19Z","title":"LLMShot: Reducing snapshot testing maintenance via LLMs","version":2},"reference_index":21,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.464252Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2407.03037","citing_paper":"/paper/2507.10062"},"observation_digest":"sha256:1af3d4d814392cf8d7264f9da56567ff352936e260e37742d7182b31b0122a67","observation_id":"edeaa0bd-7511-4fe0-92f0-71cd2b74cdd5","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.464252Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.714559Z","title":"Pointfreeco/swift-snapshot-testing: delightful swift snapshot testing","venue":null,"work_id":"db843c72-0267-4bc6-8e80-2efb7aff2dc3","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.10062","last_updated":"2025-07-24T11:58:01Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:38:05.881982Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-14T08:47:19Z","title":"LLMShot: Reducing snapshot testing maintenance via LLMs","version":2},"reference_index":22,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.466834Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.10062"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a1a4450d65055955242971062258e82b508be3380324c543dc0ed74918e40a91","observation_id":"111492fc-0408-41e3-95bc-2de9c7c09f51","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.717401Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2503.19786","last_updated":"2025-03-25T15:52:34Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T02:11:23.670680Z","submitted_at":"2025-03-25T15:52:34Z","title":"Gemma 3 Technical Report","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2503.19786","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.468843Z","title":"Gemma 3 technical report,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.10062","last_updated":"2025-07-24T11:58:01Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:38:05.881982Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-14T08:47:19Z","title":"LLMShot: Reducing snapshot testing maintenance via LLMs","version":2},"reference_index":23,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.468843Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2503.19786","citing_paper":"/paper/2507.10062"},"observation_digest":"sha256:22596df77341e4217a7d553bc85cb4f9057b44366ff01246cd3bf8a3a3f88d46","observation_id":"48f4d4f2-8bcf-40ae-8b7c-fbac95b5048a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.468843Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.705847Z","title":"Ollama: A lightweight, extensible framework for building and running language models on the local machine,","venue":null,"work_id":"9cde8967-a1ed-40f1-8600-7af69d93690d","year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.10062","last_updated":"2025-07-24T11:58:01Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:38:05.881982Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-14T08:47:19Z","title":"LLMShot: Reducing snapshot testing maintenance via LLMs","version":2},"reference_index":24,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.470996Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.10062"},"observation_digest":"sha256:42a8a02ec008bd2cb1222cdfef53c6b66b16c61f95ceb7f9409612b05889b1fb","observation_id":"665eaf94-c0ff-4c23-b197-18b5c0f3f037","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.709304Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2103.06018","last_updated":"2021-03-10T12:34:36Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T10:48:36.285835Z","submitted_at":"2021-03-10T12:34:36Z","title":"Automatic Web Testing using Curiosity-Driven Reinforcement Learning","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2103.06018","doi":null,"metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"2103.06018","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.502834Z","title":"Automatic Web Testing using Curiosity-Driven Reinforcement Learning","venue":"cs.SE","work_id":"9ca9042a-f921-4712-8ee5-be451dbccde9","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.10062","last_updated":"2025-07-24T11:58:01Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:38:05.881982Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-14T08:47:19Z","title":"LLMShot: Reducing snapshot testing maintenance via LLMs","version":2},"reference_index":2021,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.454516Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2103.06018","citing_paper":"/paper/2507.10062"},"observation_digest":"sha256:3567efbd6aa0b7f4b8c50db3fcac876bb89b937f08add9b85a1b47775cc542ba","observation_id":"495cae9b-2761-4f87-95a9-376383e18b7d","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.507607Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"metadata_mismatch"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}}],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.10062","last_updated":"2025-07-24T11:58:01Z","latest_version":2,"primary_category":"cs.SE","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:38:05.881982Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-14T08:47:19Z","title":"LLMShot: Reducing snapshot testing maintenance via LLMs"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":25,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":1,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":4,"verified_exact":2,"verified_fuzzy":18},"total_outbound_references":25},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 8 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 25 of 25 outbound references and 0 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2507.10062."}