{"as_of":"2026-08-14T20:09:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:e41f4668de0130df3ae17aeae30a991ae5097b1c5ac0847db22de76dc0cff830","coverage":[{"denominator":79,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":79,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:55.966146Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":80,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":80,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":1,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-05-08T03:46:43.221811Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"arxiv_reference","source_observed_at":"2026-05-11T21:56:17.082360Z","state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.14741","last_updated":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T17:28:37.211156Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","title":"Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2507.14741","doi":null,"metadata_source":"arxiv_reference","pith_arxiv_id":"2507.14741","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-05T21:23:00.469572Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"ddc7d87c-eb8e-453f-886c-263e5653443e","year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2604.24071","last_updated":"2026-04-27T05:56:56Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-11T02:43:19.640356Z","submitted_at":"2026-04-27T05:56:56Z","title":"PeeriScope: A Multi-Faceted Framework for Evaluating Peer Review Quality","version":1},"reference_index":19,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-05-08T03:46:43.221811Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2507.14741","citing_paper":"/paper/2604.24071"},"observation_digest":"sha256:6016ed2aaf9f3f2e5dbd3f30a2a21e1bc3941e1d87055a9f35957a99c80b1f34","observation_id":"d3619ad9-ebc8-4bc6-8156-3e0ff0dbabb1","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-05-11T21:56:17.126265Z","resolver_source":"arxiv_id","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}}],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2507.14741/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2507.14741/integrity","json":"/paper/2507.14741/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2507.14741"},"outbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:10.879724Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"b430caa8-83d8-4a34-8592-4541f8ea3aaf","year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.14741","last_updated":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T17:28:37.211156Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","title":"Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity","version":1},"reference_index":1,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:48.102099Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.14741"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c7a8a05fa80b90a03602fc6722f6e20b6bdbe70a22b3628d4f697d89ad73ee20","observation_id":"3edb15bc-1ca7-4e4f-a828-bf0275936101","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:10.952924Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:10.718476Z","title":"J., Sugimoto, C","venue":null,"work_id":"ec5c7b26-7603-49bc-8520-1d4c35334b99","year":2013},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.14741","last_updated":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T17:28:37.211156Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","title":"Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity","version":1},"reference_index":2,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:48.164327Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.14741"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a9588b3ee557b5b90c41f2c55efc3b4cd89db4e6abfa6f9d5923227b1403dcee","observation_id":"2a53cf5c-69f0-44a3-9ac8-1be6fb49b675","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:10.822463Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:10.556900Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"b7b15545-e449-465b-9e46-be159660548d","year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.14741","last_updated":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T17:28:37.211156Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","title":"Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity","version":1},"reference_index":3,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:48.216686Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.14741"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e08dd81d2e5544459a4736e9b06bfae1de08211fededc9e139e10773d613e3a2","observation_id":"a33f4d47-c028-4af9-93b7-7a5750315f95","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:10.622621Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:10.384458Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"25fae780-d8f2-462d-9a81-e2226424ed9d","year":2009},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.14741","last_updated":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T17:28:37.211156Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","title":"Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity","version":1},"reference_index":4,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:48.283775Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.14741"},"observation_digest":"sha256:d27f6840bb17f81e5e5c2af109935b72c6b2ca9ba2ac000c763c43713cb6fa19","observation_id":"af510ca1-eafc-4145-a11e-7d944ab4cdf9","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:10.467125Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:10.159340Z","title":"Who’s afraid of peer review? (2013)","venue":null,"work_id":"588ccd40-9ebf-4458-87e5-2b3487090caf","year":2013},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.14741","last_updated":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T17:28:37.211156Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","title":"Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity","version":1},"reference_index":5,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:48.357417Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.14741"},"observation_digest":"sha256:da4dc19c08134509f0d440f67775d538e1722e1819778a6b6334eadad54659b7","observation_id":"2979060a-e379-418b-97f2-cf9e3a3e44cc","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:10.268586Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:09.966170Z","title":"& Heavlin, W","venue":null,"work_id":"8f6d759e-54f9-42a3-9a48-77052a0bc921","year":2017},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.14741","last_updated":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T17:28:37.211156Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","title":"Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity","version":1},"reference_index":6,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:48.442765Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.14741"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c78efecea33d90bda940bea8f04424d0fb0b69a71588edd4a71dae5c3348a7ac","observation_id":"01dc32e3-ed0d-400f-97c1-78b6db53570f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:10.033881Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:09.727481Z","title":"Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals","venue":null,"work_id":"0c958131-2fcf-439b-9a57-7d884f8b3ca4","year":2006},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.14741","last_updated":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T17:28:37.211156Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","title":"Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity","version":1},"reference_index":7,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:48.527822Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.14741"},"observation_digest":"sha256:31f6976f5921dc015c4959966413c7c3a800aebcbf2e47c70d0cfd5339ab2b28","observation_id":"f6bcad52-caea-42ed-9949-7ebe3df7b035","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:09.842450Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:09.496486Z","title":"& Raphael, E","venue":null,"work_id":"2a901966-c6f5-4da8-bf41-c8198346d952","year":2013},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.14741","last_updated":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T17:28:37.211156Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","title":"Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity","version":1},"reference_index":8,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:48.592887Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.14741"},"observation_digest":"sha256:77766550902830e2c4a5a3bc6f3b67b3427e723ef15f728de5651f5b4292dc52","observation_id":"b1fa6f9f-13b9-49a4-820a-6d61fe1440af","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:09.604125Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:09.302210Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"05b122ef-351e-4ebb-9b6b-067c85c704da","year":2006},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.14741","last_updated":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T17:28:37.211156Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","title":"Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity","version":1},"reference_index":9,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:48.657468Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.14741"},"observation_digest":"sha256:409b393496dec29afa5fc2c599e5a6fd01d8bbbd84dd1475533c33bd73d1aa9f","observation_id":"f43f21ed-8f95-4ebd-98c4-df54c5e3c53a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:09.382792Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:09.060944Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"aad3408f-8985-418d-8a12-36d63a4bcf2b","year":2019},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.14741","last_updated":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T17:28:37.211156Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","title":"Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity","version":1},"reference_index":10,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:48.719808Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.14741"},"observation_digest":"sha256:1ee013157d492603202c822462bad23d8d4107ac117cd986615604fa6b253bd4","observation_id":"e260d6d8-620e-4fc1-82f0-9313c4025b92","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:09.116402Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:08.828342Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"350e36c8-2fbf-4b72-b061-8f75c41eefc6","year":2019},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.14741","last_updated":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T17:28:37.211156Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","title":"Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity","version":1},"reference_index":11,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:48.787381Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.14741"},"observation_digest":"sha256:89f6202a867adfe503f1d51818129e216e3afa6955481607df2ca28cee606d5b","observation_id":"dacd667c-b283-4deb-803c-615bc53c214b","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:08.928592Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:08.609191Z","title":"this work is antithetical to the spirit of research","venue":null,"work_id":"09737fa7-003d-440c-ba0b-2f49a224c28b","year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.14741","last_updated":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T17:28:37.211156Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","title":"Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity","version":1},"reference_index":12,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:48.884668Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.14741"},"observation_digest":"sha256:62b6c92be14172fc110f89d5facbae2ef3966da3aaf2c1697a88a4426c6bc2a3","observation_id":"cce686ff-7b3e-41e3-ba65-0316e35f73d2","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:08.699455Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:08.331339Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"38d744aa-7ba0-4d71-b45f-79ca11c92711","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.14741","last_updated":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T17:28:37.211156Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","title":"Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity","version":1},"reference_index":13,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:48.941931Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.14741"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a6266a450bba4fb5212702c76ec17ec5064e47e72437d170d9d01e1c06e6702c","observation_id":"fd33b5ef-e625-4d1e-817b-83e003eef0a4","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:08.488867Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:08.080378Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"0e79450c-0acb-44f1-85dd-5a06380c4ed8","year":2008},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.14741","last_updated":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T17:28:37.211156Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","title":"Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity","version":1},"reference_index":14,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:49.042939Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.14741"},"observation_digest":"sha256:9dc27101ea4e86e47cdf0728048db519462e2a9e14bc95444ca2a8de1a389b63","observation_id":"be80a147-81fa-4836-936f-797180675ee6","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:08.207910Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:07.768583Z","title":"& Maruˇsi´c, A","venue":null,"work_id":"61d8ee48-a1e7-46a4-8730-168ccbd807bd","year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.14741","last_updated":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T17:28:37.211156Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","title":"Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity","version":1},"reference_index":15,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:49.105378Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.14741"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f9ecec47362c4e4188f8653e89d00f3243ddb78b7d206251a5b76ff35d625ead","observation_id":"a7cb8b77-0dcc-4ab0-9062-c91f8ea1a950","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:07.878927Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:07.487514Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"95912c47-19d6-45a3-958c-7482ca1c42b2","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.14741","last_updated":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T17:28:37.211156Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","title":"Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity","version":1},"reference_index":16,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:49.176296Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.14741"},"observation_digest":"sha256:3eb5f6f5545c29d72a46bc9c5eec50e7164f156334df52355292ca3cfc6d95f2","observation_id":"f2af6909-48bb-40d4-b0a1-f5399ea4daca","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:07.631643Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:07.283479Z","title":"J., Kahn, S","venue":null,"work_id":"50ad94de-c3f3-4494-a4de-feeec759dc3f","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.14741","last_updated":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T17:28:37.211156Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","title":"Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity","version":1},"reference_index":17,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:49.258696Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.14741"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f4de49208ae0e65c877c81e5e7826778ff119caaadc8eb89ec7038c75a939878","observation_id":"76826903-e388-4110-ab73-273044e8f1f9","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:07.385599Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:06.971052Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"e928daab-b902-4cef-a706-2c5f62a66fe9","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.14741","last_updated":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T17:28:37.211156Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","title":"Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity","version":1},"reference_index":18,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:49.319138Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.14741"},"observation_digest":"sha256:354f8a6a1bd324ee0cc6d2b33adeb4d131c458c551f6806ac5c92e4bc781e38f","observation_id":"b997b496-5185-435d-a5dc-bf7543e29fb2","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:07.154290Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:06.646392Z","title":"& Fang, F","venue":null,"work_id":"2b7cf92e-3499-4f47-921e-d24165057c08","year":2014},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.14741","last_updated":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T17:28:37.211156Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","title":"Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity","version":1},"reference_index":19,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:49.430695Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.14741"},"observation_digest":"sha256:d23afe1d35e966602d550014b21f03839df29e43a7e542ef8b25eb76beb53775","observation_id":"1c42655b-6273-4d36-98f0-5b4580438ddd","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:06.803877Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:06.414316Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"7d24c640-e30d-4610-bb05-0378ce98b51b","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.14741","last_updated":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T17:28:37.211156Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","title":"Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity","version":1},"reference_index":20,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:49.574999Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.14741"},"observation_digest":"sha256:df3a9f00ab4eef23d833f1c4adc32befd4d71998d3d00681381dc8efa1acd2d3","observation_id":"cf93e1e0-d499-49f8-9270-8f105c1fd036","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:06.498830Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:06.201402Z","title":"& ˙Zela´zniewicz, A","venue":null,"work_id":"36ba6ca7-ea75-43dd-9417-8ad061cb8ffb","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.14741","last_updated":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T17:28:37.211156Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","title":"Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity","version":1},"reference_index":21,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:49.669185Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.14741"},"observation_digest":"sha256:81cf99dbfe0919372ce9507104edfdf661edf88e3d30b09be5f3dcbf897b329e","observation_id":"67ffdf12-aa31-413a-8a8c-186d16c71b14","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:06.297423Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:05.977445Z","title":"G., Politzer-Ahles, S","venue":null,"work_id":"02c4f586-96c1-4232-89eb-80e2cf457211","year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.14741","last_updated":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T17:28:37.211156Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","title":"Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity","version":1},"reference_index":22,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:49.778580Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.14741"},"observation_digest":"sha256:0b56e57176025f418de6575f348cf16a9068f338fd0f5341d95caf34f613fd16","observation_id":"9530352e-2ebc-40ea-84cf-968710f09552","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:06.104195Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:05.725471Z","title":"& Teplitskiy, M","venue":null,"work_id":"c536f940-2e08-4224-976e-2e9517be994b","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.14741","last_updated":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T17:28:37.211156Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","title":"Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity","version":1},"reference_index":23,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:49.867685Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.14741"},"observation_digest":"sha256:4363235821707192f62a77020b449cebb17a3d1a3c6c101c4bf5339704a7a6e5","observation_id":"9dccc325-c5e3-4817-9c1c-629b816c227a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:05.859860Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:05.538712Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"9de007c1-bd32-49f4-b1e5-32e689d57af3","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.14741","last_updated":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T17:28:37.211156Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","title":"Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity","version":1},"reference_index":24,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:49.919384Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.14741"},"observation_digest":"sha256:d0462643b9e8e42145dc17ffd33836b47f8e78c90955cac480ad015c33e7e364","observation_id":"27c3b7dd-b4b9-4c7c-99c5-db9fada9abb2","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:05.594872Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:05.393577Z","title":"& Dinesh, S","venue":null,"work_id":"ec7f09e1-a00c-4a0a-bf1f-5441101e53f5","year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.14741","last_updated":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T17:28:37.211156Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","title":"Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity","version":1},"reference_index":25,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:50.022888Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.14741"},"observation_digest":"sha256:293ec7f1c180a3586110bab40dc9409b937b6f2d60ea535012915c421015fae9","observation_id":"8d44041a-099d-49b9-81c4-b10b78d3dd84","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:05.439437Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2211.06398","last_updated":"2022-11-07T16:19:42Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T13:48:05.020687Z","submitted_at":"2022-11-07T16:19:42Z","title":"Investigating Fairness Disparities in Peer Review: A Language Model Enhanced Approach","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2211.06398","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:50.186489Z","title":"& Roth, D","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.14741","last_updated":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T17:28:37.211156Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","title":"Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity","version":1},"reference_index":26,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:50.186489Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2211.06398","citing_paper":"/paper/2507.14741"},"observation_digest":"sha256:2f98857d710fec911ef64bb6f33a5798cefa1aced534345084ddb20f8b27d50b","observation_id":"936c59de-0a27-4d8e-badb-826fd81a5c0e","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:50.186489Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1903.10676","last_updated":"2019-09-10T18:10:35Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T16:56:51.076116Z","submitted_at":"2019-03-26T05:11:46Z","title":"SciBERT: A Pretrained Language Model for Scientific Text","version":3},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"1903.10676","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:50.300656Z","title":"& Cohan, A","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2019},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.14741","last_updated":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T17:28:37.211156Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","title":"Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity","version":1},"reference_index":27,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:50.300656Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/1903.10676","citing_paper":"/paper/2507.14741"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f66949f50b314f017801cf33b9cca3be6a6940f2b42aadc5033ca68336659fb2","observation_id":"635b7062-a728-4c37-9f92-b4bb027a9797","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:50.300656Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:05.237016Z","title":"K., Navlakha, M., Agarwal, M","venue":null,"work_id":"46e87c89-cae3-424f-bc64-75d94f6c3708","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.14741","last_updated":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T17:28:37.211156Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","title":"Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity","version":1},"reference_index":28,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:50.438845Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.14741"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e45a7a6a2d9ffb45618186686b95db1965375c85c58925142ed7e09333f8cf6a","observation_id":"0abae862-3a4e-4921-8ffc-9a7c2e33798e","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:05.314561Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:05.021100Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"6434d17c-cff7-45dd-a032-149b1c2c07d5","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.14741","last_updated":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T17:28:37.211156Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","title":"Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity","version":1},"reference_index":29,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:50.572306Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.14741"},"observation_digest":"sha256:df800aaa11a40577fbad83cb3dcd75ea5712859f4a5b9197eece000c7834c346","observation_id":"9c4b5c7b-2ebd-425a-b25e-ef6cee74d020","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:05.139600Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:04.821406Z","title":"& Falk Delgado, A","venue":null,"work_id":"a70f6f13-69f1-4fbe-905a-d62bd3d1de88","year":2019},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.14741","last_updated":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T17:28:37.211156Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","title":"Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity","version":1},"reference_index":30,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:50.630005Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.14741"},"observation_digest":"sha256:bb42c658ac5fbc1f48f7789358f5da3476e8e239ed71afebfc4fae736d0193e8","observation_id":"3fc6e7ed-33c3-4d4e-be2b-b6e2fe4f4d07","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:04.933172Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:04.506558Z","title":"Analysis of the language used in the reports of peer-review journals","venue":null,"work_id":"c0614237-a746-4296-8ecd-7bbf52d35998","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.14741","last_updated":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T17:28:37.211156Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","title":"Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity","version":1},"reference_index":31,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:50.717308Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.14741"},"observation_digest":"sha256:0bfaed1cc686df375d11290b00d8aff1519d35ab2e8576e14441116d95a4e50e","observation_id":"aea1ac84-1ad5-44de-80ac-59011d68e482","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:04.639937Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:04.239291Z","title":"Textual features of peer review predict top-cited papers: An interpretable machine learning perspective","venue":null,"work_id":"470b7f33-0de6-4f8a-adc9-f01c31fe1d8c","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.14741","last_updated":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T17:28:37.211156Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","title":"Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity","version":1},"reference_index":32,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:50.864199Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.14741"},"observation_digest":"sha256:13d4ec0a086c679055e5db6c5bd724afc8d62de74ad266ce775538e89922a37c","observation_id":"5d9ec5ea-d963-4031-8af2-84f0239696ac","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:04.378377Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:03.993758Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"421c2947-087a-4021-91e0-0f57b097c5d4","year":1971},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.14741","last_updated":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T17:28:37.211156Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","title":"Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity","version":1},"reference_index":33,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:50.970428Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.14741"},"observation_digest":"sha256:1eff69f6903c725dff49a1729bbba936ca0f54514fc1148fc2c611c7aa97aa9b","observation_id":"04e97d74-94e3-4d94-b54c-a29368f53d98","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:04.105193Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:03.772238Z","title":"W.,(1997)","venue":null,"work_id":"d0333383-6ca1-4436-bd22-dd2af4eec615","year":1997},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.14741","last_updated":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T17:28:37.211156Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","title":"Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity","version":1},"reference_index":34,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:51.063804Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.14741"},"observation_digest":"sha256:9da818d6b08c8b48cab20338c532bb2cd12bf79a76061937e70b13c715aa7784","observation_id":"b7865137-dfbc-4f94-b38d-4d15da8a9af5","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:03.873832Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:03.470400Z","title":"N., Langerhuizen, D","venue":null,"work_id":"cd214a83-0768-49bb-b1c2-6f64da0d68d1","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.14741","last_updated":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T17:28:37.211156Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","title":"Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity","version":1},"reference_index":35,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:51.126872Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.14741"},"observation_digest":"sha256:ea3e3df5cfe8b8d4395734f30263618676cfe2dac89f501382a397930d41b458","observation_id":"84d56c58-eed9-449c-9337-4db33b125989","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:03.595779Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:03.273866Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"95cf7a23-f46b-4366-a335-26d0d6c8191e","year":2017},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.14741","last_updated":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T17:28:37.211156Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","title":"Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity","version":1},"reference_index":36,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:51.200178Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.14741"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f317dfae7dd92de097211db4d6d9b29ba9c267993143ac4c5f79e8e4de887e9c","observation_id":"57298fa6-b533-4a56-b989-e0f3507a03fe","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:03.372770Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:03.106774Z","title":"A., Jawaid, M","venue":null,"work_id":"4150612b-01b0-41c8-a3a4-422aa8296635","year":2006},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.14741","last_updated":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T17:28:37.211156Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","title":"Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity","version":1},"reference_index":37,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:51.317434Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.14741"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c507ab4af7952df38bf674be86f519cb6ddd648f5b32dd396ac3a91f53216d92","observation_id":"a731fbcb-719b-406e-80ce-1ee4d3965823","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:03.148216Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:02.924831Z","title":"Interactive functions of language in peer reviews of medical papers written by non- native users of english","venue":null,"work_id":"a73043bb-5e9b-4773-a684-cebf576e8d28","year":1996},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.14741","last_updated":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T17:28:37.211156Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","title":"Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity","version":1},"reference_index":38,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:51.459122Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.14741"},"observation_digest":"sha256:4a26b0f59e3fc3e26e0738dbd9098be0f7fc5f652d05499a60c67a76b4a18833","observation_id":"5fb1cc85-4b20-4c7c-b3a9-e83ef1e9ee83","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:03.007138Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:02.767686Z","title":"& Diani, G","venue":null,"work_id":"ba153ded-fd49-4297-9dd6-c9f2329a3a59","year":2009},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.14741","last_updated":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T17:28:37.211156Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","title":"Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity","version":1},"reference_index":39,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:51.567146Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.14741"},"observation_digest":"sha256:cb0ab472ccf73986ede035494b1b387904f23463f36062074f3f937fc117f565","observation_id":"e93894b0-11d8-46e7-8ee0-4a34a2f4a20b","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:02.828478Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:02.595025Z","title":"& Mckeachie, W","venue":null,"work_id":"e92a3261-9059-49f7-831b-097411bbab77","year":2011},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.14741","last_updated":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T17:28:37.211156Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","title":"Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity","version":1},"reference_index":40,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:51.729397Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.14741"},"observation_digest":"sha256:2c47fec93dc50b2e688ef3425fca1c65dde49d14169554dcc9927bad6e89ed95","observation_id":"c4011fff-d03c-4850-a102-f0a840a97758","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:02.661304Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:02.355754Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"af98bf7a-86b9-4727-bc96-84331b3b6841","year":2006},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.14741","last_updated":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T17:28:37.211156Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","title":"Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity","version":1},"reference_index":41,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:51.854375Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.14741"},"observation_digest":"sha256:25b32598887b09e89350d37a0c36c1b55030252ea0f1908e35a02ffdc8590a2b","observation_id":"dd938c3c-eb3e-4aa5-8d6d-023d701354a5","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:02.469766Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:02.210351Z","title":"& Timperley, H","venue":null,"work_id":"e9a2f490-e54f-4cd9-8a24-3964ac18a9e0","year":2007},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.14741","last_updated":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T17:28:37.211156Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","title":"Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity","version":1},"reference_index":42,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:51.950298Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.14741"},"observation_digest":"sha256:49a52e3dd1986986b8cb6b0858e3163ac942ce0308a256fcab2018f9a7b49716","observation_id":"9d5284f4-489c-442e-968d-acca80c76d68","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:02.281865Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:02.015323Z","title":"& Molloy, E","venue":null,"work_id":"abb1377d-a975-4d8c-ac22-59729e892874","year":2013},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.14741","last_updated":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T17:28:37.211156Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","title":"Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity","version":1},"reference_index":43,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:52.007589Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.14741"},"observation_digest":"sha256:8701d7b6f68fa961277d01c1b82b3f69659b982224ce2d5a6d6047eb819b1fc3","observation_id":"830b43b6-f39f-4f95-84fc-bcecf4695cf5","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:02.119534Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:01.894911Z","title":"Differing perceptions in the feedback process","venue":null,"work_id":"9058c7ff-4929-4091-b2ed-17d2d5648660","year":2006},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.14741","last_updated":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T17:28:37.211156Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","title":"Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity","version":1},"reference_index":44,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:52.097202Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.14741"},"observation_digest":"sha256:87fbf4bac38853a1d3e602483efbeb94dcdaf1b0720798e25105f418c0ad3d7a","observation_id":"fae1f14f-93a2-4932-9561-2a84f4121f12","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:01.934525Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:01.766972Z","title":"R., James, R., Berghella, V","venue":null,"work_id":"3f07b145-a630-417d-9846-fe8f8696a354","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.14741","last_updated":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T17:28:37.211156Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","title":"Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity","version":1},"reference_index":45,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:52.262770Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.14741"},"observation_digest":"sha256:102182cf1dfce62ef8e3bc72230e05bf0e4f3343e9c32f365c625765f54b3f26","observation_id":"4aeff596-f3fb-4a16-8feb-5914471cedf4","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:01.808306Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:01.670796Z","title":"S., Knutsen, J","venue":null,"work_id":"da6bec6d-212c-41b7-a959-4191494d4ba8","year":2019},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.14741","last_updated":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T17:28:37.211156Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","title":"Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity","version":1},"reference_index":46,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:52.431317Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.14741"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a8f9f7e02f72f868491b9022db5e33074adccf22af765e9b7ea282a04156d0b7","observation_id":"8f01fdb1-1a8f-45fe-a2f2-7d86f4501511","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:01.725067Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:01.559494Z","title":"The peer-review crisis (2022)","venue":null,"work_id":"5e98b290-84d5-42c9-8d5d-24f1b289bcae","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.14741","last_updated":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T17:28:37.211156Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","title":"Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity","version":1},"reference_index":47,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:52.495993Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.14741"},"observation_digest":"sha256:6fd426ff48614e85f8752c0ae468ecd0790021db744d1c4f83e34d8c5ea3ad03","observation_id":"93400d71-e2e1-4297-b6ac-653f72f823b6","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:01.594813Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:01.417874Z","title":"& Smits, J","venue":null,"work_id":"dec42980-15d6-4dac-a039-3be69508ed47","year":2017},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.14741","last_updated":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T17:28:37.211156Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","title":"Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity","version":1},"reference_index":48,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:52.577436Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.14741"},"observation_digest":"sha256:da591bddd21d4a37cf5f7fd830cf04f30fbbce76357e0e0ecc4cab6c9d54fa28","observation_id":"d3ce79ce-069e-41fd-b83d-6eec5b50dc8d","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:01.491764Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:01.217862Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"22a3e638-6a8f-46ff-aaf6-7ec7be0532f8","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.14741","last_updated":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T17:28:37.211156Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","title":"Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity","version":1},"reference_index":49,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:52.735893Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.14741"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e4c8f28b75ee7fd0d61ef4dab87999f7aca2b82c2cbd3a4f42c28616fbbe1b2c","observation_id":"5d6e6829-721c-4550-ad68-1e1de8215037","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:01.341736Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:01.065841Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"ccacedfe-d811-40c1-8a11-66a7a154a835","year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.14741","last_updated":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T17:28:37.211156Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","title":"Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity","version":1},"reference_index":50,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:52.826727Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.14741"},"observation_digest":"sha256:cd79fcde45eebc2d07691c4b847902911cf4de5be4d46f2056fceeef7a329e78","observation_id":"92850a48-407e-46ef-bf2f-d480a5ece9ba","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:01.113330Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:00.980999Z","title":"Self-archiving and license to publish","venue":null,"work_id":"b309391e-618f-487c-a5d8-682f9f3413c9","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.14741","last_updated":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T17:28:37.211156Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","title":"Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity","version":1},"reference_index":51,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:52.910026Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.14741"},"observation_digest":"sha256:1d057eef2c196e2e2dfb034602d859ed91e57d5da1c8c6e0c1b841d917e8c4e4","observation_id":"553a555b-9c05-42da-b000-e02fa06f61c8","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:01.030241Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:00.847586Z","title":"Plos text and data mining","venue":null,"work_id":"011b7f7c-4f56-435d-b2dc-ef90218ba523","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.14741","last_updated":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T17:28:37.211156Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","title":"Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity","version":1},"reference_index":52,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:52.996391Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.14741"},"observation_digest":"sha256:1c94a25a4f26fe6b2de94c83c578e93a79e372c67c32b7b94f057e80b7398c92","observation_id":"2586d2ab-efde-4470-a257-59b796b323dd","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:00.909701Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:00.616561Z","title":"Genderize.io (2024)","venue":null,"work_id":"c74872e5-f9f8-42ec-a019-ddfd30a959e7","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.14741","last_updated":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T17:28:37.211156Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","title":"Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity","version":1},"reference_index":53,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:53.095925Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.14741"},"observation_digest":"sha256:d130b3cfee650e712415d47d578b79686c5ee76c3af49e3d4760f027acb06f7c","observation_id":"69162d24-8b46-4049-ae26-f785bef634fe","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:00.738610Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:00.379132Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"0a543d18-61a9-4e93-9a84-f0289178749e","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.14741","last_updated":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T17:28:37.211156Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","title":"Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity","version":1},"reference_index":54,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:53.191239Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.14741"},"observation_digest":"sha256:69b48ac7b0165c9aebc220e534e29fbc5df565048abf5e5fea0c0c69c7787a7f","observation_id":"3b20c98d-5855-4ce4-aaf3-634e654f505c","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:00.478122Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:00.131956Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"e53edb41-b627-4eb0-8762-e1ed9cf03594","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.14741","last_updated":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T17:28:37.211156Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","title":"Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity","version":1},"reference_index":55,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:53.335975Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.14741"},"observation_digest":"sha256:ec4c0cc4177517b95a1603853ceb2b49ce1013160c74290f5607c50c460ab958","observation_id":"70d06b13-2879-4f88-869d-d37e56fcc07e","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:54:00.247543Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:59.857685Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"a5315129-bb5e-4276-9de4-852c356cecfe","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.14741","last_updated":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T17:28:37.211156Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","title":"Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity","version":1},"reference_index":56,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:53.465796Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.14741"},"observation_digest":"sha256:ddcc56a5da7b1c586e244e2d3319fc6fbe97384ff5a6256077da21a97d63b9a5","observation_id":"23bf6c31-df0e-4278-b556-3def5faae5fe","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:59.960366Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:59.602100Z","title":"Nature index (2024)","venue":null,"work_id":"38a8206b-83cf-43ed-ba6f-cfdb29272aa1","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.14741","last_updated":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T17:28:37.211156Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","title":"Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity","version":1},"reference_index":57,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:53.518952Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.14741"},"observation_digest":"sha256:2bd6865e72abcde8ca0ce3ae1636b286530f8bd462c951cc136ee3f90b91e37d","observation_id":"cd4ce50e-1278-48cf-9f9c-941648b5623f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:59.704433Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:59.411116Z","title":"& Piwowar, H","venue":null,"work_id":"5cf9e92f-ce0e-4779-a317-08b000770d85","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.14741","last_updated":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T17:28:37.211156Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","title":"Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity","version":1},"reference_index":58,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:53.620904Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.14741"},"observation_digest":"sha256:80a13b990a859dd2176015df4aee59f02cb3e16d090b0f6468e14046b4ab30e4","observation_id":"35ee33b7-eda6-4d22-bcbe-13e535736fbe","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:59.490311Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:59.174539Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"82e57f40-1cb3-4f4c-938c-ccccf920c2a3","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.14741","last_updated":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T17:28:37.211156Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","title":"Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity","version":1},"reference_index":59,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:53.776513Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.14741"},"observation_digest":"sha256:ba99d71d8a276ea764b558cef3588676d391ff3661c6b34e56cef824cc58fcd5","observation_id":"9bf64f56-88f4-4597-b245-5a9ace04b8e4","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:59.292716Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:59.039584Z","title":"A., Evans, J","venue":null,"work_id":"f06646e2-027c-4a76-a165-5f3bdbbb22fb","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.14741","last_updated":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T17:28:37.211156Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","title":"Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity","version":1},"reference_index":60,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:53.888765Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.14741"},"observation_digest":"sha256:3bec956b358d01252a5128730328734d1bd05bed3292abd91982398f83a5b351","observation_id":"5791b3d2-29f6-4b99-baf7-4e45d30ebbd2","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:59.119553Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1810.04805","last_updated":"2019-05-24T20:37:26Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T18:16:28.847993Z","submitted_at":"2018-10-11T00:50:01Z","title":"BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"1810.04805","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:53.993172Z","title":"Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.14741","last_updated":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T17:28:37.211156Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","title":"Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity","version":1},"reference_index":61,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:53.993172Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/1810.04805","citing_paper":"/paper/2507.14741"},"observation_digest":"sha256:09f5d87499d4ef5fd10096dda7e4e065c3b9bd9964a962b557e175e5d742520a","observation_id":"9de9041d-236c-4e06-aacc-a95181ceac4e","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:53.993172Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:58.895824Z","title":"Nature communications: Writing your report (2024)","venue":null,"work_id":"39f309c2-5aec-426b-9f3a-90f766720a21","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.14741","last_updated":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T17:28:37.211156Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","title":"Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity","version":1},"reference_index":62,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:54.145883Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.14741"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c33fe09b9d32f38ba75ed5b35df829995741eca13dcb51046b86e09b04fe57b6","observation_id":"5da7e027-9d91-45be-a32c-4722454b5ba6","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:58.954390Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:58.746232Z","title":"manuscript appreciation","venue":null,"work_id":"4559fc7d-641d-4502-991b-397b0065d5a6","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.14741","last_updated":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T17:28:37.211156Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","title":"Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity","version":1},"reference_index":63,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:54.317145Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.14741"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b8d609915053e75f81f8c54f89be4a8bda0654f063c50a74f9c6776dd0d36861","observation_id":"3c899c92-2675-4023-925d-309f52edb5f4","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:58.820457Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:58.620452Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"a4b2ba48-4282-4fde-8266-d6d1a8c89e4d","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.14741","last_updated":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T17:28:37.211156Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","title":"Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity","version":1},"reference_index":64,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:54.464868Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.14741"},"observation_digest":"sha256:fd4e0d0d3d812f184d758764e86b36aa4534be32094e9cc80791b3f5f01d9fb0","observation_id":"24989ace-3ef5-480d-b271-76efb2bd2ede","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:58.678536Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:58.474667Z","title":"Contextual-Summarizing","venue":null,"work_id":"89d53a67-dcb4-4f6b-a581-d9d440a0a6bf","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.14741","last_updated":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T17:28:37.211156Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","title":"Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity","version":1},"reference_index":65,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:54.622933Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.14741"},"observation_digest":"sha256:4c7ec201d561efa301971f225ff3961a458d60e8e6d0ba8024cc8142d2a5efc8","observation_id":"d5bcbf13-80d5-4501-91dc-c9fcb7f00569","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:58.541308Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:58.346520Z","title":"Handle Sarcasm Carefully: If a sentence contains sarcasm, do not classify it based on its literal meaning","venue":null,"work_id":"0ffe6bb4-fa00-4c45-a7d5-eaf69f524872","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.14741","last_updated":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T17:28:37.211156Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","title":"Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity","version":1},"reference_index":66,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:54.725945Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.14741"},"observation_digest":"sha256:3fa9192b04ade295f6e762df11c00c8b691f14207432689c43176011841ba75c","observation_id":"cb16df26-530e-4506-a11a-c3119d115357","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:58.390556Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:58.199587Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"8919303a-d65b-497c-b352-47ce14f6070a","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.14741","last_updated":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T17:28:37.211156Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","title":"Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity","version":1},"reference_index":67,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:54.837826Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.14741"},"observation_digest":"sha256:23d9234a6eb05aac7385ff1ec91c5516edbb7264cbc1660e44e3612df8bebb3d","observation_id":"c3903ddc-c908-40bd-b73c-83c7c2be6b67","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:58.273275Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:58.062580Z","title":"If two tones are equally present, list both, separated by a semicolon","venue":null,"work_id":"179fda46-5d1b-4360-90d6-69f550fb6d82","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.14741","last_updated":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T17:28:37.211156Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","title":"Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity","version":1},"reference_index":68,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:54.924787Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.14741"},"observation_digest":"sha256:61e13484fcac505f57deadf322ee4d0310a3522d0b32d7f0d60c0b2f4f25600f","observation_id":"87b44018-84ae-4a26-b23a-8cfb406ade9e","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:58.109297Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:57.935617Z","title":"Sincerely, Dr. Smith","venue":null,"work_id":"68551e6c-1c2e-40f2-999f-b51dccd9e1d9","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.14741","last_updated":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T17:28:37.211156Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","title":"Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity","version":1},"reference_index":69,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:54.996104Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.14741"},"observation_digest":"sha256:ff0f30099bfaff11af0f1aeca46e9339d9d84be32520c655c8e3bee4d0817ba4","observation_id":"067866a9-18c1-4a89-9774-715a35d01d4a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:58.000727Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:57.814257Z","title":"Contextual-Summarizing","venue":null,"work_id":"6d60e163-11b9-4302-8f1e-0eb3adcb7f60","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.14741","last_updated":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T17:28:37.211156Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","title":"Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity","version":1},"reference_index":70,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:55.047783Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.14741"},"observation_digest":"sha256:56cf4dfa058c8d95d38c78c1c8db78d6fc62de26224412ec17ec40cd3b1e7190","observation_id":"6cad6488-af60-4dfa-a31b-8ed7a4becd80","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:57.877410Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:57.654597Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"9f144feb-d3c3-4471-8240-5ad4a6d62b4c","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.14741","last_updated":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T17:28:37.211156Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","title":"Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity","version":1},"reference_index":71,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:55.173694Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.14741"},"observation_digest":"sha256:784f9bd8740204fb3e93a605c93573e4456a92816705f8e749b8b9119c0784ca","observation_id":"3a3487a4-bce3-4e48-b5e6-7034af2e54b0","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:57.716405Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:57.522445Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"00164815-eb5a-49a7-8e02-e272f6576e10","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.14741","last_updated":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T17:28:37.211156Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","title":"Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity","version":1},"reference_index":72,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:55.398859Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.14741"},"observation_digest":"sha256:9c3dfa2e89585e1f5139747e685e42ccd4e0dd91e9cae95db0353240e9d84b5a","observation_id":"2ad14b76-5f13-4d15-bbb3-3260b23645b8","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:57.576124Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:57.269182Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"38ca8b25-df87-44ce-98a9-c7789c7411f0","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.14741","last_updated":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T17:28:37.211156Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","title":"Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity","version":1},"reference_index":73,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:55.496721Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.14741"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a622ce4502219366fcb880ee3c6ffa5e2f4da876c50a576c072bdfc8d0456ce3","observation_id":"850a5951-9302-4a7d-93ea-dbae9a2e2062","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:57.372836Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:57.068400Z","title":"sentence 1","venue":null,"work_id":"e966fe37-6609-4401-89e7-33985f50486b","year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.14741","last_updated":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T17:28:37.211156Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","title":"Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity","version":1},"reference_index":74,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:55.555139Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.14741"},"observation_digest":"sha256:daa6e5960de877d282150aa3854cc51ad026a3ba7c501c9453264d1944252d2f","observation_id":"bf34c640-bcc8-4e11-8705-3afc43bc57c2","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:57.172954Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:56.903501Z","title":"(1) and constant in eq","venue":null,"work_id":"c9a22fac-3414-4178-a2c3-df8713d91b63","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.14741","last_updated":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T17:28:37.211156Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","title":"Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity","version":1},"reference_index":75,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:55.620610Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.14741"},"observation_digest":"sha256:306c447f76056094f68d8c4ccf37e02ff42700e0bca7cac3de152309804dddd1","observation_id":"6bc4c8dc-8471-4e38-9c0c-b93b87aba2c7","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:56.968639Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:56.733632Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"f2ddc783-02ba-44f0-a779-cef3a9ca8e3e","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.14741","last_updated":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T17:28:37.211156Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","title":"Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity","version":1},"reference_index":76,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:55.699008Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.14741"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e209c08788b25b135a53ea4912a2121061f5f50e7fd8b5d9b478a45268745a96","observation_id":"af861dab-2e2b-498c-9196-d141e956342c","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:56.821005Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:56.530595Z","title":"the question is, if the absorption of a certain tissue is not that small at 800nm, does the method still work? if not, how to solve this problem?","venue":null,"work_id":"e8e0218f-a4a7-4eec-bf3b-5cf6a0446d32","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.14741","last_updated":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T17:28:37.211156Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","title":"Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity","version":1},"reference_index":77,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:55.755681Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.14741"},"observation_digest":"sha256:22485a6d81018e8bcc4d3089d2e0ba44c5b23e2d411dd5b982bb4d1932a8b67b","observation_id":"405eaa38-87c9-40a4-bb1f-2933502bfc45","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:56.661754Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:56.397371Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"93fc9981-8d67-4e4e-a554-97e23d33f4d0","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.14741","last_updated":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T17:28:37.211156Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","title":"Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity","version":1},"reference_index":78,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:55.802789Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.14741"},"observation_digest":"sha256:3f3bba70ae285a5edb01982108bb1ad3433b4dfef7a5ab6061ce8f7f266599f1","observation_id":"02b86b26-61b1-4974-b7e6-0a6c63ed54f6","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:56.450697Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:56.171763Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"c2df9dda-3f3e-4315-a699-6e62a9fa64d0","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.14741","last_updated":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T17:28:37.211156Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","title":"Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity","version":1},"reference_index":79,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:55.966146Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.14741"},"observation_digest":"sha256:279faafcae9870546348d0052c95b85d4fb57ca0f49c2a295fa9dadf951c2d68","observation_id":"02191706-c0a1-4a57-8d86-eab9c3bf2f25","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:53:56.276078Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}}],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.14741","last_updated":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","latest_version":1,"primary_category":"cs.CL","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T17:28:37.211156Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-19T20:19:21Z","title":"Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":79,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":33,"verified_exact":0,"verified_fuzzy":46},"total_outbound_references":79},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 14 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 79 of 79 outbound references and 1 inbound Pith citation observation for arXiv:2507.14741."}