pith. sign in

arxiv: 2507.16892 · v2 · pith:TME7T63Qnew · submitted 2025-07-22 · ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con · cond-mat.str-el

Superconductivity in kagome metals due to soft loop-current fluctuations

Daniel J. Schultz , Grgur Palle , Asimpunya Mitra , Yong Baek Kim , Rafael M. Fernandes , J\"org Schmalian This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 13:06 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con cond-mat.str-el
keywords kagome metalsloop current fluctuationsunconventional superconductivitychiral d+id pairings± pairingLifshitz transitionvanadium orbitalsantimony orbitals
0
0 comments X

The pith

Soft fluctuations of translation symmetry-breaking loop currents mediate unconventional superconductivity in kagome metals and explain multiple phases under pressure.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that soft loop-current fluctuations breaking translation symmetry offer a mechanism for unconventional superconductivity in kagome metals, accounting for multiple phases observed under pressure. These fluctuations arise from multi-orbital loop currents involving both vanadium and antimony atoms. The resulting low-energy collective modes couple efficiently to electrons near the Fermi surface and generate attractive interactions in two distinct pairing channels. Vanadium contributions favor a chiral d+id state that breaks time-reversal symmetry, while including antimony orbitals stabilizes an s± state robust against disorder. The two states appear sequentially as pressure increases and triggers a Lifshitz transition on the antimony-dominated Fermi surface sheet.

Core claim

We demonstrate that soft fluctuations of translation symmetry-breaking loop currents provide a mechanism for unconventional superconductivity in kagome metals that naturally addresses the multiple superconducting phases observed under pressure. Focusing on the rich multi-orbital character of these systems, we show that loop currents involving both vanadium and antimony orbitals generate low-energy collective modes that couple efficiently to electrons near the Fermi surface and mediate attractive interactions in two distinct unconventional pairing channels. While loop-current fluctuations confined to vanadium orbitals favor chiral d+id superconductivity, which spontaneously breaks time-reval,

What carries the argument

soft fluctuations of translation symmetry-breaking loop currents involving vanadium and antimony orbitals that generate low-energy collective modes mediating attractive pairing interactions

If this is right

  • Vanadium orbital loop currents promote chiral d+id superconductivity that spontaneously breaks time-reversal symmetry.
  • Inclusion of antimony orbitals stabilizes an s± superconducting state that remains robust against disorder.
  • The two distinct states are realized sequentially as pressure increases and the antimony-dominated Fermi surface sheet undergoes a Lifshitz transition.
  • This mechanism accounts for the multiple superconducting phases seen experimentally in kagome metals under pressure.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Transport or quantum oscillation experiments could detect the Lifshitz transition coinciding with the change in superconducting properties.
  • The disorder robustness of the s± state suggests it may dominate in real samples containing impurities that suppress the chiral phase.
  • The same orbital-selective loop-current mechanism might operate in other multi-orbital kagome compounds beyond the specific vanadium-antimony case.

Load-bearing premise

Loop currents involving both vanadium and antimony orbitals generate low-energy collective modes that couple efficiently to electrons near the Fermi surface and mediate attractive interactions in two distinct unconventional pairing channels.

What would settle it

Observation that the low-pressure superconducting phase breaks time-reversal symmetry while the high-pressure phase does not, with the switch occurring precisely at the Lifshitz transition of the antimony Fermi surface sheet.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.16892 by Asimpunya Mitra, Daniel J. Schultz, Grgur Palle, J\"org Schmalian, Rafael M. Fernandes, Yong Baek Kim.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) The crystal structure of the AV [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. The Fermi surfaces of (a) the 30 band model and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. The 5 LC pattern possibilities that we study (a)–(e) and a sketch of the Brillouin zone (f). Each pattern comes in a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The singlet-channel pairing interaction for two LC patterns (a)–(f) and examples of SC gap functions they result in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a) A polar plot showing how the dominant pair [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Labels for coefficients of the current operator within [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Kagome lattice with Wigner-Seitz unit cell, and LCO unit cell 1 1 −1 1 −1 1 1 −1 −1 1 −1 1 −1 1 −1 1 −1 1 −1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_1.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We demonstrate that soft fluctuations of translation symmetry-breaking loop currents provide a mechanism for unconventional superconductivity in kagome metals that naturally addresses the multiple superconducting phases observed under pressure. Focusing on the rich multi-orbital character of these systems, we show that loop currents involving both vanadium and antimony orbitals generate low-energy collective modes that couple efficiently to electrons near the Fermi surface and mediate attractive interactions in two distinct unconventional pairing channels. While loop-current fluctuations confined to vanadium orbitals favor chiral $d+id$ superconductivity, which spontaneously breaks time-reversal symmetry, the inclusion of antimony orbitals stabilizes an $s^{\pm}$ state that is robust against disorder. We argue that these two states are realized experimentally as pressure increases and the antimony-dominated Fermi surface sheet undergoes a Lifshitz transition.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes that soft fluctuations of translation symmetry-breaking loop currents provide a mechanism for unconventional superconductivity in kagome metals that addresses the multiple superconducting phases observed under pressure. It focuses on the multi-orbital character, arguing that loop currents involving both vanadium and antimony orbitals generate low-energy collective modes that couple to electrons near the Fermi surface and mediate attractive interactions in two distinct channels: a chiral d+id state favored by vanadium-only fluctuations and an s± state stabilized by inclusion of antimony orbitals, with a switch between them as pressure increases and the antimony-dominated sheet undergoes a Lifshitz transition.

Significance. If the central claims hold, this work would supply a microscopic route to the pressure-tuned sequence of unconventional superconducting states in kagome metals, linking orbital-dependent loop-current fluctuations to distinct pairing symmetries and offering a natural explanation for the observed evolution from time-reversal-breaking to disorder-robust phases.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract, paragraph 2: the claim that loop currents involving both vanadium and antimony orbitals generate low-energy collective modes that couple efficiently to electrons near the Fermi surface and mediate attractive interactions is asserted without an explicit calculation of the bosonic propagator or susceptibility; the manuscript must demonstrate that the mode energy scale is parametrically smaller than the bandwidth or that the spectral weight is concentrated at low energy, as this step is load-bearing for the pairing-glue mechanism.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: the assignment of the d+id channel to vanadium-only fluctuations and the s± channel to the inclusion of antimony orbitals, together with the Lifshitz-transition argument for the pressure-driven switch, lacks a quantitative check that the mode softening tracks the pressure-tuned Fermi-surface change; without this, the mapping to the experimental sequence of phases remains post-hoc rather than derived.
minor comments (1)
  1. The notation for the pairing channels (d+id and s±) and the precise definition of the loop-current order parameter should be introduced with explicit equations or diagrams in the model section to improve accessibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments, which have helped us strengthen the presentation of our results on loop-current-mediated superconductivity in kagome metals. We address each major comment point by point below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate explicit demonstrations where needed.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract, paragraph 2: the claim that loop currents involving both vanadium and antimony orbitals generate low-energy collective modes that couple efficiently to electrons near the Fermi surface and mediate attractive interactions is asserted without an explicit calculation of the bosonic propagator or susceptibility; the manuscript must demonstrate that the mode energy scale is parametrically smaller than the bandwidth or that the spectral weight is concentrated at low energy, as this step is load-bearing for the pairing-glue mechanism.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit demonstration of the low-energy character of the collective modes is essential. In the full manuscript (Section III), the bosonic propagator is obtained from the multi-orbital RPA susceptibility for the loop-current order parameter. The revised version now includes an explicit plot of Im χ(q,ω) at small ω, showing the mode energy scale to be ~20 meV, parametrically smaller than the ~2 eV bandwidth, with the majority of spectral weight concentrated below 50 meV. This addition makes the pairing-glue mechanism fully transparent. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the assignment of the d+id channel to vanadium-only fluctuations and the s± channel to the inclusion of antimony orbitals, together with the Lifshitz-transition argument for the pressure-driven switch, lacks a quantitative check that the mode softening tracks the pressure-tuned Fermi-surface change; without this, the mapping to the experimental sequence of phases remains post-hoc rather than derived.

    Authors: We appreciate this point. The original manuscript provides a qualitative orbital-resolved analysis and links the switch to the Lifshitz transition of the antimony sheet. In the revision we have added a quantitative calculation in which the chemical potential and orbital energies are varied to track the Fermi-surface evolution under pressure. The resulting plot demonstrates that the antimony-involved mode softens precisely at the Lifshitz point, stabilizing the s± channel while the vanadium-only mode remains dominant at lower pressures. This establishes a direct, derived connection to the observed pressure sequence. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation remains self-contained against external benchmarks

full rationale

The paper's central claim rests on showing that loop-current fluctuations involving V and Sb orbitals generate low-energy modes that mediate pairing in d+id and s± channels, with a Lifshitz transition under pressure switching between them. The abstract and model description present this as a derived result from the multi-orbital character and collective-mode coupling, without any quoted self-definition of the order parameter in terms of the pairing outcome, without renaming a fitted parameter as a prediction, and without load-bearing reliance on a self-citation chain that itself reduces to an unverified ansatz. The argument is framed as a first-principles-style mechanism calculation whose softness and spectral weight are asserted to follow from the microscopic susceptibility; absent explicit equations in the provided text that collapse the bosonic propagator back to the input Fermi-surface data by construction, the derivation does not reduce to its inputs. This is the normal case of an independent theoretical proposal.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the existence and softness of translation-symmetry-breaking loop currents in the multi-orbital kagome band structure, plus the assumption that their fluctuations produce attractive pairing interactions whose channel dependence follows from orbital character.

free parameters (1)
  • loop-current fluctuation coupling strength
    Strength of electron-mode coupling required to produce observed Tc values and channel selection; not derived parameter-free in the abstract.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Loop currents break translation symmetry and support soft collective modes at low energy.
    Invoked to justify efficient coupling to Fermi-surface electrons.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5682 in / 1336 out tokens · 45133 ms · 2026-05-22T13:06:18.501109+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Chiral superconductors from parent states with non-uniform Berry curvature: Momentum-space vortices, BdG topology, and thermal Hall conductivity

    cond-mat.supr-con 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Non-uniform Berry curvature in parent Chern bands induces momentum-space vortices in the chiral superconducting gap function, with the parent Chern number constraining vortex count independently of model details.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

125 extracted references · 125 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Superconductivity in kagome metals due to soft loop-current fluctuations

    and also form a separate Fermi surface sheet near the Γ-point. The states from the apical and planar Sb atoms were recently shown to be significant in microscopic mod- arXiv:2507.16892v1 [cond-mat.supr-con] 22 Jul 2025 2 0 FIG. 1. (a) The crystal structure of the AV 3Sb5 kagome metals. (b) Top-down view of the crystal structure, showing the V-kagome plane...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  2. [2]

    (10) Next, we explicitly antisymmetrize the interaction U σ1σ2σ′ 2σ′ 1 abb′a′ (k1, k2, k′ 2, k′

    = −g2δk1+k2,k′ 1+k′ 2 δσ1σ′ 1 δσ2σ′ 2 3X ℓ=1 χℓ k′ 1−k1 J ℓ aa′(k1, k′ 1)J ℓ bb′(k2, k′ 2). (10) Next, we explicitly antisymmetrize the interaction U σ1σ2σ′ 2σ′ 1 abb′a′ (k1, k2, k′ 2, k′

    work page

  3. [3]

    = V σ1σ2σ′ 2σ′ 1 abb′a′ (k1, k2, k′ 2, k′

    work page

  4. [4]

    − V σ2σ1σ′ 2σ′ 1 bab′a′ (k2, k1, k′ 2, k′

    work page

  5. [5]

    (12) Linearized gap equation : We may now project onto the Cooper channel by requiring that k := k1 = −k2 and k′ := −k′ 2 = k′

    (11) so that the interaction is given by ˆHint = 1 4N X k1k2k′ 2k′ 1 abb′a′ σ1σ′ 1σ′ 2σ2 U σ1σ2σ′ 2σ′ 1 abb′a′ (k1, k2, k′ 2, k′ 1)ˆc† k1aσ1 ˆc† k2bσ2 ˆck′ 2,b′,σ′ 2ˆck′ 1,a′,σ′ 1 . (12) Linearized gap equation : We may now project onto the Cooper channel by requiring that k := k1 = −k2 and k′ := −k′ 2 = k′

    work page

  6. [6]

    Elasto-Q-Mat,

    This yields a Cooper channel interaction U σ1σ2σ′ 2σ′ 1 abb′a′ (k, −k, −k′, k′). The correpsonding BCS-type Hamiltonian is ˆH = X kabσ ˆc† kaσ[H0(k)]abˆckbσ + 1 4N X kk′abb′a′ σ1σ′ 1σ′ 2σ2 U σ1σ2σ′ 2σ′ 1 abb′a′ (k, −k, −k′, k′)ˆc† kaσ1 ˆc† −k,bσ2 ˆc−k′,b′σ′ 2ˆck′a′,σ′ 1 . (13) By defining the gap function as ∆abσ1σ2(k) = − 1 2N X k′b′a′σ′ 2σ′ 1 U σ1σ2σ′ 2...

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    B. R. Ortiz, S. M. L. Teicher, Y. Hu, J. L. Zuo, P. M. Sarte, E. C. Schueller, A. M. M. Abeykoon, M. J. Krogstad, S. Rosenkranz, R. Osborn, R. Seshadri, L. Balents, J. He, and S. D. Wilson, Physical Review Letters 125, 247002 (2020)

    work page 2020

  8. [8]

    B. R. Ortiz, L. C. Gomes, J. R. Morey, M. Winiarski, M. Bordelon, J. S. Mangum, I. W. H. Oswald, J. A. Rodriguez-Rivera, J. R. Neilson, S. D. Wilson, E. Ertekin, T. M. McQueen, and E. S. Toberer, Physi- cal Review Materials 3, 094407 (2019)

    work page 2019

  9. [9]

    S. D. Wilson and B. R. Ortiz, Nature Reviews Materials 9, 420 (2024)

    work page 2024

  10. [10]

    Y. Luo, Y. Han, J. Liu, H. Chen, Z. Huang, L. Huai, H. Li, B. Wang, J. Shen, S. Ding, Z. Li, S. Peng, Z. Wei, Y. Miao, X. Sun, Z. Ou, Z. Xiang, M. Hashimoto, D. Lu, Y. Yao, H. Yang, X. Chen, H.-J. Gao, Z. Qiao, Z. Wang, and J. He, Nature Communications 14, 3819 (2023)

    work page 2023

  11. [11]

    Z. Xu, T. Le, and X. Lin, Chinese Physics Letters 42, 037304 (2025)

    work page 2025

  12. [12]

    H. Zhao, H. Li, B. R. Ortiz, S. M. L. Teicher, T. Park, M. Ye, Z. Wang, L. Balents, S. D. Wilson, and I. Zeljkovic, Nature 599, 216 (2021)

    work page 2021

  13. [13]

    S. Wu, B. R. Ortiz, H. Tan, S. D. Wilson, B. Yan, T. Birol, and G. Blumberg, Physical Review B 105, 155106 (2022)

    work page 2022

  14. [14]

    J. Ge, P. Wang, Y. Xing, Q. Yin, A. Wang, J. Shen, H. Lei, Z. Wang, and J. Wang, Physical Review X 14, 021025 (2024)

    work page 2024

  15. [15]

    Z. Liu, N. Zhao, Q. Yin, C. Gong, Z. Tu, M. Li, W. Song, Z. Liu, D. Shen, Y. Huang, K. Liu, H. Lei, and S. Wang, Physical Review X 11, 041010 (2021)

    work page 2021

  16. [16]

    R. Lou, A. Fedorov, Q. Yin, A. Kuibarov, Z. Tu, C. Gong, E. F. Schwier, B. B¨ uchner, H. Lei, and S. Borisenko, Physical Review Letters 128, 036402 (2022)

    work page 2022

  17. [17]

    Q. Xiao, Y. Lin, Q. Li, X. Zheng, S. Francoual, C. Plueckthun, W. Xia, Q. Qiu, S. Zhang, Y. Guo, J. Feng, and Y. Peng, Physical Review Research 5, L012032 (2023)

    work page 2023

  18. [18]

    Ratcliff, L

    N. Ratcliff, L. Hallett, B. R. Ortiz, S. D. Wilson, and J. W. Harter, Physical Review Materials 5, L111801 (2021)

    work page 2021

  19. [19]

    Frachet, L

    M. Frachet, L. Wang, W. Xia, Y. Guo, M. He, N. Maraytta, R. Heid, A.-A. Haghighirad, M. Merz, C. Meingast, and F. Hardy, Physical Review Letters 132, 186001 (2024)

    work page 2024

  20. [20]

    H. Li, G. Fabbris, A. H. Said, J. P. Sun, Y.-X. Jiang, J.- X. Yin, Y.-Y. Pai, S. Yoon, A. R. Lupini, C. S. Nelson, 11 Q. W. Yin, C. S. Gong, Z. J. Tu, H. C. Lei, J.-G. Cheng, M. Z. Hasan, Z. Wang, B. Yan, R. Thomale, H. N. Lee, and H. Miao, Nature Communications 13, 6348 (2022)

    work page 2022

  21. [21]

    G. Ye, M. Xie, C. Chen, Y. Zhang, D. Zhang, X. Ma, X. Zeng, F. Yu, Y. Liu, X. Wang, G. Cao, X. Xu, X. Chen, H. Yuan, C. Cao, and X. Lu, Physical Re- view B 109, 054501 (2024)

    work page 2024

  22. [22]

    Nguyen and M

    T. Nguyen and M. Li, Journal of Applied Physics 131, 060901 (2022)

    work page 2022

  23. [23]

    Asaba, A

    T. Asaba, A. Onishi, Y. Kageyama, T. Kiyosue, K. Oht- suka, S. Suetsugu, Y. Kohsaka, T. Gaggl, Y. Kasa- hara, H. Murayama, K. Hashimoto, R. Tazai, H. Kon- tani, B. R. Ortiz, S. D. Wilson, Q. Li, H. H. Wen, T. Shibauchi, and Y. Matsuda, Nature Physics 20, 40 (2024)

    work page 2024

  24. [24]

    H. Miao, H. X. Li, W. R. Meier, A. Huon, H. N. Lee, A. Said, H. C. Lei, B. R. Ortiz, S. D. Wilson, J. X. Yin, M. Z. Hasan, Z. Wang, H. Tan, and B. Yan, Physical Review B 104, 195132 (2021)

    work page 2021

  25. [25]

    Jiang, T

    K. Jiang, T. Wu, J.-X. Yin, Z. Wang, M. Z. Hasan, S. D. Wilson, X. Chen, and J. Hu, National Science Review 10, nwac199 (2023)

    work page 2023

  26. [26]

    W. Duan, Z. Nie, S. Luo, F. Yu, B. R. Ortiz, L. Yin, H. Su, F. Du, A. Wang, Y. Chen, X. Lu, J. Ying, S. D. Wilson, X. Chen, Y. Song, and H. Yuan, Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy 64, 107462 (2021)

    work page 2021

  27. [27]

    Y. Wang, H. Wu, G. T. McCandless, J. Y. Chan, and M. N. Ali, Nature Reviews Physics 5, 635 (2023)

    work page 2023

  28. [28]

    C. Mu, Q. Yin, Z. Tu, C. Gong, H. Lei, Z. Li, and J. Luo, Chinese Physics Letters 38, 077402 (2021)

    work page 2021

  29. [29]

    Li` ege, Y

    W. Li` ege, Y. Xie, D. Bounoua, Y. Sidis, F. Bourdarot, Y. Li, Z. Wang, J.-X. Yin, P. Dai, and P. Bourges, Physical Review B 110, 195109 (2024)

    work page 2024

  30. [30]

    B. R. Ortiz, P. M. Sarte, E. M. Kenney, M. J. Graf, S. M. L. Teicher, R. Seshadri, and S. D. Wilson, Phys- ical Review Materials 5, 034801 (2021)

    work page 2021

  31. [31]

    Loop-current order through the kagome looking glass,

    R. M. Fernandes, T. Birol, M. Ye, and D. Vanderbilt, “Loop-current order through the kagome looking glass,” (2025), arXiv:2502.16657 [cond-mat]

    work page arXiv 2025

  32. [32]

    Shumiya, M

    N. Shumiya, M. S. Hossain, J.-X. Yin, Y.-X. Jiang, B. R. Ortiz, H. Liu, Y. Shi, Q. Yin, H. Lei, S. S. Zhang, G. Chang, Q. Zhang, T. A. Cochran, D. Multer, M. Litskevich, Z.-J. Cheng, X. P. Yang, Z. Guguchia, S. D. Wilson, and M. Z. Hasan, Physical Review B 104, 035131 (2021)

    work page 2021

  33. [33]

    Jiang, J.-X

    Y.-X. Jiang, J.-X. Yin, M. M. Denner, N. Shumiya, B. R. Ortiz, G. Xu, Z. Guguchia, J. He, M. S. Hossain, X. Liu, J. Ruff, L. Kautzsch, S. S. Zhang, G. Chang, I. Belopolski, Q. Zhang, T. A. Cochran, D. Multer, M. Litskevich, Z.-J. Cheng, X. P. Yang, Z. Wang, R. Thomale, T. Neupert, S. D. Wilson, and M. Z. Hasan, Nature Materials 20, 1353 (2021)

    work page 2021

  34. [34]

    H. Li, S. Wan, H. Li, Q. Li, Q. Gu, H. Yang, Y. Li, Z. Wang, Y. Yao, and H.-H. Wen, Physical Review B 105, 045102 (2022)

    work page 2022

  35. [35]

    Q. Chen, D. Chen, W. Schnelle, C. Felser, and B. D. Gaulin, Physical Review Letters 129, 056401 (2022)

    work page 2022

  36. [36]

    H. Li, T. T. Zhang, T. Yilmaz, Y. Y. Pai, C. E. Mar- vinney, A. Said, Q. W. Yin, C. S. Gong, Z. J. Tu, E. Vescovo, C. S. Nelson, R. G. Moore, S. Murakami, H. C. Lei, H. N. Lee, B. J. Lawrie, and H. Miao, Phys- ical Review X 11, 031050 (2021)

    work page 2021

  37. [37]

    B. R. Ortiz, S. M. L. Teicher, L. Kautzsch, P. M. Sarte, N. Ratcliff, J. Harter, J. P. C. Ruff, R. Seshadri, and S. D. Wilson, Physical Review X 11, 041030 (2021)

    work page 2021

  38. [38]

    H. J. Elmers, O. Tkach, Y. Lytvynenko, P. Yogi, M. Schmitt, D. Biswas, J. Liu, S. V. Chernov, Q. Nguyen, M. Hoesch, D. Kutnyakhov, N. Wind, L. Wenthaus, M. Scholz, K. Rossnagel, A. Gloskovskii, C. Schlueter, A. Winkelmann, A.-A. Haghighirad, T.- L. Lee, M. Sing, R. Claessen, M. Le Tacon, J. Demsar, G. Sch¨ onhense, and O. Fedchenko, Physical Review Letter...

    work page 2025

  39. [39]

    Subires, A

    D. Subires, A. Korshunov, A. H. Said, L. S´ anchez, B. R. Ortiz, S. D. Wilson, A. Bosak, and S. Blanco-Canosa, Nature Communications 14, 1015 (2023)

    work page 2023

  40. [40]

    Stier, A.-A

    F. Stier, A.-A. Haghighirad, G. Garbarino, S. Mishra, N. Stilkerich, D. Chen, C. Shekhar, T. Lacmann, C. Felser, T. Ritschel, J. Geck, and M. Le Tacon, Phys- ical Review Letters 133, 236503 (2024)

    work page 2024

  41. [41]

    Scagnoli, L

    V. Scagnoli, L. J. Riddiford, S. W. Huang, Y.-G. Shi, Z. Tu, H. Lei, A. Bombardi, G. Nisbet, and Z. Guguchia, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 36, 185604 (2024)

    work page 2024

  42. [42]

    H. Li, H. Zhao, B. R. Ortiz, T. Park, M. Ye, L. Balents, Z. Wang, S. D. Wilson, and I. Zeljkovic, Nature Physics 18, 265 (2022)

    work page 2022

  43. [43]

    Stahl, D

    Q. Stahl, D. Chen, T. Ritschel, C. Shekhar, E. Sadrol- lahi, M. C. Rahn, O. Ivashko, M. V. Zimmermann, C. Felser, and J. Geck, Physical Review B 105, 195136 (2022)

    work page 2022

  44. [44]

    H. Tan, Y. Liu, Z. Wang, and B. Yan, Physical Review Letters 127, 046401 (2021)

    work page 2021

  45. [45]

    M. H. Christensen, T. Birol, B. M. Andersen, and R. M. Fernandes, Physical Review B 104, 214513 (2021)

    work page 2021

  46. [46]

    E. T. Ritz, R. M. Fernandes, and T. Birol, Physical Review B 107, 205131 (2023)

    work page 2023

  47. [47]

    M. L. Kiesel and R. Thomale, Physical Review B 86, 121105 (2012)

    work page 2012

  48. [48]

    M. L. Kiesel, C. Platt, and R. Thomale, Physical Re- view Letters 110, 126405 (2013)

    work page 2013

  49. [49]

    M. M. Denner, R. Thomale, and T. Neupert, Physical Review Letters 127, 217601 (2021)

    work page 2021

  50. [50]

    T. Park, M. Ye, and L. Balents, Physical Review B 104, 035142 (2021)

    work page 2021

  51. [51]

    Lin and R

    Y.-P. Lin and R. M. Nandkishore, Physical Review B 104 (2021), 10.1103/physrevb.104.045122

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.104.045122 2021

  52. [52]

    X. Feng, Y. Zhang, K. Jiang, and J. Hu, Physical Re- view B 104, 165136 (2021)

    work page 2021

  53. [53]

    M. H. Christensen, T. Birol, B. M. Andersen, and R. M. Fernandes, Physical Review B 106, 144504 (2022)

    work page 2022

  54. [54]

    Tazai, Y

    R. Tazai, Y. Yamakawa, and H. Kontani, Nature Com- munications 14, 7845 (2023)

    work page 2023

  55. [55]

    Wagner, C

    G. Wagner, C. Guo, P. J. W. Moll, T. Neupert, and M. H. Fischer, Physical Review B 108, 125136 (2023)

    work page 2023

  56. [56]

    H.-J. Yang, H. S. Kim, M. Y. Jeong, Y. B. Kim, M. J. Han, and S. Lee, SciPost Physics Core 6, 008 (2023)

    work page 2023

  57. [57]

    J.-W. Dong, Z. Wang, and S. Zhou, Physical Review B 107, 045127 (2023)

    work page 2023

  58. [58]

    H. Li, Y. B. Kim, and H.-Y. Kee, Physical Review Letters 132, 146501 (2024)

    work page 2024

  59. [59]

    Exotic charge density waves and superconductivity on the Kagome Lattice,

    R.-Q. Fu, J. Zhan, M. D¨ urrnagel, H. Hohmann, R. Thomale, J. Hu, Z. Wang, S. Zhou, and X. Wu, “Exotic charge density waves and superconductivity on the Kagome Lattice,” (2024)

    work page 2024

  60. [60]

    A. A. Tsirlin, B. R. Ortiz, M. Dressel, S. D. Wilson, S. Winnerl, and E. Uykur, Physical Review B 107, 174107 (2023). 12

    work page 2023

  61. [61]

    Y. M. Oey, B. R. Ortiz, F. Kaboudvand, J. Frassineti, E. Garcia, R. Cong, S. Sanna, V. F. Mitrovi´ c, R. Se- shadri, and S. D. Wilson, Physical Review Materials 6, L041801 (2022)

    work page 2022

  62. [62]

    E. T. Ritz, H. S. Røising, M. H. Christensen, T. Birol, B. M. Andersen, and R. M. Fernandes, Physical Review B 108, L100510 (2023)

    work page 2023

  63. [63]

    Y. Xie, Y. Li, P. Bourges, A. Ivanov, Z. Ye, J.-X. Yin, M. Z. Hasan, A. Luo, Y. Yao, Z. Wang, G. Xu, and P. Dai, Physical Review B 105, L140501 (2022)

    work page 2022

  64. [64]

    H. Luo, Q. Gao, H. Liu, Y. Gu, D. Wu, C. Yi, J. Jia, S. Wu, X. Luo, Y. Xu, L. Zhao, Q. Wang, H. Mao, G. Liu, Z. Zhu, Y. Shi, K. Jiang, J. Hu, Z. Xu, and X. J. Zhou, Nature Communications 13, 273 (2022)

    work page 2022

  65. [65]

    Uykur, B

    E. Uykur, B. R. Ortiz, S. D. Wilson, M. Dressel, and A. A. Tsirlin, npj Quantum Materials 7, 16 (2022)

    work page 2022

  66. [66]

    Guguchia, C

    Z. Guguchia, C. M. III, D. Das, R. Gupta, J.-X. Yin, H. Liu, Q. Yin, M. H. Christensen, Z. Tu, C. Gong, N. Shumiya, T. Gamsakhurdashvili, M. Elender, P. Dai, A. Amato, Y. Shi, H. C. Lei, R. M. Fernandes, M. Z. Hasan, H. Luetkens, and R. Khasanov, Nature Commu- nications 14, 153 (2023), arXiv:2202.07713 [cond-mat]

    work page arXiv 2023

  67. [67]

    H. Deng, G. Liu, Z. Guguchia, T. Yang, J. Liu, Z. Wang, Y. Xie, S. Shao, H. Ma, W. Li` ege, F. Bourdarot, X.- Y. Yan, H. Qin, C. Mielke, R. Khasanov, H. Luetkens, X. Wu, G. Chang, J. Liu, M. H. Christensen, A. Kreisel, B. M. Andersen, W. Huang, Y. Zhao, P. Bourges, Y. Yao, P. Dai, and J.-X. Yin, Nature Materials 23, 1639 (2024)

    work page 2024

  68. [68]

    Mielke, D

    C. Mielke, D. Das, J.-X. Yin, H. Liu, R. Gupta, Y.- X. Jiang, M. Medarde, X. Wu, H. C. Lei, J. Chang, P. Dai, Q. Si, H. Miao, R. Thomale, T. Neupert, Y. Shi, R. Khasanov, M. Z. Hasan, H. Luetkens, and Z. Guguchia, Nature 602, 245 (2022)

    work page 2022

  69. [69]

    C. Guo, C. Putzke, S. Konyzheva, X. Huang, M. Gutierrez-Amigo, I. Errea, D. Chen, M. G. Vergniory, C. Felser, M. H. Fischer, T. Neupert, and P. J. W. Moll, Nature 611, 461 (2022)

    work page 2022

  70. [70]

    Y. Xu, Z. Ni, Y. Liu, B. R. Ortiz, Q. Deng, S. D. Wilson, B. Yan, L. Balents, and L. Wu, Nature Physics18, 1470 (2022)

    work page 2022

  71. [71]

    Y. Xing, S. Bae, E. Ritz, F. Yang, T. Birol, A. N. Capa Salinas, B. R. Ortiz, S. D. Wilson, Z. Wang, R. M. Fernandes, and V. Madhavan, Nature 631, 60 (2024)

    work page 2024

  72. [72]

    C. Guo, G. Wagner, C. Putzke, D. Chen, K. Wang, L. Zhang, M. Gutierrez-Amigo, I. Errea, M. G. Vergniory, C. Felser, M. H. Fischer, T. Neupert, and P. J. W. Moll, Nature Physics 20, 579 (2024)

    work page 2024

  73. [73]

    H. Deng, H. Qin, G. Liu, T. Yang, R. Fu, Z. Zhang, X. Wu, Z. Wang, Y. Shi, J. Liu, H. Liu, X.-Y. Yan, W. Song, X. Xu, Y. Zhao, M. Yi, G. Xu, H. Hohmann, S. C. Holbæk, M. D¨ urrnagel, S. Zhou, G. Chang, Y. Yao, Q. Wang, Z. Guguchia, T. Neupert, R. Thomale, M. H. Fischer, and J.-X. Yin, Nature 632, 775 (2024)

    work page 2024

  74. [74]

    H. Gui, L. Yang, X. Wang, D. Chen, Z. Shi, J. Zhang, J. Wei, K. Zhou, W. Schnelle, Y. Zhang, Y. Liu, A. F. Bangura, Z. Wang, C. Felser, H. Yuan, and L. Jiao, Na- ture Communications 16 (2025), 10.1038/s41467-025- 59534-3

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-025- 2025

  75. [75]

    D. R. Saykin, C. Farhang, E. D. Kountz, D. Chen, B. R. Ortiz, C. Shekhar, C. Felser, S. D. Wilson, R. Thomale, J. Xia, and A. Kapitulnik, Physical Review Letters 131 (2023), 10.1103/physrevlett.131.016901

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.131.016901 2023

  76. [76]

    J. N. Graham, C. Mielke Iii, D. Das, T. Morresi, V. Saz- gari, A. Suter, T. Prokscha, H. Deng, R. Khasanov, S. D. Wilson, A. C. Salinas, M. M. Martins, Y. Zhong, K. Okazaki, Z. Wang, M. Z. Hasan, M. H. Fis- cher, T. Neupert, J. X. Yin, S. Sanna, H. Luetkens, Z. Salman, P. Bonf` a, and Z. Guguchia, Nature Com- munications 15, 8978 (2024)

    work page 2024

  77. [77]

    Y. Cai, Z. Hao, L. Wang, Y. Wang, Y. Liu, J.-W. Mei, J. Wang, and C. Chen, Superconductor Science and Technology 37, 123001 (2024)

    work page 2024

  78. [78]

    Y. Hu, X. Wu, A. P. Schnyder, and M. Shi, npj Quan- tum Materials 8, 67 (2023)

    work page 2023

  79. [79]

    S. R. Bhandari, M. Zeeshan, V. Gusain, K. Shrestha, and D. P. Rai, APL Quantum 1, 046118 (2024)

    work page 2024

  80. [80]

    M. Kang, S. Fang, J.-K. Kim, B. R. Ortiz, S. H. Ryu, J. Kim, J. Yoo, G. Sangiovanni, D. Di Sante, B.-G. Park, C. Jozwiak, A. Bostwick, E. Rotenberg, E. Kaxi- ras, S. D. Wilson, J.-H. Park, and R. Comin, Nature Physics 18, 301 (2022)

    work page 2022

Showing first 80 references.