{"as_of":"2026-08-06T21:32:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:861f4ab28107664bf7250920713220b4fd9ffce6bc184b22b8cdf74400ffb031","coverage":[{"denominator":17,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":17,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:56:32.104440Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":17,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":17,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T06:34:29.942622+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":0,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"cited_works","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2507.17360/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2507.17360/integrity","json":"/paper/2507.17360/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2507.17360"},"outbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:56:32.222458Z","title":"We specify the working model for ∆ 1c(sl1, j1) 43 as: ∆1c∗(sl1, j1) = s⊤ l1δ∗ j1, δ∗ j1 = arg min δ E{(Y 1c∗ j1 − Y 1c∗ jf 1 − S⊤ l1δ)2}","venue":null,"work_id":"84542e1b-3116-4335-8a52-783c7ead91be","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.17360","last_updated":"2025-07-23T09:45:39Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:47:40.119570Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-23T09:45:39Z","title":"Balancing utility and cost in dynamic treatment regimes","version":1},"reference_index":1,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:56:32.071857Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.17360"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a5c365a59200f3f6f6640f4e158025b97a24d07e2d9fb30add79d536ec0702eb","observation_id":"0925937e-d67a-4531-9f67-921fe4a6839e","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:56:32.225568Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-06T06:34:29.942622+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T06:34:29.942622+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T06:34:23.284952+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:56:32.263045Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"4f6ed3c0-a01f-490e-a709-3c0d5fc43f3f","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.17360","last_updated":"2025-07-23T09:45:39Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:47:40.119570Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-23T09:45:39Z","title":"Balancing utility and cost in dynamic treatment regimes","version":1},"reference_index":2,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:56:32.055659Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.17360"},"observation_digest":"sha256:d8fc978fbd985c365da05723dabecaf3aafc09ba6937c7410f952aafcbf66d0a","observation_id":"a82e1484-3af5-40d6-b01b-1b3594c69e8a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:56:32.265992Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-06T06:34:29.942622+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T06:34:29.942622+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T06:34:23.284952+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:56:32.255064Z","title":"Moreover, note that ¯Q2t∗{¯S2, A1, π2t∗(S¯jf 2 , j1, A1, jf 2)} = ¯Q2t∗(¯S2, A1, 0) + ¯∆2t∗(¯S2, A1)I{∆2t∗(S¯jf 2 , j1, A1, jf","venue":null,"work_id":"13e719b4-8dcf-48cd-bdf2-47943283c34b","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.17360","last_updated":"2025-07-23T09:45:39Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:47:40.119570Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-23T09:45:39Z","title":"Balancing utility and cost in dynamic treatment regimes","version":1},"reference_index":3,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:56:32.059527Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.17360"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e84419638243044046cd9f8c8148816b3003e093dbeeaa445330e9947f2e8c3a","observation_id":"addbe612-7734-4304-a596-448574bc23b9","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:56:32.257840Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-06T06:34:29.942622+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T06:34:29.942622+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T06:34:23.284952+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:56:32.247101Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"3c0ec862-119c-4d7c-b761-4fcb0b09d575","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.17360","last_updated":"2025-07-23T09:45:39Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:47:40.119570Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-23T09:45:39Z","title":"Balancing utility and cost in dynamic treatment regimes","version":1},"reference_index":4,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:56:32.062675Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.17360"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a4bb16c87915c2f02896665d4e2a6e5b4f1dd934221dbf57dc63c33e64274da0","observation_id":"d3fb1143-1e85-43b1-b0ea-07ab0e804aff","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:56:32.250006Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-06T06:34:29.942622+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T06:34:29.942622+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T06:34:23.284952+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:56:32.238853Z","title":"This motivates the definition of Y 1t∗ j1 = Y − C 2t(A2) + (¯S2, A1)⊤ ¯α∗{I(S⊤ ¯jf 2 α∗ j1A1jf 2 > 0) − A2} − C 2c(jf","venue":null,"work_id":"db5ee111-5b54-4eea-81a0-43e516c28f73","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.17360","last_updated":"2025-07-23T09:45:39Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:47:40.119570Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-23T09:45:39Z","title":"Balancing utility and cost in dynamic treatment regimes","version":1},"reference_index":5,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:56:32.065621Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.17360"},"observation_digest":"sha256:2c8a32405266973f11cf7d1b59ea1d757486a613d9d3a2174e9aa71e57c2f1c1","observation_id":"8ca2fe87-54cf-4721-851a-bb45850ff4dd","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:56:32.241745Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-06T06:34:29.942622+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T06:34:29.942622+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T06:34:23.284952+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:56:32.230742Z","title":"42 It follows that E(Y 1t∗ j1 − eY 1t∗ j1 | S1, A1) = 0","venue":null,"work_id":"9e03f590-82ee-4122-ab8c-99637ac65f64","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.17360","last_updated":"2025-07-23T09:45:39Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:47:40.119570Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-23T09:45:39Z","title":"Balancing utility and cost in dynamic treatment regimes","version":1},"reference_index":6,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:56:32.068522Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.17360"},"observation_digest":"sha256:47e8934cd8507b8ae8f4382d895542686ead09719b5f9b985b8282cece1e9fda","observation_id":"148ccead-bba1-4df3-8cac-6e59761befce","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:56:32.233624Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-06T06:34:29.942622+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T06:34:29.942622+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T06:34:23.284952+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:56:32.214235Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"84ba093c-8d87-4e36-95a8-ec0983c64f29","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.17360","last_updated":"2025-07-23T09:45:39Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:47:40.119570Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-23T09:45:39Z","title":"Balancing utility and cost in dynamic treatment regimes","version":1},"reference_index":7,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:56:32.075987Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.17360"},"observation_digest":"sha256:ac5c7722b3eb670add8d6cf3b695b46f653b3928cdeb04c1c2b48805eb53efb9","observation_id":"9566ea8f-ac64-4080-99fb-1f7901a52ed6","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:56:32.216971Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-06T06:34:29.942622+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T06:34:29.942622+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T06:34:23.284952+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:56:32.206229Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"b37bc2f5-c9af-4190-90b3-3f8dffa52610","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.17360","last_updated":"2025-07-23T09:45:39Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:47:40.119570Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-23T09:45:39Z","title":"Balancing utility and cost in dynamic treatment regimes","version":1},"reference_index":8,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:56:32.079552Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.17360"},"observation_digest":"sha256:9a3f8a21eddad6f28680080ce9cb2c8e36fb78c9ac6b4c087ae8f7ce236f3c77","observation_id":"ac33ac09-0906-4563-8e56-e644b39fa655","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:56:32.208944Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-06T06:34:29.942622+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T06:34:29.942622+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T06:34:23.284952+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:56:32.197584Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"6c5ef49f-aaf3-4c4c-9cf0-47d62aa1f1f3","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.17360","last_updated":"2025-07-23T09:45:39Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:47:40.119570Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-23T09:45:39Z","title":"Balancing utility and cost in dynamic treatment regimes","version":1},"reference_index":9,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:56:32.082497Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.17360"},"observation_digest":"sha256:cc6cef248b697d592d27080fb84f31c2adcb69fbdea3738ec93ecb0e142e29d6","observation_id":"41ead402-8ad3-4deb-af5a-582f9e9747b2","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:56:32.200812Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-06T06:34:29.942622+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T06:34:29.942622+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T06:34:23.284952+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:56:32.189626Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"a9a73476-9151-489f-9ef7-a94932f89c07","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.17360","last_updated":"2025-07-23T09:45:39Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:47:40.119570Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-23T09:45:39Z","title":"Balancing utility and cost in dynamic treatment regimes","version":1},"reference_index":10,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:56:32.085552Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.17360"},"observation_digest":"sha256:2f046ec8e46d1b910c616056b5f6864a2205bbd99ae129c792f7dceafe04f82f","observation_id":"4cb36102-3839-419c-9a03-ab2bb81c824d","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:56:32.192377Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-06T06:34:29.942622+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T06:34:29.942622+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T06:34:23.284952+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:56:32.181163Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"983ed6ac-0e25-4cf8-86cc-06191b97d7f7","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.17360","last_updated":"2025-07-23T09:45:39Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:47:40.119570Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-23T09:45:39Z","title":"Balancing utility and cost in dynamic treatment regimes","version":1},"reference_index":11,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:56:32.088131Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.17360"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a1ffe3527cd261bb0b438d78916b76ab8fbe294b95a295cfd8bf308521f67412","observation_id":"508f68bd-f174-4d50-81a1-b40d486a20d6","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:56:32.184271Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-06T06:34:29.942622+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T06:34:29.942622+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T06:34:23.284952+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:56:32.172141Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"46d3a23a-1358-47e4-ac5d-3c7136e70dfd","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.17360","last_updated":"2025-07-23T09:45:39Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:47:40.119570Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-23T09:45:39Z","title":"Balancing utility and cost in dynamic treatment regimes","version":1},"reference_index":12,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:56:32.091110Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.17360"},"observation_digest":"sha256:db3a70a6fbe5843e3fa615cc991272fb99c761a10fa3b9c13e7a7e9a503ed22b","observation_id":"76c546d8-1216-421a-9227-9a3d33824a5e","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:56:32.175175Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-06T06:34:29.942622+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T06:34:29.942622+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T06:34:23.284952+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:56:32.163494Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"5966e488-e285-4a96-8c63-f67f2ea53db4","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.17360","last_updated":"2025-07-23T09:45:39Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:47:40.119570Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-23T09:45:39Z","title":"Balancing utility and cost in dynamic treatment regimes","version":1},"reference_index":13,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:56:32.093979Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.17360"},"observation_digest":"sha256:993f422d9bb81286998338ce33c355dee81e09ae02b61d2a8a148ea25794e7e8","observation_id":"4edf3983-0d17-4c69-9723-18fd3e445914","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:56:32.166314Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-06T06:34:29.942622+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T06:34:29.942622+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T06:34:23.284952+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:56:32.155265Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"cc575b7f-cc97-457a-a4c9-7e319ce369a0","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.17360","last_updated":"2025-07-23T09:45:39Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:47:40.119570Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-23T09:45:39Z","title":"Balancing utility and cost in dynamic treatment regimes","version":1},"reference_index":14,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:56:32.096861Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.17360"},"observation_digest":"sha256:ddb5abadacaef534be4186638deb0d25c3a4657fd78e32424378ecfc8431f7cc","observation_id":"745d1321-5e18-464c-ad4b-4d29a737449e","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:56:32.158091Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-06T06:34:29.942622+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T06:34:29.942622+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T06:34:23.284952+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:56:32.146706Z","title":"Hence T5 = Op{(1/√n)r+1}","venue":null,"work_id":"d1a92f52-5a3d-4ca3-b185-2b8ea3a65197","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.17360","last_updated":"2025-07-23T09:45:39Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:47:40.119570Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-23T09:45:39Z","title":"Balancing utility and cost in dynamic treatment regimes","version":1},"reference_index":15,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:56:32.099413Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.17360"},"observation_digest":"sha256:9d79790f30285bd1c997a3b95125e1ca46479d715e5e6f42512e732a9873a9c1","observation_id":"a0eef08b-8401-4674-be30-c5794a1d0967","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:56:32.149687Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-06T06:34:29.942622+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T06:34:29.942622+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T06:34:23.284952+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:56:32.137755Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"1bd53a53-2116-461f-9a31-70dcb0e88298","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.17360","last_updated":"2025-07-23T09:45:39Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:47:40.119570Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-23T09:45:39Z","title":"Balancing utility and cost in dynamic treatment regimes","version":1},"reference_index":16,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:56:32.101911Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.17360"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e0f38d43df1a5ee76918d9273f672bc960e23cc4ad2243f4390a9d7cfb2d004d","observation_id":"d06447ff-de08-441a-91ce-e5a0e3af41a4","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:56:32.140633Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-06T06:34:29.942622+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T06:34:29.942622+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T06:34:23.284952+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:56:32.127582Z","title":"Consequently, ˆG2c = Op{(1/√n)r+1 + ϵn(1/√n)r + ϵr+1 n }","venue":null,"work_id":"95a73aa3-1bb6-4fe9-b264-d4a86aaa4fd8","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.17360","last_updated":"2025-07-23T09:45:39Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:47:40.119570Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-23T09:45:39Z","title":"Balancing utility and cost in dynamic treatment regimes","version":1},"reference_index":17,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:56:32.104440Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.17360"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e4417fdacb66b73979c7730a3fe98ee5581b51a64e2f54bd52a1d23f05f783b5","observation_id":"3b10bdfd-d4dd-4271-bc04-cf5cf3b8b7d9","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:56:32.131613Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-06T06:34:29.942622+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T06:34:29.942622+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T06:34:23.284952+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}}],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.17360","last_updated":"2025-07-23T09:45:39Z","latest_version":1,"primary_category":"stat.ME","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:47:40.119570Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-23T09:45:39Z","title":"Balancing utility and cost in dynamic treatment regimes"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":17,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":11,"verified_exact":0,"verified_fuzzy":6},"total_outbound_references":17},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T06:34:29.942622+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T06:34:23.284952+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 6 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 17 of 17 outbound references and 0 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2507.17360."}