{"as_of":"2026-08-08T17:55:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:e796ed0066f86d1e8cc1afda215eb5178b92bef5b14f56754afa21ff43306bd6","coverage":[{"denominator":33,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":33,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T11:34:33.532158Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":34,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":34,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":1,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-05-18T00:02:24.352947Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"arxiv_reference","source_observed_at":"2026-05-18T00:02:25.411935Z","state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.22580","last_updated":"2026-07-31T16:15:56Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T13:58:36.616554Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-30T11:21:09Z","title":"RePaCA: Leveraging Reasoning Large Language Models for Static Automated Patch Correctness Assessment","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2507.22580","doi":null,"metadata_source":"arxiv_reference","pith_arxiv_id":"2507.22580","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-03T01:25:40.786407Z","title":"Repaca: Leveraging reasoning large language models for static automated patch correctness assessment","venue":null,"work_id":"fccbe298-d811-4657-ba87-320f8650c121","year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2509.08827","last_updated":"2025-10-09T17:08:52Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:38:05.011922Z","submitted_at":"2025-09-10T17:59:43Z","title":"A Survey of Reinforcement Learning for Large Reasoning Models","version":3},"reference_index":150,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-05-18T00:02:24.352947Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2507.22580","citing_paper":"/paper/2509.08827"},"observation_digest":"sha256:530036f2dc411295b9271310bca199f36ef94735eaf27c04050fc06104ea578d","observation_id":"9603247a-b564-4e6a-b863-0a75b95859fe","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-03T01:25:40.786407Z","resolver_source":"arxiv_id","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}}],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2507.22580/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2507.22580/integrity","json":"/paper/2507.22580/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2507.22580"},"outbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T11:34:37.272160Z","title":"This approach ensures a direct and fair comparison against leading techniques like APPT and CA CHE, which use the same evaluation framework","venue":null,"work_id":"66af5b1f-7a4f-452d-b88d-d9662f0b262d","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.22580","last_updated":"2026-07-31T16:15:56Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T13:58:36.616554Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-30T11:21:09Z","title":"RePaCA: Leveraging Reasoning Large Language Models for Static Automated Patch Correctness Assessment","version":2},"reference_index":1,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T11:34:30.269045Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.22580"},"observation_digest":"sha256:656e4704f15f5a025b754700e2681fefb7364544731f4c6ede19cecd9eb0ea6c","observation_id":"0fd0d1b9-f4c8-4ee3-828c-714bf41e2f0c","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T11:34:37.470058Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T11:34:36.956347Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"ed61de4f-c436-44a9-b035-fbdffaa4428e","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.22580","last_updated":"2026-07-31T16:15:56Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T13:58:36.616554Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-30T11:21:09Z","title":"RePaCA: Leveraging Reasoning Large Language Models for Static Automated Patch Correctness Assessment","version":2},"reference_index":2,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T11:34:30.353452Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.22580"},"observation_digest":"sha256:9f3b350c47bf0c0c6375954fc6c14cd8dfabd7d57e8421fb2f866dcdcbc56c4d","observation_id":"d10f5620-c578-4032-a92a-ed7d9e96d221","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T11:34:37.111735Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T11:34:36.748604Z","title":"The patch also introduces a new variable `ydotonscale2` that is not used anywhere in the original code, which is not a good practice","venue":null,"work_id":"5864e308-e4bf-4183-bfba-ba22619e8edc","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.22580","last_updated":"2026-07-31T16:15:56Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T13:58:36.616554Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-30T11:21:09Z","title":"RePaCA: Leveraging Reasoning Large Language Models for Static Automated Patch Correctness Assessment","version":2},"reference_index":3,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T11:34:30.455920Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.22580"},"observation_digest":"sha256:8adad135246d1714730c7f1142014f9569dfe6290cbe8a772e27f41d6578695d","observation_id":"b344c3e2-6b4e-48f2-9282-80a0c0944c4d","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T11:34:36.849978Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2301.03270","last_updated":"2023-11-01T06:03:48Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T14:39:31.101396Z","submitted_at":"2023-01-09T11:08:15Z","title":"A Survey of Learning-based Automated Program Repair","version":3},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2301.03270","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2301.03270","metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"2301.03270","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T12:16:18.182151Z","title":"A Survey of Learning-based Automated Program Repair","venue":"cs.SE","work_id":"7e8e8ee0-5455-42d3-abf6-bd46cf95d4c9","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.22580","last_updated":"2026-07-31T16:15:56Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T13:58:36.616554Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-30T11:21:09Z","title":"RePaCA: Leveraging Reasoning Large Language Models for Static Automated Patch Correctness Assessment","version":2},"reference_index":4,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T11:34:30.561564Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2301.03270","citing_paper":"/paper/2507.22580"},"observation_digest":"sha256:cbf78e3be2ace5f4511b93116119515729261005f271fbd0e973c1da0cad66d8","observation_id":"c8056aef-1463-458c-9de7-ba2132d72d7e","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T11:34:34.687557Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T11:34:36.402631Z","title":"An analysis of patch plausibility and correctness for generate -and-validate patch generation systems,","venue":null,"work_id":"4621d46a-947d-406d-b1d9-6a1d31748895","year":2015},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.22580","last_updated":"2026-07-31T16:15:56Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T13:58:36.616554Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-30T11:21:09Z","title":"RePaCA: Leveraging Reasoning Large Language Models for Static Automated Patch Correctness Assessment","version":2},"reference_index":5,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T11:34:30.694420Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.22580"},"observation_digest":"sha256:47aa6c21e3101fd946bf11107e9dd0a0d00ab8db6dce37ac7e6e1004d911d2be","observation_id":"f4e4a80b-05d8-4ed3-a823-a3e2e3e71303","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T11:34:36.579171Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T11:34:31.231673Z","title":"EvoSuite: automatic test suite generation for object - oriented software,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2011},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.22580","last_updated":"2026-07-31T16:15:56Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T13:58:36.616554Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-30T11:21:09Z","title":"RePaCA: Leveraging Reasoning Large Language Models for Static Automated Patch Correctness Assessment","version":2},"reference_index":6,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T11:34:31.231673Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.22580"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b78449e9dca826d39aee705d78289b2df38f75b505c080f32b0563ce51279e11","observation_id":"8e7072a2-f1b7-4de6-a7d1-16eb639fbe4c","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T11:34:31.231673Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T11:34:30.937247Z","title":"Automated patch correctness assessment: how far are we?,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.22580","last_updated":"2026-07-31T16:15:56Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T13:58:36.616554Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-30T11:21:09Z","title":"RePaCA: Leveraging Reasoning Large Language Models for Static Automated Patch Correctness Assessment","version":2},"reference_index":7,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T11:34:30.937247Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.22580"},"observation_digest":"sha256:61661d396e41800ef696d40ffbb51159e2f4e9b42db3a422ea46aa047ccf88c2","observation_id":"a24464d3-c494-4421-ab24-f57063dd667e","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T11:34:30.937247Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T11:34:31.028535Z","title":"Is the cure worse than the disease? overfitting in automated program repair,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2015},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.22580","last_updated":"2026-07-31T16:15:56Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T13:58:36.616554Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-30T11:21:09Z","title":"RePaCA: Leveraging Reasoning Large Language Models for Static Automated Patch Correctness Assessment","version":2},"reference_index":8,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T11:34:31.028535Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.22580"},"observation_digest":"sha256:4b3c2e05756b3679b24d8f8360cac7d218ab9a1bf20a0144beb4e1fedd61de62","observation_id":"71ea3e49-97d0-4ad2-b256-5c9ce51a83a2","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T11:34:31.028535Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T11:34:31.100352Z","title":"Identifying test -suite-overfitted patches through test case generation,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2017},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.22580","last_updated":"2026-07-31T16:15:56Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T13:58:36.616554Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-30T11:21:09Z","title":"RePaCA: Leveraging Reasoning Large Language Models for Static Automated Patch Correctness Assessment","version":2},"reference_index":9,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T11:34:31.100352Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.22580"},"observation_digest":"sha256:0216b1d4ba8fbbcc94da444ea5a7958de59ac91a57855e55a2ebda7aaaf53487","observation_id":"f3744043-d065-4213-82de-ef01d1377e5d","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T11:34:31.100352Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"publication/3691563","doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T11:34:35.398076Z","title":"Invalidator: Automated Patch Correctness Assessment via Semantic and Syntactic Reasoning,","venue":null,"work_id":"28131a12-c61b-4afe-9fe6-ffa32df98f75","year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.22580","last_updated":"2026-07-31T16:15:56Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T13:58:36.616554Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-30T11:21:09Z","title":"RePaCA: Leveraging Reasoning Large Language Models for Static Automated Patch Correctness Assessment","version":2},"reference_index":10,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T11:34:31.646400Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.22580"},"observation_digest":"sha256:1a692c6e80a726376058a464b9abb243564bd8fbd42e8e43990619174b8b6fa2","observation_id":"5c99c56a-9006-4e4a-9d0b-afcb8794681b","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T11:34:35.479687Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"7846.12979","doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T11:34:35.672714Z","title":"Randoop: feedback -directed random testing for Java,","venue":null,"work_id":"e4d8b64d-2e1c-4225-aad3-992b09d875ab","year":2007},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.22580","last_updated":"2026-07-31T16:15:56Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T13:58:36.616554Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-30T11:21:09Z","title":"RePaCA: Leveraging Reasoning Large Language Models for Static Automated Patch Correctness Assessment","version":2},"reference_index":11,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T11:34:31.341072Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.22580"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f71981e09dde15fcdd7f2b26976230c08c5890e4875727f64d820fa2cf58c072","observation_id":"cb987f10-5330-4064-8f3c-7300defeafa9","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T11:34:35.711013Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"metadata_mismatch"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T11:34:31.462737Z","title":"Identifying patch correctness in test-based program repair,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.22580","last_updated":"2026-07-31T16:15:56Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T13:58:36.616554Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-30T11:21:09Z","title":"RePaCA: Leveraging Reasoning Large Language Models for Static Automated Patch Correctness Assessment","version":2},"reference_index":12,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T11:34:31.462737Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.22580"},"observation_digest":"sha256:8833a03e9e2977de09db4a9a221e0e6828456b8023bb4f4a5972696006a5052e","observation_id":"6af16a3e-8f29-4ebc-85ef-b302ce77c130","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T11:34:31.462737Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":"10.1145/3505247","metadata_source":"doi_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T11:34:34.404466Z","title":"Context -Aware Code Change Embedding for Better Patch Correctness Assessment,","venue":null,"work_id":"c8cd735e-54d5-4951-b7a4-1767d5b1094a","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.22580","last_updated":"2026-07-31T16:15:56Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T13:58:36.616554Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-30T11:21:09Z","title":"RePaCA: Leveraging Reasoning Large Language Models for Static Automated Patch Correctness Assessment","version":2},"reference_index":13,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T11:34:31.551311Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.22580"},"observation_digest":"sha256:3e3ebd16f49f2694864f2697a8862a92c3019cb67a6d91c0b351ad4ecd817490","observation_id":"18ebd0a2-92df-4381-ad38-b2b5875751e3","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T11:34:34.516976Z","resolver_source":"doi","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2201.11903","last_updated":"2023-01-10T23:07:57Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T02:11:23.670680Z","submitted_at":"2022-01-28T02:33:07Z","title":"Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models","version":6},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2201.11903","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T11:34:32.058066Z","title":"Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.22580","last_updated":"2026-07-31T16:15:56Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T13:58:36.616554Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-30T11:21:09Z","title":"RePaCA: Leveraging Reasoning Large Language Models for Static Automated Patch Correctness Assessment","version":2},"reference_index":14,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T11:34:32.058066Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2201.11903","citing_paper":"/paper/2507.22580"},"observation_digest":"sha256:544b421ca52e17dadfef430da56232eeed3a8835e749cb869ed1f900e8e90f00","observation_id":"a433020e-3859-4f91-ae65-5c6d1a4863d5","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T11:34:32.058066Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T11:34:31.729550Z","title":"APPT: Boosting Automated Patch Correctness Prediction via Fine- Tuning Pre-Trained Models,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.22580","last_updated":"2026-07-31T16:15:56Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T13:58:36.616554Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-30T11:21:09Z","title":"RePaCA: Leveraging Reasoning Large Language Models for Static Automated Patch Correctness Assessment","version":2},"reference_index":15,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T11:34:31.729550Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.22580"},"observation_digest":"sha256:6f2b5f2a67bb14b3fce49722b115563bc7b3a24e02df4c49605c4890f39405d8","observation_id":"77c31d8e-bedd-4f03-8e1e-7aebf1e08d6f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T11:34:31.729550Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T11:34:31.842678Z","title":"Automated Classification of Overfitting Patches with Statically Extracted Code Features,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.22580","last_updated":"2026-07-31T16:15:56Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T13:58:36.616554Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-30T11:21:09Z","title":"RePaCA: Leveraging Reasoning Large Language Models for Static Automated Patch Correctness Assessment","version":2},"reference_index":16,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T11:34:31.842678Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.22580"},"observation_digest":"sha256:0f576e3d59c2d873b2022e46740ad4339626c1ad7031fa1bfd8b2fb7d421ceb6","observation_id":"4381d4e7-f7af-4b72-80e7-cee273ead433","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T11:34:31.842678Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T11:34:31.944964Z","title":"Is this Change the Answer to that Problem? Correlating Descriptions of Bug and Code Changes for Evaluating Patch Correctness,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.22580","last_updated":"2026-07-31T16:15:56Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T13:58:36.616554Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-30T11:21:09Z","title":"RePaCA: Leveraging Reasoning Large Language Models for Static Automated Patch Correctness Assessment","version":2},"reference_index":17,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T11:34:31.944964Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.22580"},"observation_digest":"sha256:3d45db2959fbf98fb40aafa5019e05efd1c0f2a39e772490fd2061e8f35fc7a5","observation_id":"d94a6100-866f-4f34-96ea-d5d39ee62514","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T11:34:31.944964Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1810.04805","last_updated":"2019-05-24T20:37:26Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-30T09:12:38.100527Z","submitted_at":"2018-10-11T00:50:01Z","title":"BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"1810.04805","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T11:34:32.433493Z","title":"BERT: Pre -training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2019},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.22580","last_updated":"2026-07-31T16:15:56Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T13:58:36.616554Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-30T11:21:09Z","title":"RePaCA: Leveraging Reasoning Large Language Models for Static Automated Patch Correctness Assessment","version":2},"reference_index":18,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T11:34:32.433493Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/1810.04805","citing_paper":"/paper/2507.22580"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f1b99e6c6933a251486c0f690687cef1af997241e96a5b1f8da72bcf43b77e55","observation_id":"dee298df-6cd8-400c-a935-5604f2eb7f71","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T11:34:32.433493Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2402.03300","last_updated":"2024-04-27T15:25:53Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:58:42.911363Z","submitted_at":"2024-02-05T18:55:32Z","title":"DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models","version":3},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2402.03300","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T11:34:32.153891Z","title":"DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.22580","last_updated":"2026-07-31T16:15:56Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T13:58:36.616554Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-30T11:21:09Z","title":"RePaCA: Leveraging Reasoning Large Language Models for Static Automated Patch Correctness Assessment","version":2},"reference_index":19,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T11:34:32.153891Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2402.03300","citing_paper":"/paper/2507.22580"},"observation_digest":"sha256:646987df695868aeeab6897d617fa95de09712a7928a39b60389d1b6f404c5c2","observation_id":"846da3ce-033b-4a64-ad2e-76afbd327e39","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T11:34:32.153891Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2002.08155","last_updated":"2020-09-18T15:38:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T02:11:23.670680Z","submitted_at":"2020-02-19T13:09:07Z","title":"CodeBERT: A Pre-Trained Model for Programming and Natural Languages","version":4},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2002.08155","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T11:34:32.336052Z","title":"CodeBERT: A Pre -Trained Model for Programming and Natural Languages,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.22580","last_updated":"2026-07-31T16:15:56Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T13:58:36.616554Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-30T11:21:09Z","title":"RePaCA: Leveraging Reasoning Large Language Models for Static Automated Patch Correctness Assessment","version":2},"reference_index":21,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T11:34:32.336052Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2002.08155","citing_paper":"/paper/2507.22580"},"observation_digest":"sha256:15e5405bbd491e3a8c40511c4f51e1c8bdc63117be9d0c18bc77fe680c14c724","observation_id":"ea1c514b-1c8d-4769-8de8-e8feddf325de","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T11:34:32.336052Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2024.34522","doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T11:34:34.982723Z","title":"Leveraging Large Language Model for Automatic Patch Correctness Assessment,","venue":null,"work_id":"5608ba72-df07-4a6b-a368-66bf111a8598","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.22580","last_updated":"2026-07-31T16:15:56Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T13:58:36.616554Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-30T11:21:09Z","title":"RePaCA: Leveraging Reasoning Large Language Models for Static Automated Patch Correctness Assessment","version":2},"reference_index":22,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T11:34:32.888357Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.22580"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a6ce651e85a7f2a7e66023d33f6ef7223744377ee6560d1f5c321651767eb014","observation_id":"61c5518e-4d17-4def-acfc-db35563f3e78","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T11:34:35.052459Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"metadata_mismatch"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1707.06347","last_updated":"2017-08-28T09:20:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T02:11:23.670680Z","submitted_at":"2017-07-20T02:32:33Z","title":"Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"1707.06347","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T11:34:32.566442Z","title":"Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2017},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.22580","last_updated":"2026-07-31T16:15:56Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T13:58:36.616554Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-30T11:21:09Z","title":"RePaCA: Leveraging Reasoning Large Language Models for Static Automated Patch Correctness Assessment","version":2},"reference_index":23,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T11:34:32.566442Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/1707.06347","citing_paper":"/paper/2507.22580"},"observation_digest":"sha256:00268ca76de441007038e61e6d82e41951e69d4a77a8bbb3fdb5fbc6181677bf","observation_id":"2587b580-0993-4a95-b539-6a6d1561ff3a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T11:34:32.566442Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2411.17204","last_updated":"2024-11-28T01:04:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:54:22.450478Z","submitted_at":"2024-11-26T08:21:24Z","title":"Strategic Prompting for Conversational Tasks: A Comparative Analysis of Large Language Models Across Diverse Conversational Tasks","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2411.17204","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2411.17204","metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"2411.17204","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T12:16:18.182151Z","title":"Strategic Prompting for Conversational Tasks: A Comparative Analysis of Large Language Models Across Diverse Conversational Tasks","venue":"cs.CL","work_id":"8d0544f0-9064-4d0a-b50b-c7c4ab3dbaca","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.22580","last_updated":"2026-07-31T16:15:56Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T13:58:36.616554Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-30T11:21:09Z","title":"RePaCA: Leveraging Reasoning Large Language Models for Static Automated Patch Correctness Assessment","version":2},"reference_index":24,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T11:34:32.668620Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2411.17204","citing_paper":"/paper/2507.22580"},"observation_digest":"sha256:3211b18d346675cd33a3f88ed0b30444e146522cc37d12d6401120352aef10e2","observation_id":"a21122c0-39d2-4634-9367-1e21e585558d","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T11:34:34.291422Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.12948","last_updated":"2026-01-04T03:57:36Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T02:11:23.670680Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-22T15:19:35Z","title":"DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2501.12948","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T11:34:32.788331Z","title":"DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.22580","last_updated":"2026-07-31T16:15:56Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T13:58:36.616554Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-30T11:21:09Z","title":"RePaCA: Leveraging Reasoning Large Language Models for Static Automated Patch Correctness Assessment","version":2},"reference_index":25,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T11:34:32.788331Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2501.12948","citing_paper":"/paper/2507.22580"},"observation_digest":"sha256:0d4969dace28f5bb68dacfb2cda87592a766c90a71ff158aeab436f3f6fbb9e6","observation_id":"d24aa7ab-652d-45e4-ac2c-75426287ac65","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T11:34:32.788331Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T11:34:33.205816Z","title":"How Often Do Single -Statement Bugs Occur? The ManySStuBs4J Dataset,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.22580","last_updated":"2026-07-31T16:15:56Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T13:58:36.616554Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-30T11:21:09Z","title":"RePaCA: Leveraging Reasoning Large Language Models for Static Automated Patch Correctness Assessment","version":2},"reference_index":26,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T11:34:33.205816Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.22580"},"observation_digest":"sha256:410b390ef4629d7ece46eb22f0a22b946887e9afe9d1793cb82c73cc5aa94f52","observation_id":"f4e800d2-0cea-4032-ad91-74316c05ead7","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T11:34:33.205816Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2412.15115","last_updated":"2025-01-03T02:18:21Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T02:11:23.670680Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-19T17:56:09Z","title":"Qwen2.5 Technical Report","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2412.15115","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T11:34:32.957532Z","title":"Qwen2.5 Technical Report,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.22580","last_updated":"2026-07-31T16:15:56Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T13:58:36.616554Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-30T11:21:09Z","title":"RePaCA: Leveraging Reasoning Large Language Models for Static Automated Patch Correctness Assessment","version":2},"reference_index":27,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T11:34:32.957532Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2412.15115","citing_paper":"/paper/2507.22580"},"observation_digest":"sha256:9dabcfa50716badc40f28e1f989d878fb5799155388af2d4b428c7e3ad4fac32","observation_id":"a6115eaf-378d-410a-bff1-4aead3180458","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T11:34:32.957532Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2008.02944","last_updated":"2020-08-07T01:49:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-03T21:38:52.458346Z","submitted_at":"2020-08-07T01:49:40Z","title":"Evaluating Representation Learning of Code Changes for Predicting Patch Correctness in Program Repair","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2008.02944","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2008.02944","metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"2008.02944","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T12:16:18.182151Z","title":"Evaluating Representation Learning of Code Changes for Predicting Patch Correctness in Program Repair","venue":"cs.SE","work_id":"fea7deb1-95fa-43ce-94f4-3f4bf64a586d","year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.22580","last_updated":"2026-07-31T16:15:56Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T13:58:36.616554Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-30T11:21:09Z","title":"RePaCA: Leveraging Reasoning Large Language Models for Static Automated Patch Correctness Assessment","version":2},"reference_index":28,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T11:34:33.039687Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2008.02944","citing_paper":"/paper/2507.22580"},"observation_digest":"sha256:2a6070e38681f7b937e25af463cd1eff84488fda32138a9c5bf6c1f906c99931","observation_id":"691a64c3-82c7-4a6b-bf82-424aaa847cba","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T11:34:34.026065Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T11:34:33.111654Z","title":"Defects4J: a database of existing faults to enable controlled testing studies for Java programs,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2014},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.22580","last_updated":"2026-07-31T16:15:56Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T13:58:36.616554Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-30T11:21:09Z","title":"RePaCA: Leveraging Reasoning Large Language Models for Static Automated Patch Correctness Assessment","version":2},"reference_index":29,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T11:34:33.111654Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.22580"},"observation_digest":"sha256:1d44d82d7153df91e0caed8425e9b6a56b2b471fe2a8f798a35701da491addd9","observation_id":"fe64f55b-7d9e-4e9a-bb14-a8e894bf16e0","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T11:34:33.111654Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1905.11973","last_updated":"2019-05-28T17:49:19Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T07:56:11.645313Z","submitted_at":"2019-05-28T17:49:19Z","title":"Empirical Review of Java Program Repair Tools: A Large-Scale Experiment on 2,141 Bugs and 23,551 Repair Attempts","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"1905.11973","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.1905.11973","metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"1905.11973","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T12:16:18.182151Z","title":"Empirical Review of Java Program Repair Tools: A Large-Scale Experiment on 2,141 Bugs and 23,551 Repair Attempts","venue":"cs.SE","work_id":"a111d5a8-856c-441b-a9e7-709ed4d32b4e","year":2019},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.22580","last_updated":"2026-07-31T16:15:56Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T13:58:36.616554Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-30T11:21:09Z","title":"RePaCA: Leveraging Reasoning Large Language Models for Static Automated Patch Correctness Assessment","version":2},"reference_index":31,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T11:34:33.300914Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/1905.11973","citing_paper":"/paper/2507.22580"},"observation_digest":"sha256:3bd8949ca118daff46d19b9577e3658177df2a3cd3aab7622a4e0f0af81d4ab1","observation_id":"faaaaa88-432a-4be0-acbb-39b1421125e3","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T11:34:33.854813Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T11:34:36.249519Z","title":"Group Relative Policy Optimization for Image Captioning","venue":null,"work_id":"6563f98e-8171-42ed-8d69-7f16ab063bab","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.22580","last_updated":"2026-07-31T16:15:56Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T13:58:36.616554Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-30T11:21:09Z","title":"RePaCA: Leveraging Reasoning Large Language Models for Static Automated Patch Correctness Assessment","version":2},"reference_index":32,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T11:34:33.386497Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.22580"},"observation_digest":"sha256:815fcafff36f6508376e2a42bb668a93e05c78f39a3d6a1a04d38dd66ccdcc78","observation_id":"a39975b3-a709-4502-97cc-867693f4d1c5","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T11:34:36.302428Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":"10.1007/s10664-020-09920-w","metadata_source":"doi_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T11:34:33.626075Z","title":"Automated patch assessment for program repair at scale,","venue":null,"work_id":"9945aa8a-bf59-4927-a1c0-60112663e7d2","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.22580","last_updated":"2026-07-31T16:15:56Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T13:58:36.616554Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-30T11:21:09Z","title":"RePaCA: Leveraging Reasoning Large Language Models for Static Automated Patch Correctness Assessment","version":2},"reference_index":34,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T11:34:33.532158Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.22580"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c73561626ed24aa641390a248e9f4bac1021ec9d93f609e6aa066ffc09a9d510","observation_id":"f5cf60c1-9161-4e2b-a8ea-e1df91c597a5","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T11:34:33.665158Z","resolver_source":"doi","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"1783.27717","doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T11:34:36.091670Z","title":"2015, pp","venue":null,"work_id":"702a0fad-6b24-4261-9e7f-a3936f6974e9","year":2015},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.22580","last_updated":"2026-07-31T16:15:56Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T13:58:36.616554Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-30T11:21:09Z","title":"RePaCA: Leveraging Reasoning Large Language Models for Static Automated Patch Correctness Assessment","version":2},"reference_index":2015,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T11:34:30.848120Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.22580"},"observation_digest":"sha256:0f154a664d08e65b0ee4cbd28209406045c6c48a0b0e95a54bfda0d99cbd821d","observation_id":"a746c402-83b1-4f94-ba2a-29e2694ab2ac","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T11:34:36.169929Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"metadata_mismatch"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2503.01333","last_updated":"2025-03-03T09:16:41Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T17:31:28.666642Z","submitted_at":"2025-03-03T09:16:41Z","title":"Group Relative Policy Optimization for Image Captioning","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2503.01333","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T11:34:33.476538Z","title":"Available: https://arxiv.org/html/2503.01333v1","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.22580","last_updated":"2026-07-31T16:15:56Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T13:58:36.616554Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-30T11:21:09Z","title":"RePaCA: Leveraging Reasoning Large Language Models for Static Automated Patch Correctness Assessment","version":2},"reference_index":2025,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T11:34:33.476538Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2503.01333","citing_paper":"/paper/2507.22580"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a324a47353863f6b69092005526889d503ff7dd3989cb7f82895de41fa566c68","observation_id":"2096c30c-b3a8-4d54-b7c5-4852d71eebc3","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T11:34:33.476538Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}}],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.22580","last_updated":"2026-07-31T16:15:56Z","latest_version":2,"primary_category":"cs.SE","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T13:58:36.616554Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-30T11:21:09Z","title":"RePaCA: Leveraging Reasoning Large Language Models for Static Automated Patch Correctness Assessment"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":33,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":3,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":19,"verified_exact":7,"verified_fuzzy":4},"total_outbound_references":33},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 8 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 33 of 33 outbound references and 1 inbound Pith citation observation for arXiv:2507.22580."}