{"as_of":"2026-08-09T12:05:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:375f6acd4846a2eef7acbff5ed6d3ea290861bf8d812419dfc16db6030162303","coverage":[{"denominator":0,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":1,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":1,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:41:51.978724Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"pith","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:41:56.801948Z","state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2508.08287","last_updated":"2025-08-04T07:27:26Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:54:53.548456Z","submitted_at":"2025-08-04T07:27:26Z","title":"Sacred or Synthetic? Evaluating LLM Reliability and Abstention for Religious Questions","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2508.08287","doi":null,"metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"2508.08287","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:41:56.801948Z","title":"Sacred or Synthetic? Evaluating LLM Reliability and Abstention for Religious Questions","venue":"cs.CL","work_id":"c6411298-61d3-4044-92bd-d727d2e84661","year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2608.04703","last_updated":"2026-08-05T11:12:48Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T09:36:47.759210Z","submitted_at":"2026-08-05T11:12:48Z","title":"IslamicTurathBench: A Multi-Task, Multi-Discipline Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models on the Islamic Scholarly Tradition (turath)","version":1},"reference_index":8,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:41:51.978724Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2508.08287","citing_paper":"/paper/2608.04703"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c60173ec142ef597bb6489ad18dee2a5ecff5b5aef987e8f2c1549cd09dff0e1","observation_id":"95f9c595-0fc0-4871-bb34-9d30b98ada13","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:41:56.860167Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}}],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2508.08287/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2508.08287/integrity","json":"/paper/2508.08287/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2508.08287"},"outbound":[],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2508.08287","last_updated":"2025-08-04T07:27:26Z","latest_version":1,"primary_category":"cs.CL","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:54:53.548456Z","submitted_at":"2025-08-04T07:27:26Z","title":"Sacred or Synthetic? Evaluating LLM Reliability and Abstention for Religious Questions"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":0,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":0,"verified_exact":0,"verified_fuzzy":0},"total_outbound_references":0},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 9 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 1 inbound Pith citation observation for arXiv:2508.08287."}