{"as_of":"2026-08-18T22:04:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:af543576c489c4a0c7e071327e9cf6b763f0a6b3bdfeffcfa72db06961ab9b46","coverage":[{"denominator":53,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":53,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:47.919152Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":53,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":53,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":0,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"cited_works","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2508.11678/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2508.11678/integrity","json":"/paper/2508.11678/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2508.11678"},"outbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:51.962853Z","title":"Insights about large-scale online peer assessment from an analysis of an astronomy MOOC,","venue":null,"work_id":"714cb104-8806-4ddf-86b0-930d7b9211ff","year":2017},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2508.11678","last_updated":"2025-08-25T15:28:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T11:27:11.275346Z","submitted_at":"2025-08-08T15:28:39Z","title":"Optimizing Peer Grading: A Systematic Literature Review of Reviewer Assignment Strategies and Quantity of Reviewers","version":2},"reference_index":1,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:44.545885Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2508.11678"},"observation_digest":"sha256:53d1957f4de0e62c231f6cf353ea345aab148457cb79eef09aefbcaec3965a27","observation_id":"0bb64ab6-c08b-402f-b043-0adae2bd1348","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:51.966011Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:34.496301+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:51.953637Z","title":"Validity of peer grading using calibrated peer review in a guided-inquiry, conceptual physics course,","venue":null,"work_id":"5dfe1e3a-cac8-4f8d-8676-d6e416d63482","year":2016},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2508.11678","last_updated":"2025-08-25T15:28:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T11:27:11.275346Z","submitted_at":"2025-08-08T15:28:39Z","title":"Optimizing Peer Grading: A Systematic Literature Review of Reviewer Assignment Strategies and Quantity of Reviewers","version":2},"reference_index":2,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:44.587870Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2508.11678"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c238c103ddc7f80c5dcf0a4c1f628abdd2a7b25e7b4eead23eacb2181a8a5949","observation_id":"6d064969-a296-409b-9fca-0d32319357f2","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:51.956573Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:34.496301+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:51.944426Z","title":"Auto grouping and peer grading system in massive open online course (mooc),","venue":null,"work_id":"15b46def-2bc9-41b9-9d09-441efbfd4ca7","year":2015},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2508.11678","last_updated":"2025-08-25T15:28:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T11:27:11.275346Z","submitted_at":"2025-08-08T15:28:39Z","title":"Optimizing Peer Grading: A Systematic Literature Review of Reviewer Assignment Strategies and Quantity of Reviewers","version":2},"reference_index":3,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:44.668118Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2508.11678"},"observation_digest":"sha256:ec6e8f66da1d4d2634db217b34438ad98e235bf177d14fc918a313e7065839fe","observation_id":"f0bbc326-b4c4-4a4f-8d63-381deace2b24","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:51.947472Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:34.496301+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:51.935148Z","title":"Feed-forward assessment, exemplars and peer marking: evidence of efficacy,","venue":null,"work_id":"d27a05f2-4a05-4e47-96a2-0c383e1063ba","year":2013},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2508.11678","last_updated":"2025-08-25T15:28:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T11:27:11.275346Z","submitted_at":"2025-08-08T15:28:39Z","title":"Optimizing Peer Grading: A Systematic Literature Review of Reviewer Assignment Strategies and Quantity of Reviewers","version":2},"reference_index":4,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:44.729684Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2508.11678"},"observation_digest":"sha256:7a21af15f3beeba54083a092f1f88e7382aaeba2d2b97030ed9bb9a82f50aba3","observation_id":"2f1789e8-d56f-4151-9cd5-fb056859cfad","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:51.938209Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:34.496301+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:51.925201Z","title":"Improving peer assessment with graph neural networks,","venue":null,"work_id":"ae0887ec-4d6e-434f-aa4b-6914a0f1700f","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2508.11678","last_updated":"2025-08-25T15:28:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T11:27:11.275346Z","submitted_at":"2025-08-08T15:28:39Z","title":"Optimizing Peer Grading: A Systematic Literature Review of Reviewer Assignment Strategies and Quantity of Reviewers","version":2},"reference_index":5,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:44.794207Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2508.11678"},"observation_digest":"sha256:0c52c280e19b0186952cf8fca179bc75e060ab58173ace032ccef622a69ada63","observation_id":"a41655d8-be21-4ff8-9721-c5293843ae29","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:51.928111Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:34.496301+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:51.915717Z","title":"Machine and social intelligent peer-assessment systems for assessing large student populations in massive open online education,","venue":null,"work_id":"cac6127e-db0c-4168-b4f6-c7d379625f81","year":2013},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2508.11678","last_updated":"2025-08-25T15:28:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T11:27:11.275346Z","submitted_at":"2025-08-08T15:28:39Z","title":"Optimizing Peer Grading: A Systematic Literature Review of Reviewer Assignment Strategies and Quantity of Reviewers","version":2},"reference_index":6,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:44.812959Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2508.11678"},"observation_digest":"sha256:21ab65092592e109b61d86c12bb96450d609a4f1a6eb55ea20dc67c06c96715f","observation_id":"08193e24-20de-4a56-8188-e56e9339ff7e","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:51.918756Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:34.496301+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:51.906247Z","title":"Improving peer grading reliability with graph mining techniques,","venue":null,"work_id":"3d8c5d76-5d1d-4b93-8dfb-2dd9aac7c0bc","year":2016},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2508.11678","last_updated":"2025-08-25T15:28:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T11:27:11.275346Z","submitted_at":"2025-08-08T15:28:39Z","title":"Optimizing Peer Grading: A Systematic Literature Review of Reviewer Assignment Strategies and Quantity of Reviewers","version":2},"reference_index":7,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:44.858269Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2508.11678"},"observation_digest":"sha256:3eba6752119bb6916dfb8ac8c429673f291b132e5f0596f2e822427a2a6b6b44","observation_id":"0670202e-9704-4e61-a004-1d9c306b8c66","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:51.909428Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:34.496301+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:51.896842Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"5667c3a2-7b14-4f0c-ab4a-25ce9eedb5ed","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2508.11678","last_updated":"2025-08-25T15:28:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T11:27:11.275346Z","submitted_at":"2025-08-08T15:28:39Z","title":"Optimizing Peer Grading: A Systematic Literature Review of Reviewer Assignment Strategies and Quantity of Reviewers","version":2},"reference_index":8,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:44.901916Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2508.11678"},"observation_digest":"sha256:7dcd3839b3fca76a1ce1cfe495e84fdb94ce6f2f3938eef23a9e393bb3919657","observation_id":"f44aeacd-97a3-40eb-8e1b-d6b3eddd2310","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:51.899998Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:34.496301+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:51.887439Z","title":"Improving es- say peer grading accuracy in massive open online courses using personalized weights from student’s engagement and performance,","venue":null,"work_id":"1c1599e1-f025-4d3c-bac8-8f479c7e8027","year":2019},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2508.11678","last_updated":"2025-08-25T15:28:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T11:27:11.275346Z","submitted_at":"2025-08-08T15:28:39Z","title":"Optimizing Peer Grading: A Systematic Literature Review of Reviewer Assignment Strategies and Quantity of Reviewers","version":2},"reference_index":9,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:44.939464Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2508.11678"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f3be8836b8e110c1422f0425d97110c6c4a41d90ee4e153cf517e6a0c3c7006a","observation_id":"2f26c826-5c07-41ce-aa99-bde3e33a91da","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:51.890570Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:34.496301+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1405.7192","last_updated":"2014-05-28T10:51:57Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T23:32:27.195488Z","submitted_at":"2014-05-28T10:51:57Z","title":"The PeerRank Method for Peer Assessment","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"1405.7192","doi":null,"metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"1405.7192","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:48.183632Z","title":"The PeerRank Method for Peer Assessment","venue":"cs.AI","work_id":"6b87d407-d991-438e-b8bd-ae4d3ca7a0b1","year":2014},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2508.11678","last_updated":"2025-08-25T15:28:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T11:27:11.275346Z","submitted_at":"2025-08-08T15:28:39Z","title":"Optimizing Peer Grading: A Systematic Literature Review of Reviewer Assignment Strategies and Quantity of Reviewers","version":2},"reference_index":10,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:45.054527Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/1405.7192","citing_paper":"/paper/2508.11678"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e63efb32ee857bfac8987765a146ab94394a22306563a4e0adbdb689ac278880","observation_id":"4f592031-878a-42ab-a282-8ee356ac0a4e","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:48.219367Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:34.496301+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:51.877438Z","title":"Peer assessment in moocs: Systematic literature review,","venue":null,"work_id":"f42c04e1-7832-4580-b5d9-f2a688021f77","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2508.11678","last_updated":"2025-08-25T15:28:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T11:27:11.275346Z","submitted_at":"2025-08-08T15:28:39Z","title":"Optimizing Peer Grading: A Systematic Literature Review of Reviewer Assignment Strategies and Quantity of Reviewers","version":2},"reference_index":11,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:45.108505Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2508.11678"},"observation_digest":"sha256:906d64067e37dae0071dc936dd4d438f4e8cea4d8dc94bb27ae74ffcc6d0e715","observation_id":"0ec3c9fc-fff1-4904-acc0-54531c63e98e","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:51.880492Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:34.496301+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2001.10617","last_updated":"2020-01-27T15:59:24Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T21:33:07.640437Z","submitted_at":"2020-01-27T15:59:24Z","title":"Systematic Review of Approaches to Improve Peer Assessment at Scale","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2001.10617","doi":null,"metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"2001.10617","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:48.091394Z","title":"Systematic Review of Approaches to Improve Peer Assessment at Scale","venue":"cs.CY","work_id":"2a1ce0b8-0047-476e-b330-d6ccf514f448","year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2508.11678","last_updated":"2025-08-25T15:28:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T11:27:11.275346Z","submitted_at":"2025-08-08T15:28:39Z","title":"Optimizing Peer Grading: A Systematic Literature Review of Reviewer Assignment Strategies and Quantity of Reviewers","version":2},"reference_index":12,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:45.161537Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2001.10617","citing_paper":"/paper/2508.11678"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e5dc3f0e2fff4950398ef64cb99327603cef985188742e2963b7938d1bd0da2a","observation_id":"83166cfa-93d4-4540-bdc6-d890ffb409d2","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:48.122151Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:34.496301+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:51.868079Z","title":"An empirical review of anonymity effects in peer assessment, peer feedback, peer review, peer evaluation and peer grading,","venue":null,"work_id":"a87fae5e-0421-4296-b8cc-a114ce6b6a42","year":2019},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2508.11678","last_updated":"2025-08-25T15:28:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T11:27:11.275346Z","submitted_at":"2025-08-08T15:28:39Z","title":"Optimizing Peer Grading: A Systematic Literature Review of Reviewer Assignment Strategies and Quantity of Reviewers","version":2},"reference_index":13,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:45.246557Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2508.11678"},"observation_digest":"sha256:27584920611fada11276bcb8df8ce7273faed89b5ad94c607d4d34dffeeb7c98","observation_id":"2b3bb3fd-aa06-4d32-b7cb-9c295849f875","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:51.871224Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:34.496301+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:51.858761Z","title":"Declaración prisma 2020: una guía actualizada para la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas,","venue":null,"work_id":"4f7745fd-5273-4145-a551-54362a8f1a01","year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2508.11678","last_updated":"2025-08-25T15:28:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T11:27:11.275346Z","submitted_at":"2025-08-08T15:28:39Z","title":"Optimizing Peer Grading: A Systematic Literature Review of Reviewer Assignment Strategies and Quantity of Reviewers","version":2},"reference_index":14,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:45.336033Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2508.11678"},"observation_digest":"sha256:8f19848c8c3d52424d75e26972df4d945cfb24e5ce2f2bcdf06b5c39c68a663f","observation_id":"dd795c70-c418-41db-9fe7-7fda44435af2","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:51.861918Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:34.496301+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:51.849406Z","title":"The measurement of observer agreement for cate- gorical data,","venue":null,"work_id":"f3cbde6c-39da-4f56-bfbc-d658c0cef180","year":1977},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2508.11678","last_updated":"2025-08-25T15:28:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T11:27:11.275346Z","submitted_at":"2025-08-08T15:28:39Z","title":"Optimizing Peer Grading: A Systematic Literature Review of Reviewer Assignment Strategies and Quantity of Reviewers","version":2},"reference_index":15,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:45.371719Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2508.11678"},"observation_digest":"sha256:30ba5027c05f88815d8be2d2350e0a2fa3eec37e71612ed47bbee3f28495e1c6","observation_id":"f1cc3da1-a771-4f1a-b31a-7a7f810c4547","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:51.852380Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:34.496301+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:51.840142Z","title":"Flipped small group classes and peer marking: incen- tives, student participation and performance in a quasi-experimental approach,","venue":null,"work_id":"6d3a9124-26f9-490f-85af-e8477d3a760d","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2508.11678","last_updated":"2025-08-25T15:28:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T11:27:11.275346Z","submitted_at":"2025-08-08T15:28:39Z","title":"Optimizing Peer Grading: A Systematic Literature Review of Reviewer Assignment Strategies and Quantity of Reviewers","version":2},"reference_index":16,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:45.414110Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2508.11678"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a0d159732bc29110127df5615cd6646926fccb2768b26ea8a6912a1f6e9b9cd7","observation_id":"81f88205-2a45-420b-ab7a-e288e0b90bc9","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:51.843191Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:34.496301+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:51.830683Z","title":"Simulating massive open on-line courses dy- namics,","venue":null,"work_id":"31152e69-d764-4d39-b7ac-f34a1fa17069","year":2019},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2508.11678","last_updated":"2025-08-25T15:28:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T11:27:11.275346Z","submitted_at":"2025-08-08T15:28:39Z","title":"Optimizing Peer Grading: A Systematic Literature Review of Reviewer Assignment Strategies and Quantity of Reviewers","version":2},"reference_index":17,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:45.439936Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2508.11678"},"observation_digest":"sha256:4b5297a93526d1a2ca8f76d896450a88f49e3db84250339054db1063ccd91bb9","observation_id":"0b9ce784-bdb3-45e8-bcdb-4a4882150c35","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:51.833956Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:34.496301+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:51.821490Z","title":"Removing bias and incentivizing precision in peer-grading,","venue":null,"work_id":"0d4e7e8d-0d27-4390-9195-ac671818510f","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2508.11678","last_updated":"2025-08-25T15:28:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T11:27:11.275346Z","submitted_at":"2025-08-08T15:28:39Z","title":"Optimizing Peer Grading: A Systematic Literature Review of Reviewer Assignment Strategies and Quantity of Reviewers","version":2},"reference_index":18,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:45.529327Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2508.11678"},"observation_digest":"sha256:28971f7a00df8c0fb755b8504f2693b5c9a9334bba918c429738dac1bcb91973","observation_id":"29a97271-f1bf-4628-8180-49f1189999ac","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:51.824496Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:34.496301+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:51.812162Z","title":"Grading the graders: Motivating peer graders in a mooc,","venue":null,"work_id":"2135dee3-06b5-4b54-aa52-4c06c8870a6b","year":2015},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2508.11678","last_updated":"2025-08-25T15:28:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T11:27:11.275346Z","submitted_at":"2025-08-08T15:28:39Z","title":"Optimizing Peer Grading: A Systematic Literature Review of Reviewer Assignment Strategies and Quantity of Reviewers","version":2},"reference_index":19,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:45.672353Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2508.11678"},"observation_digest":"sha256:68b2f2241fafbe6d80977153e158333abc424a038f5e210c354876f0d068a4f1","observation_id":"794565ca-9efe-4933-8b57-903fc2c7ef51","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:51.815250Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:34.496301+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:51.802751Z","title":"Onthevalidityofpeergradingandacloudteaching assistant system,","venue":null,"work_id":"70631f43-ef94-421e-9bf7-b0b900a2f06d","year":2015},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2508.11678","last_updated":"2025-08-25T15:28:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T11:27:11.275346Z","submitted_at":"2025-08-08T15:28:39Z","title":"Optimizing Peer Grading: A Systematic Literature Review of Reviewer Assignment Strategies and Quantity of Reviewers","version":2},"reference_index":20,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:45.773295Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2508.11678"},"observation_digest":"sha256:41670e7bac6aea8a1954831b04df3a58118c8c0c4c383bc5612221a443bbc01f","observation_id":"b7f83327-df35-47df-b8ca-f954c7e456e3","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:51.805602Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:34.496301+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:51.793307Z","title":"Peer assessment in moocs based on learners’ profiles clustering,","venue":null,"work_id":"28a63205-dcf5-45e9-a0a8-31b748e19603","year":2017},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2508.11678","last_updated":"2025-08-25T15:28:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T11:27:11.275346Z","submitted_at":"2025-08-08T15:28:39Z","title":"Optimizing Peer Grading: A Systematic Literature Review of Reviewer Assignment Strategies and Quantity of Reviewers","version":2},"reference_index":21,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:45.923178Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2508.11678"},"observation_digest":"sha256:fef3e134dbb478272f9b0576ba167fe96f407bbf592694c0e098db2e03c2e66f","observation_id":"a013974a-7319-46ab-9b7c-5d64c718df95","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:51.796478Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:34.496301+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:51.783973Z","title":"Scaling up data science course projects: A case study,","venue":null,"work_id":"6c357084-de1a-4cd7-bdf7-a48a4c7d5436","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2508.11678","last_updated":"2025-08-25T15:28:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T11:27:11.275346Z","submitted_at":"2025-08-08T15:28:39Z","title":"Optimizing Peer Grading: A Systematic Literature Review of Reviewer Assignment Strategies and Quantity of Reviewers","version":2},"reference_index":22,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:46.015895Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2508.11678"},"observation_digest":"sha256:bf80517f5bc70785fde2c641b13b2630886d82160e88866ae4546df477787ada","observation_id":"ab5f52da-4524-4b40-a2b4-ad9bf94e9c60","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:51.787202Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:34.496301+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:51.774685Z","title":"Mechanical ta: Partially auto- mated high-stakes peer grading,","venue":null,"work_id":"af979b86-0924-47aa-9c03-bae5e2dca75e","year":2015},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2508.11678","last_updated":"2025-08-25T15:28:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T11:27:11.275346Z","submitted_at":"2025-08-08T15:28:39Z","title":"Optimizing Peer Grading: A Systematic Literature Review of Reviewer Assignment Strategies and Quantity of Reviewers","version":2},"reference_index":23,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:46.075462Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2508.11678"},"observation_digest":"sha256:07d1ecdaefdb00e10bf57fa7088b104d92826701adb6c7ad2b9210200ee4ef25","observation_id":"cd03024e-a8eb-4860-b302-69e676c1f81f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:51.777642Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:34.496301+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:51.765167Z","title":"Improving feedback and discussion in mooc peer assessement using introduced peers,","venue":null,"work_id":"b4c2071f-f283-4dca-a6e2-2dbd99b45abc","year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2508.11678","last_updated":"2025-08-25T15:28:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T11:27:11.275346Z","submitted_at":"2025-08-08T15:28:39Z","title":"Optimizing Peer Grading: A Systematic Literature Review of Reviewer Assignment Strategies and Quantity of Reviewers","version":2},"reference_index":24,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:46.177460Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2508.11678"},"observation_digest":"sha256:7a161d65ae9223f334ca335ba1625fd60fb122b15cfeb0ff27567ce73ca3ee7b","observation_id":"054b7453-25e2-46f0-a690-377414f2f267","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:51.768064Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:34.496301+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:51.755765Z","title":"Collaborative calibrated peer assessment in massive open online courses,","venue":null,"work_id":"630c5c08-9f67-4926-aecc-b891443ac58c","year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2508.11678","last_updated":"2025-08-25T15:28:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T11:27:11.275346Z","submitted_at":"2025-08-08T15:28:39Z","title":"Optimizing Peer Grading: A Systematic Literature Review of Reviewer Assignment Strategies and Quantity of Reviewers","version":2},"reference_index":25,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:46.274670Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2508.11678"},"observation_digest":"sha256:347dfbf3d680154c9e66549fcc2dd90069ac86e1888aac2b4ce4d5a64c51fda8","observation_id":"4ad93ab1-504d-47b8-9de9-c12e2d8bca82","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:51.758942Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:34.496301+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:51.746490Z","title":"Non-calibrated peer assessment: An effective assess- ment method for student creative works,","venue":null,"work_id":"cadc8134-cde7-46b6-b4a9-2d028a42933e","year":2015},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2508.11678","last_updated":"2025-08-25T15:28:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T11:27:11.275346Z","submitted_at":"2025-08-08T15:28:39Z","title":"Optimizing Peer Grading: A Systematic Literature Review of Reviewer Assignment Strategies and Quantity of Reviewers","version":2},"reference_index":26,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:46.322562Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2508.11678"},"observation_digest":"sha256:cf9a33c32aa01741ae35406c19f7abdaea09690bec1e534acadc23865fe565c0","observation_id":"aac98100-379c-43c7-aff4-f6aa3768bed8","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:51.749604Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:34.496301+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:51.737343Z","title":"A blockchain approach to academic assessment,","venue":null,"work_id":"beb4cdab-c1c0-428a-add3-3106f713ba74","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2508.11678","last_updated":"2025-08-25T15:28:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T11:27:11.275346Z","submitted_at":"2025-08-08T15:28:39Z","title":"Optimizing Peer Grading: A Systematic Literature Review of Reviewer Assignment Strategies and Quantity of Reviewers","version":2},"reference_index":27,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:46.347948Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2508.11678"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f5ad2f596741e2ad779b72e392a47b71fb15d1ac46bd83ec5f0b76ddd1696529","observation_id":"a1f91d36-3df3-43bd-bb9a-033d38d33e0f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:51.740184Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:34.496301+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:51.727883Z","title":"Identifying items for moderation in a peer assessment framework,","venue":null,"work_id":"9cd90cde-ca7e-460f-8a39-5c3066df93ed","year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2508.11678","last_updated":"2025-08-25T15:28:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T11:27:11.275346Z","submitted_at":"2025-08-08T15:28:39Z","title":"Optimizing Peer Grading: A Systematic Literature Review of Reviewer Assignment Strategies and Quantity of Reviewers","version":2},"reference_index":28,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:46.422115Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2508.11678"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b2a02c9a82c62a82592322f0f38b6c8cee5d82a25658b3a36280e6da83e921cd","observation_id":"2809681e-f0de-4d7a-8158-8b48832dec1e","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:51.730842Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:34.496301+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:51.718720Z","title":"How tool support and peer scoring improved our stu- dents’ attitudes toward peer reviews,","venue":null,"work_id":"70c92989-b750-47cd-8bfc-d4a633b7c390","year":2017},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2508.11678","last_updated":"2025-08-25T15:28:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T11:27:11.275346Z","submitted_at":"2025-08-08T15:28:39Z","title":"Optimizing Peer Grading: A Systematic Literature Review of Reviewer Assignment Strategies and Quantity of Reviewers","version":2},"reference_index":29,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:46.467773Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2508.11678"},"observation_digest":"sha256:9943d97d76e142b5efbe4def54976a10306bdedba9a087ceb86d3a74dbbcb53b","observation_id":"83748827-63df-49e0-a83f-5aa3621df545","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:51.721782Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:34.496301+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:51.709588Z","title":"Adaptive peer grading and formative assessment,","venue":null,"work_id":"ab7be637-c236-47c3-981b-299272a9d636","year":2017},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2508.11678","last_updated":"2025-08-25T15:28:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T11:27:11.275346Z","submitted_at":"2025-08-08T15:28:39Z","title":"Optimizing Peer Grading: A Systematic Literature Review of Reviewer Assignment Strategies and Quantity of Reviewers","version":2},"reference_index":30,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:46.528803Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2508.11678"},"observation_digest":"sha256:22fe727e507fbdd063f6cdb1fa32203eb92a2365f637be5e9dafde88c069d866","observation_id":"a153bb00-cf94-4fc2-81f0-fc7a5e33d1c0","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:51.712604Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:34.496301+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:51.555358Z","title":"Practical methods for semi-automated peer grading in a classroom setting,","venue":null,"work_id":"a23af514-9536-4f6d-83c6-a5a259d59847","year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2508.11678","last_updated":"2025-08-25T15:28:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T11:27:11.275346Z","submitted_at":"2025-08-08T15:28:39Z","title":"Optimizing Peer Grading: A Systematic Literature Review of Reviewer Assignment Strategies and Quantity of Reviewers","version":2},"reference_index":31,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:46.558164Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2508.11678"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e6e94bde06701ead132e0f8db3bb0fc230f57e6c008131226e3a90c8bf16cada","observation_id":"10234c18-2070-45a0-97e0-4b3af8c7fe52","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:51.605078Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:34.496301+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:51.476642Z","title":"How learning analytics can help orchestration of formative assessment? data-driven recommen- dations for technology- enhanced learning,","venue":null,"work_id":"e19a7c8b-cb72-425b-9c5e-0395834db788","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2508.11678","last_updated":"2025-08-25T15:28:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T11:27:11.275346Z","submitted_at":"2025-08-08T15:28:39Z","title":"Optimizing Peer Grading: A Systematic Literature Review of Reviewer Assignment Strategies and Quantity of Reviewers","version":2},"reference_index":32,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:46.611403Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2508.11678"},"observation_digest":"sha256:1088b607c29b478d99cea957d19fd2a67890ba9c17b759582652bb2e052591a2","observation_id":"e95ad149-368c-464e-817f-b2e27d10d587","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:51.543465Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:34.496301+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:51.303742Z","title":"Crowdgrader: a tool for crowdsourcing the eval- uation of homework assignments,","venue":null,"work_id":"5015717a-1768-4616-97a2-5a125199117a","year":2014},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2508.11678","last_updated":"2025-08-25T15:28:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T11:27:11.275346Z","submitted_at":"2025-08-08T15:28:39Z","title":"Optimizing Peer Grading: A Systematic Literature Review of Reviewer Assignment Strategies and Quantity of Reviewers","version":2},"reference_index":33,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:46.690144Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2508.11678"},"observation_digest":"sha256:4b6ce5b59ee18efd0b902eb567e4e50253c192570d7d4cba27050f26a08a2ea1","observation_id":"bec98ef9-2533-4873-9a25-a682a4f0fce9","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:51.383411Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:34.496301+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:51.142719Z","title":"Improving the peer as- sessment experience on mooc platforms,","venue":null,"work_id":"27d253a3-7c9b-467e-8dff-ae3378a9e446","year":2016},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2508.11678","last_updated":"2025-08-25T15:28:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T11:27:11.275346Z","submitted_at":"2025-08-08T15:28:39Z","title":"Optimizing Peer Grading: A Systematic Literature Review of Reviewer Assignment Strategies and Quantity of Reviewers","version":2},"reference_index":34,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:46.712911Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2508.11678"},"observation_digest":"sha256:091c3b629ca1ba82be5605eb4754fd28708e2d1cc6f335ffc1e7decf520830ff","observation_id":"7dd8d267-7e9d-4dde-a281-c21ed4d0077e","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:51.235163Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:34.496301+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:50.973006Z","title":"Automatedgradingforadvancedtopicscourses,","venue":null,"work_id":"6ea20a99-812c-4ea6-836a-ee58459c2b1e","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2508.11678","last_updated":"2025-08-25T15:28:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T11:27:11.275346Z","submitted_at":"2025-08-08T15:28:39Z","title":"Optimizing Peer Grading: A Systematic Literature Review of Reviewer Assignment Strategies and Quantity of Reviewers","version":2},"reference_index":35,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:46.754208Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2508.11678"},"observation_digest":"sha256:88ab0a56b79309f8bf39cfedd20b458a685b474480ca83f9fa9ab5e34d742d4d","observation_id":"69096759-08c7-483e-badb-b22f04083f4b","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:51.066354Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:34.496301+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:50.789597Z","title":"Learneval peer assessment platform: Iterative devel- opment process and evaluation,","venue":null,"work_id":"12db7a10-8844-462b-935c-451b6dda56d3","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2508.11678","last_updated":"2025-08-25T15:28:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T11:27:11.275346Z","submitted_at":"2025-08-08T15:28:39Z","title":"Optimizing Peer Grading: A Systematic Literature Review of Reviewer Assignment Strategies and Quantity of Reviewers","version":2},"reference_index":36,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:46.825648Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2508.11678"},"observation_digest":"sha256:5bbdf7387b3a8b805ae5a8e6503a5ba09c6b014a6fadfa204920d7bc94cab4ef","observation_id":"be08acf6-bf3f-4c09-8293-c6e7a8e8f4ad","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:50.873411Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:34.496301+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:50.496164Z","title":"Trust-aware peer assessment using multi-armed banditalgorithms,","venue":null,"work_id":"be4af5b8-1534-4c1a-b0a7-bc943c5a174d","year":2016},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2508.11678","last_updated":"2025-08-25T15:28:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T11:27:11.275346Z","submitted_at":"2025-08-08T15:28:39Z","title":"Optimizing Peer Grading: A Systematic Literature Review of Reviewer Assignment Strategies and Quantity of Reviewers","version":2},"reference_index":37,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:46.885916Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2508.11678"},"observation_digest":"sha256:5f1b00006eece073bf33ea123ee7a542857638b0527ffec20cd19ce48847bcc2","observation_id":"5c7d25a5-7338-461d-b875-f06bed8c7c56","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:50.644984Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:34.496301+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:50.334419Z","title":"Open, collaborative, and ai-augmented peer assessment: Student participation, performance, and perceptions,","venue":null,"work_id":"96a794d4-17da-4336-9642-60b9b77d4ce1","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2508.11678","last_updated":"2025-08-25T15:28:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T11:27:11.275346Z","submitted_at":"2025-08-08T15:28:39Z","title":"Optimizing Peer Grading: A Systematic Literature Review of Reviewer Assignment Strategies and Quantity of Reviewers","version":2},"reference_index":38,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:46.942961Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2508.11678"},"observation_digest":"sha256:551544303e435d4d16b3b121b1866e71c8475f7532a66955d0d8edd07c08b36a","observation_id":"50ec7c8a-03b7-46b7-9bac-466e018d4ab2","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:50.416529Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:34.496301+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:50.083954Z","title":"Mechanical ta 2: Peer grading with ta and algorithmic support,","venue":null,"work_id":"7a9fa5cb-65b7-4562-83de-4a02308d6f4e","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2508.11678","last_updated":"2025-08-25T15:28:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T11:27:11.275346Z","submitted_at":"2025-08-08T15:28:39Z","title":"Optimizing Peer Grading: A Systematic Literature Review of Reviewer Assignment Strategies and Quantity of Reviewers","version":2},"reference_index":39,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:47.001377Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2508.11678"},"observation_digest":"sha256:fadabd20242444073cb2638dfb8d25d7e73f3beefba5b6ec5bd6d806c002243e","observation_id":"66709cb7-2b44-4105-bc94-00680eef028e","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:50.206439Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:34.496301+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:49.833932Z","title":"How effective can simple ordinal peer grading be?","venue":null,"work_id":"2c91df6e-84a1-4a6a-a23f-c598c7d50bb1","year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2508.11678","last_updated":"2025-08-25T15:28:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T11:27:11.275346Z","submitted_at":"2025-08-08T15:28:39Z","title":"Optimizing Peer Grading: A Systematic Literature Review of Reviewer Assignment Strategies and Quantity of Reviewers","version":2},"reference_index":40,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:47.077408Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2508.11678"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a427f72681d4bc51eedbfa7dd9c44636618c40185081792189c51ddcef1e3af5","observation_id":"a9b6e644-023a-4172-8008-6819e59711e8","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:49.915345Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:34.496301+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1411.4619","last_updated":"2014-11-17T20:16:38Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T23:11:18.346988Z","submitted_at":"2014-11-17T20:16:38Z","title":"Aggregating partial rankings with applications to peer grading in massive online open courses","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"1411.4619","doi":null,"metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"1411.4619","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:47.976204Z","title":"Aggregating partial rankings with applications to peer grading in massive online open courses","venue":"cs.AI","work_id":"fb9467e3-e99d-4757-b34a-8e8c190474ab","year":2014},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2508.11678","last_updated":"2025-08-25T15:28:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T11:27:11.275346Z","submitted_at":"2025-08-08T15:28:39Z","title":"Optimizing Peer Grading: A Systematic Literature Review of Reviewer Assignment Strategies and Quantity of Reviewers","version":2},"reference_index":41,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:47.138067Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/1411.4619","citing_paper":"/paper/2508.11678"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f6911f12cd438d198c69355103896d887c5fe23b06e2130140147936eb8e701c","observation_id":"b7ca6524-6982-4e6d-b3f7-1c8def1ad2ee","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:48.033555Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:34.496301+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:49.668574Z","title":"Better peer grading through bayesian inference,","venue":null,"work_id":"ee4bffb8-6bc6-40fe-a3dc-5fba3f2a20fa","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2508.11678","last_updated":"2025-08-25T15:28:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T11:27:11.275346Z","submitted_at":"2025-08-08T15:28:39Z","title":"Optimizing Peer Grading: A Systematic Literature Review of Reviewer Assignment Strategies and Quantity of Reviewers","version":2},"reference_index":42,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:47.216725Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2508.11678"},"observation_digest":"sha256:3dfa46756f5c49b343b5a4bdec24a829a1f55d861bd0d2763b90c3d0362814bd","observation_id":"aacb0d03-3ef7-4f9c-8c1e-7a1e608f03bd","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:49.782880Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:34.496301+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:49.514489Z","title":"Peer and self assessment in massive online classes,","venue":null,"work_id":"f98872ee-4e00-4bf8-a7f1-932200cbbe7f","year":2013},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2508.11678","last_updated":"2025-08-25T15:28:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T11:27:11.275346Z","submitted_at":"2025-08-08T15:28:39Z","title":"Optimizing Peer Grading: A Systematic Literature Review of Reviewer Assignment Strategies and Quantity of Reviewers","version":2},"reference_index":43,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:47.298430Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2508.11678"},"observation_digest":"sha256:8c75b6e77d260cd09f1c1c503a8598009f635922d63a4088cdfebcc029905090","observation_id":"f8cb08bd-a0d9-4894-840a-09b17144dd70","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:49.606429Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:34.496301+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:49.360917Z","title":"Peer-marking and peer-feedback for coding exercises,","venue":null,"work_id":"de3bdf71-b559-4d1a-90b9-4e2a7ea44d5e","year":2019},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2508.11678","last_updated":"2025-08-25T15:28:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T11:27:11.275346Z","submitted_at":"2025-08-08T15:28:39Z","title":"Optimizing Peer Grading: A Systematic Literature Review of Reviewer Assignment Strategies and Quantity of Reviewers","version":2},"reference_index":44,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:47.364690Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2508.11678"},"observation_digest":"sha256:4ff94f9b09092d5860a96e11bc59e65710f843a38cb4f7a8834635a064e9b25a","observation_id":"1dec2439-efb2-481d-b440-372ca9803141","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:49.447184Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:34.496301+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:49.207357Z","title":"Probabilistic graphical models for boosting cardinal and ordinal peer grading in moocs,","venue":null,"work_id":"5608be7c-f5e3-4705-8d5f-2f964ae9da2b","year":2015},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2508.11678","last_updated":"2025-08-25T15:28:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T11:27:11.275346Z","submitted_at":"2025-08-08T15:28:39Z","title":"Optimizing Peer Grading: A Systematic Literature Review of Reviewer Assignment Strategies and Quantity of Reviewers","version":2},"reference_index":45,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:47.413832Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2508.11678"},"observation_digest":"sha256:83e7d35ade9060ce59753b45c06f66899704ebb240dbb53d82e7f5ef7c2565ab","observation_id":"5ba20d5d-dbbe-4ebe-8e6e-95d0d9003e67","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:49.288710Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:34.496301+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:49.059310Z","title":"Rankwithta: A robust and accurate peer grading mechanism for moocs,","venue":null,"work_id":"2f6c86a3-44fe-48a6-8958-d157611117f3","year":2017},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2508.11678","last_updated":"2025-08-25T15:28:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T11:27:11.275346Z","submitted_at":"2025-08-08T15:28:39Z","title":"Optimizing Peer Grading: A Systematic Literature Review of Reviewer Assignment Strategies and Quantity of Reviewers","version":2},"reference_index":46,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:47.474891Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2508.11678"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f6751f9c18cefec134d75388a77c25e22f1887ec6c7137d457ec7ecea36afa2f","observation_id":"dd2bc019-5ba0-4936-944e-896541b4333b","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:49.136556Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:34.496301+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:48.897470Z","title":"Supporting peer assessment in education with conver- sational agents,","venue":null,"work_id":"688f9da7-1622-4dd6-8ab5-cd9115c68e52","year":2019},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2508.11678","last_updated":"2025-08-25T15:28:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T11:27:11.275346Z","submitted_at":"2025-08-08T15:28:39Z","title":"Optimizing Peer Grading: A Systematic Literature Review of Reviewer Assignment Strategies and Quantity of Reviewers","version":2},"reference_index":47,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:47.518748Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2508.11678"},"observation_digest":"sha256:5579a12ed1f5da0ffac57606426b6b6332994b42220b1909b38234e9e448e38a","observation_id":"946e3f28-5c89-4851-95a4-0f794e475d35","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:48.977717Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:34.496301+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:48.797864Z","title":"Vista, E","venue":null,"work_id":"5a05e50a-e54e-46b3-86cb-d42f0aed531a","year":2015},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2508.11678","last_updated":"2025-08-25T15:28:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T11:27:11.275346Z","submitted_at":"2025-08-08T15:28:39Z","title":"Optimizing Peer Grading: A Systematic Literature Review of Reviewer Assignment Strategies and Quantity of Reviewers","version":2},"reference_index":48,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:47.566911Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2508.11678"},"observation_digest":"sha256:01c7fbae5cdef73bae98f7276f6e7aefb50574c6c2198de4ad6f3737b552e150","observation_id":"a30a336d-94b4-48c6-acf2-36a068bfa072","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:48.832560Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:34.496301+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:48.668181Z","title":"Leveraging social connections to improve peer assessment in moocs,","venue":null,"work_id":"326815bf-8403-45c6-819b-7feb318dae37","year":2017},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2508.11678","last_updated":"2025-08-25T15:28:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T11:27:11.275346Z","submitted_at":"2025-08-08T15:28:39Z","title":"Optimizing Peer Grading: A Systematic Literature Review of Reviewer Assignment Strategies and Quantity of Reviewers","version":2},"reference_index":49,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:47.628708Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2508.11678"},"observation_digest":"sha256:239985c28b9f2d751523ecd51da9a36ccb47fdef76f597ea4eb2b033312c4587","observation_id":"8ab99f16-eb6e-43c0-85a9-392a4f1f013e","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:48.735137Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:34.496301+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:48.535155Z","title":"Appropriate number of raters for irt based peer assessment evaluation of programming skills,","venue":null,"work_id":"6fa38172-3c16-4cf2-bd6f-5290d07d7b43","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2508.11678","last_updated":"2025-08-25T15:28:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T11:27:11.275346Z","submitted_at":"2025-08-08T15:28:39Z","title":"Optimizing Peer Grading: A Systematic Literature Review of Reviewer Assignment Strategies and Quantity of Reviewers","version":2},"reference_index":50,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:47.685592Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2508.11678"},"observation_digest":"sha256:aeda7ef89f0289f591f223256a6e21188bb029d13723250be0a65871d8b29280","observation_id":"24306bff-6523-4fe7-8ba4-e0feb904f14a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:48.607004Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:34.496301+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:48.455579Z","title":"Methods for ordinal peer grading,","venue":null,"work_id":"24a5120a-b65a-4ed7-8315-332218553dbc","year":2014},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2508.11678","last_updated":"2025-08-25T15:28:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T11:27:11.275346Z","submitted_at":"2025-08-08T15:28:39Z","title":"Optimizing Peer Grading: A Systematic Literature Review of Reviewer Assignment Strategies and Quantity of Reviewers","version":2},"reference_index":51,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:47.794794Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2508.11678"},"observation_digest":"sha256:4554809da96fa2000170387d9d872e2fac6c052cc1b168a87df5fc142b798dc5","observation_id":"50387c0d-0f97-4404-b582-9c57c15f49b3","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:48.484058Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:34.496301+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:48.360257Z","title":"Online peer marking with aggrega- tion functions,","venue":null,"work_id":"83d65f09-54f5-42e5-9c37-96a0d88ac1d9","year":2017},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2508.11678","last_updated":"2025-08-25T15:28:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T11:27:11.275346Z","submitted_at":"2025-08-08T15:28:39Z","title":"Optimizing Peer Grading: A Systematic Literature Review of Reviewer Assignment Strategies and Quantity of Reviewers","version":2},"reference_index":52,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:47.840744Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2508.11678"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f7212915055f7d71e1375d14365f12fb730783fcc099571c0156139b93cb3428","observation_id":"5b1988fa-5364-4183-837a-c4b104dfcbd4","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:48.393171Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:34.496301+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:48.254808Z","title":"A dynamic review allocation approach for peer assess- ment in technology enhanced learning,","venue":null,"work_id":"728b9318-3edb-4da0-befd-6d9c354696e9","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2508.11678","last_updated":"2025-08-25T15:28:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T11:27:11.275346Z","submitted_at":"2025-08-08T15:28:39Z","title":"Optimizing Peer Grading: A Systematic Literature Review of Reviewer Assignment Strategies and Quantity of Reviewers","version":2},"reference_index":53,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:47.919152Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2508.11678"},"observation_digest":"sha256:95096db535fb51740f37532e8c3d417a48822162a71f4a7128ae195cb6daeede","observation_id":"7fa37285-1ee6-4736-8c27-0cc74fa337f8","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:47:48.300662Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:34.496301+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}}],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2508.11678","last_updated":"2025-08-25T15:28:50Z","latest_version":2,"primary_category":"cs.CY","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T11:27:11.275346Z","submitted_at":"2025-08-08T15:28:39Z","title":"Optimizing Peer Grading: A Systematic Literature Review of Reviewer Assignment Strategies and Quantity of Reviewers"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":53,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":1,"verified_exact":3,"verified_fuzzy":49},"total_outbound_references":53},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:34.496301+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 18 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 53 of 53 outbound references and 0 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2508.11678."}