{"as_of":"2026-08-08T03:33:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:cb9ebd244ddff2a1cb4eb85c8d61e64d0605ddcd8d6e95af3d21dbaac1852136","coverage":[{"denominator":22,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":22,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-04T10:25:56.768595Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":25,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":25,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":3,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":3,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-02T02:44:16.371761Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"arxiv_reference","source_observed_at":"2026-05-12T09:06:26.597562Z","state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2510.10002","last_updated":"2026-07-14T18:21:16Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-04T10:25:51.045268Z","submitted_at":"2025-10-11T04:06:07Z","title":"Interaction Protocol Shapes Moral Judgment in Multi-Agent Debate","version":3},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2510.10002","doi":null,"metadata_source":"arxiv_reference","pith_arxiv_id":"2510.10002","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-16T01:21:41.784474Z","title":"Deliberative dynamics and value alignment in LLM debates","venue":null,"work_id":"e227ff82-cb89-424f-8c6d-b9934a49dddd","year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2604.07007","last_updated":"2026-04-08T12:28:20Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T02:11:23.670680Z","submitted_at":"2026-04-08T12:28:20Z","title":"AgentCity: Constitutional Governance for Autonomous Agent Economies via Separation of Power","version":1},"reference_index":46,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-05-10T17:22:59.781710Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2510.10002","citing_paper":"/paper/2604.07007"},"observation_digest":"sha256:6cb695c2cabc20f07140c2459293c4fc7b24ae58b494596274944f756f989f60","observation_id":"a0045f1e-4bcb-4986-a205-7fb944f0c0df","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-16T01:21:41.784474Z","resolver_source":"arxiv_id","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2510.10002","last_updated":"2026-07-14T18:21:16Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-04T10:25:51.045268Z","submitted_at":"2025-10-11T04:06:07Z","title":"Interaction Protocol Shapes Moral Judgment in Multi-Agent Debate","version":3},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2510.10002","doi":null,"metadata_source":"arxiv_reference","pith_arxiv_id":"2510.10002","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-16T01:21:41.784474Z","title":"Deliberative dynamics and value alignment in LLM debates","venue":null,"work_id":"e227ff82-cb89-424f-8c6d-b9934a49dddd","year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2604.26561","last_updated":"2026-04-29T11:47:28Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T23:12:10.599132Z","submitted_at":"2026-04-29T11:47:28Z","title":"Preserving Disagreement: Architectural Heterogeneity and Coherence Validation in Multi-Agent Policy Simulation","version":1},"reference_index":6,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-05-07T12:50:21.666394Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2510.10002","citing_paper":"/paper/2604.26561"},"observation_digest":"sha256:395021efde9dfa85ad3d1271f16af2e0dc6ada8f560efda703524da92c7524e7","observation_id":"67476443-4c42-46fe-8cd5-5b07f245d021","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-16T01:21:41.784474Z","resolver_source":"arxiv_id","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2510.10002","last_updated":"2026-07-14T18:21:16Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-04T10:25:51.045268Z","submitted_at":"2025-10-11T04:06:07Z","title":"Interaction Protocol Shapes Moral Judgment in Multi-Agent Debate","version":3},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2510.10002","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T02:44:16.371761Z","title":"Deliberative dynamics and value alignment in llm debates.arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.10002, 2025","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.14256","last_updated":"2026-07-15T18:13:05Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T21:24:52.953909Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-15T18:13:05Z","title":"Automatic Hard Example Synthesis with Multi-Level Agentic Data Curation","version":1},"reference_index":40,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-02T02:44:16.371761Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2510.10002","citing_paper":"/paper/2607.14256"},"observation_digest":"sha256:19b4164265b2e8cae0d0dbba330a58a32a00c23f80dc687a263a99838df86d42","observation_id":"7058828b-0ee1-4b46-a2c9-16c53fc97cb7","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-02T02:44:16.371761Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}}],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2510.10002/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2510.10002/integrity","json":"/paper/2510.10002/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2510.10002"},"outbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-04T10:25:55.445979Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2510.10002","last_updated":"2026-07-14T18:21:16Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-04T10:25:51.045268Z","submitted_at":"2025-10-11T04:06:07Z","title":"Interaction Protocol Shapes Moral Judgment in Multi-Agent Debate","version":3},"reference_index":1,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-04T10:25:55.445979Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2510.10002"},"observation_digest":"sha256:0cceca94cc6c4ac5e17de537ad63e8665338b74c742c75f2d868be223f8d0a2a","observation_id":"d955e25b-73ba-43f0-adb0-d2ee97cfb697","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-04T10:25:55.445979Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-04T10:25:55.574119Z","title":"top-level","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2510.10002","last_updated":"2026-07-14T18:21:16Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-04T10:25:51.045268Z","submitted_at":"2025-10-11T04:06:07Z","title":"Interaction Protocol Shapes Moral Judgment in Multi-Agent Debate","version":3},"reference_index":2,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-04T10:25:55.574119Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2510.10002"},"observation_digest":"sha256:65fb60122210a1313ab51d6edb6c409f002835298b6d1f5620bb1cdd7e7263ca","observation_id":"c2829977-85e9-4744-9c5b-fccd45dd396b","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-04T10:25:55.574119Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2406.04214","last_updated":"2024-06-06T16:14:16Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T18:26:37.581248Z","submitted_at":"2024-06-06T16:14:16Z","title":"ValueBench: Towards Comprehensively Evaluating Value Orientations and Understanding of Large Language Models","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2406.04214","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-04T10:25:54.339185Z","title":"arXiv:2406.04214","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2510.10002","last_updated":"2026-07-14T18:21:16Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-04T10:25:51.045268Z","submitted_at":"2025-10-11T04:06:07Z","title":"Interaction Protocol Shapes Moral Judgment in Multi-Agent Debate","version":3},"reference_index":3,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-04T10:25:54.339185Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2406.04214","citing_paper":"/paper/2510.10002"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f1f4265c26cdb155c0a5b7a4853c13898df59641bfa25d1685f81bb6ce776e77","observation_id":"a4462f59-dada-465f-9c5a-ff40d52e9dc2","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-04T10:25:54.339185Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-04T10:25:55.861815Z","title":"edits” or “updates","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2510.10002","last_updated":"2026-07-14T18:21:16Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-04T10:25:51.045268Z","submitted_at":"2025-10-11T04:06:07Z","title":"Interaction Protocol Shapes Moral Judgment in Multi-Agent Debate","version":3},"reference_index":4,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-04T10:25:55.861815Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2510.10002"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a4af74d5468a969f733995a449196a00cc0e0e7d0740a15f8e71129f53d58074","observation_id":"74ae88c9-6c32-4ca5-8c2b-4310bd51ca36","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-04T10:25:55.861815Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2410.01639","last_updated":"2025-05-11T19:14:09Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T19:26:12.102947Z","submitted_at":"2024-10-02T15:09:36Z","title":"Moral Alignment for LLM Agents","version":4},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2410.01639","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-04T10:25:54.690353Z","title":"arXiv:2410.01639 [cs]","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2510.10002","last_updated":"2026-07-14T18:21:16Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-04T10:25:51.045268Z","submitted_at":"2025-10-11T04:06:07Z","title":"Interaction Protocol Shapes Moral Judgment in Multi-Agent Debate","version":3},"reference_index":5,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-04T10:25:54.690353Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2410.01639","citing_paper":"/paper/2510.10002"},"observation_digest":"sha256:2220dd5fe89f5b0296f2881e01f8371935f12e2ef7372c180f41a2bc260ee7b1","observation_id":"f121b91d-ed20-4a9c-9c8e-fffaa7801794","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-04T10:25:54.690353Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2312.04854","last_updated":"2024-07-11T07:28:56Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T16:58:43.934362Z","submitted_at":"2023-12-08T06:22:12Z","title":"Learning to Break: Knowledge-Enhanced Reasoning in Multi-Agent Debate System","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2312.04854","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-04T10:25:54.856989Z","title":"doi: 10.18653/v1/2024.findings-emnlp.962","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2510.10002","last_updated":"2026-07-14T18:21:16Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-04T10:25:51.045268Z","submitted_at":"2025-10-11T04:06:07Z","title":"Interaction Protocol Shapes Moral Judgment in Multi-Agent Debate","version":3},"reference_index":6,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-04T10:25:54.856989Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2312.04854","citing_paper":"/paper/2510.10002"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f94f1139a959b0d6042cb66892939a7b4109ab96073a17ff065848d974423393","observation_id":"9279f953-5a12-4a12-a9a6-b7628a93a43c","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-04T10:25:54.856989Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-04T10:25:55.044841Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2510.10002","last_updated":"2026-07-14T18:21:16Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-04T10:25:51.045268Z","submitted_at":"2025-10-11T04:06:07Z","title":"Interaction Protocol Shapes Moral Judgment in Multi-Agent Debate","version":3},"reference_index":7,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-04T10:25:55.044841Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2510.10002"},"observation_digest":"sha256:ceb4842a01d970db80a1209b135cc6c6df559d4061f7f2a1164b759cc3ea844a","observation_id":"6c3a7837-597c-4f89-9ef2-5caaf29281a7","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-04T10:25:55.044841Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-04T10:25:55.201187Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2510.10002","last_updated":"2026-07-14T18:21:16Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-04T10:25:51.045268Z","submitted_at":"2025-10-11T04:06:07Z","title":"Interaction Protocol Shapes Moral Judgment in Multi-Agent Debate","version":3},"reference_index":8,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-04T10:25:55.201187Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2510.10002"},"observation_digest":"sha256:3acbe96507c7f789e99548a7888af536ce1a18477d0b8f61fa7bcc6c53ec2162","observation_id":"706b9349-7589-4c73-a613-44d0540cf7b1","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-04T10:25:55.201187Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-04T10:25:55.322747Z","title":"Change-of- verdict rates (y-axis) for each model (rows) during round-robin deliberation","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2510.10002","last_updated":"2026-07-14T18:21:16Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-04T10:25:51.045268Z","submitted_at":"2025-10-11T04:06:07Z","title":"Interaction Protocol Shapes Moral Judgment in Multi-Agent Debate","version":3},"reference_index":9,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-04T10:25:55.322747Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2510.10002"},"observation_digest":"sha256:3ebb2de8f7f26da76e78c00be3393e667854ca81e3ed5ee8dfb448b229ec7450","observation_id":"216093f4-1124-4aa0-8797-9fac37afd43e","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-04T10:25:55.322747Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-04T10:25:55.734422Z","title":"We identified meta posts either by examining the username or the “flair” attached to the post","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2510.10002","last_updated":"2026-07-14T18:21:16Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-04T10:25:51.045268Z","submitted_at":"2025-10-11T04:06:07Z","title":"Interaction Protocol Shapes Moral Judgment in Multi-Agent Debate","version":3},"reference_index":12,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-04T10:25:55.734422Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2510.10002"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a8dcd060375344deeff41c8c9d87f4d21577adcf209ad9136a35e8aad1643547","observation_id":"1ab11d8b-2bab-4889-bb6f-982f177bae50","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-04T10:25:55.734422Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-04T10:25:56.056065Z","title":"NTA,” “YTA,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2510.10002","last_updated":"2026-07-14T18:21:16Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-04T10:25:51.045268Z","submitted_at":"2025-10-11T04:06:07Z","title":"Interaction Protocol Shapes Moral Judgment in Multi-Agent Debate","version":3},"reference_index":14,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-04T10:25:56.056065Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2510.10002"},"observation_digest":"sha256:110507ebab890973b3a673a2659cbb7b77864376b35126e1206bf27bf6ef8494","observation_id":"0417a3a9-fc91-4d94-8c3a-ece9caf133e3","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-04T10:25:56.056065Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-04T10:25:56.215946Z","title":"disagreement rate","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2510.10002","last_updated":"2026-07-14T18:21:16Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-04T10:25:51.045268Z","submitted_at":"2025-10-11T04:06:07Z","title":"Interaction Protocol Shapes Moral Judgment in Multi-Agent Debate","version":3},"reference_index":15,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-04T10:25:56.215946Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2510.10002"},"observation_digest":"sha256:7122f0a81c66aefbb8b3be76e5f084352ccb40e1e228d6559a85edeaa9737d0b","observation_id":"e75f6415-4568-400a-862b-7fd6a4c11c56","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-04T10:25:56.215946Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-04T10:25:56.314078Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2510.10002","last_updated":"2026-07-14T18:21:16Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-04T10:25:51.045268Z","submitted_at":"2025-10-11T04:06:07Z","title":"Interaction Protocol Shapes Moral Judgment in Multi-Agent Debate","version":3},"reference_index":16,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-04T10:25:56.314078Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2510.10002"},"observation_digest":"sha256:3e0a25a5cb97d830238c8884ca5d1a077cda590efcc3c68376c8f57740d4fd0b","observation_id":"771a9f38-8336-4f53-a5d0-ee4c8469f5a1","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-04T10:25:56.314078Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-04T10:25:56.366084Z","title":"These values consisted of clusters grouped together from a more fine-grain list of values","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2510.10002","last_updated":"2026-07-14T18:21:16Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-04T10:25:51.045268Z","submitted_at":"2025-10-11T04:06:07Z","title":"Interaction Protocol Shapes Moral Judgment in Multi-Agent Debate","version":3},"reference_index":17,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-04T10:25:56.366084Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2510.10002"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e320b5aff8a35399c1030cc2f382ef87c22aa8addd5d6fa88f9a14637d9d00ed","observation_id":"3dde4f7d-2419-4c02-8203-aeacf9a3c97a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-04T10:25:56.366084Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-04T10:25:56.431253Z","title":"We chose the subset of values deemed “moral” by at least 4 of the 5 annotators","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2510.10002","last_updated":"2026-07-14T18:21:16Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-04T10:25:51.045268Z","submitted_at":"2025-10-11T04:06:07Z","title":"Interaction Protocol Shapes Moral Judgment in Multi-Agent Debate","version":3},"reference_index":18,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-04T10:25:56.431253Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2510.10002"},"observation_digest":"sha256:fdcded96e18edc76dc787affd3427e101b98f4b228931a56d7a4f93f4388759f","observation_id":"e72f641a-a569-47b9-97d6-d50803e97879","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-04T10:25:56.431253Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-04T10:25:56.522911Z","title":"We then examined the values the consistently appeared across repetitions","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2510.10002","last_updated":"2026-07-14T18:21:16Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-04T10:25:51.045268Z","submitted_at":"2025-10-11T04:06:07Z","title":"Interaction Protocol Shapes Moral Judgment in Multi-Agent Debate","version":3},"reference_index":19,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-04T10:25:56.522911Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2510.10002"},"observation_digest":"sha256:8d942bee95c4078b35b8487a80c51939b4b3758815b3a1e210be048575c97fa3","observation_id":"b0ae4df6-e710-40ca-8873-52889c6854d2","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-04T10:25:56.522911Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-04T10:25:56.610619Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2510.10002","last_updated":"2026-07-14T18:21:16Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-04T10:25:51.045268Z","submitted_at":"2025-10-11T04:06:07Z","title":"Interaction Protocol Shapes Moral Judgment in Multi-Agent Debate","version":3},"reference_index":20,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-04T10:25:56.610619Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2510.10002"},"observation_digest":"sha256:eaa3942e36d6f88a553eceffabc069f0edc7a6c34430b99a3fabfc8f1d4b87af","observation_id":"45738ad1-b709-4cce-bbf1-4f0e44351de6","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-04T10:25:56.610619Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-04T10:25:56.699566Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2510.10002","last_updated":"2026-07-14T18:21:16Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-04T10:25:51.045268Z","submitted_at":"2025-10-11T04:06:07Z","title":"Interaction Protocol Shapes Moral Judgment in Multi-Agent Debate","version":3},"reference_index":21,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-04T10:25:56.699566Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2510.10002"},"observation_digest":"sha256:23b46a7b1b42814b1b24291d8c4598faeb28fabf64bb51b9327260896e62fdfc","observation_id":"cf86a338-5a3e-446c-b768-42f1a62929f0","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-04T10:25:56.699566Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-04T10:25:56.768595Z","title":"Am I the Asshole","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2510.10002","last_updated":"2026-07-14T18:21:16Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-04T10:25:51.045268Z","submitted_at":"2025-10-11T04:06:07Z","title":"Interaction Protocol Shapes Moral Judgment in Multi-Agent Debate","version":3},"reference_index":22,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-04T10:25:56.768595Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2510.10002"},"observation_digest":"sha256:d25a8af8016bc39e20d97cd825fc4e3a2d3f1dbdd1d7c8d31ec5ee46c8bc6fad","observation_id":"f2564e2d-0ceb-4548-9d3c-55fb56071ad2","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-04T10:25:56.768595Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2303.17548","last_updated":"2023-03-30T17:17:08Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T15:10:12.213443Z","submitted_at":"2023-03-30T17:17:08Z","title":"Whose Opinions Do Language Models Reflect?","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2303.17548","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-04T10:25:54.493112Z","title":"Mrinank Sharma, Meg Tong, Tomasz Korbak, David Duvenaud, Amanda Askell, Samuel R Bowman, Newton Cheng, Esin Durmus, Zac Hatfield-Dodds, Scott R Johnston, et al","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2510.10002","last_updated":"2026-07-14T18:21:16Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-04T10:25:51.045268Z","submitted_at":"2025-10-11T04:06:07Z","title":"Interaction Protocol Shapes Moral Judgment in Multi-Agent Debate","version":3},"reference_index":2023,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-04T10:25:54.493112Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2303.17548","citing_paper":"/paper/2510.10002"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c2affcf1c3f0cde17a69fefde09be4f2e1c85c3c7b02e30572fe7354ee061b5a","observation_id":"7642c75f-f6cd-46bb-af0a-42e2bdd4bbcb","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-04T10:25:54.493112Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2410.22932","last_updated":"2024-11-01T12:37:10Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T19:42:12.472869Z","submitted_at":"2024-10-30T11:38:13Z","title":"Multi-Agent Large Language Models for Conversational Task-Solving","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2410.22932","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-04T10:25:54.018632Z","title":"arXiv:2410.22932 [cs]","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2510.10002","last_updated":"2026-07-14T18:21:16Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-04T10:25:51.045268Z","submitted_at":"2025-10-11T04:06:07Z","title":"Interaction Protocol Shapes Moral Judgment in Multi-Agent Debate","version":3},"reference_index":2024,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-04T10:25:54.018632Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2410.22932","citing_paper":"/paper/2510.10002"},"observation_digest":"sha256:86607455c0ed9d7eac0317a65395a1be150e2f7b2765f315268d1bb6295b64ab","observation_id":"7d915d8d-9098-4856-bb90-0a17073de95e","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-04T10:25:54.018632Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-04T10:25:54.143506Z","title":"ISBN 979-8-89176-251-0","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2510.10002","last_updated":"2026-07-14T18:21:16Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-04T10:25:51.045268Z","submitted_at":"2025-10-11T04:06:07Z","title":"Interaction Protocol Shapes Moral Judgment in Multi-Agent Debate","version":3},"reference_index":2025,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-04T10:25:54.143506Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2510.10002"},"observation_digest":"sha256:5b31060825af7579700f79d2469fc0b31df529d6d67e03e01ceababf186cb413","observation_id":"22ee607a-18d1-42f0-ac5f-aaf29e7febc8","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-04T10:25:54.143506Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"malformed_identifier"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}}],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2510.10002","last_updated":"2026-07-14T18:21:16Z","latest_version":3,"primary_category":"cs.AI","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-04T10:25:51.045268Z","submitted_at":"2025-10-11T04:06:07Z","title":"Interaction Protocol Shapes Moral Judgment in Multi-Agent Debate"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":22,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":1,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":21,"verified_exact":0,"verified_fuzzy":0},"total_outbound_references":22},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 8 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 22 of 22 outbound references and 3 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2510.10002."}