pith. sign in

arxiv: 2511.12813 · v1 · submitted 2025-11-16 · ❄️ cond-mat.soft

Entropic alignment of topologically modified ring polymers in cylindrical confinement

Sanjay Bhandarkar , Debarshi Mitra , J\"urgen Horbach , Apratim Chatterji This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-17 21:27 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.soft
keywords ring polymerscylindrical confinemententropic repulsionpolymer topologyorientational orderinginternal loopsbacterial chromosome
0
0 comments X

The pith

Asymmetric internal loops in ring polymers induce entropic alignment and axial orientation under cylindrical confinement.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Ring polymers confined in a narrow cylinder can be topologically modified by adding two internal loops of unequal size. This asymmetry causes the loops to repel each other entropically, pushing the polymers into opposite halves of the cylinder while also aligning them along the long axis. The resulting spatial and orientational order resembles Ising-spin interactions but arises entirely from entropy with no enthalpic contribution. The effect is demonstrated in a bead-spring model with only repulsive interactions and is supported by free-energy calculations. The same principles are proposed as a way to understand loop-driven organization inside bacterial chromosomes.

Core claim

By creating internal loops of two different sizes within ring polymers, the resulting topological asymmetry produces entropic repulsions that cause neighboring polymers to occupy different halves of the confining cylinder and to re-orient preferentially along the cylinder axis, generating an effective orientational interaction that is not driven by enthalpy.

What carries the argument

Asymmetric internal loops that generate entropic repulsions between polymer segments, leading to spatial separation and axial re-orientation.

If this is right

  • Topological modifications allow segments of one polymer to be directed toward specific segments of a neighbor.
  • Adjacent polymers acquire a preferred orientation along the cylinder axis purely through entropy.
  • The same loop-asymmetry mechanism offers a route to model interactions between differently sized loops in a bacterial chromosome.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The entropic mechanism might be used to program organization in other confined polymer systems by controlling loop sizes and positions.
  • Similar principles could be explored in three-dimensional or multi-polymer assemblies to produce more complex patterns without chemical interactions.

Load-bearing premise

The observed alignment and half-cylinder occupation arise specifically from entropic repulsions between the unequal loops rather than from details of polymer length, confinement strength, or the particular bead-spring model.

What would settle it

A simulation in which the two internal loops are made equal in size; if the preferential half-cylinder occupation and axial alignment disappear, the asymmetry-driven entropic mechanism is supported.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.12813 by Apratim Chatterji, Debarshi Mitra, J\"urgen Horbach, Sanjay Bhandarkar.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (a) A schematic of a ring polymer that is topologically modified to a ‘rotated-8’ with 200 monomers in each ring, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (a) Mean density of monomers belonging to differ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: (a) Schematic of a ring polymer with N = 200. The tip of the arrows show the position of the monomers on the contour which are cross-linked such that an Arc-1-2 topology is obtained. The polymer has a big subloop (red beads) and two small subloops (black beads). (b) Probability density distribution p(z) of the center of mass (COM) of the monomers of different loops, from a pair of polymers, referred to as … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: We define the angle θ between the two vectors, one for each polymer, which joins the COM of the monomers of the big loop to the COM of the monomers of the two small loops (combined) of the same polymer. (a) Probability dis￾tribution P(cos θ). The quantity cos(θ) is the dot product of the two vectors for a particular configuration. The small asymmetry in P(cos(θ)) becomes more prominent as we de￾crease from… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The histograms show the probabilities of different [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (a) Schematic of the Arc-1-10 polymer architecture. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: (a) Probability of parallel and anti-parallel config [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: (a) Probability distribution p(z/L) of the COM of different subloops with three Arc-1-10 polymers. The three polymers are referred to as P1, P2 and P3. (b) Probabilities of observing different configurations of the three polymers along the z axis. The configurations are labeled by the position of big subloop (B) and cluster of small subloops (S) of the three polymers along the z axis from left to right. Ea… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: (a) Probability density p(z/L) along the long z axis for the COM of four Arc-1-10 polymers (N = 200) confined in a cylinder of length L = 30a and diameter Dc = 5a. The four polymers are labelled P1, P2, P3 and P4. (b) As in (a) but now for a cylinder of length L = 70a and diameter Dc = 7a, and each polymer with N = 500 monomers. (c) Schematic of the most probable (anti-parallel) configuration. free energy.… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: (a) and (b) show the relative probabilities of ‘anti [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: (a) Free energy F[Xi] in units of kBT for two ‘rotated-8’ polymers, each with N = 200 monomers, in a cylinder of length 25a. The reaction coordinate Xi is Xi = zcom, corresponding to the distance between the CoMs of particular loops (see text). Four different regions of F[Xi] are marked as R1, R2, R3 and R4, and the corresponding arrangement of the loops at these values of Xi are shown in the schematic be… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: (a) Free energy F[Xi] in units of kBT for two Arc-1-10 polymers, each with N = 200 monomers, confined in a cylinder of length L = 15a and diameter D = 5a. (b) Free energy F[Xi] for a pair of polymers, each with N = 500 monomers, confined in a cylinder of length L = 21a and diameter D = 7a. The reaction coordinate Xi is the distance between the COMs of two clusters of small loops (SL) and COMs of big loops… view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: (a) Contact probability map of two Arc-1-10 polymers with 200 monomers in each polymers confined in a cylinder [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_13.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Under high cylindrical confinement, segments of ring polymers can be localized along the long axis of the cylinder by introducing internal loops within the ring polymer. The emergent organization of the polymer segments occurs because of the entropic repulsion between internal loops. These principles were used to identify the underlying mechanism of bacterial chromosome organization. Here, we outline functional principles associated with entropic interactions, leading to specific orientations of the ring polymers relative to their neighbors in the cylindrical confinement. We achieve this by modifying the ring polymer topology by creating internal loops of two different sizes within the polymer, and thus create an asymmetry. This allows us to strategically manipulate polymer topology such that segments of a polymer face certain other segments of a neighboring polymer. The polymers therefore behave as if they are subjected to an `effective' entropic interaction reminiscent of interactions between Ising spins. But this emergent spatial and orientational organization is not enthalpy-driven. We consider a bead spring model of flexible polymers with only repulsive excluded volume interactions between the monomers. The polymers entropically repel each other and occupy different halves of the cylinder, and moreover, the adjacent polymers preferentially re-orient themselves along the axis of the cylinder. We further substantiate our observations by free energy calculations. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study of the emergence of effective orientational interactions by harnessing entropic interactions in flexible polymers. The principles elucidated here could be relevant to understand the interactions between different sized loops within a large chromosome.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript uses bead-spring molecular dynamics simulations of ring polymers with two internal loops of unequal sizes under cylindrical confinement. It claims that entropic repulsions between the asymmetric loops cause neighboring polymers to occupy opposite halves of the cylinder and to re-orient preferentially along the cylinder axis, producing an effective Ising-like orientational interaction that is purely entropic. Free-energy calculations are presented as an independent check, and the results are suggested to be relevant to bacterial chromosome organization.

Significance. If the central observations prove robust, the work demonstrates how topological asymmetry can generate emergent spatial and orientational order through entropy alone in a standard excluded-volume model. The use of purely repulsive interactions together with free-energy verification supplies a clean computational illustration of the proposed mechanism and its potential biological implications.

major comments (2)
  1. [Simulation protocol and Results] The claim that the observed half-cylinder occupation and axial re-orientation arise specifically from the size asymmetry of the internal loops (rather than from the particular contour positions of the loops or the chosen cylinder radius and polymer length) is load-bearing for the mapping to a general effective entropic Ising interaction. No tests are reported in which loop placement is randomized while the size difference is held fixed, or in which confinement strength is varied systematically; such checks are required to establish that the effect is not an artifact of the specific parameter choices listed in the simulation protocol.
  2. [Free energy calculations] Quantitative support for the orientational preference is stated to come from free-energy calculations, yet no error estimates, block-averaging details, or finite-size scaling analysis are provided. Without these, it is not possible to judge whether the reported preference is statistically significant or sensitive to the number of beads and the precise confinement strength.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract and introduction would benefit from a concise statement of the precise loop-size ratio and the cylinder-to-polymer length ratio used in the primary simulations.
  2. [Methods] A short methods subsection or supplementary note listing all bead-spring parameters (spring constant, repulsion strength, integration timestep) would improve reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comments, which have helped us strengthen the presentation of our results. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions made to the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Simulation protocol and Results] The claim that the observed half-cylinder occupation and axial re-orientation arise specifically from the size asymmetry of the internal loops (rather than from the particular contour positions of the loops or the chosen cylinder radius and polymer length) is load-bearing for the mapping to a general effective entropic Ising interaction. No tests are reported in which loop placement is randomized while the size difference is held fixed, or in which confinement strength is varied systematically; such checks are required to establish that the effect is not an artifact of the specific parameter choices listed in the simulation protocol.

    Authors: We agree that demonstrating robustness to loop placement and confinement parameters is important for establishing the generality of the effective entropic interaction. Our original simulations employed specific contour positions chosen to produce clear asymmetry while remaining biologically plausible. To address the concern, the revised manuscript now includes additional simulations in which loop positions are randomized (with fixed size difference) and in which cylinder radius is varied systematically. These new results confirm that the half-cylinder occupation and axial re-orientation persist, indicating that the effect originates from the topological size asymmetry rather than the particular parameter choices. The new data and analysis have been added to the Results and Methods sections. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Free energy calculations] Quantitative support for the orientational preference is stated to come from free-energy calculations, yet no error estimates, block-averaging details, or finite-size scaling analysis are provided. Without these, it is not possible to judge whether the reported preference is statistically significant or sensitive to the number of beads and the precise confinement strength.

    Authors: We concur that quantitative error analysis is necessary to evaluate the reliability of the free-energy results. In the revised manuscript we have added a detailed description of the block-averaging procedure employed, together with error estimates derived from multiple independent runs. We have also performed checks by varying the number of beads and confinement strength; the orientational preference remains statistically significant across these variations. These additions are now included in the relevant section describing the free-energy calculations. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; observations emerge directly from simulations

full rationale

The paper reports results from molecular dynamics simulations of a bead-spring model with purely repulsive excluded-volume interactions. Ring polymers are topologically modified by inserting internal loops of two different sizes to create asymmetry, leading to observed half-cylinder occupation and axial re-orientation via entropic repulsions. These behaviors are directly measured in the simulations and independently substantiated by free energy calculations. No analytical derivation chain, self-referential definitions, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations are present that would reduce the claimed effective Ising-like interactions to inputs by construction. The emergent organization arises from the dynamics of the excluded-volume model under confinement rather than being tautological.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a standard bead-spring polymer model with repulsive interactions and the assumption that high cylindrical confinement localizes loop effects; no new particles or forces are introduced, and loop sizes appear chosen by hand to induce asymmetry rather than fitted to match external data.

free parameters (2)
  • internal loop sizes
    Two different sizes selected to break symmetry and create directional preference between neighboring polymers.
  • cylinder radius and polymer length
    Parameters set to achieve the high-confinement regime where loop localization occurs.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Bead-spring chains interact only via repulsive excluded-volume forces with no attractive terms.
    Standard modeling choice for flexible polymers to isolate entropic contributions.
  • domain assumption Internal loops localize polymer segments along the cylinder axis under high confinement.
    Invoked to explain how loop-loop repulsions produce spatial and orientational order.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5571 in / 1567 out tokens · 59252 ms · 2026-05-17T21:27:35.102589+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/BranchSelection.lean branch_selection unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    This allows us to strategically manipulate polymer topology such that segments of a polymer face certain other segments of a neighboring polymer. The polymers therefore behave as if they are subjected to an 'effective' entropic interaction reminiscent of interactions between Ising spins. But this emergent spatial and orientational organization is not enthalpy-driven.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

71 extracted references · 71 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Entropy as the driver of chromosome segregation.Nature Reviews Microbiol- ogy, 8(8):600–607, August 2010

    Suckjoon Jun and Andrew Wright. Entropy as the driver of chromosome segregation.Nature Reviews Microbiol- ogy, 8(8):600–607, August 2010. 17

    work page 2010

  2. [2]

    Confined space and effective interactions of multiple self-avoiding chains.Physical Review Letters, 98(12), March 2007

    Suckjoon Jun, Axel Arnold, and Bae-Yeun Ha. Confined space and effective interactions of multiple self-avoiding chains.Physical Review Letters, 98(12), March 2007

    work page 2007

  3. [3]

    Polymer architecture orchestrates the segregation and spatial organization of replicating e

    Debarshi Mitra, Shreerang Pande, and Apratim Chat- terji. Polymer architecture orchestrates the segregation and spatial organization of replicating e. coli chromo- somes in slow growth.Soft Matter, 18:5615–5631, 2022

    work page 2022

  4. [4]

    Pelletier, K

    J. Pelletier, K. Halvorsen, B.-Y. Ha, R. Paparcone, S. J. Sandler, C. L. Woldringh, W. P. Wong, and S. Jun. Phys- ical manipulation of the escherichia coli chromosome re- veals its soft nature.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(40):E2649–E2656, September 2012

    work page 2012

  5. [5]

    Le, and Michael T

    Anjana Badrinarayanan, Tung B.K. Le, and Michael T. Laub. Bacterial chromosome organization and segrega- tion.Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology, 31(1):171–199, November 2015

    work page 2015

  6. [6]

    Woldringh

    Conrad L. Woldringh. Compaction and segregation of dna in escherichia coli.Life, 14(6):660, May 2024

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    Jun and B

    S. Jun and B. Mulder. Entropy-driven spatial organiza- tion of highly confined polymers: Lessons for the bacte- rial chromosome.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103(33):12388–12393, August 2006

    work page 2006

  8. [8]

    Time scale of entropic segregation of flexible polymers in confinement: Implica- tions for chromosome segregation in filamentous bacteria

    Axel Arnold and Suckjoon Jun. Time scale of entropic segregation of flexible polymers in confinement: Implica- tions for chromosome segregation in filamentous bacteria. Physical Review E, 76(3), September 2007

    work page 2007

  9. [9]

    Unexpected relaxation dynamics of a self-avoiding polymer in cylindrical confinement.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 127(16), October 2007

    Axel Arnold, Behnaz Bozorgui, Daan Frenkel, Bae-Yeun Ha, and Suckjoon Jun. Unexpected relaxation dynamics of a self-avoiding polymer in cylindrical confinement.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 127(16), October 2007

    work page 2007

  10. [10]

    Thirumalai, and Bae-Yeun Ha

    Suckjoon Jun, D. Thirumalai, and Bae-Yeun Ha. Com- pression and stretching of a self-avoiding chain in cylin- drical nanopores.Physical Review Letters, 101(13), September 2008

    work page 2008

  11. [11]

    Self- avoiding polymer trapped inside a cylindrical pore: Flory free energy and unexpected dynamics.Physical Review E, 79(6), June 2009

    Youngkyun Jung, Suckjoon Jun, and Bae-Yeun Ha. Self- avoiding polymer trapped inside a cylindrical pore: Flory free energy and unexpected dynamics.Physical Review E, 79(6), June 2009

    work page 2009

  12. [12]

    Overlapping two self-avoiding polymers in a closed cylindrical pore: Im- plications for chromosome segregation in a bacterial cell

    Youngkyun Jung and Bae-Yeun Ha. Overlapping two self-avoiding polymers in a closed cylindrical pore: Im- plications for chromosome segregation in a bacterial cell. Physical Review E, 82(5), November 2010

    work page 2010

  13. [13]

    Ring polymers as model bacterial chromosomes: confinement, chain topology, single chain statistics, and how they interact

    Youngkyun Jung, Chanil Jeon, Juin Kim, Hawoong Jeong, Suckjoon Jun, and Bae-Yeun Ha. Ring polymers as model bacterial chromosomes: confinement, chain topology, single chain statistics, and how they interact. Soft Matter, 8:2095–2102, 2012

    work page 2095

  14. [14]

    Intrachain ordering and segregation of poly- mers under confinement.Macromolecules, 45(7):3256– 3262, March 2012

    Youngkyun Jung, Juin Kim, Suckjoon Jun, and Bae- Yeun Ha. Intrachain ordering and segregation of poly- mers under confinement.Macromolecules, 45(7):3256– 3262, March 2012

    work page 2012

  15. [15]

    Topology-driven spatial organization of ring poly- mers under confinement.Phys

    Debarshi Mitra, Shreerang Pande, and Apratim Chat- terji. Topology-driven spatial organization of ring poly- mers under confinement.Phys. Rev. E, 106:054502, Nov 2022

    work page 2022

  16. [16]

    Broedersz

    Janni Harju and Chase P. Broedersz. Physical models of bacterial chromosomes.Molecular Microbiology, April 2024

    work page 2024

  17. [17]

    Janni Harju, Muriel C. F. van Teeseling, and Chase P. Broedersz. Loop-extruders alter bacterial chromosome topology to direct entropic forces for segregation.Nature Communications, 15(1), May 2024

    work page 2024

  18. [18]

    Sherratt

    Jarno M¨ akel¨ a and David J. Sherratt. Organization of the escherichia coli chromosome by a MukBEF axial core. Molecular Cell, 78(2):250–260.e5, April 2020

    work page 2020

  19. [20]

    Muthukumar

    Kleanthes Koniaris and M. Muthukumar. Self- entanglement in ring polymers.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 95(4):2873–2881, August 1991

    work page 1991

  20. [21]

    Muthukumar

    Kleanthes Koniaris and M. Muthukumar. Knot- tedness in ring polymers.Physical Review Letters, 66(17):2211–2214, April 1991

    work page 1991

  21. [22]

    Dommersnes, Yacov Kantor, and Mehran Kar- dar

    Paul G. Dommersnes, Yacov Kantor, and Mehran Kar- dar. Knots in charged polymers.Physical Review E, 66(3), September 2002

    work page 2002

  22. [23]

    In- tricate knots in proteins: Function and evolution.PLoS Computational Biology, 2(9):e122, September 2006

    Peter Virnau, Leonid A Mirny, and Mehran Kardar. In- tricate knots in proteins: Function and evolution.PLoS Computational Biology, 2(9):e122, September 2006

    work page 2006

  23. [24]

    Knots in globule and coil phases of a model polyethy- lene.Journal of the American Chemical Society, 127(43):15102–15106, October 2005

    Peter Virnau, Yacov Kantor, and Mehran Kardar. Knots in globule and coil phases of a model polyethy- lene.Journal of the American Chemical Society, 127(43):15102–15106, October 2005

    work page 2005

  24. [25]

    Polymers with spatial or topological constraints: Theoretical and computational results.Physics Reports, 504(1):1–73, July 2011

    Cristian Micheletti, Davide Marenduzzo, and Enzo Or- landini. Polymers with spatial or topological constraints: Theoretical and computational results.Physics Reports, 504(1):1–73, July 2011

    work page 2011

  25. [26]

    Brackley, Stephen Taylor, Argyris Papanto- nis, Peter R

    Chris A. Brackley, Stephen Taylor, Argyris Papanto- nis, Peter R. Cook, and Davide Marenduzzo. Nonspe- cific bridging-induced attraction drives clustering of dna- binding proteins and genome organization.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(38), September 2013

    work page 2013

  26. [27]

    Entropy-driven genome organization

    Davide Marenduzzo, Cristian Micheletti, Peter R Cook, and Sir William. Entropy-driven genome organization. Biophysical Journal, 2006

    work page 2006

  27. [28]

    Simplifying topological entanglements by entropic competition of slip-links.Physical Review Re- search, 3(4), October 2021

    Andrea Bonato, Davide Marenduzzo, and Davide Michieletto. Simplifying topological entanglements by entropic competition of slip-links.Physical Review Re- search, 3(4), October 2021

    work page 2021

  28. [29]

    Alexander, Agnese Bar- bensi, Dorothy Buck, Julyan H.E

    Luca Tubiana, Gareth P. Alexander, Agnese Bar- bensi, Dorothy Buck, Julyan H.E. Cartwright, Ma- teusz Chwastyk, Marek Cieplak, Ivan Coluzza, Simon ˇCopar, David J. Craik, Marco Di Stefano, Ralf Ever- aers, Patr´ ıcia F.N. Fa´ ısca, Franco Ferrari, Achille Gi- acometti, Dimos Goundaroulis, Ellinor Haglund, Ya- Ming Hou, Nevena Ilieva, Sophie E. Jackson, Al...

    work page 2024

  29. [30]

    Understand- ing the role of dna topology in target search dynam- ics of proteins.The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 121(40):9372–9381, October 2017

    Anupam Mondal and Arnab Bhattacherjee. Understand- ing the role of dna topology in target search dynam- ics of proteins.The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 121(40):9372–9381, October 2017. 18

    work page 2017

  30. [31]

    Polson and Deanna R.-M

    James M. Polson and Deanna R.-M. Kerry. Segre- gation of polymers under cylindrical confinement: ef- fects of polymer topology and crowding.Soft Matter, 14(30):6360–6373, 2018

    work page 2018

  31. [32]

    Heermann

    Andreas Hofmann and Dieter W. Heermann. The role of loops on the order of eukaryotes and prokaryotes.FEBS Letters, 589(20PartA):2958–2965, April 2015

    work page 2015

  32. [33]

    Fluidification of entangled polymers by loop extrusion.Physical Review Research, 6(3), August 2024

    Filippo Conforto, Yair Gutierrez Fosado, and Davide Michieletto. Fluidification of entangled polymers by loop extrusion.Physical Review Research, 6(3), August 2024

    work page 2024

  33. [34]

    Sumitabha Brahmachari and John F. Marko. Chromo- some disentanglement driven via optimal compaction of loop-extruded brush structures.Proceedings of the Na- tional Academy of Sciences, 116(50):24956–24965, 2019

    work page 2019

  34. [35]

    Spatial and temporal organization of chromatin at small and large scales.Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics, 14(1):193–210, March 2023

    Helmut Schiessel. Spatial and temporal organization of chromatin at small and large scales.Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics, 14(1):193–210, March 2023

    work page 2023

  35. [36]

    Self-organised seg- regation of bacterial chromosomal origins.eLife, 8, Au- gust 2019

    Andreas Hofmann, Jarno M¨ akel¨ a, David J Sherratt, Di- eter Heermann, and Se´ an M Murray. Self-organised seg- regation of bacterial chromosomal origins.eLife, 8, Au- gust 2019

    work page 2019

  36. [37]

    Polovnikov, Hugo B

    Kirill E. Polovnikov, Hugo B. Brand˜ ao, Sergey Belan, Bogdan Slavov, Maxim Imakaev, and Leonid A. Mirny. Crumpled polymer with loops recapitulates key features of chromosome organization.Physical Review X, 13, 2023

    work page 2023

  37. [38]

    Haddad, D

    N. Haddad, D. Jost, and C. Vaillant. Perspectives: using polymer modeling to understand the formation and func- tion of nuclear compartments.Chromosome Research, 25(1):35–50, January 2017

    work page 2017

  38. [39]

    Dario D’Asaro, Maxime M. C. Tortora, C´ edric Vaillant, Jean-Michel Arbona, and Daniel Jost. Dna replication and polymer chain duplication reshape the genome in space and time.bioRxiv, March 2024

    work page 2024

  39. [40]

    4d nucleome modeling.Cur- rent Opinion in Genetics & Development, 67:25–32, April 2021

    Marco Di Stefano, Jonas Paulsen, Daniel Jost, and Marc A Marti-Renom. 4d nucleome modeling.Cur- rent Opinion in Genetics & Development, 67:25–32, April 2021

    work page 2021

  40. [41]

    Sougata Guha and Mithun K. Mitra. Multivalent binding proteins can drive collapse and reswelling of chromatin in confinement.Soft Matter, 19:153–163, 2023

    work page 2023

  41. [42]

    Mitra, and Ranjith Padin- hateeri

    Sangram Kadam, Kiran Kumari, Vinoth Manivannan, Shuvadip Dutta, Mithun K. Mitra, and Ranjith Padin- hateeri. Predicting scale-dependent chromatin polymer properties from systematic coarse-graining.Nature Com- munications, 14(1), July 2023

    work page 2023

  42. [43]

    Tejal Agarwal, G. P. Manjunath, Farhat Habib, and Apratim Chatterji. Origin of spatial organization of DNA-polymer in bacterial chromosomes.EPL (Euro- physics Letters), 121(1):18004, January 2018

    work page 2018

  43. [44]

    Tejal Agarwal, G. P. Manjunath, Farhat Habib, and Apratim Chatterji. Bacterial chromosome organization. i. crucial role of release of topological constraints and molecular crowders.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 150(14):144908, April 2019

    work page 2019

  44. [45]

    Tejal Agarwal, G. P. Manjunath, Farhat Habib, and Apratim Chatterji. Bacterial chromosome organization. II. few special cross-links, cell confinement, and molecular crowders play the pivotal roles.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 150(14):144909, April 2019

    work page 2019

  45. [46]

    Mix- ing and segregation of ring polymers: spatial confinement and molecular crowding effects.New Journal of Physics, 16(5):053047, May 2014

    Jaeoh Shin, Andrey G Cherstvy, and Ralf Metzler. Mix- ing and segregation of ring polymers: spatial confinement and molecular crowding effects.New Journal of Physics, 16(5):053047, May 2014

    work page 2014

  46. [47]

    Cherstvy, and Ralf Metzler

    Jaeoh Shin, Andrey G. Cherstvy, and Ralf Metzler. Poly- mer looping is controlled by macromolecular crowding, spatial confinement, and chain stiffness.ACS Macro Let- ters, 4(2):202–206, January 2015

    work page 2015

  47. [48]

    Induction of entropic segregation: the first step is the hardest.Soft Matter, 10(31):5836–5841, 2014

    Elena Minina and Axel Arnold. Induction of entropic segregation: the first step is the hardest.Soft Matter, 10(31):5836–5841, 2014

    work page 2014

  48. [49]

    Entropic segregation of ring polymers in cylindrical confinement.Macro- molecules, 48(14):4998–5005, July 2015

    Elena Minina and Axel Arnold. Entropic segregation of ring polymers in cylindrical confinement.Macro- molecules, 48(14):4998–5005, July 2015

    work page 2015

  49. [50]

    Halverson, Jan Smrek, Kurt Kremer, and Alexander Y

    Jonathan D. Halverson, Jan Smrek, Kurt Kremer, and Alexander Y. Grosberg. From a melt of rings to chromo- some territories: The role of topological constraints in genome folding, 2 2014

    work page 2014

  50. [51]

    Halverson, Won Bo Lee, Gary S

    Jonathan D. Halverson, Won Bo Lee, Gary S. Grest, Alexander Y. Grosberg, and Kurt Kremer. Molecular dynamics simulation study of nonconcatenated ring poly- mers in a melt. i. statics.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 134(20), May 2011

    work page 2011

  51. [52]

    Halverson, Won Bo Lee, Gary S

    Jonathan D. Halverson, Won Bo Lee, Gary S. Grest, Alexander Y. Grosberg, and Kurt Kremer. Molecular dynamics simulation study of nonconcatenated ring poly- mers in a melt. ii. dynamics.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 134(20), May 2011

    work page 2011

  52. [53]

    Topological tuning of dna mobility in entangled solutions of supercoiled plas- mids, 2021

    Jan Smrek, Jonathan Garamella, Rae Robertson- Anderson, and Davide Michieletto. Topological tuning of dna mobility in entangled solutions of supercoiled plas- mids, 2021

    work page 2021

  53. [54]

    Understanding the dynamics of rings in the melt in terms of the an- nealed tree model.Journal of Physics: Condensed Mat- ter, 27(6):064117, January 2015

    Jan Smrek and Alexander Y Grosberg. Understanding the dynamics of rings in the melt in terms of the an- nealed tree model.Journal of Physics: Condensed Mat- ter, 27(6):064117, January 2015

    work page 2015

  54. [55]

    Regan, De- jie Kong, Gregory B

    Yuecheng Zhou, Kai-Wen Hsiao, Kathryn E. Regan, De- jie Kong, Gregory B. McKenna, Rae M. Robertson- Anderson, and Charles M. Schroeder. Effect of molecular architecture on ring polymer dynamics in semidilute lin- ear polymer solutions.Nature Communications, 10(1), April 2019

    work page 2019

  55. [56]

    Statistics of polymer rings in the melt: a numeri- cal simulation study.Physical Biology, 6(2):025013, July 2009

    Thomas Vettorel, Alexander Y Grosberg, and Kurt Kre- mer. Statistics of polymer rings in the melt: a numeri- cal simulation study.Physical Biology, 6(2):025013, July 2009

    work page 2009

  56. [57]

    feynman test

    Raoul D. Schram, Angelo Rosa, and Ralf Everaers. Local loop opening in untangled ring polymer melts: a detailed “feynman test” of models for the large scale structure. Soft Matter, 15(11):2418–2429, 2019

    work page 2019

  57. [58]

    Conformational statis- tics of randomly branching double-folded ring polymers

    Angelo Rosa and Ralf Everaers. Conformational statis- tics of randomly branching double-folded ring polymers. The European Physical Journal E, 42(1), January 2019

    work page 2019

  58. [59]

    Elsevier, 2018

    Daniel Jost, Angelo Rosa, C´ edric Vaillant, and Ralf Everaers.A Polymer Physics View on Universal and Sequence-Specific Aspects of Chromosome Folding, page 149–169. Elsevier, 2018

    work page 2018

  59. [60]

    Structure and dynamics of interphase chromosomes.PLoS Computational Biol- ogy, 4, 2008

    Angelo Rosa and Ralf Everaers. Structure and dynamics of interphase chromosomes.PLoS Computational Biol- ogy, 4, 2008

    work page 2008

  60. [61]

    Becker, and Ralf Everaers

    Angelo Rosa, Nils B. Becker, and Ralf Everaers. Looping probabilities in model interphase chromosomes.Biophys- ical Journal, 98:2410–2419, 6 2010

    work page 2010

  61. [62]

    Ravi Prakash

    Aritra Santra and J. Ravi Prakash. Universality of di- lute solutions of ring polymers in the thermal crossover region between theta and athermal solvents.Journal of Rheology, 66(4):775–792, June 2022. 19

    work page 2022

  62. [63]

    Moreno, and Christos N

    Arturo Narros, Angel J. Moreno, and Christos N. Likos. Influence of topology on effective potentials: Coarse- graining ring polymers.Soft Matter, 6:2435–2441, 6 2010

    work page 2010

  63. [64]

    Multi-blob coarse graining for ring polymer solutions.Soft Matter, 10:9587–9758, 2014

    Arturo Narros, Christos N Likos, Angel J Moreno, and Barbara Capone. Multi-blob coarse graining for ring polymer solutions.Soft Matter, 10:9587–9758, 2014

    work page 2014

  64. [65]

    Iurii Chubak, Emanuele Locatelli, and Christos N. Likos. Ring polymers are much stronger depleting agents than linear ones.Molecular Physics, 116(21–22):2911–2926, July 2018

    work page 2018

  65. [66]

    Likos, and Sergei A

    Iurii Chubak, Christos N. Likos, and Sergei A. Egorov. Multiscale approaches for confined ring poly- mer solutions.The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 125(18):4910–4923, May 2021

    work page 2021

  66. [67]

    A. P. Thompson, H. M. Aktulga, R. Berger, D. S. Bolin- tineanu, W. M. Brown, P. S. Crozier, P. J. in ’t Veld, A. Kohlmeyer, S. G. Moore, T. D. Nguyen, R. Shan, M. J. Stevens, J. Tranchida, C. Trott, and S. J. Plimpton. LAMMPS - a flexible simulation tool for particle-based materials modeling at the atomic, meso, and continuum scales.Comp. Phys. Comm., 271...

    work page 2022

  67. [68]

    Moreno, and Christos N

    Arturo Narros, Angel J. Moreno, and Christos N. Likos. Architecture-induced size asymmetry and effective inter- actions of ring polymers: Simulation and theory.Macro- molecules, 46(23):9437–9445, November 2013

    work page 2013

  68. [69]

    van Berkum, Louise Williams, Maxim Imakaev, Tobias Ragoczy, Agnes Telling, Ido Amit, Bryan R

    Erez Lieberman-Aiden, Nynke L. van Berkum, Louise Williams, Maxim Imakaev, Tobias Ragoczy, Agnes Telling, Ido Amit, Bryan R. Lajoie, Peter J. Sabo, Michael O. Dorschner, Richard Sandstrom, Bradley Bernstein, M. A. Bender, Mark Groudine, Andreas Gnirke, John Stamatoyannopoulos, Leonid A. Mirny, Eric S. Lander, and Job Dekker. Comprehensive map- ping of lon...

    work page 2009

  69. [70]

    Effect of contact inhibition locomotion on con- fined cellular organization.Scientific Reports, 13(1), De- cember 2023

    Harshal Potdar, Ignacio Pagonabarraga, and Sudipto Muhuri. Effect of contact inhibition locomotion on con- fined cellular organization.Scientific Reports, 13(1), De- cember 2023

    work page 2023

  70. [71]

    Entropic organization of topologically modified ring polymers in spherical confinement

    Kingkini Roychoudhury, Shreerang Pande, Indrakanty S. Shashank, Debarshi Mitra, and Apratim Chatterji. En- tropic organization of topologically modified ring poly- mers in spherical confinement, arxiv 2501.02276. 2025

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  71. [72]

    Topology-mediated organization of escherichia coli chromosome in fast-growth conditions.Physical Review E, 110(5), November 2024

    Shreerang Pande, Debarshi Mitra, and Apratim Chat- terji. Topology-mediated organization of escherichia coli chromosome in fast-growth conditions.Physical Review E, 110(5), November 2024

    work page 2024