Topological constraints on the electronic band structure of hexagonal lattice in a magnetic field

Qi Gao; Wei Chen

arxiv: 2512.21966 · v2 · submitted 2025-12-26 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall · cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Topological constraints on the electronic band structure of hexagonal lattice in a magnetic field

Qi Gao , Wei Chen This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 19:51 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.mtrl-sci

keywords hexagonal latticemagnetic fluxDirac pointsChern numbersprojective symmetrytopological constraintsband structuremagnetic translation group

0 comments

The pith

Symmetry in hexagonal lattices forces Dirac band touchings at nonzero energy when the magnetic flux is pi.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that the projective symmetries arising from the magnetic translation group on a hexagonal lattice impose specific rules on where bands can touch and what topological invariants they can carry. At a flux of pi per plaquette these rules require Dirac points to appear away from zero energy, while for other rational fluxes they limit how many Dirac points can sit at zero energy. The same symmetries further restrict the possible Chern numbers both for fully gapped isolated bands and for groups of bands that touch at Dirac points. These restrictions are shown to be qualitatively different from the better-known case of the square lattice. The results therefore supply concrete symmetry-based selection rules that any tight-binding model or real hexagonal material must obey under a uniform magnetic field.

Core claim

At pi flux the symmetry in the hexagonal lattice enforces novel Dirac band touchings at E not equal to zero, and for general rational flux it constrains the number of Dirac points at E = 0. Symmetry-imposed constraints also apply to the Chern numbers of both isolated gapped bands and band multiplets connected by Dirac-point touchings, and these constraints differ substantially from those obtained on the square lattice.

What carries the argument

Projective representations of the magnetic translation group, which classify the allowed degeneracies and force relations among Chern numbers of connected bands.

If this is right

At pi flux, symmetry-protected Dirac points must appear at nonzero energies.
The number of zero-energy Dirac points is limited by the projective symmetry for any rational flux.
Chern numbers of isolated gapped bands are forced to satisfy symmetry-derived sum rules.
Multiplets of bands linked by Dirac points carry a total Chern number fixed by the same symmetry.
These selection rules produce band topologies unavailable on the square lattice.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The rules could be tested by applying a perpendicular field to graphene or transition-metal dichalcogenide monolayers and counting zero-energy Landau-level crossings.
The constraints imply that certain sequences of Chern insulators are forbidden in hexagonal geometries even when they are allowed on square lattices.
Including weak lattice distortions would provide a direct test of how robust the projective-symmetry constraints remain once the ideal model is relaxed.

Load-bearing premise

The lattice is perfectly hexagonal and disorder-free, so that only the magnetic translation symmetry acts and no extra terms lift the enforced degeneracies.

What would settle it

Angle-resolved photoemission or transport measurements on a clean hexagonal sample at exactly pi flux per plaquette should show band crossings at finite energy rather than only at zero energy.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.21966 by Qi Gao, Wei Chen.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: FIG. 1: Electronic bands of the hexagonal Hofstadter FIG. 2: Electronic bands of the hexagonal Hofstadter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: FIG. 1: Electronic bands of the hexagonal lattice with FIG. 3: Electronic bands of the hexagonal lattice with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3: Electronic bands of the hexagonal Hofstadter FIG. 5: Electronic bands of the hexagonal Hofstadter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

The impact of projective lattice symmetry on electronic band structures has attracted significant attention in recent years, particularly in light of growing experimental studies of two-dimensional hexagonal materials in magnetic fields. Yet, most theoretical work to date has focused on the square lattice due to its relative simplicity. In this work, we investigate the role of projective lattice symmetry in a hexagonal lattice with rational magnetic flux, emphasizing the resulting topological constraints on the electronic band structure. We show that, at pi flux, the symmetry in the hexagonal lattice enforces novel Dirac band touchings at E not equal to zero, and for general rational flux it constrains the number of Dirac points at E = 0. We further analyze the symmetry-imposed constraints on the Chern numbers of both isolated gapped bands and band multiplets connected by Dirac-point touchings. Our results demonstrate that these constraints in the hexagonal lattice differ substantially from those in the square lattice.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper uses projective representations of the magnetic translation group to derive new constraints on non-zero-energy Dirac touchings at pi flux and on Chern numbers for bands and multiplets in the hexagonal case, which are not simple copies of square-lattice results.

read the letter

The core point is that at pi flux the symmetry forces Dirac touchings away from zero energy on the hexagonal lattice, and for rational fluxes in general it limits the number of zero-energy Dirac points while imposing specific Chern-number rules on both isolated bands and multiplets linked by those points. These rules differ from the square-lattice versions in ways that follow directly from the different lattice symmetry and the projective representations of the magnetic translations. That extension is the actual new piece; the rest follows standard group-theory methods applied to the clean tight-binding Hamiltonian. The work stays within its stated scope—an ideal, disorder-free model—so the claims are internally consistent and do not rely on fitted parameters or circular definitions. The main limitation is that the derivations are not shown in detail here, and there are no accompanying numerical spectra or comparisons to known small-flux cases that would let a reader verify the counting arguments quickly. Those gaps are not fatal for a short theory note, but they do mean the paper will need a referee to check the character tables and the precise statements about multiplet Chern numbers. This is useful for anyone already working on Hofstadter spectra or topological bands in graphene-like systems who wants the hexagonal-specific constraints written down. I would send it to peer review; the central symmetry argument is standard and the hexagonal case is relevant enough that a careful check of the derivations would be worthwhile.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript analyzes the constraints imposed by projective representations of the magnetic translation group on the band structure of a tight-binding hexagonal lattice at rational magnetic flux. It claims that at π flux the symmetries enforce Dirac touchings at nonzero energy, that general rational flux restricts the number of zero-energy Dirac points, and that both isolated gapped bands and Dirac-connected multiplets obey specific Chern-number constraints that differ from the square-lattice case.

Significance. If the symmetry classification is complete, the work supplies parameter-free topological constraints that are directly relevant to graphene and other hexagonal 2D materials in magnetic fields. The emphasis on multiplet Chern numbers and the explicit contrast with the square lattice are useful additions to the literature on magnetic translation groups.

minor comments (3)

[Abstract] Abstract: replace the phrase 'E not equal to zero' with the standard mathematical notation E ≠ 0 for consistency with the rest of the manuscript.
[Results section on Chern numbers] The manuscript would benefit from a short table or explicit listing of the allowed Chern numbers for the lowest few multiplets at representative fluxes (e.g., 1/3, 1/2, 2/3) to make the constraints immediately usable by readers.
[Introduction] A brief comparison paragraph with the known square-lattice results (e.g., Hofstadter butterfly constraints) would help readers appreciate the hexagonal-specific features without requiring external references.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive summary of our manuscript and for recommending minor revision. The assessment correctly identifies the key results on projective symmetry constraints, non-zero-energy Dirac touchings at pi flux, restrictions on zero-energy Dirac points, and the distinct Chern-number rules for gapped bands and multiplets in the hexagonal lattice.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation self-contained

full rationale

The paper classifies projective representations of the magnetic translation group on the hexagonal lattice at rational flux using standard group-theoretic methods. The claimed constraints on Dirac touchings at E≠0 for π flux, number of E=0 Dirac points, and Chern numbers of gapped bands/multiplets follow directly from these symmetry classifications applied to the ideal tight-binding Hamiltonian. No self-definitional steps, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear; the results are independent of the paper's own outputs and rest on external mathematical structure.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard assumptions from magnetic translation group theory and projective representations; no free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Projective representations of the magnetic translation group on the hexagonal lattice are well-defined and can be classified by standard methods
Invoked implicitly when stating symmetry-enforced band touchings and Chern-number constraints.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5452 in / 1275 out tokens · 33020 ms · 2026-05-16T19:51:09.805837+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlexanderDuality.lean alexander_duality_circle_linking unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

projective lattice symmetry... constrains the number of Dirac points at E=0... symmetry-imposed constraints on the Chern numbers of both isolated gapped bands and band multiplets

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 50 canonical work pages

[1]

Denote the zero energy state atK 0 as|K 0⟩

for the hexagonal Hofstadter model, i.e., the hopping parameters already satisfy Eq.(24). Denote the zero energy state atK 0 as|K 0⟩. Since the magnetic translation operator ˆT2 satisfies ˆT2H(k1, k2) ˆT−1 2 =H(k 1 + 2π p q , k2),(28) ˆT2|K0⟩is also an eigenstate withE= 0 and momentum K1 = (k 0 1 + 2π p q , k0 2). By iteration, ˆT2 can generateq distinct ...

work page
[2]

(29) Each zero energy state corresponds to a Dirac point at E= 0 due to the sublattice symmetry so the sublattice and translation symmetry together result inqDirac points atE= 0

mod (2π,2π), j= 0,1,· · ·, q−1. (29) Each zero energy state corresponds to a Dirac point at E= 0 due to the sublattice symmetry so the sublattice and translation symmetry together result inqDirac points atE= 0. 4 - -2 02 - -2 0 2 2 1 0 1 2 E k1k2 (a) - -2 02 - -2 0 2 2 1 0 1 2 E k1k2 (b) FIG. 3: Electronic bands of the hexagonal Hofstadter model with q Di...

work page
[3]

Beyond the regime ||ti|q − |t j|q| ≤ |t k|q ≤ ||t i|q +|t j|q||, we only need to break theT 2 translation symmetry to gap the bands at E̸= 0

Theϕ=πcase To lift all the Dirac band touchings at the regime ||ti|q − |t j|q| ≤ |t k|q ≤ ||t i|q +|t j|q||, we need to break both theABsublattice symmetry and theT 2 translation symmetry of the primitive lattice. Beyond the regime ||ti|q − |t j|q| ≤ |t k|q ≤ ||t i|q +|t j|q||, we only need to break theT 2 translation symmetry to gap the bands at E̸= 0. T...

work page
[4]

To lift the band degeneracy in this regime, one needs to break theAB sublattice symmetry

Theϕ̸=πcase Atϕ= 2πp/qbut not equal toπ, there is no generic symmetry enforced Dirac band touchings atE̸= 0, and the Dirac band touchings atE= 0 occur only when ||ti|q − |t j|q| ≤ |t k|q ≤ ||t i|q +|t j|q||. To lift the band degeneracy in this regime, one needs to break theAB sublattice symmetry. Beyond this regime, the electronic bands are generally gapp...

work page
[5]

Dresselhaus, G

M. Dresselhaus, G. Dresselhaus, and A. Jorio,Group Theory: Application to the Physics of Condensed Matter (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2007)

work page 2007
[6]

H. C. Po, A. Vishwanath, and H. Watanabe, Nat. Commun.8(2017)

work page 2017
[7]

Z. Song, T. Zhang, Z. Fang, and C. Fang, Nat. Commun. 9, 3530 (2018)

work page 2018
[8]

C.-K. Chiu, J. C. Y. Teo, A. P. Schnyder, and S. Ryu, Rev. Mod. Phys.88, 035005 (2016)

work page 2016
[9]

C. L. Kane and E. J. Mele, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 226801 (2005)

work page 2005
[10]

C. L. Kane and E. J. Mele, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 146802 (2005)

work page 2005
[11]

Fu and C

L. Fu and C. L. Kane, Phys. Rev. B74, 195312 (2006)

work page 2006
[12]

Fu and C

L. Fu and C. L. Kane, Phys. Rev. B76, 045302 (2007)

work page 2007
[13]

Bradlyn, L

B. Bradlyn, L. Elcoro, J. Cano, M. G. Vergniory, Z. Wang, C. Felser, M. I. Aroyo, and B. A. Bernevig, Nature 547, 298 (2017)

work page 2017
[14]

Bradlyn, L

B. Bradlyn, L. Elcoro, M. G. Vergniory, J. Cano, Z. Wang, C. Felser, M. I. Aroyo, and B. A. Bernevig, Phys. Rev. B97, 035138 (2018)

work page 2018
[15]

J. Cano, B. Bradlyn, Z. Wang, L. Elcoro, M. G. Vergniory, C. Felser, M. I. Aroyo, and B. A. Bernevig, Phys. Rev. B97, 035139 (2018)

work page 2018
[16]

Elcoro, B

L. Elcoro, B. Bradlyn, Z. Wang, M. Vergniory, J. Cano, C. Felser, B. Andrei Bernevig, D. Orobengoa, G. De La Flor, and M. Aroyo, J. Appl. Cryst.50, 1457 (2017)

work page 2017
[17]

M. G. Vergniory, L. Elcoro, Z. Wang, J. Cano, C. Felser, M. I. Aroyo, B. A. Bernevig, and B. Bradlyn, Phys. Rev. E96, 023310 (2017)

work page 2017
[18]

J. Cano, B. Bradlyn, Z. Wang, L. Elcoro, M. G. Vergniory, C. Felser, M. I. Aroyo, and B. A. Bernevig, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 266401 (2018)

work page 2018
[19]

M. G. Vergniory, L. Elcoro, C. Felser, N. Regnault, B. A. Bernevig, and Z. Wang, Nature566, 480 (2019)

work page 2019
[20]

C. J. Bradley and A. P. Cracknell,The Mathematical Theory Of Symmetry In Solids: Representation theory for point groups and space groups(Oxford University Press, 2009)

work page 2009
[21]

Zak, Phys

J. Zak, Phys. Rev.134, A1602 (1964)

work page 1964
[22]

L. B. Shao, Q. Liu, R. Xiao, S. A. Yang, and Y. X. Zhao, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 076401 (2021)

work page 2021
[23]

L. Shao, Z. Chen, K. Wang, S. A. Yang, and Y. Zhao, Phys. Rev. B108, 205126 (2023)

work page 2023
[24]

Xiao and Y

R. Xiao and Y. X. Zhao, Nat. Commun.15, 3787 (2024)

work page 2024
[25]

Z. Y. Chen, Z. Zhang, S. A. Yang, and Y. X. Zhao, Nat. Commun.14, 743 (2023)

work page 2023
[26]

Z. Y. Chen, S. A. Yang, and Y. X. Zhao, Nat. Commun. 13, 2215 (2022)

work page 2022
[27]

Herzog-Arbeitman, Z.-D

J. Herzog-Arbeitman, Z.-D. Song, N. Regnault, and B. A. Bernevig, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 236804 (2020)

work page 2020
[28]

Herzog-Arbeitman, Z.-D

J. Herzog-Arbeitman, Z.-D. Song, L. Elcoro, and B. A. Bernevig, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 236601 (2023)

work page 2023
[29]

Fang and J

Y. Fang and J. Cano, Phys. Rev. B107, 245108 (2023)

work page 2023
[30]

Y. X. Zhao, Y.-X. Huang, and S. A. Yang, Phys. Rev. B 102, 161117 (2020)

work page 2020
[31]

Matsugatani, Y

A. Matsugatani, Y. Ishiguro, K. Shiozaki, and H. Watanabe, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 096601 (2018)

work page 2018
[33]

K. S. Novoselov, A. K. Geim, S. V. Morozov, D. Jiang, Y. Zhang, S. V. Dubonos, I. V. Grigorieva, and A. A. Firsov, Science306, 666 (2004)

work page 2004
[34]

Ashcroft and N

N. Ashcroft and N. Mermin,Solid State Physics, HRW international editions (Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1976). 12

work page 1976
[35]

Wang and L

J. Wang and L. H. Santos, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 236805 (2020)

work page 2020
[36]

D. R. Hofstadter, Phys. Rev. B14, 2239 (1976)

work page 1976
[37]

Wen and A

X. Wen and A. Zee, Nucl. Phys. B316, 641 (1989)

work page 1989
[38]

A. Lau, C. Ortix, and J. van den Brink, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 216805 (2015)

work page 2015
[39]

A. Das, R. K. Kaul, and G. Murthy, Phys. Rev. B101, 165416 (2020)

work page 2020
[40]

Rhim and K

J.-W. Rhim and K. Park, Phys. Rev. B86, 235411 (2012)

work page 2012
[41]

The plots and Tables in this manuscript can be produced by the code at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17773404

work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.17773404
[42]

I. Dana, Y. Avron, and J. Zak, J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys.18, L679 (1985)

work page 1985
[43]

M. V. Berry, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A392, 45 (1984)

work page 1984
[44]

Hatsugai, J

Y. Hatsugai, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.73, 2604 (2004)

work page 2004
[45]

Vanderbilt,Berry Phases in Electronic Structure Theory: Electric Polarization, Orbital Magnetization and Topological Insulators(Cambridge University Press, 2018)

D. Vanderbilt,Berry Phases in Electronic Structure Theory: Electric Polarization, Orbital Magnetization and Topological Insulators(Cambridge University Press, 2018)

work page 2018
[46]

Xiao, M.-C

D. Xiao, M.-C. Chang, and Q. Niu, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 1959 (2010)

work page 1959
[47]

Kohmoto, Phys

M. Kohmoto, Phys. Rev. B39, 11943 (1989)

work page 1989
[48]

B. A. Bernevig, inTopological Insulators and Topological Superconductors(Princeton University Press, 2013)

work page 2013
[49]

D. J. Thouless, M. Kohmoto, M. P. Nightingale, and M. den Nijs, Phys. Rev. Lett.49, 405 (1982)

work page 1982
[50]

Aidelsburger,Artificial gauge fields with ultracold atoms in optical lattices(Springer, 2015)

M. Aidelsburger,Artificial gauge fields with ultracold atoms in optical lattices(Springer, 2015)

work page 2015
[51]

C. R. Dean, L. Wang, P. Maher, C. Forsythe, F. Ghahari, Y. Gao, J. Katoch, M. Ishigami, P. Moon, M. Koshino, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, K. L. Shepard, J. Hone, and P. Kim, Nature497, 598 (2013)

work page 2013

[1] [1]

Denote the zero energy state atK 0 as|K 0⟩

for the hexagonal Hofstadter model, i.e., the hopping parameters already satisfy Eq.(24). Denote the zero energy state atK 0 as|K 0⟩. Since the magnetic translation operator ˆT2 satisfies ˆT2H(k1, k2) ˆT−1 2 =H(k 1 + 2π p q , k2),(28) ˆT2|K0⟩is also an eigenstate withE= 0 and momentum K1 = (k 0 1 + 2π p q , k0 2). By iteration, ˆT2 can generateq distinct ...

work page

[2] [2]

(29) Each zero energy state corresponds to a Dirac point at E= 0 due to the sublattice symmetry so the sublattice and translation symmetry together result inqDirac points atE= 0

mod (2π,2π), j= 0,1,· · ·, q−1. (29) Each zero energy state corresponds to a Dirac point at E= 0 due to the sublattice symmetry so the sublattice and translation symmetry together result inqDirac points atE= 0. 4 - -2 02 - -2 0 2 2 1 0 1 2 E k1k2 (a) - -2 02 - -2 0 2 2 1 0 1 2 E k1k2 (b) FIG. 3: Electronic bands of the hexagonal Hofstadter model with q Di...

work page

[3] [3]

Beyond the regime ||ti|q − |t j|q| ≤ |t k|q ≤ ||t i|q +|t j|q||, we only need to break theT 2 translation symmetry to gap the bands at E̸= 0

Theϕ=πcase To lift all the Dirac band touchings at the regime ||ti|q − |t j|q| ≤ |t k|q ≤ ||t i|q +|t j|q||, we need to break both theABsublattice symmetry and theT 2 translation symmetry of the primitive lattice. Beyond the regime ||ti|q − |t j|q| ≤ |t k|q ≤ ||t i|q +|t j|q||, we only need to break theT 2 translation symmetry to gap the bands at E̸= 0. T...

work page

[4] [4]

To lift the band degeneracy in this regime, one needs to break theAB sublattice symmetry

Theϕ̸=πcase Atϕ= 2πp/qbut not equal toπ, there is no generic symmetry enforced Dirac band touchings atE̸= 0, and the Dirac band touchings atE= 0 occur only when ||ti|q − |t j|q| ≤ |t k|q ≤ ||t i|q +|t j|q||. To lift the band degeneracy in this regime, one needs to break theAB sublattice symmetry. Beyond this regime, the electronic bands are generally gapp...

work page

[5] [5]

Dresselhaus, G

M. Dresselhaus, G. Dresselhaus, and A. Jorio,Group Theory: Application to the Physics of Condensed Matter (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2007)

work page 2007

[6] [6]

H. C. Po, A. Vishwanath, and H. Watanabe, Nat. Commun.8(2017)

work page 2017

[7] [7]

Z. Song, T. Zhang, Z. Fang, and C. Fang, Nat. Commun. 9, 3530 (2018)

work page 2018

[8] [8]

C.-K. Chiu, J. C. Y. Teo, A. P. Schnyder, and S. Ryu, Rev. Mod. Phys.88, 035005 (2016)

work page 2016

[9] [9]

C. L. Kane and E. J. Mele, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 226801 (2005)

work page 2005

[10] [10]

C. L. Kane and E. J. Mele, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 146802 (2005)

work page 2005

[11] [11]

Fu and C

L. Fu and C. L. Kane, Phys. Rev. B74, 195312 (2006)

work page 2006

[12] [12]

Fu and C

L. Fu and C. L. Kane, Phys. Rev. B76, 045302 (2007)

work page 2007

[13] [13]

Bradlyn, L

B. Bradlyn, L. Elcoro, J. Cano, M. G. Vergniory, Z. Wang, C. Felser, M. I. Aroyo, and B. A. Bernevig, Nature 547, 298 (2017)

work page 2017

[14] [14]

Bradlyn, L

B. Bradlyn, L. Elcoro, M. G. Vergniory, J. Cano, Z. Wang, C. Felser, M. I. Aroyo, and B. A. Bernevig, Phys. Rev. B97, 035138 (2018)

work page 2018

[15] [15]

J. Cano, B. Bradlyn, Z. Wang, L. Elcoro, M. G. Vergniory, C. Felser, M. I. Aroyo, and B. A. Bernevig, Phys. Rev. B97, 035139 (2018)

work page 2018

[16] [16]

Elcoro, B

L. Elcoro, B. Bradlyn, Z. Wang, M. Vergniory, J. Cano, C. Felser, B. Andrei Bernevig, D. Orobengoa, G. De La Flor, and M. Aroyo, J. Appl. Cryst.50, 1457 (2017)

work page 2017

[17] [17]

M. G. Vergniory, L. Elcoro, Z. Wang, J. Cano, C. Felser, M. I. Aroyo, B. A. Bernevig, and B. Bradlyn, Phys. Rev. E96, 023310 (2017)

work page 2017

[18] [18]

J. Cano, B. Bradlyn, Z. Wang, L. Elcoro, M. G. Vergniory, C. Felser, M. I. Aroyo, and B. A. Bernevig, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 266401 (2018)

work page 2018

[19] [19]

M. G. Vergniory, L. Elcoro, C. Felser, N. Regnault, B. A. Bernevig, and Z. Wang, Nature566, 480 (2019)

work page 2019

[20] [20]

C. J. Bradley and A. P. Cracknell,The Mathematical Theory Of Symmetry In Solids: Representation theory for point groups and space groups(Oxford University Press, 2009)

work page 2009

[21] [21]

Zak, Phys

J. Zak, Phys. Rev.134, A1602 (1964)

work page 1964

[22] [22]

L. B. Shao, Q. Liu, R. Xiao, S. A. Yang, and Y. X. Zhao, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 076401 (2021)

work page 2021

[23] [23]

L. Shao, Z. Chen, K. Wang, S. A. Yang, and Y. Zhao, Phys. Rev. B108, 205126 (2023)

work page 2023

[24] [24]

Xiao and Y

R. Xiao and Y. X. Zhao, Nat. Commun.15, 3787 (2024)

work page 2024

[25] [25]

Z. Y. Chen, Z. Zhang, S. A. Yang, and Y. X. Zhao, Nat. Commun.14, 743 (2023)

work page 2023

[26] [26]

Z. Y. Chen, S. A. Yang, and Y. X. Zhao, Nat. Commun. 13, 2215 (2022)

work page 2022

[27] [27]

Herzog-Arbeitman, Z.-D

J. Herzog-Arbeitman, Z.-D. Song, N. Regnault, and B. A. Bernevig, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 236804 (2020)

work page 2020

[28] [28]

Herzog-Arbeitman, Z.-D

J. Herzog-Arbeitman, Z.-D. Song, L. Elcoro, and B. A. Bernevig, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 236601 (2023)

work page 2023

[29] [29]

Fang and J

Y. Fang and J. Cano, Phys. Rev. B107, 245108 (2023)

work page 2023

[30] [30]

Y. X. Zhao, Y.-X. Huang, and S. A. Yang, Phys. Rev. B 102, 161117 (2020)

work page 2020

[31] [31]

Matsugatani, Y

A. Matsugatani, Y. Ishiguro, K. Shiozaki, and H. Watanabe, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 096601 (2018)

work page 2018

[32] [33]

K. S. Novoselov, A. K. Geim, S. V. Morozov, D. Jiang, Y. Zhang, S. V. Dubonos, I. V. Grigorieva, and A. A. Firsov, Science306, 666 (2004)

work page 2004

[33] [34]

Ashcroft and N

N. Ashcroft and N. Mermin,Solid State Physics, HRW international editions (Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1976). 12

work page 1976

[34] [35]

Wang and L

J. Wang and L. H. Santos, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 236805 (2020)

work page 2020

[35] [36]

D. R. Hofstadter, Phys. Rev. B14, 2239 (1976)

work page 1976

[36] [37]

Wen and A

X. Wen and A. Zee, Nucl. Phys. B316, 641 (1989)

work page 1989

[37] [38]

A. Lau, C. Ortix, and J. van den Brink, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 216805 (2015)

work page 2015

[38] [39]

A. Das, R. K. Kaul, and G. Murthy, Phys. Rev. B101, 165416 (2020)

work page 2020

[39] [40]

Rhim and K

J.-W. Rhim and K. Park, Phys. Rev. B86, 235411 (2012)

work page 2012

[40] [41]

The plots and Tables in this manuscript can be produced by the code at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17773404

work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.17773404

[41] [42]

I. Dana, Y. Avron, and J. Zak, J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys.18, L679 (1985)

work page 1985

[42] [43]

M. V. Berry, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A392, 45 (1984)

work page 1984

[43] [44]

Hatsugai, J

Y. Hatsugai, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.73, 2604 (2004)

work page 2004

[44] [45]

Vanderbilt,Berry Phases in Electronic Structure Theory: Electric Polarization, Orbital Magnetization and Topological Insulators(Cambridge University Press, 2018)

D. Vanderbilt,Berry Phases in Electronic Structure Theory: Electric Polarization, Orbital Magnetization and Topological Insulators(Cambridge University Press, 2018)

work page 2018

[45] [46]

Xiao, M.-C

D. Xiao, M.-C. Chang, and Q. Niu, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 1959 (2010)

work page 1959

[46] [47]

Kohmoto, Phys

M. Kohmoto, Phys. Rev. B39, 11943 (1989)

work page 1989

[47] [48]

B. A. Bernevig, inTopological Insulators and Topological Superconductors(Princeton University Press, 2013)

work page 2013

[48] [49]

D. J. Thouless, M. Kohmoto, M. P. Nightingale, and M. den Nijs, Phys. Rev. Lett.49, 405 (1982)

work page 1982

[49] [50]

Aidelsburger,Artificial gauge fields with ultracold atoms in optical lattices(Springer, 2015)

M. Aidelsburger,Artificial gauge fields with ultracold atoms in optical lattices(Springer, 2015)

work page 2015

[50] [51]

C. R. Dean, L. Wang, P. Maher, C. Forsythe, F. Ghahari, Y. Gao, J. Katoch, M. Ishigami, P. Moon, M. Koshino, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, K. L. Shepard, J. Hone, and P. Kim, Nature497, 598 (2013)

work page 2013