pith. sign in

arxiv: 2601.03253 · v3 · pith:MZ2GG653new · submitted 2026-01-06 · 🪐 quant-ph

Grand-Canonical Typicality

Cedric Igelspacher , Roderich Tumulka , Cornelia Vogel This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 13:02 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords grand-canonical typicalityquantum statistical mechanicsreduced density matrixmicro-canonical subspacechemical reactionsgeneralized Gibbs ensembleswave function distributionparticle number fluctuations
0
0 comments X

The pith

For a typical wave function in the generalized micro-canonical subspace of a system weakly coupled to a bath, the reduced density matrix approximates the grand-canonical ensemble with chemical potentials.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows how the grand-canonical density matrix arises as the typical reduced state of a quantum system that can exchange particles with its environment. It extends the known result for fixed particle number, called canonical typicality, to cases with variable particle numbers such as chemical reactions or particles entering and leaving a spatial region. For wave functions drawn typically from the subspace that fixes total energy in a narrow window together with the right particle-number sectors, the system's reduced density matrix is close to the grand-canonical form that includes terms for chemical potentials. The work also addresses the probability distribution over possible wave functions of the system, which follows a GAP or Scrooge measure, and covers generalized Gibbs ensembles when other quantities are conserved.

Core claim

For a typical wave function Ψ in the generalized micro-canonical subspace ℋ_gmc ⊂ ℋ^S ⊗ ℋ^B, defined by a micro-canonical interval of total energy and suitable particle number sectors, the reduced density matrix ρ̂^S_Ψ = tr^B |Ψ⟩⟨Ψ| is approximately equal to the grand-canonical density matrix ρ̂_gc = Z_gc^{-1} exp(−β(Ĥ^S − μ1 N̂1^S − … − μr N̂r^S)). This holds both for the density matrix of the subspace itself and for typical states inside it, and the conditional wave function of S follows a GAP or Scrooge measure. The same framework applies to chemical reactions and to systems defined by a spatial region, and it extends to generalized Gibbs ensembles for additional conserved macroscopic obv

What carries the argument

The generalized micro-canonical subspace ℋ_gmc, which selects states of the combined system-plus-bath by a narrow total-energy window and appropriate particle-number sectors (or other conserved quantities).

If this is right

  • The grand-canonical ensemble is justified for macroscopic quantum systems that exchange particles with their surroundings.
  • The distribution of the system's conditional wave function is given by the GAP or Scrooge measure rather than a uniform measure.
  • Generalized Gibbs ensembles arise in the same way when additional macroscopic observables are conserved.
  • The same typicality argument covers both chemical reactions and open spatial regions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The result supplies a quantum-mechanical route to thermodynamic relations that involve chemical potentials without assuming classical baths.
  • Numerical checks on small systems with particle exchange could test how quickly the approximation becomes accurate as bath size grows.

Load-bearing premise

The system S is weakly coupled to a large but finite quantum bath B, and the subspace is defined by fixing total energy in a narrow interval together with suitable particle-number sectors.

What would settle it

Compute the average reduced density matrix over many randomly chosen wave functions from the generalized micro-canonical subspace and check whether it deviates significantly from the grand-canonical form for macroscopic system size.

read the original abstract

We study how the grand-canonical density matrix arises in macroscopic quantum systems. ``Canonical typicality'' is the known statement that for a typical wave function $\Psi$ from a micro-canonical energy shell of a quantum system $S$ weakly coupled to a large but finite quantum system $B$, the reduced density matrix $\hat{\rho}^S_\Psi=\mathrm{tr}^B |\Psi\rangle\langle \Psi|$ is approximately equal to the canonical density matrix $\hat{\rho}_\mathrm{can}=Z^{-1}_\mathrm{can} \exp(-\beta \hat{H}^S)$. Here, we discuss the analogous statement and related questions for the \emph{grand-canonical} density matrix $\hat{\rho}_\mathrm{gc}=Z^{-1}_\mathrm{gc} \exp(-\beta(\hat{H}^S-\mu_1 \hat{N}_{1}^S-\ldots-\mu_r\hat{N}_{r}^S))$ with $\hat{N}_{i}^S$ the number operator for molecules of type $i$ in the system $S$. This includes (i) the case of chemical reactions (which requires some novel considerations) and (ii) that of systems $S$ defined by a spatial region which particles may enter or leave. It includes statements about how $\hat{\rho}_\mathrm{gc}$ arises from the density matrix of the appropriate (generalized micro-canonical) Hilbert subspace $\mathscr{H}_\mathrm{gmc} \subset \mathscr{H}^S \otimes \mathscr{H}^B$ (defined by a micro-canonical interval of total energy and suitable particle number sectors) or from typical $\Psi$ in $\mathscr{H}_\mathrm{gmc}$, as well as statements about the distribution of the (conditional) wave function $\psi^S$ of $S$, which turns out to be a so-called GAP or Scrooge measure. That is, we discuss the foundation and justification of both the density matrix and the distribution of the wave function in the grand-canonical case. To this end (particularly for the chemical reactions), we also need to extend these considerations to the so-called generalized Gibbs ensembles, which apply to systems for which some macroscopic observables are conserved.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper extends canonical typicality to the grand-canonical case. It claims that for a typical wave function Ψ drawn from the generalized micro-canonical subspace ℋ_gmc ⊂ ℋ^S ⊗ ℋ^B (defined by a narrow total-energy interval together with appropriate particle-number sectors), the reduced density matrix ρ̂^S_Ψ = tr^B |Ψ⟩⟨Ψ| approximates the grand-canonical ensemble ρ̂_gc = Z_gc^{-1} exp(−β(Ĥ^S − μ_1 N̂_1^S − … − μ_r N̂_r^S)). The argument covers both chemical-reaction settings and spatially open regions, derives the associated GAP/Scrooge measure for the conditional wave function ψ^S, and extends the framework to generalized Gibbs ensembles when additional macroscopic observables are conserved.

Significance. If the central derivations hold, the result supplies a typicality-based justification for the grand-canonical ensemble and its associated wave-function distribution in open quantum systems, directly building on established canonical-typicality theorems. This strengthens the microscopic foundation of statistical mechanics for systems with particle exchange and conserved quantities, with potential implications for both equilibrium and non-equilibrium descriptions.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract / definition of ℋ_gmc] Abstract and the paragraph introducing ℋ_gmc: the subspace is defined solely by a micro-canonical energy shell plus fixed particle-number sectors. Under the stated weak-coupling assumption this does not automatically guarantee non-vanishing matrix elements of the interaction Hamiltonian that change particle number; without such matrix elements the conditional wave function ψ^S remains trapped in fixed-N sectors and cannot sample the grand-canonical fluctuations required for ρ̂^S_Ψ ≈ ρ̂_gc.
  2. [spatial-region case] Discussion of the spatial-region case: the claim that typical Ψ in ℋ_gmc yield grand-canonical statistics for an open spatial subsystem S relies on particle exchange being dynamically allowed on relevant timescales. The weak-coupling limit (small interaction strength) can suppress the effective exchange rate, so that the reduced state remains close to a canonical ensemble within each N sector rather than the full grand-canonical mixture; this tension is load-bearing for the central claim but is not resolved by the subspace definition alone.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Notation for the chemical-potential terms μ_i and the number operators N̂_i^S should be introduced once and used consistently; the current abstract uses both “μ1 N̂1^S” and “μ_r N̂_r^S” without an explicit definition paragraph.
  2. [generalized Gibbs ensembles paragraph] The extension to generalized Gibbs ensembles is mentioned only briefly; a short dedicated subsection clarifying which additional conserved observables are treated would improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and for identifying points that require clarification regarding the assumptions in our treatment of grand-canonical typicality. The comments correctly note that the definition of the generalized micro-canonical subspace ℋ_gmc is kinematic and that dynamical particle exchange must be separately ensured. We address each major comment below, propose targeted revisions to improve precision, and distinguish the typicality statement from dynamical equilibration.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Abstract / definition of ℋ_gmc: the subspace is defined solely by a micro-canonical energy shell plus fixed particle-number sectors. Under the stated weak-coupling assumption this does not automatically guarantee non-vanishing matrix elements of the interaction Hamiltonian that change particle number; without such matrix elements the conditional wave function ψ^S remains trapped in fixed-N sectors and cannot sample the grand-canonical fluctuations required for ρ̂^S_Ψ ≈ ρ̂_gc.

    Authors: We agree that the definition of ℋ_gmc is purely kinematic: it is the direct sum of narrow total-energy shells over a range of particle-number sectors chosen so that the weights reproduce the grand-canonical probabilities. The central typicality claim is that a uniformly random vector Ψ ∈ ℋ_gmc has reduced density matrix ρ̂^S_Ψ close to the grand-canonical ensemble for most Ψ; this follows from the high dimensionality of the bath and the sector weights, without reference to time evolution. The weak-coupling assumption is used only to guarantee approximate additivity of energies so that the total-energy shell can be meaningfully defined. We will revise the abstract and the introductory paragraph on ℋ_gmc to state explicitly that the result is a statement about the geometry of the subspace and the uniform measure on it, and to add a short remark that dynamical equilibration to the grand-canonical ensemble additionally requires non-vanishing particle-changing matrix elements of the interaction. This clarification does not alter the mathematical content but removes the ambiguity the referee correctly identified. revision: partial

  2. Referee: Discussion of the spatial-region case: the claim that typical Ψ in ℋ_gmc yield grand-canonical statistics for an open spatial subsystem S relies on particle exchange being dynamically allowed on relevant timescales. The weak-coupling limit (small interaction strength) can suppress the effective exchange rate, so that the reduced state remains close to a canonical ensemble within each N sector rather than the full grand-canonical mixture; this tension is load-bearing for the central claim but is not resolved by the subspace definition alone.

    Authors: The referee is right that, in the spatial-region setting, the weak-coupling limit alone does not guarantee a non-zero particle-exchange rate. The manuscript’s typicality result for the reduced state of a typical Ψ ∈ ℋ_gmc is nevertheless mathematically valid because the subspace already includes the relevant N sectors; the partial trace over a random vector therefore yields the grand-canonical mixture by construction. However, reaching such a typical state dynamically does require that the interaction permit particle transfer on the timescales of interest. We will expand the spatial-region discussion to state this additional assumption explicitly and to separate the kinematic typicality statement from the dynamical conditions needed for equilibration. The revised text will note that the grand-canonical ensemble is justified once the system has equilibrated within the enlarged subspace. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in grand-canonical typicality derivation

full rationale

The paper extends established canonical typicality results to the grand-canonical ensemble by defining a generalized micro-canonical subspace ℋ_gmc via a micro-canonical energy interval plus suitable particle-number sectors, then applies standard quantum-mechanical arguments to show that typical states Ψ yield reduced density matrices approximating the grand-canonical form. No step equates the target ρ̂_gc to a fitted parameter or redefines the input subspace in terms of the output ensemble. Prior canonical-typicality citations supply independent mathematical support rather than a self-referential chain, and extensions to generalized Gibbs ensembles or GAP measures for wave-function distributions follow directly from the subspace construction without tautological reduction. The derivation remains self-contained against external benchmarks of quantum statistical mechanics.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard quantum mechanics, the definition of a generalized micro-canonical subspace, and the assumption of weak coupling to a large bath. No free parameters or new invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • standard math Standard postulates of quantum mechanics (Hilbert space, unitary evolution, partial trace).
    Invoked throughout the abstract when defining reduced density matrices and typical states.
  • domain assumption Existence of a large but finite bath B weakly coupled to S.
    Required for the reduced density matrix to approach the grand-canonical form.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5938 in / 1474 out tokens · 38468 ms · 2026-05-22T13:02:13.791205+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 66 canonical work pages · 19 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Springer, 2006

    Roger Balian.From Microphysics to Macrophysics: Methods and Applications of Statistical Physics, Volume I. Springer, 2006. Translated by D. ter Haar & J. F. Gregg

    work page 2006

  2. [2]

    Springer, 2022

    Jean Bricmont.Making Sense of Statistical Mechanics. Springer, 2022

    work page 2022

  3. [3]

    Generalized Thermalization in an Integrable Lattice System

    Amy C. Cassidy, Charles W. Clark, and Marcos Rigol. Generalized thermalization in an integrable lattice system.Physical Review Letters, 106:140405, 2011. URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/1008.4794

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  4. [4]

    The Coulomb gas at low tem- perature and low density.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 125:153–180, 1989

    Joseph Conlon, Elliott Lieb, and Horng-Tzer Yau. The Coulomb gas at low tem- perature and low density.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 125:153–180, 1989

    work page 1989

  5. [5]

    Quantum equilibrium and the origin of absolute uncertainty.Journal of Statistical Physics, 67(5–6):843–907, 1992

    Detlef D¨ urr, Sheldon Goldstein, and Nino Zangh` ı. Quantum equilibrium and the origin of absolute uncertainty.Journal of Statistical Physics, 67(5–6):843–907, 1992

    work page 1992

  6. [6]

    Quantum Thermodynamics and Canonical Typicality

    Paolo Facchi and Giancarlo Garnero. Quantum thermodynamics and canoni- cal typicality.International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics, 14(08):1740001, 2017. URL:http://arxiv.org/abs/1705.02270

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  7. [7]

    The atomic and molecular nature of matter.Revista Matem´ atica Iberoamericana, 1(1):1–44, 1985

    Charles Fefferman. The atomic and molecular nature of matter.Revista Matem´ atica Iberoamericana, 1(1):1–44, 1985

    work page 1985

  8. [8]

    Gaspard and M

    P. Gaspard and M. Nagaoka. Non-Markovian stochastic Schr¨ odinger equation. Journal of Chemical Physics, 111(13):5676–5690, 1999

    work page 1999

  9. [9]

    Gemmer and G

    J. Gemmer and G. Mahler. Distribution of local entropy in the Hilbert space of bi- partite quantum systems: origin of Jaynes’ principle.European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter, 31(2):249–257, 2003. URL:http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/ 0201136

    work page 2003

  10. [10]

    Gibbs.Elementary Principles in Statistical Mechanics

    Josiah W. Gibbs.Elementary Principles in Statistical Mechanics. Scribner’s Sons, 1902

    work page 1902

  11. [11]

    Girardeau

    M.D. Girardeau. Invariant criteria for bound states, degree of ionization, and plasma phase transition.Physical Review A, 41:6935, 1990. 39

    work page 1990

  12. [12]

    Equilibration, thermalisation, and the emergence of statistical mechanics in closed quantum systems

    Christian Gogolin and Jens Eisert. Equilibration, thermalisation, and the emer- gence of statistical mechanics in closed quantum systems.Reports on Progress in Physics, 79(5):056001, 2016. URL:http://arxiv.org/abs/1503.07538

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  13. [13]

    Individualist and ensemblist approaches to the foundations of statistical mechanics.The Monist, 102(4):439–457, 2019

    Sheldon Goldstein. Individualist and ensemblist approaches to the foundations of statistical mechanics.The Monist, 102(4):439–457, 2019

    work page 2019

  14. [14]

    Macroscopic and Microscopic Thermal Equilibrium

    Sheldon Goldstein, David A. Huse, Joel L. Lebowitz, and Roderich Tu- mulka. Macroscopic and microscopic thermal equilibrium.Annalen der Physik, 529(7):1600301, 2017. URL:http://arxiv.org/abs/1610.02312

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  15. [15]

    Lebowitz, Christian Mastrodonato, Roderich Tumulka, and Nino Zangh` ı

    Sheldon Goldstein, Joel L. Lebowitz, Christian Mastrodonato, Roderich Tumulka, and Nino Zangh` ı. Approach to thermal equilibrium of macroscopic quantum sys- tems.Physical Review E, 81:011109, 2010. URL:http://arxiv.org/abs/0911. 1724

    work page 2010

  16. [16]

    Normal Typicality and von Neumann's Quantum Ergodic Theorem

    Sheldon Goldstein, Joel L. Lebowitz, Christian Mastrodonato, Roderich Tumulka, and Nino Zangh` ı. Normal typicality and von Neumann’s quantum ergodic theorem. Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 466(2123):3203–3224, 2010. URL:http:// arxiv.org/abs/0907.0108

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  17. [17]

    Universal Probability Distribution for the Wave Function of a Quantum System Entangled with Its Environment

    Sheldon Goldstein, Joel L. Lebowitz, Christian Mastrodonato, Roderich Tumulka, and Nino Zangh` ı. Universal probability distribution for the wave function of a quantum system entangled with its environment.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 342(3):965–988, 2015. URL:http://arxiv.org/abs/1104.5482

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  18. [18]

    Canonical Typicality

    Sheldon Goldstein, Joel L. Lebowitz, Roderich Tumulka, and Nino Zangh` ı. Canoni- cal typicality.Physical Review Letters, 96:050403, 2006. URL:http://arxiv.org/ abs/cond-mat/0511091

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  19. [19]

    On the Distribution of the Wave Function for Systems in Thermal Equilibrium

    Sheldon Goldstein, Joel L. Lebowitz, Roderich Tumulka, and Nino Zangh` ı. On the distribution of the wave function for systems in thermal equilibrium.Journal of Statistical Physics, 125(5–6):1193–1221, 2006. URL:http://arxiv.org/abs/ quant-ph/0309021

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  20. [20]

    Lebowitz, Roderich Tumulka, and Nino Zangh` ı

    Sheldon Goldstein, Joel L. Lebowitz, Roderich Tumulka, and Nino Zangh` ı. Gibbs and Boltzmann entropy in classical and quantum mechanics. In V. Allori, editor, Statistical Mechanics and Scientific Explanation, pages 519–581. World Scientific,

    work page

  21. [21]

    URL:http://arxiv.org/abs/1903.11870

    work page arXiv 1903

  22. [22]

    Statistical irreversibility: Classical and quantum

    Robert Griffiths. Statistical irreversibility: Classical and quantum. In J.J. Halliwell, J. P´ erez-Mercader, and W.H. Zurek, editors,Physical Origin of Time Asymmetry, pages 147–159. Cambridge University Press, 1994

    work page 1994

  23. [23]

    Wiley, 2 edition, 1987

    Kerson Huang.Statistical Mechanics. Wiley, 2 edition, 1987. 40

    work page 1987

  24. [24]

    Pergamon Press, 1969

    Raymond Jancel.Foundations of Classical and Quantum Statistical Mechanics. Pergamon Press, 1969. Translation by W. E. Jones ofLes Fondements de la M´ ecanique Statistique Classique et Quantique, Paris: Gauthier-Villars, 1963

    work page 1969

  25. [25]

    Edwin T. Jaynes. Information theory and statistical mechanics.Physical Review, 106(4):620–630, 1957

    work page 1957

  26. [26]

    Wootters

    Richard Jozsa, Daniel Robb, and William K. Wootters. Lower bound for accessible information in quantum mechanics.Physical Review A, 49(2):668–677, 1994

    work page 1994

  27. [27]

    Cambridge University Press, 2007

    Mehran Kardar.Statistical Physics of Particles. Cambridge University Press, 2007

    work page 2007

  28. [28]

    Lam and C

    M.M. Lam and C. Dewdney. Locality and nonlocality in correlated two-particle interferometry.Physics Letters A, 150:127–135, 1990

    work page 1990

  29. [29]

    Landau and Evgeny M

    Lev D. Landau and Evgeny M. Lifshitz.Statistical Physics, Part 1. Course of Theoretical Physics, Vol. 5. Butterworth-Heinemann (Pergamon Press), 3rd edition, 1980

    work page 1980

  30. [30]

    Lebowitz

    Joel L. Lebowitz. Statistical mechanics of Coulomb systems: from electrons and nuclei to atoms and molecules. In R. Frank, A. Laptev, M. Lewin, and R. Seiringer, editors,The Physics and Mathematics of Elliot Lieb: The 90th Anniversary Volume II, pages 11–17. EMS Press, 2022. URL:http://arxiv.org/abs/2202.01760

    work page arXiv 2022

  31. [31]

    Short, and Andreas Winter

    Noah Linden, Sandu Popescu, Anthony J. Short, and Andreas Winter. Quantum mechanical evolution towards thermal equilibrium.Physical Review E, 79:061103,

    work page

  32. [32]

    URL:http://arxiv.org/abs/0812.2385

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  33. [33]

    Mark, Federica Surace, Andreas Elben, Adam L

    Daniel K. Mark, Federica Surace, Andreas Elben, Adam L. Shaw, Joonhee Choi, Gil Refael, Manuel Endres, and Soonwon Choi. A maximum entropy principle in deep thermalization and in Hilbert-space ergodicity.Physical Review X, 14:041051,

    work page

  34. [34]

    URL:http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.11970

    work page arXiv

  35. [35]

    The Scrooge ensemble in many-body quan- tum systems, 2025

    Max McGinley and Thomas Schuster. The Scrooge ensemble in many-body quan- tum systems, 2025. URL:http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.17172

    work page arXiv 2025

  36. [36]

    Nature is stingy: Universality of scrooge ensembles in quantum many-body systems, 2026

    Wai-Keong Mok, Tobias Haug, Wen Wei Ho, and John Preskill. Nature is stingy: Universality of scrooge ensembles in quantum many-body systems, 2026. Preprint. URL:http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.00266

    work page arXiv 2026

  37. [37]

    Thermalization and prethermalization in isolated quantum systems: a theoretical overview

    Takashi Mori, Tatsuhiko N Ikeda, Eriko Kaminishi, and Masahito Ueda. Thermal- ization and prethermalization in isolated quantum systems: a theoretical overview. Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics, 51(11):112001, 2018. URL:http://arxiv.org/abs/1712.08790

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  38. [38]

    Pergamon Press, 1970

    Oliver Penrose.Foundations of Statistical Mechanics: A Deductive Treatment. Pergamon Press, 1970. 41

    work page 1970

  39. [39]

    Short, and Andreas Winter

    Sandu Popescu, Anthony J. Short, and Andreas Winter. Entanglement and the foundations of statistical mechanics.Nature Physics, 2(11):754–758, 2006

    work page 2006

  40. [40]

    Foundation of Statistical Mechanics under experimentally realistic conditions

    Peter Reimann. Foundation of statistical mechanics under experimentally realistic conditions.Physical Review Letters, 101:190403, 2008. URL:http://arxiv.org/ abs/0810.3092

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  41. [41]

    Typicality of pure states randomly sampled according to the Gaus- sian adjusted projected measure.Journal of Statistical Physics, 132(5):921–935,

    Peter Reimann. Typicality of pure states randomly sampled according to the Gaus- sian adjusted projected measure.Journal of Statistical Physics, 132(5):921–935,

    work page

  42. [42]

    URL:http://arxiv.org/abs/0805.3102

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  43. [43]

    Thermalization and its mechanism for generic isolated quantum systems

    Marcos Rigol, Vanja Dunjko, and Maxim Olshanii. Thermalization and its mech- anism for generic isolated quantum systems.Nature, 452:854–858, 2008. URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/0708.1324

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  44. [44]

    Marcos Rigol, Vanja Dunjko, Vladimir Yurovsky, and Maxim Olshanii. Relaxation in a completely integrable many-body quantum system: An ab initio study of the dynamics of the highly excited states of 1d lattice hard-core bosons.Physical Review Letters, 98(5):050405, 2007. URL:http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0604476

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  45. [45]

    Vladimir A. Rokhlin. On the decomposition of a dynamical system into transitive components (in Russian).Matematicheski Sbornik, 25(2):235–249, 1949

    work page 1949

  46. [46]

    Vladimir A. Rokhlin. Selected topics from the metric theory of dynamical systems. Uspekhi Mat. Nauk, 4(2):57–128, 1949. English translation inTransl. Amer. Math. Soc. Ser. 2, 49:171–240, 1966

    work page 1949

  47. [47]

    Macroscopic Thermalization for Highly Degenerate Hamiltonians After Slight Perturbation.Journal of Statistical Physics, 192:109, 2025

    Barbara Roos, Shoki Sugimoto, Stefan Teufel, Roderich Tumulka, and Cornelia Vogel. Macroscopic Thermalization for Highly Degenerate Hamiltonians After Slight Perturbation.Journal of Statistical Physics, 192:109, 2025. URL:http: //arxiv.org/abs/2408.15832

    work page arXiv 2025

  48. [48]

    Springer, 2nd edition, 2006

    Franz Schwabl.Statistical Mechanics. Springer, 2nd edition, 2006

    work page 2006

  49. [49]

    Short and Terence C

    Anthony J. Short and Terence C. Farrelly. Quantum equilibration in finite time. New Journal of Physics, 14(1):013063, 2012. URL:http://arxiv.org/abs/1110. 5759

    work page 2012

  50. [50]

    Chaos and quantum thermalization.Physical Review E, 50:888– 901, 1994

    Mark Srednicki. Chaos and quantum thermalization.Physical Review E, 50:888– 901, 1994

    work page 1994

  51. [51]

    Does Quantum Chaos Explain Quantum Statistical Mechanics?

    Mark Srednicki. Does quantum chaos explain quantum statistical mechanics?, 1995. URL:http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/9410046

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  52. [52]

    Thermal Fluctuations in Quantized Chaotic Systems

    Mark Srednicki. Thermal fluctuations in quantized chaotic systems.Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, 29(4):L75–L79, 1996. URL:http://arxiv. org/abs/chao-dyn/9511001. 42

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  53. [53]

    Teufel, R

    Stefan Teufel, Roderich Tumulka, and Cornelia Vogel. Time evolution of typical pure states from a macroscopic Hilbert subspace.Journal of Statistical Physics, 190:69, 2023. URL:http://arxiv.org/abs/2210.10018

    work page arXiv 2023

  54. [54]

    Canonical typicality for other ensembles than micro-canonical.Annales Henri Poincar´ e, 26:1477–1518,

    Stefan Teufel, Roderich Tumulka, and Cornelia Vogel. Canonical typicality for other ensembles than micro-canonical.Annales Henri Poincar´ e, 26:1477–1518,

    work page

  55. [55]

    URL:http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.15624

    work page arXiv

  56. [56]

    Tolman.Principles of Statistical Mechanics

    Richard C. Tolman.Principles of Statistical Mechanics. Oxford University Press, 1938

    work page 1938

  57. [57]

    Lecture notes on mathematical statistical physics

    Roderich Tumulka. Lecture notes on mathematical statistical physics

    work page

  58. [58]

    URL:https://www.math.uni-tuebingen.de/de/forschung/maphy/ lehre/ss-2019/statisticalphysics/dateien/lecture-notes.pdf

    work page 2019

  59. [59]

    Thermal equilibrium distribution in infinite-dimensional Hilbert spaces.Reports on Mathematical Physics, 86(3):303–313, 2020

    Roderich Tumulka. Thermal equilibrium distribution in infinite-dimensional Hilbert spaces.Reports on Mathematical Physics, 86(3):303–313, 2020. URL:http:// arxiv.org/abs/2004.14226

    work page arXiv 2020

  60. [60]

    Smoothness of Wave Functions in Thermal Equilibrium

    Roderich Tumulka and Nino Zangh` ı. Smoothness of wave functions in thermal equilibrium.Journal of Mathematical Physics, 46(11):112104, 2005. URL:http: //arxiv.org/abs/math-ph/0509028

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  61. [61]

    Generalized Gibbs ensemble in integrable lattice models

    Lev Vidmar and Marcos Rigol. Generalized Gibbs ensemble in integrable lattice models.Journal of Statistical Mechanics, 2016:064007, 2016. URL:http://arxiv. org/abs/1604.03990

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  62. [62]

    Long-time behavior of typical pure states from thermal equilibrium ensembles.Journal of Mathematical Physics, 66:103304, 2025

    Cornelia Vogel. Long-time behavior of typical pure states from thermal equilibrium ensembles.Journal of Mathematical Physics, 66:103304, 2025. URL:http:// arxiv.org/abs/2412.16666

    work page arXiv 2025

  63. [63]

    Proof of the Ergodic Theorem and the H-Theorem in Quantum Mechanics

    John von Neumann. Beweis des Ergodensatzes und desH-Theorems in der neuen Mechanik.Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik, 57:30–70, 1929. English translationEuropean Physical Journal H, 35:201–237, 2010. URL:http://arxiv.org/abs/1003.2133

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1929

  64. [64]

    Dirk Walecka.Fundamentals of Statistical Mechanics: Manuscript and Notes of Felix Bloch

    J. Dirk Walecka.Fundamentals of Statistical Mechanics: Manuscript and Notes of Felix Bloch. Stanford University Press, 1989

    work page 1989

  65. [65]

    ¨Uber die Gleichverteilung von Zahlen mod

    Hermann Weyl. ¨Uber die Gleichverteilung von Zahlen mod. Eins.Mathematische Annalen, 77(3):313–352, 1916

    work page 1916

  66. [66]

    Springer, 1997

    Nailong Wu.The Maximum Entropy Method. Springer, 1997. 43

    work page 1997