pith. sign in

arxiv: 2601.06811 · v9 · submitted 2026-01-11 · ⚛️ physics.app-ph

Two-dimensional FrBD friction models for rolling contact

Luigi Romano This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 15:38 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.app-ph
keywords rolling contactfriction modelbristle dynamicspassivitytwo-dimensional modelimplicit function theoremdistributed contactspin slip
0
0 comments X

The pith

A two-dimensional FrBD model for rolling contact eliminates sliding velocity via the Implicit Function Theorem and preserves passivity in its linear formulations for nearly all practical parameters.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper generalizes the one-dimensional Friction with Bristle Dynamics framework to two dimensions so that rolling contact can include simultaneous longitudinal and lateral slips together with spin and arbitrary transport motion across a finite patch. It starts from a rheological bristle representation plus an analytical local sliding-friction law, then applies the Implicit Function Theorem to remove sliding velocity entirely, leaving a dynamic model driven only by the rigid relative velocity. Three distributed versions of increasing complexity are constructed for standard linear rolling, linear rolling with large spin, and semilinear rolling. Analysis of the linear cases establishes well-posedness, stability, and passivity under standard assumptions and almost any practical parametrization. Simulations display steady-state surfaces, transient relaxation, and the influence of changing normal loads, giving a unified description usable across many rolling systems.

Core claim

By representing bristle elements rheologically and pairing them with an analytical local sliding-friction law, the sliding velocity is eliminated through the Implicit Function Theorem, producing a fully dynamic friction model driven solely by rigid relative velocity. Distributed formulations of increasing complexity are then obtained for linear rolling contact, linear rolling with large spin slips, and semilinear cases; the linear versions are shown to be well-posed, stable, and passive for almost any practical choice of parameters.

What carries the argument

Implicit Function Theorem applied to the local sliding-friction law inside a bristle-dynamics representation, used to remove sliding velocity and obtain velocity-driven distributed models over the contact region.

If this is right

  • Linear rolling-contact formulations remain passive for almost any practical parametrization.
  • Well-posedness and stability hold for the linear models under standard assumptions.
  • Steady-state action surfaces and transient relaxation phenomena can be computed numerically.
  • The model accommodates arbitrary combinations of longitudinal, lateral, and spin slips over finite contact regions.
  • Semilinear extensions continue to handle large spin slips while retaining the core dynamic structure.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Passivity preservation would let the model be inserted directly into energy-based Lyapunov arguments for vehicle or manipulator control.
  • The same elimination step might be tried on non-rolling contact problems if their local laws also meet the invertibility requirement.
  • Quantitative comparison of simulated relaxation times against tire or wheel test data would check whether the transients match observed behavior.
  • When the Implicit Function Theorem does not apply, a hybrid numerical solution of the local law could still be substituted without losing the overall distributed structure.

Load-bearing premise

The local sliding-friction law must satisfy invertibility conditions that allow the Implicit Function Theorem to eliminate sliding velocity from the governing equations.

What would settle it

An explicit local friction law and parameter set for which the implicit function relating friction force to rigid velocity fails to exist locally, or a linear distributed model that produces negative energy dissipation for some practical parameter values.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.06811 by Luigi Romano.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: A schematic representation of the friction model: (a) configuration with a rigid substrate; (b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Free-body diagram of the bristle element in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Rolling contact problem between: (a) two spheres with angular velocities [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Schematic of a tyre rolling over a rigid road. For a rigid wheel, the spin components would [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Force-slip surfaces in the absence of spin slips (parabolic pressure distribution): (a) rectangular [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Action surfaces for different combinations of spin slips [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Friction circles (parabolic pressure distribution): (a) rectangular contact patch; (b) elliptical [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Steady-state characteristics in the absence of spin slips (rectangular contact area with parabolic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Steady-state characteristics in the absence of spin slips (elliptical contact area with parabolic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Steady-state characteristics in the presence of large spin slips (rectangular contact area with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Steady-state characteristics in the presence of large spin slips (elliptical contact area with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Transient forces predicted by Model 3 for step slip inputs in the absence of spin (parabolic pressure distribution). Line styles: rectangular contact area (solid thick line), elliptical contact area (dashed lines). Model parameters as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Transient forces predicted by Model 3 for step slip inputs in the presence of large spins (parabolic pressure distribution). Line styles: rectangular contact area (solid thick line), elliptical contact area (dashed lines). Model parameters as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Transient longitudinal force in the presence of an oscillating normal load and a time-varying [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_14.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

This paper develops a comprehensive two-dimensional generalisation of the recently introduced Friction with Bristle Dynamics (FrBD) framework for rolling contact problems. The proposed formulation extends the one-dimensional FrBD model to accommodate simultaneous longitudinal and lateral slips, spin, and arbitrary transport kinematics over a finite contact region. The derivation combines a rheological representation of the bristle element with an analytical local sliding-friction law. By relying on an application of the Implicit Function Theorem, the notion of sliding velocity is then eliminated, and a fully dynamic friction model, driven solely by the rigid relative velocity, is obtained. Building upon this local model, three distributed formulations of increasing complexity are introduced, covering standard linear rolling contact, as well as linear and semilinear rolling in the presence of large spin slips. For the linear formulations, well-posedness, stability, and passivity properties are investigated under standard assumptions. In particular, the analysis reveals that the model preserves passivity under almost any parametrisation of practical interest. Numerical simulations illustrate steady-state action surfaces, transient relaxation phenomena, and the effect of time-varying normal loads. The results provide a unified and mathematically tractable friction model applicable to a broad class of rolling contact systems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a two-dimensional generalization of the Friction with Bristle Dynamics (FrBD) framework for rolling contact. It combines a rheological bristle representation with an analytical local sliding-friction law, applies the Implicit Function Theorem to eliminate sliding velocity, and obtains a dynamic model driven solely by rigid-body relative velocity. Three distributed formulations of increasing complexity are introduced for linear rolling contact and for linear/semilinear rolling with large spin. For the linear formulations, well-posedness, stability, and passivity are analyzed under standard assumptions, with the claim that passivity is preserved under almost any practical parameterization. Numerical simulations illustrate steady-state action surfaces, transient relaxation, and effects of time-varying normal loads.

Significance. If the central derivation and passivity results hold, the work supplies a unified, mathematically tractable, and passive friction model for two-dimensional rolling contact that accommodates combined slips and spin. The passivity property under broad parameterization would be a notable strength for stability analysis in control and dynamics applications such as vehicle tires and robotic locomotion.

major comments (1)
  1. [Local model derivation via Implicit Function Theorem] Local-model derivation (IFT step): the claim that sliding velocity can be eliminated via the Implicit Function Theorem rests on the local sliding-friction law (rheological bristle plus analytical friction) having an invertible Jacobian everywhere in the domain, including under simultaneous longitudinal/lateral slips and spin. No explicit analytic verification or numerical check of the required monotonicity/non-singularity conditions is supplied for the two-dimensional case. This step is load-bearing for both the model reduction and the subsequent passivity proofs of the linear distributed formulations.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states the main results but contains no equations or quantitative statements; adding one or two key expressions (e.g., the reduced dynamic friction law or the passivity inequality) would improve readability.
  2. [Introduction / Notation] Notation for the two-dimensional slip and spin vectors should be introduced with an explicit table or diagram early in the manuscript to aid readers unfamiliar with the one-dimensional FrBD precursor.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive feedback. The primary concern is the lack of explicit verification for the Jacobian invertibility in the Implicit Function Theorem step. We address this below and will strengthen the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Local-model derivation (IFT step): the claim that sliding velocity can be eliminated via the Implicit Function Theorem rests on the local sliding-friction law (rheological bristle plus analytical friction) having an invertible Jacobian everywhere in the domain, including under simultaneous longitudinal/lateral slips and spin. No explicit analytic verification or numerical check of the required monotonicity/non-singularity conditions is supplied for the two-dimensional case. This step is load-bearing for both the model reduction and the subsequent passivity proofs of the linear distributed formulations.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit verification strengthens the foundation. The local friction law is constructed as the sum of a linear bristle term (with positive-definite stiffness matrix) and an analytical sliding-friction term that is strictly monotone in the sliding-velocity vector. This composite map is therefore strictly monotone on the entire domain, which directly implies that its Jacobian is positive definite and hence invertible for any combination of longitudinal/lateral slips and spin. The monotonicity holds under the standard assumptions on the analytical friction law (regularized Coulomb or similar) used throughout the paper. To make this transparent, we will add a dedicated appendix containing (i) the analytic proof of monotonicity and Jacobian nonsingularity in the two-dimensional setting and (ii) numerical checks for representative cases with large spin and simultaneous slips. These additions will also clarify the hypotheses underlying the passivity proofs. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The central modeling step applies the Implicit Function Theorem to eliminate sliding velocity from the combined rheological bristle and analytical friction law, yielding a dynamic model driven by rigid-body velocity. This relies on stated invertibility conditions under standard assumptions but does not reduce any claimed result to its inputs by construction, nor does it rename a fitted quantity as a prediction. No load-bearing self-citation chain is exhibited that would force the 2D extension or passivity properties; the prior 1D FrBD framework is referenced as a starting point but the 2D generalization, distributed formulations, and passivity analysis introduce independent content. The derivation remains self-contained as a modeling extension without the specific reductions required for circularity flags.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based solely on the abstract, the central claim rests on a rheological bristle representation combined with an analytical local sliding-friction law; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are stated.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption A rheological representation of the bristle element can be combined with an analytical local sliding-friction law
    Invoked to obtain the local model before applying the Implicit Function Theorem

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5498 in / 1275 out tokens · 37881 ms · 2026-05-16T15:38:24.436674+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

105 extracted references · 105 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Kinematics of rolling contact: derivation, misconceptions, and generalisations

    Romano L. Kinematics of rolling contact: derivation, misconceptions, and generalisations. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 216 (2025). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory. 2025.106201

    work page doi:10.1016/j.mechmachtheory 2025

  2. [2]

    Modeling and analysis of friction including rolling effects in multibody dynamics: a review

    Marques F, Flores P, Claro JCP, et al. Modeling and analysis of friction including rolling effects in multibody dynamics: a review. Multibody Syst Dyn 45:223–244 (2019). Available from: https: //doi.org/10.1007/s11044-018-09640-6

    work page doi:10.1007/s11044-018-09640-6 2019

  3. [3]

    A survey and comparison of several friction force models for dynamic analysis of multibody mechanical systems

    Marques F, Flores P, Pimenta Claro JC, Lankarani HM. A survey and comparison of several friction force models for dynamic analysis of multibody mechanical systems. Nonlinear Dyn 86(3):1407–1443 (2016). Available from:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-016-2999-3

    work page doi:10.1007/s11071-016-2999-3 2016

  4. [4]

    Rail Vehicle Dynamics

    Knothe K, Stichel S. Rail Vehicle Dynamics. 1st ed. Springer, Cham (2016)

    work page 2016

  5. [5]

    Three-Dimensional Elastic Bodies in Rolling Contact

    Kalker JJ. Three-Dimensional Elastic Bodies in Rolling Contact. 1st ed. Springer, Dordrecht (1990). Available from:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7889-9

    work page doi:10.1007/978-94-015-7889-9 1990

  6. [6]

    Rolling Contact Phenomena

    Kalker JJ. Rolling Contact Phenomena. In: Jacobson B, Kalker JJ (eds) Rolling Contact Phenomena. International Centre for Mechanical Sciences, vol. 411. Springer, Vienna (2000)

    work page 2000

  7. [7]

    Tire and Vehicle Dynamics

    Pacejka HB. Tire and Vehicle Dynamics. 3rd ed. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2012)

    work page 2012

  8. [8]

    The Science of Vehicle Dynamics

    Guiggiani M. The Science of Vehicle Dynamics. 3rd ed. Springer, Cham (2023). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06461-6

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-031-06461-6 2023

  9. [9]

    Advanced Brush Tyre Modelling

    Romano L. Advanced Brush Tyre Modelling. SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences. Springer, Cham (2022). Available from:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98435-9

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-030-98435-9 2022

  10. [10]

    Tire tread wear characteristics: insights from indoor experiments and analytical modeling

    Zhang M, Unrau HJ, Gießler M, Gauterin F. Tire tread wear characteristics: insights from indoor experiments and analytical modeling. Tribology International 10 (2025). Available from: https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2025.110752

    work page doi:10.1016/j.triboint.2025.110752 2025

  11. [11]

    Thilikos

    Zhang M, Unrau HJ, Gießler M, Gauterin F. A detailed tire tread friction model considering dynamic friction states. Tribology International 193 (2024). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j. triboint.2024.109342

    work page doi:10.1016/j 2024

  12. [12]

    Control of a spherical robot: path following based on nonholonomic kinematics and dynamics

    Zheng M, Zhan Q, Liu J, Cai Y. Control of a spherical robot: path following based on nonholonomic kinematics and dynamics. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics 23(3):337–345 (2011). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1000-9361(11)60040-X

    work page doi:10.1016/s1000-9361(11)60040-x 2011

  13. [13]

    Dynamics and control of a spherical robot with an internal omni- wheel platform

    Karavaev YL, Kilin AA. Dynamics and control of a spherical robot with an internal omni- wheel platform. Regul Chaot Dyn 20:134–152 (2015). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1134/ S1560354715020033

    work page 2015

  14. [14]

    Kinematic modeling of spherical rolling robots with a three-omnidirectional-wheel drive mechanism

    Ba PD, Dong Hoang Q, Lee SG, Nguyen TH, Quang Duong X, Tham BC. Kinematic modeling of spherical rolling robots with a three-omnidirectional-wheel drive mechanism. Proc. 20th Int. Conf. Control, Automation and Systems (ICCAS), 463–466 (2020). Available from: https//doi: 10.23919/ICCAS50221.2020.9268200

    work page doi:10.23919/iccas50221.2020.9268200 2020

  15. [15]

    Structure and dynamic modelling of a spherical robot

    Ghariblu H, Mohammadi H. Structure and dynamic modelling of a spherical robot. Proc. 8th Int. Symp. Mechatronics and Its Applications, 1–5 (2012). Available from: https//doi:10.1109/ISMA. 2012.6215159

    work page doi:10.1109/isma 2012

  16. [16]

    Modeling of spherical robots rolling on generic surfaces

    Hogan FR, Forbes JR. Modeling of spherical robots rolling on generic surfaces. Multibody Syst Dyn 35:91–109 (2015). Available from:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11044-014-9438-3

    work page doi:10.1007/s11044-014-9438-3 2015

  17. [17]

    Dynamic modeling of a spherical robot with arms using Kane’s method

    Zhuang W, Liu X, Fang C, Sun H. Dynamic modeling of a spherical robot with arms using Kane’s method. Proc. 4th Int. Conf. Natural Computation, 373–377 (2008). Available from: https//doi: 10.1109/ICNC.2008.595

    work page doi:10.1109/icnc.2008.595 2008

  18. [18]

    Kinematics of spherical robots rolling over 3D terrains

    Moazami S, Zargarzadeh H, Palanki S. Kinematics of spherical robots rolling over 3D terrains. Complexity, 14 pages (2019). Available from:https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/7543969

    work page doi:10.1155/2019/7543969 2019

  19. [19]

    Modeling chain continuously variable transmission for direct implementation in transmission control

    Yildiz Y, Piccininni A, Bottiglione F, Carbone G. Modeling chain continuously variable transmission for direct implementation in transmission control. Mechanism and Machine Theory 105:428–440 (2016). Available from:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2016.07.015

    work page doi:10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2016.07.015 2016

  20. [20]

    Physics-based modeling of a chain continuously variable transmis- sion

    Duan C, Hebbale K, Liu F, Yao J. Physics-based modeling of a chain continuously variable transmis- sion. Mechanism and Machine Theory 105:397–408 (2016). Available from: https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.mechmachtheory.2016.07.018

    work page 2016

  21. [21]

    Analytical flat belt drive model considering bilinear elastic behaviour with residual strains

    Kumaran VU, Weiss L, Zogg M, Wegener K. Analytical flat belt drive model considering bilinear elastic behaviour with residual strains. Mechanism and Machine Theory 190 (2023). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2023.105466

    work page doi:10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2023.105466 2023

  22. [22]

    Brush model

    Frendo F, Bucchi F. “Brush model” for the analysis of flat belt transmissions in steady-state conditions. Mechanism and Machine Theory 143:103653 (2020). Available from: https://doi.org/ 35 10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2019.103653

    work page doi:10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2019.103653 2020

  23. [23]

    Enhanced brush model for the mechanics of power transmission in flat belt drives under steady-state conditions: effect of belt elasticity

    Frendo F, Bucchi F. Enhanced brush model for the mechanics of power transmission in flat belt drives under steady-state conditions: effect of belt elasticity. Mechanism and Machine Theory 153:103998 (2020). Available from:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2020.103998

    work page doi:10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2020.103998 2020

  24. [24]

    Validation of the brush model for the analysis of flat belt transmissions in steady-state conditions by finite element simulation

    Bucchi F, Frendo F. Validation of the brush model for the analysis of flat belt transmissions in steady-state conditions by finite element simulation. Mechanism and Machine Theory 167:104556 (2022). Available from:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2021.104556

    work page doi:10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2021.104556 2022

  25. [25]

    Viscoelastic steady-state rolling contacts: a generalized boundary element formulation for conformal and non-conformal geometries

    Santeramo M, Putignano C, Vorlaufer G, Krenn S, Carbone G. Viscoelastic steady-state rolling contacts: a generalized boundary element formulation for conformal and non-conformal geometries. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 171 (2023). Available from: https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.jmps.2022.105129

    work page arXiv 2023

  26. [26]

    Simulating gear and bearing interactions in the presence of faults: Part I

    Sawalhi N, Randall RB. Simulating gear and bearing interactions in the presence of faults: Part I. The combined gear–bearing dynamic model and the simulation of localised bearing faults. Mech Syst Signal Process 22(8):1924–1951 (2008). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2007. 12.001

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2007 1924

  27. [27]

    Advanced bearing diagnostics: a comparative study of two powerful approaches

    Abboud D, Elbadaoui M, Smith WA, Randall RB. Advanced bearing diagnostics: a comparative study of two powerful approaches. Mech Syst Signal Process 114:604–627 (2019). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.05.011

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.05.011 2019

  28. [28]

    Nonlinear dynamic analysis of supporting bearings in a rotor–bearing system considering vibration interaction

    Liu Y, Yan C, Shi J, et al. Nonlinear dynamic analysis of supporting bearings in a rotor–bearing system considering vibration interaction. Nonlinear Dyn 113:22435–22458 (2025). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-025-11350-6

    work page doi:10.1007/s11071-025-11350-6 2025

  29. [29]

    Dynamic characteristic analysis of a gear–rotor–bearing coupling system considering bearing fit

    Zeng Q, Liu Y, Du W, et al. Dynamic characteristic analysis of a gear–rotor–bearing coupling system considering bearing fit. Nonlinear Dyn 113:2131–2154 (2025). Available from: https://doi.org/10. 1007/s11071-024-10290-x

    work page 2025

  30. [30]

    Transient phenomena in two elastic cylinders rolling over each other with dry friction

    Kalker JJ. Transient phenomena in two elastic cylinders rolling over each other with dry friction. J Appl Mech 37(3):677–688 (1970). Available from:https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3408597

    work page doi:10.1115/1.3408597 1970

  31. [31]

    Transient rolling contact phenomena

    Kalker JJ. Transient rolling contact phenomena. ASLE Trans 14(3):177–184 (1971). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/05698197108983240

    work page doi:10.1080/05698197108983240 1971

  32. [32]

    On the Rolling Contact of Two Elastic Bodies in the Presence of Dry Friction

    Kalker JJ. On the Rolling Contact of Two Elastic Bodies in the Presence of Dry Friction. PhD thesis, TH Delft (1967)

    work page 1967

  33. [33]

    Contact Mechanics

    Johnson KL. Contact Mechanics. Cambridge University Press (1985). Available from: https: //doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139171731

    work page doi:10.1017/cbo9781139171731 1985

  34. [34]

    Contact Mechanics in Tribology

    Goryacheva IG. Contact Mechanics in Tribology. Springer (1998)

    work page 1998

  35. [35]

    Contact Mechanics

    Barber JR. Contact Mechanics. Springer (2018). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/ 978-3-319-70939-0

    work page 2018

  36. [36]

    User Guide for CONTACT

    Vollebregt EAH. User Guide for CONTACT. Technical report TR09-03 (version 13)

    work page

  37. [37]

    FASTSIM2: a second-order accurate frictional rolling contact algorithm

    Vollebregt EAH, Wilders P. FASTSIM2: a second-order accurate frictional rolling contact algorithm. Comput Mech 47:105–116 (2011). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-010-0536-7

    work page doi:10.1007/s00466-010-0536-7 2011

  38. [38]

    Assessing the accuracy of simplified frictional rolling contact algorithms

    Vollebregt EAH, Iwnicki SD, Xie G, Shackelton P. Assessing the accuracy of simplified frictional rolling contact algorithms. Veh Syst Dyn 50(1):1–17 (2012). Available from: https://doi.org/10. 1080/00423114.2011.552618

    work page arXiv 2012

  39. [39]

    Numerical modeling of measured railway creep–force curves with CONTACT

    Vollebregt EAH. Numerical modeling of measured railway creep–force curves with CONTACT. Wear 314:87–95 (2014). Available from:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2013.11.030

    work page doi:10.1016/j.wear.2013.11.030 2014

  40. [40]

    New Developments in the Theory of Wheel/Rail Contact Mechanics

    Nielsen JB. New Developments in the Theory of Wheel/Rail Contact Mechanics. PhD thesis, Tech- nical University of Denmark (1998). Available from: https://orbit.dtu.dk/en/publications/ new-developments-in-the-theory-of-wheelrail-contact-mechanics

    work page 1998

  41. [41]

    Transient rolling of cylindrical contacts with constant and linearly increasing applied slip

    Dahlberg J, Alfredsson B. Transient rolling of cylindrical contacts with constant and linearly increasing applied slip. Wear 266:316–326 (2009). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2008. 07.008

    work page doi:10.1016/j.wear.2008 2009

  42. [42]

    Simplified theory of rolling contact

    Kalker JJ. Simplified theory of rolling contact. Delft Progress Report, Series C (1973), 1–10

    work page 1973

  43. [43]

    Railway wheel and automotive tyre

    Kalker JJ. Railway wheel and automotive tyre. Veh Syst Dyn 5(15):255–269 (1979)

    work page 1979

  44. [44]

    Short-wavelength rail corrugation and non-steady-state contact mechanics

    Knothe K, Groß-Thebing A. Short-wavelength rail corrugation and non-steady-state contact mechanics. Veh Syst Dyn 46(1–2):49–66 (2008). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/ 00423110701590180

    work page 2008

  45. [45]

    Non-steady-state modelling of wheel–rail contact for dynamic simulation of railway vehicles

    Alonso A, Gim´ enez JG. Non-steady-state modelling of wheel–rail contact for dynamic simulation of railway vehicles. Veh Syst Dyn 46(3):179–196 (2008). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/ 00423110701248011

    work page 2008

  46. [46]

    Non-steady-state modelling of wheel–rail contact

    Guiral A, Alonso A, Baeza L, Gim´ enez JG. Non-steady-state modelling of wheel–rail contact. Veh Syst 36 Dyn 51(1):91–108 (2013). Available from:https://doi.org/10.1080/00423114.2012.713499

    work page doi:10.1080/00423114.2012.713499 2013

  47. [47]

    Influence of longitudinal creepage and wheel inertia on short-pitch corruga- tion

    Ciavarella M, Barber J. Influence of longitudinal creepage and wheel inertia on short-pitch corruga- tion. Proc IMechE Part J: Eng Tribol 222(3) (2008). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1243/ 13506501JET373

    work page 2008

  48. [48]

    Short-pitch rail corrugation: a resonance-free regime? Wear 266:9–10 (2008)

    Afferrante L, Ciavarella M. Short-pitch rail corrugation: a resonance-free regime? Wear 266:9–10 (2008). Available from:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2008.12.003

    work page doi:10.1016/j.wear.2008.12.003 2008

  49. [49]

    Short-pitch corrugation of railway tracks with wooden or concrete sleepers: an enigma solved? Tribol Int 43(3) (2010)

    Afferrante L, Ciavarella M. Short-pitch corrugation of railway tracks with wooden or concrete sleepers: an enigma solved? Tribol Int 43(3) (2010). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint. 2009.09.010

    work page doi:10.1016/j.triboint 2010

  50. [50]

    A model of the transient behavior of tractive rolling contacts

    Al-Bender F, De Moerlooze K. A model of the transient behavior of tractive rolling contacts. Advances in Tribology (2008). Available from:https://doi.org/10.1155/2008/214894

    work page doi:10.1155/2008/214894 2008

  51. [51]

    Unsteady-state brush theory

    Romano L, Bruzelius F, Jacobson B. Unsteady-state brush theory. Veh Syst Dyn (2020). Available from:https://doi.org/10.1080/00423114.2020.1774625

    work page doi:10.1080/00423114.2020.1774625 2020

  52. [52]

    Analytical results in transient brush tyre models: theory for large camber angles and classic solutions with limited friction

    Romano L, Timpone F, Bruzelius F, Jacobson B. Analytical results in transient brush tyre models: theory for large camber angles and classic solutions with limited friction. Meccanica 57:165–191 (2022). Available from:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11012-021-01422-3

    work page doi:10.1007/s11012-021-01422-3 2022

  53. [53]

    Rolling, tilting and spinning spherical wheels: analytical results using brush theory

    Romano L, Timpone F, Bruzelius F, Jacobson B. Rolling, tilting and spinning spherical wheels: analytical results using brush theory. Mechanism and Machine Theory 173:104836 (2022). Available from:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2022.104836

    work page doi:10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2022.104836 2022

  54. [54]

    The model of dry friction in the problem of rolling rigid bodies

    Zhuravlev VP. The model of dry friction in the problem of rolling rigid bodies. J Appl Math Mech 62(5):705–710 (1998)

    work page 1998

  55. [55]

    Friction laws in the case of combination of slip and spin

    Zhuravlev VP. Friction laws in the case of combination of slip and spin. Mech Solids 38(4):52–58 (2003)

    work page 2003

  56. [56]

    About the motion of a symmetric rigid solid on a plane

    Kireenkov AA. About the motion of a symmetric rigid solid on a plane. Proc. 8th Conf. DSTA, 95–102 (2005)

    work page 2005

  57. [57]

    Combined model of sliding and rolling friction in the dynamics of bodies on a rough plane

    Kireenkov AA. Combined model of sliding and rolling friction in the dynamics of bodies on a rough plane. Mech Solids 43(3):412–425 (2008)

    work page 2008

  58. [58]

    A new model for control of systems with friction

    Canudas-de-Wit C, Olsson H, ˚Astr¨ om KJ, Lischinsky P. A new model for control of systems with friction. IEEE Trans Autom Control 40(3):419–425 (1995)

    work page 1995

  59. [59]

    Control Systems with Friction

    Olsson H. Control Systems with Friction. Doctoral thesis, Lund Institute of Technology (1996)

    work page 1996

  60. [60]

    Revisiting the LuGre friction model

    ˚Astr¨ om KJ, Canudas-de-Wit C. Revisiting the LuGre friction model. IEEE Control Syst Mag 28(6):101–114 (2008)

    work page 2008

  61. [61]

    A new dynamic multi d.o.f

    Sorine M, Szymanski J. A new dynamic multi d.o.f. tire model. Transportation Systems 2000, Braunschweig (2000)

    work page 2000

  62. [62]

    Dynamic tire friction models for vehicle traction control

    Canudas-de-Wit C, Tsiotras P. Dynamic tire friction models for vehicle traction control. Proc. 38th IEEE CDC, 3746–3751 (1999). Available from:https//doi:10.1109/CDC.1999.827937

    work page doi:10.1109/cdc.1999.827937 1999

  63. [63]

    Dynamic friction models for road/tire longitudinal interaction

    Canudas-de-Wit C, Tsiotras P, Velenis E, et al. Dynamic friction models for road/tire longitudinal interaction. Veh Syst Dyn 39(3):189–226 (2003). Available from: https//doi:10.1076/vesd.39.3. 189.14152

    work page doi:10.1076/vesd.39.3 2003

  64. [64]

    Dynamic tyre friction models for combined slip

    Velenis E, Tsiotras P, Canudas-de-Wit C, Sorine M. Dynamic tyre friction models for combined slip. Veh Syst Dyn 43:3–29 (2005). Available from:https//doi:10.1080/00423110412331290464

    work page doi:10.1080/00423110412331290464 2005

  65. [65]

    Modeling and analysis of longitudinal tire dynamics based on the LuGre friction model

    Deur J. Modeling and analysis of longitudinal tire dynamics based on the LuGre friction model. IFAC Proc Vol 34(1):91–96 (2001). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-6670(17)34383-5

    work page doi:10.1016/s1474-6670(17)34383-5 2001

  66. [66]

    A 3D brush-type dynamic tire friction model

    Deur J, Asgari J, Hrovat D. A 3D brush-type dynamic tire friction model. Veh Syst Dyn 42(3):133–173 (2004). Available from:https://doi.org/10.1080/00423110412331282887

    work page doi:10.1080/00423110412331282887 2004

  67. [67]

    Extensions of the LuGre tyre friction model for variable slip speed

    Deur J, Ivanovi´ c V, Troulis M, et al. Extensions of the LuGre tyre friction model for variable slip speed. Veh Syst Dyn 43(1):508–524 (2005). Available from:https//doi:10.1080/00423110500229808

    work page doi:10.1080/00423110500229808 2005

  68. [68]

    An integrated friction model with improved presliding behavior

    Swevers J, Al-Bender F, Ganseman CG, Projogo T. An integrated friction model with improved presliding behavior. IEEE Trans Autom Control 45(4):675–686 (2000)

    work page 2000

  69. [69]

    Modification of the Leuven integrated friction model

    Lampaert V, Swevers J, Al-Bender F. Modification of the Leuven integrated friction model. IEEE Trans Autom Control 47(4):683–687 (2002)

    work page 2002

  70. [70]

    Elasto-plastic friction model: contact compliance and stiction

    Dupont P, Armstrong B, Hayward V. Elasto-plastic friction model: contact compliance and stiction. Proc. 2000 American Control Conference, 1072–1077 (2000)

    work page 2000

  71. [71]

    Single-state elasto-plastic friction models

    Dupont P, Hayward V, Armstrong B, et al. Single-state elasto-plastic friction models. IEEE Trans Autom Control 47:787–792 (2002)

    work page 2002

  72. [72]

    First-order friction models with bristle dynamics: lumped and distributed formulations

    Romano L, Aamo OM, ˚Aslund J, Frisk E. First-order friction models with bristle dynamics: lumped and distributed formulations. Submitted to IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol (2025)

    work page 2025

  73. [73]

    An extended LuGre-brush tyre model for large camber angles 37 and turning speeds

    Romano L, Bruzelius F, Jacobson B. An extended LuGre-brush tyre model for large camber angles 37 and turning speeds. Veh Syst Dyn (2022). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/00423114. 2022.2086887

    work page doi:10.1080/00423114 2022

  74. [74]

    Experimental analysis and modelling of friction in automotive shock absorbers under side forces

    Deubel C, Dittrich B, Meinck J, Prokop G. Experimental analysis and modelling of friction in automotive shock absorbers under side forces. Tribology International 215A (2026):111328. Available from:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2025.111328

    work page doi:10.1016/j.triboint.2025.111328 2026

  75. [75]

    LuGre or not LuGre

    Rill G, Schaeffer T, Schuderer M. LuGre or not LuGre. Multibody Syst Dyn 60:191–218 (2024). Available from:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11044-023-09909-5

    work page doi:10.1007/s11044-023-09909-5 2024

  76. [76]

    Phase portraits and bifurcations induced by static and dynamic friction models

    Bekesi BJ, Antali M, Csernak G. Phase portraits and bifurcations induced by static and dynamic friction models. Nonlinear Dyn 13:15863–15899 (2025). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11071-025-10974-y

    work page 2025

  77. [77]

    Advanced Calculus of Several Variables, Vol

    Edwards CH. Advanced Calculus of Several Variables, Vol. III – Successive Approximations and Implicit Functions. Academic Press (1973)

    work page 1973

  78. [78]

    Transient wheel–rail rolling contact theories

    Romano L, Maglio M, Bruni S. Transient wheel–rail rolling contact theories. Tribology International (2023)

    work page 2023

  79. [79]

    Nonlinear Systems

    Khalil HK. Nonlinear Systems. 3rd ed. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (2002)

    work page 2002

  80. [80]

    Input-to-state stability of infinite-dimensional systems: recent results and open questions

    Mironchenko A, Prieur C. Input-to-state stability of infinite-dimensional systems: recent results and open questions. SIAM Review 62(3) (2020)

    work page 2020

Showing first 80 references.