Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 3 minor 118 references

Two-dimensional FrBD friction models for rolling contact: extension to linear viscoelasticity

T0 review · 2 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper extends the distributed FrBD rolling-contact friction framework to linear viscoelasticity, proving that the resulting Generalised Maxwell and Kelvin-Voigt based hyperbolic PDE models are well-posed and passive for any physically m

desk verdict A useful GM/GKV upgrade of FrBD with original passivity proofs, but Models 3 has a dimensional bug that must be fixed and the core truncation needs a validity bound. read the letter →

arxiv 2601.13818 v13 pith:255KYKCC submitted 2026-01-20 physics.app-ph cs.NAmath.NA

Luigi Romano This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.app-phcs.NAmath.NA
keywords viscoelasticrollingcontactfrictionwithbristledynamicsGeneralisedMaxwellmodelKelvin-VoigthyperbolicPDEspassivitytyredistributedparametersystems
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper extends the distributed FrBD (friction with bristle dynamics) rolling-contact framework from a single Kelvin-Voigt element to arbitrary-order linear viscoelasticity. The bristle is modelled as a Generalised Maxwell or Generalised Kelvin-Voigt element, and the resulting dynamics are formulated as 2(n+1) hyperbolic PDEs over the contact patch. The central theoretical claims are that the linear variants (Models 1 and 3) are well-posed, input-to-state stable, and passive for any physically meaningful parametrisation, with passivity proved via storage functions built from the elastic energy of the rheological branches. If correct, this gives a state-space route to incorporate experimentally identified relaxation spectra of polymers into rolling-contact simulations without ad hoc creep-force laws.

What carries the argument

The central objects are the Generalised Maxwell and Generalised Kelvin-Voigt rheological models of the bristle element, which provide arbitrary-order linear viscoelastic constitutive relations. They are converted, using the implicit-function theorem and a one-step Newton truncation, into lumped ODE models (FrBD n+1-GM and FrBD n+1-GKV), then into first-order hyperbolic PDE systems by an Eulerian transport formulation with boundary conditions at the leading edge. The passivity proofs rest on storage functions that are weighted L2 sums of the elastic energies of the rheological branches; differentiating them along the PDE dynamics and using the condition div(p V-bar) <= 0 converts the dissipat

What would settle it

Numerically integrate the full implicit algebraic equation (14) with the exact Jacobian and compare its solution to the one-step truncation (17) in a near-stick rolling cycle where the bristle deformation rate approaches the rigid slip; any material gap in generated force and moment would show the core derivation is not uniformly valid.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The core claim is that coupling the FrBD bristle deformation dynamics to standard Generalised Maxwell and Generalised Kelvin-Voigt constitutive equations yields a family of distributed friction models whose state evolution is described by a first-order hyperbolic PDE system with internal relaxation states. For the linear versions, the paper proves existence and uniqueness of mild and classical solutions via semigroup arguments, and proves passivity with respect to the slip input: the time derivative of the stored elastic energy is bounded by the product of contact force and slip, under the single structural condition that the local pressure times transport velocity has non-positive divergenc

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that bristle deformation rate stays small compared with rigid slip, so the one-step implicit-function truncation that produces the lumped dynamics is accurate; no error bound is provided for this step.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Relaxation spectra measured by dynamic mechanical analysis can be inserted directly into rolling-contact simulations as GM or GKV branch parameters, replacing empirical relaxation lengths.
  • The passivity proofs guarantee that coupling the distributed friction model to vehicle or multibody dynamics preserves closed-loop stability for any positive semidefinite stiffness and damping matrices.
  • Higher-order rheological branches introduce time and space relaxation lengths that produce transient overshoot and delayed settling, so first-order models may underestimate transient peaks in rapid manoeuvres.
  • Steady-state force-slip surfaces are independent of rheological order, allowing steady and transient data to be identified separately.
  • The GM/GKV equivalence means the two realisations give identical input-output behaviour, so the state-space choice can be made for numerical convenience.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A rigorous error bound for the one-step Newton truncation is missing; quantifying it in near-stick conditions would determine the model's validity domain and is a natural next step.
  • The passivity condition on the pressure distribution suggests a testable criterion: for a given tyre or roller contact, measured pressure profiles can be checked against div(p V-bar) <= 0, including under large spin.
  • Since fractional viscoelastic models can be approximated by GM/GKV spectra, the framework likely extends toward fractional constitutive laws by taking many branches, but the paper leaves the convergence analysis implicit.
  • The vertical moment response is more sensitive than forces to the relaxation spectrum, suggesting moment measurements may be the most discriminating experimental observable for identifying viscoelastic bristle parameters.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper extends the distributed rolling-contact FrBD framework to linear viscoelasticity by replacing the single Kelvin-Voigt bristle element with Generalised Maxwell (GM) and Generalised Kelvin-Voigt (GKV) rheologies. The lumped ODEs of Sect. 2 are converted in Sect. 3 into hyperbolic PDE systems with 2(n+1) states, and three rolling-contact variants are introduced: Models 1 (standard linear, small spin), Models 2 (semilinear, large spin), and Models 3 (linearised large-spin). Section 4 claims well-posedness, ISS/IOS, and, in Lemmata 4.1 and 4.2, passivity of the two linear formulations for physically meaningful parameters, with storage functions built from elastic branch energies. Numerical experiments in Sect. 5 illustrate steady-state force-slip surfaces and transient relaxation for n=1,2.

Significance. The GM/GKV extension is a genuinely useful step beyond the single-relaxation FrBD1-KV model: it offers a state-space, hyperbolic-PDE route to incorporate arbitrary-order linear viscoelastic relaxation spectra into distributed rolling-contact friction models, and it explicitly treats both GM and GKV realisations. The passivity analysis for Models 1 is carefully derived and would be a valuable result; the qualitative numerical comparisons of force/moment responses across rheological orders are also informative. However, the current manuscript does not establish the analogous claims for Models 3: the definition of the linearised coefficient matrix is dimensionally inconsistent, and the passivity proofs omit the spin-induced coupling terms that distinguish Models 3 from Models 1. Because the abstract and Section 4 explicitly claim rigorous passivity for 'the linear variants' including Models 3, these are load-bearing defects that require revision before the paper can be accepted.

major comments (2)
  1. [Eq. (46c), Eq. (48a), Theorem 4.2] Even after the projection is inserted, the passivity proofs do not close. For the GM case, substituting \bar v_r = \bar v − A_{φ2} z into the first row of (28a) gives an extra +A_{φ2} z term in ∂z/∂s, and the i-th row gains +K_i A_{φ2} z in ∂f_i/∂s. These terms are absent from Eqs. (55)–(57). When carried through the differentiation of the storage function (54), they produce contributions z^T K0 A_{φ2} z and Σ f_i^T A_{φ2} z, which are not sign-definite for general anisotropic K0, K_i, and therefore do not respect inequality (58). The same omission occurs in the GKV proof, where Eq. (60a) should contain +A_{φ2}(z0 + Σz_i) in the z0 dynamics. Thus Lemmata 4.1 and 4.2 do not, as written, prove passivity for Models 3; additional structural assumptions or a different passivity notion are needed.
  2. [Sect. 2.2] The derivation of the lumped FrBD dynamics rests on a double approximation: the condition ||ż||_2 << ||v_r||_2 and the truncation of the implicit-function iteration (15) at k=1 with initial guess ż0=0. No error estimate or validity bound is provided for this truncation, and in rolling contact the smallness of ||ż|| relative to ||v_r|| is not guaranteed near the leading edge or in near-stick regions. Since Eq. (17) is the foundation of all PDE models analysed in Section 4, the paper should at least quantify the residual of the implicit-function step or justify the approximation regime with numerical evidence. The current claim that the resulting models preserve dissipative behaviour is only conditional on this unquantified step.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Notation and typos] There are several typographical issues in the notation and text: 'N [ f0g' should read 'N ∪ {0}', 'R2 3 u(x,s)' should be 'u(x,s) ∈ R^2', 'rFrBD' in the Conclusions should be 'FrBD', and 'the authors declare' in the compliance statement should be 'the author declares' for a sole-authored paper. These do not affect the technical content.
  2. [Theorem 4.2 / Sect. 4.1] The proofs of Theorems 4.1 and 4.2 are deferred to the companion paper [88]. This is acceptable if the companion is freely available, but the manuscript should state which exact assumptions are imported and which parts of the proof are new, especially since Theorem 4.2 currently relies on the ill-defined \tildeΣ_φ of Eq. (46c).
  3. [Figures 4–10] The figure captions use line styles to distinguish FrBD1-KV, FrBD2-GM, and FrBD3-GM, but some figures (e.g., Figs. 4, 5, 8–10) do not specify whether the plotted data correspond to Models 1, 2, or 3. The text in Section 5 indicates a mix; clarifying this in the captions would improve reproducibility.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

Minor self-citation for template/theorems; central GM/GKV extension and passivity proof are independent content. However, Eq. (46c) dimension incompatibility makes the Models 3 passivity branch formally undefined (correctness risk, not circularity).

  1. self citation load bearing [Sect. 4.1, proofs of Theorems 4.1 and 4.2]
    "Proof. The result follows along the same lines as the proof of Theorem 3.1 in [88]. ... Proof. The result follows along the same lines as the proof of Theorem 3.2 in [88]."

    Well-posedness of the new Models 1 and 3 is delegated verbatim to the same author's prior paper [88], which is itself the subject of a companion submission. This is a citation of prior work by the same author for the template of existence/uniqueness, but the cited results concern FrBD1-KV and not the GM/GKV extension. The central novelty (arbitrary-order viscoelastic states) is not proven here; however, the step is not circular in the sense of the model equations reducing to the assumptions, since the cited theorems are external results with independent statement. It is a self-citation that is load-bearing for the form of the model, but the central passivity claim has its own proof.

  2. self definitional [Sect. 4.1, Eq. (46c), Theorem 4.2, Eq. (48)]
    "˜Σφ(x, s) ≜ Σ(¯v(x, s), s) − HAφ2(s). ... the PDE (48) admits a unique mild solution ..."

    In (46c), Σ(¯v,s) is M_{2(n+1)}, H is M_{2(n+1)×2}, and Aφ2(s) is M2, so HAφ2 is 2(n+1)×2, while Σ is square; the subtraction is dimensionally illegal and the PDE (48a) is not defined. This is not a circular reduction of the prediction to the inputs, but it is a self-definitional breakdown: the definition of the object that the theorem claims to analyze (˜Σφ) is inconsistent with the claimed existence result. If one repairs it with HAφ2P and P=[I2 0], the proof in Lemma 4.1 would still need a compensating term; as written, the 'resp. (48)' branch of Lemmata 4.1/4.2 asserts passivity of a PDE that is not well-formed.

full rationale

The central claim of the paper is the extension of the FrBD1-KV rolling model to GM and GKV bristle rheology, resulting in the 2(n+1)-state hyperbolic PDEs (26)-(29). The GM and GKV state equations (2), (8) are introduced as constitutive relations from the classical viscoelasticity literature, not derived from the target result. The derived ODE dynamics (17)-(19) follow from the implicit-function truncation Eq. (15)-(17) with stated assumptions, and the PDEs (43)-(45) are the Eulerian reformulations. The steady-state force-slip relationship (20) follows directly from Eq. (17), and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction: the model parameters are structural inputs (Table 1), and the simulations compare models rather than predicting data. The passivity proofs in Lemmata 4.1 and 4.2 are self-contained calculations using the storage functions (54) and (59), with the dissipation terms appearing from the GM/GKV branch structure; the final sign inequalities are genuine consequences rather than built-in assumptions. The main criticisms are not circularity in the sense of the instructions. First, Theorems 4.1 and 4.2 are proved by citing the author's own prior [88] ('along the same lines as the proof of Theorem 3.1 [3.2] in [88]'), which is a self-citation load-bearing for well-posedness but does not make the central claim reduce to the input; the cited result concerns a different (lower-order) model. Second, Eq. (46c) defines ˜Σφ = Σ − H Aφ2, which is dimensionally inconsistent (M_{2(n+1)×2} subtracted from M_{2(n+1)}), so the Models 3 PDE (48) and the corresponding passivity branch are formally not a defined object. This is a correctness problem and a subtle self-definitional breakdown, but it does not amount to the prediction being equivalent to the input by construction. A numerical or editorial correction (e.g., HAφ2P with P=[I2 0]) would be needed; the corrected statement would still be an independent claim. The paper also states explicitly that it repeats the main derivation steps of [88] 'for self-containment,' which supports the assessment that the core modeling framework is adapted from prior work, but the new GM/GKV content is independent. Overall score: 2, indicating minor self-citation that is load-bearing only for the well-posedness template and not for the central passivity result; the undefined ˜Σφ is flagged as a formal defect affecting the Models 3 branch but not a circularity of the kind stated by the scoring rubric.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the bristle idealisation, the sliding-regime truncation, spatial constancy of rheological coefficients, the pressure condition (53), and the phenomenological friction law. No new physical entity is introduced; the internal force/deformation states are auxiliiary model variables inherited from the GM/GKV rheology.

free parameters (5)
  • simulation micro-stiffness matrices K̄0, K̄1, K̄2 = k̄0x=k̄0y=240 m^-1, k̄1x=k̄1y=240 m^-1, k̄2x=k̄2y=260 m^-1
    Chosen by hand in Table 1 to be close to the zeroth branch stiffness so that differences among models arise from relaxation effects; not fitted to target data.
  • simulation relaxation times τ1, τ2 = τ1x=τ1y=0.1 s, τ2x=τ2y=0.05 s
    Hand-picked order-of-magnitude rubber relaxation times consistent with prior tyre-friction studies; not fitted to new measurements.
  • friction curve parameters µs, µd, vS, δS = µs=1, µd=0.7, vS=3.49 m/s, δS=0.6
    Adapted from [78,79,81,82] to reproduce Stribeck-type friction; not identified from the paper's own data.
  • regularisation parameter ε = 10^-12 m^2/s^2
    Standard norm regularisation; chosen to avoid division by zero and to approximate the Euclidean norm.
  • contact geometry and normal load = a=0.075 m, b=0.05 m, Fz=4000 N
    Assumed rectangular/elliptical patch dimensions and load for the simulations; not central to the theoretical claims.
assumptions (7)
  • ad hoc to paper The bristle dynamics satisfies the sliding-regime approximation ||ż||_2 << ||v_r||_2, and the implicit-function iteration truncated at k=1 with ż0=0 gives Eq. (17).
    Section 2.2 before Eq. (15) and Eq. (17); this is a load-bearing modelling approximation with no stated error bound.
  • domain assumption Rheological coefficient matrices K̄_i, C̄_i, τ_i are spatially constant.
    Stated in Section 2.1 footnote and used in Appendix A; the GM/GKV interconversion and PDE derivation rely on this.
  • domain assumption The contact area C(s) is known a priori and independent of tangential interactions.
    Section 3.1.1; standard in rolling contact theories, but it excludes feedback of tangential forces on the patch.
  • domain assumption The pressure distribution satisfies ∇·(p V̄) ≤ 0 for the passivity proofs.
    Lemmata 4.1 and 4.2, Eq. (53); without this condition the claimed passivity is not established.
  • domain assumption Friction force is described by the regularised Coulomb-type law (12) with symmetric positive definite M(v_s).
    Section 2.2, Eq. (12); the entire model inherits this phenomenological friction law.
  • domain assumption GM and GKV rheological models are equivalent and interconvertible for all n.
    Section 2.1 and Eq. (9), citing [96,97]; the two realisations are treated as dynamically equivalent.
  • standard math Standard semigroup and evolution-equation theory for linear hyperbolic PDEs.
    Theorems 4.1 and 4.2 invoke semigroup arguments, with proofs deferred to [88].

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Two-dimensional FrBD friction models for rolling contact: extension to linear viscoelasticity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/255KYKCC

@misc{pith2026260113818,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Two-dimensional FrBD friction models for rolling contact: extension to linear viscoelasticity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/255KYKCC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2601.13818}
}
read the original abstract

This paper extends the distributed rolling contact FrBD framework to linear viscoelasticity by considering classic derivative Generalised Maxwell and Kelvin-Voigt rheological representations of the bristle element. With this modelling approach, the dynamics of the bristle, generated friction forces, and internal deformation states are described by a system of 2(n+1) hyperbolic partial differential equations (PDEs), which can capture complex relaxation phenomena originating from viscoelastic behaviours. By appropriately specifying the analytical expressions for the transport and rigid relative velocity, three distributed formulations of increasing complexity are introduced, which account for different levels of spin excitation. For the linear variants, well-posedness and passivity are analysed rigorously, showing that these properties hold for any physically meaningful parametrisation. Numerical experiments complement the theoretical results by illustrating steady-state characteristics and transient relaxation effects. The findings of this paper substantially advance the FrBD paradigm by enabling a unified and systematic treatment of linear viscoelasticity.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.13818 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. A schematic representation of the friction model: (a) configuration with a rigid substrate; (b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. A schematic representation of the Generalised Maxwell (GM) and Generalised Kelvin-Voigt [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Rolling contact problem between: (a) two spheres with angular velocities [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Steady-state characteristics in the absence of spin slips predicted using Models [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Steady-state characteristics in the absence of spin slips predicted using Models [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Steady-state characteristics in the presence of large spin slips predicted using Models [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Steady-state characteristics in the presence of large spin slips predicted using Models [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Transient characteristics predicted by Models [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Transient forces predicted by Models 3 for a sinusoidal slip input as in Eq. (66), with σ = (0.04, 0.08) and (ω1, ω2) = (50, 0) m−1 (line contact with parabolic pressure distribution). Line styles: FrBD1-KV from [88] (solid thick lines), FrBD2-GM (solid lines), FrBD3-G…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Transient forces predicted by Models 3 for a sinusoidal slip input as in Eq. (66), with σ = (0.04, 0.08) and (ω1, ω2) = (50, 100) m−1 (line contact with parabolic pressure distribution). Line styles: FrBD1-KV from [88] (solid thick lines), FrBD2-GM (solid lines), FrBD…

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

118 extracted references

  1. [88]

    Two-dimensional FrBD friction models for rolling contact

    Romano L. Two-dimensional FrBD friction models for rolling contact. Nonlinear Dyn (2026)

    2026

  2. [1]

    Kinematics of rolling contact: derivation, misconceptions, and generalisations

    Romano L. Kinematics of rolling contact: derivation, misconceptions, and generalisations. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 216 (2025). A vailable from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j. mechmachtheory.2025.106201

    arXiv 2025

  3. [2]

    Modeling and analysis of friction including rolling effects in multibody dynamics: a review

    Marques F, Flores P, Claro JCP, et al. Modeling and analysis of friction including rolling effects in multibody dynamics: a review. Multibody Syst Dyn 45:223–244 (2019). A vailable from: https: //doi.org/10.1007/s11044-018-09640-6

    doi:10.1007/s11044-018-09640-6 2019

  4. [3]

    A survey and comparison of several friction force models for dynamic analysis of multibody mechanical systems

    Marques F, Flores P, Pimenta Claro JC, Lankarani HM. A survey and comparison of several friction force models for dynamic analysis of multibody mechanical systems. Nonlinear Dyn 86(3):1407–1443 (2016). A vailable from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-016-2999-3

    doi:10.1007/s11071-016-2999-3 2016

  5. [4]

    Rail Vehicle Dynamics

    Knothe K, Stichel S. Rail Vehicle Dynamics. 1st ed. Springer, Cham (2016)

    2016

  6. [5]

    Three-Dimensional Elastic Bodies in Rolling Contact

    Kalker JJ. Three-Dimensional Elastic Bodies in Rolling Contact. 1st ed. Springer, Dordrecht (1990). A vailable from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7889-9

    doi:10.1007/978-94-015-7889-9 1990

  7. [6]

    Rolling Contact Phenomena

    Kalker JJ. Rolling Contact Phenomena. In: Jacobson B, Kalker JJ (eds) Rolling Contact Phenomena. International Centre for Mechanical Sciences, vol. 411. Springer, Vienna (2000)

    2000

  8. [7]

    Tire and Vehicle Dynamics

    Pacejka HB. Tire and Vehicle Dynamics. 3rd ed. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2012)

    2012

Show all 118 references
  1. [8]

    The Science of Vehicle Dynamics

    Guiggiani M. The Science of Vehicle Dynamics. 3rd ed. Springer, Cham (2023). A vailable from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06461-6

    2023 doi

  2. [9]

    Advanced Brush Tyre Modelling

    Romano L. Advanced Brush Tyre Modelling. SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences. Springer, Cham (2022). A vailable from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98435-9

    2022 doi

  3. [10]

    Tire tread wear characteristics: insights from indoor experiments and analytical modeling

    Zhang M, Unrau HJ, Gießler M, Gauterin F. Tire tread wear characteristics: insights from indoor experiments and analytical modeling. Tribology International 10 (2025). A vailable from: https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2025.110752

    2025

  4. [11]

    A detailed tire tread friction model considering dynamic friction states

    Zhang M, Unrau HJ, Gießler M, Gauterin F. A detailed tire tread friction model considering dynamic friction states. Tribology International 193 (2024). A vailable from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j. triboint.2024.109342

    2024

  5. [12]

    Control of a spherical robot: path following based on nonholonomic kinematics and dynamics

    Zheng M, Zhan Q, Liu J, Cai Y. Control of a spherical robot: path following based on nonholonomic kinematics and dynamics. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics 23(3):337–345 (2011). A vailable from: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1000-9361(11)60040-X

    2011 doi

  6. [13]

    Dynamics and control of a spherical robot with an internal omni- wheel platform

    Karavaev YL, Kilin AA. Dynamics and control of a spherical robot with an internal omni- wheel platform. Regul Chaot Dyn 20:134–152 (2015). A vailable from: https://doi.org/10.1134/ S1560354715020033

    2015

  7. [14]

    Kinematic modeling of spherical rolling robots with a three-omnidirectional-wheel drive mechanism

    Ba PD, Dong Hoang Q, Lee SG, Nguyen TH, Quang Duong X, Tham BC. Kinematic modeling of spherical rolling robots with a three-omnidirectional-wheel drive mechanism. Proc. 20th Int. Conf. Control, Automation and Systems (ICCAS), 463–466 (2020). A vailable from: https//doi: 10.239...

    2020

  8. [15]

    Structure and dynamic modelling of a spherical robot

    Ghariblu H, Mohammadi H. Structure and dynamic modelling of a spherical robot. Proc. 8th Int. Symp. Mechatronics and Its Applications, 1–5 (2012). A vailable from: https//doi:10.1109/ISMA. 2012.6215159

    2012

  9. [16]

    Modeling of spherical robots rolling on generic surfaces

    Hogan FR, Forbes JR. Modeling of spherical robots rolling on generic surfaces. Multibody Syst Dyn 35:91–109 (2015). A vailable from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11044-014-9438-3

    2015 doi

  10. [17]

    Dynamic modeling of a spherical robot with arms using Kane’s method

    Zhuang W, Liu X, Fang C, Sun H. Dynamic modeling of a spherical robot with arms using Kane’s method. Proc. 4th Int. Conf. Natural Computation, 373–377 (2008). A vailable from: https//doi: 10.1109/ICNC.2008.595

    2008 doi

  11. [18]

    Kinematics of spherical robots rolling over 3D terrains

    Moazami S, Zargarzadeh H, Palanki S. Kinematics of spherical robots rolling over 3D terrains. Complexity, 14 pages (2019). A vailable from: https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/7543969

    2019 doi

  12. [19]

    Modeling chain continuously variable transmission for direct implementation in transmission control

    Yildiz Y, Piccininni A, Bottiglione F, Carbone G. Modeling chain continuously variable transmission for direct implementation in transmission control. Mechanism and Machine Theory 105:428–440 (2016). A vailable from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2016.07.015

    2016 doi

  13. [20]

    Physics-based modeling of a chain continuously variable trans- mission

    Duan C, Hebbale K, Liu F, Yao J. Physics-based modeling of a chain continuously variable trans- mission. Mechanism and Machine Theory 105:397–408 (2016). A vailable from: https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2016.07.018

    2016 doi

  14. [21]

    Analytical flat belt drive model considering bilinear elastic behaviour with residual strains

    Kumaran VU, Weiss L, Zogg M, Wegener K. Analytical flat belt drive model considering bilinear elastic behaviour with residual strains. Mechanism and Machine Theory 190 (2023). A vailable from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2023.105466

    2023

  15. [22]

    Brush model

    Frendo F, Bucchi F. “Brush model” for the analysis of flat belt transmissions in steady-state con- ditions. Mechanism and Machine Theory 143:103653 (2020). A vailable from: https://doi.org/10. 28 1016/j.mechmachtheory.2019.103653

    2020

  16. [23]

    Enhanced brush model for the mechanics of power transmission in flat belt drives under steady-state conditions: effect of belt elasticity

    Frendo F, Bucchi F. Enhanced brush model for the mechanics of power transmission in flat belt drives under steady-state conditions: effect of belt elasticity. Mechanism and Machine Theory 153:103998 (2020). A vailable from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2020.103998

    2020

  17. [24]

    Validation of the brush model for the analysis of flat belt transmissions in steady-state conditions by finite element simulation

    Bucchi F, Frendo F. Validation of the brush model for the analysis of flat belt transmissions in steady-state conditions by finite element simulation. Mechanism and Machine Theory 167:104556 (2022). A vailable from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2021.104556

    2022

  18. [25]

    Viscoelastic steady-state rolling contacts: a generalized boundary element formulation for conformal and non-conformal geometries

    Santeramo M, Putignano C, Vorlaufer G, Krenn S, Carbone G. Viscoelastic steady-state rolling contacts: a generalized boundary element formulation for conformal and non-conformal geometries. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 171 (2023). A vailable from: https://doi...

    2023

  19. [26]

    Simulating gear and bearing interactions in the presence of faults: Part I

    Sawalhi N, Randall RB. Simulating gear and bearing interactions in the presence of faults: Part I. The combined gear–bearing dynamic model and the simulation of localised bearing faults. Mech Syst Signal Process 22(8):1924–1951 (2008). A vailable from: https://doi.org/10.1016/...

    1924 doi

  20. [27]

    Advanced bearing diagnostics: a comparative study of two powerful approaches

    Abboud D, Elbadaoui M, Smith W A, Randall RB. Advanced bearing diagnostics: a comparative study of two powerful approaches. Mech Syst Signal Process 114:604–627 (2019). A vailable from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.05.011

    2019 doi

  21. [28]

    Nonlinear dynamic analysis of supporting bearings in a rotor–bearing system considering vibration interaction

    Liu Y, Yan C, Shi J, et al. Nonlinear dynamic analysis of supporting bearings in a rotor–bearing system considering vibration interaction. Nonlinear Dyn 113:22435–22458 (2025). A vailable from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-025-11350-6

    2025 doi

  22. [29]

    Dynamic characteristic analysis of a gear–rotor–bearing coupling system considering bearing fit

    Zeng Q, Liu Y, Du W, et al. Dynamic characteristic analysis of a gear–rotor–bearing coupling system considering bearing fit. Nonlinear Dyn 113:2131–2154 (2025). A vailable from: https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s11071-024-10290-x

    2025 doi

  23. [30]

    Slip in the rolling contact of two dissimilar elastic rollers

    Bentall R, Johnson K. Slip in the rolling contact of two dissimilar elastic rollers. Int J Mech Sci 9:389-404 (1967)

    1967

  24. [31]

    Tractive rolling of dissimilar elastic cylinders

    Nowell D, Hills D. Tractive rolling of dissimilar elastic cylinders. Int J Mech Sci 30:427-439 (1988)

    1988

  25. [32]

    Transient phenomena in two elastic cylinders rolling over each other with dry friction

    Kalker JJ. Transient phenomena in two elastic cylinders rolling over each other with dry friction. J Appl Mech 37(3):677–688 (1970). A vailable from: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3408597

    1970 doi

  26. [33]

    Transient rolling contact phenomena

    Kalker JJ. Transient rolling contact phenomena. ASLE Trans 14(3):177–184 (1971). A vailable from: https://doi.org/10.1080/05698197108983240

    1971 doi

  27. [34]

    On the Rolling Contact of Two Elastic Bodies in the Presence of Dry Friction

    Kalker JJ. On the Rolling Contact of Two Elastic Bodies in the Presence of Dry Friction. PhD thesis, TH Delft (1967)

    1967

  28. [35]

    The rolling contact of a rigid cylinder with a viscoelastic half space

    Hunter SC. The rolling contact of a rigid cylinder with a viscoelastic half space. Trans. ASME, Ser. E, J. Appl. Mech. 28:611–617 (1961)

    1961

  29. [36]

    Contact problem of rolling of a viscoelastic cylinder on a base of the same ma- terial

    Goryacheva I. Contact problem of rolling of a viscoelastic cylinder on a base of the same ma- terial. J. Appl. Math. Mech. 37(5), 925933 (1973). A vailable from: https://doi.org/10.1016/ 0021-8928(73)90017-8

    1973

  30. [37]

    Three-dimensional Contact of a Rigid Roller Traversing a Viscoelastic Half Space

    Panek C, Kalker JJ. Three-dimensional Contact of a Rigid Roller Traversing a Viscoelastic Half Space. J. Inst. Maths Applies 26:299-313 (1980)

    1980

  31. [38]

    Viscoelastic Multilayered Cylinders Rolling With Dry Friction

    Kalker JJ. Viscoelastic Multilayered Cylinders Rolling With Dry Friction. ASME. J. Appl. Mech. September 58(3):666–679 (1991). A vailable from: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2897247

    1991 doi

  32. [39]

    Contact Mechanics

    Johnson KL. Contact Mechanics. Cambridge University Press (1985). A vailable from: https://doi. org/10.1017/CBO9781139171731

    1985 doi

  33. [40]

    Contact Mechanics in Tribology

    Goryacheva IG. Contact Mechanics in Tribology. Springer (1998)

    1998

  34. [41]

    Contact Mechanics

    Barber JR. Contact Mechanics. Springer (2018). A vailable from: https://doi.org/10.1007/ 978-3-319-70939-0

    2018

  35. [42]

    User Guide for CONTACT

    Vollebregt EAH. User Guide for CONTACT. Technical report TR09-03 (version 13)

  36. [43]

    F ASTSIM2: a second-order accurate frictional rolling con- tact algorithm

    Vollebregt EAH, Wilders P. F ASTSIM2: a second-order accurate frictional rolling con- tact algorithm. Comput Mech 47:105–116 (2011). A vailable from: https://doi.org/10.1007/ s00466-010-0536-7

    2011

  37. [44]

    Assessing the accuracy of simplified frictional rolling contact algorithms

    Vollebregt EAH, Iwnicki SD, Xie G, Shackelton P. Assessing the accuracy of simplified frictional rolling contact algorithms. Veh Syst Dyn 50(1):1–17 (2012). A vailable from: https://doi.org/10. 1080/00423114.2011.552618

    2012

  38. [45]

    Numerical modeling of measured railway creep–force curves with CONTACT

    Vollebregt EAH. Numerical modeling of measured railway creep–force curves with CONTACT. Wear 314:87–95 (2014). A vailable from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2013.11.030

    2014 doi

  39. [46]

    New Developments in the Theory of Wheel/Rail Contact Mechanics

    Nielsen JB. New Developments in the Theory of Wheel/Rail Contact Mechanics. PhD thesis, Tech- nical University of Denmark (1998). A vailable from: https://orbit.dtu.dk/en/publications/ 29 new-developments-in-the-theory-of-wheelrail-contact-mechanics

    1998

  40. [47]

    Transient rolling of cylindrical contacts with constant and linearly in- creasing applied slip

    Dahlberg J, Alfredsson B. Transient rolling of cylindrical contacts with constant and linearly in- creasing applied slip. Wear 266:316–326 (2009). A vailable from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear. 2008.07.008

    2009 doi

  41. [48]

    Contact Mechanics in Tribology

    Goryacheva IG. Contact Mechanics in Tribology. 1st ed. Springer Dordrecht (2010). A vailable from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9048-8

    2010 doi

  42. [49]

    Contact characteristics of a rolling/sliding cylinder and a viscoelastic layer bonded to an elastic substrate

    Goryacheva I, Sadeghi F. Contact characteristics of a rolling/sliding cylinder and a viscoelastic layer bonded to an elastic substrate. Wear 184(2):125-132 (1995). A vailable from: https://doi.org/10. 1016/0043-1648(94)06561-6

    1995

  43. [50]

    Goryacheva IG, Yakovenko AA: Indentation of a rigid cylinder with a flat rough base into a thin viscoelastic layer. J. Appl. Mech. Tech. Phys., 62(5):723–735 (2021)

    2021

  44. [51]

    Sliding of a spherical indenter on a viscoelastic foundation with the forces of molecular attraction taken into account

    Goryacheva IG, Gubenko MM, Makhovskaya YY. Sliding of a spherical indenter on a viscoelastic foundation with the forces of molecular attraction taken into account. Prikl. J. Appl. Mech. Tech. Phys., 55(1):81–88 (2014)

    2014

  45. [52]

    On the rolling contact problem of two elastic solids with graded coatings

    Güler MA, Alinia Y, Adibnazari S. On the rolling contact problem of two elastic solids with graded coatings. Int J Mech Sci 64:62-81 (2012)

    2012

  46. [53]

    Subsurface stress evolution under orthotropic wear and frictional contact conditions

    Juliá JM, Rodríguez-Tembleque L. Subsurface stress evolution under orthotropic wear and frictional contact conditions. Int J Mech Sci 234:107695 (2022)

    2022

  47. [54]

    Wear and subsurface stress evolution in tractive rolling contact

    Juliá JM, Rodríguez-Tembleque L. Wear and subsurface stress evolution in tractive rolling contact. Int J Mech Sci 294, 110195, ISSN 0020-7403 (2025)

    2025

  48. [55]

    Simplified theory of rolling contact

    Kalker JJ. Simplified theory of rolling contact. Delft Progress Report, Series C (1973), 1–10

    1973

  49. [56]

    Railway wheel and automotive tyre

    Kalker JJ. Railway wheel and automotive tyre. Veh Syst Dyn 5(15):255–269 (1979)

    1979

  50. [57]

    Short-wavelength rail corrugation and non-steady-state contact mechanics

    Knothe K, Groß-Thebing A. Short-wavelength rail corrugation and non-steady-state contact mechanics. Veh Syst Dyn 46(1–2):49–66 (2008). A vailable from: https://doi.org/10.1080/ 00423110701590180

    2008

  51. [58]

    Non-steady-state modelling of wheel–rail contact for dynamic simulation of railway vehicles

    Alonso A, Giménez JG. Non-steady-state modelling of wheel–rail contact for dynamic simulation of railway vehicles. Veh Syst Dyn 46(3):179–196 (2008). A vailable from: https://doi.org/10.1080/ 00423110701248011

    2008

  52. [59]

    Non-steady-state modelling of wheel–rail contact

    Guiral A, Alonso A, Baeza L, Giménez JG. Non-steady-state modelling of wheel–rail contact. Veh Syst Dyn 51(1):91–108 (2013). A vailable from: https://doi.org/10.1080/00423114.2012. 713499

    2013

  53. [60]

    Influence of longitudinal creepage and wheel inertia on short-pitch corruga- tion

    Ciavarella M, Barber J. Influence of longitudinal creepage and wheel inertia on short-pitch corruga- tion. Proc IMechE Part J: Eng Tribol 222(3) (2008). A vailable from: https://doi.org/10.1243/ 13506501JET373

    2008

  54. [61]

    Short-pitch rail corrugation: a resonance-free regime? Wear 266:9–10 (2008)

    Afferrante L, Ciavarella M. Short-pitch rail corrugation: a resonance-free regime? Wear 266:9–10 (2008). A vailable from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2008.12.003

    2008 doi

  55. [63]

    A model of the transient behavior of tractive rolling contacts

    Al-Bender F, De Moerlooze K. A model of the transient behavior of tractive rolling contacts. Ad- vances in Tribology (2008). A vailable from: https://doi.org/10.1155/2008/214894

    2008 doi

  56. [65]

    Analytical results in transient brush tyre models: theory for large camber angles and classic solutions with limited friction

    Romano L, Timpone F, Bruzelius F, Jacobson B. Analytical results in transient brush tyre models: theory for large camber angles and classic solutions with limited friction. Meccanica 57:165–191 (2022). A vailable from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11012-021-01422-3

    2022 doi

  57. [66]

    Rolling, tilting and spinning spherical wheels: analytical results using brush theory

    Romano L, Timpone F, Bruzelius F, Jacobson B. Rolling, tilting and spinning spherical wheels: analytical results using brush theory. Mechanism and Machine Theory 173:104836 (2022). A vailable from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2022.104836

    2022

  58. [67]

    An extended LuGre-brush tyre model for large camber angles and turning speeds

    Romano L, Bruzelius F, Jacobson B. An extended LuGre-brush tyre model for large camber angles and turning speeds. Veh Syst Dyn (2022). A vailable from: https://doi.org/10.1080/00423114. 2022.2086887

    2022

  59. [68]

    Transient wheel–rail rolling contact theories

    Romano L, Maglio M, Bruni S. Transient wheel–rail rolling contact theories. Tribology International (2023)

    2023

  60. [69]

    The model of dry friction in the problem of rolling rigid bodies

    Zhuravlev VP. The model of dry friction in the problem of rolling rigid bodies. J Appl Math Mech 62(5):705–710 (1998)

    1998

  61. [70]

    Friction laws in the case of combination of slip and spin

    Zhuravlev VP. Friction laws in the case of combination of slip and spin. Mech Solids 38(4):52–58 (2003). 30

    2003

  62. [71]

    About the motion of a symmetric rigid solid on a plane

    Kireenkov AA. About the motion of a symmetric rigid solid on a plane. Proc. 8th Conf. DSTA, 95–102 (2005)

    2005

  63. [72]

    Combined model of sliding and rolling friction in the dynamics of bodies on a rough plane

    Kireenkov AA. Combined model of sliding and rolling friction in the dynamics of bodies on a rough plane. Mech Solids 43(3):412–425 (2008)

    2008

  64. [73]

    A new model for control of systems with friction

    Canudas-de-Wit C, Olsson H, Åström KJ, Lischinsky P. A new model for control of systems with friction. IEEE Trans Autom Control 40(3):419–425 (1995)

    1995

  65. [74]

    Control Systems with Friction

    Olsson H. Control Systems with Friction. Doctoral thesis, Lund Institute of Technology (1996)

    1996

  66. [75]

    Revisiting the LuGre friction model

    Åström KJ, Canudas-de-Wit C. Revisiting the LuGre friction model. IEEE Control Syst Mag 28(6):101–114 (2008)

    2008

  67. [76]

    A new dynamic multi d.o.f

    Sorine M, Szymanski J. A new dynamic multi d.o.f. tire model. Transportation Systems 2000, Braun- schweig (2000)

    2000

  68. [77]

    Dynamic tire friction models for vehicle traction control

    Canudas-de-Wit C, Tsiotras P. Dynamic tire friction models for vehicle traction control. Proc. 38th IEEE CDC, 3746–3751 (1999). A vailable from: https//doi:10.1109/CDC.1999.827937

    1999

  69. [78]

    Dynamic friction models for road/tire longitudinal interaction

    Canudas-de-Wit C, Tsiotras P, Velenis E, et al. Dynamic friction models for road/tire longitudinal interaction. Veh Syst Dyn 39(3):189–226 (2003). A vailable from: https//doi:10.1076/vesd.39.3. 189.14152

    2003 doi

  70. [79]

    Dynamic tyre friction models for combined slip

    Velenis E, Tsiotras P, Canudas-de-Wit C, Sorine M. Dynamic tyre friction models for combined slip. Veh Syst Dyn 43:3–29 (2005). A vailable from: https//doi:10.1080/00423110412331290464

    2005 doi

  71. [80]

    Modeling and analysis of longitudinal tire dynamics based on the LuGre friction model

    Deur J. Modeling and analysis of longitudinal tire dynamics based on the LuGre friction model. IF AC Proc Vol 34(1):91–96 (2001). A vailable from: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-6670(17) 34383-5

    2001 doi

  72. [81]

    A 3D brush-type dynamic tire friction model

    Deur J, Asgari J, Hrovat D. A 3D brush-type dynamic tire friction model. Veh Syst Dyn 42(3):133– 173 (2004). A vailable from: https://doi.org/10.1080/00423110412331282887

    2004 doi

  73. [82]

    Extensions of the LuGre tyre friction model for vari- able slip speed

    Deur J, Ivanović V, Troulis M, et al. Extensions of the LuGre tyre friction model for vari- able slip speed. Veh Syst Dyn 43(1):508–524 (2005). A vailable from: https//doi:10.1080/ 00423110500229808

    2005

  74. [83]

    An integrated friction model with improved presliding behavior

    Swevers J, Al-Bender F, Ganseman CG, Projogo T. An integrated friction model with improved presliding behavior. IEEE Trans Autom Control 45(4):675–686 (2000)

    2000

  75. [84]

    Modification of the Leuven integrated friction model

    Lampaert V, Swevers J, Al-Bender F. Modification of the Leuven integrated friction model. IEEE Trans Autom Control 47(4):683–687 (2002)

    2002

  76. [85]

    Elasto-plastic friction model: contact compliance and stiction

    Dupont P, Armstrong B, Hayward V. Elasto-plastic friction model: contact compliance and stiction. Proc. 2000 American Control Conference, 1072–1077 (2000)

    2000

  77. [86]

    Single-state elasto-plastic friction models

    Dupont P, Hayward V, Armstrong B, et al. Single-state elasto-plastic friction models. IEEE Trans Autom Control 47:787–792 (2002)

    2002

  78. [87]

    First-order friction models with bristle dynamics: lumped and distributed formulations, arXiv:2602.09429

    Romano L, Aamo OM, Åslund J, Frisk E. First-order friction models with bristle dynamics: lumped and distributed formulations, arXiv:2602.09429. Under review at IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol (2025)

    2025

  79. [89]

    Nonlinear mathematical modeling of frequency- temperature dependent viscoelastic materials for tire applications

    Sakhnevych A, Maglione R, Suero R, et al. Nonlinear mathematical modeling of frequency- temperature dependent viscoelastic materials for tire applications. Nonlinear Dyn 112:21729–21750 (2024). A vailable from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-024-10175-z

    2024 doi

  80. [90]

    Introduction to polymer viscoelasticity

    Shaw MT, MacKnight WJ. Introduction to polymer viscoelasticity. Wiley, Amsterdam (2018)

    2018

  81. [91]

    The science and technology of rubber

    Mark JE, Erman B, Roland M. The science and technology of rubber. Academic press, London (2013)

    2013

  82. [92]

    Engineering viscoelasticity

    Gutierrez-Lemini D. Engineering viscoelasticity. Springer, New York (2014)

    2014

  83. [93]

    Three-dimensional rolling/sliding contact on a viscoelastic layered half-space

    Wallace ER, Chaise T, Nelias D. Three-dimensional rolling/sliding contact on a viscoelastic layered half-space. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 143, 104067 (2020)

    2020

  84. [94]

    A novel methodology to predict sliding and rolling friction of viscoelastic materials: Theory and experiments

    Carbone G, Putignano P. A novel methodology to predict sliding and rolling friction of viscoelastic materials: Theory and experiments. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 61(8):1822-1834 (2013)

    2013

  85. [95]

    Rolling contact of a rigid sphere/sliding of a spherical indenter upon a viscoelastic half-space containing an ellipsoidal inhomogeneity

    Koumi KE, Chaise T, Nelias D. Rolling contact of a rigid sphere/sliding of a spherical indenter upon a viscoelastic half-space containing an ellipsoidal inhomogeneity. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 80:1-25 (2015)

    2015

  86. [96]

    Viscoelastic models revisited: characteristics and interconversion formulas for generalized Kelvin–Voigt and Maxwell models

    Serra-Aguila A, Puigoriol-Forcada JM, Reyes G, et al. Viscoelastic models revisited: characteristics and interconversion formulas for generalized Kelvin–Voigt and Maxwell models. Acta Mech. Sin. 35:1191–1209 (2019). A vailable from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10409-019-00895-6

    2019 doi

  87. [97]

    Interconversion of Prony series for relaxation and creep

    Loy RJ, de Hoog FR, Anderssen RS. Interconversion of Prony series for relaxation and creep. J. Rheol. 59, 1261–1270 (2015). 31

    2015

  88. [98]

    An equivalence between generalized Maxwell model and fractional Zener model, Mechanics of Materials 100:148-153 (2016)

    Xiao R, Sun H, Chen W. An equivalence between generalized Maxwell model and fractional Zener model, Mechanics of Materials 100:148-153 (2016). A vailable from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j. mechmat.2016.06.016

    2016 doi

  89. [99]

    Fractional operator viscoelastic models in dynamic problems of mechanics of solids: a review

    Shitikova M. Fractional operator viscoelastic models in dynamic problems of mechanics of solids: a review. Mech. solids 57:1–33 (2022)

    2022

  90. [100]

    Fractional calculus in viscoelasticity: an experimental study

    Meral F, Royston T, Magin R. Fractional calculus in viscoelasticity: an experimental study. Com- mun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 15:939–945 (2010)

    2010

  91. [101]

    Quantifying the consistency and rheology of liquid foods using fractional calculus

    Wagner CE, Barbati AC, Engmann J, et al. Quantifying the consistency and rheology of liquid foods using fractional calculus. Food Hydrocoll. 69:242–254 (2017)

    2017

  92. [102]

    Semigroups of Linear Operators and Applications to PDEs

    Pazy A. Semigroups of Linear Operators and Applications to PDEs. Springer, New York (1983). A vailable from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5561-1

    1983 doi

  93. [103]

    Equations of Evolution

    Tanabe H. Equations of Evolution. Pitman, London (1979)

    1979

  94. [104]

    Functional Analytic Methods for Partial Differential Equations

    Tanabe H. Functional Analytic Methods for Partial Differential Equations. CRC Press (1997)

    1997

  95. [105]

    Advanced Calculus of Several Variables, Vol

    Edwards CH. Advanced Calculus of Several Variables, Vol. III – Successive Approximations and Implicit Functions. Academic Press (1973)

    1973

  96. [106]

    Phase portraits and bifurcations induced by static and dynamic friction models

    Bekesi BJ, Antali M, Csernak G. Phase portraits and bifurcations induced by static and dynamic friction models. Nonlinear Dyn 13:15863–15899 (2025). A vailable from: https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11071-025-10974-y

    2025

  97. [107]

    LuGre or not LuGre

    Rill G, Schaeffer T, Schuderer M. LuGre or not LuGre. Multibody Syst Dyn 60:191–218 (2024). A vailable from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11044-023-09909-5

    2024 doi

  98. [108]

    Theory of rubber friction and contact mechanics

    Persson BNJ. Theory of rubber friction and contact mechanics. The Journal of Chemical Physics 115(8):3840-3861 (2001). A vailable from: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1388626

    2001 doi

  99. [109]

    Rubber friction: role of the flash temperature

    Persson BNJ. Rubber friction: role of the flash temperature. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 18 7789 (2006). A vailable from: https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/18/32/025

    2006 doi

  100. [110]

    A thermo-frictional tyre model including the effect of flash temperature

    Mavros G. A thermo-frictional tyre model including the effect of flash temperature. Vehicle Sys- tem Dynamics, 57(5):721-751 (2019). A vailable from: https://doi.org/10.1080/00423114.2018. 1484147

    2019

  101. [111]

    Delay effects in shimmy dynamics of wheels with stretched string-like tyres

    Takács D, Orosz G, Stépán G. Delay effects in shimmy dynamics of wheels with stretched string-like tyres. Eur J Mech A/Solids 28(3):516–525 (2009)

    2009

  102. [112]

    Micro-shimmy of towed structures in unstable parameter domains

    Takács D, Stépán G. Micro-shimmy of towed structures in unstable parameter domains. Veh Syst Dyn 50(11):1613–1630 (2012)

    2012

  103. [113]

    Large amplitude periodic motions of towed rigid wheels

    Takács D, Stépán G, Hogan SJ. Large amplitude periodic motions of towed rigid wheels. Nonlinear Dyn 52:27–34 (2008). A vailable from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-007-9253-y

    2008 doi

  104. [114]

    Experiments on quasiperiodic wheel shimmy

    Takács D, Stépán G. Experiments on quasiperiodic wheel shimmy. J Comput Nonlinear Dyn 4(3):031007 (2009). A vailable from: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3124786

    2009 doi

  105. [115]

    Contact patch memory of tyres leading to lateral vibrations of vehicles

    Takács D, Stépán G. Contact patch memory of tyres leading to lateral vibrations of vehicles. Phil Trans R Soc A 371:20120427 (2013). A vailable from: http://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2012.0427

    2013

  106. [116]

    Stability analysis of linear single-track models with tran- sient tyre dynamics

    Romano L, Aamo OM, Åslund J, Frisk E. Stability analysis of linear single-track models with tran- sient tyre dynamics. Veh Syst Dyn (2024). A vailable from: https://doi.org/10.1080/00423114. 2024.2445163

    2024

  107. [117]

    Semilinear single-track models with distributed tyre friction dynamics

    Romano L, Aamo OM, Åslund J, Frisk E. Semilinear single-track models with distributed tyre friction dynamics. Nonlinear Dyn (2025)

    2025

  108. [118]

    The relaxation length concept at large wheel slip and camber

    Higuchi A, Pacejka HB. The relaxation length concept at large wheel slip and camber. Veh Syst Dyn 25(sup001):50–64 (1997). A vailable from: https://doi.org/10.1080/00423119708969644

    1997 doi

  109. [119]

    Simple contact calculation for handling tyre models

    Rill G. Simple contact calculation for handling tyre models. Multibody Syst Dyn 45:131–153 (2019). A vailable from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11044-018-9629-4

    2019 doi

  110. [120]

    Modelling transient response using PAC 2002-based tyre model

    Shaju A, Pandey AK. Modelling transient response using PAC 2002-based tyre model. Veh Syst Dyn (2020). A vailable from: https://doi.org/10.1080/00423114.2020.1802048. A Model parametrisation This appendix outlines a practical procedure for parametrising the FrBD n+1 models bas...

    2002

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.