{"as_of":"2026-08-19T12:56:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:ea865c708b006efa5b64e629df62aac3bc1a49eaccd861e2240738600338a47b","coverage":[{"denominator":0,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":1,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":1,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T13:13:05.897464Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"pith","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T13:13:05.986153Z","state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2602.10976","last_updated":"2026-08-13T15:28:04Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-19T08:58:18.656048Z","submitted_at":"2026-02-11T16:06:56Z","title":"Physically Consistent Evaluation of Commonly Used Near-Field Models","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2602.10976","doi":null,"metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"2602.10976","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T13:13:05.986153Z","title":"Physically Consistent Evaluation of Commonly Used Near-Field Models","venue":"eess.SP","work_id":"83ad4c65-0da2-4508-bec7-bd5f10499425","year":2026},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2608.13350","last_updated":"2026-08-13T15:17:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T23:12:49.422999Z","submitted_at":"2026-08-13T15:17:12Z","title":"A Physically Consistent Assessment of Nearfield Beamfocusing into Occluded Regions","version":1},"reference_index":6,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T13:13:05.897464Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2602.10976","citing_paper":"/paper/2608.13350"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b77b84c5072bbfc1fc82d08885658081309827944df6db065c6fcf51faa446bb","observation_id":"3e141fbc-1415-4d2f-b470-732b01e1dcf1","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T13:13:05.995807Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:39.956319+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}}],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2602.10976/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2602.10976/integrity","json":"/paper/2602.10976/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2602.10976"},"outbound":[],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2602.10976","last_updated":"2026-08-13T15:28:04Z","latest_version":2,"primary_category":"eess.SP","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-19T08:58:18.656048Z","submitted_at":"2026-02-11T16:06:56Z","title":"Physically Consistent Evaluation of Commonly Used Near-Field Models"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":0,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":0,"verified_exact":0,"verified_fuzzy":0},"total_outbound_references":0},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:39.956319+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 19 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 1 inbound Pith citation observation for arXiv:2602.10976."}