{"as_of":"2026-08-04T07:56:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:c9a09c1963bd8b325deccc1cc7b032a59db0372aab3460dbfc667be2e7e63a8a","coverage":[{"denominator":0,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":1,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:34:03.388597+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":1,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-01T06:18:05.062000Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"cited_works","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2603.02473","last_updated":"2026-04-12T04:29:09Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T22:47:37.679205Z","submitted_at":"2026-03-02T23:47:23Z","title":"Diagnosing Retrieval vs. Utilization Bottlenecks in LLM Agent Memory","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2603.02473","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-01T06:18:05.062000Z","title":"Diagnosing retrieval vs","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2026},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.21962","last_updated":"2026-07-24T04:19:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:52:50.206319Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-24T04:19:45Z","title":"Ground Truth First: A Longitudinal Evaluation Instrument for Agent Memory, and the Tenure Crossover in Memory-Architecture Rankings","version":1},"reference_index":51,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-01T06:18:05.062000Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2603.02473","citing_paper":"/paper/2607.21962"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f649d346ad44ee95e0366a70f95d175c4c14befbb881638249217cf9d9147fd9","observation_id":"37f66ec5-eb8c-4044-b6b2-c40dcc029a3f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-01T06:18:05.062000Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}}],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2603.02473/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2603.02473/integrity","json":"/paper/2603.02473/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2603.02473"},"outbound":[],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2603.02473","last_updated":"2026-04-12T04:29:09Z","latest_version":2,"primary_category":"cs.AI","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T22:47:37.679205Z","submitted_at":"2026-03-02T23:47:23Z","title":"Diagnosing Retrieval vs. Utilization Bottlenecks in LLM Agent Memory"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":0,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":0,"verified_exact":0,"verified_fuzzy":0},"total_outbound_references":0},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:34:03.388597+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:33:57.428241+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 4 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 1 inbound Pith citation observation for arXiv:2603.02473."}