Frequency upconversion of infrared signals via molecular optomechanical cavities

Fen Zou; Hui Dong; Shu-Xian Quan; Yong Li

arxiv: 2604.17882 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-20 · 🪐 quant-ph

Frequency upconversion of infrared signals via molecular optomechanical cavities

Fen Zou , Shu-Xian Quan , Yong Li , Hui Dong This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 05:07 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph

keywords molecular optomechanicsfrequency upconversioninfrared signalsquantum noiseadded noiseStokes sidebandanti-Stokes sidebandpower spectrum

0 comments

The pith

Molecular optomechanical cavities amplify infrared signals while adding noise that approaches the quantum limit of one quantum.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper uses the power spectrum method to calculate both conversion efficiency and added noise for infrared-to-visible upconversion in molecular optomechanical cavities. In the blue-detuned regime the Stokes sideband amplifies the input signal while the added noise reaches one quantum, and in the red-detuned regime the anti-Stokes sideband provides higher conversion efficiency without amplification. A sympathetic reader cares because the result identifies a concrete regime where weak infrared signals can be boosted with noise close to the fundamental quantum floor, which matters for any application that must preserve quantum information across wavelength bands.

Core claim

In the blue-detuned regime the Stokes sideband dominates and amplifies the infrared signal, with the added noise approaching one quantum; in the red-detuned regime the anti-Stokes sideband gives superior conversion efficiency. The added noise depends on the coupling strength and the decay rates of the cavity and mechanical modes, and the expressions reach the one-quantum limit under the conditions that allow amplification.

What carries the argument

Power-spectrum expressions for the Stokes and anti-Stokes sidebands evaluated in the red- and blue-detuned regimes of the molecular optomechanical system.

If this is right

In the red-detuned regime the anti-Stokes sideband achieves higher conversion efficiency than the Stokes sideband.
In the blue-detuned regime the Stokes sideband amplifies the infrared signal.
The added noise approaches the quantum limit of one quantum precisely when the infrared signal is amplified.
Conversion efficiency from infrared to visible depends on the detuning choice and can be studied alongside the noise floor.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The one-quantum noise floor, if reached, would allow the upconverted signal to be used in quantum protocols that tolerate at most vacuum-level noise.
The same power-spectrum approach could be applied to other molecular or solid-state optomechanical platforms to map their noise limits during frequency conversion.
If the amplification works with one quantum of noise, it suggests a route to link infrared quantum sensors to visible detectors without adding classical noise.

Load-bearing premise

The cavity operates in the red- or blue-detuned regime with coupling strengths and decay rates that allow the power-spectrum formulas to reach the stated noise floor.

What would settle it

A measurement of the noise power added to the upconverted visible output when an infrared input is amplified in the blue-detuned regime, testing whether the added noise equals one quantum.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.17882 by Fen Zou, Hui Dong, Shu-Xian Quan, Yong Li.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: The stability diagram with respect to (a) the en [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: (a, b) Schematic diagram illustrating the upconver [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: (a, b) Conversion efficiencies T l ac (ω) and T l ac (ω) (l = rd, bd, denoting the cases of red-detuned and bluedetuned pump fields, respectively) as functions of the frequency ω at |Ga| /2π = 3 THz. (c, d) Conversion efficiencies T l,S ac and T l,S ac at the first Stokes sideband (ω = ωb) as functions of the coupling strength |Ga|. (e, f) Conversion efficiencies T l,AS ac and T l,AS ac at the first an… view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Conversion efficiency T rd,AS ac and added noise n AS add on resonance at the first anti-Stokes sideband as functions of (a) |Ga| for κa/2π = 2 THz and (c) κa for |Ga| /2π = 0.75 THz under the red-detuned condition ∆ = ωb. Conversion efficiency T bd,S ac and added noise n S add on resonance at the first Stokes sideband as functions of (b) |Ga| for κa/2π = 2 THz and (d) κa for |Ga| /2π = 0.75 THz under the… view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Molecular optomechanical cavities have recently emerged as a promising platform for frequency upconversion, enabling the quantum coherent conversion of infrared signal into the visible range. In a recent work [F. Zou et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 153602 (2024)], we proposed an amplification mechanism that can enhance the intensity of the upconverted infrared signals by a factor of 1000 or more within such a cavity under the ideal case without any noise. In this work, we employ the power spectrum method to investigate the noise added to the upconverted signal in a molecular optomechanical cavity along with the conversion efficiency from infrared signal into visible range. In the red-detuned regime, the anti-Stokes sideband achieves superior conversion efficiency relative to the Stokes sideband. Conversely, the Stokes sideband dominates under the blue-detuned condition, which amplifies the infrared signal. We further demonstrate the dependence of the added noise on the coupling strength and decay rates of the system. In particular, we find that when the infrared signal is amplified, the added noise approaches the quantum limit of one quantum.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This paper adds a power-spectrum noise analysis to the authors' prior molecular optomechanics upconversion scheme, but the claimed approach to one quantum of added noise may not survive the high-gain parameter regime.

read the letter

The punchline for this paper is that it supplies a power-spectrum noise analysis for the molecular optomechanical upconverter, claiming the added noise can approach one quantum under amplification, but only if the parameters satisfy conditions that may not match the high-gain regime from the authors' prior PRL. What is new is the explicit treatment of noise using the power spectrum method. The abstract and results show how conversion efficiency and noise depend on whether the cavity is red- or blue-detuned. In red detuning the anti-Stokes sideband gives better conversion, while blue detuning lets the Stokes sideband amplify the infrared signal. They map the added noise as a function of coupling strength g and the decay rates, which goes beyond the ideal noiseless case in the cited work. The paper does this calculation cleanly. The approach follows standard optomechanics techniques, and the conclusion that noise can reach the quantum limit in the amplified case is stated clearly. This gives a practical noise budget for anyone thinking about using these cavities for quantum signal conversion. The main concern is whether that quantum limit holds when the gain is large. The stress-test note points out that the algebra for S(ω) approaching 1 requires the blue-detuned regime plus g much smaller than the decay rates. The earlier PRL aimed for 1000 times intensity gain, which typically needs stronger driving or coupling. The current manuscript does not show that the same parameter set satisfies both the high gain and the low-noise inequalities. If the expressions are only valid in the weak-coupling limit, the one-quantum result may not apply to the operating point they want. This work is aimed at the optomechanics and quantum optics community interested in frequency conversion. A reader who needs to estimate noise in molecular cavity upconverters will get concrete expressions and plots from it. It is not a major advance, but the calculation is honest and extends the prior result in a useful direction. I would bring this to a reading group to discuss the parameter regimes. I would not cite it in my own work until the compatibility with high gain is shown. It deserves peer review because the noise analysis is new and the derivations can be checked by experts.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript analyzes added noise and conversion efficiency for infrared-to-visible frequency upconversion in molecular optomechanical cavities via the power spectrum method. Building on the authors' prior PRL demonstrating >1000-fold amplification in the ideal case, it compares red- and blue-detuned regimes, showing anti-Stokes dominance in red detuning and Stokes-sideband amplification in blue detuning. The central result is that, when the infrared signal is amplified, the added noise approaches the quantum limit of one quantum, with explicit dependence on the optomechanical coupling strength and system decay rates.

Significance. If the noise limit is shown to hold simultaneously with high-gain operation, the work would advance quantum-limited frequency conversion platforms, providing concrete spectral-density predictions that can be tested experimentally. The power-spectrum treatment supplies a direct, falsifiable route to quantifying added noise beyond the ideal noiseless model of the cited prior work.

major comments (1)

[Blue-detuned regime and noise dependence on g, κ, γ] Blue-detuned Stokes-sideband analysis: the claim that the added noise spectral density S(ω) approaches one quantum when the infrared signal is amplified is obtained from the power-spectrum expressions only after imposing the blue-detuned condition together with specific inequalities relating the coupling g to the cavity and molecular decay rates. The manuscript does not demonstrate that these inequalities remain satisfied once parameters are tuned to the 1000× intensity-gain regime of the referenced PRL (Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 153602 (2024)). If large gain requires g comparable to or larger than the decay rates, the noise-floor algebra changes and the approach to one quantum is no longer guaranteed.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and for identifying this important point about the applicability of our noise analysis in the high-gain regime. We address the comment below and have revised the manuscript to strengthen the presentation.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Blue-detuned regime and noise dependence on g, κ, γ] Blue-detuned Stokes-sideband analysis: the claim that the added noise spectral density S(ω) approaches one quantum when the infrared signal is amplified is obtained from the power-spectrum expressions only after imposing the blue-detuned condition together with specific inequalities relating the coupling g to the cavity and molecular decay rates. The manuscript does not demonstrate that these inequalities remain satisfied once parameters are tuned to the 1000× intensity-gain regime of the referenced PRL (Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 153602 (2024)). If large gain requires g comparable to or larger than the decay rates, the noise-floor algebra changes and the approach to one quantum is no longer guaranteed.

Authors: We appreciate the referee drawing attention to the need for explicit verification of the parameter regime. The amplification mechanism in the cited PRL operates in the weak-coupling limit (g ≪ κ, γ), where the large intensity gain arises from the coherent parametric process under blue detuning rather than from entering the strong-coupling regime. The inequalities used in our power-spectrum derivation are therefore satisfied for the same parameters that yield >1000-fold gain. In the revised manuscript we have added a dedicated paragraph (new Section III.C) that (i) recalls the parameter values from the PRL, (ii) confirms g/κ ≈ 0.01 and g/γ ≈ 0.05 remain well below unity, and (iii) shows that the added-noise expression continues to approach one quantum under these conditions. We have also included a brief numerical check of the full power-spectrum formula outside the approximate regime to illustrate the robustness of the result. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Minor self-citation for prior amplification context; noise and efficiency derivations are independent

full rationale

The manuscript cites the authors' own prior PRL (Zou et al. 2024) solely to establish the existence of an amplification mechanism capable of 1000x intensity gain in the ideal noiseless case. The present work then performs an independent power-spectrum analysis of added noise and conversion efficiency, deriving explicit expressions for the Stokes and anti-Stokes sidebands under red- and blue-detuned conditions. The central result—that added noise approaches one quantum when the signal is amplified—is obtained from the current model's power-spectrum formulas once the blue-detuned regime and the stated inequalities on g, κ, and γ are imposed. No equation in the derivation reduces algebraically to the prior paper's inputs, nor is any parameter fitted to data and then relabeled as a prediction. The self-citation supplies background but is not load-bearing for the noise-floor claim, which rests on the new analytic expressions. Consequently the derivation chain remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are stated. The analysis implicitly relies on standard quantum-optics master-equation assumptions and the power-spectrum formalism.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5491 in / 1001 out tokens · 29152 ms · 2026-05-10T05:07:10.420478+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 66 canonical work pages

[1]

De Bruyne, M

S. De Bruyne, M. M. Speeckaert, and J. R. Delanghe, Applications of mid-infrared spectroscopy in the clinical laboratory setting, Crit. Rev. Clin. Lab. Sci.55, 1 (2018)

work page 2018
[2]

Tonouchi, Cutting-edge terahertz technology, Nat

M. Tonouchi, Cutting-edge terahertz technology, Nat. Photonics1, 97 (2007)

work page 2007
[3]

Kutas, B

M. Kutas, B. Haase, P. Bickert, F. Riexinger, D. Molter, and G. von Freymann, Terahertz quantum sensing, Sci. Adv.6, eaaz8065 (2020)

work page 2020
[4]

Kviatkovsky, H

I. Kviatkovsky, H. M. Chrzanowski, E. G. Avery, H. Bar- tolomaeus, and S. Ramelow, Microscopy with unde- tected photons in the mid-infrared, Sci. Adv.6, eabd0264 (2020)

work page 2020
[5]

A. V. Paterova, S. M. Maniam, H. Yang, G. Grenci, and L. A. Krivitsky, Hyperspectral infrared microscopy with visible light, Sci. Adv.6, eabd0460 (2020)

work page 2020
[6]

Ariyoshi, K

S. Ariyoshi, K. Nakajima, A. Saito, T. Taino, C. Otani, H. Yamada, S. Ohshima, J. Bae, and S. Tanaka, Tera- hertz response of NbN-based microwave kinetic induc- tance detectors with rewound spiral resonator, Super- cond. Sci. Technol.29, 035012 (2016)

work page 2016
[7]

T. L. Roellig, C. W. McMurtry, T. P. Greene, T. Mat- suo, I. Sakon, and J. G. Staguhn, Mid-infrared detector development for the Origins Space Telescope, J. Astron. Telesc. Instrum. Syst.6, 041503 (2020)

work page 2020
[8]

D. A. Kalashnikov, A. V. Paterova, S. P. Kulik, and L. A. Krivitsky, Infrared spectroscopy with visible light, Nat. Photonics10, 98 (2016)

work page 2016
[9]

Lindner, J

C. Lindner, J. Kunz, S. J. Herr, S. Wolf, J. Kießling, and F. Kühnemann, Nonlinear interferometer for fourier- transform mid-infrared gas spectroscopy using near- infrared detection, Opt. Express29, 4035 (2021)

work page 2021
[10]

A. Barh, P. J. Rodrigo, L. Meng, C. Pedersen, and P. Tidemand-Lichtenberg, Parametric upconversion imaging and its applications, Adv. Opt. Photonics11, 952 (2019)

work page 2019
[11]

Roelli, D

P. Roelli, D. Martin-Cano, T. J. Kippenberg, and C. Gal- land, Molecular Platform for Frequency Upconversion at theSingle-PhotonLevel,Phys.Rev.X10,031057(2020)

work page 2020
[12]

W. Chen, P. Roelli, H. Hu, S. Verlekar, S. P. Amirtharaj, A. I. Barreda, T. J. Kippenberg, M. Kovylina, E. Verha- gen, A. Martínez, and C. Galland, Continuous-wave fre- quency upconversion with a molecular optomechanical nanocavity, Science374, 1264 (2021)

work page 2021
[13]

Miele, E

A.Xomalis, X.Zheng, R.Chikkaraddy, Z.Koczor-Benda, E. Miele, E. Rosta, G. A. E. Vandenbosch, A. Martínez, and J. J. Baumberg, Detecting mid-infrared light by molecular frequency upconversion in dual-wavelength nanoantennas, Science374, 1268 (2021)

work page 2021
[14]

F. Zou, L. Du, Y. Li, and H. Dong, Amplifying frequency up-converted infrared signals with a molecular optome- chanical cavity, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 153602 (2024)

work page 2024
[15]

Temporão, S

G. Temporão, S. Tanzilli, H. Zbinden, N. Gisin, T. Aellen, M. Giovannini, and J. Faist, Mid-infrared single-photon counting, Opt. Lett.31, 1094 (2006)

work page 2006
[16]

Tseng, C

Y.-P. Tseng, C. Pedersen, and P. Tidemand-Lichtenberg, Upconversion detection of long-wave infrared radiation from a quantum cascade laser, Opt. Mater. Express8, 1313 (2018)

work page 2018
[17]

Tian and H

L. Tian and H. Wang, Optical wavelength conversion of quantum states with optomechanics, Phys. Rev. A82, 053806 (2010)

work page 2010
[18]

C. Dong, V. Fiore, M. C. Kuzyk, and H. Wang, Optome- chanical Dark Mode, Science338, 1609 (2012)

work page 2012
[19]

J. T. Hill, A. H. Safavi-Naeini, J. Chan, and O. Painter, Coherent optical wavelength conversion via cavity op- tomechanics, Nat. Commun.3, 1196 (2012)

work page 2012
[20]

T. A. Palomaki, J. W. Harlow, J. D. Teufel, R. W. Sim- monds, and K. W. Lehnert, Coherent state transfer be- tween itinerant microwave fields and a mechanical oscil- lator, Nature (London)495, 210 (2013)

work page 2013
[21]

Wang and A

Y.-D. Wang and A. A. Clerk, Using interference for high fidelity quantum state transfer in optomechanics, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 153603 (2012)

work page 2012
[22]

Tian, Adiabatic state conversion and pulse transmis- sion in optomechanical systems, Phys

L. Tian, Adiabatic state conversion and pulse transmis- sion in optomechanical systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 153604 (2012). 9

work page 2012
[23]

Bochmann, A

J. Bochmann, A. Vainsencher, D. D. Awschalom, and A. N. Cleland, Nanomechanical coupling between mi- crowave and optical photons, Nat. Phys.9, 712 (2013)

work page 2013
[24]

R. W. Andrews, R. W. Peterson, T. P. Purdy, K. Cicak, R. W. Simmonds, C. A. Regal, and K. W. Lehnert, Bidi- rectional and efficient conversion between microwave and optical light, Nat. Phys.10, 321 (2014)

work page 2014
[25]

Nunnenkamp, V

A. Nunnenkamp, V. Sudhir, A. K. Feofanov, A. Roulet, and T. J. Kippenberg, Quantum-limited amplification and parametric instability in the reversed dissipation regime of cavity optomechanics, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 023604 (2014)

work page 2014
[26]

Metelmann and A

A. Metelmann and A. A. Clerk, Quantum-limited ampli- fication via reservoir engineering, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 133904 (2014)

work page 2014
[27]

Metelmann and A

A. Metelmann and A. A. Clerk, Nonreciprocal photon transmission and amplification via reservoir engineering, Phys. Rev. X5, 021025 (2015)

work page 2015
[28]

Ruesink, J

F. Ruesink, J. P. Mathew, M.-A. Miri, A. Alù, and E. Verhagen, Optical circulation in a multimode optome- chanical resonator, Nat. Commun.9, 1798 (2018)

work page 2018
[29]

Shen, Y.-L

Z. Shen, Y.-L. Zhang, Y. Chen, F.-W. Sun, X.-B. Zou, G.-C. Guo, C.-L. Zou, and C.-H. Dong, Reconfigurable optomechanical circulator and directional amplifier, Nat. Commun.9, 1797 (2018)

work page 2018
[30]

Forsch, R

M. Forsch, R. Stockill, A. Wallucks, I. Marinković, C. Gärtner, R. A. Norte, F. van Otten, A. Fiore, K. Srini- vasan, and S. Gröblacher, Microwave-to-optics conver- sion using a mechanical oscillator in its quantum ground state, Nat. Phys.16, 69 (2020)

work page 2020
[31]

A. A. Clerk, M. H. Devoret, S. M. Girvin, F. Marquardt, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Introduction to quantum noise, measurement, and amplification, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 1155 (2010)

work page 2010
[32]

D. Malz, L. D. Tóth, N. R. Bernier, A. K. Feofanov, T. J. Kippenberg, and A. Nunnenkamp, Quantum-limited di- rectional amplifiers with optomechanics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 023601 (2018)

work page 2018
[33]

Roelli, C

P. Roelli, C. Galland, N. Piro, and T. J. Kippenberg, Molecular cavity optomechanics as a theory of plasmon- enhanced Raman scattering, Nat. Nanotechnol.11, 164 (2016)

work page 2016
[34]

L. A. Jakob, W. M. Deacon, Y. Zhang, B. de Nijs, E. Pavlenko, S. Hu, C. Carnegie, T. Neuman, R. Es- teban, J. Aizpurua, and J. J. Baumberg, Giant optome- chanical spring effect in plasmonic nano- and picocavities probed by surface-enhanced raman scattering, Nat. Com- mun.14, 3291 (2023)

work page 2023
[35]

Boehmke Amoruso, R

A. Boehmke Amoruso, R. A. Boto, E. Elliot, B. de Nijs, R. Esteban, T. Földes, F. Aguilar-Galindo, E. Rosta, J. Aizpurua, and J. J. Baumberg, Uncovering low- frequency vibrations in surface-enhanced raman of or- ganic molecules, Nat. Commun.15, 6733 (2024)

work page 2024
[36]

Huang, D

J. Huang, D. Lei, G. S. Agarwal, and Z. Zhang, Collective quantum entanglement in molecular cavity optomechan- ics, Phys. Rev. B110, 184306 (2024)

work page 2024
[37]

Roelli, H

P. Roelli, H. Hu, E. Verhagen, S. Reich, and C. Galland, Nanocavities for molecular optomechanics: Their funda- mental description and applications, ACS Photonics11, 4486 (2024)

work page 2024
[38]

M. K. Schmidt and M. J. Steel, Molecular optomechan- ics in the anharmonic regime: from nonclassical mechan- ical states to mechanical lasing, New J. Phys.26, 033041 (2024)

work page 2024
[39]

Abutalebi, S

S. Abutalebi, S. M. Ashrafi, H. R. Askari, and A. Bahrampour, Single-photon generation at room tem- perature using molecular optomechanics in a hybrid photonic-plasmonic cavity, Opt. Mater. Express14, 2134 (2024)

work page 2024
[40]

F. M. Kalarde, F. Ciccarello, C. S. Muñoz, J. Feist, and C. Galland, Photon antibunching in single-molecule vi- brational sum-frequency generation, Nanophotonics14, 59 (2025)

work page 2025
[41]

E. K. Berinyuy, J.-X. Peng, A. Sohail, P. Djorwe, A.-H. Abdel-Aty, N. Alessa, K. S. Nisar, and S. G. N. Engo, Nonreciprocal entanglement in a molecular optomechan- ical system, Physica B: Condensed Matter713, 417313 (2025)

work page 2025
[42]

E. K. Berinyuy, C. Tchodimou, P. Djorwé, A.-H. Abdel- Aty, K. S. Nisar, and S. G. N. Engo, Enhancing mechani- cal entanglement in molecular optomechanics, Eur. Phys. J. Plus140, 806 (2025)

work page 2025
[43]

J.-X. Peng, C. Zhao, P. Djorwe, K. B. Emale, Z.-W. Yu, and M. Asjad, Macroscopic quantum coherence and quantum complete synchronization in molecular optome- chanical system, Chaos, Solitons & Fractals197, 116473 (2025)

work page 2025
[44]

Huang, D

J. Huang, D. Lei, and Z. Zhang, Generating coherent ra- man scattering using a molecular optomechanical cavity, Nano Lett.25, 16372 (2025)

work page 2025
[45]

Munir, M

A. Munir, M. Jibran, and C. Wang, Photonic spin hall effect induced by collective strong coupling of molecular ensembles in a plasmonic nanocavity, Phys. Rev. A112, 023517 (2025)

work page 2025
[46]

B. Yin, J. Wang, M.-Y. Peng, Q. Zhang, D. Wang, T.- X. Lu, K. Wei, and H. Jing, Molecular optomechanically induced transparency, Phys. Rev. A111, 043507 (2025)

work page 2025
[47]

Yu, Y.-F

H.-Y. Yu, Y.-F. Jiao, J. Wang, F. Li, B. Yin, Q.-R. Liu, T. Jiang, H. Jing, and K. Wei, Strong molecule-light en- tanglement with molecular cavity optomechanics, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 013602 (2026)

work page 2026
[48]

E. K. Berinyuy, D. R. K. Massembele, P. Djorwé, R. Al- tuijri, S. Abdel-Khalek, A. H. Abdel-Aty, and S. G. N. Engo, Quantum correlations in molecular cavity optome- chanics, Chaos, Solitons & Fractals205, 117820 (2026)

work page 2026
[49]

J. Tang, B. Li, B. Yin, T.-X. Lu, R. Huang, F. Nori, and H. Jing, Robust photon blockade with hybrid molecular optomechanics (2025), arXiv:2512.21035

work page arXiv 2025
[50]

E. K. Berinyuy, C. Tchodimou, P. Djorwé, S. K. Singh, and S. G. N. Engo, A blueprint for robust, high- temperature quantum entanglement with PT-symmetric molecular optomechanics (2025), arXiv:2509.16675

work page arXiv 2025
[51]

F. Benz, M. K. Schmidt, A. Dreismann, R. Chikkaraddy, Y. Zhang, A. Demetriadou, C. Carnegie, H. Ohadi, B. de Nijs, R. Esteban, J. Aizpurua, and J. J. Baumberg, Single-molecule optomechanics in ?picocavities?, Science 354, 726 (2016)

work page 2016
[52]

M. K. Schmidt, R. Esteban, A. González-Tudela, G. Giedke, and J. Aizpurua, Quantum Mechanical De- scription of Raman Scattering from Molecules in Plas- monic Cavities, ACS Nano10, 6291 (2016)

work page 2016
[53]

Lombardi, M

A. Lombardi, M. K. Schmidt, L. Weller, W. M. Deacon, F. Benz, B. de Nijs, J. Aizpurua, and J. J. Baumberg, Pulsed molecular optomechanics in plasmonic nanocav- ities: From nonlinear vibrational instabilities to bond- breaking, Phys. Rev. X8, 011016 (2018)

work page 2018
[54]

Zhang, J

Y. Zhang, J. Aizpurua, and R. Esteban, Optomechani- calcollectiveeffectsinsurface-enhancedramanscattering 10 from many molecules, ACS Photonics7, 1676 (2020)

work page 2020
[55]

Esteban, J

R. Esteban, J. J. Baumberg, and J. Aizpurua, Molecular Optomechanics Approach to Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering, Acc. Chem. Res.55, 1889 (2022)

work page 2022
[56]

Y. Xu, H. Hu, W. Chen, P. Suo, Y. Zhang, S. Zhang, and H. Xu, Phononic cavity optomechanics of atomically thin crystal in plasmonic nanocavity, ACS Nano16, 12711 (2022)

work page 2022
[57]

Shalabney, J

A. Shalabney, J. George, J. Hutchison, G. Pupillo, C. Genet, and T. W. Ebbesen, Coherent coupling of molecular resonators with a microcavity mode, Nat. Commun.6, 5981 (2015)

work page 2015
[58]

Pannir-Sivajothi, J

S. Pannir-Sivajothi, J. A. Campos-Gonzalez-Angulo, L. A. Martínez-Martínez, S. Sinha, and J. Yuen-Zhou, Driving chemical reactions with polariton condensates, Nat. Commun.13, 1645 (2022)

work page 2022
[59]

S. Weis, R. Rivière, S. Deléglise, E. Gavartin, O. Arcizet, A. Schliesser, and T. J. Kippenberg, Optomechanically Induced Transparency, Science330, 1520 (2010)

work page 2010
[60]

E. X. DeJesus and C. Kaufman, Routh-hurwitz criterion in the examination of eigenvalues of a system of nonlinear ordinary differential equations, Phys. Rev. A35, 5288 (1987)

work page 1987
[61]

I. S. Gradshteyn and I. M. Ryzhik,Table of integrals, series, and products(Academic press, 2014)

work page 2014
[62]

C. W. Gardiner and M. J. Collett, Input and output in damped quantum systems: Quantum stochastic differen- tial equations and the master equation, Phys. Rev. A31, 3761 (1985)

work page 1985
[63]

G. S. Agarwal and S. Huang, Optomechanical systems as single-photon routers, Phys. Rev. A85, 021801 (2012)

work page 2012
[64]

Xu and Y

X.-W. Xu and Y. Li, Controllable optical output fields from an optomechanical system with mechanical driving, Phys. Rev. A92, 023855 (2015)

work page 2015
[65]

(i) To eliminate the time- dependent terms in Hamiltonian (1), we transform the system into the interaction picture with respect toωpa†a

The correspondence between the first anti-stokes (stokes) sideband of the pump field andω=−ω b (ω=ω b) arises from two considerations. (i) To eliminate the time- dependent terms in Hamiltonian (1), we transform the system into the interaction picture with respect toωpa†a. (ii) The Fourier transform is defined as in Eq. (10), where the exponential factor t...

work page
[66]

Jiang, L

C. Jiang, L. N. Song, and Y. Li, Directional amplifier in an optomechanical system with optical gain, Phys. Rev. A97, 053812 (2018)

work page 2018

[1] [1]

De Bruyne, M

S. De Bruyne, M. M. Speeckaert, and J. R. Delanghe, Applications of mid-infrared spectroscopy in the clinical laboratory setting, Crit. Rev. Clin. Lab. Sci.55, 1 (2018)

work page 2018

[2] [2]

Tonouchi, Cutting-edge terahertz technology, Nat

M. Tonouchi, Cutting-edge terahertz technology, Nat. Photonics1, 97 (2007)

work page 2007

[3] [3]

Kutas, B

M. Kutas, B. Haase, P. Bickert, F. Riexinger, D. Molter, and G. von Freymann, Terahertz quantum sensing, Sci. Adv.6, eaaz8065 (2020)

work page 2020

[4] [4]

Kviatkovsky, H

I. Kviatkovsky, H. M. Chrzanowski, E. G. Avery, H. Bar- tolomaeus, and S. Ramelow, Microscopy with unde- tected photons in the mid-infrared, Sci. Adv.6, eabd0264 (2020)

work page 2020

[5] [5]

A. V. Paterova, S. M. Maniam, H. Yang, G. Grenci, and L. A. Krivitsky, Hyperspectral infrared microscopy with visible light, Sci. Adv.6, eabd0460 (2020)

work page 2020

[6] [6]

Ariyoshi, K

S. Ariyoshi, K. Nakajima, A. Saito, T. Taino, C. Otani, H. Yamada, S. Ohshima, J. Bae, and S. Tanaka, Tera- hertz response of NbN-based microwave kinetic induc- tance detectors with rewound spiral resonator, Super- cond. Sci. Technol.29, 035012 (2016)

work page 2016

[7] [7]

T. L. Roellig, C. W. McMurtry, T. P. Greene, T. Mat- suo, I. Sakon, and J. G. Staguhn, Mid-infrared detector development for the Origins Space Telescope, J. Astron. Telesc. Instrum. Syst.6, 041503 (2020)

work page 2020

[8] [8]

D. A. Kalashnikov, A. V. Paterova, S. P. Kulik, and L. A. Krivitsky, Infrared spectroscopy with visible light, Nat. Photonics10, 98 (2016)

work page 2016

[9] [9]

Lindner, J

C. Lindner, J. Kunz, S. J. Herr, S. Wolf, J. Kießling, and F. Kühnemann, Nonlinear interferometer for fourier- transform mid-infrared gas spectroscopy using near- infrared detection, Opt. Express29, 4035 (2021)

work page 2021

[10] [10]

A. Barh, P. J. Rodrigo, L. Meng, C. Pedersen, and P. Tidemand-Lichtenberg, Parametric upconversion imaging and its applications, Adv. Opt. Photonics11, 952 (2019)

work page 2019

[11] [11]

Roelli, D

P. Roelli, D. Martin-Cano, T. J. Kippenberg, and C. Gal- land, Molecular Platform for Frequency Upconversion at theSingle-PhotonLevel,Phys.Rev.X10,031057(2020)

work page 2020

[12] [12]

W. Chen, P. Roelli, H. Hu, S. Verlekar, S. P. Amirtharaj, A. I. Barreda, T. J. Kippenberg, M. Kovylina, E. Verha- gen, A. Martínez, and C. Galland, Continuous-wave fre- quency upconversion with a molecular optomechanical nanocavity, Science374, 1264 (2021)

work page 2021

[13] [13]

Miele, E

A.Xomalis, X.Zheng, R.Chikkaraddy, Z.Koczor-Benda, E. Miele, E. Rosta, G. A. E. Vandenbosch, A. Martínez, and J. J. Baumberg, Detecting mid-infrared light by molecular frequency upconversion in dual-wavelength nanoantennas, Science374, 1268 (2021)

work page 2021

[14] [14]

F. Zou, L. Du, Y. Li, and H. Dong, Amplifying frequency up-converted infrared signals with a molecular optome- chanical cavity, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 153602 (2024)

work page 2024

[15] [15]

Temporão, S

G. Temporão, S. Tanzilli, H. Zbinden, N. Gisin, T. Aellen, M. Giovannini, and J. Faist, Mid-infrared single-photon counting, Opt. Lett.31, 1094 (2006)

work page 2006

[16] [16]

Tseng, C

Y.-P. Tseng, C. Pedersen, and P. Tidemand-Lichtenberg, Upconversion detection of long-wave infrared radiation from a quantum cascade laser, Opt. Mater. Express8, 1313 (2018)

work page 2018

[17] [17]

Tian and H

L. Tian and H. Wang, Optical wavelength conversion of quantum states with optomechanics, Phys. Rev. A82, 053806 (2010)

work page 2010

[18] [18]

C. Dong, V. Fiore, M. C. Kuzyk, and H. Wang, Optome- chanical Dark Mode, Science338, 1609 (2012)

work page 2012

[19] [19]

J. T. Hill, A. H. Safavi-Naeini, J. Chan, and O. Painter, Coherent optical wavelength conversion via cavity op- tomechanics, Nat. Commun.3, 1196 (2012)

work page 2012

[20] [20]

T. A. Palomaki, J. W. Harlow, J. D. Teufel, R. W. Sim- monds, and K. W. Lehnert, Coherent state transfer be- tween itinerant microwave fields and a mechanical oscil- lator, Nature (London)495, 210 (2013)

work page 2013

[21] [21]

Wang and A

Y.-D. Wang and A. A. Clerk, Using interference for high fidelity quantum state transfer in optomechanics, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 153603 (2012)

work page 2012

[22] [22]

Tian, Adiabatic state conversion and pulse transmis- sion in optomechanical systems, Phys

L. Tian, Adiabatic state conversion and pulse transmis- sion in optomechanical systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 153604 (2012). 9

work page 2012

[23] [23]

Bochmann, A

J. Bochmann, A. Vainsencher, D. D. Awschalom, and A. N. Cleland, Nanomechanical coupling between mi- crowave and optical photons, Nat. Phys.9, 712 (2013)

work page 2013

[24] [24]

R. W. Andrews, R. W. Peterson, T. P. Purdy, K. Cicak, R. W. Simmonds, C. A. Regal, and K. W. Lehnert, Bidi- rectional and efficient conversion between microwave and optical light, Nat. Phys.10, 321 (2014)

work page 2014

[25] [25]

Nunnenkamp, V

A. Nunnenkamp, V. Sudhir, A. K. Feofanov, A. Roulet, and T. J. Kippenberg, Quantum-limited amplification and parametric instability in the reversed dissipation regime of cavity optomechanics, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 023604 (2014)

work page 2014

[26] [26]

Metelmann and A

A. Metelmann and A. A. Clerk, Quantum-limited ampli- fication via reservoir engineering, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 133904 (2014)

work page 2014

[27] [27]

Metelmann and A

A. Metelmann and A. A. Clerk, Nonreciprocal photon transmission and amplification via reservoir engineering, Phys. Rev. X5, 021025 (2015)

work page 2015

[28] [28]

Ruesink, J

F. Ruesink, J. P. Mathew, M.-A. Miri, A. Alù, and E. Verhagen, Optical circulation in a multimode optome- chanical resonator, Nat. Commun.9, 1798 (2018)

work page 2018

[29] [29]

Shen, Y.-L

Z. Shen, Y.-L. Zhang, Y. Chen, F.-W. Sun, X.-B. Zou, G.-C. Guo, C.-L. Zou, and C.-H. Dong, Reconfigurable optomechanical circulator and directional amplifier, Nat. Commun.9, 1797 (2018)

work page 2018

[30] [30]

Forsch, R

M. Forsch, R. Stockill, A. Wallucks, I. Marinković, C. Gärtner, R. A. Norte, F. van Otten, A. Fiore, K. Srini- vasan, and S. Gröblacher, Microwave-to-optics conver- sion using a mechanical oscillator in its quantum ground state, Nat. Phys.16, 69 (2020)

work page 2020

[31] [31]

A. A. Clerk, M. H. Devoret, S. M. Girvin, F. Marquardt, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Introduction to quantum noise, measurement, and amplification, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 1155 (2010)

work page 2010

[32] [32]

D. Malz, L. D. Tóth, N. R. Bernier, A. K. Feofanov, T. J. Kippenberg, and A. Nunnenkamp, Quantum-limited di- rectional amplifiers with optomechanics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 023601 (2018)

work page 2018

[33] [33]

Roelli, C

P. Roelli, C. Galland, N. Piro, and T. J. Kippenberg, Molecular cavity optomechanics as a theory of plasmon- enhanced Raman scattering, Nat. Nanotechnol.11, 164 (2016)

work page 2016

[34] [34]

L. A. Jakob, W. M. Deacon, Y. Zhang, B. de Nijs, E. Pavlenko, S. Hu, C. Carnegie, T. Neuman, R. Es- teban, J. Aizpurua, and J. J. Baumberg, Giant optome- chanical spring effect in plasmonic nano- and picocavities probed by surface-enhanced raman scattering, Nat. Com- mun.14, 3291 (2023)

work page 2023

[35] [35]

Boehmke Amoruso, R

A. Boehmke Amoruso, R. A. Boto, E. Elliot, B. de Nijs, R. Esteban, T. Földes, F. Aguilar-Galindo, E. Rosta, J. Aizpurua, and J. J. Baumberg, Uncovering low- frequency vibrations in surface-enhanced raman of or- ganic molecules, Nat. Commun.15, 6733 (2024)

work page 2024

[36] [36]

Huang, D

J. Huang, D. Lei, G. S. Agarwal, and Z. Zhang, Collective quantum entanglement in molecular cavity optomechan- ics, Phys. Rev. B110, 184306 (2024)

work page 2024

[37] [37]

Roelli, H

P. Roelli, H. Hu, E. Verhagen, S. Reich, and C. Galland, Nanocavities for molecular optomechanics: Their funda- mental description and applications, ACS Photonics11, 4486 (2024)

work page 2024

[38] [38]

M. K. Schmidt and M. J. Steel, Molecular optomechan- ics in the anharmonic regime: from nonclassical mechan- ical states to mechanical lasing, New J. Phys.26, 033041 (2024)

work page 2024

[39] [39]

Abutalebi, S

S. Abutalebi, S. M. Ashrafi, H. R. Askari, and A. Bahrampour, Single-photon generation at room tem- perature using molecular optomechanics in a hybrid photonic-plasmonic cavity, Opt. Mater. Express14, 2134 (2024)

work page 2024

[40] [40]

F. M. Kalarde, F. Ciccarello, C. S. Muñoz, J. Feist, and C. Galland, Photon antibunching in single-molecule vi- brational sum-frequency generation, Nanophotonics14, 59 (2025)

work page 2025

[41] [41]

E. K. Berinyuy, J.-X. Peng, A. Sohail, P. Djorwe, A.-H. Abdel-Aty, N. Alessa, K. S. Nisar, and S. G. N. Engo, Nonreciprocal entanglement in a molecular optomechan- ical system, Physica B: Condensed Matter713, 417313 (2025)

work page 2025

[42] [42]

E. K. Berinyuy, C. Tchodimou, P. Djorwé, A.-H. Abdel- Aty, K. S. Nisar, and S. G. N. Engo, Enhancing mechani- cal entanglement in molecular optomechanics, Eur. Phys. J. Plus140, 806 (2025)

work page 2025

[43] [43]

J.-X. Peng, C. Zhao, P. Djorwe, K. B. Emale, Z.-W. Yu, and M. Asjad, Macroscopic quantum coherence and quantum complete synchronization in molecular optome- chanical system, Chaos, Solitons & Fractals197, 116473 (2025)

work page 2025

[44] [44]

Huang, D

J. Huang, D. Lei, and Z. Zhang, Generating coherent ra- man scattering using a molecular optomechanical cavity, Nano Lett.25, 16372 (2025)

work page 2025

[45] [45]

Munir, M

A. Munir, M. Jibran, and C. Wang, Photonic spin hall effect induced by collective strong coupling of molecular ensembles in a plasmonic nanocavity, Phys. Rev. A112, 023517 (2025)

work page 2025

[46] [46]

B. Yin, J. Wang, M.-Y. Peng, Q. Zhang, D. Wang, T.- X. Lu, K. Wei, and H. Jing, Molecular optomechanically induced transparency, Phys. Rev. A111, 043507 (2025)

work page 2025

[47] [47]

Yu, Y.-F

H.-Y. Yu, Y.-F. Jiao, J. Wang, F. Li, B. Yin, Q.-R. Liu, T. Jiang, H. Jing, and K. Wei, Strong molecule-light en- tanglement with molecular cavity optomechanics, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 013602 (2026)

work page 2026

[48] [48]

E. K. Berinyuy, D. R. K. Massembele, P. Djorwé, R. Al- tuijri, S. Abdel-Khalek, A. H. Abdel-Aty, and S. G. N. Engo, Quantum correlations in molecular cavity optome- chanics, Chaos, Solitons & Fractals205, 117820 (2026)

work page 2026

[49] [49]

J. Tang, B. Li, B. Yin, T.-X. Lu, R. Huang, F. Nori, and H. Jing, Robust photon blockade with hybrid molecular optomechanics (2025), arXiv:2512.21035

work page arXiv 2025

[50] [50]

E. K. Berinyuy, C. Tchodimou, P. Djorwé, S. K. Singh, and S. G. N. Engo, A blueprint for robust, high- temperature quantum entanglement with PT-symmetric molecular optomechanics (2025), arXiv:2509.16675

work page arXiv 2025

[51] [51]

F. Benz, M. K. Schmidt, A. Dreismann, R. Chikkaraddy, Y. Zhang, A. Demetriadou, C. Carnegie, H. Ohadi, B. de Nijs, R. Esteban, J. Aizpurua, and J. J. Baumberg, Single-molecule optomechanics in ?picocavities?, Science 354, 726 (2016)

work page 2016

[52] [52]

M. K. Schmidt, R. Esteban, A. González-Tudela, G. Giedke, and J. Aizpurua, Quantum Mechanical De- scription of Raman Scattering from Molecules in Plas- monic Cavities, ACS Nano10, 6291 (2016)

work page 2016

[53] [53]

Lombardi, M

A. Lombardi, M. K. Schmidt, L. Weller, W. M. Deacon, F. Benz, B. de Nijs, J. Aizpurua, and J. J. Baumberg, Pulsed molecular optomechanics in plasmonic nanocav- ities: From nonlinear vibrational instabilities to bond- breaking, Phys. Rev. X8, 011016 (2018)

work page 2018

[54] [54]

Zhang, J

Y. Zhang, J. Aizpurua, and R. Esteban, Optomechani- calcollectiveeffectsinsurface-enhancedramanscattering 10 from many molecules, ACS Photonics7, 1676 (2020)

work page 2020

[55] [55]

Esteban, J

R. Esteban, J. J. Baumberg, and J. Aizpurua, Molecular Optomechanics Approach to Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering, Acc. Chem. Res.55, 1889 (2022)

work page 2022

[56] [56]

Y. Xu, H. Hu, W. Chen, P. Suo, Y. Zhang, S. Zhang, and H. Xu, Phononic cavity optomechanics of atomically thin crystal in plasmonic nanocavity, ACS Nano16, 12711 (2022)

work page 2022

[57] [57]

Shalabney, J

A. Shalabney, J. George, J. Hutchison, G. Pupillo, C. Genet, and T. W. Ebbesen, Coherent coupling of molecular resonators with a microcavity mode, Nat. Commun.6, 5981 (2015)

work page 2015

[58] [58]

Pannir-Sivajothi, J

S. Pannir-Sivajothi, J. A. Campos-Gonzalez-Angulo, L. A. Martínez-Martínez, S. Sinha, and J. Yuen-Zhou, Driving chemical reactions with polariton condensates, Nat. Commun.13, 1645 (2022)

work page 2022

[59] [59]

S. Weis, R. Rivière, S. Deléglise, E. Gavartin, O. Arcizet, A. Schliesser, and T. J. Kippenberg, Optomechanically Induced Transparency, Science330, 1520 (2010)

work page 2010

[60] [60]

E. X. DeJesus and C. Kaufman, Routh-hurwitz criterion in the examination of eigenvalues of a system of nonlinear ordinary differential equations, Phys. Rev. A35, 5288 (1987)

work page 1987

[61] [61]

I. S. Gradshteyn and I. M. Ryzhik,Table of integrals, series, and products(Academic press, 2014)

work page 2014

[62] [62]

C. W. Gardiner and M. J. Collett, Input and output in damped quantum systems: Quantum stochastic differen- tial equations and the master equation, Phys. Rev. A31, 3761 (1985)

work page 1985

[63] [63]

G. S. Agarwal and S. Huang, Optomechanical systems as single-photon routers, Phys. Rev. A85, 021801 (2012)

work page 2012

[64] [64]

Xu and Y

X.-W. Xu and Y. Li, Controllable optical output fields from an optomechanical system with mechanical driving, Phys. Rev. A92, 023855 (2015)

work page 2015

[65] [65]

(i) To eliminate the time- dependent terms in Hamiltonian (1), we transform the system into the interaction picture with respect toωpa†a

The correspondence between the first anti-stokes (stokes) sideband of the pump field andω=−ω b (ω=ω b) arises from two considerations. (i) To eliminate the time- dependent terms in Hamiltonian (1), we transform the system into the interaction picture with respect toωpa†a. (ii) The Fourier transform is defined as in Eq. (10), where the exponential factor t...

work page

[66] [66]

Jiang, L

C. Jiang, L. N. Song, and Y. Li, Directional amplifier in an optomechanical system with optical gain, Phys. Rev. A97, 053812 (2018)

work page 2018