pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.19608 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-21 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall

Supermoir\'{e} domain-resolved effective Hamiltonians and valley topology in helical multilayer graphene

Kyungjin Shin , Nicolas Leconte , Jeil Jung , Hongki Min This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 01:43 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords helical multilayer graphenesupermoiré relaxationeffective Hamiltoniansfolded Dirac sectorsvalley Chern numbersdomain-dependent topologygate-tunable response
0
0 comments X

The pith

Relaxation in helical multilayer graphene forms single-moiré domains whose effective Dirac Hamiltonians encode domain-dependent valley topology.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a theoretical framework showing that atomic relaxation in helical multilayer graphene reconstructs the stack into locally periodic single-moiré domains. These domains serve as the foundation for a continuum model obtained by downfolding the first-shell tight-binding description near the Dirac points. The resulting effective Hamiltonians decompose the low-energy spectrum into folded Dirac sectors whose valley Chern numbers depend on the local stacking and can be tuned by gate voltage. The domain-resolved topological responses match those obtained from full real-space lattice calculations, providing an organizing principle for the electronic structure of thicker helical stacks.

Core claim

In helical multilayer graphene, relaxation reconstructs the system into locally periodic single-moiré domains. Within each domain, downfolding the first-shell model produces effective Hamiltonians near the Dirac points that decompose the low-energy spectrum into folded Dirac sectors. These Hamiltonians carry valley Chern numbers that are domain-dependent and gate-tunable, and the resulting topological responses agree with direct lattice calculations.

What carries the argument

Domain-resolved effective Hamiltonians obtained by downfolding the first-shell model near the Dirac points, which capture the decomposition into folded Dirac sectors and the associated valley Chern numbers.

If this is right

  • The low-energy spectrum partitions into folded Dirac sectors inside each reconstructed domain.
  • Valley topology and band character are set by the local stacking family and become gate-tunable.
  • A continuum description based on single-moiré domains is valid for the supermoiré system.
  • Topological responses remain consistent between the effective Hamiltonians and full lattice calculations.
  • The framework organizes the electronic structure of thicker helical multilayer stacks.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The domain picture may generalize to other twisted multilayer systems that exhibit supermoiré reconstruction.
  • Gate control of valley Chern numbers in separate domains could enable spatially selective topological transport or edge-state engineering.
  • Domain boundaries between regions of different stacking might introduce additional interface states not captured inside the bulk domains.

Load-bearing premise

Real-space lattice calculations of relaxation accurately capture the supermoiré reconstruction and downfolding the first-shell model preserves the essential low-energy physics without significant higher-order or inter-shell contributions.

What would settle it

A direct mismatch between the valley Chern numbers or band dispersions predicted by the domain effective Hamiltonians and those computed from the full lattice model at the same gate voltage and domain type would falsify the claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.19608 by Hongki Min, Jeil Jung, Kyungjin Shin, Nicolas Leconte.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: (b). The domain contribution Cαβ represents the stacking￾dependent topological background intrinsic to the local αβ single-moir´e domain and underlies the Chern mosaic across the supermoir´e structure [54, 55, 60]. Together with the local Dirac-node contributions, it ensures an in￾teger valley Chern number for the isolated moir´e bands. This topological picture is supported by real-space lat￾tice calculati… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (a), leading to a constructive |C| = 2 sequence via FIG. 5. Bias-driven evolution of the band topology in h4G. Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Extending moir\'{e} graphene beyond twisted bilayers, helical trilayer graphene has shown topological bands and correlated states with reshaped moir\'{e} periodicity. Here we develop a theoretical framework for helical multilayer graphene to investigate its supermoir\'{e} relaxation and low-energy electronic structure. Using real-space lattice calculations, we find that relaxation reconstructs the system into locally periodic single-moir\'{e} domains, which provide the basis for a continuum description. Within each reconstructed domain, downfolding the first-shell model yields effective Hamiltonians near the Dirac points that reveal how the low-energy spectrum decomposes into folded Dirac sectors. We further evaluate the valley Chern numbers encoded in these effective Hamiltonians, obtaining domain-dependent and gate-tunable topological responses consistent with the lattice calculations. Our results establish a domain-resolved organizing principle for thicker helical graphene stacks, in which folded Dirac sectors partition the low-energy spectrum, while local stacking families determine the corresponding band character and topological response.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper develops a theoretical framework for helical multilayer graphene focusing on supermoiré relaxation and low-energy electronic structure. Real-space lattice calculations show that atomic relaxation reconstructs the system into locally periodic single-moiré domains. Within each domain, downfolding the first-shell interlayer model produces effective Hamiltonians near the Dirac points that decompose the spectrum into folded Dirac sectors. Valley Chern numbers extracted from these Hamiltonians are domain-dependent and gate-tunable, and the results are stated to be consistent with the underlying lattice calculations. The work proposes this domain-resolved picture as an organizing principle for thicker helical stacks.

Significance. If the downfolding faithfully captures the low-energy topology, the framework supplies a concrete link between local stacking families, folded Dirac sectors, and tunable valley Chern numbers in multilayer helical graphene. This could help interpret correlated states observed in such systems and guide continuum modeling of supermoiré reconstructions beyond twisted bilayers.

major comments (2)
  1. [Results on effective Hamiltonians and valley topology] The central consistency claim between the downfolded effective Hamiltonians and the full lattice calculations is load-bearing for the reported domain-dependent valley Chern numbers and gate tunability. The manuscript states agreement but does not provide a quantitative side-by-side comparison (e.g., numerical values of Chern numbers or gap sizes) inside an explicitly identified domain, nor does it report the magnitude of discrepancies.
  2. [Downfolding procedure and effective Hamiltonian derivation] The downfolding is restricted to first-shell interlayer terms. Given that interlayer coupling in graphene is long-ranged, the truncation risks omitting contributions that can shift Dirac-point gaps and Berry curvature at the scale of the reported topological responses. No convergence test with second- or higher-shell terms, nor an estimate of the resulting error in the valley Chern numbers, is presented.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Methods] Notation for the folded Dirac sectors and the precise definition of the first-shell cutoff should be clarified with an explicit equation or diagram to aid reproducibility.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions for the lattice relaxation and band-structure plots should explicitly label the domains used for the Chern-number extraction.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive report. We address each major comment below, indicating where revisions will be made to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central consistency claim between the downfolded effective Hamiltonians and the full lattice calculations is load-bearing for the reported domain-dependent valley Chern numbers and gate tunability. The manuscript states agreement but does not provide a quantitative side-by-side comparison (e.g., numerical values of Chern numbers or gap sizes) inside an explicitly identified domain, nor does it report the magnitude of discrepancies.

    Authors: We agree that providing a quantitative comparison would enhance the clarity and rigor of our consistency claim. In the revised manuscript, we will include a dedicated subsection or figure that identifies specific supermoiré domains, tabulates the valley Chern numbers obtained from the effective Hamiltonians, and compares them directly to those extracted from the real-space lattice calculations. We will also report the corresponding gap sizes and quantify any small discrepancies observed, thereby making the agreement explicit and measurable. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The downfolding is restricted to first-shell interlayer terms. Given that interlayer coupling in graphene is long-ranged, the truncation risks omitting contributions that can shift Dirac-point gaps and Berry curvature at the scale of the reported topological responses. No convergence test with second- or higher-shell terms, nor an estimate of the resulting error in the valley Chern numbers, is presented.

    Authors: While the first-shell approximation is widely used and justified by the dominant nearest-neighbor interlayer couplings in the literature on moiré systems, we acknowledge the value of assessing the impact of longer-range terms. In the revision, we will extend the downfolding procedure to include second-shell interlayer terms for representative domains and compute the resulting changes to the effective Hamiltonian parameters, Dirac-point gaps, and valley Chern numbers. This will allow us to provide an estimate of the truncation error and confirm the robustness of the reported topological responses. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper begins with independent real-space lattice calculations to determine supermoiré relaxation into locally periodic single-moiré domains. It then applies standard downfolding of the first-shell interlayer model to construct effective Hamiltonians near the Dirac points, from which folded Dirac sectors and valley Chern numbers are extracted. These are checked for consistency against the original lattice results, but the consistency check is a validation step rather than a reduction of the output to the input by construction. No load-bearing self-citations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or self-definitional steps are present; the derivation chain remains self-contained with external computational benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Ledger inferred from abstract only: relies on standard domain assumptions in moiré graphene modeling.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption First-shell model for interlayer coupling is sufficient for low-energy downfolding
    Invoked when constructing effective Hamiltonians from lattice calculations.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5481 in / 1260 out tokens · 43081 ms · 2026-05-10T01:43:21.426850+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

95 extracted references · 95 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    (b) Low-energy spectra at theK 1,2,3 sectors forN= 3–7 in the presence of the MDT

    for multiplicitiesN ℓ = 1,2, and 3. (b) Low-energy spectra at theK 1,2,3 sectors forN= 3–7 in the presence of the MDT. Each sector is built from the correspondingNℓ building blocks shown in (a), which are subsequently gapped or otherwise reshaped by the MDT. to produce an effective 2N ℓ ×2N ℓ Hamiltonian with the structure of Bernal-stacked graphene, wher...

    work page 2023

  2. [2]

    Tight-binding model and band structures To complement the continuum band structures pre- sented in the main text, we show in Fig. A1 represen- tative lattice band structures for theααα,αβα, and αβγstacking families in 3-, 4-, and 5-layer systems, computed within the scaled hybrid exponential (SHE) tight-binding (TB) model [68]. In this model, the in- tral...

    work page

  3. [3]

    In this approach, the real-space TB Hamiltonian is projected onto a momentum-space basis composed of atomic plane waves centered around a chosen valley,KorK ′

    TAPW method and valley Chern numbers To compute valley-resolved Chern numbers, we first construct valley-resolved electronic bands using the trun- cated atomic plane-wave (TAPW) method [88]. In this approach, the real-space TB Hamiltonian is projected onto a momentum-space basis composed of atomic plane waves centered around a chosen valley,KorK ′. The ba...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Stacking-map construction and classification To characterize the complex spatial textures of the re- laxed multilayer structures, we construct stacking maps by assigning each atomic position to a discrete high- symmetry stacking class based on its local interlayer reg- istry, as defined in Ref. [90]. For a given pair of adjacent layers (ℓ, ℓ+ 1), we separ...

    work page

  5. [5]

    The resulting dispersions in each sector are those of a massive Dirac model with a Dirac mass term±(γ A − γB)σz/2

    This yields the renormalized forms ˜hs/a = ±γA v(1) ∓i ηv 4 Π† k v(1) ±i ηv 4 Πk ±γB ! ,(B11) where η= 1 2 + 3 2 ∆B γB − ∆A γA .(B12) At this order, the diagonal terms remain unrenormalized. The resulting dispersions in each sector are those of a massive Dirac model with a Dirac mass term±(γ A − γB)σz/2. The lowest-energy conduction and valence bands of t...

    work page

  6. [6]

    Y. Cao, V. Fatemi, S. Fang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E. Kaxiras, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Unconventional Su- perconductivity in Magic-Angle Graphene Superlattices, Nature (London)556, 43 (2018)

    work page 2018

  7. [7]

    Y. Cao, V. Fatemi, A. Demir, S. Fang, S. L. Tomarken, J. Y. Luo, J. D. Sanchez-Yamagishi, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E. Kaxiras, R. C. Ashoori, and P. Jarillo- Herrero, Correlated Insulator Behaviour at Half-Filling in Magic-Angle Graphene Superlattices, Nature (Lon- don)556, 80 (2018)

    work page 2018

  8. [8]

    G. Li, A. Luican, J. M. B. Lopes dos Santos, A. H. Castro Neto, A. Reina, J. Kong, and E. Y. Andrei, Observation of Van Hove singularities in twisted graphene layers, Nat. Phys.6, 109 (2010)

    work page 2010

  9. [9]

    Trambly de Laissardi` ere, D

    G. Trambly de Laissardi` ere, D. Mayou, and L. Magaud, Localization of Dirac Electrons in Rotated Graphene Bi- layers, Nano Lett.10, 804 (2010)

    work page 2010

  10. [10]

    Su´ arez Morell, J

    E. Su´ arez Morell, J. D. Correa, P. Vargas, M. Pacheco, and Z. Barticevic, Flat bands in slightly twisted bilayer graphene: Tight-binding calculations, Phys. Rev. B82, 121407(R) (2010)

    work page 2010

  11. [11]

    Bistritzer and A

    R. Bistritzer and A. H. MacDonald, Moir´ e bands in twisted double-layer graphene, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.108, 12233 (2011)

    work page 2011

  12. [12]

    Tarnopolsky, A

    G. Tarnopolsky, A. J. Kruchkov, and A. Vishwanath, Origin of Magic Angles in Twisted Bilayer Graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 106405 (2019)

    work page 2019

  13. [13]

    M. I. B. Utama, R. J. Koch, K. Lee, N. Leconte, H. Li, S. Zhao, L. Jiang, J. Zhu, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, P. D. Ashby, A. Weber-Bargioni, A. Zettl, C. Jozwiak, J. Jung, E. Rotenberg, A. Bostwick, and F. Wang, Visualization of the flat electronic band in twisted bilayer graphene near the magic angle twist, Nat. Phys.17, 184 (2021)

    work page 2021

  14. [14]

    S. Lisi, X. Lu, T. Benschopet al., Observation of flat bands in twisted bilayer graphene, Nat. Phys.17, 189 (2021)

    work page 2021

  15. [15]

    S. Carr, D. Massatt, S. Fang, P. Cazeaux, M. Luskin, and E. Kaxiras, Twistronics: Manipulating the electronic properties of two-dimensional layered structures through their twist angle, Phys. Rev. B95, 075420 (2017)

    work page 2017

  16. [16]

    Balents, C

    L. Balents, C. R. Dean, D. K. Efetov, and A. F. Young, Superconductivity and strong correlations in moir´ e flat bands, Nat. Phys.16, 725 (2020)

    work page 2020

  17. [17]

    E. Y. Andrei, D. K. Efetov, P. Jarillo-Herrero, A. H. MacDonald, K. F. Mak, T. Senthil, E. Tutuc, A. Yazdani, and A. F. Young, The marvels of moir´ e materials, Nat. Rev. Mater.6, 201 (2021)

    work page 2021

  18. [18]

    Hennighausen and S

    Z. Hennighausen and S. Kar, Twistronics: a turning point in 2D quantum materials, Electron. Struct.3, 014004 (2021)

    work page 2021

  19. [19]

    Khalaf, A

    E. Khalaf, A. J. Kruchkov, G. Tarnopolsky, and A. Vish- wanath, Magic angle hierarchy in twisted graphene mul- tilayers, Phys. Rev. B100, 085109 (2019)

    work page 2019

  20. [20]

    J. M. Park, Y. Cao, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Tunable strongly coupled superconduc- tivity in magic-angle twisted trilayer graphene, Nature (London)590, 249 (2021)

    work page 2021

  21. [21]

    Z. Hao, A. M. Zimmerman, P. Ledwith, E. Khalaf, D. Haie Najafabadi, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, A. Vish- wanath, and P. Kim, Electric field–tunable superconduc- tivity in alternating-twist magic-angle trilayer graphene, Science371, 1133 (2021)

    work page 2021

  22. [22]

    J. M. Park, Y. Cao, L.-Q. Xia, S. Sun, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Robust supercon- ductivity in magic-angle multilayer graphene family, Nat. Mater.21, 877 (2022)

    work page 2022

  23. [23]

    Zhang, R

    Y. Zhang, R. Polski, C. Lewandowski, A. Thomson, Y. Peng, Y. Choi, H. Kim, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. Alicea, F. von Oppen, G. Refael, and S. Nadj-Perge, Promotion of superconductivity in magic-angle graphene multilayers, Science377, 1538 (2022)

    work page 2022

  24. [24]

    V. H. Nguyen, T. X. Hoang, and J.-C. Charlier, Elec- tronic properties of twisted multilayer graphene, J. Phys. Mater.5, 034003 (2022)

    work page 2022

  25. [25]

    J. Shin, B. L. Chittari, and J. Jung, Stacking and gate- tunable topological flat bands, gaps, and anisotropic strip patterns in twisted trilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. B104, 045413 (2021)

    work page 2021

  26. [26]

    Leconte, Y

    N. Leconte, Y. Park, J. An, A. Samudrala, and J. Jung, Electronic structure of lattice relaxed alternating twist tNG-multilayer graphene: from few layers to bulk AT- graphite, 2D Mater.9, 044002 (2022)

    work page 2022

  27. [27]

    K. Shin, Y. Jang, J. Shin, J. Jung, and H. Min, Electronic structure of biased alternating-twist multilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. B107, 245139 (2023)

    work page 2023

  28. [28]

    Leconte, Y

    N. Leconte, Y. Park, J. An, and J. Jung, Commensura- tion torques and lubricity in double moir´ e systems, Phys. Rev. B110, 024109 (2024)

    work page 2024

  29. [29]

    K. Shin, J. Shin, Y. Lee, H. Min, and J. Jung, Sliding-dependent electronic structures of alternating- twist tetralayer graphene, Phys. Rev. B110, 115136 (2024)

    work page 2024

  30. [30]

    G. Chen, L. Jiang, S. Wu, B. Lyu, H. Li, B. L. Chittari, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, Z. Shi, J. Jung, Y. Zhang, and F. Wang, Evidence of a gate-tunable Mott insulator in a trilayer graphene moir´ e superlattice, Nat. Phys.15, 237 (2019)

    work page 2019

  31. [31]

    G. Chen, A. L. Sharpe, E. J. Fox, Y.-H. Zhang, S. Wang, L. Jiang, B. Lyu, H. Li, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, Z. Shi, T. Senthil, D. Goldhaber-Gordon, Y. Zhang, and F. Wang, Tunable correlated Chern insulator and ferromag- netism in a moir´ e superlattice, Nature (London)579, 56 (2020)

    work page 2020

  32. [32]

    G. Chen, A. L. Sharpe, E. J. Fox, S. Wang, B. Lyu, L. Jiang, H. Li, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, M. F. Crom- mie, M. A. Kastner, Z. Shi, D. Goldhaber-Gordon, Y. Zhang, and F. Wang, Tunable Orbital Ferromagnetism at Noninteger Filling of a Moir´ e Superlattice, Nano Lett. 22, 159 (2022)

    work page 2022

  33. [33]

    B. L. Chittari, G. Chen, Y. Zhang, F. Wang, and J. Jung, Gate-Tunable Topological Flat Bands in Trilayer Graphene Boron-Nitride Moir´ e Superlattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 016401 (2019)

    work page 2019

  34. [34]

    D. A. Galeano Gonz´ alez, B. L. Chittari, Y. Park, J.-H. Sun, and J. Jung, Topological phases inN-layer ABC graphene/boron nitride moir´ e superlattices, Phys. Rev. B103, 165112 (2021)

    work page 2021

  35. [35]

    Y. Park, Y. Kim, B. L. Chittari, and J. Jung, Topologi- cal flat bands in rhombohedral tetralayer and multilayer graphene on hexagonal boron nitride moir´ e superlattices, Phys. Rev. B108, 155406 (2023)

    work page 2023

  36. [36]

    X. Han, Q. Liu, Y. Wang, R. Niu, Z. Qu, Z. Wang, Z. Li, 16 C. Han, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, Z. Song, J. Liu, J. Mao, Z. Han, B. L. Chittari, J. Jung, Z. Gan, and J. Lu, Engineering the Band Topology in a Rhombohedral Tri- layer Graphene Moir´ e Superlattice, Nano Lett.24, 6286 (2024)

    work page 2024

  37. [37]

    Z. Lu, T. Han, Y. Yao, A. P. Reddy, J. Yang, J. Seo, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, L. Fu, and L. Ju, Fractional quantum anomalous Hall effect in multilayer graphene, Nature (London)626, 759 (2024)

    work page 2024

  38. [38]

    Z. Dong, A. S. Patri, and T. Senthil, Theory of Quan- tum Anomalous Hall Phases in Pentalayer Rhombohe- dral Graphene Moir´ e Structures, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 206502 (2024)

    work page 2024

  39. [39]

    Zheng, S

    J. Zheng, S. Wu, K. Liu, B. Lyu, S. Liu, Y. Sha, Z. Li, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. Jia, Z. Shi, and G. Chen, Switchable Chern Insulators and Competing Quantum Phases in Rhombohedral Graphene Moir´ e Superlattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 136302 (2025)

    work page 2025

  40. [40]

    Q. Liu, Z. Wang, X. Han, Z. Li, B. Li, S. Zhou, L. Hu, Z. Qu, C. Han, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, Z. V. Han, B. Tong, G. Liu, L. Lu, F. Wu, and J. Lu, Odd-Chern- Number Quantum Anomalous Hall Effect at Even Fill- ing in Moir´ e Rhombohedral Heptalayer Graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 016602 (2026)

    work page 2026

  41. [41]

    M. H. Naik and M. Jain, Ultraflatbands and Shear Soli- tons in Moir´ e Patterns of Twisted Bilayer Transition Metal Dichalcogenides, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 266401 (2018)

    work page 2018

  42. [42]

    Vitale, K

    V. Vitale, K. Atalar, A. A. Mostofi, and J. Lischner, Flat band properties of twisted transition metal dichalco- genide homo- and heterobilayers of MoS 2, MoSe 2, WS 2 and WSe2, 2D Mater.8, 045010 (2021)

    work page 2021

  43. [43]

    Devakul, V

    T. Devakul, V. Cr´ epel, Y. Zhang, and L. Fu, Magic in twisted transition metal dichalcogenide bilayers, Nat. Commun.12, 6730 (2021)

    work page 2021

  44. [44]

    J. Cai, E. Anderson, C. Wang, X. Zhang, X. Liu, W. Holtzmann, Y. Zhang, F. Fan, T. Taniguchi, K. Watan- abe, Y. Ran, T. Cao, L. Fu, D. Xiao, W. Yao, and X. Xu, Signatures of fractional quantum anomalous Hall states in twisted MoTe2, Nature (London)622, 63 (2023)

    work page 2023

  45. [45]

    Y. Zeng, Z. Xia, K. Kang, J. Zhu, P. Kn¨ uppel, C. Vaswani, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, K. F. Mak, and J. Shan, Thermodynamic evidence of fractional Chern insu- lator in moir´ e MoTe2, Nature (London)622, 69 (2023)

    work page 2023

  46. [46]

    H. Park, J. Cai, E. Andersonet al., Observation of frac- tionally quantized anomalous Hall effect, Nature (Lon- don)622, 74 (2023)

    work page 2023

  47. [47]

    Cr´ epel and L

    V. Cr´ epel and L. Fu, Anomalous Hall metal and fractional Chern insulator in twisted transition metal dichalcogenides, Phys. Rev. B107, L201109 (2023)

    work page 2023

  48. [48]

    A. P. Reddy, F. Alsallom, Y. Zhang, T. Devakul, and L. Fu, Fractional quantum anomalous Hall states in twisted bilayer MoTe 2 and WSe 2, Phys. Rev. B108, 085117 (2023)

    work page 2023

  49. [49]

    C. Xu, J. Li, Y. Xu, and Y. Zhang, Maximally local- ized Wannier functions, interaction models, and frac- tional quantum anomalous Hall effect in twisted bilayer MoTe2, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.121, e2316749121 (2024)

    work page 2024

  50. [50]

    Wang, X.-W

    C. Wang, X.-W. Zhang, X. Liu, Y. He, X. Xu, Y. Ran, T. Cao, and D. Xiao, Fractional Chern Insulator in Twisted Bilayer MoTe2, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 036501 (2024)

    work page 2024

  51. [51]

    Morales-Dur´ an, N

    N. Morales-Dur´ an, N. Wei, J. Shi, and A. H. MacDon- ald, Magic Angles and Fractional Chern Insulators in Twisted Homobilayer Transition Metal Dichalcogenides, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 096602 (2024)

    work page 2024

  52. [52]

    Y. Xia, Z. Han, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. Shan, and K. F. Mak, Superconductivity in twisted bilayer WSe 2, Nature (London)637, 833 (2025)

    work page 2025

  53. [53]

    Y. Guo, J. Pack, J. Swann, L. Holtzman, M. Cothrine, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, D. G. Mandrus, K. Barmak, J. Hone, A. J. Millis, A. Pasupathy, and C. R. Dean, Superconductivity in 5.0 ◦ twisted bilayer WSe 2, Nature (London)637, 839 (2025)

    work page 2025

  54. [54]

    Zhu, Y.-Z

    J. Zhu, Y.-Z. Chou, M. Xie, and S. Das Sarma, Super- conductivity in twisted transition metal dichalcogenide homobilayers, Phys. Rev. B111, L060501 (2025)

    work page 2025

  55. [55]

    Tuo, M.-R

    C. Tuo, M.-R. Li, Z. Wu, W. Sun, and H. Yao, Theory of topological superconductivity and antiferromagnetic correlated insulators in twisted bilayer WSe2, Nat. Com- mun.16, 9525 (2025)

    work page 2025

  56. [56]

    C. Mora, N. Regnault, and B. A. Bernevig, Flatbands and Perfect Metal in Trilayer Moir´ e Graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 026402 (2019)

    work page 2019

  57. [57]

    Z. Zhu, S. Carr, D. Massatt, M. Luskin, and E. Kaxi- ras, Twisted Trilayer Graphene: A Precisely Tunable Platform for Correlated Electrons, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 116404 (2020)

    work page 2020

  58. [58]

    Y. Mao, D. Guerci, and C. Mora, Supermoir´ e low-energy effective theory of twisted trilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. B107, 125423 (2023)

    work page 2023

  59. [59]

    Nakatsuji, T

    N. Nakatsuji, T. Kawakami, and M. Koshino, Multi- scale Lattice Relaxation in General Twisted Trilayer Graphenes, Phys. Rev. X13, 041007 (2023)

    work page 2023

  60. [60]

    Devakul, P

    T. Devakul, P. J. Ledwith, L.-Q. Xia, A. Uri, S. C. de la Barrera, P. Jarillo-Herrero, and L. Fu, Magic-angle helical trilayer graphene, Sci. Adv.9, eadi6063 (2023)

    work page 2023

  61. [61]

    J. C. Hoke, Y. Li, Y. Hu, J. May-Mann, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, T. Devakul, and B. E. Feldman, Imaging supermoir´ e relaxation in helical trilayer graphene, Nat. Mater. (2026)

    work page 2026

  62. [62]

    Guerci, Y

    D. Guerci, Y. Mao, and C. Mora, Nature of even and odd magic angles in helical twisted trilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. B109, 205411 (2024)

    work page 2024

  63. [63]

    C. Yang, J. May-Mann, Z. Zhu, and T. Devakul, Multi- moir´ e trilayer graphene: Lattice relaxation, electronic structure, and magic angles, Phys. Rev. B110, 115434 (2024)

    work page 2024

  64. [64]

    F. K. Popov and G. Tarnopolsky, Magic angle butterfly in twisted trilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. Res.5, 043079 (2023)

    work page 2023

  65. [65]

    Guerci, Y

    D. Guerci, Y. Mao, and C. Mora, Chern mosaic and ideal flat bands in equal-twist trilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. Res.6, L022025 (2024)

    work page 2024

  66. [66]

    Datta, D

    A. Datta, D. Guerci, M. O. Goerbig, and C. Mora, Helical trilayer graphene in magnetic field: Chern mosaic and higher Chern number ideal flat bands, Phys. Rev. B110, 075417 (2024)

    work page 2024

  67. [67]

    Y. H. Kwan, P. J. Ledwith, C. F. B. Lo, and T. Devakul, Strong-coupling topological states and phase transitions in helical trilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. B109, 125141 (2024)

    work page 2024

  68. [68]

    Y. H. Kwan, T. Tan, and T. Devakul, Fractional Chern mosaic in supermoir´ e graphene, Phys. Rev. Res.7, L032070 (2025)

    work page 2025

  69. [69]

    L.-Q. Xia, S. C. de la Barrera, A. Uri, A. Sharpe, Y. H. Kwan, Z. Zhu, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, D. Goldhaber-Gordon, L. Fu, T. Devakul, and P. Jarillo- 17 Herrero, Topological bands and correlated states in heli- cal trilayer graphene, Nat. Phys.21, 239 (2025)

    work page 2025

  70. [70]

    Bultinck, S

    N. Bultinck, S. Chatterjee, and M. P. Zaletel, Mechanism for Anomalous Hall Ferromagnetism in Twisted Bilayer Graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 166601 (2020)

    work page 2020

  71. [71]

    Bultinck, E

    N. Bultinck, E. Khalaf, S. Liu, S. Chatterjee, A. Vish- wanath, and M. P. Zaletel, Ground State and Hidden Symmetry of Magic-Angle Graphene at Even Integer Fill- ing, Phys. Rev. X10, 031034 (2020)

    work page 2020

  72. [72]

    Hermann, Periodic overlayers and moir´ e patterns: Theoretical studies of geometric properties, J

    K. Hermann, Periodic overlayers and moir´ e patterns: Theoretical studies of geometric properties, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter24, 314210 (2012)

    work page 2012

  73. [73]

    Leconte, S

    N. Leconte, S. Javvaji, J. An, A. Samudrala, and J. Jung, Relaxation effects in twisted bilayer graphene: A multi- scale approach, Phys. Rev. B106, 115410 (2022)

    work page 2022

  74. [74]

    Plimpton, Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics, J

    S. Plimpton, Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics, J. Comput. Phys.117, 1 (1995)

    work page 1995

  75. [75]

    M. Wen, S. Carr, S. Fang, E. Kaxiras, and E. B. Tad- mor, Dihedral-angle-corrected registry-dependent inter- layer potential for multilayer graphene structures, Phys. Rev. B98, 235404 (2018)

    work page 2018

  76. [76]

    Leconte, J

    N. Leconte, J. Jung, S. Leb` egue, and T. Gould, Moir´ e- pattern interlayer potentials in van der Waals materials in the random-phase approximation, Phys. Rev. B96, 195431 (2017)

    work page 2017

  77. [77]

    D. Park, C. Park, K. Yananose, E. Ko, B. Kim, R. En- gelke, X. Zhang, K. Davydov, M. Green, H.-M. Kim, S. H. Park, J. H. Lee, S.-G. Kim, H. Kim, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, S. M. Yang, K. Wang, P. Kim, Y.-W. Son, and H. Yoo, Unconventional domain tessellations in moir´ e-of- moir´ e lattices, Nature (London)641, 896 (2025)

    work page 2025

  78. [78]

    D. W. Brenner, O. A. Shenderova, J. A. Harrison, S. J. Stuart, B. Ni, and S. B. Sinnott, A second-generation reactive empirical bond order (REBO) potential energy expression for hydrocarbons, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 14, 783 (2002)

    work page 2002

  79. [79]

    Bitzek, P

    E. Bitzek, P. Koskinen, F. G¨ ahler, M. Moseler, and P. Gumbsch, Structural relaxation made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 170201 (2006)

    work page 2006

  80. [80]

    J. Jung, A. Raoux, Z. Qiao, and A. H. MacDonald, Ab initio theory of moir´ e superlattice bands in layered two- dimensional materials, Phys. Rev. B89, 205414 (2014)

    work page 2014

Showing first 80 references.