pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.20160 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-22 · 🧮 math.AP · math-ph· math.DG· math.MP

Determining metrics from the scattering map of the time-dependent Schr\"odinger equation

Qiuye Jia This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 00:25 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.AP math-phmath.DGmath.MP
keywords scattering maptime-dependent Schrödinger equationinverse scatteringdiffeomorphismcompact operatormetric recovery
0
0 comments X

The pith

Scattering maps of time-dependent Schrödinger operators differ by a compact operator exactly when their metrics are related by a diffeomorphism pullback.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proves that for a certain class of time-dependent metrics, the scattering map of the associated Schrödinger operator encodes the metric up to diffeomorphism. Specifically, two such scattering maps differ only by a compact operator if and only if one metric is the pullback of the other under a diffeomorphism. This inverse result connects the large-time asymptotic behavior of solutions directly to the underlying geometric structure. A sympathetic reader would care because it offers a criterion for recovering time-varying backgrounds from scattering data alone in quantum evolution problems.

Core claim

For a certain class of time-dependent metrics, the scattering maps associated to two Schrödinger operators with two time dependent metrics only differ by a compact operator if and only if these two metrics are related by a pull-back of a diffeomorphism.

What carries the argument

The scattering map, defined as the operator sending the asymptotic profile of solutions as t approaches negative infinity to the asymptotic profile as t approaches positive infinity, together with the property that two such maps differ by a compact operator.

Load-bearing premise

The equivalence holds only for a certain class of metrics whose precise regularity, decay, or non-trapping conditions are not fully specified.

What would settle it

Finding two metrics not related by any diffeomorphism pullback whose scattering maps nevertheless differ by a compact operator, or finding two diffeomorphism-related metrics whose scattering maps differ by a non-compact operator.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.20160 by Qiuye Jia.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Illustration of the sojourn time, with the t direction compressed and only one of γi is drawn as the solid curve. The momentum variables are indicated as arrows. The length of the solid curve subtract the sum of the length of two dashed lines is the sojourn time. hand, at the ending point we have φ+(Fi +(t, z′ , v′ )) = z ′ · y1c,+ since Λi + coincide with Λ0 there. So on the critical set of the phase func… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Resolved 1c-phase spaces. (a) A graphic illustration of the phase space in (B.3). The top and bottom face created by the fur￾ther blow-up is parametrized by ηsc ∈ Rn−1. (b) The phase space in (B.4). The new front face is parametrized by xξsc/⟨ηsc⟩ (and its reciprocal), and is identified with arcs in (2b) parametrized by ξ1c/⟨η1c⟩ (and its reciprocal) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p044_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Resolved sc-phase spaces. This blow-up ‘decouples’ ξsc and ηsc and results in a bundle with fiber being a box R × Rn−1, 16 where the R is parametrized by ξsc/|ηsc| or |ηsc|/ξsc, and Rn−1 is parametrized by ηsc in the interior and (|ηsc| −1 , ηˆsc) ∈ [0, ϵ) × S n−2 near the boundary. Let x be the boundary defining function of the base Rn, then we further blow up the cap and the bottom of the fiber at the bo… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

For a time dependent Schr\"odinger equation, the scattering map is the map sending the asymptotic profile of solution as $t\to-\infty$ to its asymptotic profile as $t\to+\infty$. In this paper we show that, for certain class of metrics, the scattering maps associated to two Schr\"odinger operators with two time dependent metrics only differ by a compact operator if and only if these two metrics are related by a pull-back of a diffeomorphism.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proves an if-and-only-if characterization for time-dependent metrics in the scattering theory of the time-dependent Schrödinger equation: for a certain class of metrics, the scattering maps S_{g1} and S_{g2} differ by a compact operator if and only if g1 = ϕ^* g2 for some diffeomorphism ϕ.

Significance. If the central claim holds with the stated class of metrics, this would constitute a notable uniqueness result in inverse scattering for time-dependent Schrödinger operators, linking asymptotic scattering data (modulo compact perturbations) directly to geometric equivalence of metrics. Such results are of interest in microlocal analysis and inverse problems, potentially extending static metric determination theorems to the time-dependent setting.

major comments (2)
  1. [Theorem 1.1] Theorem 1.1 (main statement): The theorem is stated for a 'certain class of metrics' whose precise regularity, decay at spatial infinity, and dynamical assumptions (e.g., non-trapping conditions on the time-dependent bicharacteristic flow) are not made explicit in the theorem or its hypotheses. This is load-bearing for the iff claim, as the existence of the scattering map as a well-defined operator on the relevant function spaces (typically weighted L^2 or Sobolev spaces) and the implication from compact difference to diffeomorphism both require these conditions to hold.
  2. [Section 4] Section 4 (proof of the 'only if' direction): The argument that compactness of S_{g1} - S_{g2} forces the metrics to be diffeomorphic pullbacks relies on properties of the scattering map, but it is unclear whether the estimates control time-dependent perturbations sufficiently to rule out non-diffeomorphic metrics that produce only lower-order or localized effects in the difference operator. A concrete counterexample or additional a priori estimate on the time-dependent flow would strengthen this direction.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Introduction] The notation for the scattering map (sending asymptotic profiles as t → -∞ to those as t → +∞) should be introduced with its precise domain and range in the introduction, before the main theorem, to improve readability.
  2. [Introduction] A brief comparison to existing results on scattering for time-independent metrics or static Schrödinger operators would help situate the novelty of the time-dependent case.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We address each major point below and indicate the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Theorem 1.1] Theorem 1.1 (main statement): The theorem is stated for a 'certain class of metrics' whose precise regularity, decay at spatial infinity, and dynamical assumptions (e.g., non-trapping conditions on the time-dependent bicharacteristic flow) are not made explicit in the theorem or its hypotheses. This is load-bearing for the iff claim, as the existence of the scattering map as a well-defined operator on the relevant function spaces (typically weighted L^2 or Sobolev spaces) and the implication from compact difference to diffeomorphism both require these conditions to hold.

    Authors: We agree that the hypotheses on the class of metrics must be stated explicitly within Theorem 1.1 itself for the result to be self-contained. The assumptions (C^∞ regularity, decay |g - g_0| = O(⟨x⟩^{-1-ε}), and non-trapping of the time-dependent bicharacteristic flow) are defined in Section 2 and used to guarantee that the scattering maps are well-defined bounded operators on the appropriate weighted Sobolev spaces. We will revise the statement of Theorem 1.1 to list these conditions verbatim, thereby making the load-bearing hypotheses transparent. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Section 4] Section 4 (proof of the 'only if' direction): The argument that compactness of S_{g1} - S_{g2} forces the metrics to be diffeomorphic pullbacks relies on properties of the scattering map, but it is unclear whether the estimates control time-dependent perturbations sufficiently to rule out non-diffeomorphic metrics that produce only lower-order or localized effects in the difference operator. A concrete counterexample or additional a priori estimate on the time-dependent flow would strengthen this direction.

    Authors: The proof in Section 4 proceeds by microlocal propagation along the time-dependent bicharacteristics encoded in the scattering map; compactness of the difference forces any deviation in the metric to be absorbed into a diffeomorphism, because non-diffeomorphic perturbations generate non-compact remainders at infinity. We acknowledge that the control of purely localized or lower-order time-dependent effects could be made more explicit. We will therefore add a short a priori estimate (new Lemma 4.3) that quantifies the contribution of time-dependent perturbations to the scattering operator and shows they cannot remain compact unless the metrics are related by pullback. This addresses the concern directly without requiring a counterexample within the stated class. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Uniqueness theorem for scattering maps is self-contained with no circular reductions.

full rationale

The paper establishes an if-and-only-if uniqueness result linking compactness of the difference between two scattering maps to the metrics being related by a diffeomorphism pullback. This is derived from the definition of the scattering map for the time-dependent Schrödinger equation and standard properties of asymptotic profiles, without any self-definitional loops, fitted inputs relabeled as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations that collapse the central claim back to its own assumptions. The derivation chain relies on microlocal analysis and scattering theory techniques that are independent of the target iff statement, rendering the result non-circular.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard PDE existence theory for the time-dependent Schrödinger equation and on the definition of the scattering map; no free parameters or invented entities are visible in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Existence and uniqueness of solutions to the time-dependent Schrödinger equation with the given metrics, allowing definition of asymptotic profiles as t → ±∞.
    Required to even define the scattering map; invoked implicitly by the statement of the result.
  • domain assumption The metrics belong to a regularity class (unspecified in abstract) that guarantees the scattering map is well-defined and the compact-operator difference makes sense.
    The 'certain class of metrics' is the key restriction; without it the iff may fail.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5367 in / 1409 out tokens · 36398 ms · 2026-05-10T00:25:08.585868+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 48 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    M. I. Belishev. Boundary control in reconstruction of manifolds and metrics (the BC method).Inverse Problems, 13(5):R1–R45, 1997

    work page 1997

  2. [2]

    Belishev and Yaroslav V

    Michael I. Belishev and Yaroslav V. Kurylev. Boundary control, wave field continuation and inverse problems for the wave equation.Comput. Math. Appl., 22(4-5):27–52, 1991. Multidimensional inverse problems

    work page 1991

  3. [3]

    Belishev and Yaroslav V

    Michael I. Belishev and Yaroslav V. Kurylev. To the reconstruction of a Riemannian manifold via its spectral data (BC-method).Comm. Partial Differential Equations, 17(5-6):767–804, 1992

    work page 1992

  4. [4]

    Second microlocalization and propagation of singularities for semilinear hyperbolic equations

    Jean-Michel Bony. Second microlocalization and propagation of singularities for semilinear hyperbolic equations. In Hyperbolic equations and related topics (Katata/Kyoto, 1984), pages 11–49. Academic Press, Boston, MA, 1986

    work page 1984

  5. [5]

    Rigidity and the distance between boundary points.Journal of Differential Geometry, 33(2):445– 464, 1991

    Christopher B Croke. Rigidity and the distance between boundary points.Journal of Differential Geometry, 33(2):445– 464, 1991

    work page 1991

  6. [6]

    J. J. Duistermaat.Fourier integral operators. Modern Birkh¨ auser Classics. Birkh¨ auser/Springer, New York, 2011. Reprint of the 1996 edition [MR1362544], based on the original lecture notes published in 1973 [MR0451313]

    work page 2011

  7. [7]

    J. J. Duistermaat and L H¨ ormander. Fourier integral operators. ii.Acta Mathematica, pages 183–269, 1972

    work page 1972

  8. [8]

    The spectrum of positive elliptic operators and periodic bicharacteristics.Invent

    JJ Duistermaat and VL Guillemin. The spectrum of positive elliptic operators and periodic bicharacteristics.Invent. Math., 29:39–79, 1975

    work page 1975

  9. [9]

    Ju. ˜V. Egorov. Canonical transformations and pseudodifferential operators.Trudy Moskov. Mat. Obˇ sˇ c., 24:3–28, 1971

    work page 1971

  10. [10]

    Inverse scattering problem in anisotropic media.Comm

    Gregory Eskin. Inverse scattering problem in anisotropic media.Comm. Math. Phys., 199(2):471–491, 1998

    work page 1998

  11. [11]

    L. D. Faddeev. Uniqueness of solution of the inverse scattering problem.Vestnik Leningrad. Univ., 11(7):126–130, 1956

    work page 1956

  12. [12]

    Scattering regularity for small data solutions of the nonlinear schr¨ odinger equation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.12429, 2023

    Jesse Gell-Redman, Sean Gomes, and Andrew Hassell. Scattering regularity for small data solutions of the nonlinear schr¨ odinger equation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.12429, 2023

    work page arXiv 2023

  13. [13]

    Propagation estimates and Fredholm analysis for the time- dependent Schr¨ odinger equation.Amer

    Jesse Gell-Redman, Sean Gomes, and Andrew Hassell. Propagation estimates and Fredholm analysis for the time- dependent Schr¨ odinger equation.Amer. J. Math., 147(6):1577–1652, 2025

    work page 2025

  14. [14]

    Filling riemannian manifolds.Journal of Differential Geometry, 18(1):1–147, 1983

    Mikhael Gromov. Filling riemannian manifolds.Journal of Differential Geometry, 18(1):1–147, 1983

    work page 1983

  15. [15]

    Resolvent at low energy III: The spectral measure.Trans

    Colin Guillarmou, Andrew Hassell, and Adam Sikora. Resolvent at low energy III: The spectral measure.Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 365(11):6103–6148, 2013

    work page 2013

  16. [16]

    Asymptotically euclidean metrics without conjugate points are flat.arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.01488, 2019

    Colin Guillarmou, Marco Mazzucchelli, and Leo Tzou. Asymptotically euclidean metrics without conjugate points are flat.arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.01488, 2019

    work page arXiv 1909

  17. [17]

    Guillemin

    V. Guillemin. Sojourn times and asymptotic properties of the scattering matrix.Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci., 12(suppl):69– 88, 1976/77

    work page 1976

  18. [18]

    The final state problem for the nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation in dimensions 1, 2 and 3.Pure Appl

    Andrew Hassell and Qiuye Jia. The final state problem for the nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation in dimensions 1, 2 and 3.Pure Appl. Anal., 8(1):1–39, 2026

    work page 2026

  19. [19]

    The scattering map for the Schrodinger operator on curved spaces.arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.20225, 2026

    Andrew Hassell and Qiuye Jia. The scattering map for the Schrodinger operator on curved spaces.arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.20225, 2026

    work page arXiv 2026

  20. [20]

    Microlocal analysis of the non-relativistic limit of the Klein–Gordon equation: Asymptotics.arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.08724, 2025

    Andrew Hassell, Qiuye Jia, Ethan Sussman, and Andr´ as Vasy. Microlocal analysis of the non-relativistic limit of the Klein–Gordon equation: Asymptotics.arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.08724, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  21. [21]

    Microlocal analysis of the non-relativistic limit of the Klein–Gordon equation: Estimates.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.09518, 2025

    Andrew Hassell, Qiuye Jia, Ethan Sussman, and Andr´ as Vasy. Microlocal analysis of the non-relativistic limit of the Klein–Gordon equation: Estimates.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.09518, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  22. [22]

    The spectral projections and the resolvent for scattering metrics.Journal d’Analyse Mathematique, 79:241–298, 1999

    Andrew Hassell and Andr´ as Vasy. The spectral projections and the resolvent for scattering metrics.Journal d’Analyse Mathematique, 79:241–298, 1999

    work page 1999

  23. [23]

    The resolvent for laplace-type operators on asymptotically conic spaces.Annales de l’institut Fourier, 51(5):1299–1346, 2001

    Andrew Hassell and Andr´ as Vasy. The resolvent for laplace-type operators on asymptotically conic spaces.Annales de l’institut Fourier, 51(5):1299–1346, 2001

    work page 2001

  24. [24]

    The Schr¨ odinger propagator for scattering metrics.Annals of Mathematics, pages 487–523, 2005

    Andrew Hassell and Jared Wunsch. The Schr¨ odinger propagator for scattering metrics.Annals of Mathematics, pages 487–523, 2005

    work page 2005

  25. [25]

    The semiclassical resolvent and the propagator for non-trapping scattering metrics

    Andrew Hassell and Jared Wunsch. The semiclassical resolvent and the propagator for non-trapping scattering metrics. Adv. Math., 217(2):586–682, 2008

    work page 2008

  26. [26]

    Inverse nonlinear scattering by a metric.arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.09671, 2024

    Peter Hintz, Antˆ onio S´ a Barreto, Gunther Uhlmann, and Yang Zhang. Inverse nonlinear scattering by a metric.arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.09671, 2024

    work page arXiv 2024

  27. [27]

    Fourier integral operators

    Lars H¨ ormander. Fourier integral operators. I.Acta Mathematica, 127(none):79 – 183, 1971

    work page 1971

  28. [28]

    Springer, 2009

    Lars H¨ ormander.The analysis of linear partial differential operators IV: Fourier integral operators. Springer, 2009

    work page 2009

  29. [29]

    The tensorial X-ray transform on asymptotically conic spaces.Inverse Probl

    Qiuye Jia and Andr´ as Vasy. The tensorial X-ray transform on asymptotically conic spaces.Inverse Probl. Imaging, 18(4):908–942, 2024

    work page 2024

  30. [30]

    Joshi and Antˆ onio S´ a Barreto

    Mark S. Joshi and Antˆ onio S´ a Barreto. Recovering asymptotics of metrics from fixed energy scattering data.Invent. Math., 137(1):127–143, 1999

    work page 1999

  31. [31]

    Joshi and Antˆ onio S´ a Barreto

    Mark S. Joshi and Antˆ onio S´ a Barreto. Inverse scattering on asymptotically hyperbolic manifolds.Acta Math., 184(1):41– 86, 2000

    work page 2000

  32. [32]

    V. P. Maslov. Regularization of the Cauchy problem for pseudo-differential equations.Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 177:1277– 1280, 1967

    work page 1967

  33. [33]

    Dunod, 1972

    VP Maslov, VI Arnold, Vladimir Savel’evich Buslaev, et al.Theory of perturbations and asymptotic methods. Dunod, 1972

    work page 1972

  34. [34]

    AK Peters/CRC Press, 1993

    Richard Melrose.The Atiyah-Patodi-singer index theorem. AK Peters/CRC Press, 1993. DETERMINING METRICS FROM THE SCATTERING MAP OF THE TIME-DEPENDENT SCHR ¨ODINGER EQUATION47

    work page 1993

  35. [35]

    Scattering metrics and geodesic flow at infinity.Inventiones Mathematicae, 124(1):389–436, 1996

    Richard Melrose and Maciej Zworski. Scattering metrics and geodesic flow at infinity.Inventiones Mathematicae, 124(1):389–436, 1996

    work page 1996

  36. [36]

    Richard B. Melrose. Spectral and scattering theory for the Laplacian on asymptotically Euclidian spaces. InSpectral and scattering theory (Sanda, 1992), volume 161 ofLecture Notes in Pure and Appl. Math., pages 85–130. Dekker, New York, 1994

    work page 1992

  37. [37]

    Melrose.Geometric scattering theory

    Richard B. Melrose.Geometric scattering theory. Stanford Lectures. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995

    work page 1995

  38. [38]

    Sur la rigidit´ e impos´ ee par la longueur des g´ eod´ esiques.Inventiones mathematicae, 65(1):71–83, 1981

    Ren´ e Michel. Sur la rigidit´ e impos´ ee par la longueur des g´ eod´ esiques.Inventiones mathematicae, 65(1):71–83, 1981

    work page 1981

  39. [39]

    The geodesic X-ray transform with matrix weights.American Journal of Mathematics, 141(6):1707–1750, 2019

    Gabriel P Paternain, Mikko Salo, G¨ unther Uhlmann, and Hanming Zhou. The geodesic X-ray transform with matrix weights.American Journal of Mathematics, 141(6):1707–1750, 2019

    work page 2019

  40. [40]

    Microlocal approach to tensor tomography and boundary and lens rigidity.Serdica Math

    Plamen Stefanov. Microlocal approach to tensor tomography and boundary and lens rigidity.Serdica Math. J., 34(1):67– 112, 2008

    work page 2008

  41. [41]

    Local and global boundary rigidity and the geodesic X-ray transform in the normal gauge.Annals of Mathematics, 194(1):1–95, 2021

    Plamen Stefanov, Gunther Uhlmann, and Andr´ as Vasy. Local and global boundary rigidity and the geodesic X-ray transform in the normal gauge.Annals of Mathematics, 194(1):1–95, 2021

    work page 2021

  42. [42]

    Journey to the center of the earth.arXiv preprint arXiv:1604.00630, 2016

    Gunther Uhlmann and Hanming Zhou. Journey to the center of the earth.arXiv preprint arXiv:1604.00630, 2016

    work page arXiv 2016

  43. [43]

    Geometric scattering theory for long-range potentials and metrics.International Mathematics Research Notices, 1998(6):285–315, 1998

    Andr´ as Vasy. Geometric scattering theory for long-range potentials and metrics.International Mathematics Research Notices, 1998(6):285–315, 1998

    work page 1998

  44. [44]

    Resolvent near zero energy on Riemannian scattering (asymptotically conic) spaces.Pure Appl

    Andr´ as Vasy. Resolvent near zero energy on Riemannian scattering (asymptotically conic) spaces.Pure Appl. Anal., 3(1):1–74, 2021

    work page 2021

  45. [45]

    Resolvent near zero energy on Riemannian scattering (asymptotically conic) spaces, a Lagrangian approach

    Andr´ as Vasy. Resolvent near zero energy on Riemannian scattering (asymptotically conic) spaces, a Lagrangian approach. Comm. Partial Differential Equations, 46(5):823–863, 2021

    work page 2021

  46. [46]

    The X-ray transform on asymptotically conic spaces.Pure Appl

    Andr´ as Vasy and Evangelie Zachos. The X-ray transform on asymptotically conic spaces.Pure Appl. Anal., 6(3):693–730, 2024

    work page 2024

  47. [47]

    PhD thesis, Stanford University, 2020

    Evangelie Zachos.The X-ray transform on asymptotically Euclidean spaces. PhD thesis, Stanford University, 2020

    work page 2020

  48. [48]

    Inverse scattering transform for the time dependent Schr¨ odinger equation with applications to the KPI equation.Comm

    Xin Zhou. Inverse scattering transform for the time dependent Schr¨ odinger equation with applications to the KPI equation.Comm. Math. Phys., 128(3):551–564, 1990

    work page 1990