pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.21694 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-23 · 💻 cs.CV · cs.AI· cs.IR

Efficient Logic Gate Networks for Video Copy Detection

Katarzyna Fojcik This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-09 21:48 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CV cs.AIcs.IR
keywords video copy detectionlogic gate networksefficient inferencebinary descriptorssimilarity estimationBoolean circuitsdeep learning alternativesframe miniaturization
0
0 comments X

The pith

Logic gate networks can match deep neural networks in video copy detection accuracy while using descriptors orders of magnitude smaller and running at over 11,000 samples per second.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper tries to establish that differentiable Logic Gate Networks offer a practical replacement for heavy deep neural networks in video copy detection. It trains compact models on miniaturized binary frames to learn logical operations, then converts them into fast Boolean circuits. If the claim holds, large-scale systems could perform similarity searches on vast video collections without prohibitive compute or storage demands. A sympathetic reader would care because current approaches hit practical limits at high throughput. The work tests this across multiple datasets, binarization methods, and similarity measures to show the logic-based approach stays competitive.

Core claim

The paper shows that LGN-based models achieve competitive or superior accuracy and ranking performance compared to prior models for video copy detection under diverse visual distortions, while producing descriptors several orders of magnitude smaller and delivering inference speeds exceeding 11k samples per second. The framework uses aggressive frame miniaturization, binary preprocessing, and a trainable LGN embedding model that learns both logical operations and interconnections, which is discretized after training into a purely Boolean circuit for efficient inference.

What carries the argument

Differentiable Logic Gate Networks (LGNs), which are models that learn logical operations and interconnections during training and can then be discretized into compact Boolean circuits for inference.

If this is right

  • High-throughput video search systems become feasible on modest hardware because inference runs at over 11,000 samples per second.
  • Storage costs for reference descriptors drop dramatically since they are orders of magnitude smaller than typical neural embeddings.
  • System designers can trade off different binarization schemes and similarity strategies without retraining heavy networks.
  • The same logic-based pipeline could support real-time monitoring of video streams at scale.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The approach might extend to other retrieval tasks where both speed and memory matter, such as large image databases.
  • Discretization could add a form of regularization that improves robustness to unseen distortions not present in training.
  • Energy use in data centers running video similarity checks would decrease if logic circuits replace floating-point operations.

Load-bearing premise

That the embeddings learned by a trainable LGN stay effective for matching videos under many distortions after the model is converted from floating-point weights into a fixed Boolean circuit.

What would settle it

Measuring whether accuracy on a held-out video copy detection dataset with varied distortions falls sharply when switching from the trained floating-point LGN to its discretized Boolean version.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.21694 by Katarzyna Fojcik.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Example of video frame with applied transformations. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: End-to-end workflow of the proposed framework, showing each stage from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Overview of LILogic Net training strategies a), b) used in this study and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Distribution of Accuracy, F1, and µAP across 12 evaluation folds for the 2000–Top32 and 4000–L LGN models. formance, reaching median F1 scores above 0.98 and µAP values close to 1.0. These models provide an effective balance between representational capacity and robustness. The accompanying boxplots for representative configurations (2000–Top32 and 4000–L) further illustrate this stability. Accuracy and F1… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Video copy detection requires robust similarity estimation under diverse visual distortions while operating at very large scale. Although deep neural networks achieve strong performance, their computational cost and descriptor size limit practical deployment in high-throughput systems. In this work, we propose a video copy detection framework based on differentiable Logic Gate Networks (LGNs), which replace conventional floating-point feature extractors with compact, logic-based representations. Our approach combines aggressive frame miniaturization, binary preprocessing, and a trainable LGN embedding model that learns both logical operations and interconnections. After training, the model can be discretized into a purely Boolean circuit, enabling extremely fast and memory-efficient inference. We systematically evaluate different similarity strategies, binarization schemes, and LGN architectures across multiple dataset folds and difficulty levels. Experimental results demonstrate that LGN-based models achieve competitive or superior accuracy and ranking performance compared to prior models, while producing descriptors several orders of magnitude smaller and delivering inference speeds exceeding 11k samples per second. These findings indicate that logic-based models offer a promising alternative for scalable and resource-efficient video copy detection.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a video copy detection framework that replaces conventional DNN feature extractors with differentiable Logic Gate Networks (LGNs). The approach uses aggressive frame miniaturization and binary preprocessing, trains an LGN that learns both logical operations and interconnections, then discretizes the trained model into a purely Boolean circuit. Experiments across dataset folds and difficulty levels claim that the resulting models achieve competitive or superior accuracy and ranking performance while producing descriptors orders of magnitude smaller and running at >11k samples per second.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the work would demonstrate that compact, logic-based representations can match or exceed DNN performance for large-scale video copy detection under distortions while delivering extreme gains in descriptor size and inference speed. The trainable-to-discretizable LGN pipeline is a concrete strength that directly addresses deployment constraints in high-throughput systems.

major comments (2)
  1. [Experimental Results / Evaluation Protocol] The manuscript provides no ablation that directly compares accuracy, ranking metrics, and similarity scores of the continuous differentiable LGN versus the final discretized Boolean circuit on identical folds and distortion sets. This comparison is load-bearing for the central claim, because the abstract and methods describe aggressive binarization and post-training discretization, yet small perturbations from compression or color shifts could flip gate outputs and degrade Hamming similarity without the reported performance being preserved.
  2. [Methods / LGN Architecture and Discretization] The description of the discretization procedure (how continuous gate weights and connections are snapped to hard Boolean logic) lacks sufficient detail on the exact mapping, any rounding thresholds, and the resulting circuit size in terms of gate count. Without these, it is impossible to verify the claimed descriptor sizes or the >11k samples/sec inference speed.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states competitive performance but supplies no numerical values for accuracy, mAP, or speed; adding at least one key metric and a baseline comparison would improve readability.
  2. [Figures and Tables] Figure captions and table headers should explicitly state whether reported numbers refer to the continuous or discretized model.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address the major comments point by point below and will incorporate revisions to strengthen the paper.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The manuscript provides no ablation that directly compares accuracy, ranking metrics, and similarity scores of the continuous differentiable LGN versus the final discretized Boolean circuit on identical folds and distortion sets. This comparison is load-bearing for the central claim, because the abstract and methods describe aggressive binarization and post-training discretization, yet small perturbations from compression or color shifts could flip gate outputs and degrade Hamming similarity without the reported performance being preserved.

    Authors: We agree that a direct side-by-side comparison of the continuous differentiable LGN and the discretized Boolean circuit is necessary to substantiate the central claims. In the revised manuscript we will add an ablation study that evaluates both versions on identical dataset folds and distortion sets, reporting accuracy, ranking metrics, and similarity scores to confirm that performance is preserved after discretization. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The description of the discretization procedure (how continuous gate weights and connections are snapped to hard Boolean logic) lacks sufficient detail on the exact mapping, any rounding thresholds, and the resulting circuit size in terms of gate count. Without these, it is impossible to verify the claimed descriptor sizes or the >11k samples/sec inference speed.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the current description of the discretization step is insufficiently detailed. In the revised Methods section we will provide the exact mapping from continuous gate weights and connections to Boolean logic, specify the rounding thresholds employed, and report the resulting gate counts for each circuit. These additions will enable independent verification of the reported descriptor sizes and inference speeds. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; claims rest on external dataset evaluations

full rationale

The paper trains differentiable LGN models on video data, discretizes them post-training into Boolean circuits, and reports accuracy/ranking metrics on standard external datasets with distortions. No equations or steps reduce by construction to fitted parameters or self-definitions; performance is measured against prior models on held-out folds rather than being tautological. The discretization is presented as a conversion step with empirical results, not a self-referential loop. This is a standard empirical ML paper structure with no load-bearing self-citation chains or ansatz smuggling visible in the provided text.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are stated.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5474 in / 944 out tokens · 36035 ms · 2026-05-09T21:48:37.475249+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

29 extracted references · 29 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international confer- ence on computer vision

    Arnab, A., Dehghani, M., Heigold, G., Sun, C., Lučić, M., Schmid, C.: Vivit: A video vision transformer. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international confer- ence on computer vision. pp. 6836–6846 (2021)

    work page 2021

  2. [2]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision

    Black, A., Jenni, S., Bui, T., Tanjim, M.M., Petrangeli, S., Sinha, R., Swami- nathan, V., Collomosse, J.: Vader: Video alignment differencing and retrieval. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision. pp. 22357–22367 (2023)

    work page 2023

  3. [3]

    Pattern Recognition130, 108807 (2022)

    Chiang, T.H., Tseng, Y.C., Tseng, Y.C.: A multi-embedding neural model for in- cident video retrieval. Pattern Recognition130, 108807 (2022)

    work page 2022

  4. [4]

    In: 2023 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP)

    Deng, R., Wu, Q., Li, Y.: 3d-csl: self-supervised 3d context similarity learning for near-duplicate video retrieval. In: 2023 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP). pp. 2880–2884. IEEE (2023)

    work page 2023

  5. [5]

    In: ICASSP 2024-2024 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP)

    Deng, R., Wu, Q., Li, Y., Fu, H.: Differentiable resolution compression and align- ment for efficient video classification and retrieval. In: ICASSP 2024-2024 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). pp. 3200–3204. IEEE (2024)

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    In: Asian Conference on Intelligent Information and Database Systems

    Fojcik, K., Syga, P.: Counteracting temporal attacks in video copy detection. In: Asian Conference on Intelligent Information and Database Systems. pp. 86–100. Springer (2025)

    work page 2025

  7. [7]

    Pattern Recognition158, 111016 (2025)

    Fojcik, K., Syga, P., Klonowski, M.: Extremely compact video representation for efficient near-duplicates detection. Pattern Recognition158, 111016 (2025)

    work page 2025

  8. [8]

    LILogic Net: Compact Logic Gate Networks with Learnable Connectivity for Efficient Hardware Deployment

    Fojcik, K., Zioma, R., Armaitis, J.: Lilogic net: Compact logic gate networks with learnable connectivity for efficient hardware deployment. arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.12340 (2025)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  9. [9]

    He,K.,Zhang,X.,Ren,S.,Sun,J.:Deepresiduallearningforimagerecognition.In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. pp. 770–778 (2016)

    work page 2016

  10. [10]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    He, S., Yang, X., Jiang, C., Liang, G., Zhang, W., Pan, T., Wang, Q., Xu, F., Li, C., Liu, J., et al.: A large-scale comprehensive dataset and copy-overlap aware evaluation protocol for segment-level video copy detection. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. pp. 21086– 21095 (2022)

    work page 2022

  11. [11]

    Advances in neural information processing systems29(2016)

    Hubara,I.,Courbariaux,M.,Soudry,D.,El-Yaniv,R.,Bengio,Y.:Binarizedneural networks. Advances in neural information processing systems29(2016)

    work page 2016

  12. [12]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision

    Jiang, Q.Y., He, Y., Li, G., Lin, J., Li, L., Li, W.J.: Svd: A large-scale short video dataset for near-duplicate video retrieval. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision. pp. 5281–5289 (2019)

    work page 2019

  13. [13]

    In: Computer Vision–ECCV 2014: 13th European Conference, Zurich, Switzerland

    Jiang, Y.G., Jiang, Y., Wang, J.: Vcdb: a large-scale database for partial copy detection in videos. In: Computer Vision–ECCV 2014: 13th European Conference, Zurich, Switzerland. pp. 357–371. Springer (2014) Efficient Logic Gate Networks for Video Copy Detection 15

    work page 2014

  14. [14]

    IEEE Transactions on Multimedia21(10), 2638– 2652 (2019)

    Kordopatis-Zilos, G., Papadopoulos, S., Patras, I., Kompatsiaris, I.: Fivr: Fine- grained incident video retrieval. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia21(10), 2638– 2652 (2019)

    work page 2019

  15. [15]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision

    Kordopatis-Zilos, G., Papadopoulos, S., Patras, I., Kompatsiaris, I.: Visil: Fine-grained spatio-temporal video similarity learning. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision. pp. 6351–6360 (2019)

    work page 2019

  16. [16]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition

    Kordopatis-Zilos, G., Tolias, G., Tzelepis, C., Kompatsiaris, I., Patras, I., Pa- padopoulos, S.: Self-supervised video similarity learning. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. pp. 4756–4766 (2023)

    work page 2023

  17. [17]

    In- ternational Journal of Computer Vision130(10), 2385–2407 (2022)

    Kordopatis-Zilos, G., Tzelepis, C., Papadopoulos, S., Kompatsiaris, I., Patras, I.: Dns: Distill-and-select for efficient and accurate video indexing and retrieval. In- ternational Journal of Computer Vision130(10), 2385–2407 (2022)

    work page 2022

  18. [18]

    Multimedia Tools and Applications79(7-8), 4749–4761 (2020)

    Li, J., Zhang, H., Wan, W., Sun, J.: Two-class 3d-cnn classifiers combination for video copy detection. Multimedia Tools and Applications79(7-8), 4749–4761 (2020)

    work page 2020

  19. [19]

    In: European conference on computer vision

    Liu, Z.e.a.: Reactnet: Towards precise binary neural network with generalized activation functions. In: European conference on computer vision. pp. 143–159. Springer (2020)

    work page 2020

  20. [20]

    In:ProceedingsoftheAAAIConferenceonArtificialIntelligence.vol.38,pp.4126– 4135 (2024)

    Ma, Z., Dong, J., Ji, S., Liu, Z., Zhang, X., Wang, Z., He, S., Qian, F., Zhang, X., Yang, L.: Let all be whitened: Multi-teacher distillation for efficient visual retrieval. In:ProceedingsoftheAAAIConferenceonArtificialIntelligence.vol.38,pp.4126– 4135 (2024)

    work page 2024

  21. [21]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems35, 2006–2018 (2022)

    Petersen, F., Borgelt, C., Kuehne, H., Deussen, O.: Deep differentiable logic gate networks. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems35, 2006–2018 (2022)

    work page 2006

  22. [22]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 37, 121185–121203 (2024)

    Petersen, F., Kuehne, H., Borgelt, C., Welzel, J., Ermon, S.: Convolutional differ- entiable logic gate networks. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 37, 121185–121203 (2024)

    work page 2024

  23. [23]

    Computer Vision and Image Understanding243, 103997 (2024)

    Pizzi, E., Kordopatis-Zilos, G., Patel, H., Postelnicu, G., Ravindra, S.N., Gupta, A., Papadopoulos, S., Tolias, G., Douze, M.: The 2023 video similarity dataset and challenge. Computer Vision and Image Understanding243, 103997 (2024)

    work page 2023

  24. [24]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition

    Revaud, J., Douze, M., Schmid, C., Jégou, H.: Event retrieval in large video col- lections with circulant temporal encoding. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. pp. 2459–2466 (2013)

    work page 2013

  25. [25]

    In: Bengio, Y., LeCun, Y

    Simonyan, K., Zisserman, A.: Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. In: Bengio, Y., LeCun, Y. (eds.) 3rd International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2015, San Diego, CA, USA, May 7-9, 2015, Conference Track Proceedings (2015)

    work page 2015

  26. [26]

    In: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM/SIGDA international symposium on field- programmable gate arrays

    Umuroglu, Y., Fraser, N.J., Gambardella, G., Blott, M., Leong, P., Jahre, M., Vissers, K.: Finn: A framework for fast, scalable binarized neural network infer- ence. In: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM/SIGDA international symposium on field- programmable gate arrays. pp. 65–74 (2017)

    work page 2017

  27. [27]

    In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM International Conference on Computing Frontiers

    Wang, X., Feng, C., Kang, X., Li, Y., Huang, Y., Ye, T.T.: Logic gate network inference acceleration with risc-v custom instruction set. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM International Conference on Computing Frontiers. pp. 205–211 (2025)

    work page 2025

  28. [28]

    International Journal of Multimedia Information Retrieval8(2), 61–78 (2019)

    Wary, A., Neelima, A.: A review on robust video copy detection. International Journal of Multimedia Information Retrieval8(2), 61–78 (2019)

    work page 2019

  29. [29]

    In: Proceedings of the 15th ACM international conference on Multimedia

    Wu, X., Hauptmann, A.G., Ngo, C.W.: Practical elimination of near-duplicates from web video search. In: Proceedings of the 15th ACM international conference on Multimedia. pp. 218–227 (2007)

    work page 2007