pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.22682 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-24 · 📡 eess.SP

Mobility Aware Power Control for VCSEL Based Indoor OWC

Walter Zibusiso Ncube , Ahmad Adnan Qidan , Taisir El-Gorashi , Jaafar M. H. Elmirghani This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 10:15 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.SP
keywords mobility aware power controlVCSELindoor optical wireless communicationenergy efficiencychannel predictionGauss-Markov modellearning-based mobility
0
0 comments X

The pith

Mobility-aware power control for VCSEL indoor optical links improves energy efficiency by predicting channel changes.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a power control framework for indoor optical wireless communication systems that rely on narrow VCSEL beams. These beams make performance sensitive to user movement and device tilting, so conventional power schemes often supply excess energy to guarantee connectivity. The new framework employs a hybrid Gauss-Markov model for continuous user paths together with a learning component for orientation shifts, then uses the resulting channel predictions to set transmit power. Simulations indicate this approach produces more accurate allocations and higher energy efficiency than static methods that disregard mobility. A reader would care because efficient power use is essential for scaling high-speed indoor wireless services without rapid battery drain or excess heat.

Core claim

The authors establish that a power control framework for dynamic indoor OWC networks, which explicitly incorporates mobility-driven channel variation through a hybrid Gauss-Markov and learning-based model, enables more accurate power allocation and improves energy efficiency compared with conventional schemes that ignore user movement and orientation changes.

What carries the argument

Hybrid Gauss-Markov and learning-based mobility model that predicts channel gain variations from movement continuity and behavior-driven orientation changes to guide power allocation decisions.

If this is right

  • Power allocation becomes more accurate when user mobility and orientation are forecasted.
  • Energy efficiency rises relative to conventional power control in dynamic indoor settings.
  • Excess optical power provisioning drops while connectivity reliability is maintained.
  • The framework supports multigigabit data rates with lower overall energy consumption.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The prediction approach could extend to multi-user scenarios where mobility also affects interference levels between beams.
  • Real-time hardware implementation would need low-complexity versions of the hybrid model to keep latency low.
  • Pairing the mobility predictions with adaptive beam steering might reduce the need for power adjustments altogether.
  • Testing against large-scale measured indoor mobility traces would reveal how well the model generalizes beyond simulation.

Load-bearing premise

The hybrid model must capture real user mobility patterns and device orientation changes sufficiently well that its channel predictions produce genuinely better power decisions than schemes without mobility awareness.

What would settle it

Compare energy efficiency in controlled simulations or experiments using actual recorded user trajectories and device tilts against the same setup with the hybrid model's predictions replaced by no prediction or perfect foresight.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.22682 by Ahmad Adnan Qidan, Jaafar M. H. Elmirghani, Taisir El-Gorashi, Walter Zibusiso Ncube.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: User Mobility. transmission. The APs provide coverage for a set of users, U, u = {1, . . . , U}, located on the communication plane. The users are distributed randomly and vary over time due to mobility. Each user is equipped with an angle diversity receiver (ADR). Users may arrive, depart, and move within the coverage region over time and multi-user interference is mitigated using zero-forcing (ZF) precod… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Mobility Prediction Accuracy.                 view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Energy Efficiency Performance at user speed of 1m/s. view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Impact of Mobility Speed for 10 users. VI. CONCLUSIONS This paper presented a mobility-aware power control frame￾work for VCSEL-based indoor OWC networks. The pro￾posed approach integrates mobility prediction, and channel estimation to proactively allocate transmit power according to anticipated network conditions. User mobility is modelled using a hybrid GM-ANN framework that captures both motion dynamics… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Optical wireless communication (OWC) is a promising technology for supporting data intensive services in indoor environments due to its large unregulated spectrum, high spatial reuse, and potential for multigigabit data rates. In particular, vertical cavity surface emitting laser (VCSEL) based systems enable highly directional transmission, allowing efficient spatial separation of users and improved link performance. However, the use of narrow optical beams also makes system performance highly sensitive to user mobility and device orientation, as movement directly affects beam alignment and optical channel gain. Consequently, power allocation strategies that ignore mobility dynamics often provision excess optical power to maintain reliable connectivity, resulting in inefficient energy use. In this work, a power control framework for dynamic indoor OWC networks that explicitly accounts for mobility driven channel variation is developed. It uses a hybrid Gauss Markov and learning based approach that captures both user movement continuity and behaviour driven orientation changes. The mobility states are then used to guide power allocation decisions. Simulation results show that incorporating mobility aware channel prediction enables more accurate power allocation, and improves energy efficiency compared with conventional power control schemes in dynamic indoor environments.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper develops a mobility-aware power control scheme for VCSEL-based indoor optical wireless communication networks. It introduces a hybrid Gauss-Markov and learning-based predictor to model user movement continuity and device orientation changes, using the resulting channel gain estimates to inform power allocation decisions. Simulation results are presented claiming improved energy efficiency relative to conventional power control methods that ignore mobility dynamics.

Significance. If the hybrid predictor produces channel estimates sufficiently accurate to drive superior power decisions under realistic mobility, the framework could meaningfully reduce excess optical power provisioning in dynamic indoor OWC scenarios, supporting more energy-efficient high-rate links. The combination of stochastic mobility modeling with learning for orientation effects is a plausible direction, though its practical value hinges on validation beyond synthetic traces.

major comments (2)
  1. [Simulation Results] The central claim—that mobility-aware channel prediction yields measurably better power allocation and energy efficiency—rests on the unverified premise that the hybrid model's output gains are close enough to ground truth to exploit the margin over conventional schemes. The manuscript reports only simulation results with no measured VCSEL link traces, no cross-validation against real mobility/orientation data, and no sensitivity analysis to model mismatch or prediction error; if predictor error exceeds the exploitable margin, the reported gains disappear. This is the load-bearing assumption for the headline result.
  2. [Proposed Approach] No details are supplied on the learning component (training data, loss function, architecture, or regularization) or on how the hybrid model is fitted versus evaluated. If the learning stage uses the same mobility traces as the evaluation scenarios, the efficiency gains reduce to in-sample performance rather than out-of-sample prediction, undermining the claim of genuine improvement in dynamic environments.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract and introduction would benefit from a concise statement of the specific performance metrics (e.g., EE gain in bits/Joule or power savings in dB) and the exact conventional baselines used, rather than the generic phrase 'conventional power control schemes'.
  2. [System Model] Notation for channel gain, mobility state, and power variables should be defined once in a dedicated nomenclature table or at first use in the system model section to improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed comments. We address each major point below and indicate the revisions we will make to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Simulation Results] The central claim—that mobility-aware channel prediction yields measurably better power allocation and energy efficiency—rests on the unverified premise that the hybrid model's output gains are close enough to ground truth to exploit the margin over conventional schemes. The manuscript reports only simulation results with no measured VCSEL link traces, no cross-validation against real mobility/orientation data, and no sensitivity analysis to model mismatch or prediction error; if predictor error exceeds the exploitable margin, the reported gains disappear. This is the load-bearing assumption for the headline result.

    Authors: We agree that the current evaluation is limited to synthetic simulations and does not include measured VCSEL link traces or cross-validation with real mobility and orientation data. This is a genuine limitation of the work, as acquiring such experimental traces would require a dedicated hardware testbed and measurement campaign beyond the scope of this study. To directly address the concern regarding the load-bearing assumption, we will add a sensitivity analysis in the revised manuscript that quantifies how the reported energy-efficiency gains degrade as a function of increasing prediction error. This will clarify the margin under which the mobility-aware scheme remains advantageous. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Proposed Approach] No details are supplied on the learning component (training data, loss function, architecture, or regularization) or on how the hybrid model is fitted versus evaluated. If the learning stage uses the same mobility traces as the evaluation scenarios, the efficiency gains reduce to in-sample performance rather than out-of-sample prediction, undermining the claim of genuine improvement in dynamic environments.

    Authors: We accept that the description of the learning component is insufficient. In the revised version we will add a dedicated subsection detailing the neural-network architecture, the loss function, regularization techniques, and the procedure used to generate training data. We will also explicitly state that the hybrid model is trained on one set of mobility traces and evaluated on disjoint, unseen traces to ensure out-of-sample performance, thereby clarifying that the reported gains are not merely in-sample results. revision: yes

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • The absence of real-world measured VCSEL link traces and experimental cross-validation against actual user mobility and device orientation data, which cannot be supplied within the current simulation-based study.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivation relies on independent hybrid modeling and simulation evaluation

full rationale

The abstract presents a hybrid Gauss-Markov plus learning-based mobility model whose outputs are fed into power allocation, with performance assessed via simulation against conventional schemes. No equations, parameter-fitting descriptions, or self-citations are supplied that would reduce the reported channel predictions or efficiency gains to in-sample fits or self-definitional constructs. The modeling choice and simulation comparison remain logically independent of the target results; any concern about training/evaluation overlap on synthetic traces is an external validation issue, not a reduction by construction within the paper's stated chain.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract provides no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; assessment is therefore limited to the high-level claim that the hybrid model improves allocation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5507 in / 990 out tokens · 69003 ms · 2026-05-08T10:15:02.900195+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

23 extracted references · 23 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    A review of ind oor optical wireless communication,

    H. Weng, W. Wang, Z. Chen, B. Zhu, and F. Li, “A review of ind oor optical wireless communication,” Photonics, vol. 11, no. 8, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6732/1 1/8/722

    work page 2024

  2. [2]

    On the energy efficiency of laser-based optical wireless ne tworks,

    W. Z. Ncube, A. A. Qidan, T. El-Gorashi, and M. H. Jaafar El mirghani, “On the energy efficiency of laser-based optical wireless ne tworks,” in 2022 IEEE 8th International Conference on Network Softwari zation (NetSoft), 2022, pp. 7–12

    work page 2022

  3. [3]

    A tb/s indoor optical wireless access system using vcsel arrays,

    E. Sarbazi, H. Kazemi, M. Soltani, M. Safari, and H. Haas, “A tb/s indoor optical wireless access system using vcsel arrays,” in IEEE PIMRC, 2020, pp. 1–6

    work page 2020

  4. [4]

    Optimised energy efficiency of various cell sizes in laser- based optical wireless communications,

    W. Z. Ncube, A. A. Qidan, T. El-Gorashi, and J. M. H. Elmirg hani, “Optimised energy efficiency of various cell sizes in laser- based optical wireless communications,” in 2024 IEEE International Mediterranean Conference on Communications and Networking (MeditCom) , 2024, pp. 389–394

    work page 2024

  5. [5]

    Intelligent reflecting surfaces assiste d laser-based optical wireless communication networks,

    A. N. Hamad, W. Z. Ncube, A. A. Qidan, T. E. El-Gorashi, and J. M. Elmirghani, “Intelligent reflecting surfaces assiste d laser-based optical wireless communication networks,” in 2024 24th International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks (ICTON) , 2024, pp. 1–5

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    Achieving 70 gb/s over a vcsel-based optical wi reless link using a multi-mode fiber-coupled receiver,

    H. Kazemi, I. N. O. Osahon, N. Ledentsov, I. Titkov, N. Led entsov, and H. Haas, “Achieving 70 gb/s over a vcsel-based optical wi reless link using a multi-mode fiber-coupled receiver,” Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. 43, no. 24, pp. 10 986–10 994, 2025

    work page 2025

  7. [7]

    Modeling the random orientation of mobile devices: Measur ement, analysis and lifi use case,

    M. D. Soltani, A. A. Purwita, Z. Zeng, H. Haas, and M. Safar i, “Modeling the random orientation of mobile devices: Measur ement, analysis and lifi use case,” IEEE Transactions on Communications , vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 2157–2172, 2019

    work page 2019

  8. [8]

    An orientation-based random waypoint model for user mobility in wireless networks,

    M. Dehghani Soltani, A. A. Purwita, Z. Zeng, C. Chen, H. Ha as, and M. Safari, “An orientation-based random waypoint model for user mobility in wireless networks,” in 2020 IEEE International Conference on Communications W orkshops (ICC W orkshops), 2020, pp. 1–6

    work page 2020

  9. [9]

    Performance analysis of m-aodv routing protocol for video streaming using gauss-markov an d random waypoint mobility models in manets,

    M. K. M, B. M. R, and G. V , “Performance analysis of m-aodv routing protocol for video streaming using gauss-markov an d random waypoint mobility models in manets,” in 2025 International Conference on Electronics and Computing, Communication Networking Au tomation Technologies (ICEC2NT), 2025, pp. 1–6

    work page 2025

  10. [10]

    A comparative study of ran - dom waypoint and gauss-markov mobility models in the perfor mance evaluation of manet,

    T. D. Nguyen and A. A. Kassem, “A comparative study of ran - dom waypoint and gauss-markov mobility models in the perfor mance evaluation of manet,” International Journal of Computer Networks & Communications, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 1–15, 2015

    work page 2015

  11. [11]

    Non-stationar y mobile-to- mobile channel modeling using the gauss-markov mobility mo del,

    R. He, B. Ai, G. L. St¨ uber, and Z. Zhong, “Non-stationar y mobile-to- mobile channel modeling using the gauss-markov mobility mo del,” in IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC) . IEEE, 2017, pp. 1–6

    work page 2017

  12. [12]

    Spatiotemporal mobility predi ction in proac- tive self-organizing cellular networks,

    H. Farooq and A. Imran, “Spatiotemporal mobility predi ction in proac- tive self-organizing cellular networks,” IEEE Communications Letters , vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 370–373, 2017

    work page 2017

  13. [13]

    Adege, H.-P

    A. Adege, H.-P . Lin, G. Tarekegn, and Y . Y ayeh, Mobility Prediction in Wireless Networks Using Deep Learning Algorithm . Springer, 03 2020, pp. 454–461

    work page 2020

  14. [14]

    Indoor mobility prediction for mmwave communications using marko v chain,

    A. Turkmen, S. Ansari, P . V . Klaine, L. Zhang, and M. A. Im ran, “Indoor mobility prediction for mmwave communications using marko v chain,” in 2021 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conferen ce (WCNC), 2021, pp. 1–5

    work page 2021

  15. [15]

    Mobility-aware cluster federated learning in hierarchic al wireless networks,

    C. Feng, H. H. Y ang, D. Hu, Z. Zhao, T. Q. S. Quek, and G. Min , “Mobility-aware cluster federated learning in hierarchic al wireless networks,” 2021. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org /abs/2108.09103

    work page arXiv 2021

  16. [16]

    A Hybrid Gauss Markov LSTM Mobility Model for Indoor OWC

    W. Z. Ncube, A. A. Qidan, T. El-Gorashi, and J. M. H. Elmir ghani, “A hybrid gauss markov lstm mobility model for indoor owc,” 2 026. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.19935

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  17. [17]

    Q-learning algorithm for resource all ocation in wdma-based optical wireless communication networks,

    A. S. Elgamal, O. Z. Aletri, A. A. Qidan, T. E. El-Gorashi , and J. M. H. Elmirghani, “Q-learning algorithm for resource all ocation in wdma-based optical wireless communication networks,” i n 2021 6th International Conference on Smart and Sustainable Tech nologies (SpliTech), 2021, pp. 1–5

    work page 2021

  18. [19]

    Resource allocation v ia model-free deep learning in free space optical communications,

    Z. Gao, M. Eisen, and A. Ribeiro, “Resource allocation v ia model-free deep learning in free space optical communications,” IEEE Transactions on Communications , vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 920–934, 2022

    work page 2022

  19. [20]

    Resource allocation in irs-aided optical wir eless communi- cation systems,

    A. N. Hamad, A. Adnan Qidan, T. E. El-Gorashi, and J. M. H. Elmirghani, “Resource allocation in irs-aided optical wir eless communi- cation systems,” in 2023 23rd International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks (ICTON) , 2023, pp. 1–5

    work page 2023

  20. [21]

    Coo perative artifi- cial neural networks for rate-maximization in optical wire less networks,

    A. A. Qidan, T. El-Gorashi, and J. M. H. Elmirghani, “Coo perative artifi- cial neural networks for rate-maximization in optical wire less networks,” in ICC 2023 - IEEE International Conference on Communications , 2023, pp. 1143–1148

    work page 2023

  21. [22]

    A comprehensive comparison between terahertz and optical wi reless com- munications,

    M. Liu, H. Kazemi, M. Safari, I. Tavakkolnia, and H. Haas , “A comprehensive comparison between terahertz and optical wi reless com- munications,” npj Wireless Technology, vol. 1, p. 3, 2025

    work page 2025

  22. [23]

    An orientation-based random waypoint model for user mobility in wireless networks,

    M. Dehghani Soltani, A. A. Purwita, Z. Zeng, C. Chen, H. H aas, and M. Safari, “An orientation-based random waypoint model for user mobility in wireless networks,” in 2020 IEEE International Conference on Communications W orkshops (ICC W orkshops), 2020, pp. 1–6

    work page 2020

  23. [24]

    Beam propagation and the abcd ray matr ices,

    P . A. B´ elanger, “Beam propagation and the abcd ray matr ices,” Opt. Lett., vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 196–198, Feb 1991. [Online]. Available: https://opg.optica.org/ol/abstract.cfm?URI=ol-16-4-196

    work page 1991