pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.24193 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-27 · 💻 cs.CV

Computer Vision-Based Early Detection of Container Loss at Sea

Vishakha Lall , Capt. Stanley S Pinto , Capt. Chu Xing Peng , Wu Kaiwen This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 04:42 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CV
keywords computer visioncontainer loss detectionoptical flowmaritime safetyobject segmentationship monitoringearly warning system
0
0 comments X

The pith

A computer vision system detects destabilized containers on ships by measuring their residual motion with optical flow.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The authors present a retrofittable computer vision pipeline that uses existing onboard cameras to identify container stacks and track their motion separately from the vessel's movement. By extracting residual motion of individual containers, the system aims to flag early signs of destabilization before loss occurs. This addresses the need for evidence-based detection amid new IMO reporting mandates for lost containers. Tests on real ship footage indicate it works across different sea states and visibility. If successful, it would allow proactive crew responses to improve safety and compliance.

Core claim

The paper establishes that integrating object segmentation to isolate container stacks with temporal object tracking via optical flow and residual motion extraction can quantify relative container movement, enabling early detection of destabilised stacks in challenging maritime conditions as demonstrated on real onboard footage.

What carries the argument

Object segmentation combined with optical flow for residual motion extraction after vessel motion compensation.

If this is right

  • Provides early alerts allowing crew intervention and navigational adjustments.
  • Improves cargo safety and operational resilience in dynamic sea conditions.
  • Facilitates compliance with IMO mandatory reporting requirements for lost containers.
  • Offers a low-cost solution using existing ship cameras without additional hardware.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Integration with automated ship systems could enable real-time responses without constant human monitoring.
  • Similar techniques might monitor other cargo or equipment stability on vessels.
  • The approach could contribute to broader maritime AI applications for predictive maintenance and safety.

Load-bearing premise

That the residual motion isolated after subtracting vessel motion corresponds to destabilization of containers rather than normal flexing, vibrations, or other benign movements.

What would settle it

Video sequences where containers remain stable but the system frequently detects high residual motion due to waves or camera shake would falsify the claim that residual motion reliably indicates destabilization.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.24193 by Capt. Chu Xing Peng, Capt. Stanley S Pinto, Vishakha Lall, Wu Kaiwen.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Loss and performance metrics for fine-tuned container segmentation model view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Segmentation samples from test dataset (a,e) original frame and segmented containers view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Temporal tracking samples from the test dataset, each container is annotated with view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Sample frames illustrating relative container motion, where per-container movement view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Our proposed method identifies early container instability at earlier timestamps than view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Containerised shipping underpins global trade, yet container loss at sea remains a persistent safety, environmental, and economic challenge. Despite compliance with Cargo Securing Manuals, dynamic maritime conditions such as vessel motion, wind loading, and severe sea states can progressively destabilise container stacks, leading to overboard losses. With the new International Maritime Organisation's (IMO) mandatory reporting requirements for lost containers, there is an urgent need for a reliable, evidence-based early detection solution for destabilised containers. This study showcases a low-cost, retrofittable computer vision-based system for early detection of destabilised containers using existing onboard cameras. The framework integrates object segmentation to isolate container stacks, temporal object tracking using optical flow and individual objects' residual motion extraction to quantify relative movement. Experimental evaluation on real onboard ship footage demonstrates that the proposed pipeline effectively isolates container-level motion under challenging conditions of varying sea states and visibility conditions. By enabling early alerts for crew intervention and navigational adjustment, the proposed approach enhances cargo safety, operational resilience, and regulatory compliance.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a retrofittable computer-vision pipeline for early detection of destabilized container stacks at sea. It combines instance segmentation to isolate containers, optical-flow tracking, vessel-motion compensation, and residual-motion extraction to flag progressive destabilization from onboard camera footage. The central claim is that this pipeline isolates container-level motion effectively on real ship videos across varying sea states and visibility conditions, enabling timely crew intervention.

Significance. A validated version of the approach could supply a low-cost, evidence-based tool for IMO-mandated lost-container reporting and cargo-safety monitoring. The use of existing cameras and established CV primitives (segmentation + optical flow) is practically attractive, but the absence of any quantitative validation currently limits the work to a proof-of-concept demonstration.

major comments (2)
  1. [Experimental Evaluation] Experimental Evaluation section: the manuscript asserts that the pipeline 'effectively isolates container-level motion' on real onboard footage yet supplies no precision/recall, false-positive rates, baseline comparisons (e.g., against simple frame differencing or vessel-motion-only models), or ground-truth event labels. Without these, the mapping from residual optical flow to actual destabilization versus normal cargo flex, camera vibration, or spray remains untested.
  2. [Method] Method (residual-motion extraction): after vessel-motion subtraction, no explicit threshold, temporal consistency criterion, or procedure for separating progressive stack destabilization from intra-stack shifting under wave loading is provided. This directly affects the weakest assumption that residual flow reliably indicates loss risk.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figures] Figure captions and text should clarify the exact camera placement, frame rate, and sea-state descriptors used in the real-footage experiments.
  2. [Introduction] The abstract and introduction cite IMO reporting requirements; a brief reference to the specific IMO circular or regulation number would strengthen the motivation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments, which help clarify the scope and limitations of our proof-of-concept study. We address each major comment below, indicating planned revisions to improve the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Experimental Evaluation section: the manuscript asserts that the pipeline 'effectively isolates container-level motion' on real onboard footage yet supplies no precision/recall, false-positive rates, baseline comparisons (e.g., against simple frame differencing or vessel-motion-only models), or ground-truth event labels. Without these, the mapping from residual optical flow to actual destabilization versus normal cargo flex, camera vibration, or spray remains untested.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the evaluation is qualitative rather than quantitative and does not include precision/recall metrics, false-positive rates, or formal baseline comparisons. Ground-truth labels for destabilization events are difficult to obtain from operational ship footage without additional synchronized instrumentation, which was outside the scope of this initial demonstration. In revision we will expand the Experimental Evaluation section to state these limitations explicitly, describe the proof-of-concept nature of the work, and add further visual side-by-side examples against simple frame-differencing baselines to illustrate the contribution of the residual-motion stage. revision: partial

  2. Referee: Method (residual-motion extraction): after vessel-motion subtraction, no explicit threshold, temporal consistency criterion, or procedure for separating progressive stack destabilization from intra-stack shifting under wave loading is provided. This directly affects the weakest assumption that residual flow reliably indicates loss risk.

    Authors: We agree that the residual-motion extraction step would benefit from greater specificity. The revised manuscript will document the exact magnitude threshold applied to residual flow, the temporal consistency window (minimum number of consecutive frames with elevated residual motion), and the empirical rationale used to separate sustained progressive destabilization from transient wave-induced intra-stack shifts. These additions will make the decision procedure reproducible and will directly address the concern about the reliability of residual flow as a loss-risk indicator. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; direct application of established CV techniques to new domain

full rationale

The paper presents an applied computer vision pipeline (segmentation + optical flow + residual motion) evaluated on real onboard footage. No mathematical derivation chain exists that reduces predictions or results to inputs by construction. No equations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, self-definitional steps, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the abstract or described method. The evaluation claim rests on empirical demonstration rather than tautological re-expression of the method itself. This is a standard non-circular engineering application paper.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

No free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are introduced; the work rests on standard computer vision primitives and the assumption that onboard cameras capture usable footage.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5482 in / 967 out tokens · 28067 ms · 2026-05-08T04:42:22.032277+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

14 extracted references · 14 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Evaluation of the factors causing container lost at sea through fuzzy-based Bayesian network

    ¨Ozt¨ urk OB. Evaluation of the factors causing container lost at sea through fuzzy-based Bayesian network. Regional Studies in Marine Science. 2024;73:103466. Available from:https://www. sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352485524000999

    work page 2024

  2. [2]

    Experimental and numerical investigation on dynamic response of a four-tier container stack and lashing system subject to rolling and pitching excitation

    Li C, Wang D, Liu J, Cai Z. Experimental and numerical investigation on dynamic response of a four-tier container stack and lashing system subject to rolling and pitching excitation. Applied Ocean Research. 2021;109:102553. Available from:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/ pii/S0141118721000304

    work page 2021

  3. [3]

    Data-Driven Analysis of Causes and Risk Assessment of Marine Container Losses: Development of a Predictive Model Using Machine Learning and Statistical Approaches

    Yi MS, Lee BK, Park JS. Data-Driven Analysis of Causes and Risk Assessment of Marine Container Losses: Development of a Predictive Model Using Machine Learning and Statistical Approaches. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 2025;13(3). Available from:https://www.mdpi.com/ 2077-1312/13/3/420

    work page 2025

  4. [4]

    MASTIC 2018

    In: Maritime Safety International Conference (MASTIC 2018). MASTIC 2018. Clausius Scientific Press; 2019. Available from:http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/mastic.030

    work page doi:10.23977/mastic.030 2018

  5. [5]

    Transport, weathering and pollution of plastic from container losses at sea: Observations from a spillage of inkjet cartridges in the North Atlantic Ocean

    Turner A, Williams T, Pitchford T. Transport, weathering and pollution of plastic from container losses at sea: Observations from a spillage of inkjet cartridges in the North Atlantic Ocean. Environ- mental Pollution. 2021 Sep;284:117131. Available from:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol. 2021.117131

    work page doi:10.1016/j.envpol 2021

  6. [6]

    Masset, R

    Wan S, Yang X, Chen X, Qu Z, An C, Zhang B, et al. Emerging marine pollution from container ship accidents: Risk characteristics, response strategies, and regulation advancements. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2022 Nov;376:134266. Available from:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. jclepro.2022.134266

    work page doi:10.1016/j 2022

  7. [7]

    Towards a Global Surveillance System for Lost Containers at Sea

    Molina-Padr´ on N, Cabrera-Almeida F, Ara˜ na-Pulido V, Tovar B. Towards a Global Surveillance System for Lost Containers at Sea. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 2024 Feb;12(2):299. Available from:http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jmse12020299

    work page doi:10.3390/jmse12020299 2024

  8. [8]

    The ConTAD Project: Detection of Multi- Container Loss for Safety of Navigation

    Oberjatzas M, Denker C, W¨ ustner HC, Schmidt M. The ConTAD Project: Detection of Multi- Container Loss for Safety of Navigation. Engineering Proceedings. 2025;88(1). Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4591/88/1/6

    work page 2025

  9. [9]

    Automatic detection and extraction of lost shipping containers based on YOLO and the segment anything model

    Li H, Yang Y, Wang S, Chen Z, He L. Automatic detection and extraction of lost shipping containers based on YOLO and the segment anything model. Remote Sensing Letters. 2024 Sep;15(10):1023–1034. Available from:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2150704x.2024.2398814

    work page doi:10.1080/2150704x.2024.2398814 2024

  10. [10]

    Real-time monitoring of container stability loss using wireless vibration sensor tags

    Bukkapatnam STS, Mukkamala S, Kunthong J, Sarangan V, Komanduri R. Real-time monitoring of container stability loss using wireless vibration sensor tags. In: 2009 IEEE International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering; 2009. p. 221-6

    work page 2009

  11. [11]

    Ultralytics YOLO11; 2024

    Jocher G, Qiu J. Ultralytics YOLO11; 2024. Available from:https://github.com/ultralytics/ ultralytics

    work page 2024

  12. [12]

    Simple Online and Realtime Tracking with a Deep Association Metric

    Wojke N, Bewley A, Paulus D. Simple Online and Realtime Tracking with a Deep Association Metric. In: 2017 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP). IEEE; 2017. p. 3645-9

    work page 2017

  13. [13]

    Deep Cosine Metric Learning for Person Re-identification

    Wojke N, Bewley A. Deep Cosine Metric Learning for Person Re-identification. In: 2018 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV). IEEE; 2018. p. 748-56

    work page 2018

  14. [14]

    Two-frame motion estimation based on polynomial expansion

    Farneb¨ ack G. Two-frame motion estimation based on polynomial expansion. In: Proceedings of the 13th Scandinavian Conference on Image Analysis. SCIA’03. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag

    work page