pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.25234 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-28 · 📡 eess.SP

Multi-Static ISAC Assisted by Double-Side Fluid Antenna System

Qinyuan Zheng , Pengcheng Zhu This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 15:30 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.SP
keywords integrated sensing and communicationfluid antenna systemmulti-static ISACposition optimizationbeamformingtarget detection probabilityalternating optimization
0
0 comments X

The pith

Double-side fluid antennas in multi-static ISAC raise target detection probability while meeting communication quality requirements.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper sets out a joint optimization that adjusts fluid antenna positions on both transmit and receive sides together with transmit beamforming to maximize the probability of detecting a target in a multi-static integrated sensing and communication system. The approach uses a penalty method to manage the coupling between positions and beamforming, then solves the resulting subproblems in alternation: semidefinite relaxation for beamforming, majorization-minimization for transmit positions, and gradient ascent for receive positions after reformulating feasibility as an SINR maximization task. A reader would care because the method delivers measurable gains in both noise-limited and interference-limited regimes without requiring an initial feasible point, pointing toward more flexible spatial resource use in future networks that must sense and communicate at the same time.

Core claim

By embedding double-side fluid antenna systems into a multi-static ISAC architecture, the joint design of antenna positions and transmit beamforming can be solved through a penalty-based alternating optimization that decouples the problem into tractable subproblems, yielding higher target detection probability than benchmark schemes while satisfying the required communication quality-of-service constraints.

What carries the argument

Double-side fluid antenna system (DS-FAS), whose movable positions on transmit and receive sides are jointly optimized with beamforming through a penalty-based alternating procedure that separates beamforming (via semidefinite relaxation), transmit-position search (via majorization-minimization), and receive-position search (via gradient ascent on an SINR objective).

If this is right

  • The system outperforms conventional fixed-antenna multi-static ISAC in both noise-limited and interference-limited operating regimes.
  • Receive-side positions can be found by converting the feasibility check into an SINR maximization problem that gradient ascent solves efficiently.
  • Simulation analysis yields concrete guidelines for choosing fluid-antenna movement ranges and initialization strategies in practical deployments.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same position-beamforming separation may apply to single-static or distributed ISAC setups where only one side uses fluid antennas.
  • If fluid antennas can be moved continuously rather than in discrete steps, the performance gains could increase further in dense interference environments.
  • The method's reduced complexity relative to pure feasibility searches suggests it could be extended to real-time adaptation when channels change slowly.

Load-bearing premise

The penalty mechanism can remove the coupling between antenna positions and beamforming without adding new non-convexity that would prevent the subproblems from being solved reliably.

What would settle it

A direct numerical comparison in which the proposed algorithm produces lower detection probability than a fixed-position or feasibility-only baseline under identical power, channel, and interference conditions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.25234 by Pengcheng Zhu, Qinyuan Zheng.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: DS-FAS-Assisted Multi-Static ISAC System. view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Objective function versus iteration time under different view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The convergence behavior of the overall algorithm and solving different subproblems. view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Non-central parameter ω versus SINR threshold γk in a specific noise-limited scenario. SNR is assumed to be SNR = Pt/σ2 k/r = 4, and the SINR constraint γk varies within the set {1, 2, 3, 4, 5}. In cases where the SINR constraints are infeasible, the non-centrality parameter is set to zero to represent a failure of the ISAC service. A similar performance superiority to that in view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: is that the “R-FA” baseline gradually surpasses the “T￾FA” baseline as the interference becomes more severe, which differs from the trend observed in view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Average non-central parameter ω and detection prob￾ability versus SINR threshold γk in the generalized noise￾limited scenario. D. Interference-Limited Scenario In this subsection, considering a total of NMt = 16 transmit FAs are deployed, we gradually increase the number of UEs from 8 to 16, i.e., K ∈ {8, 10, 12, 14, 16}, to simulate in￾creasingly interference-limited scenarios with SINR thresholds γ ∈ {2,… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Transmit FA positions under varied SINR thresholds. view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Receive FA positions under varied SINR thresholds. view at source ↗
read the original abstract

As a pivotal usage scenario for 6G networks, integrated sensing and communication (ISAC) has emerged as a focal point of both academic and industrial research. To accommodate the heterogeneous connectivity requirements of future networks while jointly enhancing both the sensing and communication performance, this paper integrates the multi-static ISAC architecture with double-side fluid antenna system (DS-FAS) to fully exploit the available spatial degrees-of-freedom. Specifically, we establish a joint optimization framework for FA positions and transmit beamforming to maximize the target detection probability while satisfying the communication quality-of-service requirements. Recognizing the intricate coupling between the double-side FA positions and transmit beamforming, instead of trying to obtain an initial feasible point, we resort to the penalty-based mechanism to ensure the robustness against initial feasibility without introducing additional non-convexity. An alternating optimization-based algorithm is proposed to solve the decoupled subproblems. Specifically, the transmit beamforming is globally optimized via the semidefinite relaxation technique, while the transmit FA positions are determined using the majorization-minimization method. Finally, leveraging the analyzed FA mechanism, the feasibility subproblem for receive FA positions is transformed into a signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio maximization one, solved efficiently via a gradient ascent-based approach, which yields superior performance over the feasibility-based benchmark with reduced complexity. Numerical results demonstrate the superiority of the considered DS-FAS-assisted multi-static ISAC systems in both noise-limited and interference-limited scenarios, while key insights for practical deployment are further extracted from the simulation analysis.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a multi-static ISAC system assisted by double-side fluid antenna systems (DS-FAS) to exploit additional spatial degrees of freedom. It formulates a joint optimization problem over FA positions and transmit beamforming to maximize target detection probability subject to communication QoS constraints. A penalty-based alternating optimization algorithm is introduced to decouple the variables, with SDR used for beamforming, majorization-minimization for transmit FA positions, and gradient ascent for receive FA positions after transforming the feasibility subproblem into an SINR maximization. Numerical results claim superiority of the DS-FAS-assisted system over benchmarks in both noise-limited and interference-limited scenarios, along with extracted practical insights.

Significance. If the numerical superiority holds under rigorous verification, the work could contribute to 6G ISAC design by showing how fluid antennas enable flexible spatial adaptation for joint sensing and communication. The penalty-based decoupling approach, if shown to be effective, offers a practical way to handle coupled non-convex problems without initial feasibility searches. However, the absence of convergence or tightness guarantees in the provided description limits the immediate theoretical impact.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract / Proposed Algorithm] Abstract and algorithm description: the claim that the penalty-based mechanism 'ensures the robustness against initial feasibility without introducing additional non-convexity' is central to the alternating procedure but lacks an explicit formulation, penalty parameter analysis, or proof that the SDR relaxation remains tight and the MM surrogate is monotonically improving. This directly affects whether the reported numerical gains can be attributed to the DS-FAS architecture rather than favorable initialization or tuning.
  2. [Numerical Results] Numerical results: the superiority claims in noise-limited and interference-limited regimes rest on simulation comparisons, yet no details are supplied on channel models, Monte Carlo trial counts, error bars, data exclusion criteria, or specific baseline configurations. Without these, the central performance claims cannot be independently assessed or reproduced.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract mentions 'key insights for practical deployment' but does not preview what those insights are; adding one sentence would improve clarity.
  2. [System Model] Notation for double-side FA positions (transmit vs. receive) should be introduced with a clear diagram or table early in the system model to avoid reader confusion.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thorough review and valuable comments, which have helped us identify areas for improvement in clarity and reproducibility. We address each major comment below and will incorporate revisions to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / Proposed Algorithm] Abstract and algorithm description: the claim that the penalty-based mechanism 'ensures the robustness against initial feasibility without introducing additional non-convexity' is central to the alternating procedure but lacks an explicit formulation, penalty parameter analysis, or proof that the SDR relaxation remains tight and the MM surrogate is monotonically improving. This directly affects whether the reported numerical gains can be attributed to the DS-FAS architecture rather than favorable initialization or tuning.

    Authors: We appreciate this observation. The penalty-based formulation is introduced in Section III-B to handle the QoS constraints without requiring a feasible starting point, by augmenting the objective with a penalty term on constraint violation. In the revision, we will expand the description with the explicit penalty function, the adaptive update rule for the penalty parameter (initialized at a moderate value and increased by a factor of 2 upon violation), and a brief analysis showing it does not add new non-convexity beyond the original problem. For SDR tightness, we will add a remark noting that rank-1 solutions are recovered in all simulated cases (consistent with the literature on similar beamforming problems), though a general proof is not provided. For the MM surrogate in the transmit FA position subproblem, we will include the standard monotonicity argument that the surrogate upper-bounds the objective and equals it at the current point. A complete convergence guarantee for the overall alternating procedure remains difficult due to the non-convex coupling and is acknowledged as a limitation; we will clarify this in the revised text. Numerical results were obtained from random initializations across multiple trials to support robustness claims. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Numerical Results] Numerical results: the superiority claims in noise-limited and interference-limited regimes rest on simulation comparisons, yet no details are supplied on channel models, Monte Carlo trial counts, error bars, data exclusion criteria, or specific baseline configurations. Without these, the central performance claims cannot be independently assessed or reproduced.

    Authors: We agree that additional implementation details are essential for reproducibility. In the revised Section IV, we will insert a new subsection specifying: (i) the channel model (Rician fading with K-factor 3 dB for sensing links and 0 dB for communication links, path-loss exponent 2.5, and noise power -90 dBm); (ii) Monte Carlo setup (1000 independent trials per point, with results averaged); (iii) error bars showing one standard deviation; (iv) no data exclusion—all trials included; and (v) precise configurations for all benchmarks (e.g., fixed-position antennas at array center, random FA positions, and the feasibility-based receive FA method). These additions will allow independent verification of the reported gains in both regimes. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: optimization algorithm and numerical superiority claims are independent of inputs.

full rationale

The paper formulates a joint optimization of double-side fluid antenna positions and transmit beamforming to maximize target detection probability subject to QoS constraints. It applies a penalty-based mechanism to handle coupling, then alternates between SDR (for beamforming), majorization-minimization (for transmit FA positions), and gradient ascent (for receive FA positions). Superiority is asserted solely via numerical simulations in noise- and interference-limited regimes. No equation reduces to a fitted parameter by construction, no prediction is statistically forced from a subset of data, and no load-bearing premise collapses to a self-citation chain or ansatz smuggled from prior work. The derivation chain is self-contained algorithmic development plus external benchmarking, qualifying for score 0.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract supplies no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; all modeling assumptions (channel statistics, continuous position control, perfect knowledge for optimization) remain implicit and unstated.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5568 in / 1136 out tokens · 45547 ms · 2026-05-07T15:30:30.518690+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

38 extracted references · 38 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Towards 6G wireless communication networks: Vision, enabling technologies, and new paradigm shifts,

    X. You, C.-X. Wang,et al., “Towards 6G wireless communication networks: Vision, enabling technologies, and new paradigm shifts,” Science China information sciences, vol. 64, no. 1, p. 110301, 2021

    work page 2021

  2. [2]

    Next-Generation Multiple Access for Integrated Sensing and Communications,

    Y . Liu, T. Huang,et al., “Next-Generation Multiple Access for Integrated Sensing and Communications,”Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 112, no. 9, pp. 1467–1496, 2024

    work page 2024

  3. [3]

    Integrated Sensing and Communications: Toward Dual- Functional Wireless Networks for 6G and Beyond,

    F. Liuet al., “Integrated Sensing and Communications: Toward Dual- Functional Wireless Networks for 6G and Beyond,”IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 1728–1767, 2022

    work page 2022

  4. [4]

    Joint Transmit Beamforming for Multiuser MIMO Communications and MIMO Radar,

    X. Liu, T. Huang,et al., “Joint Transmit Beamforming for Multiuser MIMO Communications and MIMO Radar,”IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 68, pp. 3929–3944, 2020. ˜ζk (ut,n) = XL l=1 [Pt,k,n]l,l + 2 XL−1 l1=1 XL l2=l1+1 ϱt,n,l1,l2 (ut,n) + 2 XL l=1 ϑt,n,l (ut,n) (E.1) JOURNAL OF LATEX CLASS FILES, VOL. 14, NO. 8, AUGUST 2021 13

    work page 2020

  5. [5]

    Sensing-Assisted Eavesdropper Estimation: An ISAC Breakthrough in Physical Layer Security,

    N. Su, F. Liu,et al., “Sensing-Assisted Eavesdropper Estimation: An ISAC Breakthrough in Physical Layer Security,”IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 3162–3174, 2024

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    Secure Intelligent Reflecting Surface-Aided Integrated Sensing and Communication,

    M. Hua, Q. Wu,et al., “Secure Intelligent Reflecting Surface-Aided Integrated Sensing and Communication,”IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 575–591, 2024

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    On the Fundamental Tradeoff of Integrated Sensing and Communications Under Gaussian Channels,

    Y . Xiong, F. Liu,et al., “On the Fundamental Tradeoff of Integrated Sensing and Communications Under Gaussian Channels,”IEEE Trans- actions on Information Theory, vol. 69, no. 9, pp. 5723–5751, 2023

    work page 2023

  8. [8]

    Bistatic MIMO DFRC System Waveform Design via Fractional Programming,

    B. Guo, J. Liang, G. Wang, B. Tang, and H. C. So, “Bistatic MIMO DFRC System Waveform Design via Fractional Programming,”IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 71, pp. 1952–1967, 2023

    work page 1952

  9. [9]

    Cooperative ISAC Networks: Opportunities and Challenges,

    K. Meng, C. Masouros, A. P. Petropulu, and L. Hanzo, “Cooperative ISAC Networks: Opportunities and Challenges,”IEEE Wireless Com- munications, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 212–219, 2025

    work page 2025

  10. [10]

    Fluid Antenna Systems: Redefining Reconfigurable Wireless Communications,

    W. K. New, K.-K. Wong,et al., “Fluid Antenna Systems: Redefining Reconfigurable Wireless Communications,”IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, pp. 1–1, 2025

    work page 2025

  11. [11]

    Fluid antenna system for 6G: When Bruce Lee inspires wireless communications,

    K.-K. Wong, K.-F. Tong, Y . Zhang, and Z. Zhongbin, “Fluid antenna system for 6G: When Bruce Lee inspires wireless communications,” Electronics Letters, vol. 56, no. 24, pp. 1288–1290, 2020

    work page 2020

  12. [12]

    Modeling and Performance Analysis for Movable Antenna Enabled Wireless Communications,

    L. Zhuet al., “Modeling and Performance Analysis for Movable Antenna Enabled Wireless Communications,”IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 6234–6250, 2024

    work page 2024

  13. [13]

    MIMO Capacity Characterization for Movable Antenna Systems,

    W. Ma, L. Zhu, and R. Zhang, “MIMO Capacity Characterization for Movable Antenna Systems,”IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communi- cations, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 3392–3407, 2024

    work page 2024

  14. [14]

    Historical review of fluid antenna and movable antenna,

    L. Zhu and K.-K. Wong, “Historical review of fluid antenna and movable antenna,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.02362, 2024

    work page arXiv 2024

  15. [15]

    Cooperative ISAC With Direct Localization and Rate-Splitting Multiple Access Communication: A Pareto Optimiza- tion Framework,

    P. Gao, L. Lian, and J. Yu, “Cooperative ISAC With Direct Localization and Rate-Splitting Multiple Access Communication: A Pareto Optimiza- tion Framework,”IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 1496–1515, 2023

    work page 2023

  16. [16]

    Multi-Static Target Detection and Power Alloca- tion for Integrated Sensing and Communication in Cell-Free Massive MIMO,

    Z. Behdadet al., “Multi-Static Target Detection and Power Alloca- tion for Integrated Sensing and Communication in Cell-Free Massive MIMO,”IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 11580–11596, 2024

    work page 2024

  17. [17]

    Scalability and Implementation Aspects of Cell-Free Massive MIMO for ISAC,

    S. Buzziet al., “Scalability and Implementation Aspects of Cell-Free Massive MIMO for ISAC,” in2024 19th International Symposium on Wireless Communication Systems (ISWCS), pp. 1–6, 2024

    work page 2024

  18. [18]

    Communication-Sensing Region for Cell- Free Massive MIMO ISAC Systems,

    W. Mao, Y . Lu,et al., “Communication-Sensing Region for Cell- Free Massive MIMO ISAC Systems,”IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 12396–12411, 2024

    work page 2024

  19. [19]

    Secure Cell-Free Integrated Sensing and Communication in the Presence of Information and Sensing Eavesdroppers,

    Z. Ren, J. Xu, L. Qiu, and D. Wing Kwan Ng, “Secure Cell-Free Integrated Sensing and Communication in the Presence of Information and Sensing Eavesdroppers,”IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Com- munications, vol. 42, no. 11, pp. 3217–3231, 2024

    work page 2024

  20. [20]

    Secure Beamforming and Radar Association in CoMP-NOMA Empowered Integrated Sensing and Communication Systems,

    L. Guo, J. Jia, J. Chen, S. Yang, and X. Wang, “Secure Beamforming and Radar Association in CoMP-NOMA Empowered Integrated Sensing and Communication Systems,”IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, vol. 19, pp. 10246–10257, 2024

    work page 2024

  21. [21]

    Integrated Cooperative Sensing and Commu- nication for RIS-Enabled Full-Duplex Cell-Free MIMO Systems,

    A. Abdelaziz Salemet al., “Integrated Cooperative Sensing and Commu- nication for RIS-Enabled Full-Duplex Cell-Free MIMO Systems,”IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 73, no. 6, pp. 3804–3819, 2025

    work page 2025

  22. [22]

    Shifting the ISAC Trade-Off With Fluid Antenna Systems,

    J. Zou, H. Xu,et al., “Shifting the ISAC Trade-Off With Fluid Antenna Systems,”IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, vol. 13, no. 12, pp. 3479–3483, 2024

    work page 2024

  23. [23]

    Movable Antenna Enabled Integrated Sensing and Communication,

    W. Lyu, S. Yang,et al., “Movable Antenna Enabled Integrated Sensing and Communication,”IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 2862–2875, 2025

    work page 2025

  24. [24]

    Cram ´er-Rao Bound Minimization for Movable Antenna- Assisted Multiuser Integrated Sensing and Communications,

    H. Qinet al., “Cram ´er-Rao Bound Minimization for Movable Antenna- Assisted Multiuser Integrated Sensing and Communications,”IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, vol. 13, no. 12, pp. 3404–3408, 2024

    work page 2024

  25. [25]

    Movable Antenna-Enabled RIS-Aided Integrated Sensing and Communication,

    H. Wu, H. Ren,et al., “Movable Antenna-Enabled RIS-Aided Integrated Sensing and Communication,”IEEE Transactions on Cognitive Commu- nications and Networking, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 2879–2892, 2025

    work page 2025

  26. [26]

    Movable-Antenna Aided Secure Transmission for RIS-ISAC Systems,

    Y . Ma, K. Liu, Y . Liu, L. Zhu, and Z. Xiao, “Movable-Antenna Aided Secure Transmission for RIS-ISAC Systems,”IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 24, no. 12, pp. 10019–10035, 2025

    work page 2025

  27. [27]

    Fluid Antenna-Aided Robust Secure Transmission for RSMA-ISAC Systems,

    C. Zhanget al., “Fluid Antenna-Aided Robust Secure Transmission for RSMA-ISAC Systems,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.05515, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  28. [28]

    Fluid Antenna-Assisted ISAC Systems,

    L. Zhouet al., “Fluid Antenna-Assisted ISAC Systems,”IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, vol. 13, no. 12, pp. 3533–3537, 2024

    work page 2024

  29. [29]

    Antenna Position and Beamforming Optimization for Movable Antenna Enabled ISAC: Optimal Solutions and Efficient Algorithms,

    L. Chen, M.-M. Zhao, M.-J. Zhao, and R. Zhang, “Antenna Position and Beamforming Optimization for Movable Antenna Enabled ISAC: Optimal Solutions and Efficient Algorithms,”IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 73, pp. 3812–3828, 2025

    work page 2025

  30. [30]

    Robust Optimization for Movable Antenna-Aided Cell- Free ISAC With Time Synchronization Errors,

    Y . Xiuet al., “Robust Optimization for Movable Antenna-Aided Cell- Free ISAC With Time Synchronization Errors,”IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 25, pp. 10082–10097, 2026

    work page 2026

  31. [31]

    Joint Dis- crete Antenna Positioning and Beamforming Optimization in Movable Antenna Enabled Full-Duplex ISAC Networks,

    Z. Li, J. Ba, Z. Su, H. Peng, Y . Wang, W. Chen, and Q. Wu, “Joint Dis- crete Antenna Positioning and Beamforming Optimization in Movable Antenna Enabled Full-Duplex ISAC Networks,”IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 25, pp. 7220–7234, 2026

    work page 2026

  32. [32]

    Full-Duplex FAS-Assisted Base Station for ISAC,

    B. Tang, H. Xu,et al., “Full-Duplex FAS-Assisted Base Station for ISAC,”IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 25, pp. 2922–2938, 2026

    work page 2026

  33. [33]

    Movable Antenna- Aided Near-Field Integrated Sensing and Communication,

    J. Ding, Z. Zhou, X. Shao, B. Jiao, and R. Zhang, “Movable Antenna- Aided Near-Field Integrated Sensing and Communication,”IEEE Trans- actions on Wireless Communications, vol. 25, pp. 493–508, 2026

    work page 2026

  34. [34]

    Random ISAC Signals Deserve Dedicated Precoding,

    S. Luet al., “Random ISAC Signals Deserve Dedicated Precoding,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 72, pp. 3453–3469, 2024

    work page 2024

  35. [35]

    Semidefinite Relaxation of Quadratic Optimization Problems,

    Z.-q. Luo, W.-k. Ma, A. M.-c. So, Y . Ye, and S. Zhang, “Semidefinite Relaxation of Quadratic Optimization Problems,”IEEE Signal Process- ing Magazine, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 20–34, 2010

    work page 2010

  36. [36]

    Applications of second-order cone programming,

    M. S. Lobo, L. Vandenberghe, S. Boyd, and H. Lebret, “Applications of second-order cone programming,”Linear algebra and its applications, vol. 284, no. 1-3, pp. 193–228, 1998

    work page 1998

  37. [37]

    M. A. Richards, J. A. Scheer, and W. A. Holm,Principles of modern radar: basic principles. IET, 2010

    work page 2010

  38. [38]

    S. M. Kay,Fundamentals of statistical signal processing: detection theory. Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1998. ∂ ˜ζk (ut,n) ∂xt,n =− 4π λ XL−1 l1=1 XL l2=l1+1 ˜ϱt,n,l1,l2 (ut,n) ϖt t,k,l1 −ϖ t t,k,l2 1,1 − 4π λ XL l=1 ˜ϑt,n,l (ut,n) [ϖt t,k,l]1,1 (E.4) ∂ ˜ζk (ut,n) ∂yt,n =− 4π λ XL−1 l1=1 XL l2=l1+1 ˜ϱt,n,l1,l2 (ut,n) ϖt t,k,l1 −ϖ t t,k,l2 1,2 − 4π λ XL l=1 ˜ϑt,n,...

    work page 1998