pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.26200 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-29 · 📡 eess.SP

Blind OFDM-ISAC Relying on Asymmetric Modem Constellations

Henglin Pu , Ahmad Musallam , Husheng Li , Lajos Hanzo This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 13:27 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.SP
keywords blind ISACOFDMhigher-order statisticsasymmetric constellationsco-channel interferenceradar parameter estimationblind demodulation
0
0 comments X

The pith

Blind OFDM-ISAC succeeds by exploiting interference asymmetry: sensing parameters stay recoverable via higher-order statistics while communication needs constellation asymmetry for blind recovery.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that blind integrated sensing and communication is possible in OFDM systems even under severe co-channel interference. It does this by constructing a fourth-order measurement tensor from the received signal that retains the phase information tied to range, velocity, and angle. A three-dimensional periodogram based on higher-order statistics then locates these parameters through iterative peak search. Constellation asymmetry is used to resolve phase ambiguities, allowing blind coherent demodulation without any pilots or known data. This asymmetry means communication fails on the time-frequency grid but sensing remains viable, making joint operation feasible where traditional methods would collapse.

Core claim

By constructing a fourth-order measurement tensor from the received OFDM signal, the coherent component preserves the delay-, Doppler-, and angle-dependent phase evolution of each source. This enables a three-dimensional higher-order-statistics based periodogram for joint estimation of range, velocity, and angle in the presence of unknown co-channel interferers. Constellation asymmetry then resolves remaining phase ambiguities for minimum constellation fitting based blind coherent demodulation.

What carries the argument

The fourth-order measurement tensor constructed from the received OFDM signal, whose coherent component preserves the physical parameters' phase evolution, processed by a three-dimensional HOS-based periodogram for iterative peak search and refinement.

If this is right

  • Joint estimation of range, velocity and angle is possible despite unknown co-channel interferers.
  • Phase ambiguities are resolved using constellation asymmetry for blind coherent demodulation via minimum constellation fitting.
  • Performance is benchmarked against matched data-aided and stochastic Cramer-Rao lower bounds.
  • Reliable sensing and communication are demonstrated even with severe interference on the time-frequency grid.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This tensor-based approach could be adapted to other multicarrier waveforms if similar asymmetry in interference effects holds.
  • It implies that spectrum sharing for ISAC may not require perfect interference cancellation or orthogonal resources.
  • Further work might explore the limits of this asymmetry when interference sources have similar physical parameters.

Load-bearing premise

The coherent component of the fourth-order measurement tensor preserves the delay-, Doppler-, and angle-dependent phase evolution of each source even in the presence of unknown co-channel interferers.

What would settle it

A simulation or measurement where the three-dimensional HOS periodogram is applied to the tensor from a signal with added unknown OFDM interferers; failure to accurately estimate the true range, velocity, and angle would falsify the preservation of phase information.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.26200 by Ahmad Musallam, Henglin Pu, Husheng Li, Lajos Hanzo.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Illustration of the symmetric and asymmetric constellation diagrams. view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Simulation results of estimations A. Analytical Lower Bounds Let the unknown parameter vector for a single source be ξ = [τ, ν, θ] T . As derived in Appendix A, the data-aided CRLB for each parameter is given by CRLBDA(τ ) = 1 2 · SNR · Gtot · β 2 f , (48) CRLBDA(ν) = 1 2 · SNR · Gtot · β 2 t ·  c fc 2 , (49) CRLBDA(θ) = 1 2 · SNR · Gtot · β 2 s ·  180 π 2 , (50) where SNR = σ 2 x/σ2 n is the linear si… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: RMSE performance of the proposed blind HOS estimator and benchmark methods. The top row shows delay, velocity, and view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Asymmetric APSK constellation designs denotes additive noise. Under a low-noise approximation, the fourth-power operation yields (S + W) 4 ≈ S 4 + 4S 3W. (55) Hence, the leading perturbation term after fourth-order process￾ing is scaled by 4S 3 , so its variance is amplified by approx￾imately |4S 3 | 2 = 16|S| 6 . Under unit-amplitude normalization, i.e., |S| ≈ 1, this corresponds to an approximately 16-fo… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Communication and sensing performance with different constellation designs. view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: RMSE performance for delay, velocity, and angle estimation with synchronization impairments. view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Simulation results of estimation heatmap view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Integrated sensing and communication (ISAC) is increasingly expected to operate under aggressive spectrum reuse, where co-channel orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) interference can be catastrophic for data recovery on the time-frequency (TF) grid. We show that supporting blind ISAC is feasible by exploiting a fundamental asymmetry in the impact of co-channel OFDM interference: while communication is fragile on the TF grid, sensing depends on structured physical parameters whose signatures remain identifiable by relying on higher-order statistics. Based on this observation, we construct a fourth-order measurement tensor from the received OFDM signal whose coherent component preserves the delay-, Doppler-, and angle-dependent phase evolution of each source. We then develop a three-dimensional higher-order-statistics (HOS) based periodogram for iterative peak search and refinement to jointly estimate both range, velocity, and angle in the presence of unknown co-channel interferers. We further exploit constellation asymmetry to resolve the remaining phase ambiguities of blind recovery, enabling blind coherent demodulation via minimum constellation fitting. We also benchmark the performance through matched data-aided and stochastic Cramer-Rao lower bounds. We then quantify the cost of signal blindness. Simulations and experimental validations demonstrate reliable radar parameter estimation together with effective communication demodulation even when the TF-domain link is severely interfered with.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that co-channel OFDM interference, while catastrophic for TF-grid communication, leaves identifiable signatures in higher-order statistics for sensing; it constructs a fourth-order measurement tensor whose coherent component preserves delay/Doppler/angle phase factors of each source, develops a 3D HOS periodogram for joint parameter estimation via iterative peak search, exploits constellation asymmetry to resolve blind phase ambiguities for coherent demodulation, and benchmarks against data-aided and stochastic CRLBs, with supporting simulations and experiments.

Significance. If the tensor construction and periodogram derivations hold without residual structured interference bias, the result would establish a practically useful asymmetry between communication fragility and sensing robustness under spectrum reuse, advancing blind ISAC. The combination of HOS tensor processing with constellation fitting and experimental validation strengthens the contribution if the central assumptions are rigorously verified.

major comments (2)
  1. [Fourth-order tensor construction] The derivation of the fourth-order cumulant tensor (likely in the section following the system model) must explicitly show that all cross-cumulant terms between the desired OFDM signal and unknown co-channel interferers are either zero or do not contribute coherent phase factors to the multilinear structure; because both signals are non-Gaussian and share OFDM structure, standard cumulant properties do not automatically suppress these terms, and any residual bias would invalidate the subsequent 3D HOS periodogram peaks.
  2. [Performance benchmarks] The CRLB derivations (matched data-aided and stochastic) should be compared directly to the HOS estimator under the same interference model; if the bounds assume perfect isolation of the desired source, they do not bound the actual performance when cross terms are present.
minor comments (2)
  1. [System model] Notation for the tensor dimensions and the exact definition of the coherent component versus the full cumulant should be clarified with an explicit equation.
  2. [Experimental validation] The experimental setup description would benefit from details on how co-channel interferers were generated and synchronized in the testbed.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

Thank you for the constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and will revise the paper to incorporate explicit clarifications and strengthened comparisons.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Fourth-order tensor construction] The derivation of the fourth-order cumulant tensor (likely in the section following the system model) must explicitly show that all cross-cumulant terms between the desired OFDM signal and unknown co-channel interferers are either zero or do not contribute coherent phase factors to the multilinear structure; because both signals are non-Gaussian and share OFDM structure, standard cumulant properties do not automatically suppress these terms, and any residual bias would invalidate the subsequent 3D HOS periodogram peaks.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this observation. The desired signal and co-channel interferers originate from independent transmitters and are therefore modeled as statistically independent. For independent processes, the fourth-order cumulant tensor of the sum is precisely the sum of the individual cumulant tensors, with all cross-cumulant terms identically zero by the definition of cumulants. Consequently, the coherent multilinear phase factors contributed by the desired source remain undistorted, while interferers produce separate additive terms that appear as distinct peaks in the 3D HOS periodogram. We will add an explicit derivation (new subsection or appendix) that starts from the independence assumption and demonstrates the absence of cross terms, thereby confirming that no residual structured bias affects the desired-source signatures. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Performance benchmarks] The CRLB derivations (matched data-aided and stochastic) should be compared directly to the HOS estimator under the same interference model; if the bounds assume perfect isolation of the desired source, they do not bound the actual performance when cross terms are present.

    Authors: The data-aided and stochastic CRLBs presented in the manuscript are already derived under the multi-source model that includes co-channel interference as part of the received signal statistics. The stochastic bound incorporates the higher-order moments of the aggregate interference, and the data-aided bound assumes known symbols while retaining the same interference. To make the comparison fully transparent, we will revise the benchmarking section to state these modeling assumptions explicitly, add a direct side-by-side numerical comparison of the HOS estimator against both bounds under identical interference conditions, and clarify that the bounds therefore remain valid lower bounds for the scenario considered. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation relies on standard HOS properties and physical parameter estimation

full rationale

The paper constructs a fourth-order tensor via higher-order statistics from the received OFDM signal, applies a 3D HOS periodogram for joint range-velocity-angle estimation, and uses constellation asymmetry for phase resolution in blind demodulation. These steps are defined in terms of the received signal's statistical moments and the structured physical parameters (delay, Doppler, angle) rather than being equivalent to their own outputs by construction. The asymmetry claim is an observational premise used to motivate the approach, not a self-referential definition. Benchmarks against data-aided CRLBs and stochastic CRLBs provide independent reference points outside the blind estimator itself. No load-bearing step reduces to a fitted input renamed as prediction or to a self-citation chain that substitutes for derivation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The approach rests on the domain assumption that higher-order statistics isolate the coherent physical-parameter signatures from interference; no free parameters or invented entities are explicitly introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The coherent component of the fourth-order measurement tensor preserves delay-, Doppler-, and angle-dependent phase evolution of each source despite unknown co-channel interferers.
    This is the explicit basis stated in the abstract for constructing the tensor and performing the periodogram search.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5526 in / 1441 out tokens · 67030 ms · 2026-05-07T13:27:47.535619+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

31 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Integrated sensing and communications: Toward dual-functional wireless networks for 6G and beyond,

    F. Liu, Y . Cui, C. Masouros, J. Xu, T. X. Han, Y . C. Eldar, and S. Buzzi, “Integrated sensing and communications: Toward dual-functional wireless networks for 6G and beyond,”IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Com- munications, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 1728–1767, Mar. 2022

    2022

  2. [2]

    Integrated sensing and communications: Recent advances and ten open challenges,

    S. Lu, F. Liu, Y . Li, K. Zhang, H. Huang, J. Zou, X. Li, Y . Dong, F. Dong, J. Zhu, Y . Xiong, W. Yuan, Y . Cui, and L. Hanzo, “Integrated sensing and communications: Recent advances and ten open challenges,”IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 11, no. 11, pp. 19 094–19 120, Feb. 2024

    2024

  3. [3]

    Wideband integrated sensing and communications: Spectral efficiency and signaling design,

    H. Pu, Z. Han, A. P. Petropulu, and H. Li, “Wideband integrated sensing and communications: Spectral efficiency and signaling design,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.24097, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  4. [4]

    Integrating sensing and communications for ubiquitous IoT: Applications, trends, and challenges,

    Y . Cui, F. Liu, X. Jing, and J. Mu, “Integrating sensing and communications for ubiquitous IoT: Applications, trends, and challenges,”IEEE Network, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 158–167, 2021

    2021

  5. [5]

    Space-time-frequency synthetic integrated sensing and communication networks,

    H. Pu, X. Wang, L. Su, and H. Li, “Space-time-frequency synthetic integrated sensing and communication networks,”IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 25, pp. 15 004–15 020, 2026

    2026

  6. [6]

    Interference management for integrated sensing and communication systems: A survey,

    Y . Niu, Z. Wei, L. Wang, H. Wu, and Z. Feng, “Interference management for integrated sensing and communication systems: A survey,”IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 8110–8134, 2025

    2025

  7. [7]

    An overview of signal processing techniques for joint communication and radar sensing,

    J. A. Zhang, F. Liu, C. Masouros, R. W. Heath, Z. Feng, L. Zheng, and A. Petropulu, “An overview of signal processing techniques for joint communication and radar sensing,”IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 1295–1315, 2021

    2021

  8. [8]

    Joint beampattern and symbol- level waveform design for integrated sensing and communication,

    Z. Zhang, Q. Chang, L. Chen, and Z. Zhao, “Joint beampattern and symbol- level waveform design for integrated sensing and communication,”Digital Signal Processing, vol. 133, p. 103861, 2023

    2023

  9. [9]

    Symbol- scaling based interference exploitation in ISAC systems: From symbol level to block level,

    Y . Wang, X. Hu, A. Li, C. Masouros, K.-K. Wong, and K. Yang, “Symbol- scaling based interference exploitation in ISAC systems: From symbol level to block level,”IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 2451–2466, 2025

    2025

  10. [10]

    Symbol-level precoding for integrated sensing and communications: A faster-than-nyquist approach,

    Z. Liao and F. Liu, “Symbol-level precoding for integrated sensing and communications: A faster-than-nyquist approach,”IEEE Communications Letters, vol. 27, no. 12, pp. 3210–3214, 2023

    2023

  11. [11]

    Symbol-level precoding for MIMO ISAC transmission based on interference exploitation,

    Y . Chen, F. Liu, Z. Liao, and F. Dong, “Symbol-level precoding for MIMO ISAC transmission based on interference exploitation,”IEEE Communica- tions Letters, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 283–287, 2024

    2024

  12. [12]

    Symbol-level precoding-based self-interference cancellation for ISAC systems,

    S. Cai, Z. Chen, Y .-F. Liu, and J. Zhang, “Symbol-level precoding-based self-interference cancellation for ISAC systems,” inIEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 2025, pp. 1–5

    2025

  13. [13]

    Reliability performance analysis for OTFS modulation based integrated sensing and communication,

    J. Shi, X. Hu, Z. Tie, X. Chen, W. Liang, and Z. Li, “Reliability performance analysis for OTFS modulation based integrated sensing and communication,”Digital Signal Processing, vol. 144, p. 104280, 2024

    2024

  14. [14]

    OTFS-assisted ISAC system: Delay doppler channel estimation and sdr-based implementation,

    X. Wei, W. Yuan, K. Zhang, and F. Liu, “OTFS-assisted ISAC system: Delay doppler channel estimation and sdr-based implementation,”IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, vol. 24, no. 11, pp. 11 865–11 878, 2025

    2025

  15. [15]

    Cyclostationarity-based joint domain approach to blind recognition of SCLD and OFDM signals,

    Z. Sun, Y . Chen, S. Liu, and W. Wang, “Cyclostationarity-based joint domain approach to blind recognition of SCLD and OFDM signals,” EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing, vol. 2014, no. 1, p. 5, 2014

    2014

  16. [16]

    Blind modulation classification for asynchronous OFDM systems over unknown signal parameters and channel statistics,

    R. Gupta, S. Kumar, and S. Majhi, “Blind modulation classification for asynchronous OFDM systems over unknown signal parameters and channel statistics,”IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 69, no. 5, pp. 5281–5292, May 2020

    2020

  17. [17]

    Constellation-based blind sensing for OFDM-ISAC with cochannel interference,

    H. Pu, Z. Han, A. P. Petropulu, and H. Li, “Constellation-based blind sensing for OFDM-ISAC with cochannel interference,”IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, vol. 15, pp. 2338–2342, 2026

    2026

  18. [18]

    Subspace-based blind and semi-blind channel estimation for OFDM systems,

    B. Muquet, M. de Courville, and P. Duhamel, “Subspace-based blind and semi-blind channel estimation for OFDM systems,”IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 50, no. 7, pp. 1699–1712, jul. 2002

    2002

  19. [19]

    Blind channel identification and equalization in OFDM-based multiantenna systems,

    H. Bolcskei, R. Heath, and A. Paulraj, “Blind channel identification and equalization in OFDM-based multiantenna systems,”IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 96–109, jan. 2002

    2002

  20. [20]

    Dual- blind deconvolution for overlaid radar-communications systems,

    E. Vargas, K. V . Mishra, R. Jacome, B. M. Sadler, and H. Arguello, “Dual- blind deconvolution for overlaid radar-communications systems,”IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Information Theory, vol. 4, pp. 75–93, 2023

    2023

  21. [21]

    Joint radar-communications processing from a dual-blind deconvo- lution perspective,

    ——, “Joint radar-communications processing from a dual-blind deconvo- lution perspective,” inIEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 2022, pp. 5622–5626

    2022

  22. [22]

    Multi- antenna dual-blind deconvolution for joint radar-communications via soman minimization,

    R. Jacome, E. Vargas, K. V . Mishra, B. M. Sadler, and H. Arguello, “Multi- antenna dual-blind deconvolution for joint radar-communications via soman minimization,”Signal Processing, vol. 221, p. 109484, 2024

    2024

  23. [23]

    Integrated near field sensing and communications using unitary approximate message passing-based matrix factorization,

    Z. Yuan, Q. Guo, Y . C. Eldar, and Y . Li, “Integrated near field sensing and communications using unitary approximate message passing-based matrix factorization,”IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 73, no. 10, pp. 9939–9953, Oct. 2025

    2025

  24. [24]

    ISAC super-resolution receiver via lifted atomic norm minimization,

    I. Valiulahi, C. Masouros, and A. P. Petropulu, “ISAC super-resolution receiver via lifted atomic norm minimization,”IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 74, pp. 5184–5198, 2026

    2026

  25. [25]

    Selecting the modeling order for the ESPRIT high resolution method: an alternative approach,

    R. Badeau, B. David, and G. Richard, “Selecting the modeling order for the ESPRIT high resolution method: an alternative approach,” inIEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, vol. 2, 2004, pp. ii–1025

    2004

  26. [26]

    Estimating the number of sources: An efficient maximization approach,

    T. Salman, A. Badawy, T. M. Elfouly, A. Mohamed, and T. Khattab, “Estimating the number of sources: An efficient maximization approach,” in International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing Conference (IWCMC), 2015, pp. 199–204

    2015

  27. [27]

    On the use of windows for harmonic analysis with the discrete fourier transform,

    F. Harris, “On the use of windows for harmonic analysis with the discrete fourier transform,”Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 51–83, Jan. 1978

    1978

  28. [28]

    Radar CFAR thresholding in clutter and multiple target situations,

    H. Rohling, “Radar CFAR thresholding in clutter and multiple target situations,”IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. AES-19, no. 4, pp. 608–621, Jul. 1983

    1983

  29. [29]

    A general MIMO framework for NOMA downlink and uplink transmission based on signal alignment,

    Z. Ding, R. Schober, and H. V . Poor, “A general MIMO framework for NOMA downlink and uplink transmission based on signal alignment,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 4438– 4454, 2016

    2016

  30. [30]

    Digital amplitude-phase keying with M-ary alphabets,

    C. Thomas, M. Weidner, and S. Durrani, “Digital amplitude-phase keying with M-ary alphabets,”IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 168–180, 1974

    1974

  31. [31]

    S. M. Kay,Fundamentals of statistical signal processing: estimation theory. Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1993

    1993