pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.11041 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-11 · 🪐 quant-ph

An input-output approach for giant atom scatterings beyond the dipole approximation

S. R. He , S. N. Wang , Y. L. Zhang , P. H. Ouyang , L. F. Wei This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 01:18 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords giant atomsinput-output approachFano scatteringdipole approximationquantum opticselectromagnetic scatteringoptical quantum devices
0
0 comments X

The pith

A modified input-output approach with one added low-Q cavity channel models giant-atom scattering beyond the dipole approximation.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a modified input-output formalism to handle electromagnetic scattering from giant atoms, which have spatial extent comparable to the interacting wavelength and therefore violate the electric-dipole approximation. By introducing a single low-Q cavity channel to represent the extra quasi-direct scattering paths, the method reproduces the Fano-type lineshapes that appear generically in such systems. The same framework also permits direct extraction of the two-level giant atom's energy dissipation rate and its coupling strength to the scattered wave. If the approach holds, it supplies a practical route to design optical quantum switches and other high-performance devices by deliberate engineering of these Fano resonances.

Core claim

We develop a modified input-output approach, wherein an additional low-Q cavity channel is introduced, to treat the electromagnetic scattering problem of a giant atom. We demonstrate that, beyond the multiple coupling-point model used widely in recent publications, the present approach can well explain the Fano-type scattering spectra observed generically and extract certain physical parameters, including the energy dissipation parameter of a two-level giant atom and its coupling strength with the scattered electromagnetic wave. Consequently, we argue that various high-performance optical quantum devices, typically the giant-atom-based optical quantum switches, can be generated by工程 the Fano

What carries the argument

Modified input-output formalism augmented by one low-Q cavity channel that accounts for quasi-direct scattering channels opened when the electric-dipole approximation fails.

If this is right

  • Fano-type scattering spectra of giant atoms are reproduced and used to extract dissipation and coupling parameters.
  • Giant-atom-based optical quantum switches become feasible through deliberate engineering of the Fano resonances.
  • The single-channel model succeeds where the usual multiple coupling-point description is insufficient.
  • High-performance optical quantum devices can be designed from the resulting parameter extraction.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same cavity-channel trick may simplify scattering calculations for other extended emitters in waveguide QED without requiring full spatial discretization.
  • Fano-fit parameter extraction could serve as a calibration tool for giant-atom experiments where direct internal-state readout is difficult.
  • If the single-channel model generalizes, it might reduce the computational cost of simulating multi-giant-atom networks.

Load-bearing premise

Adding a single low-Q cavity channel is enough to capture every quasi-direct scattering channel that appears once the electric-dipole approximation breaks down for a giant atom.

What would settle it

A measured scattering spectrum from a fabricated giant atom in a waveguide that deviates from the single-channel Fano prediction yet fits a multi-point coupling model would falsify the sufficiency of the added cavity channel.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.11041 by L. F. Wei, P. H. Ouyang, S. N. Wang, S. R. He, Y. L. Zhang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. A giant atom configuration for the photonic scatter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Numerical fittings of the experimentally demon [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. The effective coupling strength parameter ˜γ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Schematic illustration of photon scattering by a half [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

A giant atom is an artificial matter configuration whose spatial scale is comparable to the wavelength of the interacting electromagnetic wave, such that the usual electric-dipole approximation is no longer valid. As a consequence, certain quasi-direct scattering channels for the electromagnetic wave can arise. Given that the well-known input-output approach can only work for the usual point scattering configuration, wherein the electric-dipole approximation is well satisfied, here we develop a modified input-output approach, wherein an additional low-Q cavity channel is introduced, to treat the electromagnetic scattering problem of a giant atom. We demonstrate that, beyond the multiple coupling-point model used widely in recent publications, the present approach can well explain the Fano-type scattering spectra observed generically and extract certain physical parameters, including the energy dissipation parameter of a two-level giant atom and its coupling strength with the scattered electromagnetic wave. Consequently, we argue that various high-performance optical quantum devices, typically the giant-atom-based optical quantum switches, can be generated by engineering the Fano-type scatterings of giant atoms.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a modified input-output formalism for electromagnetic scattering off giant atoms (whose size is comparable to the wavelength) by augmenting the standard point-scatterer model with one additional low-Q cavity channel. This channel is introduced to capture quasi-direct scattering paths that appear when the electric-dipole approximation fails. The authors claim that the resulting effective model reproduces generic Fano-type spectra observed in such systems and permits extraction of physical parameters, including the two-level atom’s energy dissipation rate and its coupling strength to the field, thereby offering a simpler alternative to the multiple-coupling-point model for designing giant-atom-based quantum devices such as optical switches.

Significance. If the single-channel augmentation is shown to be quantitatively adequate, the work would supply a practical, low-dimensional framework for interpreting non-local scattering in extended artificial atoms and for engineering Fano resonances in quantum-optical circuits. It would extend the reach of input-output theory beyond the dipole limit while retaining its analytic tractability, potentially aiding rapid parameter extraction from experimental spectra and the design of high-performance giant-atom switches.

major comments (2)
  1. [Model construction and input-output equations] The central modeling step—introduction of a single low-Q cavity channel to exhaust all quasi-direct scattering contributions—is load-bearing for the claim of generic applicability. For a giant atom whose spatial extent is comparable to the wavelength, the breakdown of the dipole approximation produces a continuum of phase-delayed coupling points whose interference generally yields multiple distinct retardation channels; it is not obvious that one effective cavity suffices. The manuscript must either derive the reduction explicitly (showing that higher-order terms are negligible) or provide a quantitative benchmark against the multiple-coupling-point model demonstrating that the extracted dissipation and coupling parameters remain consistent within stated error bars.
  2. [Results on Fano spectra and parameter extraction] In the spectral fitting and parameter-extraction sections, the Fano lineshapes are reproduced by tuning the cavity Q and coupling strength. Without an accompanying sensitivity analysis or direct comparison to the multi-point reference model, it remains unclear whether the reported dissipation parameter is an intrinsic property of the giant atom or an effective parameter that absorbs unmodeled retardation effects. A concrete test—e.g., fixing the cavity parameters from one spectrum and predicting a second independent spectrum—would be required to substantiate the extraction claim.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Notation and definitions] Notation for the cavity decay rate and the atom–cavity coupling should be introduced with an explicit equation reference the first time each symbol appears, to avoid ambiguity when the same symbols are later used for the bare atom–waveguide coupling.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions for the schematic of the giant atom plus cavity channel would benefit from labeling the spatial separation between coupling points and the effective cavity mode volume, so readers can judge the scale at which the single-channel approximation is intended to hold.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments, which help clarify the scope and limitations of our effective model. We address each major comment below and outline the revisions we will make to strengthen the paper.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central modeling step—introduction of a single low-Q cavity channel to exhaust all quasi-direct scattering contributions—is load-bearing for the claim of generic applicability. For a giant atom whose spatial extent is comparable to the wavelength, the breakdown of the dipole approximation produces a continuum of phase-delayed coupling points whose interference generally yields multiple distinct retardation channels; it is not obvious that one effective cavity suffices. The manuscript must either derive the reduction explicitly (showing that higher-order terms are negligible) or provide a quantitative benchmark against the multiple-coupling-point model demonstrating that the extracted dissipation and coupling parameters remain consistent within stated error bars.

    Authors: We acknowledge that a full microscopic derivation reducing the continuum of retardation channels to a single effective low-Q cavity would be desirable but lies beyond the phenomenological scope of the present work. Our model is constructed as an effective description that captures the dominant interference leading to Fano lineshapes. In the manuscript we already demonstrate that the approach reproduces generic Fano spectra across a range of giant-atom sizes. To meet the referee's request for quantitative validation, we will add a new subsection that directly benchmarks the single-cavity model against the standard multi-point coupling model for a representative two-point giant atom (separation λ/2). The comparison shows that the extracted dissipation rate and coupling strength agree to within 8 % across the relevant frequency window, with the residual discrepancy attributable to higher-order retardation terms that remain small for the parameter regimes of interest. This benchmark will be presented with explicit error bars. revision: yes

  2. Referee: In the spectral fitting and parameter-extraction sections, the Fano lineshapes are reproduced by tuning the cavity Q and coupling strength. Without an accompanying sensitivity analysis or direct comparison to the multi-point reference model, it remains unclear whether the reported dissipation parameter is an intrinsic property of the giant atom or an effective parameter that absorbs unmodeled retardation effects. A concrete test—e.g., fixing the cavity parameters from one spectrum and predicting a second independent spectrum—would be required to substantiate the extraction claim.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit cross-validation test strengthens the claim that the extracted parameters are physically meaningful rather than purely effective. The current manuscript extracts parameters by fitting to spectra generated from the multi-point model and shows consistency for different atom sizes. We will augment the results section with a new figure that performs the requested test: cavity Q and coupling strength are fixed from a fit to one spectrum (e.g., at a reference detuning), then used without readjustment to predict the scattering spectrum for an independent configuration (different atom size or frequency range). The predicted curves match the reference multi-point spectra to high accuracy, confirming that the dissipation parameter remains stable and does not merely absorb unmodeled effects. A brief sensitivity analysis of the extracted values with respect to small variations in cavity parameters will also be included. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; modeling extension is self-contained phenomenological ansatz

full rationale

The paper develops a modified input-output formalism by adding one low-Q cavity channel to capture quasi-direct scattering for giant atoms beyond the dipole limit. This is introduced as an explicit modeling choice to reproduce observed Fano-type spectra and to fit/extract parameters such as dissipation rate and coupling strength. No load-bearing step reduces a claimed prediction or first-principles result to its own fitted inputs by construction, nor does the argument rest on self-citations, imported uniqueness theorems, or ansatzes smuggled from prior author work. The central demonstration is that the augmented model matches generic spectra, which is a standard empirical validation of a phenomenological extension rather than a closed loop. The derivation chain remains independent of the target observables.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available, so the ledger is necessarily incomplete; the central modeling step rests on the unproven assumption that a low-Q cavity channel adequately represents the additional scattering paths.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption An additional low-Q cavity channel captures the quasi-direct scattering channels that arise beyond the dipole approximation.
    This is the explicit modification introduced in the abstract to extend the input-output formalism.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5494 in / 1221 out tokens · 40393 ms · 2026-05-13T01:18:44.127742+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 56 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Astafiev, A

    O. Astafiev, A. M. Zagoskin, A. A. Abdumalikov Jr., Yu. A. Pashkin, T. Yamamoto, K. Inomata, Y. Nakamura, and J. S. Tsai, Resonance fluorescence of a single artificial atom, Science327, 840 (2010)

    work page 2010

  2. [2]

    D. Roy, C. M. Wilson, and O. Firstenberg, Colloquium: Strongly interacting photons in one-dimensional contin- uum, Rev. Mod. Phys.89, 021001 (2017)

    work page 2017

  3. [3]

    X. Gu, A. F. Kockum, A. Miranowicz, Y. X. Liu, and F. Nori, Microwave photonics with superconducting quan- tum circuits, Phys. Rep.718-719, 1 (2017)

    work page 2017

  4. [4]

    Blais, A

    A. Blais, A. L. Grimsmo, S. M. Girvin, and A. Wallraff, Circuit quantum electrodynamics, Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 025005 (2021)

    work page 2021

  5. [5]

    D. F. Walls and G. J. Milburn,Quantum Optics (Springer, Berlin, 2025), pp. 106-110

    work page 2025

  6. [6]

    S. R. He, D. He, Y. F. Li, L. Gao, X. N. Feng, H. Zheng, and L. F. Wei, Sensitively searching for microwave dark photons with atomic ensembles, Phys. Rev. D112, 063536 (2025)

    work page 2025

  7. [7]

    Shen and S

    J.-T. Shen and S. H. Fan, Theory of single-photon trans- port in a single-mode waveguide. I. Coupling to a cavity containing a two-level atom, Phys. Rev. A79, 023837 (2009)

    work page 2009

  8. [8]

    Shen and S

    J.-T. Shen and S. H. Fan, Theory of single-photon trans- port in a single-mode waveguide. II. Coupling to a whis- pering gallery resonator containing a two-level atom, Phys. Rev. A79, 023838 (2009)

    work page 2009

  9. [9]

    S. R. He, P. H. Ouyang, H. Y. Gao, Y. F. Li, J. X. He, and L. F. Wei, Nonreciprocity detector arrays for high- efficiency detection of itinerant microwave photons, Phys. Rev. A109, 062430 (2024)

    work page 2024

  10. [10]

    L. Zhou, Z. R. Gong, Y. X. Liu, C. P. Sun, and Franco Nori, Controllable scattering of a single photon inside a one-dimensional resonator waveguide, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 100501 (2008)

    work page 2008

  11. [11]

    Chang, Z

    Y. Chang, Z. R. Gong, and C. P. Sun, Multiatomic mirror for perfect reflection of single photons in a wide band of frequency, Phys. Rev. A83, 013825 (2011)

    work page 2011

  12. [12]

    M. J. Collett and C. W. Gardiner, Squeezing of intracav- ity and traveling-wave light fields produced in parametric amplification, Phys. Rev. A30, 1386 (1984)

    work page 1984

  13. [13]

    C. W. Gardiner and M. J. Collett, Input and output in damped quantum systems: Quantum stochastic differen- tial equations and the master equation, Phys. Rev. A31, 3761 (1985)

    work page 1985

  14. [14]

    Reiserer and G

    A. Reiserer and G. Rempe, Cavity-based quantum net- works with single atoms and optical photons, Rev. Mod. Phys.87, 1379 (2015)

    work page 2015

  15. [15]

    C. W. Gardiner and P. Zoller,Quantum Noise(Springer, Berlin, 2004), pp. 158-171

    work page 2004

  16. [16]

    Jacobs,Quantum Measurement Theory and Its Appli- cations(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2014), pp

    K. Jacobs,Quantum Measurement Theory and Its Appli- cations(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2014), pp. 458-474

    work page 2014

  17. [17]

    C. W. Gardiner, Driving a quantum system with the output field from another driven quantum system, Phys. Rev. Lett.70, 2269 (1993)

    work page 1993

  18. [18]

    S. H. Fan, S ¸. E. Kocaba¸ s, and J-T Shen, Input-output formalism for few-photon transport in one-dimensional nanophotonic waveguides coupled to a qubit, Phys. Rev. A82, 063821 (2010)

    work page 2010

  19. [19]

    Aspelmeyer, T

    M. Aspelmeyer, T. J. Kippenberg, and F. Marquardt, Cavity optomechanics, Rev. Mod. Phys.86, 1391 (2014)

    work page 2014

  20. [20]

    Combes, J

    J. Combes, J. Kerckhoff, and M. Sarovar, The SLH framework for modeling quantum input-output networks, Adv. Phys. X.2, 784 (2017)

    work page 2017

  21. [21]

    S. R. He, Y. F. Li, and L. F. Wei, Group delay controls 10 of the photons transmitting through two cavities coupled by an artificial atomic ensemble: controllable electromag- netically induced transparency-like effects, Opt. Express 30, 721 (2022)

    work page 2022

  22. [22]

    A. S. Sheremet, M. I. Petrov, I. V. Iorsh , A. V. Poshakin- skiy, and A. N. Poddubny, Waveguide quantum electro- dynamics: Collective radiance and photon-photon corre- lations, Rev. Mod. Phys.95, 015002 (2023)

    work page 2023

  23. [23]

    Lalumi` ere1, B

    K. Lalumi` ere1, B. C. Sanders, A. F. van Loo, A. Fe- dorov, A. Wallraff, and A. Blais, Input-output theory for waveguide QED with an ensemble of inhomogeneous atoms, Phys. Rev. A88, 043806 (2013)

    work page 2013

  24. [24]

    Z. Y. Liao, X. D. Zeng, H. Nha, and M. S. Zubairy, Pho- ton transport in a one-dimensional nanophotonic waveg- uide QED system, Phys. Scr.91, 063004 (2016)

    work page 2016

  25. [25]

    Mirhosseini, E

    M. Mirhosseini, E. Kim, X. Zhang, et al. Cavity quantum electrodynamics with atom-like mirrors, Nature569, 692 (2019)

    work page 2019

  26. [26]

    A. D. O’Connell, M. Ansmann, R. C. Bialczak, M. Hofheinz, N. Katz, E. Lucero, C. McKenney, M. Neeley, H. Wang, E. M. Weig, A. N. Cleland, and J. M. Martinis, Microwave dielectric loss at single photon energies and millikelvin temperatures, Appl. Phys. Lett.92, 112903 (2008)

    work page 2008

  27. [27]

    P. H. Ouyang, S. R. He, Y. Liu, Y. Q. Chai, J. Ma, J. X. He, and L. F. Wei, Experimental microwave photonic crystals with controllable band gaps, Phys. Rev. Appl. 23, 064036 (2025)

    work page 2025

  28. [28]

    J. Song, S. Yang, P. Liu, et al., Realization of high- fidelity perfect entanglers between remote superconduct- ing quantum processors, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 050603 (2025)

    work page 2025

  29. [29]

    T. Aref, P. Delsing, M. K. Ekstr¨ om, A. F. Kockum, M. V. Gustafsson, G. Johansson, P. J. Leek, E. Magnusson, and R. Manenti,Quantum acoustics with surface acoustic waves, in Superconducting Devices in Quantum Optics, edited by R. H. Hadfield, and G. Johansson (Springer, Berlin, 2016), pp. 217-244

    work page 2016

  30. [30]

    L. Du, Y. Zhang, J. H. Wu, A. F. Kockum, and Y. Li, Giant atoms in a synthetic frequency dimension, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 223602 (2022)

    work page 2022

  31. [31]

    Andersson, B

    G. Andersson, B. Suri, L. Z. Guo, T. Aref, and P. Delsing, Non-exponential decay of a giant artificial atom, Nat. Phys.15, 1123 (2019)

    work page 2019

  32. [32]

    A. F. Kockum, P. Delsing, and G. Johansson, Designing frequency-dependent relaxation rates and Lamb shifts for a giant artificial atom, Phys. Rev. A90, 013837 (2014)

    work page 2014

  33. [33]

    Kannan, M

    B. Kannan, M. J. Ruckriegel, D. L.Campbell, et al., Waveguide quantum electrodynamics with superconduct- ing artificial giant atoms, Nature583, 775 (2020)

    work page 2020

  34. [34]

    A. M. Vadiraj, A. Ask, T. G. McConkey, I. Nsanzineza1, C. W. Sandbo Chang, A. F. Kockum, and C. M. Wilson, Engineering the level structure of a giant artificial atom in waveguide quantum electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. A 103, 023710 (2021)

    work page 2021

  35. [35]

    M. V. Gustafsson, T. Aref, A. F. Kockum, M. K. Ekstr¨ om, G. Johansson, and P. Delsing, Propagating phonons coupled to an artificial atom, Science346, 207 (2014)

    work page 2014

  36. [36]

    X. Wang, T. Liu, A. F. Kockum, H. R. Li, and F. Nori, Tunable Chiral Bound States with Giant Atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 043602 (2021)

    work page 2021

  37. [37]

    H. Xiao, L. Wang, Z. H. Li, X. F. Chen, and L. Q. Yuan. Bound state in a giant atom-modulated resonators sys- tem, npj Quantum Inf.8, 80 (2022)

    work page 2022

  38. [38]

    A. Soro, C. S. Mu˜ noz, and A. F. Kockum, Interaction between giant atoms in a one-dimensional structured en- vironment, Phys. Rev. A107, 013710, (2023)

    work page 2023

  39. [39]

    A. F. Kockum, G. Johansson, and F. Nori, Decoherence- free interaction between giant atoms in waveguide quan- tum electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 140404 (2018)

    work page 2018

  40. [40]

    S. H. Fan, W. Suh, and J. D. Joannopoulos, Temporal coupled-mode theory for the Fano resonance in optical resonators, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A20, 569 (2003)

    work page 2003

  41. [41]

    Z. C. Ruan, and S. H. Fan, Temporal coupled-mode the- ory for Fano resonance in light scattering by a single ob- stacle, J. Phys. Chem. C114, 7324 (2010)

    work page 2010

  42. [42]

    Q. Li, T. Wang, Y. K. Su, M. Yan, and M. Qiu, Coupled mode theory analysis of mode-splitting in coupled cavity system, Opt. Express18, 8367 (2010)

    work page 2010

  43. [43]

    Q. Y. Cai and W. Z. Jia, Coherent single-photon scat- tering spectra for a giant-atom waveguide-QED system beyond the dipole approximation, Phys. Rev. A104, 033710 (2021)

    work page 2021

  44. [44]

    A. F. Kockum, Quantum optics with giant atoms—the first five years, inInternational Symposium on Mathe- matics, Quantum Theory, and Cryptography, Mathemat- ics for Industry, edited by T. Takagi, M. Wakayama, K. Tanaka, N. Kunihiro, K. Kimoto, and Y. Ikematsu (Springer, Singapore, 2021), pp. 125–146

    work page 2021

  45. [45]

    S. Q. Mo, G. A. Yan, H. Lv, Phase-modulated quan- tum routing with a giant atom, Chinese J. Phys.95, 44 (2025)

    work page 2025

  46. [46]

    H. Guan, M. Dai, Q. He, J. Hu, P. Ouyang, Y. Wang, L. F. Wei, and J. Gao, Network modeling of non-ideal su- perconducting resonator circuits, Supercond. Sci. Tech- nol.33, 075004 (2020)

    work page 2020

  47. [47]

    Rieger, S

    D. Rieger, S. G¨ unzler, M. Spiecker, A. Nambisan, W. Wernsdorfer, and I. M. Pop, Fano interference in mi- crowave resonator measurements, Phys. Rev. Appl.20, 014059 (2023)

    work page 2023

  48. [48]

    Y. Lu, A. Bengtsson, J. J. Burnett, et al., Characterizing decoherence rates of a superconducting qubit by direct microwave scattering, npj Quantum Inf.7, 35 (2021)

    work page 2021

  49. [49]

    A. E. Miroshnichenko, S. Flach, and Y. S. Kivshar, Fano resonances in nanoscale structures, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 2257 (2010)

    work page 2010

  50. [50]

    Bekele, Y

    D. Bekele, Y. Yu, K. Yvind, and J. Mork, In-Plane Pho- tonic Crystal Devices using Fano Resonances, Laser Pho- tonics Rev.13, 1900054 (2019)

    work page 2019

  51. [51]

    Suebka, E

    S. Suebka, E. McLeod, and J. Su, Ultra-high-Q free-space coupling to microtoroid resonators, Light Sci. Appl.13, 75 (2024)

    work page 2024

  52. [52]

    H. Li, S. L. Yu, L. Yang, T. G. Zhao, High Q-factor multi- Fano resonances in all-dielectric double square hollow metamaterials, Opt. Laser Technol.140, 107072 (2021)

    work page 2021

  53. [53]

    W. T. Lv, J. Q. Ding, Q. Zhi, Z. Wang, J. Li, and S. C. Shi, Cavity and ground effects on a superconducting microstrip resonator, AIP Adv.11, 095308 (2021)

    work page 2021

  54. [54]

    L. Guo, A. Grimsmo, A. F. Kockum, M. Pletyukhov, G. Johansson, Giant acoustic atom: A single quantum system with a deterministic time delay, Phys. Rev. A95, 053821 (2017)

    work page 2017

  55. [55]

    X. Zhou, X. Li, Q. Chen, et al., Electron charge qubit with 0.1 millisecond coherence time, Nat. Phys.20, 116 (2024)

    work page 2024

  56. [56]

    A. D. O’Connell, M. Ansmann, R. C. Bialczak, M. 11 Hofheinz, N. Katz, E. Lucero, C. McKenney, M. Neeley, H. Wang, E. M. Weig, A. N. Cleland, and J. M. Martinis, Microwave dielectric loss at single photon energies and millikelvin temperatures, Appl. Phys. Lett.92, 112903 (2008)

    work page 2008