{"as_of":"2026-08-21T03:07:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:59422baab0c816bd6ac40563f0127de03fb328c6ae9da7e7b7937dd137f79911","coverage":[{"denominator":0,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":2,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":2,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":2,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":2,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T00:37:59.133017Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"pith","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T00:37:59.179647Z","state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2605.12726","last_updated":"2026-07-09T09:24:42Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T05:54:24.149722Z","submitted_at":"2026-05-12T20:30:24Z","title":"Before the Last Token: Diagnosing Final-Token Safety Probe Failures","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2605.12726","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T06:30:54.427031Z","title":"Before the last token: Diagnosing final-token safety probe failures","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2026},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.14147","last_updated":"2026-07-14T09:30:34Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-20T11:28:02.235970Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-14T09:30:34Z","title":"Breaking Refusal in the First Half: A Mechanistic Study of the Prefill Jailbreak","version":1},"reference_index":35,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-02T06:30:54.427031Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2605.12726","citing_paper":"/paper/2607.14147"},"observation_digest":"sha256:529ace0d65889e0712b047b78cec7da182a55e83f25e821dd7917e04570d1c98","observation_id":"415a905c-23db-48d8-a56d-cbb56e48baff","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-02T06:30:54.427031Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2605.12726","last_updated":"2026-07-09T09:24:42Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T05:54:24.149722Z","submitted_at":"2026-05-12T20:30:24Z","title":"Before the Last Token: Diagnosing Final-Token Safety Probe Failures","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2605.12726","doi":null,"metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"2605.12726","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T00:37:59.179647Z","title":"Before the Last Token: Diagnosing Final-Token Safety Probe Failures","venue":"cs.LG","work_id":"66ea6432-640f-4a9c-b55b-5ec4319491f2","year":2026},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2608.08029","last_updated":"2026-08-08T09:34:22Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-20T13:43:55.668322Z","submitted_at":"2026-08-08T09:34:22Z","title":"Do All LLMs Know When They're Being Harmful? A Reproducibility Study of Latent-Space Safety Probes Across Model Families","version":1},"reference_index":28,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T00:37:59.133017Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2605.12726","citing_paper":"/paper/2608.08029"},"observation_digest":"sha256:29e5e41fdba9a75335a7d59f3f9a1c56fc5143957cf1b2f34fc481647cf0bd33","observation_id":"e4a529d2-ad31-4e7d-8d5d-ae1e3a121040","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T00:37:59.186952Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"metadata_mismatch"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:54.927442+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}}],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2605.12726/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2605.12726/integrity","json":"/paper/2605.12726/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2605.12726"},"outbound":[],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2605.12726","last_updated":"2026-07-09T09:24:42Z","latest_version":2,"primary_category":"cs.LG","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T05:54:24.149722Z","submitted_at":"2026-05-12T20:30:24Z","title":"Before the Last Token: Diagnosing Final-Token Safety Probe Failures"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":0,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":0,"verified_exact":0,"verified_fuzzy":0},"total_outbound_references":0},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:54.927442+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 21 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 2 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2605.12726."}